Template-directed atomically precise self-organization of perfectly ordered parallel cerium silicide nanowire arrays on Si(110)-16 × 2 surfaces
© Hong et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 29 August 2013
Accepted: 11 October 2013
Published: 5 November 2013
The perfectly ordered parallel arrays of periodic Ce silicide nanowires can self-organize with atomic precision on single-domain Si(110)-16 × 2 surfaces. The growth evolution of self-ordered parallel Ce silicide nanowire arrays is investigated over a broad range of Ce coverages on single-domain Si(110)-16 × 2 surfaces by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). Three different types of well-ordered parallel arrays, consisting of uniformly spaced and atomically identical Ce silicide nanowires, are self-organized through the heteroepitaxial growth of Ce silicides on a long-range grating-like 16 × 2 reconstruction at the deposition of various Ce coverages. Each atomically precise Ce silicide nanowire consists of a bundle of chains and rows with different atomic structures. The atomic-resolution dual-polarity STM images reveal that the interchain coupling leads to the formation of the registry-aligned chain bundles within individual Ce silicide nanowire. The nanowire width and the interchain coupling can be adjusted systematically by varying the Ce coverage on a Si(110) surface. This natural template-directed self-organization of perfectly regular parallel nanowire arrays allows for the precise control of the feature size and positions within ±0.2 nm over a large area. Thus, it is a promising route to produce parallel nanowire arrays in a straightforward, low-cost, high-throughput process.
KeywordsSelf-organization Nanowires Ce silicide Si(110) Scanning tunneling microscopy
One-dimensional (1D) nanowires (NWs) have attracted significant attention in condensed matter physics and nanoelectronics because they exhibit peculiar properties due to many-body interactions in a 1D system [1, 2]. In particular, epitaxial rare-earth silicide (RES; RE = Y , Gd [4, 5], Dy [5, 6], and Er [5, 7]) NWs self-assembled on flat Si(100)-2 × 1 surfaces have been intensively studied by utilizing the anisotropic lattice mismatch between the hexagonal RES and the Si(100) surfaces. The metallic RES NWs with high aspect ratios have potential applications as interconnects in nanoelectronic devices because of their high conductivity, extremely low Schottky barrier height on n-type Si, perfect single crystalline, and atomically sharp interfaces with Si substrates. Moreover, these RES NWs also exhibit highly anisotropic band structures along the NW direction [4, 6]; they are another prototype of 1D electron systems.
Among a large variety of RES compounds, cerium silicide (CeSi x ) compounds (0.8 ≤ x ≤ 5.0) have attracted widespread interest owing to their several peculiar physical properties, such as intermediate valency, Kondo lattice, heavy fermion superconductivity, anisotropic transport, and magnetic ordering behavior, which originate from the interplay between the strong correlations of Ce 4f electrons and the hybridization of 4f electrons and conduction electrons [8–14]. Additionally, Ce-doped Si films have been found to exhibit various magnetic phenomena below 100 K, such as superparamagnetism, spin-glass behavior, and giant magnetoresistance [15, 16]. Furthermore, Si substrates have been regarded as ideal hosts for spin transport because of their long spin relaxation time due to a weak spin-orbit interaction, which leads to a long spin diffusion length in spintronic devices [17, 18]. Therefore, CeSi x NWs grown epitaxially on Si surfaces can become a promising 1D nanomaterial for Si-based spintronic applications. In this regard, there is an ongoing interest in the self-organization of CeSi x NWs on Si surfaces [19–21].
To understand precisely the exotic 1D physics of electrons in CeSi x NWs and to explore its utility for spintronic applications, it is essential to grow a perfectly ordered parallel array of periodic and atomically identical CeSi x NWs over a large area, allowing the accurate investigation of their detailed chemical, electronic, and magnetic structures by photoemission spectroscopy and magnetic circular dichroism . However, so far, no large-area (>1 × 1 μm2), well-regular parallel CeSi x NW arrays with uniform distribution and identical dimension can be formed on flat and vicinal Si(100) surfaces.
