Open Access

SERS substrates formed by gold nanorods deposited on colloidal silica films

  • Mikhail Yu Tsvetkov1,
  • Boris N Khlebtsov2,
  • Vitaly A Khanadeev2,
  • Victor N Bagratashvili1,
  • Peter S Timashev1,
  • Mikhail I Samoylovich3 and
  • Nikolai G Khlebtsov2, 4Email author
Contributed equally
Nanoscale Research Letters20138:250

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-250

Received: 16 April 2013

Accepted: 15 May 2013

Published: 22 May 2013


We describe a new approach to the fabrication of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrates using gold nanorod (GNR) nanopowders to prepare concentrated GNR sols, followed by their deposition on an opal-like photonic crystal (OPC) film formed on a silicon wafer. For comparative experiments, we also prepared GNR assemblies on plain silicon wafers. GNR-OPC substrates combine the increased specific surface, owing to the multilayer silicon nanosphere structure, and various spatial GNR configurations, including those with possible plasmonic hot spots. We demonstrate here the existence of the optimal OPC thickness and GNR deposition density for the maximal SERS effect. All other things being equal, the analytical integral SERS enhancement of the GNR-OPC substrates is higher than that of the thick, randomly oriented GNR assemblies on plain silicon wafers. Several ways to further optimize the strategy suggested are discussed.


SERS Gold nanorod Silica nanosphere Plasmonic nanopowder Rhodamine 6G


Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is a sensitive spectroscopic method to detect molecular vibrations on or near metallic surfaces supporting plasmonic excitation [1, 2]. At present, it is generally accepted that the SERS spectra can be greatly enhanced, owing to the two mechanisms [3, 4]. Specifically, the electromagnetic mechanism [3] is related to the local resonant plasmonic fields near metal nanostructures [5], whereas the so-called chemical contribution [4] is due to the formation of a charge transfer adsorption band between the Raman scattering molecules and the metallic surface (for the discussion of the well-known publication by Fleischman et al. [6] and the early history of SERS, see, e.g., [7]). The electromagnetic mechanism makes the major contribution to the SERS effect because it is both the incident and the Raman emitted field that are enhanced by the plasmonic nanostructures on the surface, thus leading to the well-known fourth-power law [2].

Since its discovery, the SERS technique has found numerous applications in chemical and biological sensing [8, 9] (including single-molecule detection [10, 11]), molecular and reaction dynamics [12], and biomedicine [13]. To date, the physical principles of SERS, its experimental implementation, and its applications in fundamental and applied sciences have been extensively reviewed [1421]; the readers are referred to these reviews and the books [1, 2, 8].

Despite the enormous number of SERS-related publications, all the currently used SERS platforms can be placed into one of the following four broad classes determined according to the underlying fabrication method: (1) regular metal nanolithographic nanostructures [22, 23], (2) metallic nanostructures obtained with the appropriate nanosized templates (‘film-over-spheres’ platforms) [2430], (3) metal nanoparticles (NPs) assembled on plain substrates (e.g., silicon or glass) [3134], and (4) ‘SERS tags’ that combine plasmonic NPs and specific Raman reporter organic molecules [15, 21, 35].

The fabricated SERS substrate should ensure several key features [33, 36]: (1) high SERS enhancement and sensitivity, (2) large-scale uniformity, with the integral SERS enhancement variations over the entire substrate surface being less than 10% to 20%, (3) high stability and reproducibility between fabrication runs, and (4) low fabrication costs.

Owing to the presence of electromagnetic ‘hot spots’ near interparticle gaps, local SERS enhancements can be as high as 1011[36, 37], but the surface-averaged enhancement is usually 3 orders of magnitude lower, about 108 in the best experiments [38]. Moreover, these enhancements are unevenly distributed over wide areas. For example, Fang et al. [39] showed that the enhancement distribution could vary between 2.8 × 104 and 4.1 × 1010, where the hot spots accounted for 0.0063% of the total number of sites examined but contributed about 24% to the average SERS intensity. This means that the major part of the recorded intensity can be due to the negligible percentage of the Raman molecules adsorbed just at these hottest sites. That is why numerous efforts were reported to develop various methods for the nanofabrication of large-scale SERS substrates possessing high and homogeneous electromagnetic enhancement [17, 18].

