OPAA template-directed synthesis and optical properties of metal nanocrystals

  • Xiu-chun Yang1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Jun-wei Hou1, 2,

      Affiliated with

      • Yan Liu1,

        Affiliated with

        • Miao-miao Cui1 and

          Affiliated with

          • Wei Lu1

            Affiliated with

            Nanoscale Research Letters20138:328

            DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-328

            Received: 5 June 2013

            Accepted: 10 July 2013

            Published: 18 July 2013


            Ag and Cu nanocrystals (NCs) were assembled into ordered porous anodic alumina (OPAA) by a single-potential-step chronoamperometry technique. The composition, morphology, microstructure, and optical property were analyzed by X-ray diffraction, field-emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, selected area electron diffraction, and optical absorption spectroscopy. The results indicate that metallic NCs/OPAA composite possesses a significant surface plasmon resonance absorption. For continuous electrodeposition, metallic nanowires are smooth and uniform with face-centered cubic (fcc) single-crystalline structure; however, for interval electrodeposition, the nanowires are bamboo-like or pearl-chain-like with fcc polycrystalline structure. The length of the nanoparticle nanowires or the single-crystalline nanowires can be controlled well by adjusting the experimental cycle times or the continuous depositing time. The transverse dipole resonance of metallic NCs enhances and displays a blue shift with increasing electrodeposition time or experimental cycle times, which is consistent with Zong's results but contradictory to Duan's results. The formation mechanisms of the nanoparticle nanowires and the single-crystalline nanowires were discussed in detail.


            Nanostructures Chemical synthesis Electron microscopy Optical properties


            The optical properties derived from nanostructured metallo-dielectric composites have attracted worldwide attention both from experimental and theoretical aspects[13]. The absorption spectrum of metallic nanoparticles could be attributed to surface plasmon resonance (SPR), i.e., collective oscillations of conduction electrons driven by the incident light field. The SPR frequency depends strongly on the metal composition, structure (solid, hollow, and core shell), size and shape, the dielectric properties of the surrounding medium, and inter-nanoparticle coupling interactions[411]. The fascinating optical properties of metal NCs find important applications in a number of technological areas including biological imaging, sensing and detection[1220], photothermal imaging and therapy[21, 22], surface-enhanced Raman scattering[2327], plasmon-enhanced fluorescence[2830], integrated nanophotonic devices[3133], photovoltaic devices[34], data storage[35, 36], and nonlinear optics[37, 38].

            To identify whether a resonance originates from a longitudinal mode or a transverse mode, well-aligned metal nanowires represent an ideal configuration. For examples, Zong et al.[3941] reported that a dual peak appeared when the incident light was perpendicular to the surface of the composite film of Ag nanowire arrays in anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) template. The two peaks were ascribed to the transverse dipole resonance (longer wavelength) and the transverse quadrupole resonance (shorter wavelength), respectively. The quadrupole resonance peak displayed a distinct red shifting from 350 to 365 nm and became the strong peak when the diameter reached 40 nm. Duan et al.[42] also reported that a dual peak appeared when the incident light was perpendicular to the surface of the composite film of Cu nanowire arrays in ion-track templates. The dual peak with a shorter wavelength was attributed to interband transition of Cu bulk metal, and the dual peak with a longer wavelength was ascribed to transverse dipolar peak, which displayed red a shift with increasing nanowire length. This result is obviously different from the blue shift reported by Zong et al. In order to clarify the difference, a new procedure to electrochemically fill ordered porous anodic alumina (OPAA) was developed where porous alumina remained on the aluminum substrate and the barrier layer was very thin by using a step-by-step voltage decrement process[43]. The thinning leads to a considerable decrease in the potential barrier for the electrons to tunnel through the barrier layer, when the metal is deposited at the pore tips. Ag and Cu nanocrystals (NCs) were successfully assembled into the ordered OPAA by a single-potential-step chronoamperometry technique, and the influences of preparation processes on the morphology, structure, and optical property of metallic NCs were deeply investigated.


