Open Access

Improving Si solar cell performance using Mn:ZnSe quantum dot-doped PLMA thin film

Nanoscale Research Letters20138:291

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-291

Received: 8 May 2013

Accepted: 5 June 2013

Published: 20 June 2013


Poly(lauryl methacrylate) (PLMA) thin film doped with Mn:ZnSe quantum dots (QDs) was spin-deposited on the front surface of Si solar cell for enhancing the solar cell efficiency via photoluminescence (PL) conversion. Significant solar cell efficiency enhancements (approximately 5% to 10%) under all-solar-spectrum (AM0) condition were observed after QD-doped PLMA coatings. Furthermore, the real contribution of the PL conversion was precisely assessed by investigating the photovoltaic responses of the QD-doped PLMA to monochromatic and AM0 light sources as functions of QD concentration, combined with reflectance and external quantum efficiency measurements. At a QD concentration of 1.6 mg/ml for example, among the efficiency enhancement of 5.96%, about 1.04% was due to the PL conversion, and the rest came from antireflection. Our work indicates that for the practical use of PL conversion in solar cell performance improvement, cautions are to be taken, as the achieved efficiency enhancement might not be wholly due to the PL conversion.


Si solar cell Quantum dots Photoluminescence conversion Antireflectin 78.55.-m 84.60.Jt


Commercial solar cells employ only a small portion of the solar spectrum for photoelectric conversion, with the available wavelengths covering the visible to near-infrared (NIR) regimes [1]. To fully use the solar emission energy, various light frequency-conversion approaches have been proposed [217], which convert IR or ultraviolet (UV) lights into visible ones, the so called up- and down-conversions, respectively. So far, the photoluminescence (PL) conversion, as a type of down-conversion, seems more potentially available in solar cell efficiency enhancement. However, its practical use is actually uncertain, as other factors such as antireflection (AR) might also contribute to the efficiency enhancement in addition to the PL conversion, making the assessment of real contribution from PL conversion doubtful [6, 914]. Although in our recent work [10], we have noticed this problem and tried to single out the contribution of PL conversion, systematic studies and convincing experimental facts are still lacking. This work aims to solve the puzzling problem by offering a combined approach and evaluating how important on earth the PL conversion could be in improving solar cell efficiency. We selected a material with high PL conversion efficiency (> 40%), i.e., Mn-doped ZnSe quantum dots (Mn:ZnSe QDs). The QDs were dispersed within an organic solution, poly(lauryl methacrylate) (PLMA), which was then spin-coated on the front surface of commercial Si solar cell. The photovoltaic (PV) responses to monochromatic and AM0 light sources were investigated, combined with reflectance and external quantum efficiency (EQE) measurements. With these, the real contribution from PL conversion to the solar cell efficiency enhancement was unambiguously identified and assessed.


Mn:ZnSe QDs immersed within toluene were purchased from ZKWY Biotech Incorporation Ltd., Beijing, China. Figure 1 shows their absorption and PL spectra, which reveal the feature of PL conversion from UV/blue to orange/red regimes. The PL efficiency is > 40%. Figure 2 gives a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the QDs dispersed on a Cu grid, acquired with a FEI spectrometer (G2F20, Tecnai, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The average QD size is 4.8 ± 0.2 nm. Crystalline Si solar cells (20 × 14 mm2 in size) without AR treatment were offered by the Shanghai Institute of Space Power Supply, Shanghai, China. The QD suspension was firstly mixed within PLMA (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., St. Louis, MO, USA) and then deposited onto the surface of solar cell with a spin coater. QD concentration (CQD) was determined by adjusting the proportions of QD suspension and PLMA. The thickness of QD-doped PLMA was around 150 nm as measured using a stylus-profiler (ET3000, Kosaka Laboratory Ltd., Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan). Reflectance spectra of Si coated with QD-doped PLMA were obtained with an UV–vis-NIR spectrophotometer (UV-3101PC, Shimadzu Corporation, Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan). PL spectra were recorded on a fluorescence spectrometer (F4500, Hitachi High-Tech, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan). Monochromatic lights from one He-Cd laser and other three semiconductor lasers with λ = 325, 473, 650, and 980 nm, respectively, were used to investigate the PV responses of short-circuit current (ISC). Also, a simulated all-solar-spectrum (AM0) PV response was measured on a solar simulator (94023A, Newport Corporation, CA, USA) to acquire the PV parameters of photoelectric conversion efficiency (η), fill factor (FF), ISC, and open-circuit voltage (UOC). The EQE measurement of solar cell was performed on a QE/IPCE system of Oriel/Newport.
Figure 1

Absorption and PL emission spectra of Mn:ZnSe QDs.
Figure 2

TEM image of the Mn:ZnSe QD distribution.

