Open Access

Hexagonal core-shell and alloy Au/Ag nanodisks on ZnO nanorods and their optical enhancement effect

  • Junming Zhang1,
  • Boya Lai1,
  • Zuxin Chen1,
  • Sheng Chu1Email author,
  • Guang Chu2 and
  • Rufang Peng3
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:237

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-237

Received: 16 February 2014

Accepted: 17 April 2014

Published: 14 May 2014


Au and Ag hybrid hexagonal nanodisks were synthesized on ZnO nanorods' (0002) surface via a new two-step deposition-annealing method. The structural, compositional, as well as optical investigations were carried out systematically to find out the nanodisks' formation mechanism and optical enhancement effect. It was shown that the core-shell Au/Ag nanodisk can be formed under rapid annealing temperature of 500°C, while Au/Ag alloy nanodisks are formed if higher temperatures (>550°C) are applied. The optical effect from these nanodisks was studied through photoluminescence and absorption spectroscopy. It was found that the carrier-plasmon coupling together and carrier transfer between metal and ZnO contribute to the emission enhancement. Furthermore, the results suggest that the composition of nanodisk on the vicinity of metal/ZnO interface plays an important role in terms of the enhancement factors.


Metal nanoparticle Nanodisk Zinc oxide Plasmonic


The interest in developing superior nanomaterials has seen tremendous progress in terms of nanofabrication, nanopatterning, and nano-self-assembly [13]. These progresses generated a wealth family of novel, engineered structures with desirable shape and electronic and optical properties [46]. These not only give researchers the foundation for basic physics phenomena that are not seen in bulk materials but also provided a wide range of application opportunities. A good example is the plasmonic nanostructures; particularly, Au and Ag nanoparticles are the most studied nanomaterials [79]. The mature solution-based synthesis techniques for Au and Ag nanostructures have enabled size, shape, and inter-particle spacing controllable solutions or arrays. They have demonstrated strong absorption and scattering resonance in a wide range of wavelength, which is now actively applied in functional devices and systems such as surface plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy [10], solar cells [11, 12], as well as lasers [13, 14].

The advantages of nanomaterials are not limited to single component but should be extended to the possibilities to combine different nanocomponents into hybrid/composite structures [15, 16]. Hybrid materials feature merits from two or more components and potentially synergistic properties caused by interactions between them. Interactions can be very strong as both the building blocks and separation between them have nanoscale dimensions [17, 18]. For instance, it is well studied that nanoscale emitters benefit from metal nanoparticle or nanofilm surroundings [13, 19, 20]. In the wide bandgap semiconductor ZnO, reports have shown that by placing Au or Ag nanoparticles on ZnO nanorods or films [21, 22], the ZnO's luminescence capability can be enhanced due to the carrier transfer from surface plasmon states to ZnO. More recently, we have developed a facile method to epitaxially grow Au, Ag, Pt, and Pd hexagonal/triangular nanodisks on ZnO nanorods' (0002) surface [23], in which Au and Ag nanodisks also exhibit very strong photoluminescence (PL) enhancement capability. So, metal/ZnO hybrid nanostructures are good candidate to yield high optical efficiencies in optoelectronic devices, i.e., lasers, LEDs, etc. Hence, further tuning these nanostructure's key parameters, i.e., the composition of Au and Ag inside one nanodisk, may be of substantial interest. On the other hand, since Au and Ag are with very similar lattice parameter and chemical properties, it is therefore possible to form lattice matched Ag/Au multi-layers in nanodisks by an all-solid-state synthesis process, and in this way, some desirable plasmonic structures can be achieved on ZnO nanorods' platform.

In this paper, we focus on the synthesis of Au/Ag core-shell and alloy nanodisks on ZnO nanorods' (0002) surface through a newly developed two-step deposition-annealing method, as well as the systematic characterization of their structural and optical properties. It is found that the annealing temperature determines the structural configuration of the Au/Ag composite nanodisks. Core-shell nanodisks form under the annealing temperature of 500°C, and intermixing Au/Ag alloy nanodisks start to form at the annealing temperature of 550°C. The hybrid structure's PL properties were further studied and analyzed in detail.


