We report a simple catalyst-free vapor-phase method to fabricate Zn1−xCuxO micro-cross structures. Through a series of controlled experiments by changing the location of the substrate and reaction time, we have realized the continuous evolution of product morphology from nanorods into brush-like structures and micro-cross structures at different positions, together with the epitaxial growth of branched nanorods from the central stem with the time extended. The growth mechanism of the Zn1−xCuxO micro-cross structures has been proposed to involve the synthesis of Cu/Zn square-like core, surface oxidation, and the secondary growth of nanorod arrays. By the detailed structural analysis of the yielded Zn1−xCuxO samples at different locations, we have shown that the CuO phases were gradually formed in Zn1−xCuxO, which is significant to induce the usual ZnO hexagonal structures changing into four-folded symmetrical hierarchical micro-cross structures. Furthermore, the visible luminescence can be greatly enhanced by the introduction of Cu, and the observed inhomogeneous cathode luminescence in an individual micro-cross structure is caused by the different distributions of Cu.
One-dimensional (1D) ZnO nanostructures (e.g., nanowires, nanorods, and nanotubes) are promising with extensive applications in nanoelectronics and nanophotonics due to their efficient transport of electrons and excitons . In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to three-dimensional (3D) hierarchical ZnO architectures which derived from 1D nanostructures as building blocks based on various novel applications [2–6]. To date, different kinds of hierarchical branched ZnO nanostructures, including nanobridges , nanoflowers [2, 8], rotor-like structures , and nanotubes surrounded by well-ordered nanorod structures , have been reported by using either solution-phase or vapor-phase method. However, these processes often require high temperature, complex multi-step process, or introduction of impurities by the templates or foreign catalysts in the reaction system. Therefore, it is still a challenge to find a simple and controllable synthetic process to fabricate 3D hierarchical ZnO architectures with novel or potential applications.
On the other hand, doping is a widely used method to improve the electrical and optical properties of semiconductors . Copper, considered as a valuable dopant for the achievement of long-searched-for p-type ZnO , can serve not only as a luminescence activator but also as a compensator of ZnO . In addition, Cu doping, leading to form donor-acceptor complexes, can induce a polaron-type ferromagnetic order in ZnO [14, 15]. Zn1−xCuxO has been previously employed as phosphor , an active material in varistors  and spintronic devices . Up to now, most of the investigations in the Zn1−xCuxO system have been focused on thin films and 1D nanostructures, such as Cu-doped ZnO nanowires , nanonails, and nanoneedles . 3D hierarchical Zn1−xCuxO nanostructures, posing many unique properties arisen from their special geometrical shapes and inherently large surface-to-volume ratios, show considerable promise for the development of nanodevices with multiple functions (e.g., gas sensor  and photocatalytic hydrogen generation ). However, thus far, there have been no reports of such Zn1−xCuxO hierarchical nanostructures.
Herein, we realize a simple catalyst-free vapor-phase deposition method to synthesize the Zn1−xCuxO hierarchical micro-cross structures. The branched nanorods are neatly aligned on four sides of the backbone prism, assembling the shape of crosses. The subtle variations of environmental conditions have triggered the observed continuous morphological evolution from 1D nanorod to 3D hierarchical micro-cross structures. A possible growth mechanism for the micro-crosses has been proposed. Detailed structural and optical studies reveal that the CuO phases are gradually formed in Zn1−xCuxO and Cu concentration can greatly influence the structural defects. Interestingly, the Zn1−xCuxO micro-cross structure exhibits distinct inhomogeneous cathode luminescence (CL), which can be attributed to the different defect concentrations induced by Cu through characterizing the emission of defects and contents of Cu over the individual micro-cross structure.
