Room temperature-synthesized vertically aligned InSb nanowires: electrical transport and field emission characteristics
© Kuo et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 29 December 2012
Accepted: 31 January 2013
Published: 11 February 2013
Vertically aligned single-crystal InSb nanowires were synthesized via the electrochemical method at room temperature. The characteristics of Fourier transform infrared spectrum revealed that in the syntheses of InSb nanowires, energy bandgap shifts towards the short wavelength with the occurrence of an electron accumulation layer. The current–voltage curve, based on the metal–semiconductor–metal model, showed a high electron carrier concentration of 2.0 × 1017 cm−3 and a high electron mobility of 446.42 cm2 V−1 s−1. Additionally, the high carrier concentration of the InSb semiconductor with the surface accumulation layer induced a downward band bending effect that reduces the electron tunneling barrier. Consequently, the InSb nanowires exhibit significant field emission properties with an extremely low turn-on field of 1.84 V μm−1 and an estimative threshold field of 3.36 V μm−1.
KeywordsInSb nanowires Electrical transport Field emission Electron accumulation layer Electrochemical method
Group III-V semiconductor nanowires, i.e., InAs, InP, GaAs, GaP, and InSb, have attracted substantial scientific and technological interests in nanoelectronic devices due to their high electronic transfer characteristic with low leakage currents. Meanwhile, the existence of an electron accumulation layer occurs near the material surface that causes high surface sensitivity and electric conductivity . Among the III-V group, indium antimony (InSb) bulk (Eg = 0.17 eV, at 300 K) is a promising III-V direct-bandgap semiconductor material with zinc-blende (FCC) structure. Due to its narrow bandgap, InSb is extensively used in the fabrication of infrared optical detectors, infrared homing missile guidance systems, and infrared astronomy [2–4]. Next, a significant advantage of InSb is that it has extremely high electron mobility (electron mobility of 77,000 cm2 V−1 s−1) that resulted from the natural small effective mass (m* = 0.013 me) and the ballistic length (up to 0.7 μm at 300 K), which are higher than those of any known semiconductor [5, 6]. Hence, there is significant interest in InSb for the fundamental investigation of its nanostructure for potential application as nanoelectronic devices.
Interestingly, owing to their high surface-to-volume ratio and quantum confinement effect, one-dimensional (1-D) semiconductive nanostructures exhibit unique optical, electronic, and transport properties, which are widely applied in photoconductors , electron field emitters , and dye-sensitized solar cells . In the middle of these various application fields, 1-D electron field emission has attracted wide attention recently due to the sufficient high current density obtained from small electrical field. It is because a cone nanostructure (usually several hundred nanometers) is able to greatly amplify the electrical field within an extremely tiny region of the tips. Nanostructures have consequently served as the proper candidates for electron field emitters .
Up to now, different thermal synthesis methods have been used to produce InSb nanowires, i.e., chemical beam epitaxy , chemical vapor deposition , and pulsed laser deposition . However, the fast and simple synthesis of stoichiometric InSb nanostructures is also of priority concern. The different partial vapor pressures of In and Sb make it difficult to form the InSb compound. In particular, the low bonding energy of InSb causes the tendency of In and Sb to dissociate over 400°C. Additionally, the In-rich and Sb-rich regions derive from the large different melting points of In and Sb elements. Therefore, synthesizing InSb nanowires via thermal synthesis method is a challenging task since the growth of stoichiometric InSb nanowires requires precisely critical temperature control [6, 12, 14]. To address this concern, this work has utilized the electrochemical method at room temperature to fabricate single-crystal InSb nanowires with an anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) template. The synthesized process was a simple, fast, low-temperature (avoids the phase dissociation at a high temperature), and straightforward process for fabricating large-area, highly ordered, aligned InSb nanowires. Furthermore, the as-prepared InSb nanowires are expected to possess the electron accumulation layer on the surface. Importantly, the electron accumulation layer significantly affects the optical, transport, and field emission characteristics.
