Open Access

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as capping ligands for highly water-dispersible iron oxide particles

Contributed equally
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:27

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-27

Received: 18 December 2013

Accepted: 8 January 2014

Published: 14 January 2014


Monodispersed magnetite (Fe3O4) particles were synthesized using a high-temperature hydrolysis reaction with the assistance of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as capping ligands. These particles were composed of small primary nanocrystals and their sizes could be tuned from about 400 to about 800 nm by simply changing the EDTA or precursor concentration. Surface-tethered EDTA made the particles highly water-dispersible. The as-prepared magnetite particles also showed superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature, and their magnetic properties were size dependent. In addition, the particles had a strong response to external magnetic field due to their high magnetization saturation values. These properties were very important for some potential biomedical applications, such as magnetic separation and magnetic-targeted substrate delivery.


Magnetite Magnetic properties Nanocrystalline materials


Over the past decade, magnetic nanocrystals (e.g., Fe3O4, γ-Fe2O3) have attracted much attention due to their unique magnetic properties and important applications such as targeted drug delivery [1, 2], biomolecular separations [3, 4], treatment of hyperthermia in cancer [5, 6], and as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [7, 8]. Up to now, many methods have been developed to prepare Fe3O4 nanocrystals with small sizes on the nanometer scale, which include hydrothermal synthesis [9, 10], chemical coprecipitation [1113], and thermal decomposition and/or reduction [14, 15]. Besides these nanosized particles, the secondary structural superparamagnetic Fe3O4 particles have also attracted increasing attention due to their practical applications in magnetic separation and magnetic-targeted substrate delivery [16, 17]. Generally, these secondary structural Fe3O4 particles consist of small Fe3O4 nanocrystals. As-prepared Fe3O4 particles are stable in solution and reveal rapid magnetic response to the externally applied magnetic field. Over the past decade, these secondary structural Fe3O4 particles are prepared by a common two-step process, including cooperative assembly [18], microemulsion templating [19], and spontaneous assembly [20]. Compared to the two-step process of assembling the pre-synthesized Fe3O4 nanocrystals into uniform secondary structures, the direct one-step growth route to synthesize the secondary structural Fe3O4 particles seems to be a simpler way, which is also economical for large-scale production.

Herein we reported a general approach for the fabrication of monodispersed, highly water-dispersible, and superparamagnetic Fe3O4 particles by a one-step hydrothermal procedure using an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-assisted route. Biocompatible EDTA was chosen because it can act as a crystal grain growth inhibitor for the synthesis of variously sized Fe3O4 particles, and the carboxylate groups of EDTA have a strong coordination affinity to the iron cations on the Fe3O4 surface, which might favor the attachment of hydrophilic groups on the surface of the Fe3O4 particles. Herein, the Fe3O4 particles synthesized with the assistance of EDTA were also intrinsically stabilized with a layer of hydrophilic ligand in situ, which was essential for their long-term stability in aqueous media without any surface modification.


Synthesis of Fe3O4 particles

In a typical synthesis of 725 nm Fe3O4 particles, 1.3 g of anhydrous FeCl3 was first vigorously mixed with 40 mL of ethylene glycol (EG) to form a clear solution. Then, 0.47 g of EDTA was added and the mixture was heated at 110°C, followed by dissolving of anhydrous sodium acetate (NaOAc) (2.4 g), Then the mixture was transferred into a 100-mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and sealed in air. The autoclave was kept at 200°C for 10 h. The black products were collected by a magnet and washed with ethanol three times, and the products were dried at 60°C for further use.


The x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected between 20° and 80° (2θ) on an x-ray diffraction system (X’Pert Pro, PANalytical Co., Almelo, The Netherlands) with a graphite monochromator and Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were obtained (JEOL JEM-2100; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The samples for TEM and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM) analyses were prepared by spreading a drop of as-prepared magnetite nanoparticle-diluted dispersion on copper grids coated with a carbon film followed by evaporation under ambient conditions. Atom force microscope (AFM) characterization was carried out using Scan Asyst-Air (Bruker Multimode 8, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). Measurements were carried out in air, and imaging was performed in tapping mode. The height, amplitude, and phase images were recorded. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using LEO 1530 microscope (LEO, Munich, Germany).

Results and discussion

The morphology of the as-prepared Fe3O4 particles was characterized by SEM (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 1A, when FeCl3 concentration is low (0.05 mol L−1), the products are nonuniform, consisting of spherical nanocrystal clusters and small nanocrystal aggregations. However, when the FeCl3 concentration is in the range of 0.10 to 0.20 mol L−1, all of Fe3O4 particles have a nearly spherical shape (Figure 1B,C). The diameters of the particles slightly increase from 622 ± 145 nm to 717 ± 43 nm, but their sizes become more uniform with the increase of FeCl3 concentration, indicating that higher FeCl3 concentrations could lead to a larger and more uniform particle size.
Figure 1

TEM images of Fe 3 O 4 particles synthesized with different FeCl 3 concentrations. (A) 0.05. (B) 0.10. (C) 0.20 mol L−1. Inset is the corresponding particle size distribution.