            A highly ordered OPAA template with uniform pore diameters of about 60 nm and smooth pore channels perpendicular to the membrane surface was fabricated by a two-step anodization process plus a step-by-step voltage decrement method as described previously[43, 44]. The high purity alumina foil (99.999%) with size of 2 cm × 2 cm × 0.5 mm was firstly annealed at 500°C for 5 h and ultrasonic cleaned for 3 min in acetone, ethanol, and deionized water, respectively. The native oxide layer was removed in 2 mol/L NaOH solution at 60°C for 2 min. Then, the aluminum foil was anodized in 0.3 mol/L oxalic acid aqueous solution under constant voltage (40 V) and constant temperature (5°C). After anodization for 4 h, the formed alumina was removed by a mixture solution of phosphoric and chromic acids. Afterward, the foil was anodized for 5 h again at the same condition as the first anodization. In order to promote thinning of the barrier, the anodic voltage was gradually lowered to 30 V by 2 V/min and then to 5 V by 1 V/min after the second anodic process. The anodization at 5 V continued for 10 min to allow the equilibration of the barrier layer at the pore bottom. Finally, the template was obtained by a subsequent etching treatment in 5 wt.% phosphoric acid (35°C) for 30 min. Electrodeposition was performed on LK98II electrochemical system (Lanlike, Tianjin, China) using the single-potential-step chronoamperometry technique. In the electrodeposition cell, the OPAA template with Al substrate, Pt plate, and saturated calomel electrode were used as the working electrode, the counter electrode, and the reference electrode, respectively. Samples Ag1 and Ag2 were electrochemically deposited in a mixture of 0.05 mol/L AgNO3 and 0.05 mol/L H3BO3 aqueous solutions at −6.5 V for 50 and 100 s, respectively. Samples Ag3, Ag4, and Ag5 were electrochemically deposited in a mixture of 0.01 mol/L AgNO3 and 0.01 mol/L H3BO3 aqueous solutions at a depositing potential of −6.5 V with deposition time of 2 s and interval time of 5 s. Experimental cycle times of 20, 50, and 100 were used for samples Ag3, Ag4, and Ag5, respectively. Sample Cu1 was electrochemically deposited in a mixture of 0.2 mol/L CuSO4 and 0.01 mol/L H3BO3 aqueous solutions at −6.0 V for 400 s. Samples Cu2, Cu3, and Cu4 were electrochemically deposited in a mixture of 0.01 mol/L Cu(NO3)2 and 0.1 mol/L H3BO3 aqueous solution at a depositing potential of −8.5 V with deposition time of 1 s and interval time of 5 s. Experimental cycle times of 150, 200, and 300 were used for samples Cu2, Cu3, and Cu4, respectively. Here, H3BO3 was used as buffer reagent. After deposition, the samples were rinsed with deionized water, and then, the Al substrate was removed by 10 wt.% CuCl2 aqueous solutions.

            Hitachi (Chiyoda-ku, Japan) 3310 UV–vis spectrophotometer was used to measure optical absorption of these samples using an unpolarized light beam at normal incidence to the sample plane. Quanta 200 FEG scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS) was used to characterize the morphology and elemental composition. H-800 transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Hitachi Ltd., Chiyoda-ku, Japan) was used to analyze the morphology and microstructure of these samples. TEM samples were prepared by immersing a small piece of Ag/OPAA or Cu/OPAA film in 2 mol/L NaOH solution for about 5 h (60°C) in order to dissolve the OPAA template. Ag NCs or Cu NCs were afterward separated out of the solution by centrifugal effects. Finally, the deposit was ultrasonically dispersed in 3 to 5 mL ethanol, and a drop of the suspended solution was placed on a Cu grid with carbon membrane for TEM observation.

            Results and discussion

            Synthesis of Ag NCs

            Figure 1 gives SEM images of the ordered OPAA template. Figure 1a shows that the honeycomb-like template is highly ordered with circular holes and hexagonal structure cell. The pore diameter and pore density are approximately 60 nm and 1 × l010 cm−2, respectively. Figure 1b indicates that the pore channels are smooth and parallel to each other.
            Figure 1

            SEM images of the OPAA template. (a) Top view, (b) cross-sectional view.

            Figure 2 gives TEM images and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of samples Ag1 and Ag2.
            Figure 2

            TEM images of samples Ag1 (a) and Ag2 (b); XRD pattern (c) and SAED diagram (d) of sample Ag2.

