Dot size effects of nanocrystalline germanium on charging dynamics of memory devices
© Mao; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 27 November 2012
Accepted: 6 January 2013
Published: 10 January 2013
The dot size of nanocrystalline germanium (NC Ge) which impacts on the charging dynamics of memory devices has been theoretically investigated. The calculations demonstrate that the charge stored in the NC Ge layer and the charging current at a given oxide voltage depend on the dot size especially on a few nanometers. They have also been found to obey the tendency of initial increase, then saturation, and lastly, decrease with increasing dot size at any given charging time, which is caused by a compromise between the effects of the lowest conduction states and the capacitance of NC Ge layer on the tunneling. The experimental data from literature have also been used to compare and validate the theoretical analysis.
KeywordsQuantum size Nanocrystalline Tunneling Memory devices 85.30.Tv 85.35.-p 73.63.-b
Memory structures based on Ge nanocrystals (NCs) have received much attention for the next-generation nonvolatile memory devices due to their extended scalability and improved memory performance [1–7]. There are numerous ways of synthesizing Ge NCs. The mean diameter (d) of nanocrystalline germanium (NC Ge) using molecular beam epitaxy is uniquely controlled by the nominal thickness (of the deposited amorphous Ge according to the law d ≈ Kt with K ~ 7 using molecular beam epitaxy [1, 2]. Comparison of electron and hole charge dynamics in NC Ge flash memories has been discussed in .
As we know, the crystal size of semiconductor less than 100 nm can lead to a larger band gap and a change in dielectric constant. In the former work [8, 9], the effect of silicon grain size on the performance of thin-film transistors has been studied. To explore NC Ge in a memory device, it is worthy to study how the crystal size of NC Ge on charging dynamics works.
where mz* is the effective electron mass in the silicon along the tunneling direction; Ef-L and Ef-R are the Fermi levels of the left contact and the right contact, respectively. The transmission coefficient can be calculated using transfer matrix method. Thus, the tunneling current through the tunneling oxide layer and the gate leakage current can be calculated.
Results and discussion
In this letter, the effective electron mass 0.5 m0 of SiO2, 0.26 m0 of silicon, 0.23 m0 of amorphous Si (a-Si), 0.12 m0 of NC Ge , the relative dielectric constant of SiO2, Si, a-Si, and Ge of 3.9, 11.9, 13.5, and 16, respectively have been used in the calculations . The published electron affinities of crystalline silicon, amorphous silicon, SiO2, and Ge are 4.05, 3.93, 0.9, and 4.0 eV, respectively . In all calculations except the comparison between theory and experiment, the initial voltage across the total oxide containing NC Ge layer is 10 V, and the tunneling and control oxide thickness are 4 and 25 nm, respectively.
In conclusion, the stored charge and the charging current of NC Ge memory devices with the mean diameter of NC Ge being uniquely controlled by the nominal thickness of the deposition of Ge layer using molecular beam epitaxy are initially increased, then saturated and lastly, decreased with increasing dot size. It is caused by a compromise between the effects of the lowest conduction states and the capacitance of NC Ge layer on the tunneling. Theoretical analysis also demonstrates that the voltage across the tunneling oxide layer is initially kept constant, then slowly decreased and lastly, rapidly decreased with charging time. It is worthy of being noted that NC Ge memory devices may suffer from a small charging current, especially on a few nanometers, due to the change in the lowest conduction states and the capacitance of NC Ge layer.
LFM received the Ph.D degree in microelectronics and Solid State Electronics from the Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China in 2001. He is a professor in Soochow University. His research activities include modeling and characterization of quantum effects in MOSFETs and semiconductors, quantum devices, and the fabrication and modeling of integrated optic devices.
The author acknowledges the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant number 61076102 and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under grant number BK2012614.
- Szkutnik PD, Karmous A, Bassani F, Ronda A, Berbezier I, Gacem K, Hdiy AE, Troyon M: Ge nanocrystals formation on SiO2 by dewetting: application to memory. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 2008, 41: 103. 10.1051/epjap:2008006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hdiy AE, Gacem K, Troyon M, Ronda A, Bassani F, Berbezier I: Germanium nanocrystal density and size effects on carrier storage and emission. J Appl Phys 2008, 104: 063716. 10.1063/1.2985909View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akca IB, Dâna A, Aydinli A, Turan R: Comparison of electron and hole charge–discharge dynamics in germanium nanocrystal flash memories. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 052103. 10.1063/1.2835455View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Niquet YM, Allan G, Delerue C, Lannoo M: Quantum confinement in germanium nanocrystals. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 77: 1182. 10.1063/1.1289659View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weissker H-C, Furthmüller J, Bechstedt F: Optical properties of Ge and Si nanocrystallites from ab initio calculations. II. Hydrogenated nanocrystallites. Phys Rev B 2002, 65: 155328.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gacem K, Hdiy AE, Troyon M, Berbezier I, Szkutnik PD, Karmous A, Ronda A: Memory and Coulomb blockade effects in germanium nanocrystals embedded in amorphous silicon on silicon dioxide. J Appl Phys 2007, 102: 093704. 10.1063/1.2804013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang M, Chen TP, Wong JI, Ng CY, Liu Y, Ding L, Fung S, Trigg AD, Tung CH, Li CM: Charge trapping and retention behaviors of Ge nanocrystals distributed in the gate oxide near the gate synthesized by low-energy ion implantation. J Appl Phys 2007, 10: 124313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mao LF: The quantum size effects on the surface potential of nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistors. Thin Sol Films 2010, 518: 3396. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.10.143View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mao LF: Effects of the size of silicon grain on the gate-leakage current in nanocrystalline silicon thin-film transistors. J Vac Sci Technol 2010, 28: 460. 10.1116/1.3372328View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ando Y, Itoh T: Calculation of transmission tunneling current across arbitrary potential barriers. J Appl Phys 1987, 61: 1497. 10.1063/1.338082View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adikaari AADT, Carey JD, Stolojan V, Keddie JL, Silva SRP: Bandgap enhancement of layered nanocrystalline silicon from excimer laser crystallization. Nanotechnology 2006, 17: 5412. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/21/021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yue G, Kong G, Zhang D, Ma Z, Sheng S, Liao X: Dielectric response and its light-induced change in undoped a-Si:H films below 13 MHz. Phys Rev B 1998, 57: 2387. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.2387View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matsuura H, Okuno T, Okushi H, Tanaka K: Electrical properties of n-amorphous/p-crystalline silicon heterojunctions. J Appl Phys 1984, 55: 1012. 10.1063/1.333193View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.