Optical gain in 1.3-μm electrically driven dilute nitride VCSOAs

  • Sefer Bora Lisesivdin1, 2Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Nadir Ali Khan1, 5,

      Affiliated with

      • Simone Mazzucato1,

        Affiliated with

        • Naci Balkan1,

          Affiliated with

          • Michael John Adams1,

            Affiliated with

            • Ville-Markus Korpijärvi3,

              Affiliated with

              • Mircea Guina3,

                Affiliated with

                • Gabor Mezosi4 and

                  Affiliated with

                  • Marc Sorel4

                    Affiliated with

                    Nanoscale Research Letters20149:22

                    DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-22

                    Received: 17 October 2013

                    Accepted: 17 December 2013

                    Published: 13 January 2014


                    We report the observation of room-temperature optical gain at 1.3 μm in electrically driven dilute nitride vertical cavity semiconductor optical amplifiers. The gain is calculated with respect to injected power for samples with and without a confinement aperture. At lower injected powers, a gain of almost 10 dB is observed in both samples. At injection powers over 5 nW, the gain is observed to decrease. For nearly all investigated power levels, the sample with confinement aperture gives slightly higher gain.


                    Dilute nitride Optical injection Gain Vertical cavity semiconductor optical amplifiers


                    In x Ga1-xAs1-yN y semiconductor alloy was first proposed by Kondow et al. in 1996 [1], and considerable research attention has been devoted to this alloy system due to its possible optoelectronic applications at an operating wavelength of 1.3 μm. With the addition of small amounts of nitrogen into the (In)GaAs lattice, a strong electron confinement and bandgap reduction are obtained. Furthermore, addition of N allows band engineering, allowing the device operating wavelength range to extend up to 1.6 μm [2]. An extensive set of different devices based on this alloy has been fabricated and demonstrated [3]. Examples of these devices are vertical cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs) [46], vertical external cavity surface-emitting lasers [7, 8], solar cells [8, 9], edge-emitting lasers [10], photodetectors [11], semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) [12], and vertical cavity semiconductor optical amplifiers (VCSOAs) [13, 14].

                    VCSOAs can be seen as the natural evolution of SOAs, which, owing to their fast response, reduced size, and low-threshold nonlinear behavior, are popular in applications such as optical routing, signal regeneration, and wavelength shifting. Within these fields, VCSOAs have been used as optical preamplifiers, switches, and interconnects [1517]. Their geometry provides numerous advantages over the edge-emitting counterpart SOAs, including low noise figure, circular emission, polarization insensitivity, possibility to build high-density two-dimensional arrays of devices that are easy to test on wafer, and low-power consumption that is instrumental for high-density photonic integrated circuits. Generally speaking, a VCSOA is a modified version of a VCSEL that is driven below lasing threshold. The first experimental study of an In x Ga1-xAs1-yN y /GaAs-based VCSOA was reported in 2002 [18], with a theoretical analysis published in 2004 [19]. Several studies on optically pumped In x Ga1-xAs1-yN y VCSOAs have been published [14, 2023], while electrically driven VCSOAs have been demonstrated only in ‘Hellish’ configuration [24]. The present contribution builds on these technological developments to focus on an electrically driven multifunction standard VCSOA device operating in the 1.3-μm wavelength window.


                    The amplification properties of In x Ga1-xAs1-yN y VCSOAs were studied using a 1,265- to 1,345-nm tunable laser (TL; TLM-8700-H-O, Newport Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA), whose output was sent to the sample using the setup shown in Figure 1a. The TL signal was split via a 10/90 coupler to a power meter and to the sample, respectively. Back reflections were avoided using an optical isolator while the TL power was changed from 0 to 7 mW using an optical attenuator. A lens-ended fiber (SMF-28 fiber, conical lens with cone angle of 80° to 90° and radius of 6.0 ±1.0 μm) was used to focus the TL light to the sample surface as well as to collect its reflected/emitted/amplified light, which was then directed to an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA). The VCSOA was electrically DC biased up to 10 mA and stabilized in temperature at 20°C via a Peltier cooler.
                    Figure 1

                    Experimental setup (a) and the layer structure of the investigated samples (b).

