Displacing, squeezing, and time evolution of quantum states for nanoelectronic circuits
 Jeong Ryeol Choi^{1}Email author,
 Byeong Jae Choi^{2} and
 Hyun Deok Kim^{3}
DOI: 10.1186/1556276X830
© Choi et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 16 July 2012
Accepted: 4 December 2012
Published: 15 January 2013
Abstract
The time behavior of DSN (displaced squeezed number state) for a twodimensional electronic circuit composed of nanoscale elements is investigated using unitary transformation approach. The original Hamiltonian of the system is somewhat complicated. However, through unitary transformation, the Hamiltonian became very simple enough that we can easily treat it. By executing inverse transformation for the wave function obtained in the transformed system, we derived the exact wave function associated to the DSN in the original system. The time evolution of the DSN is described in detail, and its corresponding probability density is illustrated. We confirmed that the probability density oscillates with time like that of a classical state. There are two factors that drive the probability density to oscillate: One is the initial amplitude of complementary functions, and the other is the external power source. The oscillation associated with the initial amplitude gradually disappears with time due to the dissipation raised by resistances of the system. These analyses exactly coincide with those obtained from classical state. The characteristics of quantum fluctuations and uncertainty relations for charges and currents are also addressed.
Keywords
Displaced squeezed number states Electronic circuits Nanoscale physics Unitary transformation Fluctuations of charges and currentsBackground
The technical range of nanoscale is 1 to 999 nm, but people often refer to nanosize when an element is smaller than about 100 nm, where quantum effects are dominant instead of classical ones. Nanophysics and nanoelectronics have been rapidly developed thanks to the advancement of relevant technologies such as crystal growth and lithography, which facilitate sophisticated experiments for nanosystems [1, 2]. A recent conspicuous trend in the community of electronic device is that the integrated circuits and components are miniaturized towards atomicscale dimensions [2]. We can confirm from many experiments and theories associated with nanoscale elements that the quantum effects become prominent when the transport dimension reaches a critical value which is the Fermi wavelength, while at the same situation, the classical theory for the motion of charges and currents is invalid. Not only quantum dot and quantum wire but also the quantum characteristics of electronic circuits involving nanoscale elements are important as a supporting theory for nanometer electronic technology and quantum information technology. For this reason, quantum effects in electronic circuits with nanoscale elements have been widely studied in recent years.
The simple quantum model of a lossless inductorcapacitor (LC) circuit have been suggested firstly by Louisell [3]. Zhang et al. investigated the quantum properties of twodimensional electronic circuits which have no power source [4]. The quantum behavior of charges and currents for an LC circuit [5] and a resistorinductorcapacitor (RLC) linear circuit [3] driven by a power source have been studied by several researchers. If a circuit contains resistance, the electronic energy of the system dissipates with time. In this case, the system is described by a timedependent Hamiltonian. Another example of the systems described by timedependent Hamiltonian is electronic circuits driven by timevarying power sources. The quantum problem of timedependent Hamiltonian systems attracted great concern in the community of theoretical physics and chemistry for several decades [4, 6, 7].
The study of electronic characteristics of charge carriers in nanoelectronic circuits is basically pertained to a physical problem. There are plentiful reports associated with the physical properties of miniaturized twoloop (or twodimensional) circuits [8–12] and more high multiloop circuits [13–16] including their diverse variants. Various applications which use twoloop circuits include a switchlevel resistorcapacitor (RC) model of an ntransistor (see Figure 3 of [8]), a design of a prototype of currentmode leapfrog ladder filters (Sect. 3 of [9]), and a portHamiltonian system [10], whereas higher loop circuits can be used as a transmission line model for multiwall carbon nanotube [13] and a filter circuit for electronic signals (Sect. 5 of [15]).
In this paper, we derive quantum solutions of a twodimensional circuit coupled via RL and investigate its displaced squeezed number state (DSN) [17]. We suppose that the system is composed of nanoscale elements and driven by a timevarying power source. The unitary transformation method which is very useful when treating timedependent Hamiltonian systems in cases like this will be used. We can obtain the wave functions of DSN by first applying the squeezing operator in those of the number state and then applying the unitary displacement operator. Under displaced quantum states of circuit electrodynamics, conducting charges (or currents) exhibit collective classicallike oscillation. The fluctuations and uncertainty relations for charges and currents will be evaluated in the DSN without approximation.