Zn1−xCuxO nanostructures were prepared on Si substrate by a simple vapor-phase method in a horizontal tube furnace (150 cm long). Figure 1a shows the schematic drawing of the experimental setup. Zn powders (0.80 g, 99.99% purity) and Cu nanoparticle (diameter 100 to 200 nm) powders (0.32 g) were firstly mixed as the precursor substances. Due to the size effect, the copper nanoparticles can vaporize at relatively low temperatures (approximately 600°C), although the melting point of bulk copper is higher than 1,000°C. These Cu particles were synthesized by adding Zn powders into the CuCl2 solution via the following chemical reaction: Zn + Cu2+ → Zn2+ + Cu. The mixture was loaded into an alumina boat and placed at the center of a quartz tube (2 cm diameter, 120 cm long). N-type Si (100) wafer cleaned by sonication in ethanol and acetone was employed as the substrate and was placed about a few centimeters (from 6 to 12 cm) away from the source materials to receive the products. As we will show later, the location of the substrate appears to be an important factor determining the morphologies and the Cu contents of the final products. The quartz tube was evacuated to approximately 10 Pa using a mechanical rotary pump to remove the residual oxygen before heating. The heated temperature of the furnace was raised to 750°C at a rate of 20°C/min. When the temperature reached 350°C, argon (99.999%, 220 sccm) was introduced, and then oxygen (99.999%, 80 sccm) was added to the carrier gas at the desired temperature of 750°C. The duration of growth lasted for 5, 30, and 60 min, respectively. We finally obtained a black layer on the Si substrate after the quartz tube was cooled to room temperature naturally. For comparative studies, we have also prepared the Zn1−xCuxO samples with different Cu contents as well as the pure ZnO nanostructure synthesized under the same experiment condition as the others but without copper source.
The morphology and microstructure of the structures were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; Philips XL30FEG, Portland, OR, USA) with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM; JEOL JEM-2100 F, Akishima-shi, Japan), and X-ray diffraction (XRD; Bruker/D8 Discover diffractometer with GADDS, Madison, WI, USA) equipped with a Cu Kα source (λ = 1.5406 Å). Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis was also performed during the FE-SEM observation. The bonding characteristics were analyzed by PHI Quantum 2000 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Chanhassen, MN, USA). The micro-Raman in the backscattering geometry and photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded at room temperature using a Jobin Yvon LabRAM HR800UV micro-Raman system (Kyoto, Japan) under Ar+ (514.5 nm) and He-Cd (325.0 nm) laser excitation, respectively. The CL measurements were carried out at room temperature using a Gatan Mono-CL system-attached FE-SEM (Pleasanton, CA, USA) with the accelerating voltage of 10 kV.
Results and discussions
As a reference, specimens of pure ZnO nanostructures were grown in the tube furnace system using Zn powder as the only source material. We can observe that the as-grown products always present the commonly reported nanowire morphology (Figure 1b). The length of the undoped nanowires ranges from 4 to 8 μm, and the diameter is about 150 nm. The high-magnification SEM image is shown in Figure 1 (b’), demonstrating uniform hexagonal cross sections and a smooth surface. With the introduction of Cu in the precursor, the as-grown Zn1−xCuxO samples exhibit three different morphologies (see in Figure 1c,d,e), which are deposited on the substrates at different positions (marked as C, B, and A in Figure 1a, respectively). For the sample at position C (as shown in Figure 1c), the nanorods are formed, of which the lengths become shorter (approximately 1.5 μm) and the diameters become bigger (approximately 250 nm). Some Zn1−xCuxO nanorods display deformed hexagon sections (see Figure 1 (c’)), which may be induced by doping. As seen in Figure 1d, a kind of brush-like structures appears (at position B). These brushes are randomly assembled by the nanowires. For the sample at position A, the low-magnification SEM image in Figure 1e shows that a large quantity of micro-cross structures formed. The definition of micro-cross comes from the geometrical similarity to the cross structures.
