Natural convection heat transfer of nanofluids along a vertical plate embedded in porous medium
- Ziya Uddin^{1, 2}Email author and
- Souad Harmand^{1, 2}
DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-64
© Uddin and Harmand; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 30 October 2012
Accepted: 21 January 2013
Published: 7 February 2013
Abstract
The unsteady natural convection heat transfer of nanofluid along a vertical plate embedded in porous medium is investigated. The Darcy-Forchheimer model is used to formulate the problem. Thermal conductivity and viscosity models based on a wide range of experimental data of nanofluids and incorporating the velocity-slip effect of the nanoparticle with respect to the base fluid, i.e., Brownian diffusion is used. The effective thermal conductivity of nanofluid in porous media is calculated using copper powder as porous media. The nonlinear governing equations are solved using an unconditionally stable implicit finite difference scheme. In this study, six different types of nanofluids have been compared with respect to the heat transfer enhancement, and the effects of particle concentration, particle size, temperature of the plate, and porosity of the medium on the heat transfer enhancement and skin friction coefficient have been studied in detail. It is found that heat transfer rate increases with the increase in particle concentration up to an optimal level, but on the further increase in particle concentration, the heat transfer rate decreases. For a particular value of particle concentration, small-sized particles enhance the heat transfer rates. On the other hand, skin friction coefficients always increase with the increase in particle concentration and decrease in nanoparticle size.
Keywords
Nanofluid Convection Porous medium Implicit FDM Numerical solutionBackground
Natural convection heat transfer in porous media is an important phenomenon in engineering systems due to its wide applications such as cooling of electronics components, heat exchangers, drying processes, building insulations, and geothermal and oil recovery. Due to high surface area, fluid mixing qualities, high thermal conductivity, and wide industrial applications, natural convection through porous media has gained considerable attention of various researchers in the past few decades. Cheng and Minkowycz [1] studied free convection about a vertical flat plate embedded in a porous medium with application to heat transfer from a dike. They used the boundary layer approximations and found the similarity solution for the problem. Evans and Plumb [2] investigated natural convection about a vertical plate embedded in a medium composed of glass beads with diameters ranging from 0.85 to 1.68 mm. Their experimental data was in good agreement with the theory. Cheng [3] and Hsu [4] investigated the Darcian free convection flow about a semi-infinite vertical plate. They used the higher-order approximation theory and confirmed the results of Evans and Plumb [2]. Kim and Vafai [5] analyzed the natural convection about a vertical plate embedded in a porous medium. They took two cases in their analysis, viz., constant wall temperature and constant heat flux. They found the analytic solution for the boundary layer flow using the methods of matching asymptotes. Badruddin et al. [6] investigated free convection and radiation for a vertical wall with varying temperatures embedded in a porous medium. Steady and unsteady free convection in a fluid past an inclined plate and immersed in a porous medium was studied by Chamka et al. [7] and Uddin and Kumar [8]. They used the Brinkmann-Forchheimer model for the flow in porous media. Some more details about the theoretical and experimental studies for the convection in porous media can be found in the work of Neild and Bejan [9].
In industries, heat transfer can be enhanced by modifying the design of the devices, e.g., increasing the surface area by addition of fins, applying magnetic field and electric field. In compact-designed devices, these techniques are hard to apply, so the other option for heat transfer enhancement is to use the fluid with high thermal conductivity. However, common fluids like water, ethylene glycol, and oil have low values of thermal conductivities. On the other hand, the metals and their oxide have high thermal conductivities compared to these fluids. Choi [10] proposed that the uniform dispersion of small concentration of nano-sized metal/metal oxides particles into a fluid enhances the thermal conductivity of the base fluid, and such fluids were termed as nanofluids. This concept attracted various researchers towards nanofluids, and various theoretical and experimental studies have been done to find the thermal properties of nanofluids. An extensive review of thermal properties of nanofluids can be found in the study of Wang and Majumdar [11]. From the literature, it is found that the thermal conductivity of nanofluids depends upon various factors, such as particle material, base fluid material, particle volume fraction, particle size, particle shape, temperature, nanoparticle Brownian motion, nanoparticle base fluid interfacial layer, and particle clustering. It is also found in the study of Wang and Majumdar [12] that the insertion of nanoparticle increases the viscosity of the fluid. There are various theoretical relations predicting the thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids, but these empirical relations do not satisfy the experimental data up to a satisfying range. Chon et al. [13] found an empirical correlation for the thermal conductivity of nanofluids within the particle size range of 11 to 150 nm and temperature range of 21°C to 71°C. They reported that the Brownian motion of nanoparticles constitutes a key mechanism of the thermal conductivity enhancement with increasing temperature and decreasing nanoparticle sizes. However, this empirical formula was valid only for water-Al_{2}O_{3} nanofluid. Very recently, Corcione [14] analyzed the experimental data of thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids, which were obtained by various researchers for different types of nanoparticles dispersed in different base fluids, and found an empirical correlating equation for the prediction of effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids.
