Open Access

One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of Mn3O4 nanorods grown on Ni foam for high performance supercapacitor applications

  • Dongwei Li1,
  • Fanhui Meng1,
  • Xiuling Yan1, 2,
  • Lishan Yang3,
  • Hua Heng1 and
  • Ye Zhu1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20138:535

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-535

Received: 12 November 2013

Accepted: 6 December 2013

Published: 19 December 2013


Mn3O4/Ni foam composites were synthesized by a one-step hydrothermal method in an aqueous solution containing only Mn(NO3)2 and C6H12N4. It was found that Mn3O4 nanorods with lengths of 2 to 3 μm and diameters of 100 nm distributed on Ni foam homogeneously. Detailed reaction time-dependent morphological and component evolution was studied to understand the growth process of Mn3O4 nanorods. As cathode material for supercapacitors, Mn3O4 nanorods/composite exhibited superior supercapacitor performances with high specific capacitance (263 F · g-1 at 1A · g-1), which was more than 10 times higher than that of the Mn3O4/Ni plate. The enhanced supercapacitor performance was due to the porous architecture of the Ni foam which provides fast ion and electron transfer, large reaction surface area, and good conductivity.


Manganese oxide Ni foam Nanorod Hydrothermal synthesis Supercapacitor


Pseudocapacitors, based on reversible redox reactions at/near the surface of the electrode, represent one type of supercapacitors having the potential for high energy densities [13]. As is known, the excellent electrode should primarily meet the following key requirements: (1) a large number of electroactive sites, (2) high transport rates of both electrolyte ions and electrons, and (3) high electronic conductivity [4]. Among various pseudocapacitor electrode materials, RuO2 has been extensively studied because of its ultrahigh theoretical capacitance (2,000 F · g-1 in a wide potential window of 1.4 V), a nearly metallic electrical conductivity and excellent chemical stability [5]. However, RuO2 has the drawbacks of high cost and toxicity. Therefore, extensive efforts have been made to search for alternative materials, such as Ni, Co, or Mn-based oxides/hydroxides [69]. Because the energy density of a supercapacitor is proportional to the square of the cell voltage, the energy density of Ni- and Co-related materials is limited by the narrow potential window [10].

Mn3O4 is a potentially interesting electrode material for electrolytic supercapacitors due to its low cost, non-toxicity, environmental compatibility, and intrinsically high capacity [11, 12]. However, the capacitance property of Mn3O4 has been rarely investigated because of its poor electronic conductivity. A common strategy with poor electronic conductors is to combine them into composites with conducting substrates such as nanoporous gold, various carbon materials, and Ni foam [13, 14]. Ni foam, as a commercial material with high electronic conductivity and a desirable three-dimensional (3D) structure is widely used as the electrode substrate material [15, 16]. It would not only reduce the diffusion resistance of electrolytes but also provide a large surface area for loading active material. There have been some reports on the synthesis of Ni- and Co-based oxides/hydroxides on Ni foam [1720]. However, there are very few reports on the fabrication of Mn-based oxides/hydroxides on Ni foam, except for the MnO2/CNT/Ni foam electrode [21, 22]. To the best of our knowledge, one-pot hydrothermal synthesis of Mn3O4 nanorods structures on Ni foam has not been reported.

Here, we report facile direct synthesis of Mn3O4 nanorods on Ni foam with diameters of about 100 nm and lengths of 2 to 3 μm via one-pot hydrothermal process, without any additional surfactant. The extraordinary redox activity of the Mn3O4/Ni foam composite is demonstrated in terms of pseudocapacitive performance. The effect of reaction time on the crystal growth mechanism and supercapacitor performance of the Mn3O4/Ni foam is well discussed.



Hexamethylene tetramine (C6H12N4) and Mn(NO3)2 (50%) solution were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Company (Shanghai, China), while Ni foam (5 g/100 cm2) was purchased from Changsha Liyuan New Material Co., Ltd. (Changsha, China). All reagents used in this experiment were of analytical grade without further purification. The Ni foam was immersed in concentrated hydrochloric acid for 10 min and then washed with acetone, ethanol, and distilled water several times before use.