Although multistage lithographic or patterning techniques produce the most reproducible SERS substrates, these methods are not cost-effective. Moreover, the lithographic SERS substrates can provide only a moderate enhancement as compared with some random assemblies [40]. In common practice, SERS substrates of the second type are fabricated by depositing a thin metal layer onto a self-assembled colloidal crystal. The plasmonic and SERS properties of such substrates are determined by the size of the colloidal templates used and the thickness of the deposited metal film. The film-over-spheres method allows the substrate structure to be precisely controlled, with the number of the necessary fabrication steps being minimal, which makes this technique more cost-effective. Furthermore, these substrates retain their SERS activity for months, even after their being exposed to high temperatures. For example, quite recently, Greeneltch et al. [41, 42] have fabricated a new type of plasmonic SERS substrates in the form of silver or gold nanorods immobilized on silica or polystyrene microspheres covered by thin silver or gold films. This method produces radially oriented SERS-active pillars separated by small gaps. The surface plasmon resonance of such substrates was shown to be capable of being tuned from 330 to 1,840 nm by varying the microsphere diameter. For optimized substrates, the large-scale SERS enhancement was about 108 under near-infrared (NIR) excitation (1,064 nm).

More recently, considerable interest has been aroused in novel nanoprobes named SERS tags [16, 21] that combine plasmonic metal nanoparticles and organic Raman reporter molecules. Such SERS-active nanoprobes produce strong, characteristic Raman signals and can be used as convenient Raman labels for the indirect sensing of the target molecules by various versions of laser microscopic Raman spectrometry. In a sense, these Raman labels can be used in the same way as external chromophores, such as quantum dots or fluorescent dyes.

Perhaps the most simple and cost-effective strategy for the manufacture of SERS substrates is to fabricate self-assembled nanoparticle films (or metal islands [43, 44]) on a plain supporting surface. Owing to the advances in synthesis technologies, there exist a lot of chemical protocols to fabricate metal nanoparticles differing in size, shape, structure, and composition [4547]. In particular, plasmonic nanopowders [48, 49] seem to be quite suitable for the simple and low-cost fabrication of SERS platforms based on random nanoparticle assemblies [50]. One of the obvious advantages of plasmonic nanopowders is that they retain their plasmonic properties under usual conditions; they can be easily dispersed in water to obtain sols of the desired concentration in a matter of seconds without any sonication, heating, etc. In particular, we have already utilized GNR powders to fabricate monolayer and fractal-like plasmonic films for SERS applications [33]. However, these substrates demonstrated a moderate analytical enhancement [42] averaged over the probe laser beam spot. One of the possible reasons was too small a number of the analyte molecules in the thin layers probed by the laser light.

In this work, we used gold nanorod (GNR) nanopowders [48] to prepare concentrated GNR sols that were then employed to deposit GNRs on an opal-like photonic crystal (OPC) film formed on a silicon wafer. Such GNR-OPC substrates combine the increased specific surface, owing to the multilayer nanosphere structure, and various spatial GNR configurations, including those with possible plasmonic hot spots [5, 51]. We demonstrate here the existence of the optimal GNR deposition density for the maximal SERS effect, which turned out to be higher than that for the thick random GNR assemblies [33] formed directly on a plain silicon wafer.


The gold nanorods were fabricated by the seed-mediated method, following Nikoobakht and El-Sayed [52], with minor modifications [53]. Briefly, the seed solution was obtained by mixing 10 mL of 0.1 M cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and 250 μL of 10 mM HAuCl4, followed by adding 1 mL of ice-cold 10 mM NaBH4. The seeds were aged for 2 h. The GNRs were obtained by mixing 900 mL of 0.1 M CTAB, 50 mL of 10 mM HAuCl4, 20 ml of 4 mM AgNO3, 10 mL of 0.1 M AsA, 10 ml of 1 M HCl, and 10 mL of the seed solution. The mixture was aged at 30°C for 48 h until an orange-red suspension was formed. We thereby obtained 1 L of a GNR sol with the longitudinal plasmon resonance at 810 to 820 nm and a total gold concentration of 85 mg/L.

The GNR sols were centrifuged twice at 16,000 × g for 1 h and then redispersed in water to remove the excess CTAB molecules. The pH of the GNR sols was adjusted to 9 by adding 0.2 M K2CO3, followed by the addition of methoxy(polyethylene glycol)-thiol (mPEG-SH; MW 5,000, Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, USA) at a final concentration of 10 nM. The mixture was allowed to react overnight. The PEGylated (mPEG-SH-modified) rods were centrifuged at 16,000×g for 60 min and then redispersed in water to remove nonspecifically bound PEG molecules. The PEGylated GNRs were again centrifuged at 16,000×g for 1 h and redispersed in a small amount of water to a concentration of 5 g/L. To completely remove CTAB and unreacted PEG, the nanoparticles were dialyzed for 72 h, fresh water being added to them several times. Finally, these dialyzed, PEGylated, and concentrated GNRs were transferred to a sterile bottle, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and freeze-dried overnight under vacuum. The measured zeta potential of the as-prepared and redispersed PEGylated GNRs was about −20 mV. For details, the readers are referred to [48, 49].

