Optimum deposition conditions of ultrasmooth silver nanolayers
© Stefaniuk et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 7 January 2014
Accepted: 22 March 2014
Published: 31 March 2014
Reduction of surface plasmon-polariton losses due to their scattering on metal surface roughness still remains a challenge in the fabrication of plasmonic devices for nanooptics. To achieve smooth silver films, we study the dependence of surface roughness on the evaporation temperature in a physical vapor deposition process. At the deposition temperature range 90 to 500 K, the mismatch of thermal expansion coefficients of Ag, Ge wetting layer, and sapphire substrate does not deteriorate the metal surface. To avoid ice crystal formation on substrates, the working temperature of the whole physical vapor deposition process should exceed that of the sublimation at the evaporation pressure range. At optimum room temperature, the root-mean-square (RMS) surface roughness was successfully reduced to 0.2 nm for a 10-nm Ag layer on sapphire substrate with a 1-nm germanium wetting interlayer. Silver layers of 10- and 30-nm thickness were examined using an atomic force microscope (AFM), X-ray reflectometry (XRR), and two-dimensional X-ray diffraction (XRD2).
63.22.Np Layered systems; 68. Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and nanosystems (structure and nonelectronic properties); 81.07.-b Nanoscale materials and structures: fabrication and characterization
KeywordsThin films Plasmonics Roughness Physical vapor deposition Nanooptics
Surface plasmon-polariton (SPP) waves excited on a metal-dielectric interface allow the control and manipulation of light at nanoscale dimensions . The propagation range of SPPs on a metal-dielectric interface is limited due to ohmic losses and scattering on random and intended interface irregularities [2–4]. Ohmic losses of free electrons depend on the SPP frequency range and the temperature of the structure and thus cannot be ultimately reduced. Therefore, further development of plasmonic devices is possible via reduction of scattering losses of SPPs. In order to limit scattering on a patterned metal surface, an idea to control the flow of light on a metal-dielectric interface through structuring the dielectric layer or modification of the permittivity tensor of the dielectric side of the structure was proposed [5, 6]. However, random surface roughness and metal islands induce scattering on both structured and flat surfaces and thus deteriorate functioning of plasmonic devices [7–9].
It was shown in experiments that surface plasmon losses in various plasmonic structures are virtually insensitive to temperature change. A PMMA/Ta2O5/Au multilayer on glass substrate has almost the same transmission spectrum at wavelength range 550 to 800 nm measured in temperatures from 80 to 350 K . The decrease of electrical resistivity of silver with the reduction of temperature does not influence the surface plasmon loss. The imaginary part of electric permittivity of silver, which is inversely proportional to the ohmic conductivity, changes with temperature but depends mostly on the silver film thickness. Thus, it is not the ohmic losses due to electron scattering in silver but the temperature-independent morphology of the silver surface that decides on losses due to scattering into free space . The above conclusion is in agreement with recently observed maxima in the visible range of the transmittance spectra of Ag/MgF2/Ag , Ag/ITO/Ag , and ZnO/Ag/ZnO  multilayers, which clearly depend on Ag surface morphology.
Heteroepitaxial deposition of ultrasmooth noble metal layers on crystalline or glass substrates is described with one of two ideal growth manners. In the Frank-van der Merwe deposition mode, the process begins with atom-thick islands, which dilate, connect, and eventually form continuous layers. In the Stranski-Krastanov (SK) growth, after the first few layers are formed, the nucleation of island begins because of strains and diffusivity of adatoms. In electron beam deposition processes, an atom evaporating from a hot crucible (about 1,200 K) arrives onto a substrate kept at room temperature (RT) and slowly loses its kinetic energy. Diffusivity of metal adatoms on the surface diminishes with decreasing substrate temperature. Thus, cooling the substrates to cryogenic temperatures should in principle lead to ultrasmooth layers.
