Plasmonic bandgap in random media

  • Valentina V Zhurikhina1,

    Affiliated with

    • Michael I Petrov2, 3,

      Affiliated with

      • Oksana V Shustova1,

        Affiliated with

        • Yuri P Svirko3Email author and

          Affiliated with

          • Andrey A Lipovskii1, 2

            Affiliated with

            Nanoscale Research Letters20138:324

            DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-324

            Received: 6 June 2013

            Accepted: 9 July 2013

            Published: 16 July 2013


            We present a dispersion theory of the surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) in random metal-dielectric nanocomposite (MDN) consisting of bulk metal embedded with dielectric inclusions. We demonstrate that embedding of dielectric nanoparticles in metal results in the formation of the plasmonic bandgap due to strong coupling of the SPP at the metal-vacuum interface and surface plasmons localized at the surface of nanoinclusions. Our results show that MDN can replace metals in various plasmonic devices, which properties can be tuned in a wide spectral range. Being compatible with waveguides and other photonic structures, MDN offers high flexibility in the plasmonic system design.


            78.67.Sc, 81.05.Ni, 71.36.+c

            Metal-dielectric nanocomposite Surface plasmon polariton Drude metal Silver Dispersion


            The resonant coupling of light to oscillations of the free electron density near the metal surface, surface plasmons (SP), gave birth to a variety of advanced applications ranging from sensing to nonlinear optics. SPs are bound to the metallic surface, i.e., at the frequency of the surface plasmon resonance, light field exponentially decays in neighboring media. Since the decay length of SPs is two orders of magnitude smaller than the wavelength of the light in air, they can be employed for subwavelength localization of light. The guiding of light in plasmonic structures is possible via surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) that can propagate in periodical arrays of metal nanoparticles embedded in dielectrics. The multiple scattering of the SPPs off the periodic corrugation leads to the Bragg-like plasmon modes [1, 2] and to the plasmonic band gaps [1, 3], i.e., they do not allow the SPP in a certain interval of wavelengths. When metal nanoparticles are placed into dielectric in a random fashion, e.g., in metal island films [4, 5], nanoporous metal films [6], and metal-dielectric nanocomposite (MDN) [710], no SPP bandgaps have been observed. The optical properties of these materials dominated by SPs localized on individual metal nanoparticles are well studied [11, 12]; however, much less attention was paid to the behavior of SPP propagating at the MDN-dielectric interface. In this paper, we present the theory of SPP in MDN based on noble metals with random distribution of the dielectric inclusions. We demonstrate that when the metal volume content is high, the coupling of propagating and localized at metal-inclusion interface plasmon modes results in the formation of the SPP bandgap in such random media. By using Drude model for dielectric function of the metal, we develop dispersion theory of the SPP at the MDN-vacuum surface. We demonstrate that in silver, bandgap persists when dielectric properties of the metal are described by experimental data. The presence of the SPP bandgap indicates that the MDN can replace metals in various plasmonic structures that will benefit from the tunability of the MDN properties.


            We consider the interface between a dielectric with a real positive dielectric constant ϵ1 (z < 0) and a MDN with a frequency-dependent complex dielectric function ϵ2(ω) n (z > 0). The electric filed associated with SPP propagating along x-axis can be presented in the following form:
            E = E 1 exp i k SPP x δ 1 z , z > 0 E = E 2 exp i k SPP x + δ 2 z , z < 0
            where [13]
            k SPP 2 = ω 2 c 2 ϵ 1 ϵ 2 ϵ 1 + ϵ 2 , δ 1 , 2 2 = ω 2 c 2 ϵ 1 , 2 2 ϵ 1 + ϵ 2 .

            One can observe from Equations 1 and 2 that SPP is allowed at Re(ϵ2(ω) + ϵ1) < 0 when Re(k SPP ) ≠ 0 and Im(δ1,2) = 0. The condition Re(ϵ2(ω) + ϵ1) = 0 corresponds to the excitation of the surface plasmon [1, 13]. If Re(ϵ2(ω)) > 0, SPP is forbidden; however, a transversal bulk plasmon polariton (BPP) with wave vector k BPP = ω / c ϵ 2 ω can propagate at z > 0. If 0 > Re(ϵ2(ω)) > − ϵ1, no propagating electromagnetic perturbations are allowed, i.e., the energy of the incident light wave is transferred to the localized plasmons.

