Open Access

Structure deformation of indium oxide from nanoparticles into nanostructured polycrystalline films by in situ thermal radiation treatment

  • Su Kong Chong1,
  • Siti Nur Azieani Azizan1,
  • Kee Wah Chan1,
  • Hong-Quan Nguyen2,
  • Wee Siong Chiu1,
  • Zarina Aspanut1,
  • Chang Fu Dee3 and
  • Saadah Abdul Rahman1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20138:428

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-428

Received: 16 July 2013

Accepted: 2 October 2013

Published: 17 October 2013


A microstructure deformation of indium oxide (In2O3) nanoparticles by an in situ thermal radiation treatment in nitrous oxide plasma was investigated. The In2O3 nanoparticles were completely transformed into nanostructured In2O3 films upon 10 min of treatment time. The treated In2O3 nanoparticle sample showed improvement in crystallinity while maintaining a large surface area of nanostructure morphology. The direct transition optical absorption at higher photon energy and the electrical conductivity of the In2O3 nanoparticles were significantly enhanced by the treatment.


Indium oxide Nanoparticles Structure deformation Optical Electrical


Indium oxide (In2O3), known as an n-type, wide-band gap (2.9 to 3.1 eV) semiconductor [1, 2], is of great interest for diverse technological applications in nanoelectronics and optoelectronics [3]. Zero-dimensional In2O3 nanoparticles (NPs), with a variety of tunable morphologies ranging from octahedra, hexagons, cubes, to pyramids, are beneficial as building blocks for indium oxide-based or hybrid transistors [4]. Their remarkably large surface-to-volume ratio and good stability have made them promising materials in gas sensors/biosensors [5, 6], photocatalysis [7], photoelectrochemical cells [8], and ultraviolet photodetectors [9, 10]. Despite the advantages of using this material, In2O3 NP-based devices usually encounter several deficiencies, for instance, low conductivity and poor adhesion. This could decrease the efficiency and stability of the devices. One of the reasons for the low conductivity of In2O3 NP-based devices is due to the weak interconnection between each NP [11, 12]. In this case, the carrier transportation between the In2O3 NPs is inefficient where charge carriers might be lost at the interface due to recombination or charge delocalization. Meanwhile, the In2O3 NP coating is usually not adhesive, thus making it easier to be scratched from the substrate. Hence, in order to solve these problems, it is crucial to improve the microstructure arrangement of the In2O3 NPs.

Several methods such as annealing and plasma treatments have been introduced to improve the structural and electrical properties of In2O3 nanostructures [1315]. A previous report [13] showed an increase in photoconductivity of undoped In2O3 thin films to about 102 (Ω cm)−1 by using a two-step thermal annealing method at an optimum temperature of ≤500°C. More recent research on femtosecond laser annealing of In2O3 nanowire transistors revealed significant improvements in device performance owing to the reduction in interfacial traps by using the treatment [14]. On the other hand, oxygen plasma treatment [15] serves as an alternative treatment method to improve the surface contact of tin-doped In2O3 for light-emitting devices. By combining rapid thermal annealing and nitrous oxide (N2O) plasma treatment, Remashan et al. [16] demonstrated almost two orders of increment in off current and on/off current ratios of zinc oxide thin film transistors.

A significant effort has been devoted to the advancement in synthesis and fabrication of In2O3 NPs using a variety of techniques including laser ablation, electron beam evaporation, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), pulsed laser deposition, sol-gel, and thermolysis [17, 18]. Of those, CVD is capable of high yield production and good crystallinity of In2O3 NPs [19]. The In2O3 NPs synthesized by this method typically have a higher purity level compared to those synthesized by wet chemical methods as the deposition is done under a certain vacuum level. In addition, the CVD-grown In2O3 NPs are usually oxygen deficient and have better conductivity than the homogenous stoichiometric In2O3[8]. In this study, a novel deposition of In2O3 NPs using a modified plasma-assisted hot-wire chemical vapor deposition (PA-HWCVD) system is reported. The deposition was done by evaporating the bulk indium wire in a nitrous oxide plasma environment. The vaporized indium atoms were oxidized by the oxidizing agents, then forming In2O3 NPs on the substrates. We demonstrate an effective way to improve the structural, optical, and electrical properties of the In2O3 NPs by introducing an in situ thermal radiation treatment under an oxidizing agent plasma condition. Compared to the previously reported treatment methods [1316], the proposed method offers a cost-effective, single-step deposition process to perform treatment on the as-deposited samples. In addition to surface treatment, this method can also be used to control the microstructure morphology and crystallinity of the In2O3 nanostructures to suit desired applications.