The surface morphology of the as-obtained Fe3O4 particles is further shown in Figure 2. The 2D and 3D AFM images of Fe3O4 particles prepared from 0.20 mol L−1 of FeCl3 appear a nearly uniform size of about 725 nm and spherical shape, which is in good agreement to the SEM results (Figure 1C). Furthermore, a high-resolution AFM image of an isolated Fe3O4 particle (Figure 2B) also indicates that the as-prepared Fe3O4 particles are composed of small nanocrystals with the size of about 7 to 15 nm.
Figure 2

Surface morphology of the as-obtained Fe3O4 particles. (A) AFM image of Fe3O4 particles. (B) The enlarged AFM image of the isolated particles. (C) 3D image reconstruction of Fe3O4 particles.

TEM image of the as-prepared Fe3O4 particles (Figure 3A) further demonstrates their uniform sizes and morphology. The secondary structure of Fe3O4 particles also could be observed more clearly in Figure 3B for the isolated cluster, indicating that the obtained Fe3O4 particles are compact clusters. The HR-TEM image recorded at the edge of the Fe3O4 particles is shown in Figure 3C. Measuring the distance between two adjacent planes in a specific direction gives a value of 0.30 nm, corresponding to the lattice spacing of (220) planes of cubic magnetite [21, 22]. The SAED pattern (Figure 3D) shows polycrystalline-like diffraction, suggesting that the as-prepared Fe3O4 particles consist of magnetite nanocrystals.
Figure 3

Uniform sizes and morphology of the as-prepared Fe 3 O 4 particles. TEM images (A, B) and HR-TEM image (C) of the as-prepared Fe3O4 particles. SAED pattern of the particle in B (D).

The effects of EDTA concentration on the particle sizes and grain sizes of Fe3O4 particles are further investigated. Without addition of EDTA, the resultant products have a heterogeneous size distribution and their shapes are nonuniform (Figure 4A,F). When the initial EDTA concentration is increased from 10 to 40 mmol L−1, the sizes of Fe3O4 particles decrease slightly from 794 ± 103 nm to 717 ± 43 nm (Figure 4B,C,D and 4G,H,I) and their size distribution becomes more uniform. However, when the EDTA concentration further increases to 80 mmol L−1, their sizes decrease significantly to 409 ± 70 nm while their size distribution becomes heterogeneous again (Figure 4E,J), indicating that higher EDTA concentration favors the formation of Fe3O4 particles with larger size; their size distribution, however, is EDTA concentration dependent.
Figure 4

TEM images and XRD patterns of Fe 3 O 4 particles. (A-E) TEM images and (F-J) XRD patterns of Fe3O4 particles synthesized with different EDTA concentrations: 0, 10, 20, 40, and 80 mol L−1, respectively.

To confirm the effects of EDTA concentration on the grain sizes and the corresponding crystalline structures and phase composition of the as-prepared Fe3O4 particles, the samples obtained with different EDTA concentrations are characterized by XRD. As shown in Figure 5, all the diffraction peaks are indexed to the spinel structure, known for the Fe3O4 crystal (JCPDS no. 00-003-0863) and no other peaks are detected, indicating that the products are pure phase Fe3O4. In addition, as the EDTA concentration increases, the broadening in the diffraction peaks becomes more pronounced. The grain sizes of the Fe3O4 particles calculated from the breadth of the (311) reflection using Debye-Scherrer’s formula [23, 24] decrease dramatically from 14.8 to 7.6 nm when the initial EDTA concentration increases from 0 to 80 mmol L−1. It is thus concluded that EDTA could act as a stabilizer, which might significantly suppress the grain growth of the as-synthesized Fe3O4 particles.
Figure 5

XRD patterns of Fe 3 O 4 particles synthesized with different EDTA concentrations. (A) 0, (B) 10, (C) 20, (D) 40, and (E) 80 mol L−1, respectively.

