We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly. Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.

Structural damage of chicken red blood cells exposed to platinum nanoparticles and cisplatin

  • Marta Kutwin1,
  • Ewa Sawosz1,
  • Sławomir Jaworski1,
  • Natalia Kurantowicz1,
  • Barbara Strojny1 and
  • André Chwalibog2Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:257

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-257

Received: 24 March 2014

Accepted: 10 May 2014

Published: 23 May 2014


Side effects and resistance of cancer cells to cisplatin are major drawbacks to its application, and recently, the possibility of replacing cisplatin with nanocompounds has been considered. Most chemotherapeutic agents are administered intravenously, and comparisons between the interactions of platinum nanoparticles (NP-Pt) and cisplatin with blood compartments are important for future applications. This study investigated structural damage, cell membrane deformation and haemolysis of chicken embryo red blood cells (RBC) after treatment with cisplatin and NP-Pt. Cisplatin (4 μg/ml) and NP-Pt (2,6 μg/ml), when incubated with chicken embryo RBC, were detrimental to cell structure and induced haemolysis. The level of haemolytic injury was increased after cisplatin and NP-Pt treatments compared to the control group. Treatment with cisplatin caused structural damage to cell membranes and the appearance of keratocytes, while NP-Pt caused cell membrane deformations (discoid shape of cells was lost) and the formation of knizocytes and echinocytes. This work demonstrated that NP-Pt have potential applications in anticancer therapy, but potential toxic side effects must be explored in future preclinical research.


Platinum nanoparticles Cisplatin Haemolysis Red blood cells Cancer therapy


Cisplatin (cis-diamineplatinum(II) dichloride) is a chemotherapeutic drug widely used against various solid tumours and testicular cancer, which has dose-dependent side effects like nephrotoxicity, emetogenesis, ototoxicity, neurotoxicity and haemolysis [13]. Repeated intravenous administration of platinum salts may induce haemolytic anaemia by interfering with iron metabolism, decreasing the level of red blood cell precursors and creating an immune-complex between red blood cells (RBC) and cisplatin [4, 5]. Moreover, side effects, including haemolytic properties, and resistance of cancer cells to cisplatin are major drawbacks to its application in cancer therapy, and recently, the possibility of replacing platinum salts with nanocompounds has been considered [68]. Due to their size (<25 nm), large surface to mass ratio, quantum properties, catalytic activity and high reactivity, platinum nanoparticles (NP-Pt) have unique physicochemical properties and can exert specific effects on a living organism. The bioavailability of NP-Pt colloids depends on particle size, and small NP-Pt (<4 nm) were more barcterio-toxic [9], induced the human cell genotoxic stress (5 to 8 nm) [10] and activated the cell death by apoptosis [11] compared to the bigger nanoparticles (>100 nm) [12, 13]. NP-Pt can cause cell cycle arrest and activate apoptosis through the release of Pt2+ ions during H2O2 generation due to the low pH in endosomes [14], and DNA double-strand breaks are caused by Pt2+ ions when NP-Pt are incubated with human colon carcinoma cells (HT29) [15]. However, the consequences of in vivo NP-Pt administration are not well documented and must be elucidated in future research [9].

Haemolytic properties and interactions with RBC are main parameters for the biocompatibility of nanoparticles [5, 16]. The bloodstream is the main translocation path for glucose, oxygen and carbon dioxide, as well as nanoparticles. Incubation of silver (Ag), gold (Au) and Pt nanoparticles with human RBC demonstrated that Au and Pt nanoparticles are non-haemolytic but cause haemagglutination, while Ag nanoparticles are haemolytic [14]. In vitro haemocompatibility studies indicated that biosynthesised Pt nanoparticles had negligible haemolytic effects [17], while Ashranani et al. reported that Pt and Au nanoparticles (compared to Ag) were more haemocompatible and did not show the agglutination of erythrocyte and also no precipitation properties [14]. On the other hand, Ag nanoparticles did not cause significant changes in micronucleated polychromic erythrocytes, and no dose-dependent differences in haemolysis were observed [3]. Recent studies have demonstrated the haemolytic properties of other nanoparticles like polystyrene [18], PLGA [4], TiO2[19] and mesoporous silica [20].