With the advances in thermal properties and viscosity of nanofluids, various researchers studied the convective flow numerically as well as experimentally. Ho et al. [15] studied the natural convection of nanofluid having a particle concentration within the range of 0% to 4% in a square enclosure and analyzed the effects caused by uncertainties of viscosity and thermal conductivity. This study was limited to Al_{2}O_{3}-water nanofluid only. A detailed study of the natural convection of water-based nanofluids in an inclined enclosure has been done by Elif [16]. In this study, he investigated heat transfer enhancement using five different types of nanoparticles dispersed in water. To model the problem, he used a renovated Maxwell model containing the effect of interfacial layers in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids, given by Yu and Choi [17]. Abu-Nada and Oztop [18] investigated the effects of inclination angle on natural convection in enclosures filled with Cu-water nanofluid. All these authors reported that the heat transfer rate increases with the increase in nanoparticle concentration in the base fluid. However, in these studies, the effect of temperature and Brownian motion was not considered in the formulation of the problem. Abu-Nada [19] investigated the natural convection heat transfer in horizontal cylindrical annulus filled with Al_{2}O_{3}-water nanofluid taking the effect of variable viscosity and thermal conductivity. In the study, the effective thermal conductivity was calculated by the model of Chon et al. [13], and to formulate the dynamic viscosity of the Al_{2}O_{3}-water nanofluid, the author used the experimental data and found the empirical correlation for the dynamic viscosity as a function of temperature and particle concentration. Ho et al. [20] investigated the natural convection heat transfer of alumina-water nanofluid in vertical square enclosure experimentally. They reported that on higher Rayleigh numbers, the heat transfer rate increases on the dispersion of very small quantity of nanoparticles in water, but a larger quantity of nanoparticles in water decreases the heat transfer rates. The natural convection of nanofluids past vertical plate under different conditions has been studied by Hamad and Pope [21] and Rana and Bhargava [22]. They reported that the Nusselt number as well as the skin friction coefficient both increase with the increase in nanoparticle concentration in the base fluid. Zoubida et al. [23] investigated the effects of thermophoresis and Brownian motion significant in nanofluid heat transfer enhancement and found an enhancement in heat transfer at any volume fraction of nanoparticles. They also reported that the enhancement is more pronounced at low volume fraction of nanoparticles and that the heat transfer decreases by increasing the nanoparticle volume fraction.
The dispersion of nano-sized particles in the traditional fluid increased the thermal conductivity of the fluid, and the presence of porous media enhances the effective thermal conductivity of the base fluid. Thus, the use of nanofluids in porous media would be very much helpful in heat transfer enhancement. So far, very few studies have been done for the natural convection of nanofluids in porous media. Nield and Kuznetsov [24] studied the Cheng-Minkowycz problem for natural convection boundary layer flow in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid. In the modeling of the problem, they used nanofluids by incorporating the effects of Brownian motion and thermophoresis. For the porous medium, the Darcy model was taken. Aziz et al. [25] found the numerical solution for the free convection boundary layer flow past a horizontal flat plate embedded in porous medium filled by nanofluid containing gyrotactic microorganisms. Recently, Rana et al. [26] found the numerical solution for steady-mixed convection boundary layer flow of a nanofluid along an inclined plate embedded in a porous medium. In the studies of natural convection of nanofluids in porous media, the authors did the parametric study only. However, they did not account any effect of parameters influencing the thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity, such as particle concentration, particle size, temperature, nature of base fluid, and the nature of nanoparticle, which satisfy the experimental data for the thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of the nanofluids. In the best knowledge of the authors of this article, no such study has been done with regard to the natural convection of nanofluids in porous media. It is known that heat transfer in a fluid depends upon the temperature difference in fluid and heated surface and the thermophysical properties of the fluid. Heat transfer also depends upon the fluid flow rate, which depends upon the viscosity of the fluid.
As seen from the literature, most of the experimental studies on the thermal properties of nanofluids proved that the thermal conductivity of nanofluid depends upon the nanoparticle material, base fluid material, particle volume concentration, particle size, temperature, and nanoparticle Brownian motion. In previous works related to the flow of nanofluid in porous media, the authors used the variable thermophysical properties of the nanofluids, but it did not satisfy the experimental data for a wide range of reasons. Also, they did not consider the heat transfer through the two phases, i.e., nanofluid and porous media.
Therefore, the scope of the current research is to implement the appropriate models for the nanofluid properties, which consist the velocity-slip effects of nanoparticles with respect to the base fluid and the heat transfer flow in the two phases, i.e., through porous medium and nanofluid to be taken into account, and to analyze the effect of nanofluids on heat transfer enhancement in the natural convection in porous media.
Methods
Mathematical formulation
Here, u^{′} and v^{′} are the velocity components along the x^{′} and y^{′} axes. T^{′} is the temperature inside the boundary layer, ε is the porosity of the medium, K is the permeability of porous medium, and F is the Forchheimer constant.
Here, d_{ f } is the diameter of base fluid molecule, M is the molecular weight of the base fluid, N is the Avogadro number, and ρ_{fo} is the mass density of the base fluid calculated at the reference temperature.