As a consequence, a probable mechanism which leads to the resulting Fe3O4 particles with tunable grain size and particle size is proposed as follows (Figure 6). When EDTA is introduced to the FeCl3/EG solution, a significant amount of Fe-EDTA complex is formed. NaOAc is then added and utilized as an alkali source. In the presence of EG and EDTA, Fe3O4 crystallites are formed first under alkaline condition, followed by further growth into Fe3O4 nanoparticles as the prolonging of reaction time in this system. The primary Fe3O4 nanoparticles then gradually aggregate into large particles to minimize the surface energy. In addition, because of the strong coordination between Fe(III) ions and carboxylate on the surface of particles [9, 14, 25], the as-prepared Fe3O4 particles also possess a coating of carboxylate and could be easily dispersed in water (inset in Figure 7). When a magnet is applied, the particles could be completely separated from the solution within seconds. Once the magnet is withdrawn, the particles could be redispersed into the water immediately by slight shaking. Furthermore, by increasing the amount of EDTA, more carboxylate groups could bind to the surface of Fe3O4 particles through the strong coordinating ligand. This results in a decrease of the size of Fe3O4 grains and particles. Magnetic properties (M-H curves) of Fe3O4 particles synthesized with EDTA over the concentration range of 0 to 40 mmol L−1 are shown in Figure 7. It is obvious that all the Fe3O4 particles have no remanence or coercivity at 300 K and their magnetic properties are strongly dependent on the sizes of Fe3O4 particles prepared. When the initial EDTA concentration is increased from 10 to 40 mmol L−1, the sizes of Fe3O4 particles slightly decrease from 794 ± 103 nm to 717 ± 43 nm. Their magnetization saturation (Ms) values simultaneously suffer a corresponding decrease from 74.9 to 48.0 emu g−1. This result also suggests that lower EDTA concentration favors the formation of Fe3O4 particles with better crystallinity, which is in good agreement to the XRD results.
Figure 6

Schematic representation of the formation of Fe 3 O 4 particles with tunable grain size and particle size.
Figure 7

Hysteresis loops of the Fe 3 O 4 particles obtained with EDTA concentrations. Inset was the photographs of an aqueous solution of Fe3O4 particles without magnetic field and with the externally applied magnetic field.


In summary, a modified solvothermal approach was used to synthesize monodispersed Fe3O4 particles with the assistance of EDTA, which are composed of numerous primary Fe3O4 nanocrystals with sizes of 7 to 15 nm. Their sizes could be easily tuned over a wide range of 400 to 800 nm by simply varying the concentration of FeCl3 or EDTA. More importantly, owing to the presence of the carboxylate groups attached on the surface, the Fe3O4 particles have excellent water dispersibility and dispersing stability. In addition, the growth mechanism of the secondary structural Fe3O4 particles is discussed. The magnetite particles are also superparamagnetic at room temperature and have a high magnetization, which enhance their response to external magnetic field and therefore should greatly facilitate the manipulation of the particles in practical uses.



This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31271071 and 81072472) and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (grant no. 2012 J01416) and The Medical Science and Technology Innovation Project of Nanjing Military Command (10MA078, 2010).

Authors’ Affiliations

The Affiliated Southeast Hospital of Xiamen University
Department of Radiology, Taishan Medical University
Research Center of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomaterials, College of Materials, Xiamen University
Organ Transplantation Institute, Medical College, Xiamen University
Anti-Cancer Research Center, Medical College, Xiamen University