The morphology and crystal structures of samples were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Carl Zeiss Leo SUPRA 55 system, Oberkochen, Germany) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) (FEI Tecnai G2 F30, E.A. Fischione Instruments, Inc., Export, PA, USA) with electron dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping capability. PL measurements were carried out to characterize the optical properties of ZnO using a 325-nm He-Cd laser with an excitation power of 5 mW. An Oriel Cornerstone 260 1/4 m monochromator and a photomultiplier (Newport Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA) were used in the measurement. The absorption measurement was done by a Lambda 950 UV/VIS/NIR spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

Sample preparation

In our previous report [21], we introduced a method to epitaxially grow different elemental triangular and hexagonal metal (Au, Ag, Pt, Pd) nanodisks on ZnO nanorods' end surface. The formation mechanism of those well-defined nanodisks is attributed to the matched epitaxial relationship between metal (111) plane and ZnO (0002) plane. In the hybrid nanodisk study here, similarly, high-quality ZnO nanorods with flat (0002) surface were grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method on a c-sapphire substrate and were used as the platform for the growth of metal nanodisks. The formed ZnO nanorods are with length of 1 ~ 3 μm and diameter of 100 ~ 400 nm, and for absorption measurement, aligned ZnO nanorod sample should be used. From the previous experience, the formation of single-element nanodisk is fairly reproducible and controllable; thus, the design of hybrid nanodisks is viable in a two-step strategy: to deposit and anneal Au and Ag separately on top of the ZnO (0002) surface and then anneal them to form different structures. In the experiment, 1-nm (this thickness is given by the quartz crystal of the evaporator, not the real ‘film thickness’) Au was firstly deposited by e-beam evaporation and subsequently annealed at 700°C for 60 s to enable the formation of a first layer of shape well-defined Au nanodisks. In general, as summarized in previous report [23], the growth mechanism of such hexagonal nanodisks can be briefly described: Au undergoes Volmer-Weber (VW) mode growth on ZnO. The formation process is therefore dominated by minimizing the total energy, which is dominated by the interface strain. For relatively small strain <20%, elements such as Au (111) plane will match on sixfold ZnO (0002) plane and form hexagonal nanodisks. In later experiment, this Au nanodisks layer acted as the scaffold for Au/Ag core-shell and intermixing alloy nanodisks.The sample was then put into e-beam evaporation again for 1-nm Ag capping. Since the rapid annealing is very important for the hexagonal metal nanodisks' growth, hence here we also focus on studying the annealing temperatures' effect on Ag/Au hybrid structures. Annealing was then performed on the Ag on Au/ZnO samples under different temperatures (sample A: 500°C, sample B: 550°C, and sample C: 600°C). Figure 1a,b,c shows the SEM images for samples A, B, and C, respectively. It is clearly shown that samples A and B preserve the well-defined hexagonal/triangular shapes of those single elemental nanodisks. It is found that sample C lost a noticeable degree of those defined shapes and exhibits round-shaped corners due to possible severe diffusion of Au and Ag.
Figure 1

SEM images of samples A, B, and C. (a) Sample A: Au/Ag nanodisk annealed at 500°C, (b) sample B: Au/Ag nanodisk annealed at 550°C, and (c) sample C: Au/Ag nanodisk annealed at 600°C. Scale bar = 100 nm.

Two possible cases may happen and should be clarified in the formation of these hybrid nanodisks: (1) Ag resides on top of the surface of Au nanodisks; (2) Ag forms independent hexagonal nanodisks. Since Au and Ag's lattice constants (a) are 4.08 and 4.09 Å, the lattice mismatch of Ag on Au is (aAg − aAu)/aAu = 0.25%. Therefore, Ag residing on Au lattice will have a significantly smaller strain. However, it is still important to clarify the material distribution of Ag. X-ray EDS spectra for sample A was performed and shown in Figure 2a. It clearly resolves the signal from AuM and AgL. Figure 2b,c may provide insight into the elemental distribution of Ag/Au. It can be observed that both Au and Ag signals are observed on top of the same ZnO nanorod. However, whether the Au and Ag signals are from the same locations (nanodisks) is unknown due to limited resolution of EDS. In order to clarify the microstructure and Au/Ag elemental distribution, high-resolution scanning TEM with EDS mapping capability was employed for characterization.
Figure 2

EDS spectrum of sample A and EDS mapping for Au and Ag elements. (a) EDS spectrum of sample A. (b) EDS mapping for Au element: the region of mapping corresponds to (a). Acquisition time 80 s. (c) EDS mapping for Ag element. Acquisition time 80 s.