The quantities of physical interest, such as the local Nusselt number, average Nusselt number, local skin friction coefficient, and average skin friction coefficients are given as follows:
Method of solution
Here, A_{ i }, B_{ i }, C_{ i }, D_{ i }, and E_{ i } (i = 1, 2) in Equation 25 are constants for a particular value of n. The subscript i denotes the grid point along the x direction, j along the y direction, and n along the time (t) direction. The grid point (x, y, t) are given by (i Δx, j Δy, n Δt). In the considered region, x varies from 0 to 1 and y varies from 0 to y_{max}. The value of y_{max} is 1.0, which lies very well outside the momentum and thermal boundary layers. Initially, at t = 0, all the values of u, v, and T are known. During any one time step, the values of u and v are known at previous time level. For every time step, first, the values of T are calculated using Equation 24, and then the values of u and v are calculated using Equations 23 and 22, respectively. At every time level, Equations 23 and 24 form a tridiagonal set of equations in the form of Equation 25. This tridiagonal system is solved by the Thomas algorithm, described by Carnahan et al. [27]. The solution of these equations is marched in time until the steady state is achieved. The steady-state solution is assumed to have been reached when the absolute difference between the values of u and v as well as the average value of the Nusselt number and average value of skin friction coefficient at two consecutive time steps is less than 10^{−5}. The grid sizes are taken as Δx = 0.05, Δy = 0.05, and Δt = 6.25 × 10^{−5}. Using Fourier expansion method and following Abd El-Naby et al. [28], it can be shown that the finite difference scheme described above is unconditionally stable and consistent. Therefore, the Lax-Richtmyer theorem implies convergence of the scheme [29]. We also checked the convergence of method using the computer code written in MATLAB to solve the above finite difference equations. The computer code was run for various grid spacing and various time intervals, and we found that if the grid spacing or the time spacing is further reduced, then there was no difference in the results. This shows that the scheme is convergent. To find the Nusselt number, skin friction coefficient, average Nusselt number, and average skin friction coefficient, the derivatives that appeared in Equations 18 to 21 are evaluated using the five point Newton's derivative formulae, and the definite integrations are evaluated using Simpson's integration formula.
Validation of the formulation
Nusselt number values for wall temperatures with permeability = 1.2 × 10^{−9} and 1/Da = 3.375 × 10^{ 6 }
Nusselt number values for wall temperatures with permeability = 1.4683 × 10^{−9} and 1/Da = 2.8605 × 10^{ 6 }
Results and discussion
Computations have been done for the vertical plate with a length of 40 mm placed in the copper powder (porous medium). The ambient temperature is considered to be 293 K. The value of Forchheimer coefficient (F) is taken as 0.55. Calculations have been done for six different types of nanofluids, viz. Al_{2}O_{3} + H_{2}O, TiO_{2} + H_{2}O, CuO + H_{2}O, Al_{2}O_{3} + ethylene glycol (EG), TiO_{2} + EG, and CuO + EG, with different nanoparticle concentration and particle diameter in the temperature range of 293 to 324 K. Base fluid thermophysical properties are taken at the intermediate temperature, i.e., 308 K, to get a good correlation between thermal conductivity and viscosity data used by Corcione [14].
Heat transfer enhancement at steady state using nanofluids
Properties of six different types of nanofluids
Nanofluid | α_{eff} (10^{−7}) | σ | Pr_{eff} | RaK_{eff} | μ _{nf} | Nu_{avg} | Cf_{avg} (10^{3}) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Al_{2}O_{3} + H_{2}O | 2.6100 | 0.9266 | 3.1656 | 101.6234 | 9.1980 × 10^{−4} | 13.1848 | 4.7330 |
TiO_{2} + H2O | 2.5443 | 0.9234 | 3.2048 | 104.3849 | 9.1980 × 10^{−4} | 13.2042 | 4.7204 |
CuO + H_{2}O | 2.9179 | 0.9519 | 2.5879 | 91.3187 | 9.1980 × 10^{−4} | 12.5223 | 4.8192 |
Al_{2}O_{3} + EG | 1.8052 | 1.0160 | 73.4908 | 139.8607 | 1.6100 × 10^{−2} | 12.1085 | 8.1741 |
TiO_{2} + EG | 1.7409 | 1.0096 | 75.2862 | 145.0326 | 1.6100 × 10^{−2} | 12.1394 | 8.1421 |
CuO + EG | 2.1278 | 1.0711 | 57.4017 | 118.6878 | 1.6100 × 10^{−2} | 11.1641 | 8.3152 |
Average Nusselt number and average skin friction coefficients for Al_{ 2 }O_{ 3 } + H_{ 2 }O and Al_{ 2 }O_{ 3 } + EG
Nanofluid | Φ | Nu_{avg} | Percentage increase in Nu_{avg} at steady state | Cf_{avg} (10^{3}) | Percentage increase in Cf_{avg} at steady state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Al_{2}O_{3} + H_{2}O | 0 | 11.7178 | 12.11% | 4.4865 | 6.34% |
Al_{2}O_{3} + H_{2}O | 0.05 | 13.1371 | 4.7711 | ||
Al_{2}O_{3} + EG | 0 | 9.8380 | 23.16% | 7.8077 | 5.06% |
Al_{2}O_{3} + EG | 0.05 | 12.1162 | 8.2028 |
Figure 3c,d depicts the variation of local Nusselt number and local skin friction coefficients along the length of the plate at steady state. It is clear from Figure 3c that the local Nusselt number increases very fast along the plate up to a fixed distance, but after that, it increases almost linearly. The slope of this linearly increasing effect is larger for the water-based nanofluid as compared with the EG-based nanofluid. Figure 3d shows that the skin friction coefficients for the EG-based nanofluid is much larger than those for water-based nanofluid, and this resisted the motion of fluid, which is the reason why the Nusselt numbers for EG-based nanofluids are lesser than those of the water-based nanofluids.
