Broadband Ge/SiGe quantum dot photodetector on pseudosubstrate

  • Andrew Yakimov1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Victor Kirienko1,

      Affiliated with

      • Vladislav Armbrister1 and

        Affiliated with

        • Anatolii Dvurechenskii1

          Affiliated with

          Nanoscale Research Letters20138:217

          DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-217

          Received: 26 March 2013

          Accepted: 24 April 2013

          Published: 8 May 2013

          Abstract

          We report the fabrication and characterization of a ten-period Ge quantum dot photodetector grown on SiGe pseudosubstrate. The detector exhibits tunable photoresponse in both 3- to 5- μ m and 8- to 12- μ m spectral regions with responsivity values up to about 1 mA/W at a bias of −3 V and operates under normal incidence radiation with background limited performance at 100 K. The relative response in the mid- and long-wave atmospheric windows could be controlled through the applied voltage.

          Keywords

          Quantum dots Silicon Germanium Interband transitions Infrared photodetectors

          Background

          There is an increasing need for sources and detectors for mid-infrared (IR) spectral region due to the broad range of medical and industrial applications such as measurement of skin temperature, detection of cancer or infection, air pollution monitoring, meteorological research, and remote temperature sensing. Quantum well infrared photodetectors (QWIPs) utilizing intersubband transitions have been successful in these applications [1]. The intersubband transition energy in the quantum well is easily tunable by varying the quantum well width and barrier height. Also, there is a potential for the fabrication of uniform detector arrays with large area. However, QWIPs have drawbacks such as intrinsic insensitivity to the normal incidence radiation and a relatively large dark current.

          In the past several years, there has been a surge of interest in nanostructures that exhibit quantum confinement in three dimensions, which are known as quantum dots (QDs). With respect to quantum wells, the additional in-plane confinement of carriers and the peaked density of states in QDs lead to attractive properties in the mid-wave (3 to 5 μ m) and long-wave (8 to 12 μ m) IR regions where the Earth’s atmosphere has its major transmission windows [2]. The potential advantages of the quantum dot infrared photodetectors (QDIPs) as compared with two-dimensional systems are the following [3, 4]: (1) increased sensitivity to normally incident radiation as a result of breaking of the polarization selection rules, so eliminating the need for reflectors, gratings, or optocouplers, (2) expected large photoelectric gain associated with a reduced capture probability of photoexcited carriers due to suppression of electron-phonon scattering, and (3) small thermal generation rate, resulting from zero-dimensional character of the electronic spectrum, that renders a much improved signal-to-noise ratio. Most of the demonstrations of QDIPs were achieved with III-V self-assembled heterostuctures. SiGe-based QDIPs represent another attractive type of the device due to its compatibility with the standard Si readout circuitry. At present, the most highly developed technology for fabricating arrays of SiGe-based QDs utilizes strain-driven epitaxy of Ge nanoclusters on Si(001) surface [5]. The photoresponse of Ge/Si heterostructures with QDs in the mid-wave atmospheric window was observed by several groups [610] and attributed to the transitions from the hole states bound in Ge QDs to continuum states of the Si matrix. Recently, we have reported on the photovoltaic operation of ten-period Ge/Si(001) QDIPs with Johnson noise-limited detectivity as high as 8×1010 cm Hz 1/2/W measured at photon wavelength (λ)=3.4 μ m and at 90 K under normal incidence IR radiation [11]. The cutoff wavelength at the low energy side of the responsivity of such QDIPs was limited to about 5 μ m.

