Open Access

Synthesis, microstructure, and magnetic properties of monosized Mn x Zn y Fe3 − xyO4 ferrite nanocrystals

  • Hayoung Yoon1,
  • Ji Sung Lee1,
  • Ji Hyun Min1,
  • JunHua Wu2 and
  • Young Keun Kim1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20138:530

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-530

Received: 28 September 2013

Accepted: 9 December 2013

Published: 17 December 2013

Abstract

We report the synthesis and characterization of ferrite nanocrystals which exhibit high crystallinity and narrow size distributions. The three types of samples including Zn ferrite, Mn ferrite, and Mn-Zn ferrite were prepared via a non-aqueous nanoemulsion method. The structural, chemical, and magnetic properties of the nanocrystals are analyzed by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, and physical property measurement system. The characterization indicates that the three types of ferrite nanocrystals were successfully produced, which show well-behaved magnetic properties, ferrimagnetism at 5 K and superparamagnetism at 300 K, respectively. In addition, the magnetization value of the ferrites increases with the increasing concentration of Mn.

Ferrite Nanocrystal Nanoemulsion Ferrimagnetism Superparamagnetism
61.46. + w 75.20.-g 75.50.Gg

Background

Ferrite nanocrystals have been interestingly studied due to their tunable and remarkable magnetic properties such as superparamagnetism [13], as well as catalytic properties not existing in the corresponding bulk materials [4, 5]. There have been extensive investigations on ferrite nanocrystals for potential applications in magnetic storage, ferrofluid technology, and biomedical fields from drug delivery, hyperthermia treatments, to magnetic resonance imaging [610].

A ferrite has the spinel structure basically constructed from face-centered cubic lattices formed by oxygen ions and assumes a general formula described as (M2+1 − δFe3+δ)tet[M2+δFe3+2 − δ]octO4[11]. The element M in the formula can be a transition metal, like Mn, Co, and Zn. Moreover, the round and square brackets indicate the tetrahedral site (A site) and octahedral site (B site) created by oxygen ions, respectively. The subscription, δ, in the range from 0 to 1, represents the inversion parameter of the spinel structure. The parameter could be adjusted in terms of various factors, for example, synthesis methods, particle size, and heat treatments [1218]. The ferrimagnetism of the ferrite is originated from the exchange energy between the A and B sites (A-B interaction) which is larger than other interactions (A-A, B-B). Since the A-B interaction has a negative value, the ions located in both sites have antiparallel orientations; consequently the net moments between both sites result in ferrimagnetism [1923]. Therefore, possible variation of ion arrangements in the lattices may affect the magnetic properties of the ferrite.

In this study, we report the synthesis and characterization of Mn x Zn y Fe3 − xyO4 ferrite nanocrystals, i.e., x = 0, y = 0.9 for Zn ferrite, x = 0.6, y = 0 for Mn ferrite, and x = 0.315, y = 0.45 for Mn-Zn ferrite via a nanoemulsion method. The structure, chemical, and magnetic properties of the nanocrystals were comparatively analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy, and physical property measurement system (PPMS).

Methods

The ferrite nanocrystals of the three types were synthesized by the nanoemulsion method with a biocompatible polymer [24, 25]. The synthesis was performed by thermal decomposition of precursors including iron(III) acetylacetonate, manganese(II) acetylacetonate, and zinc(II) acetylacetonate hydrate. In the case of the Zn ferrite, the iron and zinc precursors were added at a molar ratio of 2:1. In the same manner, the iron and manganese precursors were added at a ratio of 2:1 for the Mn ferrite, while for the Mn-Zn ferrite, the iron, manganese, and zinc precursors were added at a ratio of 4:1:1. 1,2-Hexadecanediol and octyl ether were used as the reductant and the solvent, respectively. The completion of the reactions was achieved in the nanoreactors formed by poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (PEO-PPO-PEO) polymer surfactant. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, Missouri, USA), except for octyl ether (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The mixture was first heated to 120°C for 1 ~ 2 h, and then the temperature was raised rapidly to 280°C for refluxing. After 1 h of refluxing, the solution was air-cooled and washed with ethanol several times. The washed solution was subsequently centrifuged to precipitate the nanocrystals.