            Figure 2a indicates that sample Ag1 is mainly composed of nanoparticles with a size range of 20 to 70 nm, and a few nanorods exist in the sample. Figure 2b indicates that sample Ag2 is mainly consisted of nanowires with diameters of 50 to 70 nm and an average length of 500 nm. Four peaks can be observed in the XRD patterns, as shown in Figure 2c, which correspond to (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes of face-centered cubic (fcc) silver (PDF no. 04–0783), respectively. The diffraction peak intensities are higher for sample Ag2 than sample Ag1 because sample Ag2 has a longer deposition time than sample Ag1. For sample Ag2, the (111) diffraction peak intensity is relatively higher while other peak intensities are very lower to the standard diffraction pattern of fcc Ag bulk, indicating that Ag nanocrystals were electrodeposited into the pores and grew along [111] direction as preferred orientation. As described in broken bond theory[45], fcc metals have an anisotropic surface free energy and hold a regressive sequence of (110), (100), and (111) facets. Therefore, the fcc metals such as gold, silver, copper, palladium, and nickel naturally prefer to grow with a [111] orientation[46, 47], which are different from the reference's report that the fcc metals have a preferred growth orientation of [110] under direct current deposition conditions because (110) surface energy is lowest when the aspect ratio is larger than 1[48]. Figure 2d gives the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of a nanowire in sample Ag2, indicating that the Ag nanowire possesses a single-crystalline fcc structure.

            In order to follow the deposition process, the current was recorded as a function of time as shown in Figure 3.
            Figure 3

            Current-time curve of sample Ag1.

            When a potential is applied, the current is large at t = 0 due to the charge of the electrical double layer and reduction of Ag+ at the cathode surface. The reduction of Ag+ ions at the cathode surface creates a concentration gradient that causes a flux of ions toward the cathode. In this process, the decrease of current indicates the formation of the diffusion layer. The current remains nearly constant and is very low because Ag+ ions diffuse slowly through the branched channel of OPAA template near the barrier layer. The current increases when some Ag nanowires grow into the main pore channel of OPAA template because of larger pore diameter and faster Ag+ ion diffusion in the main pore channel than in the branched channel.

            Figure 4 gives TEM images of samples Ag3 and Ag4.
            Figure 4

            TEM images of samples Ag3 (a, c) and Ag4 (b), and SAED diagram (d) of sample Ag3.

            Figure 4a, b shows that the nanowires in samples Ag3 and Ag4 have nearly the same average diameter of about 70 nm and different lengths of 1 to 1.5 μm and 1.5 to 1.8 μm, respectively. The nanowire is longer in sample Ag4 due to the longer electrodeposition time. Figure 4c indicates that the nanowires have bamboo-like or pearl-chain-like structure; SAED pattern in Figure 4d indicates that the nanowires are polycrystalline with fcc structure.

            Figure 5 gives XRD patterns of samples Ag3 and Ag4.
            Figure 5

            XRD patterns of samples Ag3 and Ag4.

            The XRD patterns indicate that samples Ag3 and Ag4 are composed of face-centered cubic Ag NCs, longer electrodeposition time favors the growth of Ag NCs. The calculated grain sizes are 32 nm for sample Ag3 and 29 nm for sample Ag4 based on the Scherrer's formula from (111) diffraction peaks.

            Figure 6 gives FESEM images and the corresponding EDS spectrum of sample Ag5.
            Figure 6

            FESEM images of sample Ag5. (a) Top view; (b) cross-sectional image with an inserted EDS spectrum from the marked rectangular area; (c) local magnified image of (b); (d) schematic diagram for the formation of Ag nanoparticle nanowires.

            Figure 6 indicates that the pores of OPAA template are highly filled by Ag nanoparticle nanowires. The Ag nanoparticles are nearly spherical, and their size distribution lies in the range of 45 to 75 nm. The Ag nanoparticle nanowires clustered together after the OPAA template was dissolved in 1 mol/L NaOH solution for 1 h. The cluster effect originates from the relatively high surface free energy of the Ag nanoparticle nanowires. The nanowires in samples Ag1 and Ag2 prepared by continuous electrodeposition are single-crystalline with smooth surface and nearly uniform diameters; however, the nanowires in samples Ag3, Ag4, and Ag5 prepared by interval electrodeposition are polycrystalline with bamboo-like or pearl-chain-like structure. For the continuous electrodeposition, Ag+ ions at the electrode surface are reduced into neutral Ag atoms, which nucleate and grow subsequently. This brings on a significant decrease of Ag+ concentration at the electrode surface because the electrophoresis diffusion of Ag+ ions in electrolyte is slow through the nanopore channel to the electrode. After electro-reducing, neutral Ag atoms deposit on the initial nanocrystals by epitaxial growth because the concentration of neutral Ag atoms is too low to heteronucleate on the initial nanoparticles. The epitaxial growth ensures the single-crystalline feature of Ag nanowire[46]. For the interval electrodeposition, Ag+ ions have enough time to diffuse to the electrode surface, after next electrodeposition, enough Ag+ ions are reduced into neutral Ag atoms, which can heteronucleate on the previous nanoparticles and grow into bamboo-like or pearl-chain-like nanowires, as shown in Figure 6d. The structure and morphology of nanowires depend on the preparation parameters such as the electrolyte concentration, the electrodeposition time and the interval time, the electropotential, the pore diameter, and channel morphology of the template[46, 47].