Displaced squeezed number states, which are the main topic in this work, belong to nonclassical states that have been objects of many investigations. The statistical properties of these states exhibit several pure quantum effects which have no classical analogues, including the interference in the phase space [18], the revival/collapse phenomenon [19], and subPoissonian statistics [20]. The position representation of these states with overall phases is derived by Moller et al. for the simple harmonic oscillator by employing geometric operations in phase space [17]. The effects of quantum interference between two distinct DSNs prepared to be out of phase with respect to each other are investigated by Faisal et. al., discussing various nonclassical properties in connection with quantum number distribution, purity, quadrature squeezing, Wfunction, etc. [21].
Methods and results
Simplification via unitary transformation
where q_{ j } (j=1,2; hereafter, this convention will be used for all j) are charges stored in the capacitances C_{ j }, respectively, and $\mathcal{E}\left(t\right)$ is an arbitrary timevarying voltage source connected in loop 1. If we consider not only the existence of $\mathcal{E}\left(t\right)$ but also the mixed appearance of q_{1} and q_{2} in these two equations, it may be not an easy task to treat the system directly. If the scale of resistances are sufficiently large, the system is described by an overdamped harmonic oscillator, whereas the system becomes an underdamped harmonic oscillator in the case of small resistances. In this paper, we consider only the underdamped case.
The finally transformed Hamiltonian, Equation 22, is very simple and no longer involves linear terms that contain $\mathcal{E}\left(t\right)$. If we neglect ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathit{\text{jp}}}\left(t\right)$, this is exactly the same as that of the twodimensional simple harmonic oscillator of frequencies ω_{ j }. We will use this formula in order to develop DSN, which is a typical nonclassical quantum state.
where ${\psi}_{{n}_{j}}^{B}({q}_{j},t)$ represent number state wave functions for each component of the decoupled systems described by ${\mathit{\u0124}}_{\mathit{\text{Bj}}}$.
This formula of wave functions will be used in the next section in order to derive the DSN of the system.
Displaced squeezed number state
The DSNs are defined by first squeezing the number states and then displacing them. Like squeezed states, DSNs exhibit nonclassical properties of the quantum field in which the fluctuation of a certain observable can be less than that in the vacuum state. This state is a generalized quantum state for dynamical systems and, in fact, equivalent to excited twophoton coherent states in quantum optics. If we consider that DSNs generalize and combine the features of wellknown important states such as displaced number states (DNs) [22], squeezed number states [23], and twophoton coherent states (nonexcited) [24], the study of DSNs may be very interesting. Different aspects of these states, including quantal statistics, entropy, entanglement, and position space representation with the correct overall phase, have been investigated in [17, 23, 25].
The transformed system reduces to a twodimensional undriven simple harmonic oscillator in the limit $\mathcal{E}\left(t\right)=0$. Our result in Equation 44 is exact, and in this limit, we can easily confirm that some errors in Equation 45 in [30] are corrected (see Appendix Appendix 2).
This is the full expression of the time evolution of wave functions for the DSN. If we let r→0, the squeezing effects disappear, and consequently, the system becomes DN. Of course the above equation reduces, in this limit, to that of the DN.
You can see the effects of squeezing from Figure 3. The probability densities in the DSN are more significantly distorted than those of the DN. We can see from Figure 3b,c that the time behavior of probability densities is highly affected by external power source. If there is no power source in the circuit, the displacement of charge, specified with an initial condition, may gradually disappear according to its dissipation induced by resistances in the circuit. This is the same as that interpreted from the DN and exactly coincides with classical analysis of the system.