            When the concentration of dielectric inclusions g is relatively low (g < 0.15), the dielectric constant of the MDN can be described in the framework of Maxwell Garnett approach [14] for dielectric inclusions in metal that yields
            ϵ eff ω = ϵ ω 2 ϵ ω + ϵ d + 2 g ϵ d ϵ ω 2 ϵ ω + ϵ d g ϵ d ϵ ω .
            Assuming that the permittivity of metal can be described in terms of the Drude model with no scattering,
            ϵ ω = 1 ω p 2 ω 2 ,
            where ωp is the plasma frequency, the effective dielectric function can be presented as
            ϵ eff ω = 2 1 g 2 + g Ω TO 2 Ω LO 2 ω 2 ω p 2 ω 2 Ω LO 2 ω 2 ω 2 Ω TO 2
            Ω TO 2 = 2 ω p 2 1 g 2 + ϵ d g ϵ d 1 , Ω LO 2 = ω p 2 2 + g 2 + ϵ d + 2 g ϵ d 1 .

            One can see from Equation 5 that the effective dielectric function has singularities at ω = 0 and ω = ΩTO. The singularity at ω = 0 is a conventional ‘metal’ one, while the singularity at ω = ΩTO corresponds to the collective oscillations of the conduction electrons at the surface of dielectric nanoparticles incorporated into the metal matrix, i.e., localized surface plasmon resonance at the metal-dielectric interface. Frequency ΩLO corresponds to the excitation of the longitudinal phonons in the GMN.

            The surface plasmon frequency ωSC at the MDN-vacuum interface can be found from the condition ϵeff(ωSC) = −1. Solution of this equation yields
            ω SC 1 , 2 2 = 4 1 g ω p 2 [ 6 + ϵ d + g 2 ϵ d 3 ± 2 + ϵ d + g 2 ϵ d + 1 2 8 ϵ d 1 g 2 ] 1 ,
            i.e., two surface plasmon frequencies can exist. In pure metal (g = 0), SPP can propagate along the metal/vacuum interface at ω < ω p / 2[13]. However, at a finite dielectric content, g > 0, the SPP band splits into two, i.e., SPP is allowed at ωLO< ω < ωSC2 and ω < ωSC1. These two SPP bands are separated by a BPP band from ΩLO to ΩTO and a forbidden gap between ωSC1 and ΩTO (see Figure 1). Thus, strong coupling between SPP at the metal vacuum interface and localized surface plasmons at the surface of randomly distributed dielectric nanoinclusions results in the formation of the plasmonic bandgap, which is conventionally observed in plasmonic crystals.
            Figure 1

            Dispersion relation for plasmon polaritons and map of electromagnetic modes for Drude MDN without scattering. (a) Dispersion relation for plasmon polaritons at ωp = 1016 s−1, g = 0.1 and ϵd = 3.42 (blue line). The light line ω = ck is also shown. (b) Map of the electromagnetic modes in the g-ω plane. SPP and BPP exist in gray and hatched areas, respectively.

            Results and discussion

            The dispersion relation for propagating electromagnetic modes in Drude MDN with dielectric volume fraction g = 0.1 and ϵd = 3.42 is shown in Figure 1a. Figure 1b shows the map of collective excitations in Drude MDN in the ‘ω-g’ plane at ϵd= 3.42. One can observe two SPP bands, the BPP band, and the forbidden gap separated by frequencies ΩLO, ΩTO, and ωSC1. The upper limit of the higher SPP zone is ωSC2. There also exists the second BPP frequency range for ω > ωp. The width of both SPP and BPP bands increases with the increase of dielectric contained in MDN. The latter was earlier demonstrated by N. Stefanou and coauthors [15] for mesoporous metals. Our calculations also showed that the higher the permittivity of dielectric inclusions in MDN, the broader the upper SPP band and the bigger the downshift of the SPP forbidden gap.

