Open Access

Dirac fermion heating, current scaling, and direct insulator-quantum Hall transition in multilayer epitaxial graphene

  • Fan-Hung Liu1,
  • Chang-Shun Hsu1,
  • Chiashain Chuang2,
  • Tak-Pong Woo2,
  • Lung-I Huang2,
  • Shun-Tsung Lo1,
  • Yasuhiro Fukuyama3,
  • Yanfei Yang4,
  • Randolph E Elmquist4 and
  • Chi-Te Liang1, 2Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20138:360

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-360

Received: 2 July 2013

Accepted: 12 August 2013

Published: 22 August 2013


We have performed magnetotransport measurements on multilayer epitaxial graphene. By increasing the driving current I through our graphene devices while keeping the bath temperature fixed, we are able to study Dirac fermion heating and current scaling in such devices. Using zero-field resistivity as a self thermometer, we are able to determine the effective Dirac fermion temperature (TDF) at various driving currents. At zero field, it is found that TDF I≈1/2. Such results are consistent with electron heating in conventional two-dimensional systems in the plateau-plateau transition regime. With increasing magnetic field B, we observe an I-independent point in the measured longitudinal resistivity ρxx which is equivalent to the direct insulator-quantum Hall (I-QH) transition characterized by a temperature-independent point in ρxx. Together with recent experimental evidence for direct I-QH transition, our new data suggest that such a transition is a universal effect in graphene, albeit further studies are required to obtain a thorough understanding of such an effect.


Graphene Magnetoresistivity measurements Direct insulator-quantum Hall transition


Graphene, which is an ideal two-dimensional (2D) system, has been attracting worldwide interest since its discovery in 2004 [1]. While the sizes of mechanically exfoliated graphene are limited, its ultrahigh quality allows one to observe fascinating physical phenomena such as ambipolar characteristics [1], anomalous integer quantum Hall steps [1], Berry's phase [2, 3], and fractional quantum Hall effect [46]. On the other hand, graphene prepared by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and epitaxial graphene can be used for potential device applications because the sizes of these systems should allow realization of wafer-scale integrated circuits based on graphene [7].

When a charge system is appreciably heated by a driving current, the equilibrium between the phonons and the charges collapses. In this situation, effective charge temperature (T c ) can be substantially higher than lattice temperature (T L ) [8]. This interesting physical phenomenon is normally called the charge heating effect. In some cases, there exists a simple effective charge temperature-current relation T c I α , where α is an exponent that depends on charge-phonon scattering [8]. It is now well established that the two-bath model can be used to describe charge heating and charge energy loss rate by charge-phonon scattering [8]. The charge heating effect has become increasingly important as device dimensions are reduced and charge mobility is increased [9]. In particular, Dirac fermion heating in graphene is an important physical phenomenon since it affects thermal dissipation and heat management in modern electronics [10] and low-temperature applications such as quantum resistance metrology [11].

Insulator-quantum Hall (I-QH) transition [1215] is an interesting physical phenomenon in the field of 2D physics. Especially, a direct transition from an insulator to a high Landau level filling factor ν ≥ 3 QH state which is normally described as the direct I-QH transition continues to attract interest [1618]. Very recently, experimental evidence for direct I-QH transition in epitaxial monolayer graphene [19] and in mechanically exfoliated multilayer graphene [20] has been reported. In order to further study direct I-QH transition in the graphene-based system, one may wish to investigate Dirac fermion heating in graphene. Moreover, it is a fundamental issue to see if a current-independent point in the longitudinal resistivity when the bath temperature is fixed exists since such a point should be equivalent to the direct I-QH transition. Furthermore, one could probe current scaling on both sides of the direct I-QH transition to further study Dirac fermion-phonon scattering as well as Dirac fermion-Dirac fermion scattering, both of which are very fundamental physical phenomena.