While various means and technologies to generate squeezed and/or displaced light are developed in the context of quantum optics after the seminal work of Slusher et al. [31] for observing squeezed light in the mid 1980s, (displaced) squeezed number state with sufficient degree of squeezing for charges and currents in a circuit quantum electrodynamics is first realized not long ago by Marthaler et al. [32] as far as we know. The circuit they designed not only undergoes sufficiently low dissipation but its potential energy also contains a positive quartic term that leads to achieving strong squeezing. Another method to squeeze quantum states of mechanical oscillation of charge carriers in a circuit is to use the technique of backaction evasion [33, 34] that is originally devised in order to measure one of two arbitrary conjugate quadratures with high precision beyond the standard quantum limit.
Though it is out of the scope of this work, the superpositions of any two DSNs may also be interesting topics to study, thanks to their nonclassical features that have no classical analogues. The quantum properties such as quadrature squeezing, quantum number distribution, purity, and the Mandel Q parameter for the superposition of two DSNs out of phase with respect to each other are studied in the literatures (see, for example, [35]).
Quantum fluctuations
Now let us see the quantum fluctuations and uncertainty relations for charges and currents in the DSN for the original system. It is well known that quantum energy and any physical observables are temporarily changed due to their quantum fluctuations. The theoretical study for the origin and background physics of quantum fluctuations have been performed in [36] by introducing stochastic and microcanonical quantizations.
As we have seen before, the expectation values associated to charges and currents are represented in terms of complementary functions, q_{ j c }(t) and p_{ j c }(t), and particular solutions q_{ j p }(t) and p_{ j p }(t). The amplitude of complementary functions is determined from the strength of displacements, whereas the particular solutions are determined by the power source $\mathcal{E}\left(t\right)$ (see Equations 19 and 20). However, all of the fluctuations do not involve such solutions. This means that the displacement and the electric power source do not affect to the fluctuations of charges and currents.
Conclusions
In summary, the time evolution of the DSN for the twodimensional electronic circuit composed of nanoscale elements and driven by a power source is investigated using unitary transformation method. Two steps of the unitary transformation are executed: We removed the cross term involving ${\widehat{p}}_{1}{\widehat{p}}_{2}$ in the original Hamiltonian from the first step, and the linear terms represented in terms of ${\widehat{q}}_{j}\mathcal{E}\left(t\right)$ in the firstly transformed Hamiltonian are eliminated by second unitary transformation.
We can see from Equation 6 that the original Hamiltonian is timedependent. When treating a timedependent Hamiltonian system dynamically, one usually employs classical solutions of the equation of motion for a given system (or for a system similar to a given system) [6, 7]. We also introduced such classical solutions in Equations 19 to 20 and in Equations 47 to 48. Among them, particular solutions q_{ j p } and p_{ j p } are important in developing quantum theory of the system involving external power source since they are crucial factors that lead the transformed Hamiltonian to be simple so that we can easily treat it.
Since the transformed system is just the same as the one that consists of two independent simple harmonic oscillators, provided that we can neglect the trivial terms ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathit{\text{jp}}}\left(t\right)$ in the transformed Hamiltonian, we easily identified the complete quantum solutions in the DSN in the transformed system. We also obtained the wave functions of the DSN in the original system via the technique of inverse transformation, as shown in Equation 50. If we regard the fact that the probability does not reflect the phase of a wave function, the overall phase of these states is relatively unimportant for many cases. However, in some applications such as the computation of expectation values using generating or characteristic functions given in [17], the exact knowledge of overall phase is crucial. For r_{1}=r_{2}=0, the wave function in the DSN exactly reduces to that of the DN.
We analyzed the probability densities in the DN and in the DSN from Figures 2 and 3, respectively, with the choice of sinusoidal signal source. The probability densities in the DN given in Figure 2b,c,d oscillate with time. Moreover, their time behaviors are more or less distorted. The probability density, however, does not oscillate when there are no displacement and no signal of power source (see Figure 2a). The probability densities in the DSN are distorted much more significantly than those of the DN.
The time behavior of probability densities of quantum states, both the DN and the DSN, is highly affected by external driving power source. When there is no external power source($\mathcal{E}\left(t\right)$=0), the displacement of charges, specified with a certain initial condition, gradually disappears as time goes by like a classical state.
