Open Access

Wurtzite copper-zinc-tin sulfide as a superior counter electrode material for dye-sensitized solar cells

Nanoscale Research Letters20138:464

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-464

Received: 27 September 2013

Accepted: 26 October 2013

Published: 6 November 2013

Abstract

Wurtzite and kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) nanocrystals were employed as counter electrode (CE) materials for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Compared to kesterite CZTS, the wurtzite CZTS exhibited higher electrocatalytic activity for catalyzing reduction of iodide electrolyte and better conductivity. Accordingly, the DSSC with wurtzite CZTS CE generated higher power conversion efficiency (6.89%) than that of Pt (6.23%) and kesterite CZTS (4.89%) CEs.

Keywords

Counter electrode Wurtzite CZTS Dye-sensitized solar cells

Background

For the advantages of low cost, environmental friendliness, easy fabrication, and light-to-energy conversion with relatively high efficiency, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are listed as one of the most promising photovoltaic devices [16]. A typical DSSC has a sandwich structure: a dye-sensitized semiconductor photoanode, an electrolyte with a redox couple (triiodide/iodide), and a counter electrode (CE) catalyzing the reduction of I3- to I-. The CE in photoelectrochemical solar cells plays an important role in transferring electrons from the external circuit back to the redox electrolyte for catalytic reduction of the redox electrolyte. Up to now, the most conventional CE is fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass coated with a thin layer of platinum, which has the excellent electrocatalytic activity for the reduction of charge carriers in an electrolyte as well as high conductivity. However, Pt is scarce and expensive which makes the cost of DSSCs high and limits the potential large-scale applications. To address this issue, efforts have been made to replace the Pt CE. Currently, the researches about a CE alternative were focused on two aspects. Firstly, different materials were tried to be used as CE in DSSC devices, such as carbon-based materials [79], conductive polymer [10, 11], and inorganic semiconductor materials [1214]. Second, for the certain given CE materials, the effect of morphology on the efficiency of DSSC devices has received much attention. For example, in carbon-based CE materials, the different morphologies, such as nanotubes [15] and mesoporous [16] and hierarchical [17] structures, were used as CE in DSSC devices. However, for a special CE material, the influence of different phases on the efficiency of DSSC has not been reported.

In our previous work [18], we prepared wurtzite and kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) nanocrystals (NCs) using facile one-pot method. Hall effect measurement demonstrated that, compared to the kesterite CZTS films, the wurtzite CZTS films show a higher carrier concentration and lower resistivity. The high carrier concentration and low resistivity mean high electrical conductivity, which would result in the wurtzite CZTS which is more favorable when used as CE in DSSC. In former reports, the CZTS materials used as CEs usually possess the kesterite structure [1921]; however, the wurtzite CZTS has not yet been reported as a CE in DSSCs.

Herein, for the first time, using CZTS NC films as CEs, we discussed the effect of wurtzite and kesterite CZTS crystal structure on the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs. Through various characterizations, such as cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, the obtained wurtzite CZTS NC film was demonstrated as a more effective CE material to replace the expensive Pt, yielding a low-cost, high-efficiency DSSC compared to the kesterite CZTS CE.

Methods

Fabrication of the CZTS thin film for CE

The synthetic process of kesterite and wurtzite CZTS NCs was similar as before [18]. The CZTS NCs were finally dissolved in tetrachloroethylene and concentrated to 10 mg/mL. Then, CZTS NC films were fabricated on a FTO glass by drop coating method using the obtained ‘nano-ink’. The thickness of the two CZTS layers prepared by dropcasting was about 2 μm. After coating, the CZTS NC films were vacuum-dried at 60°C, and then a post-annealing process was conducted in argon atmosphere at a rate of 2°C/min and held at 500°C for 30 min.

Device assembly

Porous TiO2 photoanodes were immersed overnight in 0.3 mM ethanolic solution of N-719 at room temperature to absorb the dye. The TiO2 photoanodes were then taken out and rinsed with ethanol to remove the excess dye adsorbed and dried in air at room temperature. The sandwich-type solar cell was assembled by placing the CZTS CE on the N-719 dye-sensitized photoelectrode (working electrode) and clipped together as an open cell for measurements. The cell was then filled with a liquid electrolyte composed of 0.1 M anhydrous LiI, 0.12 M I2, 1.0 M 1,2-dimethyl-3-n-propylimidazolium iodide (DMPII), and 0.5 M tert-butylpyridine in dehydrated acetonitrile by capillary force.