In this paper, we report magnetotransport measurements on multilayer epitaxial graphene of few layers obtained under conditions which favor controlled growth at high temperatures [21]. Dirac fermion heating in the high current limit is studied. It is found that in the low magnetic field regime, the effective Dirac fermion temperature obeys a simple power law TDF I≈0.5. Such results suggest that the Dirac fermion-phonon scattering rate 1/τDFP ~ T2, consistent with those in conventional 2D electron systems. With increasing magnetic field, interestingly, a current-independent point in the longitudinal resistivity is observed. It was demonstrated that such a point corresponds to the direct I-QH transition characterized by a T-independent point in ρxx. This result is further supported by the vastly different I dependences for both sides of the I-QH transition. Our new experimental results, together with recent experimental results [19, 20], indicate that direct I-QH transition is a universal effect in graphene. We suggest that further experimental and theoretical studies are required to obtain a complete picture for direct I-QH transition in graphene-based devices.


A controlled sublimation method was used for graphene growth on a 6H-SiC (0001) surface [16]. First, the SiC substrate was cleaned using a standard procedure for substrate cleaning [21]. Second, the optically polished Si-face surface was placed face-to-face with a polished graphite disk (FTG) and arranged such that uniform Newton rings were observed in fluorescent light [21]. The optically finished substrate surfaces resulted in a higher rate of SiC decomposition compared to chemical–mechanical processed (CMP) surfaces and created multiple graphene layers.

The epitaxial growth process was controlled by annealing in a sequence of temperature ramp and dwell stages in Ar background gas at a pressure slightly higher than 1 atm using a commercial furnace. The substrates were first dehydrated and cleaned in the furnace at 725°C for approximately 16 h. The temperature was ramped to 1,200°C for 30 min and then ramped at 100°C/min for graphene growth at a temperature (dwell time) of 1,850°C (45 min; samples 1 and 2) or 1,950°C (30 min; samples 3 and 4). The temperatures were measured and controlled using molybdenum-sheathed type ‘C’ thermocouples.

When the samples were taken out of the furnace, they were imaged by tapping-mode atomic force microscopy (AFM). They were then shipped from NIST to National Taiwan University, where they were patterning into Hall bars by standard photolithography using reactive ion etch in O2 plasma (see Figure 1 with size ratio L/W = 4). The pleats on the surface show that multilayer graphene was grown over most of the 6H-SiC (0001) surface [22]. Optically polished substrates produce much thicker graphene for the same processing conditions compared to that grown on CMP surfaces. The roughness of the optically polished surface provides much more off-axis surface area, relative to the (0001) atomic plane, and this accounts for the faster growth rate. The TEM images are taken from samples grown under the same conditions. Comparing the AFM images with TEM imaging performed on other samples, we would estimate that the 1,850°C samples have four to five layers of graphene and the 1,950°C samples have five to six layers. All four-terminal electrical measurements were carried out using dc constant-current sources and multimeters.
Figure 1

Optical microscopy image of Hall bar shows L = 100 and W = 25 μm. The green lines indicate the edges of the Hall bar.

Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows the magnetoresistivity measurements ρxx (B) at various temperatures. Negative magnetoresistivity centered at B = 0 can be ascribed to suppression of weak localization by a magnetic field applied perpendicular to the graphene plane. The weak localization effect in graphene is interesting as, initially, it was suggested that weak localization is strongly suppressed in exfoliated graphene flakes while normally pronounced positive magnetoresistivity centered at B = 0 is observed [23]. Later it was shown that the weak localization effect depends strongly on the chirality of the graphene system [24]. In epitaxial graphene, pronounced negative magnetoresistivity is often observed, allowing studies of weak localization in graphene-based systems [25]. As shown in Figure 2, the observed negative magnetoresistivity becomes less pronounced with increasing temperature.
Figure 2

The magnetoresistivity measurements ρ xx (B) at different temperatures T. From top to bottom: T = 1.93, 1.98, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, and 21 K.