In2O3 NPs were deposited on a quartz substrate using a home-built PA-HWCVD system (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Indium wire (purity 99.999%) with a diameter of 0.5 mm and a length of approximately 2 mm was used as indium source. Tantalum filament coils were used for indium evaporation. The filament coils were preheated in H2 ambient at approximately 1,500°C for 10 min to remove the contamination before being used for deposition. The distance of the electrode and the filament with the substrate is fixed at 5 and 3 cm, respectively. The quartz substrate was heated to 300°C in vacuum (10−3 mbar) before starting deposition. Evaporation process was then carried out at a filament temperature of approximately 1,200°C in a N2O plasma environment. The rf power density for the N2O plasma generation is fixed at 1.273 W cm−2. The deposition pressure and N2O gas flow rate were controlled at 1 mbar and 60 sccm, respectively. For thermal radiation treatment, the temperature of the filament increased rapidly to about 1,800°C for 7 to 10 min after complete evaporation of the indium wire by the hot filament. The N2O plasma generation was terminated at 5 min after the evaporation process or the thermal treatment process.

A Hitachi SU 8000 field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) attached with an EDAX Apollo XL SDD detector energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscope (EDAX Inc., Mahwah, NJ, USA) was utilized to perform surface morphology study and chemical composition analysis of the samples. Structural properties of the samples were studied using a Siemens D5000 X-ray diffractometer (Siemens Corporation, New York, NY, USA) and a Renishaw InVia photoluminescence/Raman spectrometer (Renishaw, Wotton-under-Edge, UK). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using Cu Kα radiation at a glazing angle of 5°, and Raman spectra were recorded under an excitation of argon laser source with a wavelength of 514 nm. Photoluminescence (PL) properties of the samples were examined using a Renishaw InVia PL/Raman spectrometer under an excitation of He-Cd laser at 325 nm. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) micrographs of the samples were taken using a JEOL 2010 HRTEM (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). A PerkinElmer Lambda 750 UV/VIS/NIR spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was employed to obtain the optical transmission, reflectance, and absorbance of the samples. The optical reflectance spectra were measured at an incident angle of 45° to the samples. Electrical properties of the samples were studied using a Keithley Source Measure Unit 236 (Keithley Instruments, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) for current-voltage (I-V) measurement. Prior to the I-V measurement, gold electrodes (in circular shape, diameter of about 2 mm) were evaporated on top of the sample using a thermal evaporator. The distance between two consecutive electrodes was fixed at 2 mm.

Results and discussion

Figure 1a shows the FESEM images of the In2O3 NPs formed by the evaporation of In wires in a N2O plasma environment. A high density of NPs with an average size of approximately 40 ± 9 nm was found to be randomly distributed on the quartz substrate. A magnified FESEM image (Figure 1b) reveals the appearance of the NPs. Structures with different numbered facets (three, four, five, six, and eight faces) corresponding to triangular, rhombohedral, pentagonal, hexagonal, and octahedral shapes, respectively, can be recognized from the sample. These structures indicate that the In2O3 NPs formed are in crystalline state. The observed In and O signals from the energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum (Figure 1c) confirm the composition of the In2O3 NP. The Si signal that appeared in the EDX spectrum originated from the quartz substrate. The color of the In2O3 NPs changed from white to yellowish upon thermal radiation treatment (Additional file 1: Figure S2). The films appear to be more transparent after the treatment. The FESEM image depicted in Figure 1d reveals a compact nanostructured film for the sample after undergoing thermal radiation treatment. The sizes of the nanostructures vary largely from 60 to 300 nm. Meanwhile, we observed that the nanostructures mainly consist of shapes with fewer facets which are triangular or rhombohedral (Figure 1e). The EDX spectrum taken from the nanostructured films (Figure 1f) showed high signals of In and O, reflecting high purity of the nanostructured In2O3 films formed by this technique. The signal of the substrate (Si) was largely suppressed due to the closely packed structure of the In2O3 film, which limited the emission of X-ray from the substrate atoms after the thermal radiation treatment.
Figure 1

FESEM images and EDX spectra. FESEM images of (a, b) as-grown In2O3 NPs and (d, e) thermal radiation-treated In2O3 NPs. (c, f) EDX spectra of the as-grown In2O3 NPs and thermal radiation-treated In2O3 NPs, respectively.