          There are only few works announcing the long-wave operation of detectors based on Ge/Si quantum dots [9, 1214]. Since the long-wavelength photoresponse in this system originates from the bound-to-bound intraband transitions, superior performance of such devices is unlikely, and one is obliged to seek another approach. Recently, the fabrication and characterization of a mid-IR QWIP on SiGe pseudosubstrate or virtual substrate (VS) were reported [15]. The use of the pseudosubstrate was found to lead to an increase in design freedom of quantum well devices and thus the possibility to improve their parameters. In this work, we demonstrate that the technologically important range between 8 and 12 μ m can be reached by the use of self-assembled Ge QDs grown on the relaxed Si 1−xGe x layer (x = 0.4). The Ge/SiGe QDIP on SiGe VS displays a longer cutoff wavelength (approximately 12 μ m) and broader detection range as compared to conventional Ge/Si QDIPs due to smaller effective valence band offset at the Ge/Si 1−xGe x interface.

          Methods

          Figure 1 shows schematically the structure of the detector discussed in this paper. The samples were grown by solid source molecular beam epitaxy on a (001)-oriented boron-doped p +-Si substrate with resistivity of 0.004 Ω cm. For the fabrication of a virtual substrate with SiGe buffer layers, a method using a reverse grading by a two-step growth procedure was employed [16]. The fully relaxed Si 0.6Ge 0.4 VS was grown at 550°C on a Si 0.5Ge 0.5 layer which is only partially relaxed. The Si 0.5Ge 0.5 seed layer was deposited at low temperature of 350°C; its thickness t was such so as to keep a residual compressive strain and chosen to have a negligible lattice mismatch with the final Si 0.6Ge 0.4 VS. In our structure, t was adjusted to be 300 nm as determined from separate Raman measurements.
          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-217/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1466_Fig1_HTML.jpg
          Figure 1

          Device structure of the QDIP on SiGe virtual substrate (VS). The structure is that of a quantum dot infrared detector with ten layers of Ge QDs in a SiGe matrix.

          The active region of the device was composed of ten stacks of Ge quantum dots separated by 35-nm Si 0.6Ge 0.4 barriers grown on top of the virtual substrate. Each Ge QD layer consisted of a nominal Ge thickness of about 0.55 nm and formed by self-assembling in the Stranski-Krastanov growth mode at 500°C and at a growth rate of 0.02 nm/s. From scanning tunneling microscopy experiments with uncapped samples, we observed the Ge dots to be approximately 10 to 15 nm in lateral size and about 1.0 to 1.5 nm in height. The density of the dots is about 3 to 4 × 1011 cm −2. The active region was sandwiched in between the 200-nm-thick intrinsic Si 0.6Ge 0.4 buffer and cap layers grown at 550°C. Finally, a 200-nm-thick p +-Si 0.6Ge 0.4 top contact layer (3×1018 cm −3) was deposited. The p-type remote doping of the dots was achieved with a boron δ-doping layer inserted 5 nm above each dot layer, providing after spatial transfer approximately three holes per dot. For vertical photocurrent (PC) measurements, the sample was processed into 700×700 μ m2 mesas by optical photolithography and contacted by Al/Si metallization. The bottom contact is defined as the ground when applying voltage to the detector.

          The normal incidence photoresponse was obtained using a Bruker Vertex 70 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Ettlingen, Germany) with a spectral resolution of 5 cm −1 along with a SR570 low-noise current preamplifier (Stanford Research Systems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The PC spectra were calibrated with a DLaTGS detector (SELEX Galileo Inc., Arlington, VA, USA). The dark current was measured as a function of bias U b by a Keithley 6430 Sub-Femtoamp Remote SourceMeter (Cleveland, OH, USA). The devices were mounted in a cold finger inside a Specac cryostat (Orpington, Kent, UK) with ZnSe windows.