            Synthesis of Cu NCs

            Figure 7 gives the FESEM images of sample Cu1.
            Figure 7

            FESEM images of sample Cu1. (a) middle part of cross-section, (b) the end of cross-section.

            Figure 7 indicates that most nanochannels were filled by Cu nanowires with a diameter of 120 nm. The diameter is larger than the pore diameter of OPAA template because the nanowire is composed of Cu core and Al2O3 shell where the core is from Cu nanowire and the shell is from the pore wall of the OPAA template.

            Figure 8 gives the XRD pattern and the current-time curve of sample Cu1
            Figure 8

            XRD pattern (a) and the current-time curve (b) of sample Cu1.

            There diffraction peaks in Figure 8a can be indexed as (111), (200), and (220) diffraction planes of fcc Cu, respectively, which further demonstrates that sample Cu1 is composed of metallic Cu. The current rises abruptly at time zero to charge the double layer, subsequently, the current rises slowly with a little variation because Cu2+ ions diffuse slowly through the branched channel of OPAA template near the barrier layer. The current further increases with a higher rate after 100 s because some nanowires in branched channels grow into main pore channels of the template where Cu2+ ions have a higher diffusion rate.

            Figure 9 gives the FESEM images and XRD pattern of sample Cu4.
            Figure 9

            FESEM images and XRD pattern of sample Cu4. (a) Top view with EDS spectrum, (b) cross-sectional view with a low magnification, (c) local magnified image, (d) XRD pattern.

            Figure 9a indicates that nearly all pores of the template were filled by Cu nanowires. The cross-sectional images, as shown in Figure 9b, c, indicate that the template has a thickness of 11 μm, and only 5.5-μm pore channels near the barrier layer were filled by Cu nanoparticles with long-axis diameters of 40 to 105 nm, which formed Cu nanoparticle nanowires in the pore channel. Figure 9d further demonstrates that the nanoparticle nanowires are composed of fcc Cu metal with a calculated grain size of 33 nm based on Scherrer's formula. Similar to Ag nanowires, Cu nanowires prepared by continuous electrodeposition are single-crystalline with smooth surface and nearly uniform diameter, and Cu nanowires prepared by interval electrodeposition are polycrystalline with bamboo-like or pearl-chain-like structure.

            Optical properties of metallic NCs/OPAA

            Figure 10 gives optical absorption spectra of samples Ag1, Ag2, Ag3, Ag4, and Ag5, and samples Cu2, Cu3, and Cu4.
            Figure 10

            Optical absorption spectra (a) samples Ag1 and Ag2; (b) Ag3, Ag4, and Ag5; (c) Cu2, Cu3, and Cu4.