These as-prepared nanowires were examined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM; HITACHI S-4800, operated at 10 kV, Chiyoda-ku, Japan), a desktop X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, D2 Phaser, Madison, WI, USA), a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM; JEOL JEM-3000 F, operated at 300 kV, Akishima-shi, Japan) with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX), and an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy system (XPS, PerkinElmer model PHI600 system, Waltham, MA, USA). The optical properties were then examined from a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Bruker, Verpex 70 V). For the transport measurement, the synthesized InSb nanowires were dispersed onto a SiO2/Si substrate with pre-patterned Pt/Ti electrodes through a photolithograph, then through e-beam evaporation and the lift-off process, respectively. Subsequently, the focused ion beam was used to deposit Pt, which connects wires between Pt/Ti electrodes. Finally, the current–voltage (I-V) measurements were carried out using the Keithley 237 (Cleveland, OH, USA). The field emission current density versus applied field (J-E) measurements were performed in a vacuum chamber with a base pressure of about 6 × 10−6 Torr at room temperature. The inter-electrode gap (distance) between the anode and the cathode (InSb nanowires) was controlled using a preci-sion screw meter. The Keithley 237 high-voltage source-measurement unit was used to provide the sweeping electric field to record the corresponding emission currents.
Results and discussion
where n is the electron carrier concentration, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature. The me* and mh* are the effective masses of electron and hole, respectively. Given that me* = 0.014 m0 and mh* = 0.43 m0, the electron carrier concentration could be calculated from Equation 1. According to the calculation, the electron carrier concentration was 3.94 × 1017 cm−3, which is more than the intrinsic carrier concentration of InSb . Therefore, the enlargement of energy bandgap and high electron density characteristics verified that the synthesized InSb nanowires are degenerate semiconductors, of which the Fermi level is located above the conduction band minimum . Based on the theoretical calculation using Equation 1, during the crystal growth process, the high carrier concentration can be ascribed to the formation of Sb vacancies in InSb nanowires.
where E00 is an important parameter in tunneling theory, Nd is the electron concentration, εs and ε0 are the relative permittivity of the semiconducting nanowire and free space, respectively. As is estimated, the electron carrier concentration was 2.0 × 1017 cm−3, which is close to the estimative value of the BM effect. At the large bias, differentiating the I-V curve can obtain the total resistance associated with the nanowire. The resistivity ρ of 0.07 Ω cm was obtained from the I-V curve at large bias. Furthermore, according to σ = nqμ, the corresponding electron mobility μ of the InSb nanowire was estimated to be 446.42 cm2 V−1 s−1. The value is three times higher than that of reported n-type InSb nanowires . However, the value is much smaller than those of the bulk and thin films. The reason of decay is attributed to the enhanced surface roughness scattering [13, 35, 36]. The nanowire surface becomes rough due to the presence of surface defects. Moreover, surface roughness scattering becomes strong and further limits the movement of electrons due to the decrease of nanowire diameter. It is still higher than that of known oxide semiconductor nanowires [33, 37, 38]. This implies that it has high potential for application in high-speed nanoelectronic devices.
The F-N emission behavior can be observed by plotting the ln(J/E2) versus 1/E curve, shown in the inset of Figure 5b. The linear curve implies that the field emission behavior of nanowires follows the F-N theory. Based on the F-N theory, the field enhancement factor β of InSb nanowires can be calculated. According to the work function of InSb (4.57 eV) , the field enhancement factor β is regarded as 20,300. Generally, the field emission performance is usually associated with the crystal geometry, the dimension of the material, emission height, crystal structure, conductivity, work function, and the density of nanostructures . In this work, the excellent turn-on field (Eon) of InSb nanowires can be attributed as follows: The high carrier concentration of the InSb nanowires with the Fermi level is located above the conduction band minimum, significantly reducing the effective electron tunneling barrier. Figure 5c illustrates the band diagram of degenerate InSb nanowires. The large density of states in the InSb conduction band (i.e., surface accumulation layer) causes a downward band bending near the surface region that eventually leads to lower the electron tunneling barriers. Additionally, the Fermi level is located above the conduction band minimum that can also improve the efficiency of tunneling at a low electric field. Next, the vertically aligned nanowires also play an important role. The high aspect ratio of the nanowires at applied electric field easily makes the electrons to accumulate on the surface and enhance significant field emission property. However, the density of nanowires must be moderate [46, 47]. Previous works reported that the electrostatic screening effect increased the turn-on field and decreased the overall emission current density of densely packed grown nanowires [48, 49]. This is because the applied electric field will overlap with that of the others. Consequently, the effective electric field of densely packed nanowires will be lowered compared to the stand-alone nanowires. Here, there is a reduced screening effect in the vertically aligned InSb nanowires due to a sufficient spacing between the emitters; meanwhile, there is the nanodimension structure with high aspect ratio. Therefore, the electron accumulation that occurs in the conduction band and sufficient spacing in aligned nanostructures can simultaneously enhance field emission property.