Figure 2a shows the XRD patterns of the In2O3 NPs and the nanostructured In2O3 films formed after thermal treatment. The crystalline peaks are well indexed to body-centered cubic (bcc) In2O3 (JCPDS 76-0152). The absence of the In crystalline peak infers the complete oxidation of the In wire in N2O plasma. Thus, highly crystalline structures of In2O3 with a tendency to form a (222) crystal plane were obtained. The thermal radiation treatment improved the crystallinity of the In2O3 structure. The appearance of a more In2O3-related crystalline peak in the XRD pattern indicates a polycrystalline structure, forming the nanostructured In2O3 films. Crystalline sizes calculated from the In2O3(222) crystalline peak using the Scherrer formula [20] are 33.8 ± 0.1 nm for the In2O3 NPs and 43.2 ± 0.1 nm for the nanostructured In2O3 films. The size of the crystalline In2O3 NP is close to the measurement taken by FESEM (approximately 40 ± 9 nm), which evidently indicates a single-crystalline structure of the In2O3 NPs. The size of the crystalline nanostructured In2O3 film is relatively small compared to the size of the nanostructures (60 to 300 nm). Therefore, the nanostructured In2O3 film apparently consists of polycrystalline structures with an average crystal size of about 43 nm.
Figure 2

XRD patterns and Raman spectra. (a) XRD patterns and (b) Raman spectra of In2O3 NPs and nanostructured In2O3 films.

The structural properties of the In2O3 NPs and nanostructured In2O3 films were further confirmed by Raman spectra. Consistent with XRD analysis, the Raman spectra also provided evidence of the bcc In2O3. The observed seven Raman peaks located at 130, 248, 303, 362, 493, 594, and 626 cm−1 are assigned to the phonon vibration modes of the bcc In2O3[21]. The Raman peak of 248 cm−1 which was only detected by the highly oriented In2O3 nanostructure was presumably highly dependent on the orientation of the NPs [22]. Thus, it is usually insignificant in the Raman spectrum of randomly distributed In2O3 NPs [23]. In addition, PL spectra of the untreated In2O3 NPs and treated nanostructured In2O3 films are presented in Additional file 1: Figure S3 to provide a qualitative study on the structure defect of the In2O3 nanostructures. A broad orange-reddish emission centered at about 610 and about 660 nm was observed in all samples. This emission is normally attributed to the defect emission due to oxygen deficiencies [24] or the intrinsic defects related to oxygen [25]. The suppression of defect-related emission of In2O3 is correlated to the reconstruction of defect structures and improvement in crystallinity of In2O3 structures [26] by thermal radiation treatment.

HRTEM analysis of the nanostructured In2O3 films is presented in Figure 3. The TEM micrograph of the nanostructured In2O3 after thermal radiation treatment (Figure 3a) shows the agglomeration of the In2O3 NPs to form compact structures. The bundles of In2O3 formed by stacked In2O3 nano/microcrystallites can be clearly observed in the figure. Fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern (Figure 3b) consists of paired bright spots due to the crystalline structure of the individual In2O3 NPs. The paired spots create diffraction rings indicating a polycrystalline nature of the nanostructured In2O3 films, which is consistent with the XRD analysis. HRTEM investigation on the individual NPs reveals a single-crystalline In2O3 structure regardless of their shapes (Additional file 1: Figure S4). Meanwhile, the HRTEM micrograph of the In2O3 nanostructures treated with thermal radiation (Figure 3c) reveals multiple crystal orientations which provide the evidence of the crystal grains and bundles bonded by the In2O3 NPs.
Figure 3

TEM, FFT, and HRTEM. (a) TEM micrograph, (b) FFT electron diffraction pattern, and (c) HRTEM micrograph of the nanostructured In2O3 films.