Figure 3 shows the magnetoresistivity measurements ρxx (B) at various driving currents with the lattice temperature at ≈2 K. The negative magnetoresistivity observed centered at zero field shows a strong dependence on current and is suppressed at higher currents. We suggest that increasing the measurement temperature in the low current limit is equivalent to increasing the current while keeping the lattice temperature constant at approximately ≈2 K. These results can be ascribed to Dirac fermion heating in which the equilibrium between the phonons and Dirac fermion collapses. Using the zero-field resistivity of our device as a self thermometer, we are able to determine the effective Dirac fermion temperature at various driving currents. Such results are shown in Figure 4. In the low current limit, TDF is approximately I-independent, suggesting that the lattice temperature is equal to TDF. In the high current limit, TDF I≈0.52. The measured exponent in the TDF-I relation is close to one half. Such a result is consistent with heating effects observed in various 2D systems in the plateau-plateau transition regime [26, 27]. Here we follow the seminal work of Scherer and co-workers [26]. The inelastic scattering length can be given by
l in T p 2
where p is the exponent related to inelastic scattering. The effective electron temperature is given by the energy acquired by the electron diffusing along the distance lin in the electric field E. Therefore,
k B T e eE l in
Figure 3

Magnetoresistivity measurements ρ xx (B) at driving currents I. The lattice temperature is constantly fixed at T ≈ 1.9 K. From top to bottom: I = 2, 3, 5, 7, 8.5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 70, 85, 100, 125, 150, 200, and 225 μA, respectively.
Figure 4

Effective Dirac fermion temperature T DF versus driving current I on a log- log scale. The red line corresponds to the best fit in the high-current regime. The exponent in the TDF-I relation is given as α = 0.52 ± 0.01. The error stems from interpolation of the magnetoresistivity data.

Upon inserting Equation 2 and E ~ J ~ I, we have
T e I 2 2 + p

If p = 2 [10, 25], then the exponent in the temperature-scaling relation is 0.5 [21, 2628] which is consistent with our experimental results obtained on Dirac fermions. We note that our experimental results are equivalent to a T4 dependence of energy loss rate for Dirac fermions as calculated [29] and observed in epitaxial, CVD-grown and exfoliated graphene [10, 30]. It is worth pointing out that previous results are obtained in the plateau-plateau transition regime [26, 27, 31] and Shubnikov-de Haas region [10], which is in contrast with our case in the weak insulating regime where Landau quantization is not significant. Nevertheless, our data indeed indicate such a universal exponent at approximately 0.5 for heating in various 2D systems. Moreover, our results suggest that the Dirac fermion-phonon scattering rate 1/τDFP is proportional to T2. It is worth noting that enhanced mobility can be achieved in semiconductor quantum wires [32] and in semiconducting graphene nanoribbons [33] by a high dc electric field. Such interesting results are highly desirable for practical applications in narrow graphene devices in the high current limit.

In order to further study the observed Dirac fermion heating effects, we have extended our measurements to higher magnetic fields. Such results are shown in Figure 5. Interestingly, a current-independent point in ρxx is observed. The observed fixed point is reminiscent of the I-QH transition in graphene [19, 20]. In order to confirm this interpretation, as shown in Figure 6, we perform magnetoresistivity measurements ρxx (B) at various temperatures in the low current limit to ensure thermal equilibrium between phonons and Dirac fermions. The same crossing point in ρxx at Bc ≈ 9.2 T is indeed observed. For B < Bc, the resistivity decreases with increasing temperature, as is characteristic of an insulator [17]. For B > Bc, the resistivity increases with increasing temperature, showing a QH conductor behavior [17]. In the high magnetic field regime, some weak oscillatory features can be ascribed to Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations in disordered graphene. However, their amplitudes are weak; therefore, it is not possible to extract important physical quantities such as the quantum mobility and effective mass in our system. The Landau level filling factor at the crossing point is estimated to be ≈94. Therefore, we have observed compelling evidence for the direct I-QH in disordered epitaxial graphene. Using the measured ρxx as a thermometer for Dirac fermions, we are able to determine TDF and the exponent in the TDF-I relation at different magnetic fields as shown in Figure 7. Close to Bc, the temperature dependence of ρxx is so weak that reliable determination of TDF cannot be obtained. We note that in the insulating regime B < Bc, the exponent is again close to one half, consistent with the results at B = 0. In the QH-like regime, the exponent is about 0.15 which is significantly smaller than one half. Such vastly different exponents observed in the two regimes provide further experimental evidence for the direct I-QH transition in disordered epitaxial graphene. We note that defining physically an effective temperature for non-thermal-equilibrium electrons is non-trivial [34], which is not always a scaling relation based on a linear response theory for perturbative thermal-equilibrium states. Therefore, further studies are required for a better understanding of our results.
Figure 5