Synthesis of samples

In a typical procedure, 3 mL Mn(NO3)2 (50%) solution and 2 g C6H12N4 were dissolved in 17 mL distilled water. After vigorously stirring, the resulting solution and the pre-cleaned Ni foam were transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless autoclave. The autoclave was sealed at 120°C for 10 h and then cooled to room temperature naturally. The products were washed with distilled water several times, and finally dried in a vacuum desiccator at 50°C. The deposit weight of Mn3O4 was accurately determined by calculating the weight difference between the Ni foam coated with Mn3O4 after the hydrothermal process and the Ni foam before the hydrothermal process.


The morphology of samples was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-6700 F, Akishima-shi, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. The obtained samples were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) on a Bruker D8 advanced X-ray diffractometer (Madison, WI, USA) with Cu Ka radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) at a scan rate of 0.02° · s-1. Raman spectra were obtained using LabRAM HR UV/vis/near-IR spectrometer (Kyoto, Japan) with an argon-ion continuous-wave laser (514.5 nm) as the excitation source.

The electrochemical measurements were performed in a standard three-electrode cell on a CHI 760D potentiostat at room temperature, where 1 cm2 (1 × 1 cm) of the obtained composite was used as the working electrode, a Pt plate was chosen as the counter electrode and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was selected as the reference electrode. A 4-M NaOH solution was used as the electrolyte.

Results and discussions

Component characterization

To examine the phase composition and structure of the samples, XRD analysis was carried out and the pattern is shown in Figure 1a. The as-prepared sample displays typical hausmannite Mn3O4 diffraction lines, which is in agreement with JCPDS card 18–0803. The peaks at around 44° and 52° are indexed to the Ni planes (111) and (200) of the Ni foam substrate, respectively. This result indicates that the utilized hydrothermal conditions are favorable for the formation of pure Mn3O4. Moreover, the XRD peaks are relatively broad, indicating that the crystals constituting the products are small in size. Raman spectra can be used to gain more information about structure (Figure 1b). Consistent with the XRD data, the peak at 652.3 cm-1 corresponding to the crystalline Mn3O4 structure are clearly observed [23].
Figure 1

XRD pattern (a) and Raman spectra (b) of Mn 3 O 4 /Ni foam composite.

Morphology characterization

The photographs of the Ni foam (a) and the Mn3O4/Ni foam composite (b) are shown in Figure 2. The Ni foam turns to brown color after hydrothermal reaction, suggesting the formation of Mn3O4 on the Ni foam. The SEM image at low magnification shows that the pristine Ni foam has a 3D porous structure (Figure 3a). This porous skeleton of Ni foam would provide effective electrolyte accessible channels for ion transportation, and shorten the distance for ion diffusion. Figure 3b,c,d shows SEM images of the Mn3O4/Ni foam composite at different magnifications. These images show highly dense nanorods on Ni foam substrate. The individual nanorod is approximately 100 nm and approximately 2 to 3 μm in diameter and length, respectively, and the aspect ratio is greater than 20 in most cases.
Figure 2

Digital photographs of (a) the Ni foam and (b) Mn 3 O 4 /Ni foam composite.
Figure 3

SEM images of (a) the 3D structure of Ni foam and (b,c,d) Mn 3 O 4 /Ni foam composite with different magnifications.

Electrochemical capacitance of Mn3O4/Ni foam electrode

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charging-discharging measurements were performed to evaluate the electrochemical properties and quantify the specific capacitance of the Mn3O4/Ni foam composite. The CV curves of the composite at different scan rates between 5 and 20 mV · s-1 are presented in Figure 4a. Different from an ideal rectangular shape of the typical electrical double-layer capacitance, the redox reaction peaks indicate that the capacitance mainly results from the pseudocapacitive capacitance [24]. The pseudocapacitance arises from the reaction between the Mn4+ ions and NaOH electrolyte [25, 26]. The peak current increases when the scan rate increases from 5 to 20 mV · s–1, while the anodic peaks shift toward the positive potential and cathodic peaks shift toward the negative potential, which demonstrates the quasi-reversible nature of the redox couples [27, 28].
Figure 4

CV and charging-discharging curves, corresponding specific capacitance, and capacitance retention of Mn 3 O 4 /Ni foam electrode. (a) CV curves of the Mn3O4/Ni foam electrode at different scanning rates. (b) Charging-discharging curves of the Mn3O4/Ni foam electrode at different current densities. (c) The corresponding specific capacitance as a function of current density. (d) Capacitance retention of the Mn3O4/Ni foam electrode as a function of cycle number. The insert shows the charging-discharging profiles of the first ten cycles recorded with a current density of 1 A · g-1.

