Open Access

Theoretical study of edge states in BC2N nanoribbons with zigzag edges

Nanoscale Research Letters20138:341

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-341

Received: 24 May 2013

Accepted: 23 July 2013

Published: 31 July 2013

Abstract

In this paper, electronic properties of BC2N nanoribbons with zigzag edges are studied theoretically using a tight binding model and the first-principles calculations based on the density functional theories. The zigzag BC2N nanoribbons have the flat bands when the atoms are arranged as B-C-N-C along the zigzag lines. In this arrangement, the effect of charge transfer is averaged since B and N atoms are doped in same sublattice sites. This effect is important for not only the formation of flat bands but also for the validity of the tight binding model for such system.

Keywords

Edge states Flat bands Zigzag BC2N nanoribbons; Tight binding model; First-principles calculations

Background

Graphene nanoribbons are finite-width graphene sheets, which are the one of the famous examples of nanocarbon materials[1, 2]. The electronic properties of graphene nanoribbons strongly depend on the edge structures. Graphene nanoribbons with zigzag edges have the so-called flat bands at the Fermi level[1, 2]. The states corresponding the flat bands are localized at the zigzag edges, i.e., the namely edge states[1, 2]. In the honeycomb lattice, there are two inequivalent sites, A and B sublattices. For the formation of edge states, this sublattice structure plays decisive role[1, 2].

On the other hand, boron-carbon-nitiride (BCN) materials, such as BCN nanotubes and graphite-like BCN, were synthesized by many groups[37]. Quite recently, BCN sheets with BN and graphene domains were synthesized by Ci et al.[8]. Furthermore, a controllability of domain shapes was reported[9]. Fabrication of BCN nanoribbons was expected[1014]. Therefore, such systems attract considerable interest for application for future electric and optoelectric materials.

Graphite-like BC2N sheet is one of the example of BCN, which was synthesized using chemical vapor depositions of boron trichloride, BCl3, and acetronitrile, CH3CN[15, 16]. The stabilities and electronic properties of BC2N sheets were investigated by several authors[1719]. The electronic and magnetic properties of nanoribbons made with BC2N sheets were also investigated by several authors[2024]. The magnetism in BC2N nanoribbons is predicted[20, 21, 23, 24]. Xu et al. reported the presence of linear dispersion when atoms are arranged as C-B-N-C in the transverse direction[22].

Previously, the authors reported that the flat bands appear in zigzag BC2N nanoribbons where the atoms are arranged as B-C-N-C along the zigzag lines using a tight binding (TB) model[24]. The TB approximation is an efficient method to describe the electronic properties compared with the density functional theories (DFT). In the TB approximation, however, the effect of the charge transfer is absent, resulting in the failure of TB model for B- and N-doped nanocarbon system. The purpose of the paper was to investigate the effect of charge transfer in BC2N nanoribbons theoretically.

In this paper, we investigate the electronic properties of BC2N nanoribbons with zigzag edges using the TB model and the first-principles calculations based on DFT. The zigzag BC2N nanoribbons have the flat bands and edge states when atoms are arranged as B-C-N-C along the zigzag lines. The validity of TB approximation is discussed.

Methods

We shall consider four different structures of BC2N nanoribbons with zigzag edges, as shown in Figure1. In this figure, B (N) atoms are indicated by the red (blue) circles and C atoms are located the empty verticies. Let N be the number of zigzag lines of BC2N nanoribbons. The dashed rectangles represent the unit cell of BC2N nanoribbons. It should be noted that these nanoribbons were made of the same BC2N sheet indicated by the yellow-shaded dotted lines in Figure1 which is the model-I introduced in[17]. The four different models are constructed by cutting the same BC2N sheet by changing the cutting positions. In these models, the atoms on the edges are different, as shown in Figure1. It should be noted that the atoms are arranged as B-C-N-C along zigzag lines in models A and B while do not in models C and D.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-341/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1684_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Schematics of BC2N nanoribbons of the models A (a), B (b), C (c), and D (d). The red (blue) circles represent B (N) atoms and C atoms are located at the vertices of hexagons. The yellow-shaded dotted lines represent the unit cell of BC2N sheet of the model-I introduced in[17]. The unit cell of BC2N nanoribbons were indicated by the dashed rectangles.

