Open Access

One-pot synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres by solvothermal method

Nanoscale Research Letters20138:213

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-213

Received: 19 March 2013

Accepted: 22 April 2013

Published: 6 May 2013


We have successfully prepared α-Fe2O3 nanospheres by solvothermal method using 2-butanone and water mixture solvent for the first time, which were about 100 nm in diameter and composed of very small nanoparticles. The as-prepared samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The results showed that the product was α-Fe2O3 nanosphere, and the temperature was an important factor on the formation of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres.


Solvothermal method Fe2O3 Nanospheres


In the past decade, iron oxides have attracted an enormous amount of interest because of their great scientific and technological importance in catalysts, pigments, and gas sensors [13]. Among these iron oxides, α-Fe2O3, which is the most stable iron oxide with n-type semiconducting properties under ambient conditions, is the most researched and most frequently polymorphed in nature as the mineral hematite. Hematite has a rhombohedrally centered hexagonal structure of the corundum type with a close-packed oxygen lattice in which two-thirds of the octahedral sites are occupied by Fe3+ ions [4]. Recently, a lot of researches have been carried out on α-Fe2O3 due to its low cost and nontoxic property as an anode material for lithium-ion secondary batteries [57]. In fact, all researches have almost focused on the preparation of α-Fe2O3 nanostructured materials, because nanoscale materials often exhibit physical and chemical properties that differ greatly from their bulk counterparts. Various α-Fe2O3 with nanostructures have been prepared, such as nanoparticles [5, 810], nanorods [11], nanotubes [12], flower-like structures [13], hollow spheres [14], nanowall arrays [15], dendrites [16], thin film [17, 18], and nanocomposites [1921].

In this work, we report one-pot method to prepare α-Fe2O3 nanospheres by solvothermal method using 2-butanone and water mixture solvent for the first time. The product is α-Fe2O3 nanosphere with an average diameter of approximately 100 nm, which is composed of a lot of very small nanoparticles. The temperature takes an important influence on the formation of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres.


In a typical experimental synthesis, 0.1 g of Fe(NO3)3∙9H2O (≥ 99.0%) was dissolved in 3 mL of deionized H2O under stirring. Then, 37 mL of 2-butanone was added to the above solution. The mixture was stirred for about 10 min and then was sealed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave (50-mL capacity). The autoclave was maintained in an oven at 140°C for 12 h. The crude product was washed with anhydrous ethanol three times and finally dried in a vacuum chamber at 60°C for 10 h. The products were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) performed on a Philips X'Pert diffractometer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Ǻ). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken on a JEOL JSM-6700F scanning electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were obtained on the JEOL-2010 transmission electron microscope operating at 200 kV. The corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were taken on a JEOL 2010 high-resolution TEM performing at 200 kV. The samples used for SEM, TEM, and HRTEM characterization were dispersed in absolute ethanol and were slightly ultrasonicated before observation.

Results and discussion

The phase purity of the product was examined by X-ray diffraction. Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of a typical sample. All peaks can be indexed to the standard rhombohedral hexagonal phase Fe2O3 (JCPDF Card No.86-0550 3 ¯ c and there are no additional peaks of impurities, indicating that it is pure α-Fe2O3.
Figure 1

XRD pattern of a typical sample.

The morphologies and microstructures of the typical sample have been studied by SEM and TEM. The SEM images (Figure 2) show that the product consists of well-dispersed spheres with a coarse surface. In the high magnification SEM image (Figure 2c, d), a great number of cracks on the surface of the spheres can be clearly observed, indicating the porous structure of the spheres with a diameter about 100 nm. In fact, every one sphere is composed of various smaller nanoparticles. The low and high magnification TEM images (Figure 3) also reveal that a lot of very small nanoparticles are loosely assembled to the nanosphere with an average diameter of about 100 nm, resulting into many gaps in these spheres. In other words, the SEM and TEM images together conform that the as-synthesized products are uniform nanospheres.
Figure 2

SEM images of the product obtained in a typical synthesis. (a-b) Low magnification, (c-d) high magnification.
Figure 3

TEM images of the product obtained in a typical synthesis. (a-b) Low magnification, (c-d) high magnification.