Figure 2a presents the corresponding high-magnification image of such a single micro-cross. We can notice that the micro-cross is a 3D hierarchical structure, which consists of four-folded symmetrical nanorod arrays of 1 μm in length and approximately 350 nm in diameter, together with a nanorod on the central stem having a uniform hexagonal cross section. Four arrayed nanorod branches stand perpendicular to the side surfaces of the central stem. We have also reduced the reaction time to 30 and 5 min in order to observe directly the morphology evolution with the reaction time and get information about the growth process of the micro-cross structures. Under the heating time of 30 min (Figure 2b), the homogenous cross-like structures have also been formed, growing with the length of the four-folded nanorods typically reduced to approximately 450 nm. When the reaction time was 5 min, we could only obtain one-dimensional square-like nanostructures with the edge length of about 200 to 300 nm (Figure 2c), which stands for the early growth stage of the structures. The corresponding EDX analysis shown in Figure 2d indicates that the major components of the as-fabricated sample are Zn and Cu, with a small amount of oxygen.
Further morphological and structural analysis of the micro-cross structure can be characterized by the HRTEM and selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) techniques. Figure 2e presents the TEM morphology of the individual cross structure, which consists of the nanorod in the central stem, together with the nanorod arrays on the side surface of the core. The central stem is too thick to be detected from the TEM observation. The lattice fringes and the corresponding SAED pattern of the cross-like structure are shown in Figure 2f,g, respectively, which are indicated in Figure 2e with a red square. The lattice spacing of 0.52 nm corresponds to the spacing of  crystal planes of wurtzite ZnO.
The above experimental observation reveals that the location of the substrate and reaction time exercise great influences on the morphologies of the products. After Cu is introduced, the ordinary pure ZnO nanowires change into three different morphologies with the variation of the location, i.e., stumpy nanorods, randomly assembled brushes, and well-organized micro-cross structures. It is speculated that the higher temperature (at position A, which is close to the central zone of the tube) is helpful to form a central core of the hierarchical structure. We could find out the clue from the original square-like core, which is shaped in the early stage of the growth process at position A (see Figure 2c). With the reaction time extended, branched nanorods grow epitaxially on the side face of the central stem (see Figure 2a,b). Since Cu has a high-symmetry cubic structure , we can assume that the reason for growing into four-fold hierarchical cross-like structures is because of the tetragonal-symmetry major core induced by the introduction of abundant Cu. In combination with previous reports [24, 25] and the details in our experiment, we suggest the following possible growth mechanism of the Zn1−xCuxO micro-cross structures.
At the stage of temperature rise, oxygen was still not introduced into the tube. Zn/Cu vapor easily condensed into a square-like core on the substrate. When the temperature reached up to the desired 750°C, the core was oxidized with the introduction of oxygen. The cubic core prism could provide its four prismatic facets as growth platforms for the secondary branched nanorod arrays. With the successive arrival of Zn/Cu and O2, the branched nanorods began to grow perpendicular to the central stem. Due to the considerable anisotropy in the speed of the crystal growth along different directions of ZnO, the nanorods with the right orientation, i.e., with the  direction perpendicular to the surface of the prism, could grow much faster than others. The lengths of the branched nanorods are increased with the growth time extended (see Figure 2a,b). In the whole growth process, there are no external metallic catalysts (e.g., Au and In) involved in the formation of micro-cross structures. That is, the 3D hierarchical micro-cross structure is synthesized by a simple catalyst-free direct vapor-phase growth method.
Figure 3a presents the corresponding EDX spectra of the yielded samples at different locations, which exhibit different Cu concentrations. The undoped ZnO nanostructures (noted as ‘0’ for ZnO) is used as a reference. Its EDX analysis indicates that the obtained structures are composed of only Zn and O elements. After adding Cu powder in the precursor, the appearance of the element Cu demonstrates that Cu is introduced successfully in the as-fabricated samples. From the atomic ratio of Cu to Zn in the EDX spectra, we can determine the molar ratio of Cu to (Cu + Zn) in the Zn1−xCuxO samples (from positions A to C in Figure 1a) to be x = 0.33, 0.18, and 0.07, respectively. The Cu vapor is more easily condensed on the substrate at the position closer to the central zone.