The fluctuations and uncertainty products of charges and currents are derived in the DSN, and it is shown that their value is independent of the size of the particular solutions q_{ j p }(t) and p_{ j p }(t). From this, together with the fact that q_{ j p }(t) and p_{ j p }(t) are determined by the characteristics of $\mathcal{E}\left(t\right)$, it is clear that the electric power source does not affect on the fluctuation of canonical variables. If we ignore the time dependence of F_{ j }(t) and ${\mathcal{F}}_{j}\left(t\right)$, ${\left(\Delta {\widehat{q}}_{j}\right)}_{s}$ decrease exponentially with time, whereas ${\left(\Delta {\widehat{p}}_{j}\right)}_{s}$ increase exponentially.
From Equations 64 and 65, we can see that the time behavior of q_{ j } is determined by two factors: One is displacement and the other is the signal of power source. For better understanding of this, recall that the amplitude of complementary functions gives displacement of the system, and the particular solutions are closely related to external driving force (i.e., in this case, the power source).
In this paper, we did not consider thermal effects for the system. The thermal effects, as well as dissipation, may be worth to be considered in the studies of quantum fluctuations of electronic circuits with nanosize elements because the practical circuits are always working in thermal states with the presence of damping. It may therefore be a good theme to investigate DSNs with thermalization as a next task, and we plan to investigate it in the near future.
Appendix 1
The eighth formula of 7.374 in [29]
Appendix 2
Correction of Equation 45 of [30]
Appendix 3
Expectation value of ${\widehat{q}}_{j}^{2}$ and ${\widehat{p}}_{j}^{2}$
Appendix 4
Classical currents
Abbreviations
 DN:

displaced number state.
Declarations
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Sohn LL, Kouwenhoven LP, Schön G: Mesoscopic Electron Transport. Kluwer: Dordrecht; 1997.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Ando T, Arakawa Y, Furuya K, Komiyama S, Nakashima H: Mesoscopic Physics and Electronics. Springer: Berlin; 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Louisell WH: Quantum Statistical Properties of Radiation. New York: Wiley; 1973.Google Scholar
 Zhang S, Choi JR, Um CI, Yeon KH: Quantum uncertainties of mesoscopic inductanceresistance coupled circuit. J Korean Phys Soc 2002, 40: 325–329.Google Scholar
 Baseia B, De Brito AL: Quantum noise reduction in an electrical circuit having a time dependent parameter. Physica A 1993, 197: 364–370. 10.1016/03784371(93)90590ZView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Choi JR: Exact solution of a quantized LC circuit coupled to a power source. Phys Scr 2006, 73: 587–595. 10.1088/00318949/73/6/010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Park TJ: Canonical transformations for timedependent harmonic oscillators. Bull Korean Chem Soc 2004, 25: 285–288.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Cong J, He L, Koh CK, Madden PH: Performance optimization of VLSI interconnect layout. IntegrationVLSI J 1996, 21: 1–94. 10.1016/S01679260(96)000089View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Ayten UE, Sagbas M, Sedef H: Current mode leapfrog ladder filters using a new active block. Int J Electron Commun 2010, 64: 503–511. 10.1016/j.aeue.2009.03.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Jeltsema D, Scherpen JMA: A dual relation between portHamiltonian systems and the BraytonMoser equations for nonlinear switched RLC circuits. Automatica 2003, 39: 969–979. 10.1016/S00051098(03)000700View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Paulson EK, Martin RW, Zilm KW: Cross polarization, radio frequency field homogeneity, and circuit balancing in high field solid state NMR probes. J Magn Reson 2004, 171: 314–323. 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.09.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Babič M, Vertechy R, Berselli G, Lenarčič J, Castelli VP, Vassura G: An electronic driver for improving the open and closed loop electromechanical response of dielectric elastomer actuators. Mechatronics 2010, 20: 201–212. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2009.11.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 HajiNasiri S, Faez R, MoravvejFarshi MK: Stability analysis in multiwall carbon nanotube bundle interconnects. Microelectron Reliab 2012, 52: 3026–3034. 10.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.147View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Alioto M: Modeling strategies of the input admittance of RC interconnects for VLSI CAD tools. Microelectron J 2011, 42: 63–73. 10.1016/j.mejo.2010.09.