Improving the efficiency of ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag inverted solar cells by sensitizing TiO2 nanocrystalline film with chemical bath-deposited CdS quantum dots
© Chen and Li; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 19 July 2013
Accepted: 20 October 2013
Published: 31 October 2013
An improvement in the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the inverted organic solar cell (ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag) is realized by depositing CdS quantum dots (QDs) on a nanocrystalline TiO2 (nc-TiO2) film as a light absorption material and an electron-selective material. The CdS QDs were deposited via a chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. Our results show that the best PCE of 3.37% for the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag cell is about 1.13 times that (2.98%) of the cell without CdS QDs (i.e., ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag). The improved PCE can be mainly attributed to the increased light absorption and the reduced recombination of charge carriers from the TiO2 to the P3HT:PCBM film due to the introduced CdS QDs.
KeywordsInverted solar cell Quantum dots P3HT:PCBM CdS Efficiency
Organic bulk heterojunction (BHJ) photovoltaic (PV) cells have received considerable interest due to their advantages over their inorganic counterparts, such as low cost and large-area manufacture capability [1, 2]. The organic PV cells have exhibited power conversion efficiencies of upward of 6% [3–6]. More recently, to improve the efficiency and the lifetime under outdoor conditions of the organic BHJ cell, the so-called inverted devices are reported. In inverted devices, metal oxides such as TiO2[7–13], ZnO [14–17], and Cs2CO3[18, 19] are deposited on indium tin oxide (ITO) substrate and act as the electron-selective contact at the ITO interface. The solution composed of electron-donating and electron-accepting materials was then spin-coated on the metal oxide layer to form a photoactive layer. Then, the air-stable high-work-function metal (Ag) deposited on top of the active layer serves as the anodic electrode for hole collection.
It has been reported that ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/Ag inverted solar cells under air mass 1.5 global (AM 1.5G) illumination have a low efficiency of 0.13% . The main reason may be due to the low efficiency of charge collection at the interface between the active layer (P3HT:PCBM) and top metal electrodes. One of the main strategies usually employed to overcome this problem is to insert interfacial layer materials such as poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) , MoO3[19, 20], WO3, and V2O5 between the active layer and anode (i.e., Ag electrode) to suppress the electron–hole recombination at the active layer/anode interface (i.e., P3HT:PCBM/Ag interface).
In this research, from another point of view, a new strategy is put forward to reduce the electron–hole recombination at the active layer/cathode interface (i.e., TiO2/P3HT:PCBM interface) by depositing CdS quantum dots (QDs) on a nanocrystalline TiO2 (nc-TiO2) film by chemical bath deposition (CBD) to enhance the efficiency of the ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag inverted solar cell without CdS QDs. The CBD method has been successfully used to deposit QDs onto the photoelectrodes to increase the light absorption in QD-sensitized solar cells . However, this method is rarely used in organic BHJ PV cells. In this study, to improve the power conversion efficiency of the solar cells, the deposited CdS QDs on the nc-TiO2 film were used to increase the UV-visible (UV–vis) absorption of the cells and the interfacial area between the electron donor and electron acceptor. Moreover, CdS, an n-type semiconductor, can serve as an electron-selective layer to reduce the recombination between photogenerated electrons and holes.
Our results show that the performance parameters, such as the short-circuit current density (Isc), the fill factor (FF), and the open-circuit photovoltage (Voc), of the cells with CdS increased largely compared to those of the cells without CdS QDs. As a result, the efficiency of ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag inverted solar cells increased to 3.37% from the efficiency of 2.98% of the ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/Ag solar cell. This study reveals the importance of chemical bath-deposited CdS in enhancing the efficiency of ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cells.
Formation of TiO2 nanocrystalline film on ITO substrate
The ITO-coated substrate is first cleaned by ultrasonic treatment in detergent and deionized (DI) water and then dried at 100°C for 10 min. The solution-processed nanocrystalline titania (TiO2) film was prepared as follows. A total of 0.2 g of titania nanoparticles (TiO2 P25, Degussa, Essen, Germany) was initially dissolved in a solution with 10 ml of ethanol and 10 ml of DI water, and then the TiO2 nanoparticle solution was stirred overnight. After that, the TiO2 solution was spin-coated onto the cleaned ITO substrate at 2,000 rpm, followed by baking on a hot plate at 150°C for 15 min to produce a TiO2 nanocrystalline film.