The structural phase evolution of the as-fabricated products with different Cu concentrations was also investigated by XRD, which is shown in Figure 3b. It is clear that all the diffraction peaks can be indexed to the hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO (JCPDS No. 36–1451) in the undoped one. In contrast, five small new phases emerge in the sample with the Cu content of 7%. These new phases in the XRD spectrum correspond to CuO (matched with JCPDS No. 01–1117), owing to the fact that the solubility of Cu ions in ZnO is quite low . Moreover, it is noted that with the increase of Cu content, these CuO diffraction peaks become more obvious and stronger. Meanwhile, the ZnO diffraction peaks remain nearly unshifted, indicating that the added Cu elements have no effects on the crystal structure of ZnO, which is coincident with the HRTEM results in Figure 2f.
Further evidence for the component of the as-prepared samples is obtained by XPS measurement, which is an excellent technique for understanding the oxidation state of the copper ion in ZnO. Figure 4 illustrates the high-resolution XPS spectra of Zn 2p, O 1s, and Cu 2p in the sample with the highest Cu content of 33% (a typical concentration in this work). As shown in Figure 4a, the XPS spectrum of Zn 2p reveals the binding energies of Zn 2p3/2 at about 1,021.8 eV and Zn 2p1/2 centered at 1,045.1eV, without any noticeable shift after the high-Cu doping . The XPS spectrum of O 1s (Figure 4b) is broad and asymmetric, indicating the presence of multi-component oxygen species. It can be resolved by using a curve fitting procedure: one is located at 530.3 eV and the other one is located at 532.4 eV. The former is inherent O atoms bound to metals (such as Cu and Zn), while the latter is associated with adsorbed oxygen . Figure 4c shows the core-level and shake-up satellite (sat.) lines of Cu 2p. The Cu 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 core levels are located at ca. 933.2 and ca. 952.9 eV, respectively, which are close to the data for Cu 2p in CuO . In our samples, it is easy to observe two shake-up satellites at about 8.7 and 10.9 eV above the main 2p3/2 peak. The existence of strong satellite features for Cu 2p rules out the possibility of the presence of Cu2O phase , corresponding well with the XRD observation in Figure 3b.
Figure 5 shows the Raman spectra of both the undoped ZnO and Zn1−xCuxO nanostructures with different Cu contents in the range 200 to 800 cm−1 measured at room temperature. In the undoped ZnO sample, the peaks at 331, 384, and 584 cm−1 correspond to the second-order acoustic (2-E2(M)) mode, A1 transverse optical (A1(TO)) mode, and E1 longitudinal optical (E1(LO)) mode, respectively . The sharp and strong peak at around 437 cm−1 can be attributed to the high-frequency branch of the E2 (E2(high)) mode of ZnO, which is the strongest, and typical Raman-active branch of the wurtzite crystal structure . In the Zn1−xCuxO nanostructures, the presence of the E2(high) mode confirms that they all have a typical hexagonal wurtzite structure, which is consistent with the above HRTEM and XRD observations. When the Cu content is 7%, the E2(high) and E1(LO) modes become broader and shift to lower frequency, as compared with the undoped counterpart. This may be due to the decrease in the binding energies of Zn-O bonds as a result of the Cu doping, indicating that the long-range order of the ZnO crystal is destroyed by Cu dopants .
On the other hand, three additional modes at around 290, 340, and 628 cm−1 can be observed. They are attributed to the Ag, B1g, and B2g modes of CuO due to the vibrations of oxygen atoms, respectively [33, 34]. From Figure 5, it is obvious that the intensity of the CuO peaks enhanced while that of ZnO peaks decreases with the Cu concentration increases up to 33%. Such behavior is caused by the competition of Zn and Cu during the oxidization process. In the sample with the highest Cu content of 33%, the formation of CuO is dominant, in spite of the fact that the lower melting point and higher vapor pressure of Zn than those of Cu under the same conditions . The formation of CuO is significant to induce the usual ZnO hexagonal structures changing into four-folded cross-like structures, in good agreement with the growth mechanism we have proposed above.