The absorption spectra of the GNRs were recorded with a Specord 250 BU UV-visible-NIR spectrometer (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the nanoparticles were obtained with a Libra-120 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The zetapotential of the particles was measured before and after drying with a Zetasizer Nano-ZS instrument (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK).

The silica spheres were fabricated by the Stöber method [54] by adding the desired amount (from 0.1 to 1 mL) of 25% aqua ammonia to 10 mL of absolute ethanol and then magnetically stirring (500 rpm) the solution obtained for 5 min at room temperature. Thereafter, 0.3 mL of tetraethyl orthosilicate was added dropwise, and the suspension was stirred for 1 h and then left to stay overnight without stirring. The size of the silica spheres (200 nm in our case) is governed by the amount of ammonia added. The fabricated silica spheres were deposited by spin coating at 2,000 rpm on silicon wafers by means of a homemade centrifuge and then heat-treated [55].

The substrates were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a JSM-6700 F instrument (JEOL, Akishima-shi, Japan), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and absorption spectroscopy with a Shimadzu UV-3600 UV–vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The AFM images were obtained with an INTEGRA-Therma AFM microscope (NT-MDT, Moscow, Russia) operated in the semicontact and phase-contrast modes. The overall resolution was 512 × 512 points for a 2 × 2 μm2 region. The SERS spectra were measured with an HR800 micro-Raman spectrometer (HORIBA, Jobin Yvon, Kyoto, Japan) combined with a laser confocal microscope. To estimate the thickness of the silica film, we used the microscope of the HR800 spectrometer equipped with a ×100 objective. By comparing between the film images obtained with the microscope focused onto the inner and outer film boundaries, we found that each spin coating run formed one to three layers of silica spheres on the wafer.

To fabricate SERS substrates, we used concentrated GNR sols obtained by the redispersion of 12 mg of GNP powder in 1 mL of distilled water. A drop of a GNR sol of controllable volume was placed on a film of silica spheres on a silicon wafer and dried at room temperature. This process was repeated several times to attain the desired surface and volume densities of the GNRs embedded in and deposited on the OPC film. For comparative purposes, we also fabricated SERS substrates by depositing GNR sols differing in concentration directly on plain silicon wafers as described previously in [33].

Results and discussion

Properties of GNR powders

Figure 1a shows a TEM image of a GNP nanopowder redispersed in water. The size and shape of the nanoparticles practically do not differ from those the as-prepared GNRs had before freeze-drying. Accordingly, there are no essential differences between the extinction spectra of the samples recorded prior to and after freeze-drying (Figure 1b). Both spectra reveal a typical longitudinal plasmon resonance near 820 nm and a minor transverse resonance maximum around 510 nm. The high ratio between the longitudinal and transverse resonance amplitudes points to the high quality of the samples and to the minor presence of by-product particles therein [56].
Figure 1

TEM image, extinction spectra, GNR length distribution histogram, and GNR diameter distribution histogram. (a) TEM image of a GNR powder redispersed in water. (b) Extinction spectra of the as-prepared GNRs and GNR powder after freeze-drying. (c) GNR length distribution histogram. (d) GNR diameter distribution histogram. The average length and diameter of GNRs are both in nanometers.

The powdered GNR particles have a typical cigar-like shape; their length and diameter distributions are shown in Figure 1c,d, respectively. According to the results of reckoning for 600 particles, they are 44.8 ± 7.6 nm in length and 11.2 ± 2.3 nm in diameter. Their distinctive feature is high solubility at high concentrations (up to 50 mg/mL), hundreds of times as high as the typical concentrations attainable with seed-mediated synthesis [52, 53, 57].

Formation and characterization of silica films

According to the data of [58], the typical size polydispersity of the Stöber spheres (100 to 200 nm in diameter), as determined in terms of the full width at half maximum Δd/dmax, is about 20% (see, e.g., panels c and d in Figure three in [58]). Because of the surface defects, the first spin-coated layers were inhomogeneous, with some ordered islands present. After 5 to 10 spin coating cycles, there formed more ordered structures similar to the opal-like photonic crystals [59, 60] (Figure 2a,b,c).

As the number of the spin-coated layers of silica spheres was increased, there formed ordered structures characterized by a typical photonic bandgap appearing in their reflectance spectrum (Figure 2d). Because of the intrinsic polydispersity of the Stöber silica spheres and packing defects, the photonic bandgap width in Figure 2d is significantly greater than that for true high-contrast photonic crystals [61]. Nevertheless, even a partial orderliness in thick opal-like films gives a characteristic spectrum with a bandgap near 500 nm. Increasing the film thickness augmented the contribution from SiO2 to the SERS spectra recorded.
Figure 2

SEM and AFM images of opal-like photonic crystals and the bandgap zone. Respective SEM (a, b) and AFM (c) images of thin (a) and thick (b, c) opal-like photonic crystals formed by depositing 200-nm silica spheres by spin coating on a silicon substrate. (d) The bandgap zone centered around 500 nm as revealed from the reflectance spectrum.