The optical and electrical properties of the In2O3 NPs and the nanostructured In2O3 films were also studied. Figure 4a shows the optical transmission (T) spectra of both the In2O3 NPs and nanostructured films. The In2O3 NPs showed a high T of >90% at the NIR region (λ > 850 nm). The T gradually decreased with the reduction of λ in the visible spectral region. For the nanostructured In2O3 films, the T remained greater than 80% at a spectral region of λ > 550 nm, while it abruptly decreased to zero at λ = 330 nm. Both the T spectra of the In2O3 NPs and nanostructured film coincide at about the same absorption edge (approximately 330 nm), which indicates that there was not much modification of the optical energy gap (Eopt) for the NPs and film structures. Tauc plots for the In2O3 NPs and nanostructured In2O3 films are shown in Additional file 1: Figure S5. The Eopt of the In2O3 NPs and nanostructured films measured from the Tauc plots were 3.4 ± 0.1 and 3.6 ± 0.1 eV, respectively. Meanwhile, the Tauc plots of In2O3 NPs and nanostructured films reveal low-energy tails at 2.6 ± 0.1 and 3.0 ± 0.1 eV, respectively, which represent their fundamental band gap (Eg) [2]. The red shift of the Eopt and Eg of In2O3 NPs can be due to the defect in the energy levels formed by the oxygen vacancy in the nanosized In2O3 crystals [27]. The Eg value of the In2O3 nanostructures is closer to the theoretically predicted band gap of bcc In2O3 (2.9 to 3.1 eV) [1, 2] after undergoing a thermal radiation treatment. The lower T of In2O3 NPs in the visible region is attributed to the large surface-to-volume ratio of the structure of the NPs compared to more compact nanostructured films. The large surface area resulted in the total internal reflection between the interlayer of the NPs, effectively trapping the incident photons within the samples. This may also indicate an antireflection behavior for the In2O3 NP due to its high photon absorption. The optical reflectance (R) spectra (Figure 4b) of In2O3 NPs and nanostructured films are in accordance with this assumption. The R of the In2O3 NPs is <4% within the spectral region of 200 to 1,500 nm, which is about four times lower than that of the nanostructured In2O3 films.
Figure 4

Optical spectra and I - V plots. Optical (a) transmission, (b) reflectance, and (c) absorbance spectra and (d) I-V plots of In2O3 NPs and nanostructured In2O3 films.

The optical absorption properties of the In2O3 NPs and the nanostructured In2O3 films were further analyzed according to their absorbance (A) spectra as shown in Figure 4c. Two spectral regions can be recognized from the A spectra. At the visible region (λ > 350 nm), the A of the In2O3 NPs was greater than that of the nanostructured In2O3 films due to the larger surface-to-volume ratio of the NPs, which was previously discussed. Conversely, the A of the nanostructured In2O3 films was about one time greater than that of the In2O3 NPs at the UV region (λ < 350 nm), where the incident photon energy was greater than the Eopt of In2O3. The photon absorption at the high-energy (>Eopt) region is attributed to the direct transition of In2O3[28]. The nanostructured In2O3 films formed after the thermal treatment process possessed higher crystallinity and more compact structures compared to the In2O3 NPs. Thus, they can effectively absorb the incident photon during the photon interaction.

I-V plots of the In2O3 NPs and nanostructured In2O3 films are shown in Figure 4d. The increase in slope for the nanostructured In2O3 films indicates an enhancement in the conductance of the In2O3. This can be explained by the improvement in the interconnection between the nanostructures of In2O3 as shown in the FESEM images which thereby improves the charge mobility of the In2O3 structures. Moreover, the conductivity of the In2O3 nanostructures is also strongly related to surface-adsorbed oxygen molecules [29]. Upon exposure to air, the electrons in In2O3 nanostructures will transfer to the surface of the nanostructures and ionize the oxygen source from the air to form an oxygen surface layer. This process creates an electron depletion layer, thus reducing the conductivity of the In2O3 nanostructures. The large surface-to-volume ratio of the untreated In2O3 NPs indicates higher resistance compared to the treated nanostructured In2O3 films due to the significant amount of oxygen molecules bonded to the surface of the NPs which generated a broader electron depletion layer. Resistivity values calculated from the I-V curves were 4.3 × 10−2 and 1.3 × 10−2 Ω cm for the In2O3 NPs and nanostructured In2O3 films, respectively. The resistivity value of the treated In2O3 nanostructures is smaller than the reported value for the undoped In2O3 films (about 5 × 10−2 Ω cm) [30].