In order to investigate the effects of the different Cu concentrations on the optical characteristics in the yielded samples, we have carried out PL spectroscopy as shown in Figure 6. We can see that all the samples show two emission peaks: a sharp one appearing at approximately 377 nm in the ultraviolet (UV) region and another broad one in the visible region. The former is ascribed to the near-band-edge (NBE) exciton recombination, while the latter is quite complicated due to the native and dopant-induced defects in ZnO. The intensive PL emission peak at 495 nm is suggested to be mainly due to the presence of various point defects, which can easily form recombination centers. The peak corresponding to 510 nm is usually generated by the recombination of electrons in singly ionized oxygen vacancies with photogenerated holes in the valence band [36, 37]. Apart from the strong peaks at 495 and 510 nm, the visible band consists of at least four sub-peaks at wavelengths of 530, 552, 575, and 604 nm, resulting from the local levels in the bandgap of ZnO. The green shoulders at 530 and 552 nm are attributed to the antisite oxygen and interstitial oxygen, respectively . The peak at 604 nm is possibly caused by the univalent vacancies of zinc in ZnO. The origin of another peak at 575 nm has been rarely mentioned and is still unclear.
As can be clearly observed from Figure 6, the undoped ZnO possesses a strong near-band-edge UV emission together with a weak visible emission, indicating that the undoped ZnO nanostructures have a fairly high quality with low defect concentration (its PL intensity was 10 times magnified). After Cu is introduced, the UV emission is rapidly suppressed while the visible luminescence is greatly enhanced compared with the undoped counterpart, suggesting the poorer crystallinity and greater level of structural defects introduced by Cu ion incorporation into ZnO. The intensity ratio of the visible band emission to the UV peak increases from approximately 0.2 to approximately 150 with the Cu content change from 0% to 33%, demonstrating that the Cu doping strongly increases the concentration of defects. Nevertheless, the defects are believed to significantly improve a variety of surface properties, such as heterogeneous catalysis, corrosion inhibition, and gas sensing, which have been addressed by theoretical calculation and experimental data [38–40]. Furthermore, we have also presented in the inset the enlarged view of the UV peak between 360 and 405 nm. It is obvious that the introduction of Cu will cause a little redshift of the UV peak (34 meV under Cu contents from 0% to 33%) compared with the undoped one, i.e., a reduction of ZnO bandgap caused by the Cu doping.
We have also employed the high-spatial resolution CL technique at various locations within the same cross structure to explore the defect distribution and the local optical properties in an individual Zn1−xCuxO micro-cross. A typical secondary electron (SE) image of such an individual micro-cross is shown in Figure 7a. Clearly, there is a 200-nm square hole in the center of the stem, which confirms that the central zone is a cubic prism. Figure 7b presents the corresponding panchromatic CL image at the same place. Interestingly, the cross structure exhibits inhomogeneous luminescence. The strong CL emissions are mainly focused on the middle of the four-folded branched nanorod according to the intense distribution curve obtained along the axial line (yellow curve).