Temperature dependence of heat transfer enhancement and determination of optimal particle concentration in Al_{2}O_{3} + water nanofluid
Variation in average Nusselt number and average skin friction coefficient with concentration at 303 K
Φ | Nu_{avg} | Percentage increase in Nu_{avg} at steady state | Cf_{avg} (10^{3}) | Percentage increase in Cf_{avg} at steady state |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7.3157 | - | 1.7009 | - |
0.01 | 7.5058 | 2.60 | 1.7150 | 0.36 |
0.02 | 7.5363 | 3.02 | 1.7154 | 0.38 |
0.025 | 7.5313 | 2.95 | 1.7150 | 0.36 |
0.04 | 7.4612 | 1.99 | 1.7130 | 0.24 |
Variation in average Nusselt number and average skin friction coefficient with concentration at 310 K
Φ | Nu_{avg} | Percentage increase in Nu_{avg} at steady state | Cf_{avg} (10^{3}) | Percentage increase in Cf_{avg} at steady state |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 9.1505 | - | 2.7202 | - |
0.02 | 9.5864 | 4.76 | 2.7592 | 1.43 |
0.03 | 9.5875 | 4.78 | 2.7686 | 2.09 |
0.04 | 9.5262 | 4.11 | 2.7767 | 2.08 |
0.06 | 9.2465 | 1.05 | 2.7916 | 2.62 |
Variation in average Nusselt number and average skin friction coefficient with concentration at 317 K
Φ | Nu_{avg} | Percentage increase in Nu_{avg} at steady state | Cf_{avg} (10^{3}) | Percentage increase in Cf_{avg} at steady state |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 10.5850 | - | 3.6357 | - |
0.01 | 11.1776 | 5.60 | 3.6945 | 1.62 |
0.02 | 11.3780 | 7.49 | 3.7244 | 2.44 |
0.03 | 11.4590 | 8.26 | 3.7483 | 3.10 |
0.035 | 11.4674 | 8.34 | 3.7589 | 3.39 |
0.04 | 11.4576 | 8.24 | 3.7690 | 3.67 |
0.06 | 11.2646 | 6.42 | 3.8052 | 4.66 |
0.09 | 10.6124 | 0.26 | 3.8493 | 5.88 |
Variation in average Nusselt number and average skin friction coefficient with concentration at 324 K
Φ | Nu_{avg} | Percentage increase in Nu_{avg} at steady state | Cf_{avg} (10^{3}) | Percentage increase in Cf_{avg} at steady state |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 11.7178 | - | 4.4865 | - |
0.01 | 12.6260 | 7.75 | 4.5904 | 2.32 |
0.02 | 12.9659 | 10.65 | 4.6463 | 3.56 |
0.04 | 13.1848 | 12.52 | 4.7330 | 5.49 |
0.05 | 13.1371 | 12.11 | 4.7711 | 6.34 |
0.06 | 13.0020 | 10.96 | 4.8076 | 7.16 |
0.09 | 12.1363 | 3.57 | 4.9109 | 9.46 |
From Figure 4, it is depicted that for a particular value of concentration, the average Nusselt number decreases with time and attains a steady state after a particular time. At the start of heat flow, if we increase the concentration, the average Nusselt number is always higher than its value at lower concentration level, but as the process moves toward the steady state, the average Nusselt number decreases after a fixed concentration level, and this concentration level depends upon the temperature of the plate.