The role of surface diffusivity of Ag adatoms in the formation of islands and then grains was demonstrated by Jing et al. in STM measurements, where with increasing layer thickness the silver clusters were more and more pronounced . The same authors observed that deposition of 12 monolayers of silver at 190 K results in an increase of island densities by 4 orders of magnitude in comparison to that obtained at RT. At the same time, silver atom clusters were at least 1 order of magnitude smaller. The diffusivity of Ag adatoms is reduced with an amorphous 1-nm Ge interlayer [15–17], 5-nm layer of chromium , or 1-nm film of Ti . A 2-nm nickel layer is nearly as efficient in metal layer smoothing as germanium, which moreover enhances the surface plasmon resonance sensitivity of the Ag layer . Recently, a 1-nm-thick copper seed layer was also reported to be effective in smoothing silver nanolayers . When a continuous 6-nm Ag layer on 1 nm of Ge is sequentially deposited on fused silica substrate without breaking the chamber vacuum, a silver surface roughness of root-mean-square (RMS) = 0.6 nm is achievable . In Ag/MgF2/Ag on quartz with a Ge seed growth layer, the roughness of the silver surface considerably modifies the reflectance spectra . In our recent paper , we proved that the smoothness of Ag/Ge, Ag/Ni, and Ag/Ti films - that is, reduction of losses on scattering - is achieved at the cost of increased specific resistance - that is, increase of ohmic losses in the skin depth-thick layer of silver.
In this article, we discuss methods to achieve ultrasmooth silver nanolayers on sapphire substrate with germanium interlayer by optimizing the temperature for the range of evaporation pressures. Roughness results from island evaporation which is related to the surface diffusivity of Ag adatoms. Therefore, we investigate the influence of substrate temperature on the surface diffusivity of adatoms.
Electron-beam physical vapor deposition
We deposited polycrystalline silver films with an electron-beam evaporator (PVD75, Lesker, Hastings, UK). Epi-polished c-plane (0001)-oriented sapphire wafers with nominal roughness RMS = 0.2 nm were used as substrates. Before deposition, the substrates were bombarded with argon ions with 105 eV energy and 0.2 mA/cm2 beam density for 30 s. Before evaporation, both the substrate holder and the chamber walls were heated for 12 h at 420 and 330 K, respectively. A germanium adhesion layer (1 nm) and silver layers (10 and 30 nm) were sequentially evaporated at the same temperature and at a deposition rate equal to 0.05 nm/s without breaking the vacuum. To minimize absolute humidity (defined as the ratio of mass of water vapor to volume of vapor/air mixture) in the vacuum chamber, we reduced the pressure to the lowest achievable level 5 × 10−8 Torr. During the process of Ge and Ag evaporation lasting a few minutes, the pressure has increased by 1 order of magnitude. For the period of the deposition of films, the vacuum chamber was kept at RT and the temperature of a custom-made sample holder module was controlled in the range 90 to 500 K with 10−1 K accuracy. The upper part of the module had liquid nitrogen (LN2) temperature and worked as a cold trap, which reduced substrate contamination and improved the vacuum within the chamber. The temperature of the lower part was measured using two platinum sensors (PT-103, Lake Shore Cryotronics, Westerville, OH, USA), the first located inside the holder in a drilled channel and the second attached to the holder surface. For heating, a twin core wire with cold ends (Thermocoax, Suresnes, France) was used with regulated power supply (Cryogenic Temperature Controller 335, Lake Shore Cryotronics). During the deposition, the substrate temperature increased by, at most, 5° due to radiation from the crucible. After deposition, the cryostat and the samples reached RT in a natural heat exchange process lasting up to 12 h and then the chamber was filled with nitrogen. Before morphology characterization in ambient conditions, the samples were kept in an Ar (6 N) atmosphere.
Scanned AFM images
Atomic force microscope (AFM) measurements under tapping mode in air were carried out utilizing an Ntegra NT-MDT microscope (Moscow, Russia) equipped with sharp etalon probes with 10-nm tip curvature radius and 5:1 aspect ratio. Such probes are characterized by highly reproducible parameters: typical dispersion of probe resonant frequency is ±10% and typical dispersion of force constant is ±20%. The resonant frequency of the probes is equal to 140 kHz, which corresponds to a force constant of 3.5 N/m. To calibrate AFM scanner movements along the z-axis, highly oriented pyrolytic graphite was used. Calibration in the lateral direction was performed using a three-dimensional array of rectangles with 3-μm period.