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Parthasarathy S, Loganthurai P, Selvakumaran S, Rajasekaran DV: Harmonic mitigation in UPS system using PLL. Energy Procedia 2012, 14: 873–879.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Fathabadi H: Stability analysis of circuits including BJT differential pairs. Microelectron J 2010, 41: 834–839. 10.1016/j.mejo.2010.07.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Moller KB, Jorgensen TG, Dahl JP: Displaced squeezed number states: position space representation, inner product, and some applications. Phys Rev A 1996, 54: 5378–5385. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.5378View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Marchiolli MA, da Silva LF, Melo PS, Dantas CMA: Quantuminterference effects on the superposition of N displaced number states. Physica A 2001, 291: 449–466. 10.1016/S03784371(00)00529XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Narozhny NB, SanchezMondragon JJ, Eberly JH: Coherence versus incoherence: collapse and revival in a simple quantum model. Phys Rev A 1981, 23: 236–247. 10.1103/PhysRevA.23.236View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kim MS: Dissipation and amplification of JaynesCummings superposition states. J Mod Opt 1993, 40: 1331–1350. 10.1080/09500349314551391View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 ElOrany FAA, Obada AS: On the evolution of superposition of squeezed displaced number states with the multiphoton JaynesCummings model. J Opt B: Quant Semiclass Opt 2003, 5: 60–72. 10.1088/14644266/5/1/309View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 MoyaCessa H, Knight PL: Series representation of quantumfield quasiprobabilities. Phys Rev A 1993, 48: 2479–2481. 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.2479View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Satyanarayana MV: Generalized coherent states and generalized squeezed coherent states. Phys Rev D 1985, 32: 400–404. 10.1103/PhysRevD.32.400View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Loudon R, Knight PL: Squeezed light. J Mod Opt 1987, 34: 709–759. 10.1080/09500348714550721View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 AbdelAty M, Abd AlKader GM, Obada ASF: Entropy and entanglement of an effective twolevel atom interacting with two quantized field modes in squeezed displaced fock states. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 2001, 12: 2455–2470. 10.1016/S09600779(00)002150View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wang Xb, Oh CH, Kwek LC: General approach to functional forms for the exponential quadratic operators in coordinatemomentum space. J Phys A: Math Gen 1998, 31: 4329–4336. 10.1088/03054470/31/18/020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Thornton ST, Marion JB: Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems. Belmont: Brooks/Cole; 2004.Google Scholar
 Nieto MM: Functional forms for the squeeze and the timedisplacement operators. Quantum Semiclass Opt 1996, 8: 1061–1066. 10.1088/13555111/8/5/011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM: Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products. San Diego: Academic; 1994:. 804 804Google Scholar
 Nieto MM: Displaced and squeezed number states. Phys Lett A 1997, 229: 135–143. [Equation 45] [Equation 45] 10.1016/S03759601(97)001837View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Slusher RE, Hollberg LW, Yurke B, Mertz JC, Valley JF: Observation of squeezed states generated by fourwave mixing in an optical cavity. Phys Rev Lett 1985, 55: 2409–2412. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2409View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Marthaler M, Schön G, Shnirman A: Photonnumber squeezing in circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys Rev Lett 2008, 101: 147001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Szorkovszky A, Doherty AC, Harris GI, Bowen WP: Mechanical squeezing via parametric amplification and weak measurement. Phys Rev Lett 2011, 107: 213603.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Clerk AA, Marquardt F, Jacobs K: Backaction evasion and squeezing of a mechanical resonator using a cavity detector. New J Phys 2008, 10: 095010. 10.1088/13672630/10/9/095010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Obada ASF, Abd AlKader GM: Superpositions of squeezed displaced Fock states: properties and generation. J Mod Opt 1999, 46: 263–278.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kanenaga M: The origin of quantum fluctuations in microcanonical quantization. Phys Lett A 2004, 324: 145–151. 10.1016/j.physleta.2004.02.074View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.