                    The investigated VCSOA structure with a 3.5λ cavity is shown in Figure 1b. The structures were grown by a solid source molecular beam epitaxy reactor with a radio frequency plasma source for incorporating nitrogen. The growth was carried on an n-type GaAs(100) substrate, and the bottom and top distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) were doped with silicon (n-type) and beryllium (p-type), respectively. The two DBRs comprised 21 and 24 pairs of Al x Ga1-xAs/GaAs layers for the top and bottom DBR, respectively. The Al concentrations were x = 0.8 and 0.98 in the top and bottom DBRs, respectively. The confinement aperture, which is required for better carrier and light confinement, was defined in the uppermost layer of the bottom DBR. The active region contains three stacks of three 7-nm-thick In0.35Ga0.65As0.975 N0.025 quantum wells separated by 20-nm thick GaAs spacers. A set of several VCSOA samples was fabricated, having different dimensions of the top DBR mirror radius (R1), confinement aperture radius (R2), and bottom DBR radius (R3) for cases with and without the confinement aperture. In this paper, we compare the results obtained for two samples with and without confinement aperture, with R1 = 5 μm, R2 = 25 μm, and R3 = 50 μm.

                    Results and discussion

                    Room-temperature reflectivity and photoluminescence (PL) measurements were performed on the as-grown sample, and the results are shown in Figure 2. Simulated reflection is also shown in the figure. Two resonances λR1 and λR2 are observed within the DBR stop band as a result of the relatively long cavity length [25]. The principle resonance, which is designed for 1.3-μm operation, is observed at λR1 = 1,282 nm, while the other unwanted resonance at lower wavelength is observed at λR2 = 1,235 nm. Figure 3 shows the VCSOA amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) spectra obtained with no optical injection at different applied bias currents of 0 to 10 mA for the sample without confinement aperture. The highest ASE power peak appears at 1,288 nm and is blue-shifted with respect to that of the lasing cavity mode wavelength [26, 27]. The other modes are also consistent with the PL spectra. Figure 3 shows that with increasing the bias current, the amplitude of each mode increases and also slightly shifts towards higher wavelengths. This shift is associated with local temperature increase in the device. A similar result was observed in the VCSOA with the confinement aperture.
                    Figure 2

                    Room temperature photoluminescence (red) and reflectance spectra of the studied structure. Experimental and simulated reflectivity spectra of the studied VCSOA structure are shown in black and blue lines, respectively.

                    Figure 3

                    Power spectra of VCSOA without confinement aperture obtained for different bias currents.

                    Since no significant change in the spectrum amplitude above 7 mA was observed, we investigated the devices up to this current value. ASE power spectra taken at 7 and 0 mA (ASE0) are used to extract the spectrum ASE - ASE0, which is the spectrum where the background noise is minimized. To find the amplified optical signal (AOS), we injected light sweeping the TL wavelength (λinj) from 1,266 to 1,310 nm with a 7-mA current bias. Figure 4 shows results for injection at λinj =1,279 nm only. We could not investigate the second resonance peak λR2 because of the wavelength limit of the TL. In Figure 4a,b,c,d, the results for ASE - ASE0, AOS + ASE, AOS + ASE - ASE0, and finally AOS - ASE0spectra are shown, respectively.
                    Figure 4

                    Results of various power spectra for λ inj = 1,279 nm. (a) ASE - ASE0level, (b) AOS + ASE, (c) AOS + ASE - ASE0, and (d) AOS - ASE0 power spectra.

                    As the gain is small, the amplified signal cannot be easily discerned in Figure 4d. Hence, the gain was calculated using the simple relation
                    Gain = AOS + ASE AS E 0 AOS AS E 0 http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-22/MediaObjects/11671_2013_Article_1815_Equ1_HTML.gif
                    for each wavelength after obtaining AOS and ASE data. Results are shown as a function of the injected wavelength in Figure 5 for a specific laser power (Pinj) of 2.25 nW. A maximum gain of 3 dB with a very broad peak is observed at the maximum ASE wavelength of 1,288.5 nm. In the study, measured signal levels are very near to limits of the OSA; therefore, larger bandwidth wavelength values are used, which can be the reason of the broadness of the gain peak.
                    Figure 5

                    Gain versus injected laser wavelength with P inj = 2.25 nW.

                    Having verified that the gain peak corresponds to the ASE peak wavelength, we investigated the Pinj dependence by varying it from 1.5 nW to a few milliwatts for the single wavelength of 1,288.5 nm. Results are presented for both samples with and without confinement aperture in Figure 6 for power values below 10 nW. For injected laser powers over 5 nW, the gain falls rapidly. At the lowest injected power, the sample with confinement aperture exhibits 10 dB of gain, which is observed near the maximum ASE wavelength. For the investigated injected power range, the sample with the confinement aperture showed a higher gain because of the better carrier and light confinement in the VCSOA.
                    Figure 6

                    Power-dependent gain for the samples with and without confinement aperture.