            Figure 10a indicates that the OPAA template has a very weak absorption at the wavelength longer than 350 nm, indicating that it can be an excellent matrix for fabrication of optical devices. Sample Ag2 has a dual peak at 414 and 386 nm, which is similar to Zong's results[3941]. As well known, the longitudinal resonance cannot be excited when the unpolarized light beam is parallel to the major axis of Ag NCs. Therefore, the peak at 414 nm can be denoted as the transverse dipole resonance of Ag NCs and the peak at 386 nm can be denoted as the quadrupole resonance of Ag NCs. Zong et al. reported that the quadrupole resonance peak displays a distinct red shifting to 365 nm when the diameter reaches 40 nm. Ag nanowires in sample Ag2 have diameters of 50 to 70 nm, larger than 40 nm; therefore, its quadrupole resonance peak shifts to 386 nm. The much stronger absorption in sample Ag2 than in sample Ag1 indicates that the electrodeposition rate of Ag NCs became faster after 50 s. This is consistent with the above-mentioned results in Figures 1 and2. Figure 9b indicates that the transverse dipole resonance of Ag NCs enhances and has a blue shift with increasing electrodeposition time, which is consistent with Gan's theory[49]. Figure 10c indicates that sample Cu2 has an absorption peak at 579 nm, which can be denoted as the transverse dipole resonance of Cu NCs. The transverse dipole resonance of Cu NCs enhances and has a little blue shift with increasing electrodeposition time, which is similar to Zong's report[39] where the transverse resonance peak shifts to shorter wavelength with the increase of the wire length. However, it is obviously different from Duan's report where the dipolar peak with a shorter wavelength was attributed to interband transition of Cu bulk metal, and the dipolar peak with a longer wavelength shifted to larger wavelengths with increasing wire length. In fact, the pores in the ion-track template are not aligned parallel but have a considerable angular distribution of 34°[50]; hence, some Cu nanowires filled in the template are not perpendicular to the template surface, as shown in Figure 2 in[42]. Therefore, some nanowires are not parallel to incident light though the incident light was perpendicular to the template surface. Based on these analyses, we suggest that the shorter dipolar peak should be the transverse dipole resonance of Cu NCs, and the longer dipolar peak should be the longitudinal resonance of Cu NCs, which displays a red shift with increasing the aspect ratio.


            Ag and Cu nanocrystals (NCs) were assembled into ordered porous anodic alumina (OPAA) by the single-potential-step chronoamperometry technique. For continuous electrodeposition, metallic nanowires are single crystalline with fcc structure; however, for interval electrodeposition, the nanowires are polycrystalline with bamboo-like or pearl-chain-like structure. The formation mechanisms of the nanoparticle nanowires and the single-crystalline nanowires were discussed in detail. The NCs/OPAA composite shows a significant SPR absorption. The transverse dipole resonance of metallic NCs enhances and has a blue shift with increasing electrodeposition time or the experimental cycle times. The NCs/OPAA composite will have promising applications in many fields related to the surface plasmon resonance of metal nanoparticles.



            This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 50672069), Key Project for Basic Research, Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai municipal government (08JC419000), and the Nanotechnology Special Foundation of Shanghai (no. 11 nm0500700).

            Authors’ Affiliations

            Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University
            Research Institute of Experiment and Detection, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company