Figure 7c illustrates the typical CL spectra, which are acquired at the center stem (noted as ‘0’ on the axis in Figure 7b) and four different locations along one branched nanorod. The spectra exhibit similar features as the PL spectra, that is, a comparatively weak UV peak due to the NBE emission and a broad, strong peak in the visible region, which is attributed to the deep-level (DL) emission affiliated with defects and impurities. To further reveal the variation of the defect concentration, the intensity ratios of the DL emission to the NBE emission (IDL/INBE) at different locations are plotted in Figure 7d (marked as ‘CL Ratio’). We can notice that the ratio of IDL/INBE decreases from approximately 92 to approximately 5 with the location change from 0 to 1,000 nm, demonstrating that the concentration of defects strongly depends on the location. The center part of the cross-like structure exhibits the highest defect density. We have also performed the EDX analysis on three different location points along the branched nanorod to illustrate the evolution of the Cu content (marked as ‘Cu Content’ in Figure 7d). It is clear that the central zone of the cross structure has the higher Cu concentration of approximately 53.6%, while the edge part of the branched nanorod has ultra-low Cu content (nearly zero). The introduction of abundant Cu in the core has induced the usual ZnO hexagonal structures changing into four-folded symmetrical micro-cross structures, which is consistent with the abovementioned growth mechanism and EDX analysis (shown in Figure 2d). The Cu contents are consistently and significantly reduced from the central zone to the edge part of the branched nanorod, which may be caused by the Cu diffusion at the stage of epitaxial growth of branched nanorods from the central core. The spatial differences of the Cu content along the structure would induce the variation of the defect distribution, resulting in the distinct inhomogeneous luminescence within one micro-cross structure.
In summary, we report a new and delicate cross-like Zn1−xCuxO structure, in which four-sided branched nanorod arrays grow perpendicular to the side surfaces of the central stem. This structure is formed through the direct vapor-phase deposition method but without introducing any catalyst. By changing the reaction time, the possible growth mechanism of the micro-cross structures has been proposed to involve the synthesis of Cu/Zn core, surface oxidation, and the secondary growth of the branched nanorods. The location of the substrate is an important factor determining the morphologies (from 1D nanorods to 3D micro-cross structures) and Cu concentrations (from 7% to 33%) of the yielded Zn1−xCuxO samples. We have employed the XRD, Raman, and PL spectroscopies to demonstrate that the formation of CuO-related phases and concentration of the defects in the products have been greatly influenced by the Cu content. Moreover, inhomogeneous CL has been observed in a single micro-cross structure, which is generated from structural defects created by the Cu incorporation into ZnO. The presented method is expected to be employed in a broad range to fabricate other similar metal-doped ZnO 3D hierarchical structures for their potential device applications.
A1 transverse optical
E1 longitudinal optical
High-frequency branch of the E2
Field-emission scanning electron microscopy
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy
Selected-area electron diffraction
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
This work was supported by the National Major Basic Research Project (2012CB934302) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (11174202 and 61234005).
Laboratory of Condensed Matter Spectroscopy and Opto-Electronic Physics, Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Key Laboratory of Artificial Structures and Quantum Control (Ministry of Education), Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
School of Applied Physics and Materials, Wuyi University