            When g → 0, the upper MDN surface plasmon frequency ω SC 2 ω p / 2, that is, the surface plasmon frequency at metal-air interface, while ΩLO, ΩTO, and ωSC1 approach ω p 2 / 2 + ϵ d, that is, the SP resonance of a single dielectric cavity in metal matrix [15]. At ϵd > 2, the frequencies ΩLO, ΩTO, and ωSC1 are lower than ωSC2, and BPP zone and the conventional metal SPP band at ω < ωSC2 splits by two (see Figure 1b). At ϵd < 2, the ΩLO, ΩTO, and ωSC1 are higher than ωSC2, and the conventional metal SPP band at ω < ωSC2 remains intact, however, the second SPP band appears at ωLO< ω < ωSC2. At ϵ d = 2 and g = 0 , Ω LO = Ω TO = ω SC 1 = ω SC 2 = ω p / 2

            It is worth noting that the dielectric dispersion should change the characteristic frequencies that will lead to the frequency shift of all bands and, in the case of strong dispersion, could possibly result in broadening or vanishing of the second SPP band. But for the most optically transparent dielectrics, their dispersion is negligible compared to the metal one. In this paper we neglect the dielectric dispersion that is valid, for example, for glasses in the visible and near-infrared range.

            Although Drude approximation satisfactorily describes the optical properties of noble metals, the dissipation of light energy may essentially influence the electromagnetic modes in MDN. When the imaginary part of the metal permittivity is nonzero, the effective permittivity of the MDN is also complex, ϵ eff ω = ϵ eff I ω + i ϵ eff II ω; however, the SPP on the vacuum-MDN interface is allowed (i.e., ϵ eff I ω < 1 even at relatively high dielectric volume fractions. In particular, it has been shown both experimentally and theoretically that the gold-based MDN with dielectric volume fraction of g ≈ 0.5 supports SPP [6, 10]. Figure 2 presents the dependence of the real part of the effective dielectric function of MDN based on noble metals. By using the data for the complex dielectric function from Johnson and Christy [16], one can obtain that at ϵd = 3.42 (flint glass) and g = 0.1, the SPP is allowed in Au-, Cu- and Ag-based MDNs; however, the second SPP band occurs in the Ag-based MDN only. However, it is worth noting that even in the silver-based MDN, the SPP band splitting vanishes at ϵd < 2.25.
            Figure 2

            Real part of the effective dielectric function for the Au-, Cu- and Ag-based MDNs. The real part of the effective dielectric function ϵeff(ω) for the Au-, Cu- and Ag-based MDNs is calculated using Johnson and Christy [16] data and Equation 3 at ϵd = 3.42 at g = 0.1.

            Figure 3a shows the plasmon polariton dispersion in silver-based MDN at g = 0.1 and ϵd = 3.42 calculated using measured metal permittivity and plasma frequency [16]ωp = 1.39·1016s−1. One can observe from Figure 3a that at Re(k) > ω/c, there exist two SPP and two BPP bands.
            Figure 3

            Dispersion curve for silver-based MDN and map of electromagnetic modes. (a) The dispersion curve for silver-based MDN at ωp = 1.39·1016 s−1, g = 0.1 and ϵd = 3.42 (blue line). The light line ω=ck is also shown. (b) Map of the electromagnetic modes in the g-ω plane. SPP and BPP exist in gray and hatched areas, respectively.

            Figure 3b shows the map of collective excitations in silver-based MDN on the ω-g plane at ϵd = 3.42. One can observe that the shape and size of the gray area in which SPP is allowed is similar to that for Drude MDN (see Figure 1); however, the nonzero imaginary part of the dielectric permittivity of silver results in vanishing of the SPP bandgap at g < 0.03. Thus, only one surface plasmon polariton band exists at g < 0.03.


            We demonstrate that SPP bandgap can exist not only in plasmonic crystals but also in MDN with low dielectric volume fraction, i.e., when dielectric nanoinclusions are distributed in a random fashion in metal host. In the MDN, the SPP bandgap arises due to strong coupling between SPP at the metal-dielectric interface and plasmons localized on dielectric nanoinclusions allowing one to tailor the plasmonic properties by changing the dielectric content. By using Maxwell-Garnett model, we calculated effective dielectric permittivity of the MDN using both Drude model and Johnson and Christy data for complex dielectric function of metal. We showed that dissipation caused by the scattering of conduction electrons in metal may result in vanishing plasmonic bandgap in noble metal-based MDN. However, at refractive index of dielectric inclusions n > 1.5, the plasmonic bandgap survives in Ag-based MDN offering high flexibility in the plasmonic system design.

