Facile preparation of highly luminescent CdTe quantum dots within hyperbranched poly(amidoamine)s and their application in bio-imaging

  • Yunfeng Shi1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Lin Liu1Email author,

      Affiliated with

      • Huan Pang1Email author,

        Affiliated with

        • Hongli Zhou1,

          Affiliated with

          • Guanqing Zhang1,

            Affiliated with

            • Yangyan Ou1,

              Affiliated with

              • Xiaoyin Zhang1,

                Affiliated with

                • Jimin Du1 and

                  Affiliated with

                  • Wangchuan Xiao2

                    Affiliated with

                    Nanoscale Research Letters20149:115

                    DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-115

                    Received: 13 November 2013

                    Accepted: 21 February 2014

                    Published: 13 March 2014


                    A new strategy for facile preparation of highly luminescent CdTe quantum dots (QDs) within amine-terminated hyperbranched poly(amidoamine)s (HPAMAM) was proposed in this paper. CdTe precursors were first prepared by adding NaHTe to aqueous Cd2+ chelated by 3-mercaptopropionic sodium (MPA-Na), and then HPAMAM was introduced to stabilize the CdTe precursors. After microwave irradiation, highly fluorescent and stable CdTe QDs stabilized by MPA-Na and HPAMAM were obtained. The CdTe QDs showed a high quantum yield (QY) up to 58%. By preparing CdTe QDs within HPAMAM, the biocompatibility properties of HPAMAM and the optical, electrical properties of CdTe QDs can be combined, endowing the CdTe QDs with biocompatibility. The resulting CdTe QDs can be directly used in biomedical fields, and their potential application in bio-imaging was investigated.


                    Hyperbranched poly(amidoamine)s CdTe quantum dots Fluorescence Nanocomposites Bio-imaging


                    Quantum dots (QDs), also referred to as semiconductor nanocrystals, exhibit unique size and shape-dependent optical and electronic properties [17]. In recent years, significant progress has been made from the synthesis of QDs to the fabrication of nanodevices and nanostructured materials [814].

                    Until now, various ways have been developed to synthesize high-quality QDs, such as the nonaqueous trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO)/trioctylphosphine (TOP) technique [1518], the aqueous route with small thiols [2, 3, 1923] or dendritic polymers [2428] as stabilizers, and the biometric template method [29]. The fluorescent QDs stabilized by small thiols or TOPO are inherently instable and should be stabilized by matrix materials in order to realize their successful applications, while the QDs prepared with dendritic polymers as stabilizers and nanoreactors can be directly applied to many fields. The dendritic polymers have three-dimensional globular architecture, numerous cavities, and plenty of peripheral functional groups, which offer dendritic polymers the capability of in situ preparing QDs with controlled size. The QDs prepared within dendritic polymer integrate the optical, electrical properties of QDs and the biocompatibility properties of polymers together, and they are easy to form films or to assemble on substrates. However, the low-quantum yield (QY) and the broad emission spectrum of QDs prepared within dendritic polymers still need to be improved further.

                    Now, preparation of CdS QDs within dendritic polymers has been reported [2328]. However, the low QY and the broad emission spectrum of CdS QDs are still unresolved. There is also one work relating to preparing CdTe QDs within poly(amidoamine)s dendrimers (PAMAM) [30]; however, the highly fluorescence of CdTe QDs prepared within dendritic polymers has not been resolved. In our experiment, we found that if CdTe QDs were directly prepared within dendritic PAMAM without other stabilizers, they were easy to be oxidized and had very weak fluorescence even if microwave heating was used. There are also some works relating on modification of preformed CdTe QDs by dendritic PAMAM [31, 32]. By forming covalent bonds between CdTe QDs and PAMAM, CdTe/PAMAM nanocomposites were prepared. Nevertheless, this method is used for the functionalization of preformed CdTe QDs but not for in situ preparation of CdTe QDs, and the CdTe/PAMAM nanocomposites might form large aggregation or self-assembly. Compared with this route, in situ preparation of fluorescent CdTe QDs within dendritic polymers would be more convenient and effective.