Thermophysical properties of Al_{ 2 }O_{ 3 } + H_{ 2 }O nanofluid for different wall temperatures and concentration
Properties | Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
At T = 324 K, d_{ p } = 10 nm, ε = 0.72 | Φ | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
ρ (10^{3}) | 0.998 | 1.0268 | 1.0556 | 1.0845 | 1.1133 | 1.1421 | 1.1709 | 1.2574 | |
β_{nf} (10^{3}) | 0.214 | 0.2062 | 0.1989 | 0.1919 | 0.1853 | 0.179 | 0.1731 | 0.1568 | |
C_{pnf} (10^{3}) | 4.187 | 4.1871 | 4.1872 | 4.1873 | 4.1874 | 4.1875 | 4.1876 | 4.1878 | |
μ _{nf} | 0.0007 | 0.0007 | 0.0008 | 0.0009 | 0.0009 | 0.001 | 0.0011 | 0.0016 | |
k _{nf} | 0.6288 | 0.7281 | 0.7857 | 0.8339 | 0.8768 | 0.9161 | 0.9529 | 1.0523 | |
k _{eff} | 0.8728 | 1.0106 | 1.0905 | 1.1573 | 1.2167 | 1.2713 | 1.3222 | 1.46 | |
α_{eff} (10^{−6}) | 0.2089 | 0.235 | 0.2467 | 0.2548 | 0.261 | 0.2658 | 0.2697 | 0.2773 | |
Pr_{eff} | 3.358 | 3.0766 | 3.0441 | 3.0801 | 3.1656 | 3.2973 | 3.4795 | 4.4709 | |
RaK_{eff} | 172.7511 | 143.4813 | 126.9420 | 113.4505 | 101.6234 | 90.8972 | 80.8972 | 53.9553 | |
Σ | 0.9505 | 0.944 | 0.9379 | 0.9321 | 0.9266 | 0.9214 | 0.9164 | 0.9029 | |
At T = 317, d_{ p } = 10 nm | Φ | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
k _{nf} | 0.6288 | 0.7079 | 0.7538 | 0.7922 | 0.8264 | 0.8577 | 0.887 | 0.9662 | |
k _{eff} | 0.8728 | 0.9826 | 1.0462 | 1.0995 | 1.1468 | 1.1903 | 1.2309 | 1.3407 | |
α_{eff} (10^{−6}) | 0.2089 | 0.2285 | 0.2367 | 0.2421 | 0.246 | 0.2489 | 0.251 | 0.2546 | |
Pr_{eff} | 3.358 | 3.1643 | 3.1728 | 3.242 | 3.3584 | 3.5216 | 3.7376 | 4.8687 | |
RaK_{eff} | 133.7428 | 114.2469 | 102.4320 | 92.4494 | 83.4695 | 75.1410 | 67.2753 | 45.4884 | |
At T = 310 K, d_{ p } = 10 nm | Φ | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
k _{nf} | 0.6288 | 0.6915 | 0.7279 | 0.7584 | 0.7854 | 0.8103 | 0.8335 | 0.8963 | |
k _{eff} | 0.8728 | 0.9598 | 1.0103 | 1.0525 | 1.0901 | 1.1245 | 1.1567 | 1.2438 | |
α_{eff} (10^{−6}) | 0.2089 | 0.2232 | 0.2286 | 0.2318 | 0.2338 | 0.2351 | 0.2359 | 0.2362 | |
Pr_{eff} | 3.358 | 3.2393 | 3.2857 | 3.3867 | 3.5334 | 3.7276 | 3.9773 | 5.2482 | |
RaK_{eff} | 94.7345 | 82.8428 | 75.1371 | 68.4071 | 62.2040 | 56.3387 | 50.7101 | 34.7324 | |
At T = 303, d_{ p } = 10 nm | Φ | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
k _{nf} | 0.6288 | 0.6783 | 0.707 | 0.731 | 0.7523 | 0.7719 | 0.7902 | 0.8398 | |
k _{eff} | 0.8728 | 0.9414 | 0.9812 | 1.0145 | 1.0441 | 1.0713 | 1.0967 | 1.1654 | |
α_{eff} (10^{−6}) | 0.2089 | 0.219 | 0.222 | 0.2234 | 0.224 | 0.224 | 0.2237 | 0.2213 | |
Pr_{eff} | 3.358 | 3.3026 | 3.383 | 3.5135 | 3.6888 | 3.9128 | 4.195 | 5.6014 | |
RaK_{eff} | 55.7261 | 49.6834 | 45.5077 | 41.7463 | 38.2001 | 34.7866 | 31.4619 | 21.8057 |
In Tables 5, 6, 7, and 8, the values of average skin friction are also given. It can be seen in the tables that the average skin friction coefficient always increases with the increase in particle concentration and wall temperature. This means that the increased concentration increases the viscosity of the nanofluid (as given in Table 9), and it hinders the motion of nanofluid particles and causes the increase in skin friction coefficients.
The effect of particle concentration on the local Nusselt number and local skin friction coefficients at steady state are shown in Figures 6 and 7. In these figures, the inset inside the figure shows the zoomed view near the end of the plate. From the figures, it is observed that with the increase in concentrations, the local Nusselt number always increases near the lower end of the plate, but this increase is very small. As we move upward along the plate, the local Nusselt number starts to decrease after the optimal concentration level. For very high concentrations (as compared to optimal concentration level), the local Nusselt number initially increases near the lower end of the plate, and then its value becomes the smallest, and near the upper end of the plate, it becomes the highest, as shown in Figure 6a,b. This abnormal behavior at high concentrations may be due to the increased nanoparticle clustering with the increase in concentration of nanoparticles in the base fluid.