Results and discussion

Figure 3a shows the scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of sample A, and Figure 3b,d shows the corresponding EDS mapping for elemental signal AuM, AgL, and ZnK, respectively. It could be shown that the resolution of 0.5 nm is enough to locate the elements. Evidently, the concentration of Ag is higher at the outer ‘shell,,’ whereas Au concentrated at the inner regions. This is a clear indication of quasi core-shell structural Au/Ag nanodisk formation. In addition, the lattice spacing of 0.234 nm is determined from TEM, which is close to Ag and Au's (111) inter-plane distance. The (111) twin plane is observed with 72° tilted angle. This twin planes have been widely found in the previous Au nanodisks [24]. Twinning is the typical result of coalescence of multiple nanocrystals that is driven by thermal energy. Furthermore, it is also noticeable that in Figure 3b, Ag element distributes with higher density along the boundary of the twinning crystals. This is reasonable because the diffusion of Ag in Au tends to follow the defect lines in Au crystals [25]. Nevertheless, the contrast between Au and Ag is fairly clear in the EDS mapping, suggesting the quasi core-shell formation. Since Au and Ag have very similar lattice constant, the growth of Ag shell on Au nanodisks has neglectable strain; thus, in this way, the Ag/Au heterostructural nanodisk can reasonably minimize the interface energy. Interestingly, due to the small Ag/Au mismatch, it is observed that no singular Ag nanodisks actually formed on ZnO's (0002) surface, and Ag atoms all lay on Au nanodisks to minimize the interface energy. Figure 4a shows low-magnification TEM image of Ag/Au nanodisks on ZnO. Nine nanodisks were identified and marked with black arrow. In the following Au and Ag elemental mapping (Figure 4b,c), it is observed that both Au and Ag disperse in or on these nine nanodisks, suggesting that no singular Ag nanodisks were formed.
Figure 3

TEM image of sample A and EDS mapping for Au, Ag, and Zn elements. (a) TEM image of one nanodisk in sample A (low temperature annealing). Black arrow and white line indicate the twin boundary. Scale bar = 2 nm. EDS mapping for (b) Au, (c) Ag, and (d) Zn elements.
Figure 4

TEM image of Ag/Au nanodisks and EDS mapping for Au and Ag elements. (a) TEM image of Ag/Au nanodisks annealed at 500°C on a ZnO nanorod. Scale bar = 20 nm. EDS mapping for (b) Au and (c) Ag elements.

It is also known that with sufficient thermal energy, Au and Ag can easily intermix due to similar lattice structure and high inter-diffusion rate. In solution-synthesized nanoparticles, generally under relatively low annealing temperature (<200°C), Au/Ag core-shell nanoparticles start to convert to alloy nanoparticles [26]. In the solution process, annealing always needs hours to complete. As a contrary, the rapid annealing here only takes tens of seconds; thus, the status of Ag atoms will be dynamically determined by the thermal energy. In this case, relatively low temperature may not provide enough thermal energy for intermixing. As a result, with 500°C rapid annealing, sample A still displays a quasi ‘core-shell’ morphology. With longer duration of annealing or higher annealing temperatures, the mixing of Au and Ag will become much more obvious. Figure 5a,b,c,d shows the STEM images and EDS mapping of Au, Ag, and Zn for composite nanodisk sample C. In contrary to sample A, the EDS mapping signal results indicate that the Au and Ag signals are almost totally intermixed. The ratio of the AuM and AgL intensity is approximately 1.2:1. Considering that the Cliff-Lorimer factor (KAB for Au and Ag) of this EDS system is 1.52, this suggests that this alloy nanodisk is Au0.51Ag0.49. Sample B is an intermediate sample, and the STEM characterization yields an elemental distribution in between A and C (not shown here).
Figure 5

TEM image of sample C and EDS mapping for Au, Ag, and Zn elements. (a) TEM image of one nanodisk in sample C (high temperature annealing). Scale bar = 5 nm. EDS mapping for (b) Au, (c) Ag, and (d) Zn elements.