                    In this paper, we propose a new method to synthesize highly fluorescent and stable CdTe QDs within hyperbranched poly(amidoamine)s (HPAMAM). HPAMAM was introduced to coat the CdTe precursors (not CdTe QDs) stabilized by mercaptopropionic sodium (MPA-Na). By this way, the growth of CdTe QDs can be further controlled, and the CdTe QDs can be endowed with biocompatibility by HPAMAM. After microwave irradiation, highly fluorescent and stable CdTe QDs stabilized by MPA-Na and HPAMAM were obtained. The resulting CdTe/HPAMAM nanocomposites combine the optical, electrical properties of CdTe QDs and the biocompatibility properties of HPAMAM together. They can be directly used in biomedical fields, and their potential application in bio-imaging was investigated.


                    HPAMAM with amine terminals was synthesized according to our previous work [14]. After endcapping by palmitoyl chloride, the weight average molecular weight (Mw) of HPAMAM measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was about 1.1 × 104 and the molecular weight polydispersity (PDI) was 2.7. CdCl2 · 2.5H2O (99%); NaBH4 (96%), tellurium powder (99.999%), and methanol were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. 3-Mercaptopropionic acid (MPA, >99%) was purchased from Fluka, St. Louis, MO, USA. The ultrapure water with 18.2 MΩ · cm was used in all experiments.

                    MPA (0.26 mL) was added to 100 mL CdCl2 (1.25 mmol) aqueous solution. After stirring for several hours, the aqueous solution was diluted to 950 mL, followed by adjusting the pH value to 8 with 1 M NaOH. After deaeration with N2 for 30 min, 50 mL oxygen-free NaHTe solution was injected at 5°C under vigorous stirring, thus CdTe precursor solution was obtained.

                    Proper amounts of HPAMAM (for example, 120 mg) was dissolved in 2 mL H2O in a one-neck flask, and then, 100 mL CdTe precursor solution was added. The mixture was deaerated with N2 for 15 min, followed by stirring for 24 h. Then, the mixture was irradiated at different times under ordinary pressure microwave (SINEO Shanghai Xinyi, Shanghai, China, 200 W, 100°C) to get a series of samples with various colors. The final CdTe/HPAMAM nanocomposites were abbreviated as CdTe/HPAMAM120. CdTe QDs prepared within 40, 80, and 200 mg HPAMAM were called CdTe/HPAMAM40, CdTe/HPAMAM80, and CdTe/HPAMAM200, respectively. The CdTe QDs stabilized by MPA-Na without HPAMAM were called CdTe/MPA-Na.

                    Cell imaging was characterized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). HeLa cells (1 × 105 cells per well) were seeded on coverslips in 12-well tissue culture plates. After incubating the cells for 24 h, the CdTe/HPAMAM120 nanocomposites (obtained on heating for 80 min) in 200 μL Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) were added into the wells and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 6 h. After washed with PBS, the cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. Then, the slides were rinsed with PBS for two times. The slides were mounted and observed by a LSM 510META.

                    No postpreparative treatment was performed on any as-prepared samples for optical characterization. pH values were measured by a Starter 3C digital pH meter, Ohaus, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), and elemental characterization were done on a JEOL 2010 microscope, Akishima-shi, Japan, with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) spectrum was taken on D/max-2550/PC X-ray diffractometer operated at 40 kV voltage and 40 mA current with Cu Ka radiation. For the XRD measurement, the CdTe QDs were rotary evaporated to remove water and then dried under vacuum. UV-visible (vis) spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 50 UV/Vis spectrometer, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA. Emission spectra were collected using a Varian Cary spectrometer. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were performed in aqueous solution at 25°C by using Zetasizer Nano S (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). The infrared measurements were performed on a Varian 800 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrometer. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed under nitrogen on a STA 409 PC thermal analyzer, Netzsch, Germany.

                    The QY of CdTe QDs was measured according to the methods described in [33] using rhodamine 6G as a reference standard (QY = 95%). The absorbance for the standard and the CdTe samples at the absorption peak and the fluorescence spectra of the same solutions excited at wavelengths of absorption peaks were measured, respectively. The area of the fluorescence spectrum from the fully corrected fluorescence spectrum was calculated. Rhodamine 6G (ethanol) and the CdTe solutions (0.03 < the absorbance at the excitation wavelength < 0.1) were used in the measurements. The QY was calculated according to the following equation:
                    φ x = φ s F x F s A s A x η x η s 2 http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-115/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_2436_Equ1_HTML.gif

                    where the subscripts s and x denote standard (rhodamine 6G) and test samples, respectively, φ is QY, F is the area of integrated fluorescence intensity, A is the absorbance at the absorption peak, and η is the refractive index of the solvent.