To further investigate the particular structure of the α-Fe2O3 nanospheres, the HRTEM images of the typical sample are demonstrated in Figure 4. It can be clearly observed that a lot of gaps exist in the product, and the average diameter of the nanoparticles is about 25 nm (Figure 4a). In fact, we can estimate the size of the crystalline grains by Scherrer formula as well. Based on the typical reflection of the (104) crystalline plane (Figure 1), the crystallite size was calculated to be about 27 nm. Obviously, the two results are almost the same. The HRTEM image shows resolved lattice fringes of (104) and (110) planes with a spacing of almost 0.27 and 0.25 nm (Figure 4b), consistent with the XRD results. The inset in Figure 4a shows the SAED pattern taken from the marked part, which can be indexed to a rhombohedral hexagonal phase (space group 3 ¯ c with lattice constants a = 0.5035 nm and c = 1.3747 nm.
Figure 4

Image of a single sphere. (a) TEM image and (b) HRTEM image. Inset shows the corresponding SAED image from the marked part in (a).

Moreover, the influence of reaction temperature on the product was investigated. Temperature plays a crucial role in the formation of well-defined spherical product. For example, keeping other experimental conditions the same with the typical synthesis when the temperature was reduced from 120°C to 80°C, significant morphology change was observed, which is shown in Figure 5. At 80°C, the obtained product was a nanorod (Figure 5a, b), which was FeOOH, similar to the previous work [22]. When the temperature was 100°C, the nanospheres were obtained (Figure 5c, d). However, under careful survey, we could find that the nanospheres were composed of many FeOOH nanorods. Increasing the reaction temperature to 120°C, the morphologies of the product (Figure 5e, f) were almost the same with the product in the typical synthesis except the inferior perfection.
Figure 5

SEM and TEM images of the products obtained at different reaction temperatures. (a-b) 80°C, (c-d) 100°C, (e-f) 120°C. Other conditions were the same as those in the typical synthesis.


In conclusion, we have successfully prepared α-Fe2O3 nanospheres by solvothermal method using 2-butanone and water mixture solvent for the first time, which are about 100 nm in diameter and are composed of very small Fe2O3 nanoparticles. The temperature takes an important influence on the formation of the α-Fe2O3 nanospheres. The as-fabricated α-Fe2O3 nanospheres are expected to be applied in nanocatalysts, nanosensors, and lithium-ion secondary batteries.

Authors’ information

CW got his PhD degree in 2012. He has devoted his effort in the research of two- and three-dimensional new materials for several years. His research interests focused on the fabrication and application of two and three-dimensional new materials. He has published his works in several important international journals. KT has main interest in superconductivity with high-temperature superconductors. YC mainly researches the preparation of new catalysts.



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos.: 91022033, 21171158, and 50903018) and the Foundation of Anhui Educational Committee (grant no.: KJ2012A217).

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Fuyang Normal College
Anhui Province Key Laboratory for Degradation and Monitoring of Pollution of the Environment
Department of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China