This study evaluated the hypothesis that NP-Pt may affect the morphology of chicken embryo RBC, causing haemolysis and structural damage comparable to Pt salt. The objective of this preliminary work was to compare the biocompatibility of NP-Pt and cisplatin with chicken embryo RBC.



NP-Pt hydrocolloid was obtained from Nano-koloid (Warsaw, Poland), which was produced by a patented electric non-explosive method (Polish patent 380649) from high-purity metal (99.9999%) and high-purity demineralized water, and diluted to 2.6 μg/ml in phosphate buffered saline (PBS: pH 7.2; P4417, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).The morphology of NP-Pt was inspected using a JEOL JEM-1220 transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 80 KeV equipped with a Morada 11 megapixel camera (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) (Figure 1). Triplicate samples of NP-Pt were prepared for TEM by placing droplets of the hydrocolloid onto Formvar-coated copper grids (Agar Scientific Ltd., Stansted, UK) and air drying before TEM imaging (Figure 1). The zeta potential of the NP-Pt hydrocolloid was measured by the electrophoretic light-scattering method using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS90 (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). Each sample (20 replicates) of NP-Pt was measured after 120 s of stabilization at 25°C.
Figure 1

TEM imagines of platinum nanoparticles. Scale bar, 100 nm.

Cisplatin (cis-diamineplatinum(II) dichloride) was obtain from Sigma (479306; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and diluted to 4 μg/ml in PBS immediately before use. The final concentration of cisplatin hydrocolloid was 4 μg/ml of cisplatin, because of the potential and the best efficiency (67% of mice tumour free after 4 μg/ml cisplatin treatment) for intratumoural injection [1]. The concentration of NP-Pt (2.6 μg/ml) was equal to the atomic mass of Pt atoms in cisplatin.

Embryo model

Fertilized eggs (n = 20; 56 ± 2.2 g) from Ross Line hens were obtained from a commercial hatchery, stored at 12°C for 4 days and incubated under standard conditions for an additional 19 days (temperature 37.5°C, 60% humidity, turning once per hour). On day 20, the embryos were sacrificed by decapitation and blood samples (one sample from each embryo) collected from the jugular vein. Blood samples were divided into four groups: control untreated (0% haemolysis), positive control treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide (100% haemolysis), 4 μg/ml cisplatin [1] and 2.6 μg/ml NP-Pt hydrocolloid diluted in PBS. The samples were placed in Vacutainer tubes (BD Inc., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), gently mixed on a rotary shaker and incubated for 3 h at 37°C. The incubation time was based on the research publications [14, 21] and an adjustment of the standard ASTM F-756-00 [22].

All measurements were performed in three repetitions (each experimental group in triplicate).

Blood cell morphology

Light microscopy

Peripheral blood smears were made using 5 μl of blood, air-dried and stained by May-Grünwald-Giemsa. Peripheral blood smears were examined at × 1,000 magnification (Leica DM750, Leica Microsystems, Nussloch, Germany).

Scanning electron microscopy

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of RBC was performed by means of an FEI Quanta 200 electron microscope (FEI Co., Hillsboro, OR, USA). The blood samples were rinsed in PBS (0.01 M, pH 7.2; P4417, Sigma) then fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (G5882, Sigma) for 1 h, washed twice in 0.1 M PBS (0,01 M, pH 7.2; P4417, Sigma) and placed on aluminium SEM stubs. The SEM stubs were kept in a moist atmosphere for 1 h, washed in PBS (0.01 M, pH 7.2; P4417, Sigma), post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (75632, Sigma) for 1 h, rinsed in distilled water and dehydrated in graded ethanols. After critical point drying with liquid CO2 in a vacuum apparatus (Polaron CPD 7501, Quorum Technologies, Newhaven, East Sussex, UK) and coating with gold-palladium (JEE-4C, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), the samples were inspected by SEM at 1 KeV (FEI Quanta 200).