The charging-discharging curves of the Mn3O4/Ni foam were measured at various current densities (shown in Figure 4b). The specific capacitance was calculated according to the following equation:
C = i × Δ t ΔV

where C (F · g-1) is the specific capacitance; i (A · g-1) is the discharge current density, Δt (s) is the discharge time, and ΔV (V) is the discharge potential range. The specific capacitance values of the Mn3O4/Ni foam composite evaluated from the discharge curves are 293, 263, 234, 214, and 186 F · g-1 at the current density of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 5 A · g-1, respectively (Figure 4c). The significant capacitance decrease with increasing discharge current density is likely to be caused by the increase of potential drop due to electrode resistance and the relatively insufficient Faradic redox reaction of the Mn3O4/Ni foam composite under higher discharge current densities. It is noteworthy that the specific capacitance of the as-prepared Mn3O4/Ni foam composite is higher than of the previously reported Mn3O4 in other forms, i.e., Ma et al. reported a specific capacitance of 130 F · g-1 (in 1 M Na2SO4 electrolyte at a current density of 1 A · g-1) for Mn3O4/graphene nanocomposites prepared by a one-step solvothermal process [29], and Wang et al. reported a specific capacitance of 159 F · g-1 (in 6 M KOH electrolyte at a scan rate of 5 mV · s-1) for Mn3O4/graphene synthesized by mixing graphene suspension in ethylene glycol with MnO2 organosol [30]. The high capacitance of the as-prepared Mn3O4/Ni foam composite can be attributed to the positive synergistic effects between Mn3O4 and Ni foam. The skeleton of Ni foam could reduce the aggregation of the Mn3O4 nanorods, making the Mn3O4 nanorod accessible for electronic and ionic transport pathways and enhancing the utilization of the active materials. Furthermore, Ni foam also provides a highly conductive network for electron transport during the charge and discharge processes.

The endurance test was conducted using galvanostatic charging-discharging cycles at 1 A · g-1 (insert of Figure 4d). The discharge capacitance loss after 2,000 consecutive cycles is about 20%. The specific capacitance degradation is estimated to be from 263 to 205 F · g-1 (Figure 4d). Although the Ni foam serves as a conductive matrix to promote fast Faradaic charging and discharging of the Mn3O4 nanorods, its loose structure leads to the flaking off of the nanorods from the Ni foam substrate.

Time-dependent Mn3O4/Ni foam composite properties

To shed light on the formation process, temporal evolution of the Mn3O4 nanostructures was studied by examining the products obtained under different reaction times of 1, 4, and 8 h. XRD patterns and Raman spectra were measured to identify the components of the different samples. The XRD patterns of the composite obtained under 1 h can be indexed to MnO2 and Mn3O4 crystal structures (Figure 5a). For the composites obtained under 4 and 8 h, the intense XRD peak at 2θ ≈ 19°disappeared corresponding to the MnO2 (200) crystal structures and the left peaks attribute to the Mn3O4 crystal structures. Figure 5b shows the Raman spectra of the powder scratched from composite electrodes. The peak position of composites obtained under 4 and 8 h are red shifted compared with that of the composite obtained under 1 h. As is known, the Raman spectra for the MnO2 phase and the Mn3O4 phase are located at 638.5 cm-1 and 652.5 cm-1, respectively [31]. Therefore, this red shift of Raman spectra indicates the component variation from the MnO2 phase to Mn3O4, which is in excellent agreement with the result obtained from the XRD study. The SEM images of products obtained under different reaction times of 1, 4, and 8 h are shown in Figure 6. The products collected after 1 h consisted of nanosheets with a thickness of about 30 nm (Figure 6a,b). When the reaction time increases to 4 h, some nanorods accompanied with nanoparticles begin to appear (Figure 6c,d). As the reaction proceeds to 8 h, the nanosheets disappeared and all of the products are nanorods with few nanoparticles (Figure 6e,f). After 10 h of the hydrothermal reaction, well-defined nanorods are obtained (Figure 3c,d). Based on the time-dependent morphology evolution described above, the formation mechanism of Mn3O4 nanorods can be proposed. At the initial stage, a large number of nanocrystallites nucleate and grow into nanosheets to minimize the overall energy of the system. However, the nanosheets are just intermediate products and not stable. After the reaction for 4 h, some of the nanosheets dissolve with the emergence of nanorods with some nanoparticles. When the reaction proceeds for 8 h, all of the nanosheets have transformed into nanorods with nanoparticles. This suggests that the dissolution of nanosheets and the growth of nanorods occur simultaneously during the hydrothermal reaction. Further increase of the reaction time results in the development of well-defined and uniform nanorods without any impurity.
Figure 5