Besides, the material characteristics and the optical properties of metal/semiconductors are also with profound interest. Previous studies suggest that the ability to tune ZnO's PL recombination by Au and Ag nanoparticles depends on the efficiency of carrier and plasmon coupling as well as carrier transfer between metal and ZnO [2731]. Particularly, the authors in [31] shows that the alignment of metal energy bands with ZnO also plays an important role. Here, samples with different annealing conditions were employed to test the optical properties. The samples used in the optical characterization are aligned nanorods with relative short length to highlight metal/ZnO interface effect (approximately 1 μm), as shown in Figure 6a. In order to exclude the formation of metal nanoparticles on the side walls of ZnO nanorods, poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was spun on the sample to fill the inter-nanorod space (Figure 6a). The top surface was then rapidly cleaned by acetone and deposited with metal nanodisks. The PMMA was subsequently removed by hot acetone for the annealing process. The TEM image in Figure 6b suggests that the metal nanodots are greatly suppressed on the side walls of ZnO nanorods. This fact will enable the analysis of hexagonal nanodisks on ZnO's top surface alone rather than more randomly distributed nanodots from the e-beam evaporation process. After this treatment, the PL spectra of these Au/Ag nanodisks on ZnO nanorods are shown in Figure 7a. All samples demonstrate strong UV emissions with neglectable deep-level emissions. Evidently, 600°C annealed sample showed the strongest PL intensity, and with lower annealing temperature, PL intensity decreases evidently. The emission enhancement rate is comparable to reported metal nanostructure/ZnO systems [2729]. The increase of ZnO near band edge emission is attributed to two possible reasons. The first reason is Purcell enhancement through carrier-plasmon coupling effect [30]. In this case, the surface plasmons of the nanodisks can couple with the ZnO photo-excited carriers (forming excitons) near the surface of the nanorods. Since the lifetime of surface plasmons is much shorter than that of electrons and holes, the carriers tend to couple with the surface plasmons of the nanodisks and then be extracted as light. As a result, the possibility of the carriers being captured by non-radiative centers will be low. Another possible reason here might be carrier transfer effect. This cannot be ruled out because there is no dielectric spacing layer between the metal and ZnO [28]. In this case, the flow of electrons from the ZnO defect level into the Au Fermi level is allowed, which increases the electron density within the nanodisk. Then, hot electrons are created in high energy states which can transfer back to the conduction band of ZnO nanorods [31]. In addition, the PL peaks redshift with higher annealing temperature, which is attributed to ZnO's rapid annealing effect (JM Zhang and S Chu, unpublished work). The authors in [32, 33] investigated the Au/Ag alloy nanoparticles' plasmonic resonant characteristics and suggest that the resonant wavelength blueshifts with the increase of Ag composition, which is a result of different inter-band transitions as well as the dielectric functions of the two metals. As a result, in a nanodisk with higher Ag content, the active (resonant) wavelength will lie closer to the emission wavelength of ZnO (approximately 380 nm) and also closer to the laser excitation wavelength (325 nm). In this case, the absorption of excitation photon (325-nm laser) together with carrier/plasmon coupling is going to be stronger. Experimentally, absorption measurements were performed to examine the hybrid nanodisks' optical characteristics. The Au/Ag nanodisks were prepared on the ZnO nanorod sample and annealed in different pieces. The transmission spectra of samples annealed at 500°C, 550°C, and 600°C are shown in Figure 7b. It is observed that with higher annealing temperature, the absorption has a trend of blueshift, which is a result from plasmonic absorption band variation due to metal nanodisks. With higher annealing temperature, intermixing of Au and Ag raised higher Ag contents in the bulk of the nanodisk contacting the ZnO surface. Therefore, it caused the resonant wavelength of the alloy nanodisk blueshifts. Moreover, the work function of Au/Ag composite is reported to monotonically decrease with the increase of the Ag composition [34]. Based on a previous study [23], the work function will play a role on Ag/ZnO nanorods' PL emission: with lower work function, the band alignments favor carriers to overcome the metal/ZnO interface barrier. This factor will further assist the PL emission enhancement in annealed Au/Ag nanodisk/ZnO nanorod system.
Figure 6

Aligned ZnO nanorods and TEM image of Ag/Au nanodisks. (a) Aligned ZnO nanorods with PMMA-filled inter-space. Scale bar = 100 nm. (b) TEM image of Ag/Au nanodisks on top of ZnO nanorods. Scale bar = 100 nm.
Figure 7

PL and absorption spectra of samples. (a) PL spectra under 325-nm laser excitation for samples annealed at 500°C, 550°C, and 600°C. (b) Absorption spectra for these samples.