  1. Majeed MI, Lu Q, Yan W, Li Z, Hussain I, Tahir MN, Tremel W, Tan B: Highly water-soluble magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles for drug delivery: enhanced in vitro therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin and MION conjugates. J Mater Chem B 2013, 1: 2874–2884. 10.1039/c3tb20322kView Article
  2. Veiseh O, Gunn J, Zhang M: Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2010, 62: 284–304. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.002View Article
  3. Hao R, Xing R, Xu Z, Hou Y, Gao S, Sun S: Synthesis, functionalization, and biomedical applications of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles. Adv Mater 2010, 22: 2729–2742. 10.1002/adma.201000260View Article
  4. Xu F, Geiger JH, Baker GL, Bruening ML: Polymer brush-modified magnetic nanoparticles for his-tagged protein purification. Langmuir 2011, 27: 3106–3112. 10.1021/la1050404View Article
  5. Xie J, Liu G, Eden HS, Ai H, Chen X: Surface-engineered magnetic nanoparticle platforms for cancer imaging and therapy. Acc Chem Res 2011, 44(10):883–892. 10.1021/ar200044bView Article
  6. Hayashi K, Ono K, Suzuki H, Sawada M, Moriya M, Sakamoto W, Yogo T: One-pot biofunctionalization of magnetic nanoparticles via thiol − ene click reaction for magnetic hyperthermia and magnetic resonance imaging. Chem Mater 2010, 22: 3768–3772. 10.1021/cm100810gView Article
  7. Yoo D, Lee JH, Shin TH, Cheon J: Theranostic magnetic nanoparticles. Acc Chem Res 2011, 44(10):863–874. 10.1021/ar200085cView Article
  8. Li Z, Yi PW, Sun Q, Lei H, Li Zhao H, Zhu ZH, Smith SC, Lan MB, Lu GQ: Ultrasmall water-soluble and biocompatible magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as positive and negative dual contrast agents. Adv Funct Mater 2012, 22: 2387–2393. 10.1002/adfm.201103123View Article
  9. Shen L, Bao J, Wang D, Wang Y, Chen Z, Ren L, Zhou X, Ke XB, Chen M, Yang AQ: One-step synthesis of monodisperse, water-soluble ultra-small Fe3O4 nanoparticles for potential bio-application. Nanoscale 2012, 5: 2133–2141.View Article
  10. Hu F, MacRenaris KW, Waters EA, Liang T, Schultz-Sikma EA, Eckermann AL, Meade TJ: Ultrasmall, water-soluble magnetite nanoparticles with high relaxivity for magnetic resonance imaging. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 20855–20860. 10.1021/jp907216gView Article
  11. Ngo TH, Tran DL, Do HM, Tran VH, Le VH, Nguyen XP: Facile and solvent-free routes for the synthesis of size-controllable Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Adv Nat Sci 2010, 1: 035001.
  12. Wu S, Sun A, Zhai F, Wang J, Xu W, Zhang Q, Volinsky AA: Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles synthesis from tailings by ultrasonic chemical co-precipitation. Mater Lett 2011, 65: 1882–1884. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.03.065View Article
  13. Liu Y, Liu P, Su Z, Li F, Wen F: Attapulgite–Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles via co-precipitation technique. Appl Surf Sci 2008, 255: 2020–2025. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.193View Article
  14. Mejías R, Perez-Yague S, Gutiérrez L, Cabrera LI, Spada R, Acedo P, Serna CJ, Lázaro FJ, Villanueva A, Morales MP, Barber DF: Dimercaptosuccinic acid-coated magnetite nanoparticles for magnetically guided in vivo delivery of interferon gamma for cancer immunotherapy. Biomaterials 2011, 32: 2938–2952. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.008View Article
  15. Wang X, Zhao Z, Qu J, Wang Z, Qiu J: Shape-control and characterization of magnetite prepared via a one-step solvothermal route. Cryst Growth Des 2010, 7(10):2863–2869.View Article
  16. Lee SH, Yu S-H, Lee JE, Jin A, Lee DJ, Lee N, Jo H, Shin K, Ahn TY, Kim YW, Cheo H, Sung YE, Hyeon T: Self-assembled Fe3O4 nanoparticle clusters as high-performance anodes for lithium ion batteries via geometric confinement. Nano Lett 2013, 13: 4249–4256. 10.1021/nl401952hView Article
  17. Gao J, Ran X, Shi C, Cheng H, Cheng T, Su Y: One-step solvothermal synthesis of highly water-soluble, negatively charged superparamagnetic Fe3O4 colloidal nanocrystal clusters. Nanoscale 2013, 5: 7026–7033. 10.1039/c3nr00931aView Article
  18. Qiu P, Jensen C, Charity N, Towner R, Mao C: Oil phase evaporation-induced self-assembly of hydrophobic nanoparticles into spherical clusters with controlled surface chemistry in an oil-in-water dispersion and comparison of behaviors of individual and clustered iron oxide nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132: 17724–17732. 10.1021/ja102138aView Article
  19. Chang EP, Hatton TA: Membrane emulsification and solvent pervaporation processes for the continuous synthesis of functional magnetic and Janus nanobeads. Langmuir 2012, 28: 9748–9758. 10.1021/la301196zView Article
  20. Toprak MS, McKenna BJ, Mikhaylova M, Waite JH, Stucky GD: Spontaneous assembly of magnetic microspheres. Adv Mater 2007, 19: 1362–1368. 10.1002/adma.200602114View Article
  21. Xie G, Xi P, Liu H, Chen F, Huang L, Shi Y, Hou F, Zeng Z, Shao C, Wang J: A facile chemical method to produce superparamagnetic graphene oxide-Fe3O4 hybrid composite and its application in the removal of dyes from aqueous solution. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 1033–1039. 10.1039/c1jm13433gView Article
  22. Cheng W, Tang K, Qi Y, Sheng J, Liu Z: One-step synthesis of superparamagnetic monodisperse porous Fe3O4 hollow and core-shell spheres. J Mater Chem 2010, 20: 1799–1805. 10.1039/b919164jView Article
  23. Xiao L, Shen H, von Hagen R, Pan J, Belkoura L, Mathur S: Microwave assisted fast and facile synthesis of SnO2 quantum dots and their printing applications. Chem Comm 2010, 46: 6509–6511. 10.1039/c0cc01156hView Article
  24. Zhang S, Liu X, Zhou L, Peng W: Magnetite nanostructures: one-pot synthesis, superparamagnetic property and application in magnetic resonance imaging. Mater Lett 2012, 68: 243–246.View Article
  25. Charkoudian LK, Franz KJ: Fe(III)-coordination properties of neuromelanin components: 5,6-dihydroxyindole and 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid. Inorg Chem 2006, 45: 3657–3664. 10.1021/ic060014rView Article


© Yi et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.