Synthesis of ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS film
CdS nanoparticles were assembled on the ITO/nc-TiO2 film by CBD, as described elsewhere [22, 23]. The prepared ITO/nc-TiO2 films were first dipped in a 0.1-M CdI2 aqueous solution for 10 s, in DI water for 10 s, in a 0.1-M Na2S solution for 10 s, and then in DI water for 10 s. Such an immersion procedure is considered one CBD cycle. In this study, the ITO/nc-TiO2 substrate after n cycles of CdS deposition was denoted as ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n) (n = 0, 5, 10, and 15). Note that for the ITO/nc-TiO2 substrate without CdS, n = 0.
Preparation of ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/Ag and ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag solar cells
After transferring the substrates into a N2 glove box, the poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT; Rieke Metals, Lincoln, NE, USA)/-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM; Nano-C, Westwood, MA, USA) (P3HT:PCBM) blend film was deposited onto an ITO/nc-TiO2 ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n) film by spin coating a 1,2-dichlorobenzene (DCB) solution that contains P3HT (20 mg/ml) and PCBM (20 mg/ml) with a weight ratio of 1:1 at 400 rpm for 90 s in a N2-filled glove box, resulting in an active layer of about 250 nm. Then, the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM films were thermally annealed on a hot plate at 150°C for 15 min (n = 0, 5, 10, and 15). Finally, the silver electrode (ca. 80 nm) was thermally evaporated at low pressure (<1 × 10−6 Torr). The active area of the device was about 0.04 cm2. For the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag devices (n = 0, 5, 10, and 15), the hole-selective layer of PEDOT:PSS (Clevios P VP Al 4083, Leverkusen, Germany) was spin-coated onto the prepared ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM films from its isopropanol solution at 4,000 rpm for 1 min. After that, the films were baked at 150°C for 10 min. Finally, the silver electrode was thermally evaporated. For each type of solar cells, 12 devices are fabricated to compare the performance of the cells.
Characterization and measurements
UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) was carried out using an S-4100 spectrometer with a SA-13.1 diffuse reflector (Scinco Co. LTD, Seoul, South Korea). The optical absorption of the P3HT/PCBM blend films was measured using a PerkinElmer 35 UV-visible spectrophotometer on quartz substrates (Waltham, MA, USA). The atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were performed using an Agilent 5500 AFM (Agilent Technologies, Chandler, AZ, USA). Field emission transmission electron microscopy (FETEM; Model Fei Nova 230, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) measurements were carried out by scratching a portion of the CdS/TiO2 sample, followed by ultrasonication for a few minutes. Then, a drop of ethanol was placed on a copper grid and subjected to high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses were carried out on a Tecnai G2 F30 TEM (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The crystalline phase and structure of the as-prepared ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS film were confirmed by power X-ray diffractometry (XRD; DX-2500; Dandong Fangyuan Instrument Co., Ltd., Dandong, China). Current density-voltage (I-V) characteristics of the as-prepared devices were measured using a Keithley 2410 source meter (Cleveland, OH, USA) in the dark and under the illumination of AM 1.5G simulated solar light (100 mW/cm2) provided by a solar simulator (Newport Inc., Irvine, CA, USA).
Results and discussion
Figure 2c shows the AFM topography image of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(5) thin film. The CdS nanoparticles can be clearly found in Figure 2c, and the dense CdS nanocrystalline film has been formed. The roughness of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(5) thin film for 0.5 × 0.5 μm2 is about 48 nm, which is much higher than that of the TiO2 nanocrystalline film, suggesting that the introduction of CdS nanoparticles may lead to a more larger interfacial area between the electron donor and acceptor. In our case, the increased roughness of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS/P3HT:PCBM film may provide an increased interface area between the P3HT and TiO2 or CdS compared to the ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM film without CdS, which obviously would increase the interfacial dissociation probability of photogenerated excitons at the P3HT/CdS and P3HT/TiO2 interfaces and thereby increase the photocurrent density of the cells . For a comparison, the AFM topography image of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(15) thin film is also shown in Figure 2d. After the introduction of 15 cycles of CdS deposition, the size of the CdS nanoparticle increased slightly. Importantly, the roughness is about 80 nm, which is higher than that of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(5) film, suggesting that the roughness of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS thin film increases with the cycle number of CdS deposition.