Haemolytic assay

The haemolysis assay was performed with chicken whole blood. After incubation, the tubes containing blood samples from the groups - control untreated (0% haemolysis), positive control treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide (100% haemolysis), 4 μg/ml cisplatin [1] and 2.6 μg/ml NP-Pt hydrocolloid - were centrifuged at 1,200 rpm (Sorvall ST 16, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) for 10 min to collect the plasma. The supernatant was analysed for the presence of the haemoglobin at 540 nm (Infinite M200, Tecan, Durham, NC, USA) and percent haemolysis calculated according to Shiny et al. [17].

Statistical analysis

The data was evaluated by mono-factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). The differences between groups were tested by the multiple-range Tukey test using Statgraphic Centurion ver. XV (Statpoint Technologies, Warrenton, VO, USA). Differences with P < 0.05 were considered significant.



TEM observation of NP-Pt did show that NP-Pt had regular spherical shape ranging from 2 to 19 nm, and also the aggregation of nanoparticles was not observed (Figure 1). The mean zeta potential of the NP-Pt was −9.6 mV.

Evaluation of morphological changes by microscopy

Evaluation of RBC by light microscopy demonstrated that NP-Pt and cisplatin had harmful effects on morphology. The cell membranes were damaged, the shape of cells was deformed and cells lost their biconcavity. Observation also showed an increasing level of swollen cells as a result of membrane damage after osmotic pressure on red blood cells (Figure 2). Exposure of RBC to NP-Pt and cisplatin caused haemagglutination. Scanning electron microscopy revealed ruffled cells, membrane deformations and loss of the discoid shape of RBC treated with NP-Pt. After cisplatin treatment, keratocytes were seen (Figure 3B), indicating that cisplatin had haemolytic properties. After NP-Pt treatment (Figure 3C), there were structural changes in the RBC, and knizocytes were also seen. SEM analysis of RBC treated with NP-Pt also showed early echinocytes with blebs and protuberances on their surfaces.
Figure 2

RBC morphology by light microscopy. (A) Control (without treatment), (B) cisplatin and (C) NP-Pt. Black arrow, deformation of erythrocytes; white arrow, swollen RBC; g, ghost cells. Scale bar, 20 μm.

Figure 3

Visualization of RBC morphology by scanning electron microscopy. (A) Control (without treatment), (B) cisplatin and (C) NP-Pt. Asterisk, keratocyte; k, knizocyte; e, echinocyte. Scale bar, 10 μm.


NP-Pt and cisplatin were haemolytic compared to the control group (Figure 4), and the percent haemolysis was higher for NP-Pt (23%) than for cisplatin (14%). The lack of haemolysis in the control group and almost 100% haemolysis in the positive control group (treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide) confirmed the accuracy of the assay.
Figure 4

Haemolysis of RBC. Bars with different superscripts denote a statistically significant difference between the control group (untreated) and groups treated with the following: 3% hydrogen peroxide (positive control), cisplatin (4 μg/ml) or NP-Pt (2.6 μg/ml). Error bars are standard error of the mean. The bars with different letters indicate significant differences, P < 0.05.


Chicken embryo RBC were exposed to NP-Pt and the antineoplastic drug cisplatin, which allowed haemocompatibility to be evaluated in a short time, as well as serving as a fast, precise model for evaluating toxicity [11, 23, 24]. It has been demonstrated that NP-Pt had harmful effects on in vivo mice model, causing kidney injury after intravenous administration [25] and inflammatory responses after intratracheal instillation [26]. Furthermore, NP-Pt had harmful effect on in ovo model, causing mitochondria degradation at chicken embryo brain tissue ultrastructure, activation of apoptosis and reduced proliferation rate of the brain cells [11]. In the present research, NP-Pt at 2.6 μg/ml incubated with whole chicken blood affected RBC morphology and haemocompatibility status. Comparing the effects of NP-Pt and cisplatin on RBC structures, there were substantial differences between NP-Pt and cisplatin. The RBC treated with NP-Pt lost their biconcavity and showed corrugations and damage to cell membranes. The analysis of peripheral blood smears from the NP-Pt group revealed the presence of ghost cells, which are the result of cell lysis and release of haemoglobin from RBC [27]. On the other hand, other studies did not show any harmful effect on human RBC structure [21].