Magnetoresistivity measurements ρ xx (B) at various driving currents I. The lattice temperature is constantly fixed at T ≈ 2 K.
Figure 6

The magnetoresistivity measurements ρ xx (B) at different T for sample 1. The inset shows the Hall measurements ρxy (B) at different T for sample 1.
Figure 7

The determined exponent α in the power law T DF I α versus magnetic field B.

In studying multilayer epitaxial graphene, top gating is difficult since depositing a dielectric layer is difficult and the top layers would screen the electric fields. Back gating is impractical because it would require SiC substrate thinning. Therefore, in order to further study the observed direct I-QH transition, we choose to study various samples with different classical mobilities (see Additional file 1). In all cases, an approximately T-independent point in ρxx is observed. The approximated T-independent Hall results suggest that Dirac fermion-Dirac fermion interactions are not significant in all our devices [3538]. The crossing point and some other physical quantities are listed in Table 1. We note that for the same numbers of layer, the crossing field Bc is lower when the mobility μ is higher, consistent with the results obtained in conventional GaAs-based 2D systems [39, 40]. Moreover, the spin degree of freedom does not play an important role in the observed direct I-QH transition [4145]. The dependence of the crossing magnetic field on the number of layers and sample does not seem to show a trend and thus requires further studies.
Table 1

Sample parameters


Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

Sample 4

ρ (Ω)





n (1013 cm−2)





μ (cm2/V.S)





Bc (T)





v c





ρxx/ρxy at Bc





μB c





Samples 1 and 2 were from the same chip, processed at 1,850°C for 45 min; the former is close to the edge, and the later is near the center. Samples 3 and 4 were also from the same chip, processed at 1,950°C for 30 min; the former is close to the center, and the latter is near the edge. Lower resistivity near the edge is expected in the FTG process; near the center the graphene growth is suppressed because of the higher concentration of Si vapor.

At the crossing fields, the corresponding Landau filling factors are much larger than 2. Therefore, we have observed direct I-QH transition in all our devices [1720]. It was argued that for direct I-QH transition in conventional semiconductor-based 2D systems, near the crossing field, ρxx is approximately ρxy, and the product of μBc is close to 1 [46]. However, in all our devices, ρxx/ρxy is much greater than 1, and μBc is always smaller than 1. Therefore, our data suggest that further studies are required to obtain a thorough understanding of the direct I-QH transition not only in conventional 2D systems but also in disordered graphene. The observation of a current-independent point in ρxx which corresponds to its temperature-independent counterpart suggests that applying a high current is equivalent to heating up the graphene lattice.


In conclusion, we have presented magnetoresistivity measurements on multilayer epitaxial graphene. It is found that a relation between the effective Dirac fermion temperature and the driving current can be given by TDF I≈0.5 in the low magnetic field regime. With increasing magnetic field, an I-independent point in ρxx is observed which is equivalent to its T-independent counterpart in the low current limit. Evidence for direct I-QH transition has been reported in four different graphene samples. Near the crossing field where the longitudinal resistivity is approximately T-independent, ρxx is at least two times larger than ρxy. Moreover, the product of Drude mobility and Bc is smaller than 1. We suggest that further studies are required to obtain a complete understanding of direct I-QH transition in disordered graphene.