XRD pattern (a) and Raman spectra (b) of the powder scratched from composite electrode after different reaction time.
Figure 6

SEM images of composite obtained after different reaction times. (a,b) 1 h; (c,d) 4 h; (e,f) 8 h.

The electrochemical properties of products obtained under different reaction time were studied in 4 M NaOH solution. Figure 7a shows the CV curves of the products at a scan rate of 20 mV · s-1. As the reaction time increases from 1 to 8 h, the redox current density increases. The product obtained under 8 h may show the best capacitive behavior of the three products because the specific capacitance increases with the current density at the same scan rate. Figure 7b depicts the specific capacitance of the products under different reaction time at scan rates between 5 and 50 mV · s-1. All of them show that the specific capacitance gradually decreases as the scan rate increases, which can be attributed to the diffusion limitations in pore [22]. Obviously, the product obtained at 8 h has the highest specific capacitance, consistent with the CV tests in Figure 7a. The discharge curve of the composite obtained under 8 h displays a longer plateau than that of 1 and 4 h at 1 A · g-1 (Figure 7c). It is known that the increase of the charging time represents the higher capacitance at a fixed discharge current density. The dependence of the specific capacitance on the current density is compared in Figure 7d. The specific capacitance of the composite obtained at 1 h is 44, 39, 35, 31, and 27 F · g-1 at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 5 A · g-1, respectively. For current densities beyond 5 A · g-1, the iR drop is too large to permit an accurate calculation of the specific capacitance. In contrast, the specific capacitance of the composite obtained at 8 h is 232, 206, 183, 167, and 147 F · g-1 at the corresponding current densities. Combined with the curve in Figure 4b, the composite obtained at 10 h exhibits the highest specific capacitance. The increase in the specific capacitance can be attributed to the unique structure of the composite, and a longer period of reaction time leads to closer contact between the Ni foam substrate and the active material. Similar phenomena were also observed at the nanostructured Ni(OH)2/Ni foam whose specific capacitance reached the highest after the longest reaction time [32].
Figure 7

Supercapacitive properties of composite obtained after different reaction times (1, 4, and 8 h). (a) CV curves recorded in 4 M NaOH solution at 20 mV · s-1; (b) corresponding specific capacitance as a function of scan rate; (c) charging-discharging curves at 1 A · g-1current density; (d) corresponding specific capacitance as a function of current density.

Electrochemical capacitance of Mn3O4/Ni plate electrode- comparison with Mn3O4/Ni foam

As is known, the substrate is important to pseudocapacitor electrode materials. To investigate the electrochemical capacitance of the composite as a function of the substrate, control experiment was conducted using the Ni plate instead of the Ni foam for Mn3O4 growth under the same condition. Figure 8a shows the charging-discharging curves of the Mn3O4/Ni plate measured at different current densities. Compared with the curve in Figure 4b, the decrease in the charging time represents the lower capacitance of the Mn3O4/Ni plate. The specific capacitances of the Mn3O4/Ni plate are 27, 24, 21, and 19.6 F · g-1 at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 A · g-1, respectively (Figure 8b). The specific capacitance of the Mn3O4/Ni foam is more than 10 times higher than that of the Mn3O4/Ni plate. The Ni foam substrate with microholes and zigzag flow channels results in excellent mass transport property and large surface area per unit volume of the electrode.
Figure 8

Charging-discharging curves of Mn 3 O 4 /Ni plate electrode (a) and corresponding specific capacitancesas a function of current density (b). (a) Curves are measured at different current densities.


