Open Access

Hydrothermal growth of TiO2 nanowire membranes sensitized with CdS quantum dots for the enhancement of photocatalytic performance

  • Yang Li1, 2,
  • Lili Zhang1,
  • Wenjian Wu1,
  • Peng Dai1,
  • Xinxin Yu1,
  • Mingzai Wu1Email author and
  • Guang Li1
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:270

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-270

Received: 3 March 2014

Accepted: 21 May 2014

Published: 29 May 2014


In this paper, TiO2 nanowires (NWs) on Ti foils were prepared using a simple hydrothermal approach and annealing treatment. CdS quantum dots (QDs) were assembled onto the crystallized TiO2 NWs by sequential chemical bath deposition. Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra showed that CdS adds bands in the visible to the TiO2 absorption and exhibited a broad absorption band in the visible region, which extended the scope of absorption spectrum and helped improve the photocatalytic degradation efficiency. The results of photocatalytic experiment revealed that CdS-TiO2 NWs possessed higher photocatalytic activities toward methyl orange than pure TiO2 nanowires. The degradation efficiency of 96.32% after ten cycles indicated that the as-prepared CdS-TiO2 composite exhibited excellent long-time recyclable ability and can be reused for the degradation of contaminants.


Hydrothermal S-CBD CdS-TiO2 NWs Photocatalytic activity


Titania (titanium dioxide (TiO2)), a semiconductor photocatalyst, has attracted tremendous attentions in the past decades due to its chemical stability, low cost, high reusability, and excellent degradation efficiency of organic pollutants [13]. However, wide bandgap (approximately 3.2 eV) restricts its photocatalytic sensitivity in the UV region with only about 4% to 5% of solar spectrum falling in the UV range. So, the effective use of solar energy especially visible light remains a great challenge in practical photocatalytic applications [4, 5]. Moreover, low electron transfer rate and high recombination rate of photogenerated electrons and hole pairs also limit the enhancement of the photocatalytic efficiency to some extent, which has been recognized as a major obstacle to meet the practical application [6].

Much effort has been made to improve the photocatalystic performance of nanosized TiO2, including semiconductor coupling, nonmetal and metal doping, and surface modification [710]. CdS quantum dots (QDs) with tunable bandgap (3.5 to 2.2 eV) could inject the photo-induced electrons into the conduction band of wide bandgap semiconductors, improve the energy conversion efficiency, and hence give new opportunities to harvest light in the visible region of solar light [11], which have been reported for the CdS-sensitized TiO2 nanoparticles, nanorods, and nanotubes [1215]. Despite these achievements, the delivered sensitized TiO2 nanomaterials are supposed to create secondary pollution. The recyclability and reuse of the photocatalyst remain a challenge. In this letter, we directly grew TiO2 nanowire (NW) membranes on Ti substrates using a simple hydrothermal treatment method and sensitized TiO2 NWs with CdS QDs via chemical bath deposition (CBD) [16]. As expected, the as-prepared CdS-TiO2 composite exhibited high activity and strong durability for the photodegradation of methyl orange (MO) under simulated solar irradiation.


Synthesis of CdS-TiO2 NWs photocatalysts

All chemicals are of analytical grade and used as received. In a typical synthesis, Ti foils are cut into 15 mm × 10-mm sizes and ultrasonically cleaned in acetone, alcohol, and distilled water for 5 min, respectively. After polishing in a mixed solution of HF, HNO3, and distilled water (the volume ratio was 1:1:4) for three times, 30 mL of 1 M NaOH aqueous solution and the polished Ti foils were transferred into a 50-mL Teflon-lined autoclave, which were kept at 200°C for 48 h before cooling to room temperature naturally. The obtained foils containing TiO2 NWs were rinsed thoroughly with distilled water and then annealed at 350°C for 3 h in air atmosphere. CdS QDs were fabricated onto the TiO2 NWs by CBD approach. TiO2 NWs were sequentially immersed in two different beakers for 5 min at every turn. The first one contained 0.1 M Cd(NO3)2, and the other one contained 0.1 M Na2S in DI water. Following each immersion, the films were dried at 100°C for 30 min before the next dipping. This was called one CBD cycle. In order to make sure that the CdS QDs were uniformly deposited on the TiO2 NWs, the cycles were repeated two times, four times, and six times. The samples labeled as CdS(2)-TiO2 NWs, CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs, CdS(6)-TiO2, and CdS(10)-TiO2 NWs correspond to two, four, six, and ten CBD cycles.