GNR-Si and GNR-OPC substrates

For comparative measurements, we used densely packed and fractal-like GNR films deposited on silicon wafers. The structure of such substrates is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1. In particular, the fractal-like GNR assemblies were shown to have a maximum SERS enhancement in comparison with single-particle and densely packed monolayers [33]. For dilute GNR sols, the GNR assemblies demonstrated an island structure after deposition on a silicon wafer and drying in air (see, for example, Additional file 1: Figure S2). It should be emphasized that the plasmonic properties of single GNRs and GNR assemblies differ substantially because of the strong electromagnetic coupling between neighboring particles [62] (Additional file 1: Figure S3). It follows from Additional file 1: Figure S3 that the interaction of particles in dense films leads to the broadening and red shifting of the principal longitudinal dipole resonance and reduction of its magnitude. What is more, there emerge minor resonances due to the higher (nondipole) modes of plasmonic excitations. The abovementioned sudden change in the plasmon spectra of films formed from nanorods is a negative factor from the standpoint of SERS applications. Note for comparison that the more complex techniques of application of metal films over 2-D colloidal silica or polystyrene crystals provide for a controllable plasmonic shift towards the near-IR region without any serious impairment of the spectral quality.

To obtain GNR-OPC substrates, we prepared nanorod sols with a GNR powder concentration of 12 mg/mL in water. This concentration approximately corresponded to the maximum enhancement of the SERS spectra of rhodamine 6G and 4-aminthiophenol (see Additional file 1: Figure S4). During the course of deposition, the GNRs gradually filled up the interstitial space. While the amount of the deposited particles was small, they completely entered into pores, with only solitary particles remaining on the surface (Figure 3a). Thereafter, islands of gold nanorods formed on the film surface that overlapped at the points of contact between silica spheres (Figure 3b). Finally, when the amount of the deposited GNRs became large enough, we observed some kind of plain GNR film without any fingerprints of silica spheres (Figure 3c). Note that we purposefully selected in Figure 3 an irregular area of silica spheres with large pores in order to illustrate the process of the pores being filled up with gold nanorods. Additional information is presented in Figure 4 for an area having a colloidal crystal structure.
Figure 3

SEM images of mesoporous silica films differing in GNR deposition density. (a) Low. (b) Medium. (c) High. Note that the densely packed GNR layer (right-hand image) is similar to the fractal-like GNR assembly on a silicon wafer (Additional file 1: Figure S2b). The white bars are 100 nm long.
Figure 4

SEM images of a GNR-OPC substrate at a low (left) and a high (right) resolution. The light regions near silica spheres (left image) correspond to the deposited GNRs that are clearly seen in the enlarged image (right).

SERS spectra recorded with GNR-Si and GNR-OPC substrates

To compare between the analytical enhancements [42] provided by the SERS structures formed, we used the rhodamine 6G (R6G) dye as a test analyte. In a typical SERS measurement protocol, 2.5 μL of an R6G solution in ethanol 80 μM in concentration was applied onto the surface of the substrate under study. The average surface area occupied by the dye droplet spread on the substrate was around 7 mm2. Measurements were mainly taken using radiation from a He-Ne laser (wavelength 632.8 nm, power in the beam spot approximately 5 mW). The laser beam spot diameter was around 20 μm, and the signal accumulation time came to 10 s (the signal was averaged over 10 measurements). With the test conditions remaining the same, SERS signals were measured from the R6G dye applied onto GNR-Si and GNR-OPC substrates differing in thickness of the opal-like film.

Figure 5 shows the SERS spectra of the 80 μM rhodamine 6G solution applied onto a GNR-Si (spectrum 1) and a GNR-OPC (spectrum 2) substrate excited at 632.8 nm. Evidently, the integral analytical enhancement [42] of the GNR-OPC substrate is from two to five times as high as that of the simple fractal-like GNR assembly on silicon. A common property of SERS measurements is that the integral enhancement depends on the particular Raman line selected for the purpose. The fundamental SERS enhancement [41, 42] is determined by several important factors that are difficult to take into account for mesoporous substrates. For a detailed discussion of this point, the readers are referred to the comprehensive analysis by Le Ru et al. [36].
Figure 5

SERS spectra of 80 μM rhodamine 6G solution applied onto GNR-Si (1) and thin GNR-OPC (2) substrates. Excited at 632.8 nm.