In conclusion, Au and Ag hybrid nanodisk structures were formed on the top end surface of ZnO nanorods. By varying the rapid annealing temperatures, the composite nanodisks' structure changed drastically. The core-shell and alloy Au/Ag nanodisks were achieved and characterized, while their formation mechanisms were discussed. The composite nanodisks' effect on tuning the ZnO nanorods' PL properties was further carried out. It has been found that with higher annealing temperature the PL intensity from ZnO becomes stronger, which is attributed to the shift of resonant wavelength due to composition change in the plasmonic nanodisks.



chemical vapor deposition


electron dispersive spectroscopy




poly (methyl methacrylate)


scanning electron microscope


scanning transmission electron microscopy


transmission electron microscope





The authors thank the financial support from the National Science Foundation of China under the contract number 11204097.

Authors’ Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University
School of Metallurgy Engineering, Central South University
School of Material Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology


  1. Mark D, Haeberle S, Roth G, Stetten FV, Zengerle R: Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications. Chem Soc Re 2010, 39: 1153–1182. 10.1039/b820557bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Barth JV, Costantini G, Kern K: Engineering atomic and molecular nanostructures at surfaces. Nature 2005, 437: 671–679. 10.1038/nature04166View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Alivisatos AP: Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science 1996, 271: 933–937. 10.1126/science.271.5251.933View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yao J, Yan H, Lieber CM: A nanoscale combing technique for the large-scale assembly of highly aligned nanowires. Nature Nanotechnol 2013, 8: 329–335. 10.1038/nnano.2013.55View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Reed MA, Randall JN, Aggarwal RJ, Matyi RJ, Moore TM, Wetsel AE: Observation of discrete electronic states in a zero-dimensional semiconductor nanostructure. Phys Rev Lett 1988, 60: 535–537. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.535View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kamat PV: Meeting the clean energy demand: nanostructure architectures for solar energy conversion. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111: 2834–2860. 10.1021/jp066952uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Tao AR, Habas S, Yang PD: Shape control of colloidal metal nanocrystals. Small 2008, 4: 310–325. 10.1002/smll.200701295View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jain PK, Huang XH, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA: Noble metals on the nanoscale: optical and photothermal properties and some applications in imaging, sensing, biology, and medicine. Accnt Chem Res 2008, 41: 1578–1586. 10.1021/ar7002804View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pedersen DB, Wang SL, Duncan EJS, Liang SH: Adsorbate-induced diffusion of Ag and Au atoms out of the cores of Ag@ Au, Au@ Ag, and Ag@ AgI core-shell nanoparticles. J Chem Phys C 2007, 111: 13665–13672. 10.1021/jp073425hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Anker JN, Hall WP, Lyandres O, Shah NC, Zha J, Van Duyne RP: Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nature Mater 2008, 7: 442–453. 10.1038/nmat2162View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferry VE, Verschuuren MA, Li HBT, Verhagen E, Walters RJ, Schropp REI, Atwater HA, Polman A: Light trapping in ultrathin plasmonic solar cells. Opt Express 2010, 18: A237-A245. 10.1364/OE.18.00A237View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wu J, Mangham SC, Reddy VR, Manasreh MO, Weaver BD: Surface plasmon enhanced intermediate band based quantum dots solar cell. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cell 2012, 102: 44–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Oulton RF, Sorger VJ, Zentgraf T, Ma RM, Gladden C, Dai L, Bartal G, Zhang X: Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale. Nature 2009, 461: 629–632. 10.1038/nature08364View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu J, Lee SY, Reddy VR, Manasreh MO, Weaver BD, Yakes MK, Furrow CS, Kunets VP, Benamara M, Salamo GJ: Photoluminescence plasmonic enhancement in InAs quantum dots coupled to gold nanoparticles. Mater Lett 2011, 65: 23–24.Google Scholar