The structures and morphologies of the as-obtained samples were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD; Bruker D8-ADVANCE, Ettlingen, Germany) using an 18-kW advanced X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å), scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM; JEOL-2010, Tokyo, Japan). The ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrum was measured using a U-4100 Hitachi ultraviolet-visible near-infrared spectrophotometer in the range of 240 to 800 nm.

Photocatalytic experimental details

The photocatalytic degradation experiments for MO were carried out in a self-prepared open air reactor. During the degradation procedure, the samples were stirred in a 50-mL beaker containing 40 mL of MO aqueous solution (20 mg/L) with no oxygen bubbles. Before irradiation by a 350-W xenon lamp, the adsorption equilibrium of the dye molecules on the catalyst surface was established by stirring in the dark for 30 min, and the vertical distance between the solution level and the horizontal plane of the lamp was fixed at 10 cm. At an interval of 10 min, 3 mL of solution was taken out from the reactor. The absorbance of the solution was determined on a UV-vis absorption photometer (UV-3200S, MAPADA Analytic Apparatus Ltd. Inc., Shanghai, China) at 465-nm wavelength. The visible light source was obtained using a 420-nm cutoff filter in the experiment.

Results and discussion

The XRD patterns of the CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs were acquired as shown in Figure 1. The X-ray diffraction pattern of the CdS QDs on TiO2 NWs proves the existence of CdS by its three characteristic peaks (2θ = 26.4° (111), 43.9° (220), and 51.9° (311); JCPDS card no.: 65-2887), and the other diffraction peaks attribute to the anatase phase TiO2 NWs (JCPDS card no.: 21-1272 ) and Ti foil substrate (JCPDS card no.: 44-1294).
Figure 1

XRD patterns of the as-prepared heteronanostructure of CdS QDs on TiO 2 NWs.

The SEM images of pure TiO2 NWs and CdS(4,6,10)-TiO2 NWs and the TEM and HRTEM images of CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs are presented in Figure 2. The surface of titanium foil is etched and covered with TiO2 NWs with diameter of about 15 nm. Moreover, TiO2 nanowires possess smooth surface (Figure 2a). The SEM image displays the membrane formed by overlapping and interpenetrating of the TiO2 NWs. When the deposition cycle number is four, the surfaces of the TiO2 NWs become rougher than those of the pure TiO2 NWs, indicating that the diameters of the CdS particles are in the nanoscale range (Figure 2b). For sample CdS(6)-TiO2 NWs, the surfaces of the TiO2 NWs are thoroughly covered by particles and rougher than those of the CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs (Figure 2c). With the increase of deposition cycle number to ten, the morphologies of the TiO2 NWs for the CdS(10)-TiO2 NWs are kept almost the same with those of the CdS(6)-TiO2 NWs, while the diameters of the TiO2 NWs of CdS(10)-TiO2 seem to be larger than those of CdS(6)-TiO2, which indicates that more CdS nanoparticles are deposited on the TiO2 NW surfaces (Figure 2d). To further investigate the deposition, morphology, and size of CdS, the TEM and HRTEM images of the CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs are shown in Figure 2e,f. CdS QDs with sizes about 3 to 6 nm are distributed on TiO2 NW surfaces, making the TiO2 NW surface rough. This can be further confirmed by the lattice fringes (Figure 2f) of the circular area marked in Figure 2e. The interplanar spacings are 0.35 and 0.34 nm (Figure 2f), consistent with the (101) plane of anatase TiO2 and (111) plane of CdS.
Figure 2

SEM, TEM, and HRTEM images of the TiO 2 NWs and CdS(4,6,10)-TiO 2 NWs. (a) SEM image of pure TiO2 NWs. (b) SEM image of CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs. (c) SEM image of CdS(6)-TiO2 NWs. (d) SEM image of CdS(10)-TiO2 NWs. (e) TEM image of CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs. (f) HRTEM lattice fringes of CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs.