The crystal structures, particle sizes, and shapes of the nanocrystals were investigated by XRD (D/MAX-2500 V/PC; Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and TEM (JEM-2100 F; JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) including high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), while the chemical compositions of the nanocrystals were determined by an energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) system in TEM and XRF (S2 PICOFOX; Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). In addition, the magnetic behaviors of the nanocrystals were analyzed by a PPMS (Quantum Design Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Results and discussion

The reactions were completed through the thermal decomposition of the appropriate precursors in the nanoreactors formed by the polymer molecules, resulting in high-quality nanoparticles as desired [24]. The use of the polymer, PEO-PPO-PEO, is distinctive, which has many merits and broad applications. In particular, the polymer is bio-friendly [25] and has an amphiphilic property [24], so the synthesized nanoparticles can be well dispersed in an aqueous solution without any additional surface modifications, which is especially benign for biomedical purposes [24].

The TEM images in Figure 1a,b,c show the morphologies and particle sizes of the ferrite nanocrystals. In the images, the nanocrystals appear almost spherically shaped and monosized. The size distributions of the nanocrystals were obtained by size counting from the relevant TEM images, which were fitted well by Gaussian distributions, giving an averaged diameter and standard deviation of 7.4 ± 0.7 nm for Zn ferrite, 7.1 ± 0.9 nm for Mn ferrite, and 6.2 ± 0.8 nm for Mn-Zn ferrite, respectively. Figure 1d,e,f displays the HRTEM images for the corresponding ferrite nanocrystals showing highly crystalline characteristics. The individual lattices in the images are separately indexed to the projected (220) and (311) planes of the cubic spinel structure of ferrites.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-530/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1781_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

TEM analysis of the ferrite nanocrystals. TEM images of (a) Zn ferrite, (b) Mn ferrite, and (c) Mn-Zn ferrite. HRTEM images of (d) Zn ferrite, (e) Mn ferrite, and (f) Mn-Zn ferrite.

The structural information on the nanocrystals is further acquired by XRD analysis. Figure 2 illustrates the XRD patterns of the three types of the ferrite nanocrystals. All XRD diffractions show the typical peaks of the spinel structure, such as (220), (311), and (400), without any other unexpected peaks from by-products like MnO, ZnO, or other metal oxide forms. The results clearly indicate that all nanocrystals were properly synthesized in ferrite forms. Moreover, it is observable that the peaks in the XRD patterns are shifted to lower angles slightly as the concentration of Zn increases. For example, the positions of the (311) peaks are 35.41° for Mn ferrite, 35.28° for Mn-Zn ferrite, and 35.23° for Zn ferrite, separately. According to the Bragg's law, the reduced angle of the diffraction peaks originated from the increased lattice spacing. In fact, a Zn2+ ion has the radius of 0.88 Å, which is larger than the radius of an Fe2+ ion (0.75 Å) and Mn2+ ion (0.81 Å), so the increasing of Zn2+ ion substitution leads to the expansion of the lattice spacing. Consequently, the phenomenon as observed above corroborates that the Zn2+ and Mn2+ ions were successfully doped in the relevant ferrite nanocrystals.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-530/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1781_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

XRD diffraction patterns for the ferrite nanocrystals. (a) Zn ferrite, (b) Mn-Zn ferrite, and (c) Mn ferrite.

Table 1 summarizes the chemical compositions of the ferrite nanocrystals analyzed by XRF and TEM-EDS. The XRF data report the atomic ratio of the nanocrystals in a large quantity, while the EDS data present the composition of a singular particle. Nonetheless, both data show a close match in the chemical composition. Compared with the precursor ratios, the XRF and EDS data reveal no substantial difference of Zn and Mn of the resultant nanocrystals from the one designed originally. Thus, the composition formulas are described as Zn0.9Fe2.1O4 for Zn ferrite, Mn0.6Fe2.4O4 for Mn ferrite, and Mn0.3Zn0.5Fe2.2O4 for Mn-Zn ferrite.
Table 1

Chemical compositions of the ferrite nanocrystals

  

Precursor molar ratio

XRF (at.%)

EDS (at.%)