Results and discussion

Figure 3a shows short-circuit current enhancements (ΔI/I’s) under illuminations of four monochromatic light sources (λ = 325, 473, 650, and 980 nm) as functions of CQD. ΔI/I is defined as (I1Ibare)/Ibare, where Ibare and I1 are ISC’s for bare Si solar cell and Si solar cell coated with QD-doped PLMA, respectively. Figure 3b gives the corresponding trends of reflectance for the four wavelengths. It is seen that except for that of UV (λ = 325 nm), the ΔI/I trends of other three wavelengths can be well explained in terms of their reflectance ones. For instance, for the blue (λ = 473 nm) response, with the increasing CQD, the reflectance increases steadily, and after reaching the maximum around 2.2 mg/ml, it starts to decrease. Due to this evolution of reflectance, ΔI/I decreases steadily at first, and at around 2.2 mg/ml, it starts to increase. As compared to the blue, red (λ = 650 nm), and NIR (λ = 980 nm) ones, the UV response looks like ‘abnormal’; it does not decrease monotonously in terms of the trend of reflectance but shows a raised structure peaking around 1.6 mg/ml. The appearance of such a raised structure should be due to the PL conversion under UV illumination. Since the absorption edge of QDs as indicated in Figure 1 is approximately 450 nm, it is thus concluded that the PL conversion takes place at wavelengths less than approximately 450 nm. Since the current increase trend correlates monotonously with that of reflectance when the PL conversion does not happen as the cases of λ = 473, 650, and 980 nm, for the case of UV in Figure 3a, the contribution of pure AR to ΔI/I could then be represented by a monotonously changing curve as indicated by the dashed line, which was drawn through extrapolating the data at CQD < approximately 0.8 mg/ml and C QD > approximately 2.8 mg/ml, where the PL conversion contribution was little. Therefore, at CQD = 1.6 mg/ml, ΔI/I reads 35.07%, among which, approximately 9.66% is from the effect of PL conversion as calculated, and the rest approximately 25.41% due to AR. In the following, we will focus on the cases of CQD = 0 and 1.6 mg/ml only and assess the contribution of PL conversion to Si solar cell efficiency enhancement under two AM0 conditions.
Figure 3

Short-circuit current enhancements (a) and reflectance coefficients (b) vs QD concentration ( C QD ) for four monochromatic light sources.

Figure 4 gives the measured EQE curves for Si solar cells with CQD = 0 and 1.6 mg/ml (right ordinate), together with the emission spectra of a standard AM0 [18] (left ordinate). A solar cell efficiency enhancement is defined as Δη/η0 = 1− η0)/η0, where η0 and η1 are photoelectric conversion efficiencies of Si solar cell coated with QD-doped PLMA with CQD = 0 and CQD ≠ 0, respectively. It should be noted here that unlike ΔI/I, which is with respect to bare Si solar cell, Δη/η0 is with respect to Si solar cell coated with pure PLMA (CQD = 0). In Table 1, the measured and calculated PV parameters for different solar cells are listed. Based on Figure 4, Δη/η0 could be calculated as follows. The AM0 intensity times EQE yields the modified EQE curve. An example is illustrated in Figure 4 by the dotted curve for AM0 × EQE at CQD = 0. The modified EQE curve gives the efficiency response for each wavelength in AM0 spectrum. The summation of all the responses, i.e., the area under the modified EQE curve may represent the solar cell efficiency. Δη/η0 can thus be calculated as the area difference between CQD = 1.6 mg/ml and 0, divided by the area for CQD = 0. The calculated Δη/η0 was 5.96%, which is close to the measured value. For λ < approximately 450 nm, the efficiency enhancement could now be regarded as wholly from the contribution of PL conversion, since the reflectance coefficients at CQD = 0 and 1.6 mg/ml are nearly the same as shown in Figure 3b. Hence, the PL contribution was calculated as the area difference between CQD = 1.6 mg/ml and 0 for λ < approximately 450 nm only, divided by the whole area for CQD = 0. It was 1.04%. Therefore, the rest 5.96% − 1.04% = 4.92% was due to AR. In Figure 5, I-V curves for bare Si solar cell and Si solar cell coated with QD-doped PLMA (CQD = 0 and 1.6 mg/ml) are depicted. UOC and FF change slightly; only the ISC varies steadily, leading to a change in η. In Table 1, Δη/η0 for CQD = 3.0 mg/ml is as high as 9.97%, which is the highest efficiency enhancement achieved in this work. However, from Figure 3a, it is certain that the PL contribution to Δη/η0 at CQD = 3.0 mg/ml is very little. The AR effect contributes dominantly, which could be attributed to the modification of refractive index gradient [19]. Since many other efficient AR approaches have been developed [1922], the effect of AR will not be further discussed here.
Figure 4