We performed the first-principles calculations based on DFT using the local density approximation (LDA) and the projector augmented wave method implemented in VASP code. The cell size in the one-dimensional direction was measured by the lattice constant of BC2N sheet, a = 4.976 Å, and the ribbons were isolated by vacuum region with about 12 Å in thickness. The outermost atoms are terminated by single H atoms. The geometry was fully optimized when the maximum forces fell down below 10−3 eV/Å. The cutoff energy of the plane wave basis set was chosen to be 400 eV, and the k-point sampling was chosen to be 12 in the one-dimensional direction. Although we found the finite spin polarization in BC2N nanoribbons, we restricted spin unpolarized calculations. The results of spin-polarized band structures will be reported in future publications elsewhere together with other models of BC2N nanoribbons.

The Hamiltonian of the system within TB model of π-electrons is given by
H = i E i c i c i i , j t i , j c i c j ,
(1)

where E i is an energy of π electron at the site i; c i and c i are the creation and annihilation operators of electrons at the lattice site i, respectively; 〈i,j〉 stands for summation over the adjacent atoms; and ti,j is the hopping integral of π electrons from j th atom to i th atom. E i are the site energies, EB, E C , and E N , at the B, C, and N sites, respectively. Following the work of Yoshioka et al., we shall assume that the hopping integrals are constant regardless of the atoms, i.e., ti,j ≡ t, and E N  = −EB and E C  = 0[25]. For the numerical calculations, we shall choose EB/t = 0.7, 1.0 and 1.3[24, 25].

Results and discussion

First, we shall discuss the stability of BC2N nanoribbons. Calculated formation energies of BC2N nanoribbons are summarized in Table1. Here, the formation energy is defined as
E form = E BC 2 N N E Gr N E BN 2 E H 2 ,
(2)
Table 1

Calculated formation energies of BC 2 N nanoribbons for N=8

Model

A

B

C

D

Eform (eV)

17.173

17.629

15.446

16.532

where E BC 2 N , EGr, EBN, and E H 2 are total energies of BC2N nanoribbons, graphene, boron nitride sheet, and hydrogen molecules, respectively. The model C and D BC2N nanoribbons are stable compared with models A and B due to the large number of C-C and B-N bonds. Previously, we considered the BCN nanoribbons where the outermost C atoms were replaced with B and N atoms. In these nanoribbons, H atoms tend to be adsorbed at B atoms[26]. For the model C and D BC2N nanoribbons, however, a termination of the outermost B atoms is not energetically favorable compared with a termination of the outermost N atoms. Similar behavior can be found for the zigzag and armchair BN nanoribbons[27]. The outermost B (N) atoms are connected with single N (B) atoms for the model C and D BC2N nanoribbons, while the outermost B and N atoms are connected with only C atoms for the previous models’ nanoribbons. Such difference between atomic arrangement should lead different tendency on the enegetics.

The calculated band structures of BC2N nanoribbons for N = 8 are summarized in Figure2. The band structure of the model A nanoribbon within DFT shown in Figure2a(image i) have nearly degenerate band around the Fermi level. In Figure2a(images ii, iii, and iv), the band structures of the model A nanoribbons within TB model are shown. We observed that the flat bands and the degree of degeneracy depend on EB/t[24]. The band structure for EB/t = 0.7 has the doubly degenerate flat bands at E = 0, but the twofold degeneracy was lifted with increasing EB[24]. The band structure within DFT resembles to that within TB for EB/t = 1.3 shown in Figure2a(image iv). The length of the flat bands increase with increasing of EB, since the shift of the Dirac point of BC2N sheet increases[24].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-341/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1684_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

The band structures of BC 2 N nanoribbons of the models A (a), B (b), C (c), and D (d) for N= 8. In each panel, the result within DFT is shown in (i) and those within TB model are shown in (ii, iii, iv). Note that the center of the energy, E = 0, does not mean the Fermi level in models C and D within TB model. In (c - iv) and (d - iv), the improved band structures by adding the extra site energies at the outermost atoms are indicated by the blue dotted lines.

The band structures of the model B nanoribbons also show similar dependence. It should be emphasized that the atoms are arrange as B-C-N-C along the zigzag lines in the model A and B nanoribbons[24]. As reported before[24], we can expect that the bands around the Fermi level would degenerate with increasing of N.