A facile one-step hydrothermal method was successfully developed to synthesize Mn3O4 nanorods on Ni foam. The complete absence of any surfactant enabled the product to have high purity. The formation process was proposed to include the dissolution of nanosheets, followed by the formation of uniform nanorods. The obtained Mn3O4 nanorods have diameters of about 100 nm and lengths of 2 to 3 μm. A high specific capacitance of 263 F · g-1 has been achieved for the Mn3O4/Ni foam at 1 A · g-1, which is higher than that of the Mn3O4 composite on other substrates. Porosity may enhance the electrolyte/Mn3O4 contact area and shorten the electrolyte diffusion length in the nanostructures. The cost-effective fabrication and remarkably high specific capacitance provide great potential for this type of hybrid nanostructure to be used as an active electrode for supercapacitor application.



This work was sponsored by the National Science Foundation of China (51171092), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20090131110019) and the Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University (2012HW004).

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University
School of Chemistry and Bioscience, Ili Normal University
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University


  1. Zhang JT, Zhao XS: On the configuration of supercapacitors for maximizing electrochemical performance. Chem Sus Chem 2012, 5: 818–841. 10.1002/cssc.201100571View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim JH, Zhu K, Yan Y, Perkins CL, Frank AJ: Microstructure and pseudocapacitive properties of electrodes constructed of oriented NiO-TiO2nanotube arrays. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 4099–4104. 10.1021/nl102203sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu JP, Jiang J, Bosmanc M, Fan HJ: Three-dimensional tubular arrays of MnO2-NiO nanoplates with high areal pseudocapacitance. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 2419–2426. 10.1039/c1jm14804dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yuan CZ, Li JY, Hou LR, Zhang XG, Shen LF, Lou XW: Ultrathin mesoporous NiCo2O4nanosheets supported on Ni foam as advanced electrodes for supercapacitors. Adv Funct Mater 2012, 22: 4592–4597. 10.1002/adfm.201200994View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhao X, Sánchez BM, Dobson PJ, Grant PS: The role of nanomaterials in redox-based supercapacitors for next generation energy storage devices. Nanoscale 2011, 3: 839–855. 10.1039/c0nr00594kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim SI, Lee JS, Ahn HJ, Song HK, Jang JH: Facile route to an efficient NiO supercapacitor with a three-dimensional nanonetwork morphology. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013, 5: 1596–1603. 10.1021/am3021894View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang HL, Casalongue HS, Liang YY, Dai HJ: Ni(OH)2nanoplates grown on graphene as advanced electrochemical pseudocapacitor materials. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132: 7472–7477. 10.1021/ja102267jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong XC, Xu H, Wang XW, Huang YX, Chan-Park MB, Zhang H, Wang LH, Huang W, Chen P: 3D graphene-cobalt oxide electrode for high-performance supercapacitor and enzymeless glucose detection. ACS Nano 2012, 6: 3206–3213. 10.1021/nn300097qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Meng FH, Yan XL, Zhu Y, Si PC: Controllable synthesis of MnO2/polyaniline nanocomposite and its electrochemical capacitive property. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 179. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-179View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee GW, Hall AS, Kim J-D, Mallouk TE: A facile and template-free hydrothermal synthesis of Mn3O4nanorods on graphene sheets for supercapacitor electrodes with long cycle stability. Chem Mater 2012, 24: 1158–1164. 10.1021/cm203697wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Xiao W, Xia H, Fuh JYH, Lu L: Growth of single-crystal α-MnO2nanotubes prepared by a hydrothermal route and their electrochemical properties. J Power Sources 2009, 193: 935–938. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.03.073View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dubal DP, Holze R: Self-assembly of stacked layers of Mn3O4nanosheets using a scalable chemical strategy for enhanced, flexible, electrochemical energy storage. J Power Sources 2013, 238: 274–282.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Meng FH, Ding Y: Sub-micrometer-thick all-solid-state supercapacitors with high power and energy densities. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 4098–4102. 