Huang Y, Duan XF, Wei QQ, Lieber CM: Directed assembly of one-dimensional nanostructures into functional networks. Science 2001, 291: 630–633. 10.1126/science.291.5504.630View Article
Jiang CY, Sun XW, Lo GQ, Kwong DL, Wang JX: Improved dye-sensitized solar cells with a ZnO-nanoflower photoanode. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 90: 263501. 10.1063/1.2751588View Article
McCune M, Zhang W, Deng YL: High efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells based on three-dimensional multilayered ZnO nanowire arrays with “caterpillar-like” structure. Nano Lett 2012, 12: 3656–3662. 10.1021/nl301407bView Article
Wang ZQ, Gong JF, Su Y, Jiang YW, Yang SG: Six-fold-symmetrical hierarchical ZnO nanostructure arrays: synthesis, characterization, and field emission properties. Crys Growth Des 2010, 10: 2455–2459. 10.1021/cg9015367View Article
Zhang Y, Xu JQ, Xiang Q, Li H, Pan QY, Xu PC: Brush-like hierarchical ZnO nanostructures: synthesis, photoluminescence and gas sensor properties. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 3430–3435. 10.1021/jp8092258View Article
Wang ZL, Kong XY, Ding Y, Gao PX, Hughes WL, Yang R, Zhang Y: Semiconducting and piezoelectric oxide nanostructures induced by polar surfaces. Adv Funct Mater 2004, 14: 943–956. 10.1002/adfm.200400180View Article
Lao JY, Huang JY, Wang DZ, Ren ZF: ZnO nanobridges and nanonails. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 235–238. 10.1021/nl025884uView Article
Zhang H, Yang DR, Ma XY, Ji YJ, Xu J, Que DL: Synthesis of flower-like ZnO nanostructures by an organic-free hydrothermal process. Nanotechnology 2004, 15: 622–626. 10.1088/0957-4484/15/5/037View Article
Gao XP, Zheng ZF, Zhu HY, Pan GL, Bao JL, Wu F, Song DY: Rotor-like ZnO by epitaxial growth under hydrothermal conditions. Chem Comm 2004, 12: 1428–1429.View Article
Fan DH, Shen WZ, Zheng MJ, Zhu YF, Lu JJ: Integration of ZnO nanotubes with well-ordered nanorods through two-step thermal evaporation approach. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111: 9116–9121. 10.1021/jp070613zView Article
Kuo SY, Chen WC, Lai FI, Cheng CP, Kuo HC, Wang SC, Hsieh WF: Effects of doping concentration and annealing temperature on properties of highly-oriented Al-doped ZnO films. J Cryst Growth 2006, 287: 78–84. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.10.047View Article
Pashchanka M, Hoffmann RC, Gurlo A, Swarbrick JC, Khanderi J, Engstler J, Issanin A, Schneider JJ: A molecular approach to Cu doped ZnO nanorods with tunable dopant content. Dalton Trans 2011, 40: 4307–4314. 10.1039/c0dt01567aView Article
Xu CX, Sun XW, Zhang XH, Ke L, Chua SJ: Photoluminescent properties of copper-doped zinc oxide nanowires. Nanotechnology 2004, 15: 856–861. 10.1088/0957-4484/15/7/026View Article
Tian YF, Li YF, He M, Putra IA, Peng HY, Yao B, Cheong SA, Wu T: Bound magnetic polarons and p-d exchange interaction in ferromagnetic insulating Cu-doped ZnO. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 162503. 10.1063/1.3579544View Article
Kataoka T, Yamazaki Y, Singh VR, Fujimori A, Chang FH, Lin HJ, Huang DJ, Chen CT, Xing GZ, Seo JW, Panagopoulos C, Wu T: Ferromagnetic interaction between Cu ions in the bulk region of Cu-doped ZnO nanowires. Phys Rev B 2011, 84: 153203.View Article
Kryshtab TG, Khomchenko VS, Papusha VP, Mazin MO, Tzyrkunov YA: Thin ZnS:Cu, Ga and ZnO:Cu, Ga film phosphors. Thin Solid Films 2002, 403–404: 76–80.View Article
Kutty TRN, Raghu N: Varistors based on polycrystalline ZnO:Cu. Appl Phys Lett 1989, 54: 1796–1798. 10.1063/1.101267View Article
Liu C, Yun F, Morkoc H: Ferromagnetism of ZnO and GaN: a review. J Mater Sci Mater: Eletron 2005, 16: 555–597. 10.1007/s10854-005-3232-1View Article
Kouklin N: Cu-doped ZnO nanowires for efficient and multispectral photodetection applications. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 2190–2194. 10.1002/adma.200701071View Article
Zhang Z, Yi JB, Ding J, Wong LM, Seng HL, Wang SJ, Tao JG, Li GP, Xing GZ, Sum TC, Huan CHA, Wu T: Cu-doped ZnO nanoneedles and nanonails: morphological evolution and physical properties. J Phys Chem C 2008, 112: 9579–9585. 10.1021/jp710837hView Article