The characterizations above demonstrated that by changing their microstructure arrangement through the in situ thermal radiation treatment process in N2O plasma, there was an improvement in the crystallinity and optical and electrical properties of the In2O3 NPs. In order to understand the microstructure deformation process, the cross-sectional FESEM images of the untreated and thermally treated In2O3 NPs were analyzed as shown in Figure 5a. The untreated sample (Figure 5a(i)) showed a random orientation of the In2O3 NPs on the quartz substrate. The thermal radiation treatment on the In2O3 NPs (Figure 5a(ii)) subsequently separates the cross section into two layers with different morphologies. A magnified view of the upper layer revealed the stacking of the NPs between each other, forming larger bundles of In2O3 nanostructures. The In2O3 bundles were apparently formed by the agglomeration of the In2O3 NPs due to the thermal treatment. This layer was eventually turned into larger-sized (Figure 5a(iii)). The lower layer was mainly comprised of the In2O3 NPs, as shown in the magnified image of Figure 5a(ii). However, the NPs seem to be reorganized vertically from the substrate. An increase in the thermal radiation treatment time resulted in the formation of uniform, rod-like structures in the layer between the substrate and pyramid In2O3 grains (Figure 5a(iii)).
Figure 5

Mechanism for the evolution of In 2 O 3 NPs to nanostructured In 2 O 3 films. (a) Cross-sectional FESEM images of In2O3 NPs (i) without and with (ii) 7 and (iii) 10 min of thermal radiation treatment. The magnified FESEM images from the top and bottom layers of the bilayer nanostructured polycrystalline In2O3 films in (ii) are shown on the right-hand side of (ii). (b) Schematic of the structure deformation of the In2O3 NPs (i) into the nanostructured In2O3 films (ii, iii) upon thermal radiation treatment.

A mechanism for the deformation of the In2O3 NP structure into the bilayer nanostructured In2O3 films was thus proposed and illustrated in Figure 5b. In the upper layer (approximately 1 μm), the In2O3 NPs were expected to be exposed directly to the thermal radiation and plasma treatment. The discharged N2O vapors formed large quantities of excited O* species. The thermal radiation from the hot filament supplied extra heat to the O* to form energetic O* species. As the energetic O* species reached the surface of the In2O3 NPs, they were able to adsorb into the In dangling bonds or to extract the O atoms from the weak In-O bonds. This process activated the surface of the In2O3 NPs by leaving extra In- and O-free bonds. The closest surface between two NPs had a tendency to form In-O covalent bonds by sharing free electrons, thus resulting in the agglomeration of the In2O3 NPs. From a thermodynamic consideration, the nanostructures with fewer facets are usually more stable due to their lower surface energy [31]. Thus, in our case, the In2O3 NPs stacked up into bundles and eventually formed pyramids or cube-like In2O3 grains with the least number of faces. The transition of structures from octahedra to cubes and further to pyramids as preferred by the In2O3 nanostructures was confirmed by the planar-view FESEM as shown in Additional file 1: Figure S6a-c.

The microstructure deformation process for the bottom layer is slightly different from that for the top layer. The In2O3 NP agglomeration on the top layer created coverage for the NPs beneath them. Thus, the exposure of the In2O3 NPs to the N2O plasma was assumed to be negligible in this region. Heat transferred from the upper to the lower layer of the In2O3 NPs provided excessive energy for the reconstruction of the structure of the NPs. The NPs confined between the upper layer and substrate had enough space to reorganize to their preferred shapes. According to the surface energy of In2O3, γ{111} < γ{100} < γ{110}, the {111} plane possesses the lowest surface energy [32]. From the HRTEM analysis (Additional file 1: Figure S4), most of the In2O3 NPs were showing the (222) crystallographic plane. The NPs tended to reorganize in order to maximize the more stable {111} plane. One possible way was to arrange them vertically along the [100] or [110] direction with the lateral facet in the {111} plane. This explains the vertical alignment of the In2O3 NPs to form a rod-like structure in the bottom layer of the sample.


In summary, we demonstrated an effective method to enhance the crystal structure, direct transition absorption, and electrical conductivity of In2O3 NPs by introducing a thermal radiation treatment. We attributed these enhancements to the improvement in the microstructure of the In2O3 NPs to the nanostructured In2O3 films. This tractable and tunable microstructure deformation process is useful in a variety of In2O3-related technologies.