In the model C nanoribbons, the band structure within DFT shows the flat bands around the Fermi level, but they are not degenerate. It should be noted that electron-hole symmetry is broken in the model C nanoribbons and atoms are not arranged as B-C-N-C along the zigzag lines. On the other hand, the band structures within TB model do not have the flat bands at E = 0. While such prominent bands are not described well, we can see the correspondence between the result within DFT and that of TB model for EB/t = 1.3. Due to the relation E N  = −EB, the positive energy states of the model C becomes negative in model D, vice versa. Therefore, we can find similar effect to model C in the band structures, i.e., the band structure within TB model of EB/t = 1.3 is similar to that of DFT except around the Fermi level.

We tried to describe the band structure of models C and D using TB model by introducing the extra site energies at the edges. In this study, we added EB/2 at the outermost N atoms for the model C nanoribbon and −EB/2 at the outermost B atoms for the model D nanoribbon, because such prescription found to show the relatively good performance. The results for EB/t = 1.3 are shown in Figure2c(image iv), d(image iv) by the blue dotted lines. The energy bands around E = 0 in the vicinity of the Γ are shifted upward (downward) by the prescriptions for model C (D), showing that the band structures became much similar to those within DFT.

Previously, Xu et al. reported the band structure within DFT calculations of BC2N nanoribbons where the atoms are arranged as C-B-N-C in the transverse direction, as shown in Figure3a[22]. We shall call these nanoribbons as model E. They obtained the linear dispersion crossing at the Fermi level, as shown in Figure3b(image i), while the band structure is a semiconducting within TB model, as shown in the red curves of Figure3b(image ii). In this case, we added EB/2 (−EB/2) for the outermost C atoms connected with B (N) atoms. As the results, we could produce the linear dispersion for these nanoribbons as indicated in the blue dashed curves in Figure3b(image ii). It should be emphasized that all the improved cases have the edge character. Therefore, this prescription works well if the target band keeps the edge character.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-341/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1684_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Model E BC 2 N nanoribbon.(a) Schematic illustration of model E BC2N nanoribbon. (b) Calculated band structure of model E BC2N nanoribbon shown in (a) within DFT (i) and TB model for EB/t = 1.3 (ii).

The prescription does not work for several BC2N nanoribbons. As an example, we shall consider the BC2N nanoribbon shown in Figure4a, which was introducedin[20] as BB-CC model. Here, we shall call the nanoribbons as model F. The model F nanoribbon is made of the other BC2N sheet of the model II defined in[17]. Note that the size of unit cell of this nanoribbon is different from those discussed above and the atoms are not arranged as B-C-N-C along zigzag lines in the model F nanoribbons.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-341/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1684_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Model F BC 2 N nanoribbon.(a) Schematic illustration of model-F BC2N nanoribbon. (b) Calculated band structure of model F BC2N nanoribbon shown in (a) within DFT (i) and TB model for EB/t = 1.3 (ii).

Calculated band structures are presented in Figure4b. As shown in Figure4b(image ii), the band structure within TB model for EB/t = 1.3 have a finite bandgap which does not decrease with increasing of the ribbon width. On the other hand, the band structure within DFT has a tiny direct bandgap of 0.12 eV at the X point. The decrease of band gap was reported by Lu et al.[20]. It should be noted that we confirmed that the band structure was not improved even if we introduce the site energies at the outermost atoms. Therefore, the arrangement of B-C-N-C along zigzag lines plays a decisive role for the applicability of TB model for BC2N nanoribbons.

For the zigzag nanoribbons with unit cell being a single primitive cell, the energy at the X point, i.e., k = ±π, can be solved analytically. Since the matrix elements along the zigzag lines are proportional to −t e±i k/2, the hopping along the zigzag lines vanishes at k = ±π (Figure5), and the nanoribbons are effectively disconnected as indicated by the shaded region in the right side of Figure4. Let E a and EB be the site energies at a and b sites shown in Figure4. In this case, the energies at k = ±π are given by
E = E a + E b ± ( E a E b ) 2 + 4 t 2 2 .
(3)
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-341/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1684_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Schematic illustration of effective decoupling at k=± π in zigzag nanoribbons. Since the hopping integral along the zigzag lines are given by −t e±i k/2, the nanoribbons are effectively disconnected as indicated by shaded regions in the right side of figure.