Figure 3b shows the XRD patterns of the as-prepared ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(10) (curve 1) and ITO/nc-TiO2 (curve 2) films. By carefully comparing the diffraction peaks in curves 1 and 2, it can be found that the intensities of two peaks at 2θ = 28.3° and 43.9° (corresponding to the (101) and (110) faces of CdS, respectively) in the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(10) film are greater than the intensities of those in the plain ITO/nc-TiO2 film, indicating the formation of the hexagonal-phase CdS.
Summary of PV cell performance under white light illumination with an intensity of 100 mW/cm 2
After the introduction of CdS, all the performance parameters of ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cells: Voc, Isc, PCE, and FF, are significantly improved compared to the cells without CdS, i.e., ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cell. After five cycles of CdS deposition, the cell of ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/Ag gives rise to a significant increase in Voc, which increases from 0.15 to 0.60, 0.40, and 0.33 V for n = 5, 10, and 15, respectively. This result can be explained as follows. On one hand, it is known that Voc is mainly dominated by the energy level difference between the donor highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the acceptor lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) levels in the polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells. In our case, before the deposition of CdS, the electron acceptor materials are TiO2 and PCBM. However, after the introduction of CdS, CdS also works as an electron acceptor. Apparently, the effective LUMO level of the acceptor should be determined by three acceptor materials, i.e., TiO2, PCBM, and CdS. Importantly, the CB level (−3.7 eV) of CdS is higher than that (−4.2 eV) of TiO2, which probably enhances the effective LUMO level of the acceptor and the energy level difference between the HOMO of donor and the LUMO of acceptor levels, ultimately increasing the Voc of the cells with CdS compared to the ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cell without CdS. On the other hand, Voc may also be affected by charge recombination in the cells under open-circuit condition. CdS as an electron-selective layer can prevent the electron from escaping the TiO2 to the active layer, which can be characterized by the shunt resistance (Rsh), calculated from the inverse slope of I-V characteristics under illumination at V = 0 V. A higher Rsh is more beneficial to the increase of Voc. This explanation is supported by the shunt resistance of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cells: 620, 350, and 290 Ω/cm2, for n = 5, 10, and 15, respectively, indicating an increased shunt resistance compared to the ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/Ag without CdS.
Besides, the improvement in both Isc and FF of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cells is also found. There are several reasons for Isc enhancement. The first one may be the reduced charge recombination from TiO2 to the P3HT:PCBM film when introducing CdS nanoparticles. It can be seen from the energy diagram shown in Figure 1b that the photogenerated electrons are injected from CdS and P3HT to TiO2 and PCBM, part of which may combine with the holes in P3HT. However, compared to the cells without CdS, the recombination in the cells with CdS is reduced because of the formation of the CdS energy barrier layer, which is similar to the case of CdS-sensitized TiO2 nanotube arrays . The increased interfacial area between the donor and acceptor as shown in Figure 2 after the deposition of CdS on TiO2 may be the second reason, which makes more excitons dissociate into free electrons and holes. The third reason may be the enhanced UV–vis absorption after the deposition of CdS (see Figure 4). The more absorbed light will lead to more charges and therefore increasing the Isc.
The reason for the increase in FF can be attributed to the increased Rsh as discussed above compared to the cells without CdS. For the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cells, however, with the increase of CdS cycle number n from 5 to 15, the Voc decreased from 0.6 to 0.33 V. The Isc decreased from 5.81 to 4.9 mA/cm2 and the FF decreased from 0.50 to about 0.36. These results might be caused by the increased roughness of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cells with the increase in cycle number n. On one hand, the CdS nanocrystalline film can prevent the charge transfer back from TiO2 to the P3HT:PCBM film. On the other hand, the increased absorption amount of CdS will increase the roughness of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS films as shown in Figure 2, which might lead to form small CdS nanoparticle islands instead of a uniform film. Some of these islands may not be fully covered by the P3HT:PCBM film, which leads to increased leakage current in the cells and therefore decreasing the Voc and Isc. The decrease in FF may be due to the reduced Rsh, which decreased from about 67 to about 21 Ω/cm2 with the increase of n from 5 to 10 (Figure 5). Finally, the PCE of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cells decreased from 1.57% to 0.61% (Table 1), which is still higher than that (0.15%) of the ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cell. Nonetheless, our results clearly show that the PCE of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(n)/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cells increased significantly by depositing CdS on TiO2. The best PCE of 1.57% for the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS(5)/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cell is achieved, which is about ten times that (0.15%) of the ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cell. To sum up, the three main reasons for the improved efficiency of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS/P3HT:PCBM/Ag cells are as follows: first, the absorbance of the spectra of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS/P3HT:PCBM film increased significantly due to the deposited CdS QDs; second, the deposited CdS layer between the nc-TiO2 and active layer (P3HT:PCBM) can reduce the charge recombination as an energy barrier layer; and third, the interfacial area increased due to the increased roughness of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS film compared to the ITO/nc-TiO2 without CdS QDs, which makes more excitons dissociate into free electrons and holes at the P3HT/CdS and P3HT/TiO2 interfaces.