  1. Huo LH, Li W, Lu L, Cui HN, Xi SQ, Wang J, Zhao B, Shen YC, Lu ZH: Preparation, structure, and properties of three-dimensional ordered α-Fe2O3 nanoparticulate film. Chem Mater 2000, 12: 790–794. 10.1021/cm990690+View Article
  2. Gondal MA, Hameed A, Yamani ZH, Suwaiyan A: Laser induced photo-catalytic oxidation/splitting of water over α-Fe2O3, WO3, TiO2 and NiO catalysts: activity comparison. Chem Phys Lett 2004, 385: 111–115. 10.1016/j.cplett.2003.12.066View Article
  3. Han JS, Bredow T, Davey DE, Yu AB, Mulcahy DE: The effect of Al addition on the gas sensing properties of Fe2O3-based sensors. Sens Actuators B 2001, 75: 18–23. 10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00688-2View Article
  4. Zboril R, Mashlan M, Petridis D: Iron(III) oxides from thermal processes synthesis, structural and magnetic properties, Mössbauer spectroscopy characterization, and applications. Chem Mater 2002, 14: 969–982. 10.1021/cm0111074View Article
  5. Wang X, Gao L, Zheng H, Ji M, Shen T, Zhang Z: Fabrication and electrochemical properties of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. J Cryst Growth 2004, 269: 489–492. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.05.081View Article
  6. Larcher D, Masquelier C, Bonnin D, Chabre Y, Masson V, Leriche J-B, Tarascon J-M: Effect of particle size on lithium intercalation into α-Fe2O3. J Electrochem Soc 2003, 150: A133-A139. 10.1149/1.1528941View Article
  7. Poizot P, Laruelle S, Grugeon S, Dupont L, Tarascon JM: Nano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nature 2000, 407: 496–499. 10.1038/35035045View Article
  8. Wang PC, Ding HP, Bark T, Chen CH: Nanosized α-Fe2O3 and Li–Fe composite oxide electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 2007, 52: 6650–6655. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.072View Article
  9. NuLi Y, Zhang P, Guo Z, Liu H: Shape evolution of α-Fe2O3 and its size-dependent electrochemical properties for lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 2008, 155: A196-A200. 10.1149/1.2826278View Article
  10. NuLi Y, Zeng R, Zhang P, Guo Z, Liu H: Controlled synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanostructures and their size-dependent electrochemical properties for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 2008, 184: 456–461. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.03.004View Article
  11. Zeng S, Tang K, Li T: Controlled synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanorods and its size-dependent optical absorption, electrochemical, and magnetic properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 2007, 312: 513–521. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.03.046View Article
  12. Chen J, Xu L, Li W, Gou X: α-Fe2O3 nanotubes in gas sensor and lithium-ion battery applications. Adv Mater 2005, 17: 582–586. 10.1002/adma.200401101View Article
  13. NuLi Y, Zhang P, Guo Z, Munroe P, Liu H: Preparation of α-Fe2O3 submicro-flowers by a hydrothermal approach and their electrochemical performance in lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 2008, 53: 4213–4218. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.12.067View Article
  14. Wang B, Chen JS, Wu HB, Wang Z, Lou XW: Quasiemulsion-templated formation of α-Fe2O3 hollow spheres with enhanced lithium storage properties. J Amer Chem Soc 2011, 133: 17146–17148. 10.1021/ja208346sView Article
  15. Lei D, Zhang M, Qu B, Chen L, Wang Y, Zhang E, Xu Z, Li Q, Wang T: Small alpha-Fe2O3 nanowall arrays: hydrothermal preparation, growth mechanism and excellent rate performances for lithium ion batteries. Nanoscale 2012, 4: 3422–3426. 10.1039/c2nr30482aView Article
  16. Qingtao P, Kai H, Shibing N, Feng Y, Shumei L, Deyan H: Synthesis of α-Fe2O3 dendrites by a hydrothermal approach and their application in lithium-ion batteries. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2009, 42: 015417. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/1/015417View Article
  17. Sarradin J, Ribes M, Guessous A, Elkacemi K: Study of Fe2O3-based thin film electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. Solid State Ionics 1998, 112: 35–40. 10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00211-2View Article
  18. Wang L, Xu HW, Chen PC, Zhang DW, Ding CX, Chen CH: Electrostatic spray deposition of porous Fe2O3 thin films as anode material with improved electrochemical performance for lithium–ion batteries. J Power Sources 2009, 193: 846–850. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.03.063View Article
  19. Zhu X, Zhu Y, Murali S, Stoller MD, Ruoff RS: Nanostructured reduced graphene oxide/Fe2O3 composite as a high-performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 3333–3338. 10.1021/nn200493rView Article
  20. Wang G, Liu T, Luo Y, Zhao Y, Ren Z, Bai J, Wang H: Preparation of Fe2O3/graphene composite and its electrochemical performance as an anode material for lithium ion batteries. J Alloys Compound 2011, 509: L216-L220. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.151View Article
  21. Huang Y, Dong Z, Jia D, Guo Z, Cho WI: Electrochemical properties of α-Fe2O3/MWCNTs as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Solid State Ionics 2011, 201: 54–59. 10.1016/j.ssi.2011.07.018View Article
  22. Zhong Z, Ho J, Teo J, Shen S, Gedanken A: Synthesis of porous α-Fe2O3 nanorods and deposition of very small gold particles in the pores for catalytic oxidation of CO. Chem Mater 2007, 19: 4776–4782. 10.1021/cm071165aView Article


© Wang et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.