EQE curves and emission spectrum of the standard AM0. EQE curves for Si solar cells coated with QD-doped PLMA with CQD = 0 and 1.6 mg/ml (right ordinate) and the power-density-normalized standard AM0 spectrum (left ordinate). The dotted curve is the modified EQE curve for CQD = 0 (right ordinate) under the AM0 condition.
Figure 5

I-V curves. For bare Si solar cell and Si solar cells coated with QD-doped PLMA at CQD = 0 and 1.6 mg/ml.

Table 1

PV parameters for Si solar cells after treatments




FF (%)


Δ η/η0(%)

Δ η/η0(%) (calculated)

Bare cell







CQD = 0







CQD = 1.6 mg/ml







CQD = 3.0 mg/ml







In this work, AM0 solar simulator rather than the more conventional AM1.5 one has been used. This is because the effect of PL conversion on the performance improvement of solar cell is more applicable in the environment with higher UV proportions. The UV proportion in the high altitude or outer space environment, which the AM0 condition mimics, is generally two to three times that in the normal AM1.5 one. On the other hand, from Figure 4, it is seen that the solar cell has high EQE in a broad wavelength range of approximately 450 to 1,000 nm; therefore, although for each wavelength, the corresponding reflectance changes with the changing film thickness due to the light interference, the overall efficiency enhancement is not sensitive to the film thickness, as what we found in our experiments for the film thickness in the range of 100 to 300 nm. However, it should be pointed out that to optimize the effect of PL conversion, the film thickness could be a concern in the work that follows; meanwhile, the side edges of PLMA film would be coated with SiO2 by a simple mask method so as to prevent visible lights due to the PL conversion escaping from the side areas and let them be absorbed by the solar cell underneath.


In this work, PLMA thin film doped with Mn:ZnSe QDs was spin-deposited on the front surface of Si solar cell in order to improve the solar cell efficiency via PL conversion. Significant efficiency enhancements (approximately 5% to 10%) were achieved indeed under AM0 conditions. Both the effects of AR and PL conversion contributed to the solar cell efficiency enhancements but that of PL took a small portion. A precise assessment of PL contribution to the efficiency enhancement was made by investigating the PV responses of Si solar cells coated with QD-doped PLMA to monochromatic and AM0 light sources as functions of QD concentration, combined with reflectance and EQE measurements. Our work shows that the real PL contribution might not be all that as reflected by the apparent efficiency enhancement, and cautions are to be taken when applying the PL conversion in this aspect. On the other hand, it indicates again that for practical use of PL conversion, high altitude or/and outer space environments are preferred where the UV proportion is high, and continuing to search for high PL efficiency materials and design efficient optical-coupling structures is still necessary.



This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) under the grant number 2012CB934303 and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the grant numbers 61275178, 10974034, and 60878044. Experimental assistances from Professors J. D. Wu, N. Xu, and J. Shen are gratefully acknowledged.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Optical Science and Engineering, and Shanghai Ultra-Precision Optical Manufacturing Engineering Center, Fudan University
Materials Physics, Royal Institute of Technology KTH