                    Results and discussion

                    HPAMAM have three-dimensional topological structures, many inner cavities, and a large amount of terminal functional groups. They have low cytotoxicity and have been widely used in biomedical science, such as gene transfections and drug delivery [3436]. Based on this, we proposed new preparation strategies that combine the biomedical properties of dendritic polymers with the synthesis of CdTe QDs together in this paper. HPAMAM was introduced to stabilize the CdTe precursors (not CdTe QDs). After microwave irradiation, highly fluorescent and stable CdTe QDs stabilized by MPA-Na and HPAMAM were obtained. By preparing CdTe QDs within HPAMAM, the biocompatibility properties of HPAMAM and the optical, electrical properties of CdTe QDs can be combined, endowing the CdTe QDs with biocompatibility.

                    Figure 1 gives the typical evolutions of both absorption and photoluminescence spectra of CdTe QDs prepared within HPAMAM. The CdTe QDs were obtained by irradiation every 40 min under ordinary pressure microwave. All the UV-vis spectra show well-resolved absorption peaks, and the absorption peak shifted to a longer wavelength along with the heating time, indicating the growth of CdTe QDs. The maximum peak of PL emission also shows red shift. The fluorescence color of CdTe QDs under UV light changed from green to yellow and orange with prolonging refluxed time (inset in Figure 1c). The size of CdTe QDs can be estimated from the absorption peaks using Peng's empirical formula [37]. From the absorption peaks, the Peng's empirical formula predicts that the diameter of CdTe QDs is from 2.5 to 3.5 nm. The absorption and photoluminescence spectra of CdTe QDs stabilized only by MPA-Na can be seen in Additional file 1: Figure S1 in the supporting information.
                    Figure 1

                    UV-vis absorption and PL spectra of CdTe QDs. UV-vis absorption and PL spectra (a-d) of in situ prepared CdTe QDs obtained by adding different amounts of HPAMAM and heating at various times. The inset in (c) shows fluorescent photographs of as-prepared CdTe QDs under UV irradiation. Photoluminescence spectra were recorded with excitation at 370 nm.

                    As shown in Figure 2a, the CdTe QDs prepared within different amounts of HPAMAM (40, 80, 120, and 200 mg) has a similar growth process, while the growth rate of CdTe QDs prepared with MPA-Na as stabilizers was much slower. We speculate that when HPAMAM macromolecules are added, a great amount of amines exist and part of MPA-Na might be replaced by the amines of HPAMAM. Because the surface of CdTe QDs coated by HPAMAM is not as compact as that of CdTe QDs coated by small MPA-Na molecules, the growth rate of CdTe QDs coated with HPAMAM has a more quick growth rate. As shown in Figure 2b, the CdTe QDs prepared within different amounts of HPAMAM exhibited parabola-like curves of the emission wavelength and the QYs of QDs, which were similar with the general phenomena during the growth of MPA-Na capped CdTe QDs (CdTe/MPA-Na) [3840]. From Figure 2b, we also can see that the QY of CdTe QDs is positively correlated with the content of HPAMAM added in general trend. When more HPAMAM macromolecules were added, the electrostatic interactions between the amines of HPAMAM and MPA-Na were enhanced. The HPAMAM shell acted as surface passivation ligands to get rid of surface traps caused by dangling bonds, resulting in the high QY of CdTe QDs.
                    Figure 2

                    CdTe PL peak position vs reaction time (a) and PL QYs vs PL wavelength (b). The reaction temperature was 100°C, and the amount weight of HPAMAM used for synthesizing CdTe QDs were 40, 80, 120, and 200 mg, respectively. The CdTe QDs synthesized without HPAMAM were called CdTe/MPA-Na.

                    The QY of CdTe/MPA-Na in maximum is 33%, while the best aliquot with emission maximum at 554 nm of CdTe/HPAMAM120 show a high QY up to 58%, which is almost two times of that of CdTe/MPA-Na. Consequently, we can see that HPAMAM plays very important roles in enhancing the QY of CdTe QDs. The corresponding UV-vis spectrum and PL spectrum of CdTe/HPAMAM120 with emission maximum at 554 nm can be seen in the second set of curves from top to bottom in Figure 1c, and the corresponding fluorescent photograph under UV irradiation is located in the second place in the inserted photograph of Figure 1c.