In Figure 6, we compare between the SERS spectra of the 80 μM rhodamine 6G solution applied onto ‘thin’ and ‘thick’ GNR-OPC substrates. This classification roughly corresponds to the number of the deposited silica layers, which is less than 10 in the former case and more than 10 in the latter. However, in both cases, the pores between silica spheres are densely covered by GNRs, but GNRs fail to cover the silica spheres completely. Surprisingly enough, the maximum SERS enhancement is observed with thin rather than thick substrates (cf. spectra 1 and 2 in Figure 6). It should be noted that the elevated tail in SERS spectrum 2 is due exactly to a thick silica film contribution. For thin substrates, the baseline is flat (similar to that for spectrum 1 in Figure 6). Moreover, for extremely thick substrates (about 1 to 2 mm thick), the SERS enhancement falls down, and we observe a monotonous contribution from the underlying silica opal (data not shown).
Figure 6

SERS spectra of 80 μM rhodamine 6G solution applied onto thin (1) and thick (2) GNR-OPC substrates. Excited at 632.8 nm.

Taking into account the analytical SERS enhancement coefficient of GNR-Si substrates [33] (2.5 × 103), we estimate the analytical enhancement coefficient of GNR-OPC substrates to be on the order of 104. We suppose that the additional SERS enhancement in the GNR-OPC substrates is due to several factors. First, such substrates have an increased specific surface and, accordingly, more Raman molecules capable of contributing to the measured spectra. Second, the highly inhomogeneous arrangement of GNRs in thin GNR-OPC films can produce more electromagnetic hot spots. Finally, additional contribution can come from multiple scattering within thick opal films, though this assumption needs to be specially studied.


In this work, we have studied a very simple technique to fabricate SERS substrates using wet chemical approaches only. Our approach is based on the use of a plasmonic powder of gold nanorods that are applied in a concentrated form onto an opal-like substrate of silicon nanospheres. As compared with the previously studied randomly oriented mono- and polylayers of gold nanorods on a plain silicon substrate, the structures obtained by us provide for a two- to fivefold enhancement of the SERS signal. The main mechanisms behind this effect are apparently the increase of the number of reporter molecules adsorbed on the mesoporous substrate and the increase of the number of electromagnetic hot spots. Of course, the analytical SERS enhancement coefficients attained with our structures are a few orders of magnitude lower than those for such structures as the silver-immobilized nanorod assembly [41, 42]. However, the principal advantage of our approach is its exceptional simplicity, for it requires no special procedures of vacuum deposition on colloidal crystals.

Several ways are possible to optimize the method described here. First, it seems advisable to replace gold nanorods with silver-coated nanorods [63] or to investigate other types of nonspherical gold or silver nanoparticles [64]. For example, Zhang et al. [65] fabricated SERS substrates based on large-scale metallic thin films assembled from size-selected silver nanoplates with tunable plasmonic properties. It was shown [65] that the aggregation of silver nanoplates with sharp corners produces hot spots between the corner gaps, thus leading to strong electromagnetic SERS enhancement. Unfortunately, unlike that of gold nanorods, the high-yield fabrication of monodisperse silver nanorods is not an easy task [66, 67], and a recent review of this issue has been published by Negri and Dluhy [68]. However, gold nanorods can be used as convenient templates for subsequent silver coating to ensure flexible tuning of the localized plasmon resonance from near-infrared (e.g., 900 nm) to visible (e.g., 580 nm) [69]. Our preliminary results show that the Au@Ag core-shell nanorod assemblies demonstrate better SERS performance as compared to aggregated gold nanorod films. Our full 3-D finite-difference time-domain simulations [70] confirm the existence of enhanced local electromagnetic hot spots that are more intensive in the case of random assemblies of silver-coated nanorods. Investigations along these lines are under way at our laboratories, and the results will be published elsewhere.




Atomic force microscopy


Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide


Gold nanorods


Gold nanorods on a mesoporous colloidal silica film


Gold nanorods on a silicon substrate


Mesoporous colloidal silica film


Rhodamine 6G


Surface-enhanced Raman (scattering) spectroscopy

T(S) EM: 

Transmission (scanning) electron microscopy.



This research was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Education of the Russian Federation (contract no. 8391 ‘Laser-informational technologies for fabrication of functional nanomaterials’ and megagrant 2012-220-03-044 ‘Engineering of multilevel 3-D structures of composite optoelectronic and biomedical materials’), the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (nos. 13-02-01075, 11-02-00128, 12-02-00379, and 12-02-31056), the Programs of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences ‘Basic Sciences for Medicine’ and ‘Basic Technologies for Nanostructures and Nanomaterials,’ and the Government of the Russian Federation (a grant to support scientific research projects implemented under the supervision of leading scientists at the Russian institutions of higher education). VAK was supported by a scholarship from the President of the Russian Federation and by a grant from OPTEC (Russia).