10.1002/adma.201101678View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang JT, Jiang JW, Zhao XS: Synthesis and capacitive properties of manganese oxide nanosheets dispersed on functionalized graphene sheets. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 6448–6454. 10.1021/jp200724hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang GL, Huang JC, Chen SL, Gao YY, Cao DX: Preparation and supercapacitance of CuO nanosheet arrays grown on nickel foam. J Power Sources 2011, 196: 5756–5760. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.049View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yu L, Zhang GQ, Yuan CZ, Lou XW: Hierarchical NiCo2O4@MnO2core-shell heterostructured nanowire arrays on Ni foam as high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Comm 2013, 49: 137–139. 10.1039/c2cc37117kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu ZY, Chang Z, Liu JF, Sun XM: Stable ultrahigh specific capacitance of NiO nanorod arrays. Nano Res 2011, 4: 658–665. 10.1007/s12274-011-0121-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang GW, Xu CL, Li HL: Electrodeposited nickel hydroxide on nickel foam with ultrahigh capacitance. Chem Comm 2008, 6537–6539.Google Scholar
  19. Guan C, Liu JP, Cheng CW, Li HX, Li XG, Zhou WW, Zhang H, Fan HJ: Hybrid structure of cobalt monoxide nanowire @ nickel hydroxidenitrate nanoplate aligned on nickel foam for high-rate supercapacitor. Energ Environ Sci 2011, 4: 4496–4499. 10.1039/c1ee01685gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Xia XH, Tu JP, Zhang YQ, Mai YJ, Wang XL, Gu CD, Zhao XB: Three-dimensional porous nano-Ni/Co(OH)2nanoplate composite film: a pseudocapacitive material with superior performance. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 22662–22668. 10.1021/jp208113jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhao DD, Yang Z, Zhang LY, Feng XL, Zhang YF: Electrodeposited manganese oxide on nickel foam-supported carbon nanotubes for electrode of supercapacitors. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 2011, 14: 93–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Li J, Yang QM, Zhitomirsky I: Nickel foam-based manganese dioxide–carbon nanotube composite electrodes for electrochemical supercapacitors. J Power Sources 2008, 185: 1569–1574. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.07.057View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang WZ, Ao L: Synthesis and optical properties of Mn3O4nanowires by decomposing MnCO3nanoparticles in flux. Cryst Growth Des 2008, 8: 358–362. 10.1021/cg070502pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen J, Huang KL, Liu SQ: Insoluble metal hexacyanoferrates as supercapacitor electrodes. Electrochem Commun 2008, 10: 1851–1855. 10.1016/j.elecom.2008.07.046View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang DW, Li YQ, Wang QH, Wang TM: Facile synthesis of porous Mn3O4nanocrystal-graphene nanocomposites for electrochemical supercapacitors. Eur J Inorg Chem 2012, 2012: 628–635. 10.1002/ejic.201100983View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei WF, Cui XW, Chen WX, Ivey DG: Manganese oxide-based materials as electrochemical supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Soc Rev 2011, 40: 1697–1721. 10.1039/c0cs00127aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kong LB, Lang JW, Liu M, Luo YC, Kang L: Facile approach to prepare loose-packed cobalt hydroxide nano-plates materials for electrochemical capacitors. J Power Sources 2009, 194: 1194–1201. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Qing XX, Liu SQ, Huang KL, Lv K, Yang YP, Lu ZG, Fang D, Liang XX: Facile synthesis of Co3O4nanoflowers grown on Ni foam with superior electrochemical performance. Electrochim Acta 2011, 56: 4985–4991. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang X, Sun XZ, Chen Y, Zhang DC, Ma YW: One-step solvothermal synthesis of graphene/Mn3O4nanocomposites and their electrochemical properties for supercapacitors. Mater Lett 2012, 68: 336–339.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang B, Park J, Wang CY, Ahn H, Wang GX: Mn3O4nanoparticles embedded into graphene nanosheets: preparation, characterization, and electrochemical properties for supercapacitors. Electrochim Acta 2010, 55: 6812–6817. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.086View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Xue ZH, Liu ZL, Ma FW, Sun LP, Huo LH, Zhao H: Hydrothermal synthesis of α-MnO2nanorods and their electrochemical performances. Chin J Inorg Chem 2012, 28: 691–697.Google Scholar
  32. Lv S, Suo H, Wang JM, Wang Y, Zhao C, Xing SX: Facile synthesis of nanostructured Ni(OH)2on nickel foam and its electrochemical property. Colloid Surface Physicochem Eng Aspect 2012, 396: 292–298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Li et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.