Figure 7 depicts that with the increase in concentration of the nanoparticle in the base fluid, local skin friction coefficient increases. This is because of the increase in viscosity of the nanofluid with the increase in concentration as given in Table 9.
Dependence on particle diameter
Properties of Al_{ 2 }O_{ 3 } + H_{ 2 }O nanofluid for different particle diameters
Properties | Particle diameters d_{ p } (nm) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 25 | 40 | 55 | 70 | 115 | 130 | |
μ_{nf}(10^{−3}) | 0.9198 | 0.8553 | 0.831 | 0.8171 | 0.8077 | 0.7908 | 0.7871 |
k _{nf} | 0.8768 | 0.8007 | 0.7712 | 0.7542 | 0.7427 | 0.7222 | 0.7177 |
k _{eff} | 1.2167 | 1.1112 | 1.0703 | 1.0467 | 1.0307 | 1.0023 | 0.9961 |
α_{eff} (10^{−6}) | 0.261 | 0.2384 | 0.2296 | 0.2245 | 0.2211 | 0.215 | 0.2137 |
Pr_{eff} | 3.1656 | 3.2229 | 3.2511 | 3.2687 | 3.2812 | 3.304 | 3.309 |
RaK_{eff} | 101.6243 | 119.6707 | 127.8621 | 132.9777 | 136.6173 | 143.4837 | 145.0528 |
Comparison between different nanofluids
Dependence on porosity and permeability of the medium
Variation in physical properties with the porosity of medium
Properties | Porosity ε | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 | 0.55 | 0.6 | 0.72 | |
K | 7.4 × 10^{−10} | 1.2 × 10^{−9} | 2 × 10^{−9} | 7 × 10^{−9} |
k _{eff} | 1.7497 | 1.59137 | 1.4592 | 1.2167 |
α_{eff} (10^{−7}) | 3.7534 | 3.4135 | 3.1301 | 2.6100 |
Pr_{eff} | 2.2013 | 2.4204 | 2.6396 | 3.1656 |
RaK_{eff} | 10.7041 | 17.5821 | 28.8800 | 101.7845 |
σ | 0.8689 | 0.8820 | 0.8951 | 0.9266 |
Conclusions
In the present study, we have numerically investigated the natural convection heat transfer of nanofluids along the isothermal vertical plate embedded in a porous medium. For thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids, empirical equations have been used, which suit best with the experimental data and incorporate the velocity-slip effects of the nanoparticles with respect to the base fluid. The effective thermal conductivity of the nanofluid in porous media has been taken into account. Here, three different nanoparticles, viz. Al_{2}O_{3}, CuO, and TiO_{2} with a valid range of particle concentration and particle size, have been taken with two base fluids, viz. water and EG. The natural convection of water in porous media had been initially studied, and we found a good agreement with the result available in the literature. The main findings of the study are as follows:
Percentage increase in the average Nusselt number at steady state for EG-based nanofluids is much more than that in the water-based nanofluids, and the percentage increase in average skin friction coefficient at steady state is almost the same in both cases.
The value of the average Nusselt number at steady state for water-based nanofluids is more than that of the EG-based nanofluids, but the value of the average skin friction coefficient at steady state for water-based nanofluids is much lesser than that of the EG-based nanofluids.
For the nanofluids with the same base fluid and different nanoparticles, there is a very small difference in the average Nusselt number and average skin friction coefficients. Among these values, the average Nusselt number and average skin friction coefficient for fluid containing TiO_{2} are a bit higher than those of the other two nanofluids.
From the three results, it is concluded that the heat transfer in nanofluids highly depends upon the nature of the base fluid rather than the nature of the added nanoparticles.
The average Nusselt number increases with the increase in nanoparticle concentration up to an optimal particle concentration and after it decreases. With the increase in plate temperature the optimal nanoparticle concentration level increases.
The average value of skin friction coefficient always increases with the increase in nanoparticle concentration.
For a particular value of concentration, the smallest nanoparticles enhance the heat transfer the most; skin friction coefficient also increases with the decrease in nanoparticle size.
For high values of porosity of the medium, the Nusselt number and skin friction coefficients are larger than their values in the low porosity medium.
In our future study, we will consider the effects of fouling and boiling in nanofluids and its effect on heat transfer. We will also perform some experiments for the natural convection of nanofluids in the same configuration and we will compare the numerical results with experiments.