                    The stability of these highly luminescent CdTe QDs prepared within HPAMAM was investigated. After synthesis, samples taken at different reflux times were used to investigate their aqueous stability, and we found that they all showed good stability in the aqueous phase even for 1 year. No obvious precipitations were observed for these samples. Figure 3 shows the emission and absorption spectra of CdTe QDs synthesized within 120 mg HPAMAM before and after being kept for 1 year. After being kept for 1 year, the absorption of CdTe QDs (the excitonic absorption peak at 577 nm) had a slight change and the luminescence intensity increased a little. We suppose that the surface defect might be eliminated after aging, so this causes a slight increasement of luminescence intensity.
                    Figure 3

                    The absorption and emission spectra of CdTe aqueous solution. Prepared within 120 mg HPAMAM before and after being aged for 1 year. The CdTe QDs sample was synthesized by heating for 280 min, and its absorption peak was 577 nm.

                    Figure 4a presents the TEM image of CdTe/HPAMAM120 (the excitonic absorption peak at 577 nm). The particle size distribution is quite uniform, and the average diameter of CdTe QDs is about 3.4 nm. The SAED pattern inserted in Figure 4a shows that the synthesized fluorescent nanoparticles are polycrystalline. The corresponding EDS spectrum (Figure 4b) gives the signals of Cd and Te elements, confirming the existence of CdTe QDs.
                    Figure 4

                    TEM image (a) and (b) EDS spectrum of CdTe/HPAMAM120. The excitonic absorption peak at 577 nm. Inset in (a), the corresponding SAED pattern.

                    The hydrodynamic diameters of CdTe/HPAMAM120 nanocomposites and pure HPAMAM were measured by dynamic light scattering technique. Figure 5 gives the particle size distributions of pure HPAMAM and CdTe/HPAMAM120 (the excitonic absorption peak at 577 nm). It can be found that the average diameter of HPAMAM was 2.9 nm, while the CdTe/HPAMAM120 nanocomposites had an average diameter of 10.1 nm. Considering the size of HPAMAM, there is an increase of the diameter by 7.2 nm, indicating the formation of CdTe/HPAMAM assemblies. That is, the CdTe QDs were synthesized within several HPAMAM macromolecules.
                    Figure 5

                    Size distribution of HPAMAM (a) and CdTe/HPAMAM120 (the excitonic absorption peak at 577 nm) nanocomposites (b), measured by DLS.

                    Figure 6 shows XRD pattern of CdTe/HPAMAM120 (the excitonic absorption peak at 577 nm). The CdTe QDs exhibit X-ray diffraction pattern consistent with cubic (zinc blende) CdTe, as represented by the broad diffraction peaks at 24.8° (111), 41.5° (220), and 48.6° (311).
                    Figure 6

                    XRD spectrum of CdTe/HPAMAM120 (the excitonic absorption peak at 577 nm).

                    FTIR spectra of CdTe/HPAMAM120 and pure HPAMAM are shown in Figure 7. The bands at 2,929 and 2,846 cm-1 in both curves correspond to asymmetric - CH2- stretching vibration and symmetric - CH2- stretching vibration, respectively. The characteristic bands assigned to amides I and II for HPAMAM are at 1,661 and 1,557 cm-1, respectively, while the band positions of amides I and II slightly shift to 1,652 and 1,575 cm-1 for the CdTe/HPAMAM120 nanocomposites. These frequency shifts in FTIR can be attributed to the coordination interactions between CdTe QDs and HPAMAM through their amine groups.
                    Figure 7

                    FTIR spectra of HPAMAM (curve a) and CdTe/HPAMAM120 (the excitonic absorption peak at 577 nm) (curve b).