            1. Kreibig U, Vollmer M: Optical properties of metal clusters. Berlin: Springer; 1995.View Article
            2. Bohren CF, Huffman DR: Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. New York: Wiley; 1983.
            3. Jain PK, Lee KS, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA: Gold and silver nanoparticles in sensing and imaging: sensitivity of Plasmon response to size, shape, and metal composition. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110: 7238. 10.1021/jp057170oView Article
            4. Link S, El-Sayed MA: Spectral properties and relaxation dynamics of surface plasmon electronic oscillations in gold and silver nanodots and nanorods. J Phys Chem B 1999, 103: 8410. 10.1021/jp9917648View Article
            5. Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC: The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107: 668.View Article
            6. Link S, Mohamed MB, El-Sayed MA: Simulation of the optical absorption spectra of gold nanorods as a function of their aspect ratio and the effect of the medium dielectric constant. J Phys Chem B 1999, 103: 3073.View Article
            7. Kooij ES, Ahmed W, Zandvliet HJW, Poelsema B: Localized plasmons in noble metal nanospheroids. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 10321. 10.1021/jp112085sView Article
            8. Yang XC, Liu HX, Li LL, Huang M, Zhao JF: Review on influence factors of surface plasmon resonance for noble metal nanoparticles. Chin J Funct Mater 2010, 41: 341.
            9. Sun YG, Xia YN: Gold and silver nanoparticles: a class of chromophores with colors tunable in the range from 400 to 750 nm. Analyst 2003, 128: 686. 10.1039/b212437hView Article
            10. Chan GH, Zhao J, Hicks EM, Schatz GC, Duyne RPV: Plasmonic properties of copper nanoparticles fabricated by nanosphere lithography. Nano Lett 1947, 2007: 7.
            11. Su KH, Wei QH, Zhang X, Mock JJ, Smith DR, Schultz S: Interparticle coupling effects on plasmon resonances of nanogold particles. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 1087. 10.1021/nl034197fView Article
            12. El-Sayed IH, Huang X, El-Sayed MA: Surface plasmon resonance scattering and absorption of anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles in cancer diagnostics: applications in oral cancer. Nano Lett 2005, 5: 829. 10.1021/nl050074eView Article
            13. Raschke G, Kowarik S, Franzl T, Sönnichsen C, Klar TA, Feldmann J, Nichtl A, Kürzinger K: Biomolecular recognition based on single gold nanoparticle light scattering. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 935. 10.1021/nl034223+View Article
            14. Rosi NL, Mirkin CA: Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. Chem Rev 2005, 105: 1547. 10.1021/cr030067fView Article
            15. Alivisatos AP: The use of nanocrystals in biological detection. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22: 47. 10.1038/nbt927View Article
            16. Haes AJ, Van Duyne RP: A nanoscale optical biosensor: sensitivity and selectivity of an approach based on the localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy of triangular silver nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124: 10596. 10.1021/ja020393xView Article
            17. Sönnichsen C, Reinhard BM, Liphardt J, Alivisatos AP: A molecular ruler based on plasmon coupling of single gold and silver nanoparticles. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23: 741. 10.1038/nbt1100View Article
            18. Jain PK, Huang XH, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA: Noble metals on the nanoscale: optical and photothermal properties and some applications in imaging, sensing, biology, and medicine. Accounts Chem. Res 2008, 41: 1578. 10.1021/ar7002804View Article
            19. Jain PK, Huang X, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA: Review of some interesting surface plasmon resonance-enhanced properties of noble metal nanoparticles and their applications to biosystems. Plasmonics 2007, 2: 107. 10.1007/s11468-007-9031-1View Article
            20. Zhang JZ, Noguez C: Plasmonic optical properties and applications of metal nanostructures. Plasmonics 2008, 3: 127. 10.1007/s11468-008-9066-yView Article
            21. Lal S, Clare SE, Halas NJ: Nanoshell-enabled photothermal cancer therapy: impending clinical impact. Accounts Chem Res 1842, 2008: 41.
            22. Huang X, El-Sayed IH, Qian W, El-Sayed MA: Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128: 2115. 10.1021/ja057254aView Article
            23. Itoh T, Hashimoto K, Ozakia Y: Direct demonstration for changes in surface plasmon resonance induced by surface-enhanced Raman scattering quenching of dye molecules adsorbed on single Ag nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 2003, 83: 2274. 10.1063/1.1604188View Article
            24. Xu HX, Bjerneld EJ, Käll M, Börjesson L: Spectroscopy of single hemoglobin molecules by surface enhanced Raman scattering. Phys Rev Lett 1999, 83: 4357. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4357View Article
            25. Kondo T, Nishio K, Masuda H: Surface-enhanced Raman scattering in multilayered Au nanoparticles in anodic porous alumina matrix. Appl Phys Exp 2009, 2: 32001.View Article
            26. Ji N, Ruan WD, Wang CX: Fabrication of silver decorated anodic aluminum oxide substrate and its optical properties on surface-enhanced Raman scattering and thin film interference. Langmuir 2009, 25: 11869. 10.1021/la901521jView Article