Results and discussion

Crystal structures of the CZTS thin films after annealing were confirmed by XRD patterns (Figure 1). The major diffraction peaks of the kesterite CZTS thin film can be indexed to kesterite CZTS (JCPDS 26–0575) [2224] (red curve) and to cation-disordered wurtzite CZTS [25] (black curve), respectively. No characteristic peaks of other impurities are detected, such as ZnS, CuS, or Cu2S.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-464/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1709_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

X-ray diffraction patterns of the as-obtained CZTS thin films after annealing.

Figure 2 shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the cross section of the kesterite (d) and wurtzite (b) CZTS thin films with sintering at 500°C for 30 min, respectively. Since these CZTS films were composed of CZTS NCs, the films possess a relatively high surface area (Additional file 1: Figure S1). From the images of the cross section, we can observe that the CZTS films were very dense and compact without cracks. The thickness of two CZTS films was about 2 μm. The SEM results illuminated that the thickness and compactness of the wurtzite and kesterite CZTS films were very similar in our experiments.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-464/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1709_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

SEM images of CZTS NCs films. (a) Top view and (b) cross section of the wurtzite film. (c) Top view and (d) cross section of the kesterite film with sintering at 500°C for 30 min.

The electrocatalytic activity of CZTS CEs under the I-/I3- electrochemical system using a three-electrode system was investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) (shown in Figure 3). The cyclic voltammograms of I-/I3- redox reaction on different CZTS CEs are similar; two pairs of redox peaks (Ox-1/Red-1, Ox-2/Red-2) are observed. As we knew, the peak currents and the peak-to-peak (Ox-1 to Red-1) separation (Epp) are two important parameters for catalytic activities [2628]. From Figure 3 and Table 1, the higher peak current density and lower Epp value reveal that the wurtzite CZTS film as CE material is a remarkable electrochemical catalyst for the reduction of I3-, even better than the Pt CE. At the same time, the lower peak currents and larger Epp illustrate that the electrocatalytic activity of the kesterite CZTS is inferior to that of wurtzite CZTS. Since all of the Epp are more than 30 mV, the reaction of the I-/I3- redox couple at the CE/electrolyte interface should be a quasi-reversible electrode process.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-464/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1709_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Cyclic voltammograms of different CEs with a scan rate of 50 mV s -1 .

Table 1

Photovoltaic parameters and fitted impedance parameters

CEs

Thickness (μm)

Jsc(mA/cm2)

Voc(V)

FF (%)

PCE (%)

Rs(Ω cm2)

Rct(Ω cm2)

Epp (V)

Pt

0.10

11.43

0.78

69.84

6.23

15.91

2.92

0.536

Wurtzite

2.12

13.41

0.75

68.69

6.89

16.20

2.78

0.528

Kesterite

2.20

10.20

0.73

65.72

4.89

17.02

3.56

0.760

Photovoltaic parameters for various DSSCs fabricated using different counter electrodes and the fitted impedance parameters extracted from fabricated symmetric cells are as follows: Jsc, short-circuit current density; V oc , open-circuit voltage; FF, fill factor; R s , series resistance; R ct , charge transfer resistance.

The performance of CE materials in DSSC devices depends not only on its catalytic activity, but also on the electrical conductivity [29, 30]. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is an effective and widely used tool for investigating the charge transfer process and thereby for evaluating the catalytic activity of a catalyst [31]. Figure 4 shows the Nyquist plots for the devices with wurtzite and kesterite CZTS CEs. The high-frequency intercept on the real axis corresponds to the series resistance (Rs). The first semicircle at the high-frequency region arises from the charge transfer property (Rct). The values of Rs and Rct obtained by fitting the spectra in Figure 5 with an EIS spectrum analyzer are summarized in Table 1. The largest Rs (17.02 Ω) of kesterite CZTS CE can be attributed to the strong ligand of oleylamine on the CZTS NC surface. Similarly, some organic substance capped on the surface of the wurtzite CZTS NCs made the Rs (16.2 Ω) of wurtzite CZTS CE higher than that (15.91 Ω) of Pt CE. However, the value of Rct (2.78 Ω) of the wurtzite CZTS CE is lower than that of Pt (2.92 Ω) and kesterite CZTS (3.56 Ω). The smallest Rct for wurtzite CZTS CE implies that it has eximious catalytic activity on the reduction of triiodide and supersedes the expensive Pt as the CE in DSSCs. The conclusions for the catalytic activity derived from the EIS and CV data are consistent.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-464/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1709_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Nyquist plots for different CEs. The test was performed with the symmetrical cells fabricated with two identical electrodes.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-464/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1709_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Current density-voltage ( J - V ) curves of DSSCs based on different CEs under AM 1.5 (100 mW cm -2 ).