Therefore, the energy bands concentrate on these values at k = ±π except edge sites, suggesting that the introduction of the edge site energy is not sufficient to improve the description of electronic properties of BC2N nanoribbons within TB model.

In the model F nanoribbons, the degeneracy at k = π within TB model is lifted in the band structure within DFT. The BC2N nanoribbons where atoms are arranged as C-B-N-C in the transverse direction do not have such degeneracies. These results indicate that the effect of charge transfer penetrates into interior of nanoribbons, resulting in a formation of transverse gradient of electrostatic potential. In the model C and D nanoribbons, on the other hand, the edge dominant states could not be described within TB calculations. For these nanoribbons, the direction of B-N bonds should play important role. In the BC2N sheet shown in Figure1, the direction of BN dimers is arranged alternately. Then, the formation of transverse gradient of electrostatic potential in the nanoribbons is suppressed due to alternate arrangement of BN dimers in slant angle.

Previously, the authors reported that the arrangement of B-C-N-C along zigzag lines plays a decisive role for the formation of the edge states in zigzag BC2Nnanoribbons[24]. This arrangement has other meaning. Within the TB approximation, effect of charge transfer is not described. On the other hand, B (N) atoms act as acceptors (donors) in graphene. Since B and N atoms occupy the same sublattice sites, the effect of charge transfer is canceled when the atoms are arranged as B-C-N-C along zigzag lines. Therefore, TB model is applicable for the zigzag BC2N nanoribbons when the atoms are arranged as B-C-N-C along zigzag lines.

Conclusions

The electronic properties of BC2N nanoribbons with zigzag edges have been studied theoretically using the tight binding model and the first-principles calculations. When atoms are arranged as B-C-N-C along the zigzag lines, the zigzag BC2N nanoribbons have the flat bands. Then, the tight binding model can become applicable for these systems. In this arrangement, the charge transfer is averaged effectively since B and N atoms are substituted in same sublattice sites, and such effect plays an important role for the formation of the edge states. For the tight binding model, the ratio of the site energies of B atom to the hopping integral is larger than unity. We tried to describe the band structure of BC2N nanoribbons where the atoms are not arranged as B-C-N-C along the zigzag lines using the tight binding model by introducing the extra site energies at the outermost atoms, but such method does not work for some BC2N nanoribbons. Therefore, study on the electronic properties of BC2N nanoribbons should be done within the first-principles calculations.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge H. Imamura, Y. Shimoi, H. Arai, H. Tsukahara, K. Wakabayashi, and S. Dutta for valuable discussions. This research was supported by the International Joint Work Program of Daeduck Innopolis under the Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) of the Korean Government.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nanosystem Research Institute, AIST
(2)
Computational Material Science Unit, NIMS