The haemolytic properties of Pt drugs during chemotherapy are also responsible for higher risks of blood diseases like anaemia [28]. Comparing the results of this study with previous reports on the haemocompatibility of cisplatin confirmed the haemolytic activity of Pt-based drugs as one of the main side effects causing haemolytic anaemia and also bone marrow diseases and haemolysis [2, 29]. The present results demonstrated that both cisplatin and NP-Pt induced haemolysis compared to the control group. Evaluation of haemocompatibility of nanoparticles should be considered as one of the factors of assessing systemic toxicity. Haemolytic properties of the nanoparticles can be determined by spectrophotometric measurement (540 nm) and based on adjustments of the ASTM F-756-00 standard [22]. Human RBC have different morphology than chicken RBC, with the primary difference being that chicken RBC have a nucleus containing genetic material. The mechanism of action for platinum-containing anticancer drug utilizes the presence of DNA to induce cancer cell death by apoptosis [30, 31]. Regarding the antineoplastic properties of ciplatin, it is important to emphasize that the intravenous administration of cisplatin has severe side effect on blood compartments. The present results confirmed that cisplatin and NP-Pt not only induced haemolysis but also caused the structural damage of RBC. Haemolytic as well as toxic properties of nanoparticles can be reduced by increasing the particle size [12] or by excluding intravenous administration.

Haemocompatibility studies of Pt, Au and Ag nanoparticles demonstrated that only Ag has harmful effects on the structure of human RBC and significantly affected haemolytic status [14]. On the other hand, NP-Pt were described as haemocompatible materials [21]. Furthermore, interactions between NP-Pt and human RBC indicate that NP-Pt have minor effects on cell membrane structure but still cause haemolysis [17]. The present results revealed that cisplatin treatment led to formation of keratocytes, indicating that cisplatin was haemolytic, which may be due to mechanical fragility or oxidant injury to RBC [32]. The results also showed that NP-Pt treatment caused the damage of RBC and also appearance of knizocytes. Knizocytes are RBC with multiple concavities due to indentations of the cell membrane, observed in newborn mammals as a young type of RBC with cell membrane deformations, and also their appearance indicates an impaired microcirculation or impaired oxygen-carrying capacity [33] SEM analysis revealed that after NP-Pt treatment, early echinocytes were observed which may indicate harmful effects to RBC and a side effect often associated with haemolytic anaemia [32, 33].

The present results indicated that the percent haemolysis after NP-Pt treatment was higher compared to cisplatin treatment. These finding may indicate that NP-Pt were toxic to RBC by direct interactions with 2.4 pg of genetic material in chicken RBC [34]. Furthermore, chicken nuclear DNA has a 42% to 43% guanine and cytosine base-pair content [35] which is acted upon by cisplatin, where guanine bases (especially the N7 sites) are preferred sites for Pt binding to DNA [36]. Damage of RBC under the influence of NP-Pt probably was related to the ability to arrest the cell cycle and also the cytotoxicity of NP-Pt [6, 10, 37]. These mechanisms may be responsible for the pathomorphological changes in chicken RBC and also for a high occurrence of haemolysis.


NP-Pt and cisplatin incubated with chicken embryo RBC caused damage to the structure of RBC and induced haemolysis. Treatment with cisplatin caused structural damage to cell membranes and the appearance of keratocytes, while NP-Pt caused cell membrane deformation, loss of the discoid shape and the formation of knizocytes and echinocytes. These preliminary results indicated that NP-Pt could be utilized for cancer therapy instead of cisplatin, but potential side effects must be evaluated in future research.