Recently, we have demonstrated that RE metals (e.g., Gd, Ce, and Er) can be self-organized to form a mesoscopically ordered parallel RES NW array on single-domain Si(110)-16 × 2 surfaces [23–25]. These parallel-aligned and unidirectional RES NWs exhibit identical sizes, periodic positions, large aspect ratios (length >1 μm, width ≤5 nm) exceeding 300, and ultra-high integration density up to 104 NWs/μm2. Such large-area self-ordered growths of massively parallel RES NW arrays on Si(110) surfaces can open the possibility for wafer-scale integration into nanoelectronic devices combining the well-established Si(110)-based integrated-circuit technology [26–28] with the exotic 1D physical properties of RES NWs.
To date, there is little knowledge of this template-directed 1D self-organization process that leads to the formation of well-ordered parallel RES NW arrays on single-domain Si(110)-16 × 2 surfaces. In this article, we have investigated the growth evolutions of CeSi x NWs on Si(110) surfaces over a wide range (1 to 9 monolayers (ML)) of Ce coverage by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). Our comprehensive study provides a detailed understanding of the 1D self-organization mechanism of perfectly ordered parallel arrays consisting of periodic and atomically identical CeSi x NWs on single-domain Si(110)-16 × 2 surfaces.
Results and discussion
Morphology and structure of the atomically clean Si(110)-16 × 2 surface
Figure 1a represents a typical large-scale (850 × 850 nm2) STM image of an atomically clean Si(110)-16 × 2 surface. The parallel up-and-down terraces of the 16 × 2 reconstruction have a huge area exceeding 2 × 2 μm2. Such uniform grating-like terraces over a large region can be used as a perfect template for the large-scale self-organization of a well-ordered parallel silicide NW array. In Figure 1b, a magnified image (70 × 70 nm2) clearly shows zigzag chains formed on the upper and lower terraces; the period of zigzag chains is 1.4 ± 0.2 nm [31, 32], indicated in Figure 1c. Additionally, two highest terraces with the white contrast are seen together with the pairs of the upper (bright) and lower (dark) terraces. The set of terraces with dark, bright, and white contrasts, due to the vertical height difference, forms the (17 15 1) vicinal facet and often coexist in 16 × 2 reconstruction . Figure 1c,d depicts the empty-state and filled-state STM images of this 16 × 2 reconstruction at atomic resolution. A pair of Si pentagons/tetramers forming zigzag chains in the upper and lower terraces is clearly resolved, as marked by two schematic pentagons/tetramers on the upper terraces in the empty-state/filled-state STM images, consistent with previous result . Figure 1e displays the cross-sectional profile across the up-and-down terraces of the 16 × 2 reconstruction along the line scan C in Figure 1b. The typical width and average height of these periodic upper terraces are 2.2 ± 0.2 nm and 300 ± 10 pm, respectively, and the periodicity (i.e., the pitch) of the uniformly spaced upper terraces is 5.0 ± 0.1 nm. These nanoscale sizes of upper and lower terraces on the Si(110) surface can make the template-directed self-organization with atomic precision.
Coverage-dependent morphologies and structures of CeSi x NWs
3-ML Ce deposition
Figure 3c,d shows an enlarged portion of the image in Figure 3b, recorded at two bias voltages Vb = +1.2 and -1.2 V, respectively. In the dual-polarity images, the parallel, registry-aligned NWs are well resolved. The empty-state image clearly shows that the rounded protrusions of the double bead chains in Figure 3b convert to pentagons and the bean chain becomes a trench. However, the pentagons in the left and right bead chains are oppositely oriented, similar to the orientation of the Si pentagon pair (Figure 1c). In the filled-state image, each 3-NW appears to comprise two chains of tetramers with the opposite orientation at both sides, similar to the orientation of the Si tetramer pair (Figure 1d), and a bean chain at the middle of the NW. Moreover, the contrast of these double tetramer chains is lower than that of the bean chain. Notice that the dark trench in Figure 3c inverts to the bright bean chains in Figure 3d when the bias polarity is reversed. The polarity dependence of these STM images clearly reveals that each 3-NW consists of a bundle of three chain structures with a charge modulation of alternating filled and empty states, indicating a pronounced ionicity of the chains . These results strongly suggest that the Si pentagon/tetramer pair on the upper terraces of the 16 × 2 reconstruction (Figure 1c,d) is split into two individual Si pentagons/tetramers upon Ce adsorption due to the preferential reactivity of Ce atoms with the Si pentagon pair on the upper terraces (Figure 2a), thereby leading to the formation of a bean chain at the middle of the 3-NWs.