This work was supported by the UM/MOHE High Impact Research Grant Allocation of F000006-21001, the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) of KPT1058-2012, and the University Malaya Research Grant (UMRG) of RG205-11AFR and RP007B-13AFR.

Authors’ Affiliations

Low Dimensional Materials Research Centre, Department of Physics, University of Malaya
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chiao Tung University
Institute of Microengineering and Nanoelectronics (IMEN), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)


  1. Walsh A, Da Silva JLF, Wei SH, Korber C, Klein A, Piper LFJ, DeMasi A, Smith KE, Panaccione G, Torelli P, Payne DJ, Bourlange A, Egdell RG: Nature of the band gap of In2O3 revealed by first-principles calculations and X-ray spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 2008, 100: 167402.View Article
  2. King PDC, Veal TD, Fuchs F, Wang CY, Payne DJ, Bourlange A, Zhang H, Bell GR, Cimilla V, Ambacher O, Egdell RG, Bechstedt F, McConville CF: Band gap, electronic structure, and surface electron accumulation of cubic and rhombohedral In2O3. Phys Rev B 2009, 79: 205211.View Article
  3. Kumar M, Singh VN, Mehta BR, Singh JP: Tunable synthesis of indium oxide octahedra, nanowires and tubular nanoarrow structures under oxidizing and reducing ambients. Nanotechnology 2009, 20: 235608. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/23/235608View Article
  4. Han SY, Herman GS, Chang CH: Low-temperature, high-performance, solution-processed indium oxide thin-film transistors. J Am Chem Soc 2011, 133: 5166–5169. 10.1021/ja104864jView Article
  5. Elouali S, Bloor LG, Binions R, Parkin IP, Carmalt CJ, Darr JA: Gas sensing with nano-indium oxides (In2O3) prepared via continuous hydrothermal flow synthesis. Langmuir 2012, 28: 1879–1885. 10.1021/la203565hView Article
  6. Lee D, Ondrake J, Cui T: A conductometric indium oxide semiconducting nanoparticle enzymatic biosensor array. Sensors 2011, 11: 9300–9312. 10.3390/s111009300View Article
  7. Reyes-Gil KR, Reyes-Garcia EA, Raftery D: Nitrogen-doped In2O3 thin film electrodes for photocatalytic water splitting. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111: 14579–14588. 10.1021/jp072831yView Article
  8. Gan J, Lu X, Wu J, Xie S, Zhai T, Yu M, Zhang Z, Mao Y, Wang SCL, Shen Y, Tong Y: Oxygen vacancies promoting photoelectrochemical performance of In2O3 nanocubes. Sci Rep 2013, 3: 1021.
  9. Shao D, Qin L, Sawyer S: High responsivity, bandpass near-UV photodetector fabricated from PVA-In2O3 nanoparticles on a GaN substrate. IEEE Photon J 2012, 4: 715–720.View Article
  10. Zhang D, Li C, Han S, Liu X, Tang T, Jin W, Zhou C: Ultraviolet photodetection properties of indium oxide nanowires. Appl Phys A 2003, 77: 163–166. 10.1007/s00339-003-2099-3View Article
  11. Al-Dahoudi N, Aegerter MA: Comparative study of transparent conductive In2O3:Sn (ITO) coatings made using a sol and a nanoparticle suspension. Thin Solid Films 2006, 502: 193–197. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.273View Article
  12. Cheong DS, Yun DH, Kim DH, Han KR: Indium tin oxide (ITO) coatings fabricated using nanoparticle slurry and sol. J Korean Ceram Soc 2011, 48: 516–519. 10.4191/kcers.2011.48.6.516View Article
  13. Flores-Mendoza MA, Castanedo-Perez R, Torres-Delgado G, Marquez Marin J, Zelaya-Angel O: Influence of annealing temperature on the properties of undoped indium oxide thin films obtained by the sol–gel method. Thin Solid Films 2008, 517: 681–685. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.07.036View Article
  14. Kim S, Kim S, Srisungsitthisunti P, Lee C, Xu M, Ye PD, Qi M, Xu X, Zhou C, Ju S, Janes DB: Selective contact anneal effects on indium oxide nanowires transistors using femtosecond laser. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 17147–17153. 10.1021/jp203342jView Article