  15. Wang DH, Choi DW, Li J, Yang ZG, Nie ZM, Kou R, Hu DH, Wang CM, Saraf LV, Zhang JG, Aksay IA, Liu J: Self-assembled TiO2-graphene hybrid nanostructures for enhanced Li-ion. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 907–914. 10.1021/nn900150yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pyun J: Nanocomposite materials from functional polymers and magnetic colloids. Polymer Rev 2007, 47: 231–263. 10.1080/15583720701271294View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Peng H, Sun X, Cai F, Chen X, Zhu Y, Liao G, Chen D, Li Q, Lu Y, Zhu Y, Jia Q: Electrochromatic carbon nanotube/polydiacetylene nanocomposite fibres. Nat Nanotechnol 2009, 4: 738–741. 10.1038/nnano.2009.264View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Subramanian V, Wolf E, Kamat PV: Semiconductor–metal composite nanostructures. To what extent do metal nanoparticles improve the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 films? Phys Chem B 2001, 105: 11439–11446. 10.1021/jp011118kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hill MT, Marell M, Leong ESP, Smalbrugge B, Zhu YC, Sun MH, Veldhoven PJ, Geluk EJ, Karouta F, Oei YS, Notzel R, Ning CZ, Smit MK: Lasing in metal-insulator-metal sub-wavelength plasmonic waveguides. Opt Express 2009, 17: 11107–11112. 10.1364/OE.17.011107View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Achermann M: Exciton − plasmon interactions in metal − semiconductor nanostructures. J Phys Chem Lett 2010, 1: 2837–2843. 10.1021/jz101102eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Xiao XH, Ren F, Zhou XD, Peng TC, Wu W, Peng XN, Yu XF, Jiang CZ: Surface plasmon-enhanced light emission using silver nanoparticles embedded in ZnO. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 071909. 10.1063/1.3480417View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen T, Xing GZ, Zhang Z, Chen HY, Wu T: Tailoring the photoluminescence of ZnO nanowires using Au nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2008, 19: 435711. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/43/435711View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chu S, Ren J, Yan D, Huang J, Liu J: Noble metal nanodisks epitaxially formed on ZnO nanorods and their effect on photoluminescence. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 101: 043122. 10.1063/1.4739516View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanchez-Iglesias A, Pastoriza-Santos I, Perez-Juste J, Rodriguez-Gonzalez B, Gacia FJ, Liz-Marzan LM: Synthesis and optical properties of gold nanodecahedra with size control. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 2529–2534. 10.1002/adma.200600475View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wandelt K, Niemantsverdriet JW, Dolle P, Markert K: Thermal stability of atomic Ag/Au and Au/Ag interfaces on a Ru (001) substrate. Surf Sci 1989, 213: 612–629. 10.1016/0039-6028(89)90317-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Shore MS, Wang J, Johnston-Peck AC, Oldenburg AL, Tracy JB: Synthesis of Au (core)/Ag (shell) nanoparticles and their conversion to AuAg alloy nanoparticles. Small 2011, 7: 230–234. 10.1002/smll.201001138View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Shen H, Shan C, Qiao Q, Liu J, Li B, Shen DZ: Stable surface plasmon enhanced ZnO homojunction light-emitting devices. J Mater Chem C 2013, 1: 234–237. 10.1039/c2tc00154cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu M, Chen R, Adamo G, Macdonald KF, Sie EJ, Sum TC, Zheludev NI, Sun H, Fan HJ: Tuning the influence of metal nanoparticles on ZnO photoluminescence by atomic-layer-deposited dielectric spacer. Nanoplasmonics 2013, 2: 153–160.Google Scholar
  29. Liu W, Xu HY, Wang CL, Zhang LX, Zhang C, Sun SY, Ma JG, Zhang XT, Wang JN, Liu YC: Selective enhancement of ZnO ultraviolet electroluminescence and improved spatial uniformity of output-light intensity in Ag-nanoparticles-decorated ZnO nanorod array heterojunction light-emitting diodes. Nanoscale 2013, 5: 8634–8639. 10.1039/c3nr02844eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Cheng CW, Sie EJ, Liu B, Huan CHA, Sum TC, Sun HD, Fan HJ: Surface plasmon enhanced band edge luminescence of ZnO nanorods by capping Au nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 071107. 10.1063/1.3323091View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Fang YJ, Sha J, Wang ZL, Wan YT, Xia WW, Wang YW: Behind the change of the photoluminescence property of metal-coated ZnO nanowire arrays. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 033103. 10.1063/1.3543902View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuladeep R, Jyothi L, Shadak Alee K, Deepak KLN, Narayana Rao D: Laser-assisted synthesis of Au-Ag alloy nanoparticles with tunable surface plasmon resonance frequency. Opt Mater Express 2012, 2: 161–172. 10.1364/OME.2.000161View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Peng Z, Spliethoff B, Tesche B, Walther T, Kleinermanns K: Laser-assisted synthesis of Au-Ag alloy nanoparticles in solution. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110: 2549–2554. 10.1021/jp056677wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Davidson ER, Fain SC: Alloy work functions: Extended Hückel calculations for Ag–Au and Cu–Au clusters. J Vac Sci Technol 1976, 13(2):209–213.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Zhang et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.