  1. Goetzberger A, Hebling C, Schock HW: Photovoltaic materials, history, status and outlook. Mater Sci Eng R-Rep 2003, 40: 1. 10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00092-XView Article
  2. Strumpel C, McCann C, Beaucarne G, Arkhipov V, Slaoui A, Svrcek V, del Canizo C, Tobias I: Modifying the solar spectrum to enhance silicon solar cell efficiency - an overview of available materials. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 2007, 91: 238. 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.09.003View Article
  3. Trupke T, Green MA, Wurfel P: Improving solar cell efficiencies by down-conversion of high-energy photons. J Appl Phys 2002, 92: 1668. 10.1063/1.1492021View Article
  4. Trupke T, Green MA, Wurfel P: Improving solar cell efficiencies by up-conversion of sub-band-gap light. J Appl Phys 2002, 92: 4117. 10.1063/1.1505677View Article
  5. Van Sark WGJHM, de Wild J, Rath JK, Meijerink A, Schropp REI: Upconversion in solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 81. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-81View Article
  6. Svrcek V, Slaoui A, Muller JC: Silicon nanocrystals as light converter for solar cells. Thin Solid Films 2004, 451: 384.View Article
  7. Stupca M, Alsalhi M, Al Saud T, Almuhanna A, Nayfeh MH: Enhancement of polycrystalline silicon solar cells using ultrathin films of silicon nanoparticle. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 063107. 10.1063/1.2766958View Article
  8. Chen HC, Lin CC, Han HW, Tsai YL, Chang CH, Wang HW, Tsai MA, Kuo HC, Yu PC: Enhanced efficiency for c-Si solar cell with nanopillar array via quantum dots layers. Opt Express 2011, 19: A1141. 10.1364/OE.19.0A1141View Article
  9. Chen HC, Lin CC, Han HV, Chen KJ, Tsai YL, Chang YA, Shih MH, Kuo HC, Yu PC: Enhancement of power conversion efficiency in GaAs solar cells with dual-layer quantum dots using flexible PDMS film. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 2012, 104: 92.View Article
  10. Zhang M, Ren Y, Cheng DC, Lu M: Solar cell performance improvement via photoluminescence conversion of Si nanoparticles. Chin Opt Lett 2012, 10: 063101. 10.3788/COL201210.063101View Article
  11. Le Donne A, Acciarri M, Narducci D, Marchionna S, Binetti S: Encapsulating Eu3+ complex doped layers to improve Si-based solar cell efficiency. Prog Photovoltaics 2009, 17: 519. 10.1002/pip.902View Article
  12. Mutlugun E, Soganci IM, Demir HV: Photovoltaic nanocrystal scintillators hybridized on Si solar cells for enhanced conversion efficiency in UV. Opt Express 2008, 16: 3537. 10.1364/OE.16.003537View Article
  13. van Sark WGJHM, Meijerink A, Schropp REI, van Roosmalen JAM, Lysen EH: Modeling improvement of spectral response of solar cells by deployment of spectral converters containing semiconductor nanocrystals. Semiconductors 2004, 38: 962. 10.1134/1.1787120View Article
  14. Pi XD, Li Q, Li DS, Yang DR: Spin-coating silicon-quantum-dot ink to improve solar cell efficiency. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 2011, 95: 2941. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.06.010View Article
  15. Abrams ZR, Niv A, Zhang X: Solar energy enhancement using down-converting particles: a rigorous approach. J Appl Phys 2011, 109: 114905. 10.1063/1.3592297View Article
  16. Sgrignuoli F, Paternoster G, Marconi A, Ingenhoven P, Anopchenko A, Pucker G, Pavesi L: Modeling of silicon nanocrystals based down-shifter for enhanced silicon solar cell performance. J Appl Phys 2012, 111: 034303. 10.1063/1.3679140View Article
  17. Johnson CM, Conibeer GJ: Limiting efficiency of generalized realistic c-Si solar cells coupled to ideal up-converters. J Appl Phys 2012, 112: 103108. 10.1063/1.4766386View Article
  18. National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Solar Radiation Research. . Accessed 28 December 2012 . Accessed 28 December 2012
  19. Zhou J, Hildebrandt M, Lu M: Self-organized antireflecting nano-cone arrays on Si (100) induced by ion bombardment. J Appl Phys 2011, 109: 053513. 10.1063/1.3560539View Article
  20. Tsai FJ, Wang JY, Huang JJ, Kiang YW, Yang CC: Absorption enhancement of an amorphous Si solar cell through surface plasmon-induced scattering with metal nanoparticles. Opt Express 2010, 18: A207. 10.1364/OE.18.00A207View Article
  21. Marchionna S, Meinardi F, Acciarri A, Binetti S, Papagni A, Pizzini S, Malatesta V, Tubino R: Photovoltaic quantum efficiency enhancement by light harvesting of organo-lanthanide complexes. J Lumin 2006, 118: 325. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2005.09.010View Article
  22. Huang CY, Wang DY, Wang CH, Chen YT, Wang YT, Jiang YT, Yang YJ, Chen CC, Chen YF: Efficient light harvesting by photon downconversion and light trapping in hybrid ZnS nanoparticles/Si nanotips solar cells. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 5849. 10.1021/nn101817sView Article


© Cheng et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.