This work was funded by the National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan and National Taiwan University (grant number 102R7552-2).

Authors’ Affiliations

Graduate Institute of Applied Physics, National Taiwan University
Department of Physics, National Taiwan University
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)


  1. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA: Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306: 666. 10.1126/science.1102896View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang Y, Tan Y-W, Stormer HL, Kim P: Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 2005, 438: 201. 10.1038/nature04235View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Katsnelson MI, Grigorieva IV, Dubonos SV, Firsov AA: Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 2005, 438: 197. 10.1038/nature04233View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolotin KI, Ghahari F, Shulman MD, Stormer HL, Kim P: Observation of the fractional quantum Hall effect in graphene. Nature 2009, 462: 196. 10.1038/nature08582View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Du X, Skachko I, Duerr F, Luican A, Andrei EY: Fractional quantum Hall effect and insulating phase of Dirac electrons in graphene. Nature 2009, 462: 192. 10.1038/nature08522View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Feldman BE, Krauss B, Smet JH, Yacoby A: Unconventional sequence of fractional quantum Hall states in suspended graphene. Science 2012, 337: 1196. 10.1126/science.1224784View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin Y-M, Valdes-Garcia A, Han S-J, Farmer DB, Meric I, Sun Y, Wu Y, Dimitrakopoulos C, Grill A, Avouris P, Jenkins KA: Wafer-scale graphene integrated circuit. Science 2011, 332: 1294. 10.1126/science.1204428View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wennberg AKM, Ytterboe SN, Gould CM, Bozler HM, Klem J, Morkoc H: Electron heating in a multiple-quantum-well structure below 1 K. Phys Rev B 1986, 34: 4409. 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.4409View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Appleyard NJ, Nicholls JT, Simmons MY, Tribe WR, Pepper M: Thermometer for the 2D electron gas using 1D thermopower. Phys Rev Lett 1998, 81: 3491. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3491View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Baker AMR, Alexander-Webber JA, Altebaeumer T, McMullan SD, Janssen TJBM, Tzalenchuk A, Lara-Avila S, Kubatkin S, Yakimova R, Lin C-T, Li L-J, Nicholas RJ: Energy loss rates of hot Dirac fermions in epitaxial, exfoliated, and CVD graphene. Phys Rev B 2013, 87: 045414.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tzalenchuk A, Lara-Avila S, Kalaboukhov A, Paolillo S, Syvajarvi M, Yakimova R, Kazakova O, Janssen TJBM, Fal’ko V, Kubatkin S: Towards a quantum resistance standard based on epitaxial graphene. Nat Nanotechnol 2010, 5: 186. 10.1038/nnano.2009.474View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kivelson S, Lee D-H, Zhang S-C: Global phase diagram in the quantum Hall effect. Phys Rev B 1992, 46: 2223. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.2223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang HW, Johnson CE, Wang KL, Hannah ST: Observation of magnetic-field-induced delocalization: transition from Anderson insulator to quantum Hall conductor. Phys Rev Lett 1993, 71: 1439. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1439View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hughes RJF, Nicholls JT, Frost JEF, Linfield EH, Pepper M, Ford CJB, Ritchie DA, Jones GAC, Kogan E, Kaveh M: Magnetic-field-induced insulator-quantum Hall-insulator transition in a disordered two-dimensional electron gas. J Phys Condens Matter 1994, 6: 4763. 10.1088/0953-8984/6/25/014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang T, Clark KP, Spencer GF, Mack AM, Kirk WP: Magnetic-field-induced metal-insulator transition in two dimensions. Phys Rev Lett 1994, 72: 709. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.709View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee CH, Chang YH, Suen YW, Lin HH: Magnetic-field-induced delocalization in center-doped GaAs/Al x Ga1- x As multiple quantum wells. Phys Rev B 1998, 58: 10629. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.10629View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Song S-H, Shahar D, Tsui DC, Xie YH, Monroe D: New Universality at the magnetic field driven insulator to integer quantum Hall effect transitions. Phys Rev Lett 1997, 78: 2200. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Liang C-T, Lin L-H, Chen KY, Lo S-T, Wang Y-T, Lou D-S, Kim G-H, Chang Y-H, Ochiai Y, Aoki N, Chen J-C, Lin Y, Huang C-F, Lin S-D, Ritchie DA: On the direct insulator-quantum Hall transition in two-dimensional electron systems in the vicinity of nanoscaled scatterers. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 131. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-131View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pallecchi E, Ridene M, Kazazis D, Lafont F, Schopfer F, Poirier W, Goerbig MO, Mailly D, Ouerghi A: Insulating to relativistic quantum Hall transition in disordered graphene. Sci Rep 2013, 3: 1791.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chuang C, Lin L-H, Aoki N, Ouchi T, Mahjoub AM, Woo T-P, Bird JP, Ochiai Y, Lo S-T, Liang C-T: Experimental evidence for direct insulator-quantum Hall transition in multi-layer graphene. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 214. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-214View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Real MA, Lass EA, Liu F-H, Shen T, Jones GR, Soons JA, Newell DB, Davydov AV, Elmquist RE: Graphene epitaxial growth on SiC(0001) for resistance standards. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2013, 62: 1454.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. de Heer WA, Berger C, Ruan M, Sprinkle M, Li X, Hu Y, Zhang B, Hankinson J, Conrad E: Large area and structured epitaxial graphene produced by confinement controlled sublimation of silicon carbide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108: 16900. 10.1073/pnas.1105113108View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Morozov SV, Novoselov KS, Katsnelson MI, Schedin F, Ponomarenko LA, Jiang D, Geim AK: Strong suppression of weak localization in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97: 016801.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. McCann E, Kechedzhi K, Fal’ko VI, Suzuura H, Ando T, Altshuler BL: Weak-localization magnetoresistance and valley symmetry in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97: 146805.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lara-Avila S, Tzalenchuk A, Kubatkin S, Yakimova R, Janssen TJBM, Cedergren K, Bergsten T, Fal’ko V: Disordered Fermi liquid in epitaxial graphene from quantum transport measurements. Phys Rev Lett 2011, 107: 166602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Scherer H, Schweitzer L, Ahlers FJ, Bliek L, Losch R, Schlapp W: Current scaling and electron heating between integer quantum Hall plateaus in GaAs/Al x Gal−xAs heterostructures. Semicond Sci Technol 1995, 10: 959. 10.1088/0268-1242/10/7/010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wei HP, Engel LW, Tsui DC: Current scaling in the integer quantum Hall effect. Phys Rev B 1994, 50: 14609. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.14609View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Brandes T, Schweitzer L, Kramer B: Multifractal wave functions and inelastic scattering in the integer quantum Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett 1994, 72: 3582. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3582View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kubakaddi SS: Interaction of massless Dirac electrons with acoustic phonons in graphene at low temperatures. Phys Rev B 2009, 79: 075417.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Betz AC, Vialla F, Brunel D, Voisin C, Picher M, Cavanna A, Madouri A, Feve G, Berroir J-M, Placais B, Pallecchi E: Hot electron cooling by acoustic phonons in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 2012, 109: 056805.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Koch S, Haug RJ, von Klitzing K, Ploog K: Variable range hopping transport in the tails of the conductivity peaks between quantum Hall plateaus. Semicond Sci Technol 1995, 10: 209. 