Figure 3e plots the cross-sectional profiles of the line scan A1 across the parallel 3-NWs in Figure 3b. The average width of the 3-NWs is 4.0 ± 0.1 nm, which is about two times the width of the Si terrace (i.e., 2.2 ± 0.2 nm) as explained above. Also due to the strong chemical interaction of Ce atoms and the Si pentagon pair on the upper terraces, the typical NW height is decreased to 250 ± 10 pm, lower than the height of the upper Si terraces (i.e., 300 ± 10 pm). The periodicity of this parallel NW array is 7.6 ± 0.2 nm. However, the height of the zigzag chains on the substrate (i.e., 90 ± 10 pm) is almost identical to that of the lower Si terraces (i.e., 90 ± 15 pm), indicating that the morphology of the pristine lower Si terraces is nearly unchanged upon Ce deposition. These results support that most Ce atoms are preferentially adsorbed on the upper Si terraces. Therefore, the self-organization of this parallel array of uniformly spaced 3-NWs on the Si(110) surface is mainly driven by the heteroepitaxial growth of CeSi x on these periodic upper terraces of the Si(110)-16 × 2 superstructure.
The dimensions of the 3-NWs are similar to those of the GdSi x NWs . The origin of this similarity is explained in the identical 1D building block structure of these systems, i.e., the upper Si terraces. Although the empty-state image of the 3-NWs (Figure 3a,b,c) is very similar to that of the GdSi x NWs, the filled-state image of the 3-NWs (Figure 3d) is different from that of the GdSi x NWs, which may be attributed to the different electronic configurations of Ce (4f 15d16s2) and Gd (4f 75d16s2) that lead to different electron interactions on the Si(110) surface.
6-ML Ce deposition
Figure 4c,d shows the dual-polarity STM images of an enlarged area of the parallel 6-NW array in Figure 4b, recorded at Vb = +1.5 and -1.5 V, respectively. The empty-state image clearly shows a set of double zigzag chains with noticeably different apparent heights in each 6-NW. The right zigzag chains appear much higher than the left chains. However, the filled-state image shows that the individual 6-NW consists of two linear rows with distinct atomic arrangements, and the right linear rows are also higher than the left rows. The brightest large round protrusions in Figure 4d are extra Ce clusters. The dual-polarity STM images evidently show that the 6-NWs are registry-aligned and that each 6-NW indeed comprises a bundle of double chain structures with different morphologies and different atomic structures.
Figure 4e plots the superposition of the cross-sectional profiles of both line scans E1 and F1 across the empty-state and filled-state images of the parallel 6-NWs in Figure 4c,d. As clearly revealed in Figure 4e, all the parallel-aligned 6-NWs have an identical width of 5.0 ± 0.2 nm and an equal pitch of 6.0 ± 0.2 nm in both the empty-state and filled-state images. However, the widths of the left and right zigzag chains are 2.0 ± 0.2 and 3.0 ± 0.2 nm, respectively, while the double linear rows are equal to 2.5 ± 0.2 nm, close to the widths of the upper and lower terraces of the Si(110)-16 × 2 reconstruction (i.e., 2.2 ± 0.2 nm). The heights of the left and right zigzag chains are 70 ± 10 and 170 ± 10 pm, respectively, whereas the heights of the left and right linear rows are 90 ± 10 and 120 ± 10 pm, respectively.
The right chain height of 6-NW is much lower than the height of 3-NW, indicating that there could be an inward vertical relaxation of Ce atoms upon additional Ce adsorption, but the left chain height of 6-NW is slightly smaller than the height of the pristine lower Si terraces, suggesting that the left chain originates from the epitaxial growth of CeSi x on the lower terrace and also may contain an inward vertical relaxation. In Figure 4e, the topographic maxima of the double zigzag chains in the empty-state image and the double linear rows in the filled-state image are localized in the same spatial area (i.e., the right chains/rows). The spatial coincidence of the empty and filled states indicates that the 6-NWs may exhibit a covalent character. The results of Figure 4 strongly suggest that Ce atoms nucleated concurrently along the upper and lower terraces of the Si(110) surface to form CeSi x NWs consisting of double chain rows with different apparent heights.