          Results and discussion

          The detector dark current as a function of bias voltage, presented in Figure 2, was measured with a cold shield to eliminate background radiation for various temperatures from 90 to 120 K. Also shown in Figure 2 is the photocurrent measured at 80 K with the device illuminated from the 300-K background radiation (field of view = 53°). From these measurements, one can estimate the background limited performance (BLIP) temperature TBLIP for our detector. Experimentally, TBLIP can be estimated from comparing the dark current curves with the photocurrent characteristics obtained by allowing the 300-K radiation through the Dewar window [1]. In Figure 2, we can see that the current from the background radiation is equal to the dark current at 100 K and negative bias. This temperature is higher than that measured for Ge/Si QDIP [13] and GeSi/Si QWIP [17] operating in long-wave IR region and exceeds TBLIP found for many n-type InAs QD-based detectors [1821].
          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-217/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1466_Fig2_HTML.jpg
          Figure 2

          The bias dependence of dark current measured at temperatures from 80 to 120 K. The dashed line represents the response to a 300-K background radiation through the Dewar window (field of view = 53°). BLIP prevails at 100 K for negative bias voltage.

          Figure 3 shows the normal incidence spectral response at 90 K for different bias voltages. At zero bias, no signal is observed implying the device operates in a photoconductive mode [22], and at biases just above 3.5 V, the signal becomes too noisy to detect PC. Ge/SiGe QDIP is of wide detection window with the cutoff wavelength of about 12 μ m instead of 5 to 6 μ m for Ge/Si QDIPs of similar device structure [11]. Since the sample in FTIR experiments is simultaneously exposed to a wide range of photon energies, the spectra may display additional transitions due to two-photon processes [9]. The near-infrared photons with energies larger than the SiGe bandgap create electrons and holes mostly in the SiGe barrier. The nonequilibrium holes diffuse from the SiGe bulk towards the Ge QDs and are accumulated in the dots. Then, by absorbing the mid-infrared photons, the photoexcited holes may contribute to the mid-infrared PC. To check this assumption, a 2.5- μ m optical low-pass filter was introduced in front of the sample to eliminate the photons which may cause band-to-band transitions in the Si and SiGe layers. The long-wave part of the photoresponse remains unchanged. Thus, we conclude that the observed redshift is a result of smaller effective valence band offset at the Ge/Si 1−xGe x interface. By an analogy with the behavior of Ge/Si QDIPs [11], the near-infrared response at λ<2 μ m is ascribed to the interband transitions between the electrons in the δ valleys of SiGe layers and the holes at the Γ point of Ge QDs. The mid-infrared signal at λ>3 μ m is associated with the hole intraband transitions which involve the dot bound states.
          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-217/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1466_Fig3_HTML.jpg
          Figure 3

          Responsivity spectra under different applied biases of Ge/SiGe QDIP. The applied voltages are ±0.05, ±0.1, ±0.5, ±1.0, ±1.5, ±2.0, ±2.5, and −3.0 V. The sample temperature is 90 K.

          The bias voltage dependence of the relative photoresponse Rlong/Rmid is plotted in Figure 4a, where Rlong is the PC integrated over the long-wave window from 8 to 12 μ m, and Rmid is the integral response in the mid-wave region from 3 to 5 μ m. As can be seen in Figure 4a, the relative intensity of the device response in major atmospheric windows can be strongly varied by changing the bias voltage. In mid-infrared region, at low bias, only the signal around 5 μ m is clearly visible, indicating excitation of holes into the valence band continuum states where the holes can easily reach the contact. As the applied voltage is increased, the PC at longer wavelength appears and grows rapidly, and at |U b |>2 V, both mid- and long-wave signals become comparable. We suppose that the long-wave photoresponse is caused by the excitation of holes to a shallow level confined in QD near the valence band edge with subsequent field-assisted tunneling through a barrier.
          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-217/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1466_Fig4_HTML.jpg
          Figure 4

          Relative photoresponse and responsivity. (a) Relative photoresponse of the device in long- and mid-wave regions. (b) Responsivity at λ=5 and 8 μ m as a function of applied bias. Solid curves are the best fit of experimental data to expression (1). The sample temperature is 90 K.