Single-crystalline InSb nanowires can be successfully synthesized via the electrochemical method at room temperature. The I-V curve of the InSb nanowires based on the M-S-M model shows low resistivity ρ of 0.07 Ω cm owing to the existence of Sb vacancies. Meanwhile, InSb nanowires have a high electron concentration of 2.0 × 1017 cm−3 and a high electron mobility of 446.42 cm2 V−1 s−1. Also, the energy bandgap increases from 0.17 to 0.208 eV due to the filling up of low-energy states in the conduction band by excess electrons. Thus, the enlargement of energy bandgap and high electron concentration reveal that the InSb nanowires are degenerate semiconductors with the Fermi level located above the conduction band minimum. The accumulation layer occurs at the surface of InSb nanowires. The surface accumulation layer in the InSb conduction band causes a downward band bending near the surface region that eventually leads to lowering of the electron tunneling barriers. Moreover, a sufficient spacing between the InSb nanoemitter can significantly reduce the screening effect. Consequently, the vertically aligned InSb nanowires exhibit an extremely low turn-on field of 1.84 V μm−1 and an estimative threshold field at 3.36 V μm−1 when the current density was 1 μA cm−2 and 0.1 mA cm−2, respectively. The outstanding characteristics of InSb nanowires are highly promising for use in nanoelectronics, especially in the front area of flat panel displays and high-speed-response field-effect transistors.
The authors thank the financial supports from the National Science Council, Taiwan, under grant nos. NSC-99-2221-E-007-069-MY3 and NSC-100-2628-E-035-006-MY2.
- Offermans P, Calama MC, Brongersma SH: Gas detection with vertical InAs nanowire arrays. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 2412–2415. 10.1021/nl1005405View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Michel E, Razeghi M: Recent advances in Sb-based materials for uncooled infrared photodetectors. Opto-Electr Rev 1998, 6: 11–23.Google Scholar
- Yang Y, Li L, Huang X, Li G, Zhang L: Fabrication and optical property of single-crystalline InSb nanowire arrays. J Mater Sci 2007, 42: 2753–2757. 10.1007/s10853-006-1272-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang XR, Hao YF, Meng GW, Zhang LD: Fabrication of highly ordered InSb nanowire arrays by electrodeposition in porous anodic alumina membranes. J Electrochem Soc 2005, 152: C664-C668. 10.1149/1.2007187View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rode DL: Electron transport in InSb, InAs, and InP. Phys Rev B 1971, 3: 3287–3299. 10.1103/PhysRevB.3.3287View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang X, Wang G, Slattery P, Zhang JZ, Li Y: Ultrasmall single-crystal indium antimonide nanowires. Crystal Growth and Design 2010, 10: 2479–2482. 10.1021/cg100376uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang Y, Guo W, Qi J, Zhao J, Zhang Y: Self-powered ultraviolet photodetector based on a single Sb-doped ZnO nanobelt. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 223113. 10.1063/1.3524231View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gangloff L, Minoux E, Teo KBK, Vincent P, Semet VT, Binh VT, Yang MH, Bu IYY, Lacerda RG, Pirio G, Schnell JP, Pribat D, Hasko DG, Amaratunga GAJ, Milne WI, Legagneux P: Self-aligned, gated arrays of individual nanotube and nanowire emitters. Nano Lett 2004, 4: 1575–1579. 10.1021/nl049401tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu B, Aydil ES: Growth of oriented single-crystalline rutile TiO2 nanorods on transparent conducting substrates for dye-sensitized solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 3985–3990. 10.1021/ja8078972View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang XN, Chen YQ, Xie ZP, Yang WY: Shape and doping enhanced field emission properties of quasialigned 3C-SiC nanowires. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 8251–8255. 10.1021/jp101067fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vogel AT, Boor J, Becker M, Wittemann JV, Mensah SL, Werner P, Schmidt V: Ag-assisted CBE growth of ordered InSb nanowire arrays. Nanotechnology 2011, 22: 015605. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/1/015605View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vaddiraju S, Sunkara MK, Chin AH, Ning CZ, Dholakia GR, Meyyappan M: Synthesis of group III antimonide nanowires. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111: 7339–7347. 10.1021/jp068943rView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang YN, Chi JH, Banerjee K, Grützmacher D, Schäpers T, Lu JG: Field effect transistor based on single crystalline InSb nanowire. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 2459–2462. 10.1039/c0jm03855eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Philipose U, Sapkota G, Salfi J, Ruda HE: Influence of growth temperature on the stoichiometry of InSb nanowires grown by vapor phase transport. Semicond Sci Technol 2010, 25: 075004. 10.1088/0268-1242/25/7/075004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iwasaki H, Mizokawa Y, Nishitani R, Nakamura S: X-ray photoemission study of the initial oxidation of the cleaved (110) surfaces of GaAs, GaP and InSb. Surf Sci 1979, 86: 811–818.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Legare P, Hilaire L, Maire G: The superficial oxidation of indium, Sb and InSb(111) - a LEED, AES, XPS and UPS study. J Microsc Spectrosc Electron 1980, 5: 771–782.Google Scholar
- Tang X, Weltenis RGV, Setten FMV, Bosch AJ: Oxidation of the InSb surface at room temperature. Semicond Sci Technol 1986, 1: 355–365. 10.1088/0268-1242/1/6/004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barr TL, Ying M, Varma SJ: Detailed X-ray photoelectron-spectroscopy valence band and core level studies of select metals oxidations. Vac Sci Technol A 1992, 10: 2383–2390. 10.1116/1.577970View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohshita M: High electron mobility InSb films prepared by source-temperature-programed evaporation method. Jpn J Appl Phys 1971, 10: 1365–1371. 10.1143/JJAP.10.1365View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jin YJ, Zhang DH, Chen XZ, Tang XH: Sb antisite defects in InSb epilayers prepared by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. J Cryst Growth 2011, 318: 356–359. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.10.105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vishwakarma SR, Verma AK, Tripathi RSN, Das S, Rahul : Study of structural property of n-type indium antimonide thin films. Indian J Pure and Appl Phys 2012, 50: 339–346.Google Scholar
- Rahul , Vishwakarma SR, Verma AK, Tripathi RSN: Energy band gap and conductivity measurement of InSb thin films deposited by electron beam evaporation technique. M J Condensed Matter 2010, 13: 34–37.Google Scholar
- Lim T, Lee S, Meyyappan M, Ju S: Tin oxide and indium oxide nanowire transport characteristics: influence of oxygen concentration during synthesis. Semicond Sci Technol 2012, 27: 035018. 10.1088/0268-1242/27/3/035018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xie X, Kwok SY, Lu Z, Liu Y, Cao Y, Luo L, Zapien JA, Bello I, Lee CS, Lee ST, Zhang W: Visible–NIR photodetectors based on CdTe nanoribbons. Nanoscale 2012, 4: 2914–2919. 10.1039/c2nr30277bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chang WC, Kuo CH, Lee PJ, Chueh YL, Lin SJ: Synthesis of single crystal Sn-doped In2O3 nanowires: size-dependent conductive characteristics. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2012, 14: 13041–13045. 10.1039/c2cp41671aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stern E, Cheng G, Cimpoiasu E, Klie R, Guthrie S, Klemic J, Kretzschma I, Steinlauf E, Turner-Evans D, Broomfield E, Hyland J, Koudelka R, Boone T, Young M, Sanders A, Munden R, Lee T, Routenberg D, Reed MA: Electrical characterization of single GaN nanowires. Nanotechnology 2005, 16: 2941–2953. 10.1088/0957-4484/16/12/037View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen KK, Furdyna JK: Temperature dependence of intrinsic carrier concentration in InSb: direct determination by helicon interferometry. J Appl Phys 1825, 1972: 43.Google Scholar
- Reisfeld R: Nanosized semiconductor particles in glasses prepared by the sol–gel method: their optical properties and potential uses. J Alloys Compd 2002, 341: 56–61. 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00059-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burstein E: Anoma1ous optical absorption limit in InSb. Phys Rev 1954, 93: 632. 10.1103/PhysRev.93.632View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sakai K, Kakeno T, Ikari T, Shirakata S, Sakemi T, Awai K, Yamomoto T: Defect centers and optical absorption edge of degenerated semiconductor ZnO thin films grown by a reactive plasma deposition by means of piezoelectric photothermal spectroscopy. J Appl Phys 2006, 99: 043508. 10.1063/1.2173040View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao J, Chen R, Li DH, Jiang L, Ye JC, Ma XC, Chen XD, Xiong QH, Sun HD, Wu T: UV light emitting transparent conducting tin-doped indium oxide (ITO) nanowires. Nanotechnology 2011, 22: 195706. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/19/195706View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chang LW, Sung YC, Yeh JW, Shih HC: Enhanced optoelectronic performance from the Ti-doped ZnO nanowires. J Appl Phys 2011, 109: 074318. 10.1063/1.3554686View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang ZY, Jin CH, Liang XL, Chen Q, Peng LM: Current–voltage characteristics and parameter retrieval of semiconducting nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 073102. 10.1063/1.2177362View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan S, Sun L, Qu P, Huang N, Song Y, Xiao Z: Synthesis of uniform CdS nanowires in high yield and its single nanowire electrical property. J Solid State Chem 2009, 182: 2941–2945. 10.1016/j.jssc.2009.07.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramayya EB, Vasileska D, Goodnick SM, Knezevic I: Electron mobility in silicon nanowires. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol 2007, 6: 113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khanal DR, Levander AX, Yu KM, Liliental-Weber Z, Walukiewicz W, Grandal J, Sánchez-García MA, Calleja E, Wu J: Decoupling single nanowire mobilities limited by surface scattering and bulk impurity scattering. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 110: 033705.Google Scholar
- Wu JM, Liou LB: Room temperature photo-induced phase transitions of VO2 nanodevices. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 5499–5504. 10.1039/c0jm03203dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li ZJ, Qin Z, Zhou ZH, Zhang LY, Zhang YF: SnO2 nanowire arrays and electrical properties synthesized by fast heating a mixture of SnO2 and CNTs waste soot. Nanoscale Res Lett 2009, 4: 1434–1438. 10.1007/s11671-009-9416-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu JM, Kuo CH: A stable, low turn-on field of SnO2:Sb–SiO2 core–shell nanocable emitters. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2009, 42: 125401. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/12/125401View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu JM: Characterizing and comparing the cathodoluminesence and field emission properties of Sb doped SnO2 and SnO2 nanowires. Thin Solid Films 2008, 517: 1289–1293. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.05.052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu ZS, Deng SZ, Xu NS, Chen J, Zhou J, Chen J: Needle-shaped silicon carbide nanowires: synthesis and field electron emission properties. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 80: 3829–3831. 10.1063/1.1476703View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wong YM, Wei S, Kang WP, Davidson JL, Hormeister W, Huang JH, Cui Y: Carbon nanotubes field emission devices grown by thermal CVD with palladium as catalysts. Diamond Relat Mater 2004, 13: 2105–2112. 10.1016/j.diamond.2004.06.018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ji XH, Zhang QY, Lau SP, Jiang HX, Lin JY: Temperature-dependent photoluminescence and electron field emission properties of AlN nanotip arrays. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 173106. 10.1063/1.3126055View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hanemand D: Photoelectric emission and work functions of InSb, GaAs, Bi2Te3 and germanium. J Phys Chem Solids 1959, 11: 205–214. 10.1016/0022-3697(59)90215-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu CX, Sun XW, Chen BJ: Field emission from gallium-doped zinc oxide nanofiber array. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 84: 1540–1542. 10.1063/1.1651328View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nilsson L, Groening O, Emmenegger C, Kuettel O, Schaller E, Schlapbach L: Scanning field emission from patterned carbon nanotube films. Appl Phys Lett 2071, 2000: 76.Google Scholar
- Patra SK, Rao GM: Field emission current saturation of aligned carbon nanotube—effect of density and aspect ratio. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 100: 024319.Google Scholar
- Liu NH, Fang GJ, Zeng W, Long H, Yuan LG, Zhao XZ: Diminish the screen effect in field emission via patterned and selective edge growth of ZnO nanorod arrays. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 153505. 10.1063/1.3247887View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tang Q, Chen XH, Li T, Zhao AW, Qian YT, Yu DP, Yu WC: Template-free growth of vertically aligned CdS nanowire array exhibiting good field emission property. Chem Lett 2004, 33: 1088. 10.1246/cl.2004.1088View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.