9-ML Ce deposition
As seen in the inset of Figure 5a, the morphology of the substrate (the dark chain/row bundle marked by the dashed box at the left) is the same as that of the 9-NW (the bright chain/row bundle marked by the dashed box at the right). The topography profile of the substrate (Figure 5e) shows two nonequivalent zigzag chains with widths/heights of 1.4 ± 0.1/0.09 ± 0.005 nm (left) and 2.4 ± 0.1/0.16 ± 0.02 nm (right) at both sides and one linear row with a widths/heights of 1.8 ± 0.1/0.10 ± 0.01 nm in between. The widths of two chains and one row on the substrate are nearly equal to those of their counterparts in 9-NWs, respectively, but the heights of these two chains and one row on the substrate in Figure 5e are about half the heights of their counterparts in 9-NWs in Figure 5d. This result strongly indicates that the substrate can be regarded as a large-area parallel array consisting of 9-NWs with one-layer height (160 ± 20 pm). That is, the 9-NWs of two-layer height (340 ± 20 pm) exhibit a layer-by-layer growth mode. Multilayer NW growth is usually observed in the growth of other rare-earth silicide NWs .
As clearly shown in Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5, Ce atoms preferentially adsorb on the long-range grating-like upper Si terraces of the Si(110)-16 × 2 surface to form well-ordered parallel arrays of 3-NWs at the first growth stage with 3-ML Ce deposition and then react concurrently with both periodic upper and lower terraces to produce mesoscopically ordered parallel arrays of 6-NWs at the second growth stage with 6-ML Ce deposition. When the Ce coverage is further increased to 9 ML, the growth of parallel-aligned 9-NWs follows the framework of the parallel array of the 6-NWs and exhibits a layer-by-layer growth mode to form multiple-layer NWs.
The ability to grow mesoscopically ordered CeSi x NW arrays on Si(110)-16 × 2 templates with atomic precision demonstrates that this template-directed 1D self-organization based on the single-domain Si(110)-16 × 2 surface can allow us to control accurately the growth and the electronic properties of individual NWs on an industrially reliable scale. Moreover, the massively parallel arrays of periodic and atomically identical CeSi x NWs can provide an opportunity to understand precisely the exotic 1D physics of electrons in CeSi x NWs by photoemission and photoabsorption spectroscopy study. Additionally, the high quality of these periodic arrays together with their easy fabrication render such supergratings as ideal nanotemplates for directing further deposition of functional units. For example, the subsequent deposition of O2 on these supergratings can fabricate different types of parallel arrays consisting of periodic CeO2 NWs for various catalytic, electronic, and optical applications.
We have demonstrated a straightforward and efficient bottom-up nanofabrication for growing massively parallel arrays of highly periodic CeSi x NWs on a single-domain Si(110)-16 × 2 surface with atomic precision. Three different types of massively parallel arrays, consisting of periodic and atomically identical CeSi x NWs, are self-organized on the Si(110) surface at three Ce coverages of 3, 6 and 9 ML. The STM results show that the Si pentagon pairs serve as reactive nuclei for NW growth and account for the alignment of CeSi x NWs on the periodic terraces of Si(110) surfaces. The self-organization mechanism of periodic CeSi x NWs on Si(110) surfaces at different growth stages is presented. This natural template-directed self-organization of parallel CeSi x NW arrays on Si(110) surfaces does not require an anisotropic lattice mismatch and can be applied to other RE metals. At the first growth stage, each 3-NW comprises double bead chains on two sides, separated by a bean chain. At the second growth stage, all periodic 6-NWs consist of double nonequivalent zigzag chains. At the third growth stage, parallel-aligned 9-NWs are composed of a bundle of double nonequivalent zigzag chains at two sides and one linear row in between. During the various growth stages, the interchain coupling result in the formation of different registry-aligned chains bundled within the individual CeSi x NW. A variety of CeSi x NWs with different chain bundles provides an opportunity for tailoring exotic electronic properties. The ability to precisely control the feature size and positions of periodic CeSi x NWs within ±0.2 nm over a large area allows for wafer-scale integration into nanoelectronic devices.