            Authors’ information

            VZh holds associate professor position at St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University. MP holds PhD degree at St. Petersburg Academic University. OSh is a PhD student at St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University. YuS holds DrSci degree and professor position at the University of Eastern Finland. AL holds DrSci degree and professor positions at St. Petersburg Academic University and St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University.



            Metal-dielectric nanocomposite


            Surface plasmons


            Surface plasmon polaritons.



            This study was supported by Russian foundation for Basic Research (project no. 12-02-91664), Russian Ministry for Education and Science, Joensuu University Foundation, Academy of Finland (project nos. 135815 and 137859) and EU (FP7 projects ‘NANOCOM’ and ‘AN2’).

            Authors’ Affiliations

            Department of Nanostructures Physics and Technology, St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University
            Department of Condensed Matter Physics, St. Petersburg Academic University
            Institute of Photonics, University of Eastern Finland


            1. Zayats AV, Smolyaninov II, Maradudin AA: Nano-optics of surface plasmon polaritons. Phys Rep 2005, 408: 131–314. 10.1016/j.physrep.2004.11.001View Article
            2. Smith CLC, Desiatov B, Goykmann I, Fernandez-Cuesta I, Levy U, Kristensen A: Plasmonic V-groove waveguides with Bragg grating filters via nanoimprint lithography. Opt Express 2012, 20: 5696–5706. 10.1364/OE.20.005696View Article
            3. de Ceglia D, Vincenti MA, Scalor M, Akozbek N, Bloemer MJ: Plasmonic band edge effects on the transmission properties of metal gratings. AIP Adv 2011, 1(032151):1–15.
            4. Genov DA, Shalaev VM, Sarychev AK: Surface plasmon excitation and correlation-induced localization-delocalization transition in semicontinuous metal films. Phys Rev B 2005, 72(113102):1–4.
            5. Chen W, Thoreson MD, Kildishev AV, Shalaev VM: Fabrication and optical characterizations of smooth silver-silica nanocomposite films. Laser Phys Lett 2010, 9: 677–684.View Article
            6. Sardana N, Heyroth F, Schilling J: Propagating surface plasmons on nanoporous gold. J Opt Soc Am B 2012, 29: 1778–1783. 10.1364/JOSAB.29.001778View Article
            7. Stockman MI, Kurlayev KB, George TF: Linear and nonlinear optical susceptibilities of Maxwell-Garnett composites: dipolar spectral theory. Phys Rev B 1999, 60: 17071–17083. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.17071View Article
            8. Thoreson MD, Fang J, Kildishev AV, Prokopeva LJ, Nyga P, Chettiar UK, Shalaev VM, Drachev VP: Fabrication and realistic modeling of three-dimensional metal-dielectric composites. J Nanophotonics 2011, 5(051513):1–17.
            9. Lu D, Kan J, Fullerton EE, Liu Z: Tunable surface plasmon polaritons in Ag composite films by adding dielectrics or semiconductors. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 243114–243117. 10.1063/1.3600661View Article
            10. Shi Z, Piredda G, Liapis AC, Nelson MA, Novotny L, Boyd RW: Surface plasmon polaritons on metal-dielectric nanocomposite films. Opt Lett 2009, 34: 3535–3537. 10.1364/OL.34.003535View Article
            11. Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC: The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107: 668–677.View Article
            12. Kreibig U, Vollmer M: Optical Properties of Metal Clusters. Berlin: Springer; 1995.View Article
            13. Agranovich VM, Mills DL: Surface Polaritons. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co; 1982.
            14. Maxwell Garnett JC: Colours in metal glasses and in metallic films. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 1904, 203: 385–420. 10.1098/rsta.1904.0024View Article
            15. Stefanou N, Modinos A, Yannopapas V: Optical transparency of mesoporous metals. Solid State Commun 2001, 118(2):69–73. 10.1016/S0038-1098(01)00038-2View Article
            16. Johnson PB, Christy RW: Optical constants of noble metals. Phys Rev B 1972, 6: 4370–4379. 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370View Article


            © Zhurikhina et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

            This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.