          To check this interpretation, the voltage dependence of the mid-wave photoresponse (λ = 5 μ m) and long-wave PC (λ = 8 μ m) was analyzed separately. The inherent feature of tunneling mechanism of carrier escape is the exponential dependence of PC intensity I on the applied voltage. Finkman and co-workers [9] proposed a simple equation which follows from the WKB approximation:
          I = I 0 exp 4 3 2 m 2 V B 3 d q ( U b + U 0 ) , http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-217/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1466_Equ1_HTML.gif
          (1)

          where I0 is the intensity prefactor, m is the hole effective mass, V B is the tunneling barrier height, d is the contact separation, U0 is the built-in voltage, and q is the elementary charge. The results of the fitting analysis for both bias polarities are presented in Figure 4b by solid lines. It is clear that the 5- μ m PC is not characterized well by Equation 1. On the contrary, the theoretical curves show good agreement with the 8- μ m experimental data. From the best fit, we derive the barrier height V B =12 meV for negative bias and 19 meV for positive bias. The built-in voltage was found to be U0=0.68 and 0.94 V for U b <0 and U b >0, respectively. These values are typical for p-type Ge/Si QDIPs [9].

          Figure 5 shows the spectral response measured with an applied voltage of 2 V in the temperature range of 90 to 120 K. The long-wave signal rapidly decreases at high temperatures because the probability of occupation of the dot excited states increases with temperature thus blocking the interlevel transitions.
          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-217/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1466_Fig5_HTML.jpg
          Figure 5

          Responsivity spectra measured at temperatures from 90 to 120 K. The applied voltage is 2 V.

          Conclusions

          In summary, we report a normal incidence broadband mid-IR Ge/SiGe quantum dot photodetector on SiGe virtual substrate with a background limited performance at 100 K. The detector exhibits photoresponse in both the 3- to 5- μ m and 8- to 12- μ m spectral regions. The operating wavelength range of the device can be varied via the bias voltage. The long-wave responsivity measured at 90 K (approximately 1 mA/W) is higher or comparable to previously reported values for Ge/Si QDIPs [13, 14] and SiGe/Si QWIPs [23] at much lower temperatures (10 to 20 K). The proposed device is compatible with the existing Si readout circuitry and suitable for monolithic focal plane array applications.

          Abbreviations

          BLIP: 

          background-limited-performance

          FTIR: 

          Fourier transform infrared

          IR: 

          infrared

          PC: 

          photocurrent

          QD: 

          quantum dot

          QDIP: 

          quantum dot infrared photodetector

          QWIP: 

          quantum well infrared photodetector

          λ: 

          photon wavelength.

          Declarations

          Acknowledgements

          This work was supported by RFBR (grant no. 13-02-12002).