                    In this paper, we report the observation of gain in an electrically driven dilute nitride VCSOA device operated at 1.3-μm in reflection mode. Two different types of samples with and without confinement aperture are investigated. The ASE power peak is found to be at 1,288.5 nm with additional modes, which are caused by the length of the cavity. Optical gain is found to occur at low optical injection values. Above 5 nW of optical injection, the gain is found to fall rapidly. The maximum observed optical gain is observed at 1,288.5 nm at room temperature. The maximum observed optical gain at 7-mA current at room temperature is around 10 and 6 dB for samples with and without confinement aperture, respectively. It is important to mention that despite the small gain, the device is very promising because it requires very small currents compared with in-plane SOAs.



                    Support from EPSRC under grant EP/G023972/1 is gratefully acknowledged. Sefer Bora Lisesivdin also acknowledges partial support from the Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council (TUBITAK) 2219 coded scholarship. COST Action MP0805 is also gratefully acknowledged.

                    Authors’ Affiliations

                    School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex
                    Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Gazi University
                    Optoelectronics Research Centre (ORC), Tampere University of Technology
                    School of Engineering, University of Glasgow
                    Kohat University of Science and Technology (KUST)


                    1. Kondow M, Uomi K, Niwa A, Kitatani T, Watahiki S, Yazawa Y: GaInNAs: a novel material for long-wavelength-range laser diodes with excellent high-temperature performance. Jpn J Appl Phys 1996, 35: 1273–1275. 10.1143/JJAP.35.1273View Article
                    2. Balkan N: The physics and technology of dilute nitrides. J Phys Condens Matter 2004. doi:10.1088/0953–8984/16/31/E01 doi:10.1088/0953-8984/16/31/E01
                    3. Erol A (Springer Series in Materials Science 105). In Dilute III-V Nitride Semiconductors and Material Systems: Physics and Technology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2008.View Article
                    4. Forchel A, Reinhardt M, Fischer M: A monolithic GaInAsN vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser for the 1.3-μm regime. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2000, 12: 1313–1315.View Article
                    5. Jouhti T, Okhotnikov O, Konttinen J, Gomes LA, Peng CS, Karirinne S, Pavelescu E-M, Pessa M: Dilute nitride vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers. New J Phys 2003, 5: 841–846.View Article
                    6. Schires K, Al Seyab R, Hurtado A, Korpijarvi V-M, Guina M, Henning ID, Adams MJ: Optically-pumped dilute nitride spin-VCSEL. Opt Exp 2012, 20: 3550–3555. 10.1364/OE.20.003550View Article
                    7. Hopkins JM, Smith SA, Jeon CW, Sun HD, Burns D, Calvez S, Dawson MD, Jouhti T, Pessa M: 0.6 W CW GaInNAs vertical external-cavity surface emitting laser operating at 1.32 μm. IET Electr. Lett 2004, 40: 30–31. 10.1049/el:20040049View Article
                    8. Guina M, Leinonen T, Härkönen A, Pessa M: High-power disk lasers based on dilute nitride heterostructures. New J Phys 2009, 11: 125019. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/12/125019View Article
                    9. Royall B, Balkan N: Dilute nitride n-i-p-i solar cells. Microelectron J 2009, 40: 396–398. 10.1016/j.mejo.2008.06.011View Article
                    10. Aho A, Tukiainen A, Polojärvi V, Salmi J, Guina M: High current generation in dilute nitride solar cells grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Proc. SPIE 8620, Physics, Simulation, and Photonic Engineering of Photovoltaic Devices II, 86201I 2013. doi:10.1117/12.2002972 doi:10.1117/12.2002972
                    11. Bonnefont B, Messant M, Boutillier O, Gauthier-Lafaye F, Lozes-Dupuy A, Sallet MV, Merghem K, Ferlazzo L, Harmand JC, Ramdane A, Provost JG, Dagens B, Landreau J, Le Gouezigou O, Marie X: Optimization and characterization of InGaAsN/GaAs quantum-well ridge laser diodes for high frequency operation. Opt Quantum Electron 2006, 38: 313–324. 10.1007/s11082-006-0032-7View Article