Figure 5 shows the photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) curves of these DSSCs with different CE materials, and the detailed photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Table 1. For the DSSC using the kesterite CZTS CE material, the power conversion efficiency (η) of the device was relatively low (4.89%), since the data of photovoltaic parameters such asJsc, Voc, and FF were low (Jsc = 10.20 mA/cm2, Voc = 0.73 V, FF = 65.72%, respectively). For the wurtzite CZTS CE material, the efficiency of the DSSC device was high (6.89%); the high performance resulted from the improved photovoltaic parameters, such asJsc, Voc, and FF (Jsc = 13.41 mA/cm2, Voc = 0.75 V, FF = 68.69%, respectively). The efficiency of the DSSC using wurtzite CZTS CE was even better than that of Pt CE (η = 6.23%, Jsc = 11.43 mA/cm2). The values of Vocwere almost constant in these DSSC devices using different CE materials. The difference of the efficiency of DSSC devices mainly resulted from the parameters of Jsc and FF. The high FF of the wurtzite CZTS CE may be attributed to its relatively low Rs[32]. The highest Jsc for wurtzite CZTS should come from its high carrier concentration and low resistivity. According to our previous result, the Hall effect measurement demonstrated that compared to the kesterite CZTS films, the wurtzite CZTS films show a higher carrier concentration and lower resistivity [18]. Wurtzite CZTS is a hexagonal crystal system and metastable; perhaps, this structure is beneficial for catalysis and charge conductivity. The J-V results signify that the wurtzite CZTS could be a somewhat economical and effective CE material for DSSC.

Conclusions

In this work, we used the wurtzite and kesterite CZTS NC films as effective CEs in DSSCs. The measurement of the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs showed that the wurtzite CZTS CE exhibited higher solar energy conversion efficiency (6.89%). The results of CV and EIS demonstrated the superior electrocatalytic activity of the wurtzite CZTS NC films. The excellent performance of the wurtzite CZTS CE paves a new pathway for preparing cheap and highly efficient CEs for DSSCs.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21203053, 61306016 and 21271064) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCS IRT1126).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Key Laboratory for Special Functional Material of MOE, Henan University