CdS nanoparticles were deposited on a nc-TiO2 film by chemical bath deposition to improve the power conversion efficiency of the inverted solar cell with a device structure of ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag. In the case of ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag, deposited CdS does not only enhance the optical absorption but also suppresses the charge recombination. Finally, compared to that (2.98%) of the ITO/nc-TiO2/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag, the power conversion efficiency of the ITO/nc-TiO2/CdS/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag cell under white light illumination with an intensity of 100 mW/cm2 increased to 3.37% due to the increased optical absorption and the reduced recombination.
This work was supported by Henan University distinguished professor startup fund.
- Gunes S, Neugebauer H, Sariciftci NS: Conjugated polymer-based organic solar cells. Chem Rev 2007, 107: 1324–1338. 10.1021/cr050149zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dennler G, Sariciftc NS: Flexible conjugated polymer-based plastic solar cells: from basics to applications. Proc IEEE 2005, 93: 1429–1439.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun JM, Zhu YX, Xu XF, Lan LF, Zhang LJ, Cai P, Chen JW, Peng JB, Cao Y: High efficiency and high Voc inverted polymer solar cells based on a low-lying HOMO polycarbazole donor and a hydrophilic polycarbazole interlayer on ITO cathode. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 14188–14198. 10.1021/jp3009546View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Small CE, Chen S, Subbiah J, Amb CM, Tsang SW, Lai TH, Reynolds JR, So F: High-efficiency inverted dithienogermole-thienopyrrolodione-based polymer solar cells. Nat Photonics 2012, 6: 115–120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zou JY, Yip HL, Zhang Y, Gao Y, Chien SC, O'Malley K, Chueh CC, Chen HZ, Jen AKY: High-performance inverted polymer solar cells: device characterization, optical modeling, and hole-transporting modifications. Adv Funct Mater 2012, 22(13):2804–2811. 10.1002/adfm.201102937View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park SH, Roy A, Beaupre S, Cho S, Coates N, Moon JS, Moses D, Leclerc M, Lee K, Heeger AJ: Bulk heterojunction solar cells with internal quantum efficiency approaching 100%. Nat Photon 2009, 3: 297–302. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.69View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hau SK, Yip HL, Acton O, Baek NS, Ma H, Jen AKY: Interfacial modification to improve inverted polymer solar cells. J Mater Chem 2008, 18: 5113–5119. 10.1039/b808004fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin ZH, Jiang CY, Zhu CX, Zhang J: Development of inverted organic solar cells with TiO2 interface layer by using low-temperature atomic layer deposition. Acs Appl Mater Inter 2013, 5: 713–718. 10.1021/am302252pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shim JW, Cheun H, Dindar A, Kim Y, Zhou YH: Indium tin oxide modified by titanium dioxide nanoparticles dispersed in poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) for use as an electron-collecting layer in organic solar cells with an inverted structure. J Mater Res 2013, 28: 535–540. 10.1557/jmr.2012.278View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ornek O: The effect of TiO2 layer annealing medium on efficiency in solar cells in inverted structure prepared by TiO2. Ener Educ Sci Tech-A 2012, 30: 97–102.Google Scholar
- Tao C, Ruan S, Xie G, Kong X, Shen L, Meng F, Liu C, Zhang X, Dong W, Chen W: Role of tungsten oxide in inverted polymer solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 043311. 10.1063/1.3076134View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seim R, Choulis SA, Schilinsky P, Brabec CJ: Formation and impact of hot spots on the performance of organic photovoltaic cells. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 043304. 10.1063/1.3073857View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Waldauf C, Morana M, Denk P, Schilinsky P, Coakley K, Choulis SA, Brabec CJ: Highly efficient inverted organic photovoltaics using solution based titanium oxide as electron selective contact. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89: 233517. 10.1063/1.2402890View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang TB, Sun K, Liu XL, Wei W, Yu TZ, Gong X, Wang DL, Cao Y: Zinc oxide nanowire as an electron-extraction layer for broadband polymer photodetectors with an inverted device structure. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 13650–13653. 10.1021/jp303016fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gholamkhass B, Kiasari NM, Servati P: An efficient inverted organic solar cell with improved ZnO and gold contact layers. Org Electron 2012, 13: 945–953. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.02.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuwabara T, Nakashima T, Yamaguchi T, Takahashi K: Flexible inverted polymer solar cells on polyethylene terephthalate substrate containing zinc oxide electron-collection-layer prepared by novel sol–gel method and low-temperature treatments. Org Electron 2012, 13: 1136–1140. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.03.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Norrman K, Madsen MV, Gevorgyan SA, Krebs FC: Degradation patterns in water and oxygen of an inverted polymer solar cell. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132: 16883–16892. 10.1021/ja106299gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liao H, Chen L, Xu Z, Li G, Yang Y: Highly efficient inverted polymer solar cell by low temperature annealing of Cs2CO3 interlayer. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 173303. 10.1063/1.2918983View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li G, Chu CW, Shrotriya V, Huang J, Yang Y: Efficient inverted polymer solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 253503. 10.1063/1.2212270View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shin KS, Lee KH, Lee HH, Choi D, Kim SW: Enhanced power conversion efficiency of inverted organic solar cells with a Ga-doped ZnO nanostructured thin film prepared using aqueous solution. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 15782–15785. 10.1021/jp1013658View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tao C, Ruan S, Zhang X, Xie G, Shen L, Kong X, Dong W, Liu C, Chen W: Performance improvement of inverted polymer solar cells with different top electrodes by introducing aMoO3 buffer layer. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 193307. 10.1063/1.3026741View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen C, Xie Y, Ali G, Yoo SH, Cho SO: Improved conversion efficiency of CdS quantum dots-sensitized TiO2 nanotube array using ZnO energy barrier layer. Nanotechnology 2011, 22: 015202. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/1/015202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen C, Xie Y, Ali G, Yoo SH, Cho SO: Improved conversion efficiency of Ag2S quantum dot-sensitized solar cells based on TiO2 nanotubes with a ZnO recombination barrier layer. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 462. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-462View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen C, Wang MT, Wang KJ: Characterization of polymer/TiO2 photovoltaic cells by intensity modulated photocurrent spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 1624–1631. 10.1021/jp8032512View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leventis HC, King SP, Sudlow A, Hill MS, Molloy KC, Haque SA: Nanostructured hybrid polymer − inorganic solar cell active layers formed by controllable in situ growth of semiconducting sulfide networks. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 1253–1258. 10.1021/nl903787jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Herron N: Nanometer-sized semiconductor clusters: materials synthesis, quantum size effects, and photophysical properties. J Phys Chem B 1991, 95: 525–532. 10.1021/j100155a009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alivisators AP: Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science 1996, 271: 933–937. 10.1126/science.271.5251.933View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Michalet X, Pinaud FF, Bentolila LA, Tsay JM, Doose S, Li JJ, Sundaresan G, Wu AM, Gambhir SS, Weiss S: Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science 2005, 307: 538–544. 10.1126/science.1104274View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahmed R, Will G, Bell J, Wang H: Size-dependent photodegradation of CdS particles deposited onto TiO2 mesoporous films by SILAR method. J Nanopart Res 2012, 14: 1140.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luo J, Ma L, He T, Ng CF, Wang S, Sun H, Fan HJ: TiO2/(CdS, CdSe, CdSeS) nanorod heterostructures and photoelectrochemical properties. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 11956–11963. 10.1021/jp3031754View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Na SI, Kim TS, Oh SH, Kim J, Kim SS, Kim DY: Enhanced performance of inverted polymer solar cells with cathode interfacial tuning via water-soluble polyfluorenes. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 223305. 10.1063/1.3522893View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Servaites JD, Ratner MA, Marks TJ: Organic solar cells: a new look at traditional models. Energ Environ Sci 2011, 4: 4410–4422. 10.1039/c1ee01663fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.