          Authors’ Affiliations

          (1)
          Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

          References

          1. Levine BF: Quantum well infrared photodetectors. J Appl Phys 1993, 74: R1-R81. 10.1063/1.354252View Article
          2. Passmore BS, Wu J, Manasreh MO, Salamo GJ: Dual broadband photodetector based on interband and intersubband transitions in InAs quantum dots embedded in graded InGaAs quantum wells. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91(23):233508. 10.1063/1.2822412View Article
          3. Ryzhii V: Physical model and analysis of quantum dot infrared photodetectors with blocking layer. J Appl Phys 2001, 89: 5117–5124. 10.1063/1.1359759View Article
          4. Phillips J: Evaluation of the fundamental properties of quantum dot infrared detectors. J Appl Phys 2002, 91: 4590–4594. 10.1063/1.1455130View Article
          5. Brunner K: Si/Ge nanostructures. Rep Prog Phys 2002, 65: 27–72. 10.1088/0034-4885/65/1/202View Article
          6. Yakimov AI, Dvurechenskii AV, Proskuryakov YY, Nikiforov AI, Pchelyakov OP, Teys SA, Gutakovskii AK: Normal-incidence infrared photoconductivity in Si p-i-n diode with embedded Ge self-assembled quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett 1999, 75(10):1413–1415. 10.1063/1.124710View Article
          7. Miesner C, Röthig O, Brunner K, Abstreiter G: Intra-valence band photocurrent spectroscopy of self-assembled Ge dots in Si. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76(8):1027–1029. 10.1063/1.125927View Article
          8. Bougeard D, Brunner K, Abstreiter G: Intraband photoresponse of SiGe quantum dot/quantum well multilayers. Physica E 2003, 16: 609–613. 10.1016/S1386-9477(02)00640-9View Article
          9. Finkman E, Shuall N, Vardi A, Thanh VL, Schacham SE: Interlevel transitions and two-photon processes in Ge/Si quantum dot photocurrent. J Appl Phys 2008, 103: 093114. 10.1063/1.2919151View Article
          10. Singha RK, Manna S, Das S, Dhar A, Ray SK: Room temperature infrared photoresponse of self assembled Ge/Si (001) quantum dots grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 233113. 10.1063/1.3446848View Article
          11. Yakimov A, Timofeev V, Bloshkin A, Nikiforov A, Dvurechenskii A: Photovoltaic Ge/Si quantum dot detectors operating in the mid-wave atmospheric window (3 to 5 μm). Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 494. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-494View Article
          12. Rappaport N, Finkman E, Brunhes T, Boucaud P, Sauvage S, Yam N, Thanh VL, Bouchier D: Intra-valence band photocurrent spectroscopy of self-assembled Ge dots in Si. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 77: 3224–3226. 10.1063/1.1326044View Article
          13. Peng YH, Chen CC, Kuan CH, Cheng HH: Ge quantum dots sandwiched between two thick Si blocking layers to block the dark current and tune the responsivity spectrum. Solid-State Electron 2003, 47: 1775–1780. 10.1016/S0038-1101(03)00136-9View Article
          14. Lin CH, Yu CH, Peng CY, Ho W, Liu C: Broadband SiGe/Si quantum dot infrared photodetectors. J Appl Phys 2007, 101: 033117. 10.1063/1.2433768View Article
          15. Rauter P, Fromherz T, Falub C, Grützmacher D, Bauer G: SiGe quantum well infrared photodetectors on pseudosubstrate. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 081115. 10.1063/1.3089817View Article
          16. Capellini G, Seta MD, Busby Y, Pea M, Evangelisti F, Nicotra G, Spinella C, Nardone M, Ferrari C: Strain relaxation in high Ge content SiGe layers deposited on Si. J Appl Phys 2010, 107: 063504. 10.1063/1.3327435View Article
          17. People R, Bean JC, Beathea CG, Sputz SK, Peticolas LJ: Broadband (8–14 μm), normal incidence, pseudomorphic GexSi1−x/Si strained-layer infrared photodetector operating between 20 and 77 K. Appl Phys Lett 1992, 61: 1122–1124. 10.1063/1.107688View Article
          18. Krishna S, Raghavan S, von Winckel G, Rotella P, Stintz A, Morath CP, Le D, Kennerly SW: Two color InAs/InGaAs dots-in-a-well detector with background-limited performance at 91 K. Appl Phys Lett 2003, 82: 2574–2576. 10.1063/1.1567806View Article
          19. Chou ST, Wu MC: Influence of doping density on the normal incident absorption of quantum-dot infrared photodetectors. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 173511. 10.1063/1.2199589View Article
          20. Nevou L, Liverini V, Castellano F, Bismuto A, Faist J: Asymmetric heterostructure for photovoltaic InAs quantum dot infrared photodetector. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 023505. 10.1063/1.3462960View Article
          21. Barve AV, Krishna S: Photovoltaic quantum dot quantum cascade infrared photodetector. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 100: 021105. 10.1063/1.3675905View Article
          22. Tang SF, Lin SY, Lee SC: Near-room-temperature operation of an InAs/GaAs quantum-dot infrared photodetector. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 78(17):2428–2430. 10.1063/1.1362201View Article
          23. Rauter P, Mussler G, Grützmacher D, Fromherz T: Tensile strained SiGe quantum well infrared photodetectors based on a light-hole ground state. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 211106. 10.1063/1.3593134View Article

          Copyright

          © Yakimov et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

          This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.