Nomenclature
C_{ P }: specific heat (J.kg^{−1}.K^{−1}); d: diameter (m); Da: Darcy number; Ec: Eckert number; F: Forchheimer's constant; Fr: Forchheimer's coefficient; g: gravitational acceleration (9.81 m.s^{−2}); K: permeability (m^{2}); k: thermal conductivity (W.m^{−1}.K^{−1}); k_{ b }: Boltzmann's constant ( 1.3806503 × 10^{−23} m^{2}.kg.s^{−2}.K^{−1}); L: length of the plate (m); M: molecular weight of fluid (kg.mol^{−1}); N: Avogadro's number (6.0223 × 10^{23}); Pr: base fluid Prandtl number; Ra: Rayleigh number; RaK: modified Rayleigh number; Re: nanoparticle Reynold's number; T′: temperature (K); u and v: dimensionless velocities in the x and y directions; u′ and v′: velocity component in the x′ and y′ direction (m.s^{−1}).; ρ: Density (kg.m^{−3}); μ: dynamic viscosity (Pa.s); σ: volumetric heat capacity ratio of medium; ε: porosity; α: thermal diffusivity (m^{2}.s^{−1}); β: coefficient of volume expansion (K^{−1}); θ: dimensionless temperature; Φ: percentage of nanoparticle in base fluid.; ∞: Ambient fluid; avg: average; c: nondimensional coefficient; eff: effective property in porous medium; f: base fluid; m: porous medium; nf: nanofluid; p: nanoparticle; w: plate surface.
Greek symbols
C_{ P }: specific heat (J.kg^{−1}.K^{−1}); d: diameter (m); Da: Darcy number; Ec: Eckert number; F: Forchheimer's constant; Fr: Forchheimer's coefficient; g: gravitational acceleration (9.81 m.s^{−2}); K: permeability (m^{2}); k: thermal conductivity (W.m^{−1}.K^{−1}); k_{ b }: Boltzmann's constant ( 1.3806503 × 10^{−23} m^{2}.kg.s^{−2}.K^{−1}); L: length of the plate (m); M: molecular weight of fluid (kg.mol^{−1}); N: Avogadro's number (6.0223 × 10^{23}); Pr: base fluid Prandtl number; Ra: Rayleigh number; RaK: modified Rayleigh number; Re: nanoparticle Reynold's number; T′: temperature (K); u and v: dimensionless velocities in the x and y directions; u′ and v′: velocity component in the x′ and y′ direction (m.s^{−1}).; ρ: Density (kg.m^{−3}); μ: dynamic viscosity (Pa.s); σ: volumetric heat capacity ratio of medium; ε: porosity; α: thermal diffusivity (m^{2}.s^{−1}); β: coefficient of volume expansion (K^{−1}); θ: dimensionless temperature; Φ: percentage of nanoparticle in base fluid.; ∞: Ambient fluid; avg: average; c: nondimensional coefficient; eff: effective property in porous medium; f: base fluid; m: porous medium; nf: nanofluid; p: nanoparticle; w: plate surface.
Subscripts
C_{ P }: specific heat (J.kg^{−1}.K^{−1}); d: diameter (m); Da: Darcy number; Ec: Eckert number; F: Forchheimer's constant; Fr: Forchheimer's coefficient; g: gravitational acceleration (9.81 m.s^{−2}); K: permeability (m^{2}); k: thermal conductivity (W.m^{−1}.K^{−1}); k_{ b }: Boltzmann's constant ( 1.3806503 × 10^{−23} m^{2}.kg.s^{−2}.K^{−1}); L: length of the plate (m); M: molecular weight of fluid (kg.mol^{−1}); N: Avogadro's number (6.0223 × 10^{23}); Pr: base fluid Prandtl number; Ra: Rayleigh number; RaK: modified Rayleigh number; Re: nanoparticle Reynold's number; T′: temperature (K); u and v: dimensionless velocities in the x and y directions; u′ and v′: velocity component in the x′ and y′ direction (m.s^{−1}).; ρ: Density (kg.m^{−3}); μ: dynamic viscosity (Pa.s); σ: volumetric heat capacity ratio of medium; ε: porosity; α: thermal diffusivity (m^{2}.s^{−1}); β: coefficient of volume expansion (K^{−1}); θ: dimensionless temperature; Φ: percentage of nanoparticle in base fluid.; ∞: Ambient fluid; avg: average; c: nondimensional coefficient; eff: effective property in porous medium; f: base fluid; m: porous medium; nf: nanofluid; p: nanoparticle; w: plate surface.
Authors’ information
ZU is a post doctoral researcher in the Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambrésis, Valenciennes, France. He got his Ph.D. from G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India. After his Ph.D., he worked as an assistant professor of Mathematics in India. His current research interests cover analytical and numerical solutions of nonlinear problems arising in applied sciences and engineering phenomena related to fluid flow and thermal systems. SH is a professor and vice president of the University of Valenciennes & Hainaut Cambresis, France. She guided many Ph.D. students and successfully finished many industrial and scientific projects.