                    The composition of CdTe/HPAMAM120 was measured by TGA, and the results are shown in Figure 8. The weight loss below 200°C is due to the removal of absorbed physical and chemical water. TGA thermogram shows a great weight loss in the temperature range 200°C to 500°C, which is the range of decomposition temperature for HPAMAM. At 800°C, the weight is 42 wt.%, corresponding to the content of CdTe QDs in the CdTe/HPAMAM120 nanocomposites.
                    Figure 8

                    TGA weight loss curves of CdTe/HPAMAM120 (the excitonic absorption peak at 577 nm). The heating rate was 20°C/min.

                    To investigate the potential application of the CdTe/HPAMAM nanocomposites in bio-imaging, the CdTe/HPAMAM120 nanocomposites (the excitonic absorption peak at 527 nm) were used for HeLa cell imaging evaluated by CLSM. HPAMAM-capped CdTe QDs were seen to be internalized into HeLa cells, as shown in Figure 9. As the hyperbranched polyamines could be endocytosed by the cells [41, 42], the CdTe QDs capped by HPAMAM also can be internalized into cells without other transfection reagent. HPAMAM has been widely used in biomedical science, such as gene transfections and drug delivery, so the resulting high QY CdTe/HPAMAM nanocomposites might be well applied in gene transfection and drug delivery which can be monitored by their own fluorescent CdTe QDs.
                    Figure 9

                    Confocal micrograph of HeLa macrophage incubated with CdTe/HPAMAM120 (the excitonic absorption peak at 527 nm).


                    In conclusion, a new strategy for preparing highly luminescent CdTe QDs within amine-terminated HPAMAM was proposed in this paper. The resulting CdTe/HPAMAM nanocomposites showed a high QY up to 58%. They combined the optical, electrical properties of CdTe QDs and the biocompatibility property of HPAMAM together. They could be directly used in biomedical fields, and their potential application in bioimaging was also investigated. Potential applications in gene transfection and drug delivery may be ideal because the fluorescent CdTe QDs can be used to monitor the entire process.



                    This work is supported by the Joint Fund for Fostering Talents of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Henan Province (U1204213), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21304001, 21201010, 21205003, 21273010), the social development projects of Anyang City (2012–218), and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2012D124).

                    Authors’ Affiliations

                    School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anyang Normal University
                    School of Resources and Chemical Engineering, Sanming University