This work was financially supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan under grant no. 100-2112-M-415-003-MY3.
- Deshpande VV, Bockrath M, Glazman LI, Yacoby A: Electron liquids and solids in one dimension. Nature 2010, 464: 209. 10.1038/nature08918View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barke I, Bennewitz R, Crain JN, Erwin SC, Kirakosian A, McChesney JL, Himpsel FJ: Low-dimensional electron gas at semiconductor surfaces. Solid State Commun 2007, 142: 617. 10.1016/j.ssc.2007.04.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iancu V, Kent PRC, Hus S, Hu H, Zeng CG, Weitering HH: Structure and growth of quasi one-dimensional YSi2 nanophases on Si(100). J Phys Condens Matter 2013, 25: 014011. 10.1088/0953-8984/25/1/014011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yeom HW, Kim YK, Lee EY, Ryang KD, Kang PG: Robust one-dimensional metallic band structure of silicide nanowires. Phys Rev Lett 2005, 95: 205504.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y, Ohlberg DAA, Williams RS: Nanowires of four epitaxial hexagonal silicides grown on Si(001). J Appl Phys 2002, 91: 3213. 10.1063/1.1428807View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Preinesberger C, Pruskil G, Becker SK, Dähne M, Vyalikh DV, Molodtsov SL, Laubschat C, Schiller F: Structure and electronic properties of dysprosium silicide nanowires on vicinal Si(001). Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87: 083107. 10.1063/1.2032620View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y, Ohlberg DAA, Medeiros-Ribeiro G, Chang YA, Williams RS: Self-assembled growth of epitaxial erbium disilicide nanowires on silicon (001). Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76: 4004. 10.1063/1.126848View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shaheen SA, Mendoza WA: Origin of multiple magnetic transitions in CeSi x systems. Phys Rev B 1999, 60: 9501. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.9501View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Drotzigera S, Pfleiderera C, Uhlarza M, Lo , Löhneysena H, Souptelc D, Löserc W, Behr G: Pressure-induced magnetic quantum phase transition in CeSi1:81. Physica B 2005, 359–361: 92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith JS, Zan JA, Lin CL, Li J: Electric, thermal and magnetic properties of CeSi x with 1.57 < x ≤ 2.0. J Appl Phys 2005, 97: 10A905. 10.1063/1.1847893Google Scholar
- Ehm D, Hüfner S, Reinert F, Kroha J, Wölfle P, Stockert O, Geibel C, Löhneysen H: High-resolution photoemission study on low- T K Ce systems: Kondo resonance, crystal field structures, and their temperature dependence. Phys Rev B 2007, 76: 045117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang H, Mudryk Y, Cao Q, Pecharsky VK, Gschneidner KA, Long Y: Phase relationships, and structural, magnetic, and magnetocaloric properties in the Ce5Si4–Ce5Ge4 system. J Appl Phys 2010, 107: 013909. 10.1063/1.3276211View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wosylus A, Meier K, Prots Y, Schnelle W, Rosner H, Schwarz U, Grin Y: Unusual silicon connectivities in the binary compounds GdSi5, CeSi5, and Ce2Si7. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010, 49: 9002. 10.1002/anie.201003490View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yokota T, Fujimura N, Ito T: Effect of substitutionally dissolved Ce in Si on the magnetic and electric properties of magnetic semiconductor Si1-xCe x films. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 81: 4023. 10.1063/1.1524030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yokota T, Fujimura N, Wada T, Hamasaki S, Ito T: Effect of carrier for magnetic and magnetotransport properties of Si:Ce films. J Appl Phys 2003, 93: 7679. 10.1063/1.1556116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Terao T, Nishimura Y, Shindo D, Yoshimura T, Ashida A, Fujimura N: Magnetic properties of low-temperature grown Si:Ce thin films on (001)Si substrate. J Magn Magn Mater 2007, 310: e726. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.938View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Žutić I, Fabian J, Erwin SC: Spin injection and detection in silicon. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97: 026602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Appelbaum I, Huang B, Monsma DJ: Electronic measurement and control of spin transport in silicon. Nature 2007, 447: 295. 10.1038/nature05803View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goshtasbi Rad M, Göthelid M, Le Lay G, Karlsson UO: Cerium-induced reconstructions on the Si(111) surface. Surf Sci 2004, 558: 49. 