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Laser and Information Technologies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Plants and Microorganisms, Russian Academy of Sciences
Central Research Technological Institute “TECHNOMASH”
Saratov State University


  1. Aroca R: Surface-Enhanced Vibrational Spectroscopy. Chichester: Wiley; 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Le R: EC, Etchegoin PG: Principles of Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Jeanmarie DL, Van Duyne RP: Surface Raman spectroelectrochemistry, part 1: heterocyclic, aromatic, and aliphatic amines adsorbed on the anodized silver electrode. J Electroanal Chem 1977, 84: 120.Google Scholar
  4. Otto A: The ‘chemical’ (electronic) contribution to surface-enhanced Raman scattering. J Raman Spectrosc 2005, 36: 497–509. 10.1002/jrs.1355View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Khlebtsov NG: T-matrix method in plasmonics. J Quant Spectr Radiat Transfer 2013, 123: 184–217.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fleischmann M, Hendra PJ, McQuillan AJ: Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode. Chem Phys Lett 1974, 26: 163–166. 10.1016/0009-2614(74)85388-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Haynes CL, Yonzon CR, Zhang X, Van Duyne R: Surface-enhanced Raman sensors: early history and the development of sensors for quantitative biowarfare agent and glucose detection. J Raman Spectrosc 2005, 36: 471–484. 10.1002/jrs.1376View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Anker JN, Hall WP, Lyandres O, Shan NC, Zhao J, Van Duyne RP: Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nature Material 2008, 7: 442–453. 10.1038/nmat2162View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Schlücker S: Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Analytical, Biophysical and Life Science Applications. Chichester: Wiley; 2011.Google Scholar
  10. Kneipp K, Wang Y, Kneipp H, Perelman LT, Itzkan I, Dasari RR, Feld MS: Single molecule detection using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Phys Rev Lett 1997, 78: 1667–1670. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1667View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Nie S, Emory SR: Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Science 1997, 275: 1102–1106. 10.1126/science.275.5303.1102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lai SCS, Koper MTM: Ethanol electro-oxidation on platinum in alkaline media. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2009, 11: 10446–10456. 10.1039/b913170aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Khlebtsov NG, Dykman LA: Optical properties and biomedical applications of plasmonic nanoparticles. J Quant Spectr Radiat Transfer 2010, 111: 1–35. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.07.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ko H, Singamaneni S, Tsukruk VV: Nanostructured surfaces and assemblies as SERS media. Small 2008, 4: 1576–1599. 10.1002/smll.200800337View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Qian X-M, Nie SM: Single-molecule and single-nanoparticle SERS: from fundamental mechanisms to biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 2008, 37: 912–920. 10.1039/b708839fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Álvarez-Puebla RA, Liz-Marzán LM: Traps and cages for universal SERS detection. Chem Soc Rev 2012, 41: 43–51. 10.1039/c1cs15155jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin X-M, Cui Y, Xu Y-H, Ren B, Tian Z-Q: Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: substrate-related issues. Anal Bioanal Chem 2009, 394: 1729–1745. 10.1007/s00216-009-2761-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Fan MK, Andrade GFS, Brolo AG: A review on the fabrication of substrates for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy and their applications in analytical chemistry. Anal Chim Acta 2011, 693: 7–25. 10.1016/j.aca.2011.03.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Cialla D, März A, Böhme R, Theil F, Weber K, Schmitt M, Popp J: Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS): progress and trends. Anal Bioanal Chem 2012, 403: 27–54. 10.1007/s00216-011-5631-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tong L, Zhu T, Li Z: Approaching the electromagnetic mechanism of surface-enhanced Raman scattering: from self-assembled arrays to individual gold nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev 2011, 40: 1296–1304. 10.1039/c001054pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang Y, Yan B, Chen L: SERS tags: novel optical nanoprobes for bioanalysis. Chem Rev 2013, 113: 1391–1428. 10.1021/cr300120gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Haynes CL, Van Duyne RP: Nanosphere lithography: a versatile nanofabrication tool for studies of size-dependent nanoparticle optics. J Phys Chem B 2001, 105: 5599–5611. 10.1021/jp010657mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kosuda KM, Bingham JM, Wustholz KL, Van Duyne RP: Nanostructures and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Compr Nanosci Technol 2011, 3: 263–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Baia M, Baia L, Astilean S: Gold nanostructured films deposited on polystyrene colloidal crystal templates for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem Phys Lett 2005, 404: 3–8. 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.01.052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu L, Randjelovic I, Capek R, Gaponik N, Yang J, Zhang H, Eychmüller A: Controlled fabrication of gold-coated 3D ordered colloidal crystal films and their application in surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem Mater 2005, 17: 5731–5736. 