X-ray reflectometry and diffractometry
The structure of thin films was analyzed by X-ray reflectometry; the measurements were performed using the Bruker Discover D8 X-ray diffractometer (Madison, WI, USA) with Cu Kα line source of wavelength 0.15405 nm and point detector. The monochromatic parallel beam was formed by a parabolic Goebel mirror. The data analysis was based on finding the proper electron density profile, whose Fourier transform would match the recorded X-ray reflectometry (XRR) pattern. To fit the data, a ‘box model’ was used. Data fitting was performed using Leptos 4.02 software package provided by Bruker. The thickness and density of Ag and Ge layers as well as Ge/Ag and Ag/air surface roughness were free parameters in the fitting procedure. The wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were done with the Bruker GADDS system equipped with 2D Vantec 2000 detector.
Results and discussion
Effect of thermal expansion
Deposition of metal layers on cooled dielectric substrates poses a question about the relationship between the dimensional stability of structures and temperature change. A mismatch of thermal expansion coefficients of layers gives rise to intrinsic stress that may result in metal film cracking. The thermal expansion coefficient of silver αAg varies from 13.38 at 85 K to 18.8 [μm/m K] at RT . At temperatures from 90 to 295 K, the expansion coefficient of sapphire αsapphire in the (0001) plane increases from 3.3 to 6.5 [μm/m K] . The temperature difference between the cooled substrates and RT (at which samples are usually removed from the vacuum chamber) can be as much as 200°.
To assess the influence of thermal expansion on deposited metal layers, the same Ag layer sample deposited at RT was characterized in two cases: once just after deposition and the second time after rapid cooling down to 90 K and heating back to RT in N2 flow in ambient conditions. In AFM images, we measured three surface morphology parameters of the sample: the ten-point height value given as the difference between five maximal peaks and five minimal hollows, average height value, and RMS roughness. In spite of LN2 cooling, both the granularity and roughness of the silver film remained nearly the same and the temperature change did not cause any cracks.
Effect of cooling substrates
While thermal expansion of materials involved in the deposition process has a negligible influence on Ag film roughness, we decide to cool down the substrates and thus reduce the surface diffusivity of adatoms. The diffusivity of Ag adatoms was preliminarily reduced due to an intermediate 1-nm-thick wetting layer of germanium . In the vacuum chamber during the deposition process, the specific humidity (defined as the ratio of mass of water vapor to unit mass of dry air) is kept constant in spite of the pressure decrease. However, when the substrate is rapidly cooled with LN2, this specific humidity considerably decreases because most of the water vapor condenses on cooled parts and freezes forming ice crystals of a size reaching single nanometers. In our custom-made substrate holder module, most of the residual humidity did not deposit on the substrates with controlled temperature but on the walls of the LN2 vessel, which was the coldest element in the vacuum chamber and worked as a cold trap. Nevertheless, silver was deposited on the ice crystal-covered substrate, which no longer has flatness RMS = 0.2 nm.
AFM scan parameters of 9 × 9 μm 2 area of 30-nm-thick Ag layer
Ten-point height [nm]
Average height [nm]
RMS roughness [nm]
Effect of water ice crystallization
Cooling leads to the formation of water ice crystals on substrates at temperatures lower than sublimation phase transition at pressures below the water triple point in its phase diagram.
Sublimation-pressure empirical equation coefficients
−0.212144006 × 102
0.273203819 × 102
−0.610598130 × 101
0.333333333 × 10−2
0.120666667 × 101
0.170333333 × 101
To assure proper adhesion of the deposited material to a Ge-wetted substrate surface and to avoid water ice crystal growth, which leads to the increase of substrate roughness, the system should operate at the lowest possible pressures and all the time on the high temperature side of the p-T diagram shown in Figure 3.
Optimum deposition temperature
The morphology of crystalline 30-nm-thick Ag layers was analyzed using two-dimensional X-ray diffraction (XRD2). The XRD2 pattern from one of the 30-nm-thick Ag samples deposited at 295 K has a bright spot from the double-sided epi-polished Al2O3 single-crystal substrate oriented in c-plane (0001) and the weak arc from silver nanocrystallites with periodicity 3.88 Å and random orientation in space (see Additional file 1). Similar XRD2 patterns were obtained also for 10-nm-thick Ag films deposited at temperatures in the range 200 to 350 K.