  15. Wu CC, Wu CI, Sturm JC, Kahn A: Surface modification of indium tin oxide by plasma treatment: an effective method to improve the efficiency, brightness, and reliability of organic light emitting devices. Appl Phys Lett 1997, 70: 1348–1350. 10.1063/1.118575View Article
  16. Remashan K, Hwang DK, Park SD, Bae JW, Yeom GY, Park SJ, Jang JH: Effect of N2O plasma treatment on the performance of ZnO TFTs. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 2008, 11: H55-H59. 10.1149/1.2822885View Article
  17. Murali A, Barve A, Leppert VJ, Risbud SH: Synthesis and characterization of indium oxide nanoparticles. Nano Lett 2001, 1: 287–289. 10.1021/nl010013qView Article
  18. Ye E, Zhang SY, Lim SH, Liu S, Han MY: Morphological tuning, self-assembly and optical properties of indium oxide nanocrystals. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010, 12: 11923–11929. 10.1039/c0cp00138dView Article
  19. Cheng G, Stern E, Guthrie S, Reed MA, Klie R, Hao Y, Meng G, Zhang L: Indium oxide nanostructures. Appl Phys A 2006, 85: 233–240. 10.1007/s00339-006-3706-xView Article
  20. Chong SK, Goh BT, Dee CF, Rahman SA: Study on the role of filament temperature on growth of indium-catalyzed silicon nanowires by the hot-wire chemical vapor deposition technique. Mater Chem Phys 2012, 135: 635–643. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.05.037View Article
  21. Berengure OM, Rodrigues AD, Dalmaschio CJ, Lanfredi AJC, Leite ER, Chiquito AJ: Structural characterization of indium oxide nanostructures: a Raman analysis. J Phys D Appl Phys 2010, 43: 045401. 10.1088/0022-3727/43/4/045401View Article
  22. Wang JX, Chen HY, Cao Y, Liu DF, Song L, Zhang ZX, Zhao XW, Dou XY, Luo SD, Zhou WY, Wang G, Xie SS: Synthesis and characterization of In2O3/SnO2 hetero-junction beaded nanowires. J Cryst Growth 2005, 284: 73–79. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.06.021View Article
  23. Chandradass J, Bae DS, Kim KH: A simple method to prepare indium oxide nanoparticles: structural, microstructural and magnetic properties. Adv Powder Technol 2011, 22: 370–374. 10.1016/j.apt.2010.05.006View Article
  24. Chong SK, Dee CF, Rahman SA: Structural and photoluminescence studies on catalytic growth of silicon/zinc oxide heterostructure nanowires. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 174. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-174View Article
  25. Mazzera M, Zha M, Calestani D, Zappettini A, Lazzarini L, Salviati G, Zanotti L: Low-temperature In2O3 nanowire luminescence properties as a function of oxidizing thermal treatments. Nanotechnology 2007, 18: 355707. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/35/355707View Article
  26. Zhou H, Cai W, Zhang L: Photoluminescence of indium–oxide nanoparticles dispersed within pores of mesoporous silica. Appl Phys Lett 1999, 75: 495–497. 10.1063/1.124427View Article
  27. Zheng M: Fabrication and optical absorption of ordered indium oxide nanowire arrays embedded in anodic alumina membranes. Chem Phys Lett 2001, 334: 298–302. 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01426-3View Article
  28. Weiher RL, Ley RP: Optical properties of indium oxide. J Appl Phys 1966, 37: 299–302. 10.1063/1.1707830View Article
  29. Batzill M, Diebold U: The surface and materials science of tin oxide. Prog Surf Sci 2005, 79: 47–154. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2005.09.002View Article
  30. Ho CH, Chan CH, Tien LC, Huang YS: Direct optical observation of band-edge excitons, band gap, and Fermi level in degenerate semiconducting oxide nanowires In2O3. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 25088–25096. 10.1021/jp208789tView Article
  31. Cao G: Nanostructures and Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. London: Imperial College Press; 2004.View Article
  32. Kumar M, Singh VN, Mehta BR, Singh JP: Tunable growth of indium oxide from nanoflute to metal-filled nanotubes. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 5450–5455. 10.1021/jp211658aView Article


© Chong et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.