10.1021/cm051473dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Mahajan S, Abdelsalam M, Suguwara Y, Cintra S, Russell A, Baumberg J, Bartlett P: Tuning plasmons on nano-structured substrates for NIR-SERS. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2007, 9: 104–109. 10.1039/b611803hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu X, Sun C-H, Linn NC, Jiang B, Jiang P: Wafer-scale surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates with highly reproducible enhancement. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 14804–14811. 10.1021/jp905065zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu X, Sun C-H, Linn NC, Jiang B, Jiang P: Templated fabrication of metal half-shells for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010, 12: 1379–1387. 10.1039/b919916kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Rao Y, Tao Q, An M, Rong C, Dong J, Dai Y, Qian W: Novel and simple route to fabricate 2D ordered gold nanobowl arrays based on 3D colloidal crystals. Langmuir 2011, 27: 13308–13313. 10.1021/la203158qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu G, Li Y, Duan G, Wang J, Liang C, Cai W: Tunable surface plasmon resonance and strong SERS performances of Au opening-nanoshell ordered arrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2012, 4: 1–5. 10.1021/am201455xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Nikoobakht B, El-Sayed MA: Surface-enhanced Raman scattering studies on aggregated gold nanorods. J Phys Chem A 2003, 107: 3372–3378. 10.1021/jp026770+View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuncicky DM, Prevo BG, Velev OD: Controlled assembly of SERS substrates templated by colloidal crystal films. J Mater Chem 2006, 16: 1207–1211. 10.1039/b512734cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Khlebtsov BN, Khanadeev VA, Panfilova EV, Minaeva SA, Tsvetkov MY, Bagratashvili VN, Khlebtsov NG: Surface-enhanced Raman scattering platforms on the basis of assembled gold nanorods. Nanotechnologies in Russia 2012, 7: 359–369. 10.1134/S1995078012040064View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Farcau C, Potara M, Leordean C, Boca S, Astilean S: Reliable plasmonic substrates for bioanalytical SERS applications easily prepared by convective assembly of gold nanocolloids. Analyst 2013, 138: 546–552. 10.1039/c2an36440aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Gabudean AM, Focsan M, Astilean S: Gold nanorods performing as dual-modal nanoprobes via metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF) and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 12240–12249. 10.1021/jp211954mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Le Ru EC, Blackie E, Meyer M, Etchegoin PG: Surface enhanced Raman scattering enhancement factors: a comprehensive study. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111: 13794–13803. 10.1021/jp0687908View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Blaber MG, Schatz GC: Extending SERS into the infrared with gold nanosphere dimers. Chem Commun 2011, 47: 3769–3771. 10.1039/c0cc05089jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Wustholz KL, Henry AI, McMahon JM, Freeman RG, Valley N, Piotti ME, Natan MJ, Schatz GC, Van Duyne RP: Structure-activity relationships in gold nanoparticle dimers and trimers for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132: 10903–10910. 10.1021/ja104174mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Fang Y, Seong NH, Dlott DD: Measurement of the distribution of site enhancements in surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Science 2008, 321: 388–392. 10.1126/science.1159499View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Natan MJ: Concluding remarks. Surface enhanced Raman scattering. Faraday Discuss 2006, 132: 321–328.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Greeneltch NG, Blaber MG, Schatz GC, Van Duyne RP: Plasmon-sampled surface-enhanced Raman excitation spectroscopy on silver immobilized nanorod assemblies and optimization for near infrared (λex = 1064 nm) studies. J Phys Chem C 2013, 117: 2554–2558. 10.1021/jp310846jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Greeneltch NG, Blaber MG, Henry A-I, Schatz GC, Van Duyne RP: Immobilized nanorod assemblies: fabrication and understanding of large area surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates. Anal Chem 2013, 85: 2297–2303. 10.1021/ac303269wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhurikhina VV, Brunkov PN, Melehin VG, Kaplas T, Svirko Y, Rutckaia VV, Lipovskii AA: Self-assembled silver nanoislands formed on glass surface via out-diffusion for multiple usages in SERS applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 676. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-676View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhu SQ, Zhang T, Guo XL, Wang QL, Liu X, Zhang XY: Gold nanoparticle thin films fabricated by electrophoretic deposition method for highly sensitive SERS application. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 613. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-613View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Dykman L, Khlebtsov N: Gold nanoparticles in biomedical applications: recent advances and perspectives. Chem Soc Rev 2012, 41: 2256–2282. 10.1039/c1cs15166eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhao P, Li N, Astruc D: State of the art in gold nanoparticle synthesis. Coord Chem Rev 2013, 257: 638–665. 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.09.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Tan KS, Cheong KY: Advances of Ag, Cu, and Ag-Cu alloy nanoparticles synthesized via chemical reduction route. J Nanopart Res 2013, 15: 1–29.Google Scholar