10.1088/0268-1242/10/2/015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang D, Gumbs G: Comparison of inelastic and quasielastic scattering effects on nonlinear electron transport in quantum wires. J Appl Phys 2010, 107: 103710. 10.1063/1.3373413View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang D, Gumbs G, Roslyak O: Field-enhanced electron mobility by nonlinear phonon scattering of Dirac electrons in semiconducting graphene nanoribbons. Phys Rev B 2011, 83: 115405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Huang D, Lyo SK, Gumbs G: Bloch oscillation, dynamical localization, and optical probing of electron gases in quantum-dot superlattices in high electric fields. Phys Rev B 2009, 79: 155308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Lo S-T, Wang Y-T, Bohra G, Comfort E, Lin T-Y, Kang M-G, Strasser G, Bird JP, Huang CF, Lin L-H, Chen JC, Liang C-T: Insulator, semiclassical oscillations, and quantum Hall liquids at low magnetic fields. J Phys Condens Matter 2012, 24: 405601. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/40/405601View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin S-K, Wu KT, Huang CP, Liang C-T, Chang YH, Chen YF, Chang PH, Chen NC, Chang CA, Peng HC, Shih CF, Liu KS, Lin TY: Electron transport in In-rich In x Ga1−xN films. J Appl Phys 2005, 97: 046101. 10.1063/1.1847694View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Renard VT, Gornyi IV, Tkachenko OA, Tkachenko VA, Kvon ZD, Olshanetsky EB, Toropov AI, Portal J-C: Quantum corrections to the conductivity and Hall coefficient of a two-dimensional electron gas in a dirty Al x Ga1−xAs/GaAs/Al x Ga1−xAs quantum well: from the diffusive to the ballistic regime. Phys Rev B 2005, 72: 075313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Chen JH, Lin JY, Tsai JK, Park H, Kim G-H, Youn D, Cho HI, Lee EJ, Lee JH, Liang C-T, Chen YF: Experimental evidence for Drude-Boltzmann-like transport in a two-dimensional electron gas in an AlGaN/GaN heterostructure. J Korean Phys Soc 2006, 48: 1539.Google Scholar
  39. Huang CF, Chang YH, Lee CH, Chuo HT, Yeh HD, Liang CT, Lin HH, Cheng HH, Hwang GJ: Insulator-quantum Hall conductor transitions at low magnetic field. Phys Rev B 2002, 65: 045303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang Y-T, Kim G-H, Huang CF, Lo S-T, Chen W-J, Nicholls JT, Lin L-H, Ritchie DA, Chang YH, Liang C-T, Dolan BP: Probing temperature-driven flow lines in a gated two-dimensional electron gas with tunable spin-splitting. J Phys Condens Matter 2012, 24: 405801. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/40/405801View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hang DR, Liang C-T, Juang JR, Huang T-Y, Hung WK, Chen YF, Kim G-H, Lee J-H, Lee J-H: Electrically detected and microwave-modulated Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations in an Al0.4Ga0.6N/GaN heterostructure. J Appl Phys 2003, 93: 2055. 10.1063/1.1539286View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Juang JR, Huang T-Y, Chen T-M, Lin M-G, Kim G-H, Lee Y, Liang C-T, Hang DR, Chen YF, Chyi J-I: Transport in a gated Al0.18Ga0.82N/GaN electron system. J Appl Phys 2003, 94: 3181. 10.1063/1.1594818View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Cho KS, Huang T-Y, Huang CP, Chiu YH, Liang C-T, Chen YF, Lo I: Exchange-enhanced g-factors in an Al0.25Ga0.75N/GaN two-dimensional electron system. J Appl Phys 2004, 96: 7370. 10.1063/1.1815390View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Cho KS, Liang C-T, Chen YF, Tang YQ, Shen B: Spin-dependent photocurrent induced by Rashba-type spin splitting in Al0.25Ga0.75N/GaN heterostructures. Phys Rev B 2007, 75: 085327.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Liang C-T, Simmons MY, Smith CG, Kim GH, Ritchie DA, Pepper M: Spin-dependent transport in a clean one-dimensional channel. Phys Rev B 1999, 60: 10687. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.10687View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Huckestein B: Quantum Hall effect at low magnetic fields. Phys Rev Lett 2000, 84: 3141. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3141View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Liu et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.