References

  1. O'Regan B, Grätzel M: A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2films. Nature 1991, 353: 737–740. 10.1038/353737a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Grätzel M: Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 2001, 414: 338–344. 10.1038/35104607View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hamann TW, Jensen RA, Martinson ABF, Ryswyk HV, Hupp JT: Advancing beyond current generation dye-sensitized solar cells. Energ Environ Sci 2008, 1: 66–78. 10.1039/b809672dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Grätzel M: Recent advances in sensitized mesoscopic solar cells. Acc Chem Res 2009, 42: 1788–1798. 10.1021/ar900141yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hagfeldt A, Boschloo G, Sun L, Kloo L, Pettersson H: Dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Rev 2010, 110: 6595–6663. 10.1021/cr900356pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Peter LM: The Grätzel cell: where next? J Phys Chem Lett 2011, 2: 1861–1867. 10.1021/jz200668qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim H, Choi H, Hwang S, Kim Y, Jeon M: Fabrication and characterization of carbon-based counter electrodes prepared by electrophoretic deposition for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 53. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-53View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cha SI, Koo BK, Seo SH, Dong Y, Lee DY: Pt-free transparent counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells prepared from carbon nanotube micro-balls. J Mater Chem 2010, 20: 659–662. 10.1039/b918920cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lim J, Ryu SY, Kim J, Jun Y: A study of TiO2/carbon black composition as counter electrode materials for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 227. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-227View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee KM, Hsu CY, Chen PY, Ikegami M, Miyasaka T, Ho KC: Highly porous PProDOT-Et2 film as counter electrode for plastic dye-sensitized solar cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2009, 11: 3375–3379. 10.1039/b823011kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tai QD, Chen BL, Guo F, Xu S, Hu H, Sebo B, Zhao XZ: In situ prepared transparent polyaniline electrode and its application in bifacial dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 3795–3799. 10.1021/nn200133gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang M, Anghel AM, Marsan B, Ha NLC, Pootrakulchote N, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M: CoS supersedes Pt as efficient electrocatalyst for triiodide reduction in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 15976–15977. 10.1021/ja905970yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu Y, Xie Y, Cui H, Zhao W, Yang C, Wang Y, Huang F, Dai N: Preparation of monodispersed CuInS2 nanopompons and nanoflake films and application in dye-sensitized solar cells. Phys Chem Chem Phy 2013, 15: 4496–4499. 10.1039/c3cp44485fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu MX, Zhang QY, Xiao JQ, Ma CY, Lin X, Miao CY, He YJ, Gao YR, Hagfeldt A, Ma TL: Two flexible counter electrodes based on molybdenum and tungsten nitrides for dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 10761–10766. 10.1039/c1jm11422kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang S, Sun H, Huang X, Zhang Q, Li D, Luo Y, Meng Q: Carbon nanotube counter electrode for high-efficient fibrous dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 222. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-222View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhao B, Huang H, Jiang P, Zhao H, Huang X, Shen P, Wu D, Fu R, Tan S: Flexible counter electrodes based on mesoporous carbon aerogel for high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 22615–22621. 10.1021/jp206043aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Paul GS, Kim JH, Kim MS, Do K, Ko J, Yu JS: Different hierarchical nanostructured carbons as counter electrodes for CdS quantum dot solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2012, 4: 375–381. 10.1021/am201452sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Li M, Zhou WH, Guo J, Zhou YL, Hou ZL, Jiao J, Zhou ZJ, Du ZL, Wu SX: Synthesis of pure metastable wurtzite CZTS nanocrystals by facile one-pot method. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 26507–26516. 10.1021/jp307346kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Jung Y, Um HD, Jee SW, Choi HM, Bang JH, Lee JH, Cao YB, Xiao YJ: Highly electrocatalytic Cu2ZnSn(S1-xSex)4 counter electrodes for quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013, 5: 479–484. 10.1021/am302522cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Dai PC, Zhang G, Chen YC, Jiang HC, Feng ZY, Lin ZJ, Zhan JH: Porous copper zinc tin sulfide thin film as photocathode for double junction photoelectrochemical solar cells. Chem Commun 2012, 48: 3006–3008. 10.1039/c2cc17652aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Xin XK, He M, Han W, Jung J, Lin ZQ: Low-cost copper zinc tin sulfide counter electrodes for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 2011, 50: 11739–11742. 10.1002/anie.201104786View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo Q, Hillhouse HW, Agrawal R: Synthesis of Cu2ZnSnS4 nanocrystal ink and its use for solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 11672–11673. 10.1021/ja904981rView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Steinhagen C, Panthani MG, Akhavan V, Goodfellow B, Koo B, Korgel BA: Synthesis of Cu2ZnSnS4 nanocrystals for use in low-cost photovoltaics. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 12554–12555. 10.1021/ja905922jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Riha SC, Parkinson BA, Prieto AL: Solution-based synthesis and characterization of Cu2ZnSnS4 nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 12054–12055. 10.1021/ja9044168View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu XT, Zhuang ZB, Peng Q, Li YD: Wurtzite Cu2ZnSnS4 nanocrystals: a novel quaternary semiconductor. Chem Commun 2011, 47: 3141–3143. 10.1039/c0cc05064dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu MX, Lin X, Hagfeldt A, Ma TL: Low-cost molybdenum carbide and tungsten carbide counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 2011, 50: 3520–3524. 10.1002/anie.201006635View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Gong F, Wang H, Xu X, Zhou G, Wang ZS: In situ growth of Co0.85Se and Ni0.85Se on conductive substrates as high-performance counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134: 10953–10958. 10.1021/ja303034wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Roy-Mayhew JD, Bozym DJ, Punckt C, Aksay IA: Functionalized graphene as a catalytic counter electrode in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 6203–6211. 10.1021/nn1016428View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Papageorgiou N: Counter-electrode function in nanocrystalline photoelectrochemical cell configurations. Coord Chem Rev 2004, 248: 1421–1446. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Li GR, Wang F, Jiang QW, Gao XP, Shen PW: Carbon nanotubes with titanium nitride as a low-cost counter-electrode material for dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010, 49: 3653–3656. 10.1002/anie.201000659View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu MX, Lin X, Wang YD, Wang L, Guo W, Qi DD, Peng XJ, Hagfeldt A, Grätzel M, Ma TL: Economical Pt-free catalysts for counter electrodes of dye-sensitized solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134: 3419–3428. 10.1021/ja209657vView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang YD, Wu MX, Lin X, Shi ZC, Hagfeldt A, Ma TL: Several highly efficient catalysts for Pt-free and FTO-free counter electrodes of dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 4009–4014. 10.1039/c2jm15182kView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kong et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.