            27. Nie S, Emory SR: Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Science 1997, 275: 1102. 10.1126/science.275.5303.1102View Article
            28. Anger P: Enhancement and quenching of single-molecule fluorescence. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 96: 113002.View Article
            29. Kühn S, Håkanson U, Rogobete L, Sandoghdar V: Enhancement of single-molecule fluorescence using a gold nanoparticle as an optical nanoantenna. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97: 17402.View Article
            30. Le Ru EC, Etchegoin PG, Grand J, Félidj N, Aubard J, Lévi G: Mechanisms of spectral profile modification in surface-enhanced fluorescence. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111: 16076. 10.1021/jp076003gView Article
            31. Maier SA, Brongersma ML, Kik PG, Meltzer S, Requicha AAG, Atwater HA: Plasmonics—a route to nanoscale optical devices. Adv Mater 2001, 13: 1501. 10.1002/1521-4095(200110)13:19<1501::AID-ADMA1501>3.0.CO;2-ZView Article
            32. Schuller JA, Barnard ES, Cai WS, Jun YC, White JS, Brongersma ML: Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation. Nat Mater 2010, 9: 193. 10.1038/nmat2630View Article
            33. Barnes WL, Dereux A, Ebbesen TW: Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 2003, 424: 824. 10.1038/nature01937View Article
            34. Atwater HA, Polman A: Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices. Nat Mater 2010, 9: 205. 10.1038/nmat2629View Article
            35. O’Connor D, Zayats AV: Data storage: the third plasmonic revolution. Nat Nanotechnol 2010, 5: 482. 10.1038/nnano.2010.137View Article
            36. Stipe BC, Strand TC, Poon CC, Balamane H, Boone TD, Katine JA, Li JL, Rawat V, Nemoto H, Hirotsune A, Hellwig O, Ruiz R, Dobisz E, Kercher DS, Robertson N, Albrecht TR, Terris BD: Magnetic recording at 1.5 Pb m−2 using an integrated plasmonic antenna. Nat Photonics 2010, 4: 484. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.90View Article
            37. Yang XC, Li ZH, Li WJ: Optical properties of Ag nanoparticle-glass composites. Chin Sci Bull 2008, 53: 695. 10.1007/s11434-008-0146-3View Article
            38. Yang XC, Dong ZW, Liu HX: Effects of thermal treatment on the third-order optical nonlinearity and ultrafast dynamics of Ag nanoparticles embedded in silicate glasses. Chem Phys Lett 2009, 475: 256. 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.05.055View Article
            39. Zong RL, Zhou J, Li B: Optical properties of transparent copper nanorod and nanowire arrays embedded in anodic alumina oxide. J Chem Phys 2005, 123: 94710. 10.1063/1.2018642View Article
            40. Zong RL, Zhou J, Li Q: Linear and nonlinear optical properties of Ag nanorods/AAM composite films. Chem Phys Lett 2004, 398: 224. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.09.059View Article
            41. Zong RL, Zhou J, Li Q, Du B, Li B, Fu M, Qi XW, Li LT, Buddhudu S: Synthesis and optical properties of silver nanowire arrays embedded in anodic alumina membrane. J Phys Chem B 2004, 108: 16713. 10.1021/jp0474172View Article
            42. Duan JL, Cornelius TW, Liu J, Karim S, Yao HJ, Picht O, Rauber M, Mueller S, Neumann R: Surface plasmon resonances of Cu nanowire arrays. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 13583. 10.1021/jp902894rView Article
            43. Yang XC, Zou X, Liu Y: Preparation and characteristics of large-area and high-filling Ag nanowire arrays in OPAA template. Mater Lett 2010, 64: 1451. 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.03.054View Article
            44. Yang XC, Zou X, Liu Y, Li XN: Preparation and characteristics of Cu/AAO composite. J Funct Mater (Chinese) 2010, 41: 321.
            45. Mackenzie JE, Moore AJW, Nicholas JF: Bonds broken at atomically flat crystal surfaces—I: face-centred and body-centred cubic crystals. J Phys Chem Solids 1962, 23: 185. 10.1016/0022-3697(62)90001-XView Article
            46. Tian ML, Wang JG, Kurtz J, Mallouk TE, Chan MHW: Electrochemical growth of single-crystal metal nanowires via a two-dimensional nucleation and growth mechanism. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 919. 10.1021/nl034217dView Article
            47. Wang HW, Shieh CF, Chen HY, Shiu WC, Russo B, Cao GZ: Standing [111] gold nanotube to nanorod arrays via template growth. Nanotechnology 2006, 17: 2689. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/10/041View Article
            48. Maurer F, Brötz J, Karim S, Molares MET, Trautmann C, Fuess H: Preferred growth orientation of metallic fcc nanowires under direct and alternating electrodeposition conditions. Nanotechnology 2007, 18: 135709. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/13/135709View Article
            49. Eustis S, El-Sayed MA: Determination of the aspect ratio statistical distribution of gold nanorods in solution from a theoretical fit of the observed inhomogeneously broadened longitudinal plasmon resonance absorption spectrum. J Appl Phys 2006, 100: 044324. 10.1063/1.2244520View Article
            50. Schönenberger C, Van Der Zande BMI, Fokkink LGJ, Henny M, Schmid C, Krüger M, Bachtold A, Huber R, Birk H, Staufer U: Template synthesis of nanowires in porous polycarbonate membranes: electrochemistry and morphology. J Phys Chem B 1997, 101: 5497. 10.1021/jp963938gView Article


            © Yang et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

            This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.