Authors' information

MK, SJ, NK and BS are PhD students at the Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS). ES is a PhD, DSc, professor and head of department at WULS. AC is a DSc, professor and head of division at the University of Copenhagen (UC).



analysis of variance




ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid


nanoparticles of platinum


phosphate buffered saline


Red blood cells


scanning electron microscope


transmission electron microscope.



This work was supported by grant NCN 2013/09/N/NZ9/01895. This report is part of Marta Kutwin's PhD thesis.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Biotechnology and Biochemistry of Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Science, Warsaw University of Life Science
Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen


  1. Cemazar M, Milacic R, Miklavcic D, Dolzan V, Sersa G: Intratumoral cisplatin administration in electrochemotherapy: antitumor effectiveness, sequence dependence and platinum content. Anticancer Drugs 1998, 9: 525–530.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Getaz EP, Beckley S, Fitzpatrick J, Dozier A: Cisplatin-induced hemolysis. N Engl J Med 1980, 302: 334–335.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kim YS, Kim JS, Cho HS, Rha DS, Kim JM, Park JD, Choi BS, Lim R, Chang HK, Chung YH, Kwon IH, Jeong J, Han BS, Yu IJ: Twenty-eight-day oral toxicity, genotoxicity, and gender-related tissue distribution of silver nanoparticles in Sprague–Dawley rats. Inhal Toxicol 2008, 20(6):575–583.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim D, El-Shall H, Dennis D, Morey T: Interaction of PLGA nanoparticles with human blood constituents. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2005, 40: 83–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mocan T: Hemolysis as expression of nanoparticles-induced cytotoxicity in red blood cells. BMBN 2013, 1: 7–12.Google Scholar
  6. Mironava T, Simon M, Rafailovich MH, Rigas B: Platinum folate nanoparticles toxicity: cancer vs normal cells. Toxicol In Vitro 2013, 27: 882–889.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mohammadi H, Abedi A, Akbarzadeh A, Mokhtari MJ, Shahmabadi HE, Mehrabi MR, Javadian S, Chiani M: Evaluation of synthesized platinum nanoparticles on the MCF-7 and HepG-2 cancer cell lines. International Nano Letters 2013, 3: 28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Palmisano J, Agraharkar M, Kaplan AA: Successful treatment of cisplatin-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome with therapeutic plasma exchange. Am J Kidney Dis 1998, 32: 314–317.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gopal J, Hasan N, Manikandan M, Wu HF: Bacterial toxicity/compatibility of platinum nanospheres, nanocuboids and nanoflowers. Sci Rep 2013, 3: 1260.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Asharani PV, Xinyi N, Hande MP, Valiyaveettil S: DNA damage and p53-mediated growth arrest in human cells treated with platinum nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2010, 5: 51–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Prasek M, Sawosz E, Jaworski S, Grodzik M, Ostaszewska T, Kamaszewski M, Wierzbicki M, Chwalibog A: Influence of nanoparticles of platinum on chicken embryo development and brain morphology. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 251.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Artelt S, Creutzenberg O, Kock H, Levsen K, Nachtigall D, Heinrich U, Rühle T, Schlögl R: Bioavailability of fine dispersed platinum as emitted from automotive catalytic converters: a model study. Sci Total Environ 1999, 228: 219–242.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Xia XR, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Riviere JE: An index for characterization of nanomaterials in biological systems. Nat Nanotechnol 2010, 5: 671–675.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Asharani PV, Sethu S, Vadukumpully S, Zhong S, Lim CT, Hande MP, Valiyaveettil S: Investigations on the structural damage in human erythrocytes exposed to silver, gold, and platinum nanoparticles. Adv Funct Mater 2010, 20: 1233–1242.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gehrke H, Pelka J, Hartinger CG, Blank H, Bleimund F, Schneider R, Gerthsen D, Bräse S, Crone M, Türk M, Marko D: Platinum nanoparticles and their cellular uptake and DNA platination at non-cytotoxic concentrations. Arch Toxicol 2011, 85: 799–812.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Dobrovolskaia MA, Clogston JD, Neun BW, Hall JB, Patri AK, McNeil SE: Method for analysis of nanoparticle hemolytic properties in vitro. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 2180–2187.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Shiny PJ, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N: Haemocompatibility assessment of synthesised platinum nanoparticles and its implication in biology. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2014, 37: 9911–9997.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Barshtein G, Arbell D, Yedgar S: Hemolytic effect of polymeric nanoparticles: role of albumin. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 2011, 10: 259–261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghosh M, Chakraborty A, Mukherjee A: Cytotoxic, genotoxic and the hemolytic effect of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles on human erythrocyte and lymphocyte cell in vitro. J Appl Toxicol 2013, 33: 1097–1110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yildirim A, Ozgur E, Bayindir M: Impact of mesoporous silica nanoparticle surface functionality on hemolytic activity, thrombogenicity and non-specific protein adsorption. J Mater Chem B 2013, 1(14):1909–1920.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark A, Zhu A, Sun K, Petty HR: Cerium oxide and platinum nanoparticles protect cells from oxidant-mediated apoptosis. J Nanopart Res 2011, 13(10):5547–5555.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Standard practice for assessment of hemolytic properties of materials [http://www.astm.org] []
  23. Ribatti D: Chicken chorioallantoic membrane angiogenesis model. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 843: 47–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rashidi H, Sottile V: The chick embryo: hatching a model for contemporary biomedical research. Bioessays 2009, 31: 459–465.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Yamagishi Y, Watari A, Hayata Y, Li X, Kondoh M, Yoshioka Y, Tsutsumi Y, Yagi K: Acute and chronic nephrotoxicity of platinum nanoparticles in mice. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 395.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Park EJ, Kim H, Kim Y, Park K: Intratracheal instillation of platinum nanoparticles may induce inflammatory responses in mice. Arch Pharm Res 2010, 33: 727–735.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Dodge JT, Mitchell C, Hanahan DJ: The preparation and chemical characteristics of hemoglobin-free ghosts of human erythrocytes. Arch Biochem Biophys 1963, 100(1):119–130.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Rajeswaran A, Trojan A, Burnand B, Giannelli M: Efficacy and side effects of cisplatin- and carboplatin-based doublet chemotherapeutic regimens versus non-platinum-based doublet chemotherapeutic regimens as first line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Lung Cancer 2008, 59: 1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Maloisel F, Kurtz JE, Andres E, Gorodetsky C, Dufour P, Oberling F: Platin salts-induced hemolytic anemia: cisplatin- and the first case of carboplatin-induced hemolysis. Anticancer Drugs 1995, 6: 324–326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. McWhinney SR, Goldberg RM, McLeod HL: Platinum neurotoxicity pharmacogenetics. Mol Cancer Ther 2009, 8: 10–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Mekid H, Tounekti O, Spatz A, Cemazar M, Kebir F, Mir L: In vivo evolution of tumour cells after the generation of double-strand DNA breaks. Br J Cancer 2003, 88: 1763–1771.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Weiss DJ, Kristensen A, Papenfuss N: Quantitative evaluation of irregularly spiculated red blood cells in the dog. Vet Clin Pathol 1993, 22: 117–121.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Swanepoel AC, Pretorius E: Scanning electron microscopy analysis of erythrocytes in thromboembolic ischemic stroke. Int J Lab Hematol 2012, 34: 185–191.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes MM: Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury. I. Smooth muscle growth in absence of endothelium. Lab Invest 1983, 49: 327–333.Google Scholar
  35. Marmur J, Doty P: Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J Mol Biol 1962, 5: 109–118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Jung Y, Lippard SJ: Direct cellular responses to platinum-induced DNA damage. Chem Rev 2007, 107: 1387–1407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Porcel E, Liehn S, Remita H, Usami N, Kobayashi K, Furusawa Y, Le Sech C, Lacombe S: Platinum nanoparticles: a promising material for future cancer therapy? Nanotechnology 2010, 21: 085103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Kutwin et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.