                    12. Luna E, Hopkinson M, Ulloa JM, Guzman A, Munoz E: Dilute nitride based double-barrier quantum-well infrared photodetector operating in the near infrared. Appl Phys Lett 2003, 83: 3111–3113. 10.1063/1.1618931View Article
                    13. Hashimoto J, Koyama K, Katsuyama T, Iguchi Y, Yamada Y, Takagishi S, Ito MM, Ishida A: 1.3 μm travelling-wave GaInNAs semiconductor optical amplifier. Jpn J Appl Phys 2004, 43: 3419–3423. 10.1143/JJAP.43.3419View Article
                    14. Alexandropoulos D, Adams MJ, Hatzopoulos Z, Syvridis D: Proposed scheme for polarization insensitive GaInNAs-based semiconductor optical amplifiers. IEEE J Quantum Electron 2005, 41: 817–822.View Article
                    15. Laurand N, Calvez S, Dawson MD, Bryce AC, Jouhti T, Kontinnen J, Pessa M: Performance comparison of GaInNAs vertical-cavity semiconductor optical amplifiers. IEEE J Quantum Electron 2005, 41: 642–649.View Article
                    16. Suzuki N, Ohashi M, Nakamura M: A proposed vertical-cavity optical repeater for optical inter-board connections. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 1997, 9: 1149–1151.View Article
                    17. Björlin ES, Geske J, Bowers JE: Optically pre-amplified receiver at 10Gb/s using a vertical-cavity SOA. Electron Lett 2001, 37: 1474–1475. 10.1049/el:20010997View Article
                    18. Bouché N, Corbett B, Kuszelewicz R, Ray R: Vertical-cavity amplifying photonic switch at 1.5 μm. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 1996, 8: 1035–1037.View Article
                    19. Calvez S, Clark AH, Hopkins JM, Merlin P, Sun HD, Dawson MD, Jouhti T, Pessa M: Amplification and laser action in diode-pumped 1.3 μm GaInNAs vertical-cavity structures. In Proceedings of 2002 IEEE/Leos Annual Meeting Conference: 10–14 Nov 2002. Glasgow; Piscataway: IEEE; 2002:165–166.
                    20. Alexandropoulos D, Adams MJ: GaInNAs-based vertical cavity semiconductor optical amplifiers. J Phys: Cond Matt 2004, 16: S3345-S3354. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/31/023
                    21. Calvez S, Clark AH, Hopkins J-M, Macaluso R, Merlin P, Sun HD, Dawson MD: 1.3 μm GaInNAs optically-pumped vertical cavity semiconductor optical amplifier. Electron Lett 2003, 39: 100–102. 10.1049/el:20030119View Article
                    22. Clark AH, Calvez S, Laurand N, Macaluso R, Sun HD, Dawson MD, Jouhti T, Kontinnen J, Pessa M: Long-wavelength monolithic GaInNAs vertical-cavity optical amplifiers. IEEE J Quantum Electron 2004, 40: 878–883.View Article
                    23. Laurand N, Calvez S, Dawson MD, Kelly AE: Index and gain dynamics of optically pumped GaInNAs vertical-cavity semiconductor optical amplifier. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87: 231115–231117. 10.1063/1.2140068View Article
                    24. Laurand N, Calvez S, Dawson MD, Kelly AE: Slow-light in a vertical-cavity semiconductor optical amplifier. Opt Express 2006, 14: 6858–6863. 10.1364/OE.14.006858View Article
                    25. Chaqmaqchee FAI, Balkan N: Gain studies of 1.3-μm dilute nitride HELLISH-VCSOA for optical communications. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 526–529. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-526View Article
                    26. Calvez S, Hopkins J-M, Smith SA, Clark AH, Macaluso R, Sun HD, Dawson MD, Jouhti T, Pessa M, Gundogdu K, Hall KC, Boggess TF: GaInNAs/GaAs Bragg-mirror-based structures for novel 1.3 μm device applications. J Cryst Growth 2004, 268: 457–465. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.04.072View Article
                    27. Mircea A, Caliman A, Iakovlev V, Mereuta A, Suruceanu G, Berseth C-A, Royo P, Syrbu A, Kapon E: Cavity mode—gain peak tradeoff for 1320-nm wafer-fused VCSELs with 3-mW single-mode emission power and 10-Gb/s modulation speed up to 70°C. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 2007, 19: 121–123.View Article


                    © Lisesivdin et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

                    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.