                    1. Alivisatos AP: Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science 1996, 271: 933–937. 10.1126/science.271.5251.933View Article
                    2. Gaponik N, Talapin DV, Rogach AL, Hoppe K, Shevchenko EV, Kornowski A, Eychmüller A, Weller H: Thiol-capping of CdTe nanocrystals: an alternative to organometallic synthetic routes. J Phys Chem B 2002, 106: 7177–7185.View Article
                    3. Zhou D, Lin M, Chen ZL, Sun HZ, Zhang H, Sun HC, Yang B: Simple synthesis of highly luminescent water-soluble CdTe quantum dots with controllable surface functionality. Chem Mater 2011, 23: 4857–4862. 10.1021/cm202368wView Article
                    4. Gu YP, Cui R, Zhang ZL, Xie ZX, Pang DW: Ultrasmall near-infrared Ag2Se quantum dots with tunable fluorescence for in vitro imaging. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134: 79–82. 10.1021/ja2089553View Article
                    5. Fang T, Ma KG, Ma LL, Bai JY, Li X, Song HH, Guo HQ: Mercaptobutyric acid as an effective capping agent for highly luminescent CdTe quantum dots: new insight into the selection of mercapto acids. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 12346–12352. 10.1021/jp302820uView Article
                    6. Cushing BL, Kolesnichenko VL, O’Connor CJ: Recent advances in the liquid-phase syntheses of inorganic nanoparticles. Chem Rev 2004, 104: 3893–3946. 10.1021/cr030027bView Article
                    7. Burda C, Chen X, Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA: Chemistry and properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chem Rev 2005, 105: 1025–1102. 10.1021/cr030063aView Article
                    8. Lin Y, Skaff H, Emrick T, Dinsmore AD, Russell TP: Nanoparticle assembly and transport at liquid-liquid interfaces. Science 2003, 299: 226–229. 10.1126/science.1078616View Article
                    9. Balazs AC, Emrick T, Russell TP: Nanopartical polymer composites: where two small worlds meet. Science 2006, 314: 1107–1110. 10.1126/science.1130557View Article
                    10. Tang Z, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Glotzer SC, Kotov NA: Self-assembly of CdTe nanocrystals into free-floating sheets. Science 2006, 314: 274–278. 10.1126/science.1128045View Article
                    11. Zou S, Hong R, Emrick T, Walker GC: Ordered CdSe nanoparticles within self-assembled block copolymer domains on surfaces. Langmuir 2007, 23: 1612–1614. 10.1021/la0629274View Article
                    12. Kerim M, Asfura G, Constantine CA, Lynn MJ, Thimann DA, Ji X, Leblanc RM: Characterization and 2D self-assembly of CdSe quantum dots at the air - water interface. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127: 14640–14646. 10.1021/ja0514848View Article
                    13. Reincke F, Kegel WK, Zhang H, Nolte M, Wang D, Vanmaekelbergh D, Möhwald H: Understanding the self-assembly of charged nanoparticles at the water/oil interface. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2006, 8: 3828–3835. 10.1039/b604535aView Article
                    14. Shi YF, Tu C, Zhu Q, Qian H, Ren J, Liu C, Zhu XY, Yan DY, Eric SWK, He P: Self-assembly of CdTe nanocrystals at the water–oil interface by amphiphilic hyperbranched polymers. Nanotechnology 2008, 19: 445609. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/44/445609View Article
                    15. Peng XG, Manna L, Yang WD, Wickham J, Scher E, Kadavanich A, Alivisatos AP: Shape control of CdSe nanocrystals. Nature 2000, 404: 59–61. 10.1038/35003535View Article
                    16. Murray CB, Norris DJ, Bawendi MG: Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE (E = sulfur, selenium, tellurium) semiconductor nanocrystallites. J Am Chem Soc 1993, 115: 8706–8715. 10.1021/ja00072a025View Article
                    17. Talapin DV, Rogach AL, Shevchenko EV, Kornowski A, Haase M, Weller H: Dynamic distribution of growth rates within the ensembles of colloidal II - VI and III - V semiconductor nanocrystals as a factor governing their photoluminescence efficiency. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124: 5782–5790. 10.1021/ja0123599View Article
                    18. Yu WW, Chang E, Falkner JC, Zhang JY, Al-Somali AM, Sayes CM, Johns J, Drezek R, Colvin VL: Forming biocompatible and nonaggregated nanocrystals in water using amphiphilic polymers. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129: 2871–2879. 10.1021/ja067184nView Article
                    19. Zhang H, Wang LP, Xiong HM, Hu LH, Yang B, Li W: Hydrothermal synthesis for high-quality CdTe nanocrystals. Adv Mater 2003, 15: 1712–1715. 10.1002/adma.200305653View Article
                    20. Gao MY, Kirstein S, Möhwald H, Rogach AL, Kornowski A, Eychmuller A, Weller H: Strongly photoluminescent CdTe nanocrystals by proper surface modification. J Phys Chem B 1998, 102: 8360–8363. 10.1021/jp9823603View Article
                    21. Green M, Harwood H, Barrowman C, Rahman P, Eggeman A, Festry F, Dobsonb P, Ng T: A facile route to CdTe nanoparticles and their use in bio-labelling. J Mater Chem 2007, 17: 1989–1994. 10.1039/b615871dView Article