A new sublimation-pressure empirical equation valid in the range from 50 K to Tt = 273.16 K of the triple point helps select the optimum temperature in high-vacuum physical vapor deposition systems. We have demonstrated the possibility to fabricate ultrasmooth metal nanolayers deposited onto epi-polished substrates at the lowest achievable pressure and at such a temperature that the whole dynamic range of both parameters is located on the gas side of the phase-boundary curve of water in a p-T diagram. The temperature range 230 to 350 K is established as the optimum for deposition of Ag nanolayers using e-beam evaporators. For the 10-nm Ag film on 1-nm Ge interlayer deposited at RT on sapphire substrate, a surface roughness with RMS = 0.22 nm has been achieved. For 30-nm-thick Ag films on sapphire substrate with 1-nm Ge wetting layer, RMS increases up to 0.49 nm. The ten-point height parameter given by extreme local surface features, which reflects scattering properties, has its minimum at 295 K. The achieved reduction of random surface roughness decreases the scattering losses of the propagating SPP wave and thus increases the useful area of metal-dielectric interface in plasmonic devices.
atomic force microscope
scanning tunneling microscope
two-dimensional X-ray diffraction.
The authors acknowledge the support from the Polish National Centre for R&D under projects N R15 0018 06 and PBS1/A5/27/2012.
- Halas NJ, Lal S, Chang W-S, Link S, Nordlander P: Plasmons in strongly coupled metallic nanostructures. Chem Rev 2011, 111: 3913–3961. 10.1021/cr200061kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mayy M, Zhu G, Mayy E, Webb A, Noginov MA: Low temperature studies of surface plasmon polaritons in silver films. J Appl Phys 2012, 111: 094103. 10.1063/1.4709751View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cioarec C, Melpignano P, Gherardi N, Clergereaux R, Villeneuve C: Ultrasmooth silver thin film electrodes with high polar liquid wettability for OLED microcavity application. Langmuir 2011, 27: 3611–3617. 10.1021/la104760aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ke L, Lai SC, Liu H, Peh CKN, Wang B, Teng JH: Ultrasmooth silver thin film on PEDOT:PSS nucleation layer for extended surface plasmon propagation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2012, 4: 1247–1253. 10.1021/am201391fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Zentgraf T, Bartal G, Zhang X: Transformational plasmon optics. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 1991–1997. 10.1021/nl1008019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huidobro PA, Nesterov ML, Martin-Moreno L, Garcia-Vidal FJ: Transformation optics for plasmonics. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 1985–1990. 10.1021/nl100800cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawata S, Inouye Y, Verma P: Plasmonics for near-field nano-imaging and superlensing. Nat Photonics 2009, 3: 388–394. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gramotnev DK, Bozhevolnyi SI: Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit. Nat Photonics 2010, 4: 83–91. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.282View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berini P, De Leon I: Surface plasmon-polariton amplifiers and lasers. Nat Photonics 2012, 6: 16–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bouillard J-SG, Dickson W, O'Connor DP, Wurtz GA, Zayats AV: Low-temperature plasmonics of metallic nanostructures. Nano Lett 2012, 12: 1561–1565. 10.1021/nl204420sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leong ESP, Liu YJ, Wang B, Teng J: Effect of surface morphology on the optical properties in metal-dielectric-metal thin film systems. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2011, 3: 1148–1153. 10.1021/am101278qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun ZQ, Zhang MC, Xia QP, He G, Song XP: Microstructure and optical properties of Ag/ITO/Ag multilayer films. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 424. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-424View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiu PK, Cho WH, Chen HP, Hsiao CN, Yang JR: Study of a sandwich structure of transparent conducting oxide films prepared by electron beam evaporation at room temperature. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 304. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-304View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jing DP, Unal B, Qin FL, Yuen C, Evans JW, Jenks CJ, Sordelet DJ, Thiel PA: Stranski-Krastanov-like growth of an Ag film on a metallic glass. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517: 6486–6492. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.203View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Logeeswaran VJ, Kobayashi NP, Islam MS, Wu W, Chaturvedi P, Fang NX, Wang SY, Williams RS: Ultrasmooth silver thin films deposited with a germanium nucleation layer. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 178–182. 10.1021/nl8027476View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loncaric M, Sancho-Parramon J, Pavlovic M, Zorc H, Dubcek P, Turkovic A, Bernstorff S, Jakopic G, Haase A: Optical and structural characterization of silver islands films on glass substrates. Vacuum 2010, 84: 188–192.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flötotto D, Wang ZM, Jeurgens LPH, Bischoff E, Mittemeijer EJ: Effect of adatom surface diffusivity on microstructure and intrinsic stress evolutions during Ag film growth. J Appl Phys 2012, 112: 043503–1-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Melpignano P, Cioarec C, Clergereaux R, Gherardi N, Villeneuve C, Datas L: E-beam deposited ultra-smooth silver thin film on glass with different nucleation layers: an optimization study for OLED micro-cavity application. Org Electron 2010, 11: 1111–1119. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.03.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stefaniuk T, Wróbel P, Trautman P, Szoplik T: Ultrasmooth metal nanolayers for plasmonic applications: surface roughness and specific resistivity. Appl Opt 2014, 53: B237-B241. 10.1364/AO.53.00B237View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu H, Wang B, Leong ESP, Yang P, Zong Y, Si G, Teng J, Maier SA: Enhanced surface plasmon resonance on a smooth silver film with a seed growth layer. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 3139–3146. 10.1021/nn100466pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Formica N, Ghosh DS, Carrilero A, Chen TL, Simpson RE, Pruneri V: Ultrastable and atomically smooth ultrathin silver films grown on a copper seed layer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013, 5: 3048–3053. 10.1021/am303147wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen W, Thoreson MD, Ishii S, Kildishev AV, Shalaev VM: Ultra-thin ultra-smooth and low-loss silver films on a germanium wetting layer. Opt Express 2010, 18: 5124–5134. 10.1364/OE.18.005124View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- White GK, Collins JG: Thermal expansion of copper, silver, and gold at low temperatures. J Low Temperature Phys 1972, 7: 43–75. 10.1007/BF00629120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dobrovinskaia ER, Lytvynov LA, Pishchik VV: Sapphire: Material, Manufacturing, Applications. New York: Springer; 2009.Google Scholar
- Wagner W, Riethmann T, Feistel R, Harvey AH: New equations for the sublimation pressure and melting pressure of H2O ice Ih. J Phys Chem Ref Data 2011, 40: 043103–1-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang Z, Narimanov EE: Zeroth-order transmission resonance in hyperbolic metamaterials. Opt Express 2013, 21: 15020–15025. 10.1364/OE.21.015020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tumkur TU, Kitur JK, Chu B, Gu L, Podolskiy VA, Narimanov EE, Noginov MA: Control of reflectance and transmittance in scattering and curvilinear hyperbolic metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 101: 091105. 10.1063/1.4746387View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fang N, Lee H, Sun C, Zhang X: Sub-diffraction-limited optical imaging with a silver superlens. Science 2005, 308: 534–537. 10.1126/science.1108759View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wróbel P, Pniewski J, Antosiewicz TJ, Szoplik T: Focusing radially polarized light by a concentrically corrugated silver film without a hole. Phys Rev Lett 2009, 102: 183902.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kotyński R, Stefaniuk T: Multiscale analysis of subwavelength imaging with metal-dielectric multilayers. Opt Lett 2010, 35: 1133–1135. 10.1364/OL.35.001133View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kotyński R, Baghdasaryan H, Stefaniuk T, Pastuszczak A, Marciniak M, Lavrinenko A, Panajotov K, Szoplik T: Sensitivity of imaging properties of metal-dielectric layered flat lens to fabrication inaccuracies. Opto-Electron Rev 2010, 18: 446–457. 10.2478/s11772-010-0051-6Google Scholar
- Shivanand S, Ludwig A, Webb KJ: Impact of surface roughness on the effective dielectric constants and subwavelength image resolution of metal–insulator stack lenses. Opt Lett 2012, 37: 4317–4319.Google Scholar
- Guo J, Adato R: Extended long range plasmon waves in finite thickness metal film and layered dielectric materials. Opt Express 2006, 14: 12409–12418. 10.1364/OE.14.012409View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adato R, Guo J: Characteristics of ultra-long range surface plasmon waves at optical frequencies. Opt Express 2007, 15: 5008–5017. 10.1364/OE.15.005008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.