Zn ferrite

Fe

2

71.3

70.9

Zn

1

28.7

29.1

Mn ferrite

Fe

2

77.7

79.7

Mn

1

22.3

20.3

Mn-Zn ferrite

Fe

4

74.4

78.6

Zn

1

15.2

11.8

Mn

1

10.4

9.6

Figure 3a,b records the hysteresis curves obtained from PPMS at 5 and 300 K, respectively. At 5 K, the ferrite nanocrystals show ferrimagnetic behavior with a coercivity of about 300 Oe and the corresponding magnetizations at 30 kOe are 47.4 emu/g for Zn ferrite, 55.7 emu/g for Mn-Zn ferrite, and 62.5 emu/g for Mn ferrite, separately. At 300 K, the nanocrystals become superparamagnetic because of size effects and thermal fluctuations. The inset of Figure 3b reveals the coercivities of all nanocrystals less than 10 Oe. Moreover, the magnetizations of the nanocrystals at 30 kOe are reduced to 30.4 emu/g for Zn ferrite, 37.5 emu/g for Mn-Zn ferrite, and 47.6 emu/g for Mn ferrite, owing to the thermal effects. From the outcomes, it is obvious that the increase of the Mn concentration leads to the increase of the magnetization value. The change in magnetization due to the compositional change may be explained simply by the different moments of the ions, 5 μB of Mn2+ ions which are higher than 4 μB of Fe2+ ions, in turn 0 μB of Zn2+ ions. Other factors such as the inversion parameter in the spinel structure may be considered for comprehensive elaboration of the mechanism. It is useful to remark that the inversion parameter is generally measured by extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analysis or Mössbauer spectroscopy [26, 27].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-530/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1781_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Magnetic analysis of the ferrite nanocrystals. (a) M-H hysteresis curves at 5 K and (b) 300 K.

Furthermore, the temperature dependence of magnetization was recorded in Figure 4 from 5 to 400 K under the applied magnetic field of 100 Oe by the zero-field-cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling (FC) modes. The M-T curves evidently manifest the superparamagnetic behavior of the ferrite nanocrystals. Overall, the magnetization of the nanocrystals in the FC mode decreases gradually as the temperature increases. In the case of the ZFC mode, the magnetic moment of the nanocrystals is frozen to almost zero at the low temperature. With the increasing temperature, the magnetization increases until the blocking temperature (TB) then decreases like the FC mode. The measured TB of the ferrite nanocrystals are 80 K for Mn ferrite, 56 K for Mn-Zn ferrite, and 66 K for Zn ferrite, respectively.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-530/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1781_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

ZFC-FC curves under the magnetic field of 100 Oe for the ferrite nanocrystals.

Conclusions

We have synthesized the ferrite nanocrystals which exhibit high crystallinity and narrow size distributions via the non-aqueous nanoemulsion method and compared three types of samples from Zn ferrite, Mn ferrite, to Mn-Zn ferrites. The structural and chemical measurements performed by XRD and XRF indicated that the ferrite nanocrystals were successfully produced. All samples behave ferrimagnetically at 5 K and superparamagnetically at 300 K, individually. As the concentration of Mn increases, the magnetization value of the ferrites increases. Furthermore, the M-T curves obtained by the ZFC-FC modes clearly substantiate the superparamagnetism of the ferrite nanocrystals.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported through the National Research Foundation of Korea which is funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2010-0017950, NRF-2011-0002128).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea University
(2)
Pioneer Research Center for Biomedical Nanocrystals, Korea University