                    22. Wang TT, Jiang XE: Size-dependent stability of water-solubilized CdTe quantum dots and their uptake mechanism by live HeLa cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013, 5: 1190–1196. 10.1021/am302234zView Article
                    23. Qian HF, Dong CQ, Weng JF, Ren JC: Facile one-pot synthesis of luminescent, water-soluble, and biocompatible glutathione-coated CdTe nanocrystals. Small 2006, 2: 747–751. 10.1002/smll.200500530View Article
                    24. Sooklal K, Hanus LH, Ploehn HJ, Murphy CJ: A blue-emitting CdS/dendrimer nanocomposite. Adv Mater 1998, 10: 1083–1087. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199810)10:14<1083::AID-ADMA1083>3.0.CO;2-BView Article
                    25. Lemon B, Crooks RM: Preparation and characterization of dendrimer-encapsulated CdS semiconductor quantum dots. J Am Chem Soc 2000, 122: 12886–12887. 10.1021/ja0031321View Article
                    26. Wu XC, Bittner AM, Kern K: Synthesis, photoluminescence, and adsorption of CdS/dendrimer nanocomposites. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109: 230–239. 10.1021/jp046072kView Article
                    27. Shi YF, Tu CL, Wang RB, Wu JL, Zhu XY, Yan DY: Preparation of CdS nanocrystals within supramolecular self-assembled nanoreactors and their phase transfer behavior. Langmuir 2008, 24: 11955–11958. 10.1021/la801952vView Article
                    28. Zhou L, Gao C, Hu XZ, Xu WJ: General avenue to multifunctional aqueous nanocrystals stabilized by hyperbranched polyglycerol. Chem Mater 2011, 23: 1461–1470. 10.1021/cm1030359View Article
                    29. Bao HF, Hao N, Yang YX, Zhao DY: Biosynthesis of biocompatible cadmium telluride quantum dots using yeast cells. Nano Res 2010, 3: 481–489. 10.1007/s12274-010-0008-6View Article
                    30. Ghosh S, Priyam A, Chatterjee A, Saha A: Size tunablity of CdTe crystallites in dendrimer nanocomposites and temperature dependent focusing of size distribution. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2008, 8: 5952–5957. 10.1166/jnn.2008.323View Article
                    31. Liu JA, Wei XL, Cao JH, Jiang H: CdTe quantum dots modified by polyamidoamine dendrimers for cell imaging. E J Chem 2012, 9: 171–174. 10.1155/2012/195897View Article
                    32. Zeng YL, Tang CR, Tian G, Yi PG, Huang H, Hu N, Li S, Huang HW, Li X, Lin BG, Yu XY, Ling YL, Xia XD: A controlled approach for synthesizing CdTe quantum dots polyamidoamine nanocomposites. Chem Eng J 2010, 156: 524–527. 10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.019View Article
                    33. Crosby GA, Demas JN: Measurement of photoluminescence quantum yields review. J Phys Chem 1971, 75: 991–1024. 10.1021/j100678a001View Article
                    34. Zhou YF, Huang W, Liu JY, Zhu XY, Yan DY: Self-assembly of hyperbranched polymers and its biomedical applications. Adv Mater 2010, 22: 4567–4590. 10.1002/adma.201000369View Article
                    35. Wang RB, Zhou LZ, Zhou YF, Li GL, Zhu XY, Gu HC, Jiang XL, Li HQ, Wu JL, He L, Guo XQ, Zhu BS, Yan DY: Synthesis and gene delivery of poly(amido amine)s with different branched architecture. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11: 489–495. 10.1021/bm901215sView Article
                    36. Chen Y, Zhou LZ, Pang Y, Huang W, Qiu F, Jiang XL, Zhu XY, Yan DY, Chen Q: Photoluminescent hyperbranched poly(amido amine) containing β-cyclodextrin as a nonviral gene delivery vector. Bioconjug Chem 2011, 22: 1162–1170. 10.1021/bc200010wView Article
                    37. Yu WW, Qu LH, Guo WZ, Peng XG: Experimental determination of the extinction coefficient of CdTe, CdSe, and CdS nanocrystals. Chem Mater 2003, 15: 2854–2860. 10.1021/cm034081kView Article
                    38. Qu L, Peng X: Control of photoluminescence properties of CdSe nanocrystals in growth. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124: 2049–2055. 10.1021/ja017002jView Article
                    39. Guo J, Yang W, Wang C: Systematic study of the photoluminescence dependence of thiol-capped CdTe nanocrystals on the reaction conditions. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109: 17467–17473. 10.1021/jp044770zView Article
                    40. Shavel A, Gaponik N, Eychmüller A: Factors governing the quality of aqueous CdTe nanocrystals: calculations and experiment. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110: 19280–19284. 10.1021/jp063351uView Article
                    41. Zhu K, Guo CF, Lai H, Yang WL, Wang CS: Novel hyperbranched polyamidoamine nanoparticle based gene delivery: transfection, cytotoxicity and in vitro evaluation. Int J Pharm 2012, 423: 378–383. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.12.030View Article
                    42. Shi YF, Du JM, Zhou LZ, Li XT, Zhou YH, Li LL, Zhu XY: Size-controlled preparation of magnetic iron oxide nanocrystals within hyperbranched polymers and their magnetofection in vitro. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 355–360. 10.1039/c1jm14079eView Article


                    © shi et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

                    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.