10.1016/j.susc.2004.04.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee HG, Lee D, Kim S, Hwang C: One-dimensional chain structures produced by Ce on Si(111). Surf Sci 2005, 596: 39. 10.1016/j.susc.2005.09.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee HG, Lee D, Lim DK, Kim S, Hwang C: One-dimensional chain structure produced by Ce on vicinal Si(100). Surf Sci 2006, 600: 1283. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.01.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gambardella P, Dallmeyer A, Maiti K, Malagoli MC, Eberhardt W, Kern K, Carbone C: Ferromagnetism in one-dimensional monatomic metal chains. Nature 2002, 416: 301. 10.1038/416301aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong IH, Tsai YF, Chen TM: Self-organization of mesoscopically ordered parallel Gd-silicide nanowire arrays on a Si(110)-16 × 2 surface: A massively parallel active architecture. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 193118. 10.1063/1.3590199View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong IH, Liao YC, Tsai YF: Large-area parallel Ce silicide nanowire array self-organized on Si(110) “16 × 2” template. Appl Phys Express 2011, 4: 115003. 10.1143/APEX.4.115003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong IH: Self-organization of mesoscopically-ordered parallel rare-earth silicide nanowire arrays on Si(110)-16 × 2 surface. In Nanofabrication. Edited by: Masuda Y. Rijeka: InTech; 2011:199–216.Google Scholar
- Mizuno T, Sugiyama N, Tezuka T, Moriyama Y, Nakaharai S, Takagi SI: (110)-surface strained-SOI CMOS devices. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 2005, 52: 367. 10.1109/TED.2005.843894View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teramoto A, Hamada T, Yamamoto M, Gaubert P, Akahori H, Nii K, Hirayama M, Arima K, Endo K, Sugawa S, Ohmi T: Very high carrier mobility for high-performance CMOS on a Si(110) surface. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 2007, 54: 1438.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neophytou N, Kosina H: Hole mobility increase in ultra-narrow Si channels under strong (110) surface confinement. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 99: 092110. 10.1063/1.3631680View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong IH, Yen SC, Lin FS: Two-dimensional self-organization of an ordered Au silicide nanowire network on a Si(110)-16 × 2 surface. Small 2009, 5: 1855. 10.1002/smll.200900286View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong IH, Liao YC, Yen SC: Self-organization of a highly integrated silicon nanowire network on a Si(110)-16 × 2 surface by controlling domain growth. Adv Funct Mater 2009, 19: 3389. 10.1002/adfm.200900974View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Packard WE, Dow JD: Si(110)-16 × 2 and Si(110)-5 × 1 surface reconstructions: Stretched-hexagon face-centered adatom model. Phys Rev B 1997, 55: 15643. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.15643View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- An T, Yoshimura M, Ono I, Ueda K: Elemental structure in Si(110)-“16 × 2” revealed by scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys Rev B 2000, 61: 3006. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto Y, Sueyoshi T, Sato T, Iwatsuki M: High-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy study of the ’16 × 2’ ⇔ (1 × 1) phase transition on an Si(110) surface. Surf Sci 2000, 466: 183. 10.1016/S0039-6028(00)00773-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kang PG, Jeong H, Yeom HW: Microscopic mechanism of templated self-assembly: Indium metallic atomic wires on Si(553)-Au. Phys Rev B 2009, 79: 113403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kirakosian A, McChesney JL, Bennewitz R, Crain JN, Lin JL, Himpsel FJ: One-dimensional Gd-induced chain structures on Si(111) surfaces. Surf Sci 2002, 498: L109. 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01806-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu BZ, Nogami J: A scanning tunneling microscopy study of dysprosium silicide nanowire growth on Si(001). J Appl Phys 2003, 93: 593. 10.1063/1.1516621View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- An T, Yoshimura M, Ueda K: Rearrangement of up-and-down terrace in Si(110) “16 × 2” induced by Sn adsorption. Surf Sci 2005, 576: 165. 10.1016/j.susc.2004.12.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.