References

  1. Misra RDK, Gubbala S, Kale A, Egelhoff WF: A comparison of the magnetic characteristics of nanocrystalline nickel, zinc, and manganese ferrites synthesized by reverse micelle technique. Mat Sci Eng B-Solid 2004, 111: 164–174. 10.1016/j.mseb.2004.04.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Carta D, Casula MF, Floris P, Falqui A, Mountjoy G, Boni A, Sangregorio C, Corrias A: Synthesis and microstructure of manganese ferrite colloidal nanocrystals. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010, 12: 5074–5083. 10.1039/b922646jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jeong J, Min JH, Song AY, Lee JS, Ju JS, Wu JH, Kim YK: Nonaqueous synthesis and magnetic properties of ZnFe2O4 nanocrystals with narrow size distributions. J Appl Phys 2011, 109: 07B511.Google Scholar
  4. Mathew DS, Juang RS: An overview of the structure and magnetism of spinel ferrite nanoparticles and their synthesis in microemulsions. Chem Eng J 2007, 129: 51–65. 10.1016/j.cej.2006.11.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Carta D, Casula MF, Falqui A, Loche D, Mountjoy G, Sangregorio C, Corrias A: A structural and magnetic investigation of the inversion degree in ferrite nanocrystals MFe2O4 (M = Mn, Co, Ni). J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 8606–8615. 10.1021/jp901077cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Concas G, Spano G, Cannas C, Musinu A, Peddis D, Piccaluga G: Inversion degree and saturation magnetization of different nanocrystalline cobalt ferrites. J Magn Magn Mater 2009, 321: 1893–1897. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.12.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Siddique M, Butt NM: Effect of particle size on degree of inversion in ferrites investigated by Mossbauer spectroscopy. Physica B 2010, 405: 4211–4215. 10.1016/j.physb.2010.07.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jun YW, Lee JH, Cheon J: Chemical design of nanoparticle probes for high-performance magnetic resonance imaging. Angew Chem Int Edit 2008, 47: 5122–5135. 10.1002/anie.200701674View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee Y, Lee J, Bae CJ, Park JG, Noh HJ, Park JH, Hyeon T: Large-scale synthesis of uniform and crystalline magnetite nanoparticles using reverse micelles as nanoreactors under reflux conditions. Adv Funct Mater 2005, 15: 503–509. See also correction by authors. Adv Funct Mater 2005, 15: 2036–2036 See also correction by authors. Adv Funct Mater 2005, 15:2036–2036 10.1002/adfm.200400187View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Nalbandian L, Delimitis A, Zaspalis VT, Deliyanni EA, Bakoyannakis DN, Peleka EN: Hydrothermally prepared nanocrystalline Mn–Zn ferrites: synthesis and characterization. Microporous and Mesoporous Mater 2008, 114: 465–473. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.01.034View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sickafus KE, Wills JM, Grimes NW: Structure of spinel. J Am Ceram Soc 1999, 82: 3279–3292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamdeh HH, Ho JC, Oliver SA, Willey RJ, Oliveri G, Busca G: Magnetic properties of partially-inverted zinc ferrite aerogel powders. J Appl Phys 1997, 81: 1851–1857. 10.1063/1.364068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofmann M, Campbell SJ, Ehrhardt H, Feyerherm R: The magnetic behaviour of nanostructured zinc ferrite. J Mater Sci 2004, 39: 5057–5065.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mahmoud MH, Hamdeh HH, Abdel-Mageed AI, Abdallah AM, Fayek MK: Effect of HEBM on the cation distribution of Mn-ferrite. Physica B 2000, 291: 49–53. 10.1016/S0921-4526(99)01381-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ammar S, Jouini N, Fievet F, Beji Z, Smiri L, Moline P, Danot M, Greneche JM: Magnetic properties of zinc ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by hydrolysis in a polyol medium. J Phys-Condens Mat 2006, 18: 9055–9069. 10.1088/0953-8984/18/39/032View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Sepelak V, Becker KD: Comparison of the cation inversion parameter of the nanoscale milled spinel ferrites with that of the quenched bulk materials. Mat Sci Eng a-Struct 2004, 375: 861–864.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhenyu L, Guangliang X, Yalin Z: Microwave assisted low temperature synthesis of MnZn ferrite nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett 2007, 2: 40–43. 10.1007/s11671-006-9027-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Batoo KM, Ansari MS: Low temperature-fired Ni-Cu-Zn ferrite nanoparticles through auto-combustion method for multilayer chip inductor applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 112–126. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-112View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Cullity BD, Graham CD: Introduction to Magnetic Materials. 2nd edition. New Jersey: Wiley; 2009.Google Scholar
  20. Makovec D, Kodre A, Arcon I, Drofenik M: Structure of manganese zinc ferrite spinel nanoparticles prepared with co-precipitation in reversed microemulsions. J Nanopart Res 2009, 11: 1145–1158. 10.1007/s11051-008-9510-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang J, Zeng C, Peng ZM, Chen QW: Synthesis and magnetic properties of Zn1 −xMn x Fe2O4 nanoparticles. Physica B 2004, 349: 124–128. 10.1016/j.physb.2004.02.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Smart JS: The Néel theory of ferrimagnetism. Am J Phys 1955, 23: 356–370. 10.1119/1.1934006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hochepied JF, Bonville P, Pileni MP: Nonstoichiometric zinc ferrite nanocrystals: syntheses and unusual magnetic properties. J Phys Chem B 2000, 104: 905–912. 10.1021/jp991626iView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu HL, Wu J, Min JH, Hou P, Song AY, Kim YK: Non-aqueous synthesis of water-dispersible Fe3O4-Ca3(PO4)2 core-shell nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2011, 22: 055701. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/5/055701View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cho NH, Cheong TC, Min JH, Wu JH, Lee SJ, Kim D, Yang JS, Kim S, Kim YK, Seong SY: A multifunctional core-shell nanoparticle for dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Nat Nanotechnol 2011, 6: 675–682. 10.1038/nnano.2011.149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang A, Chinnasamy CN, Greneche JM, Chen YJ, Yoon SD, Chen ZH, Hsu KL, Cai ZH, Ziemer K, Vittoria C, Harris VG: Enhanced Neel temperature in Mn ferrite nanoparticles linked to growth-rate-induced cation inversion. Nanotechnology 2009, 20: 185704. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/18/185704View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Choi EH, Ahn Y, Song KC: Mossbauer study in zinc ferrite nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 2006, 301: 171–174. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.06.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yoon et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.