Zhang H, Wu JB, Zhai CX, Du N, Ma XY, Yang DR: From ZnO nanorods to 3D hollow microhemispheres: solvothermal synthesis, photoluminescence and gas sensor properties. Nanotechnology 2007, 18: 455604. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/45/455604View Article
Liu ZY, Bai HW, Xu SP, Sun DD: Hierarchical CuO/ZnO “corn-like” architecture for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36: 13473–13480. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.07.137View Article
Kraft K, Marcus PM, Methfessel M, Scheffler M: Elastic constants of Cu and the instability of its bcc structure. Phys Rev B 1993, 48: 5886–5890. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.5886View Article
Park WI, Kim DH, Jung SW, Yi GC: Metalorganic vapor-phase epitaxial growth of vertically well-aligned ZnO nanorods. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 80: 4232–4234. 10.1063/1.1482800View Article
Wu Y, Xi ZH, Zhang GM, Zhang JL, Guo DZ: Fabrication of hierarchical zinc oxide nanostructures through multistage gas-phase reaction. Cryst Growth Des 2008, 8: 2646–2651. 10.1021/cg070261lView Article
Xu HY, Liu YC, Xu CS, Liu YX, Shao CL, Mu R: Room-temperature ferromagnetism in (Mn, N)-codoped ZnO thin films prepared by reactive magnetron cosputtering. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 242502. 10.1063/1.2213929View Article
Jing LQ, Wang DJ, Wang BQ, Li SD, Xin BF, Fu HG, Sun JZ: Effects of noble metal modification on surface oxygen composition, charge separation and photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticles. J Mol Catal A: Chem 2006, 244: 193–200. 10.1016/j.molcata.2005.09.020View Article
Shuai M, Liao L, Lu HB, Zhang L, Li JC, Fu DJ: Room-temperature ferromagnetism in Cu+ implanted ZnO nanowires. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2008, 41: 135010. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/13/135010View Article
Damen TC, Porto SPS, Tell B: Raman effect in zinc oxide. Phys Rev 1966, 142: 570–574. 10.1103/PhysRev.142.570View Article
Phan TL, Vincent R, Cherns D, Nghia NX, Ursaki VV: Raman scattering in Me-doped ZnO nanorods (Me = Mn, Co, Cu and Ni) prepared by thermal diffusion. Nanotechnology 2008, 19: 475702. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/47/475702View Article
Jin YX, Cui QL, Wen GH, Wang QS, Hao J, Wang S, Zhang J: XPS and Raman scattering studies of room temperature ferromagnetic ZnO:Cu. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2009, 42: 215007. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/21/215007View Article
Xu JF, Ji W, Shen ZX, Li WS, Tang SH, Ye XR, Jia DZ, Xin XQ: Raman spectra of CuO nanocrystals. J Raman Spectr 1999, 30: 413–415. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199905)30:5<413::AID-JRS387>3.0.CO;2-NView Article
Goldstein HF, Kim D, Yu PY, Bourne LC: Raman study of CuO single crystals. Phys Rev B 1990, 41: 7192–7194. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.7192View Article
Zhu YW, Sow CH, Yu T, Zhao Q, Li PH, Shen ZX, Yu DP, Thong JTL: Co-synthesis of ZnO–CuO nanostructures by directly heating brass in air. Adv Funct Mater 2006, 16: 2415–2422. 10.1002/adfm.200600251View Article
Dai Y, Zhang Y, Li QK, Nan CW: Synthesis and optical properties of tetrapod-like zinc oxide nanorods. Chem Phys Lett 2002, 358: 83–86. 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00582-1View Article
Tian SQ, Yang F, Zeng DW, Xie CS: Solution-processed gas sensors based on ZnO nanorods array with an exposed (0001) facet for enhanced gas-sensing properties. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 10586–10591. 10.1021/jp2123778View Article
An W, Wu XJ, Zeng XC: Adsorption of O2, H2, CO, NH3, and NO2 on ZnO nanotube: a density functional theory study. J Phys Chem C 2008, 112: 5747–5755. 10.1021/jp711105dView Article
Polarz S, Roy A, Lehmann M, Driess M, Kruis FE, Hoffmann A, Zimmer P: Structure–property-function relationships in nanoscale oxide sensors: a case study based on zinc oxide. Adv Funct Mater 2007, 17: 1385–1391. 10.1002/adfm.200700139View Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.