References

  1. Fujita M, Wakabayashi K, Nakada K, Kusakabe K: Peculiar localized state at zigzag graphite edge. J Phys Soc Jpn 1996, 65: 1920. 10.1143/JPSJ.65.1920View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Nakada K, Fujita M, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS: Edge state in graphene ribbons: nanometer size effect and edge shape dependence. Phys Rev B 1996, 54: 17954. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.17954View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Weng-Sieh Z, Cherry K, Chopra NG, Blase X, Miyamoto Y, Rubio A, Cohen ML, Zettl A, Gronsky R: Synthesis of BxCyNz nanotubules. Phys Rev B 1995, 51: 11229. 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.11229View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Redlich P, Leoffler J, Ajayan PM, Bill J, Aldinger F, Rühle M: B-C-N nanotubes and boron doping of carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 1996, 260: 2465.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sen R, Satishkumar BC, Govindaraj A, Harikumar KR, Raina G, Zhang JP, Cheetham AK, Rao CNR: B-C-N, C-N and B-N nanotubes produced by the pyrolysis of precursor molecules over Co catalysts. Chem Phys Lett 1998, 287: 671. 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00220-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yu J, Bai XD, Ahn J, Yoon SF, Wang EG: Highly oriented rich boron B-C-N nanotubes by bias-assisted hot filament chemical vapor deposition. Chem Phys Lett 2000, 323: 529. 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00546-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yu MF, Kawalewski T, Ruoff RS: Investigation of the radial deformability of individual carbon nanotubes under controlled indentation force. Phys Rev Lett 2000, 85: 1456. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1456View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ci L, Song L, Jin C, Jariwala D, Wu D, Li Y, Srivastava A, Wang ZF, Storr K, Balicas L, Liu F, Ajayan PM: Atomic layers of hybridized boron nitride and graphene domains. Nature Mat 2010, 9: 430. 10.1038/nmat2711View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu Z, et al.: In-plane heterostructures of graphene and hexagonal boron nitride with controlled domain sizes. Nat Nanothech 2013, 8: 119. 10.1038/nnano.2012.256View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Nakamura J, Nitta T, Natori A: Electronic and magnetic properties of BNC ribbons. Phys Rev B 2005, 72: 205429.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. He J, Chen KQ, Fan ZQ, Tang LM, Hu WP: Transition from insulator to metal induced by hybridized connection of graphene and boron nitride nanoribbons. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 97: 193305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Basheer EA, Parida P, Pati SK: Electronic and magnetic properties of BNC nanoribbons: a detailed computational study. New J Phys 2011, 13: 053008. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/053008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kan EJ, Wu X, Li Z, Zeng XC, Yang J, Hou JG: Half-metallicity in hybrid BCN nanoribbons. J Chem Phys 2008, 129: 084712. 10.1063/1.2971187View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu Z, Pan Y, Li Z, Yang Z: d0 magnetism and large magnetoelectric effect in BC4N nanoribbons. J Appl Phys 2013, 113: 133705. 10.1063/1.4799115View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kouvetakis J, Sasaki T, Shen C, Hagiwara R, Lemer M, Krishnan KM, Bartlett N: Novel aspects of graphite intercalation by fluorine and fluorides and new B/C, C/N and B/C/N materials based on the graphite network. Synth Met 1989, 34: 1. 10.1016/0379-6779(89)90355-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Sasaki T, Akaishi M, Yamaoka S, Hujiki Y, Oikawa T: Simultaneous crystallization of diamond and cubic boron nitride from the graphite relative BC2N under high pressure/high temperature conditions. Chem Mater 1993, 695: 5.Google Scholar
  17. Liu AY, Wentzcovitch RM, Cohen ML: Atomic arrangement and electronic structure of BC2N. Phys Rev B 1989, 39: 1760. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.1760View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nozaki H, Itoh S: Structural stability of BC2N. J Phys Chem Solids 1996, 57: 41. 10.1016/0022-3697(95)00088-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Azevedo S: Energetic and electronic structure of BC2N compounds. Eur Phys J B 2005, 44: 203. 10.1140/epjb/e2005-00115-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu P, Zhang Z, Guo W: Electronic structures of BC2N nanoribbons. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 3572. 10.1021/jp110217tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu P, Zhang Z, Guo W: Magnetism in armchair BC2N nanoribbons. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 133103. 10.1063/1.3367828View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Xu B, Yin J, Weng H, Xia Y, Wan X, Liu Z: Robust Dirac point in honeycomb-structure nanoribbons with zigzag edges. Phys Rev B 2010, 81: 205419.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lai L, Lu J: Half metallicity in BC2N nanoribbons: stability, electronic structures, and magnetism. Nanoscale 2011, 3: 2583. 10.1039/c1nr10177cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaneko T, Harigaya K: Dependence of atomic arrangement on length of flat bands in zigzag BC2N nanoribbons. J Phys Soc Jpn 2013, 82: 044708. 10.7566/JPSJ.82.044708View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Yoshioka T, Suzuura H, Ando T: Electronic states of BCN alloy nanotubes in a simple tight-binding model. J Phys Soc Jpn 2003, 72: 2656. 10.1143/JPSJ.72.2656View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaneko T, Harigaya K, Imamura H: Appearance of flat bands and edge states in boron-carbon-nitride nanoribbons. J Phys Soc Jpn 2013, 82: 083710. 10.7566/JPSJ.82.083710View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zheng FL, Zhang Y, Zhang JM, Xu KW: Effect of the dangling bond on the electronic and magnetic properties of BN nanoribbon. J Chem Phys Sol 2011, 72: 256. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2011.01.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Harigaya and Kaneko; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.