Declarations
Acknowledgments
The comments and suggestions by the reviewers of this article and the corrections made by the language editor to improve the manuscript are highly acknowledged.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Cheng P, Minkowycz WJ: Free convection about a vertical flat plate embedded in a porous medium with application to heat transfer from a dike. J Geophysics Res 1977, 82: 2040–2044. 10.1029/JB082i014p02040View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evans GH, Plumb OA: Natural convection from a vertical isothermal surface imbedded in a saturated porous medium. In Proceedings of the AIAA-ASME Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference: 24–26 May 1978. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Palo Alto; 1978. Paper 78-HT-55 Paper 78-HT-55Google Scholar
- Cheng P, Hsu CT: Higher order approximation for Darcian free convection flow about a semi-infinite vertical plate. ASME J Heat Transfer 1984, 106: 143–151. 10.1115/1.3246627View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hsu CT, Cheng P: The Brinkman model for natural convection about a semi-infinite vertical flat plate in a porous medium. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 1985, 28: 683–697. 10.1016/0017-9310(85)90190-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim SJ, Vafai K: Analysis of natural convection about a vertical plate embedded in a porous medium. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 1989, 32: 665–677. 10.1016/0017-9310(89)90214-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Badruddin IA, Zainal ZA, Aswatha Narayana PA, Seetharamu KN, Siew LW: Free convection and radiation for a vertical wall with varying temperature embedded in a porous medium. Int J Thermal Sci 2006, 45: 487–493. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2005.05.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chamkha Ali J, Issa C, Khanafer K: Natural convection from an inclined plate embedded in a variable porosity porous medium due to solar radiation. Int J Therm Sci 2002, 41: 73–81. 10.1016/S1290-0729(01)01305-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uddin Z, Kumar M: Unsteady free convection in a fluid past an inclined plate immersed in a porous medium. Comput Model New Tech 2010, 14(3):41–47.Google Scholar
- Neild DA, Bejan A: Convection in Porous Media. 3rd edition. Springer, New York; 2006.Google Scholar
- Choi S, Eastman JA: Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. In Developments and Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows. Edited by: Siginer DA, Wang HP. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York; 1995:99–105.Google Scholar
- Wang X-Q, Majumdar AS: Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. Int J Thermal Sci 2007, 46: 1–19. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.06.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang X-Q, Majumdar AS: A review on nanofluids - part I: theoretical and numerical investigations. Braz J Chem Eng 2008, 25(4):613–630.Google Scholar
- Chon HC, Kihm DK, Lee SP, Stephan Choi US: Empirical correlation finding the role of temperature and particle size for nanofluid (Al2O3) thermal conductivity enhancement. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87: 153107. 10.1063/1.2093936View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Corcione M: Empirical correlating equations for predicting the effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Energy Convers Manage 2011, 52: 789–793. 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.072View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ho CJ, Chen MW, Li ZW: Numerical simulation of natural convection of nanofluid in a square enclosure: effects due to uncertainties of viscosity and thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2008, 51: 4506–4516. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.12.019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elif BO: Natural convection of water-based nanofluids in an inclined enclosure with a heat source. Int J Thermal Sci 2009, 48: 2063–2073. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.03.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu W, Choi SUS: The role of interfacial layers in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a renovated Maxwell model. J Nanopart Res 2003, 5: 167–171.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Nada E, Oztop HF: Effects of inclination angle on natural convection in enclosures filled with Cu–water nanofluid, Int J heat Fluid Flow. Int J Heat and Fluid Flow 2009, 30(4):669–678. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2009.02.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Nada E: Effect of variable viscosity and thermal conductivity of Al2O3-water nanofluid on heat transfer enhancement in natural convection. Int J Heat and Fluid Flow 2009, 30: 679–690. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2009.02.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ho CJ, Liu WK, Chang YS, Lin CC: Natural convection heat transfer of alumina-water nanofluid in vertical square enclosure: an experimental study. Int J Thermal Sci 2010, 49: 1345–1353. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2010.02.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hamad MAA, Pop I: Unsteady MHD free convection flow past a vertical permeable flat plate in a rotating frame of reference with constant heat source in a nanofluid. Heat Mass Transfer 2011, 47: 1517–1524. 10.1007/s00231-011-0816-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rana P, Bhargava R: Numerical study of heat transfer enhancement in mixed convection flow along a vertical plate with heat source/sink utilizing nanofluids. Comm Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulate 2011, 16: 4318–4334. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.03.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zoubida H, Eiyad A-n, Oztop HF, Mataoui A: Natural convection in nanofluids: are the thermophoresis and Brownian motion effects significant in nanofluid heat transfer enhancement? Int j Thermal Sci 2012, 57: 152–162.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nield DA, Kuznetsov AV: The Cheng-Minkowycz problem for natural convection boundary-layer flow in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2009, 52: 5792–5795. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.07.024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aziz A, Khan WA, Pop I: Free convection boundary layer flow past a horizontal flat plate embedded in porous medium filled by nanofluid containing gyrotactic microorganisms. Int J Thermal Sci 2012, 56: 48–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rana P, Bhargava R, Beg OA: Numerical solution for mixed convection boundary layer flow of a nanofluid along an inclined plate embedded in a porous medium. Comput Math Appl 2012, 64(9):2816–2832. 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.04.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carnahan B, Luther HA, Wilkes JO: Applied Numerical Methods. John Wiley and Sons, New York; 1969.Google Scholar
- Abd E-N, Elbrabary MA, Elsayed ME, Abdelazem Nader Y: Finite difference solution of radiation effects on MHD unsteady free-convection flow over vertical porous plate. Appl Math Comput 2004, 151: 327–346. 10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00344-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman JD: Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists. McGraw-Hill, New York; 1992.Google Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.