  48. Khlebtsov BN, Panfilova EV, Terentyuk GS, Maksimova IL, Ivanov AV, Khlebtsov NG: Plasmonic nanopowders for photothermal therapy of tumors. Langmuir 2012, 28: 8994–9002. 10.1021/la300022kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Khlebtsov BN, Khanadeev VA, Panfilova EV, Pylaev TE, Bibikova OA, Staroverov SA, Bogatyrev VA, Dykman LA, Khlebtsov NG: New types of nanomaterials: powders of gold nanospheres, nanorods, nanostars, and gold–silver nanocages. Nanotechnologies in Russia 2013, 8: 209–219. 10.1134/S1995078013020092View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsvetkov MY, Khlebtsov BN, Panfilova EV, Bafratashvili VN, Khlebtsov NG: Gold nanorods as a promising technological platform for SERS-analytics. Russian Chem J 2012, 56: 83–90. (in Russian) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  51. Stockman MI: Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future. Opt Express 2011, 19: 22029–22106. 10.1364/OE.19.022029View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Nikoobakht B, El-Sayed MA: Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method. Chem Mater 2003, 15: 1957–1962. 10.1021/cm020732lView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Khlebtsov B, Khanadeev V, Khlebtsov N: A new T-matrix solvable model for nanorods: TEM-based ensemble simulations supported by experiments. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 6317–6323.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E: Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Interface Sci 1968, 26: 62–69. 10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Tsvetkov MY, Bagratashvili VN, Panchenko VY, Rybaltovskii AO, Samoylovich MI, Timofeev MA: Plasmon resonances of silver nanoparticles in silica based mesostructured films. Nanotechnologies in Russia 2011, 6: 619–624. 10.1134/S1995078011050156View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Khlebtsov BN, Khanadeev VA, Khlebtsov NG: Observation of extra-high depolarized light scattering spectra from gold nanorods. J Phys Chem C 2008, 112: 12760–12768. 10.1021/jp802874xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Ratto F, Matteini P, Rossi F, Pini R: Size and shape control in the overgrowth of gold nanorods. J Nanopart Res 2010, 12: 2029–2036. 10.1007/s11051-009-9712-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Khlebtsov BN, Khanadeev VA, Khlebtsov NG: Determination of the size, concentration, and refractive index of silica nanoparticles from turbidity spectra. Langmuir 2008, 277: 107–110.Google Scholar
  59. Busch K, John S: Photonic band gap formation in certain self-organizing systems. Phys Rev E 1998, 58: 3896–3908.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Lopez C: Materials aspects of photonic crystals. Adv Mater 2003, 15: 1679–1704. 10.1002/adma.200300386View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Bertone JF, Jiang P, Hwang KS, Mittleman DM, Colvin VL: Thickness dependence of the optical properties of ordered silica-air and air-polymer photonic crystals. Phys Rev Lett 1999, 83: 300–303. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.300View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Jain PK, El-Sayed MA: Plasmonic coupling in noble metal nanostructures. Chem Phys Lett 2010, 487: 153–164. 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.01.062View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Zong S, Wang Z, Yang J, Wang C, Xu S, Cui Y: A SERS and fluorescence dual mode cancer cell targeting probe based on silica coated Au@Ag core–shell nanorods. Talanta 2012, 97: 368–375.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang C, Chen Y, Ma Z, Wang T, Su Z: Generalized fabrication of surfactant-stabilized anisotropic metal nanoparticles to amino-functionalized surfaces: application to surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Nanosci Nanotechno 2008, 8: 5887–5895. 10.1166/jnn.2008.222View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang X-Y, Hu A, Zhang T, Lei W, Xue X-J, Zhou Y, Duley WW: Self-assembly of large-scale and ultrathin silver nanoplate films with tunable plasmon resonance properties. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 9082–9092. 10.1021/nn203336mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Pietrobon B, McEachran M, Kitaev V: Synthesis of size-controlled faceted pentagonal silver nanorods with tunable plasmonic properties and self-assembly of these nanorods. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 21–26. 10.1021/nn800591yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Mahmoud MA, El-Sayed MA: Different plasmon sensing behavior of silver and gold nanorods. J Phys Chem Lett 2013, 4: 1541–1545. 10.1021/jz4005015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Negri P, Dluhy RA: Ag nanorod based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy applied to bioanalytical sensing. J Biophotonics 2013, 6: 20–35. 10.1002/jbio.201200133View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Khlebtsov B, Khanadeev V, Khlebtsov N: Tunable depolarized light scattering from gold and gold/silver nanorods. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010, 12: 3210–3218. 10.1039/b925102bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Taflove A: Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. Boston: Artech House; 1995.Google Scholar


© Tsvetkov et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.