In order to study the optical response of the CdS QD-sensitized TiO2 NW composites, UV-vis absorption spectra for samples of pure TiO2 NWs and CdS(i)-TiO2 NWs (i = 2,4,6) were shown in Figure 3a. Because pure TiO2 NW absorption is mainly UV, no significant absorbance for visible light could be seen, which is consistent with its large energy gap. For CdS(i)-TiO2 NWs (i = 2,4), both TiO2 absorption edge and CdS absorption edge can be detected, as shown in Figure 3c,d, and the corresponding bandgaps of CdS nanoparticles shift from 2.58 to 2.44 eV, respectively. While for the CdS(6)-TiO2 NWs, the calculated bandgap is 2.25 eV, as shown in Figure 3e. The absorption intensity in the visible light range is vital to the improvement of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2.
Figure 3

UV-vis absorption spectra of TiO 2 and CdS(2,4,6)-TiO 2 NWs and their band gaps. (a) UV-vis absorption spectra of TiO2 NWs and CdS(2,4,6)-TiO2 NWs. The bandgap of the samples synthesized by different S-CBD cycles: (b) 2 times, (c) 2 times, (d) 4 times, and (e) 6 times.

The photocatalytic activities of the as-prepared samples were evaluated by the degradation of MO aqueous solution under xenon lamp irradiation. Using the Beer-Lambert law, the degradation efficiency (D) of the MO aqueous solution can be calculated by the following expression:
D = A 0 A t A 0 × 100 % ,
where A0 and A t are the absorbance of the characteristic absorption peak of MO at 465 nm in aqueous solution before and after irradiation for a given time. Figure 4 shows the time-dependent photocatalytic degradation efficiency curve of the pure TiO2 NWs and CdS(i)-TiO2 NWs (i = 2,4,6,10) under simulated solar irradiation and visible irradiation. The photodegradation efficiencies for pure TiO2 NWs and CdS(i)-TiO2 NWs (i = 2,4,6) under simulated solar irradiation are 51.96%, 95.65%, 98.83%, and 94.08%, respectively, after 120-min irradiation, as shown in Figure 4a. Clearly, CdS sensitization increases the photocatalytic efficiency. However, higher CdS concentration does not necessarily lead to better photocatalytic activity. Because higher CdS decoration would cover more surface area of TiO2 NWs, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 NWs in the ultraviolet light range is hence reduced.
Figure 4

Photocatalytic degradation efficiencies. (a) Pure TiO2 NWs and CdS(i)-TiO2 NWs (i = 2,4,6) for MO solution under simulated solar irradiation. (b) Pure TiO2 NWs and CdS(i)-TiO2 NWs (i = 2,4,6) for MO solution under visible irradiation obtained using a 420-nm cutoff filter. (c) The cycling experiment for the as-prepared photocatalysts for MO using sample CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs.

Figure 4b shows the photocatalytic efficiency curves of the pure TiO2 NWs and CdS(i)-TiO2 NWs (i = 2,4,6,10) under visible light irradiation obtained with a 420-nm cutoff filter. In this case, the efficiencies are 2.81%, 35.52%, 38.59%, 42.69%, and 41.23% in 120 min, respectively. The photocatalytic efficiencies increase slightly with the increase of CdS dosages at first and then become saturated under visible irradiation; the photocatalytic activity is greatly reduced, and almost no activity is observed for the pure TiO2 NWs.

The synergistic effect mechanism is proposed for the understanding of charge generation and transportation for CdS(i)-TiO2 NWs (i = 2,4,6,10). The coupling between a UV-excited semiconductor (TiO2) and a visible light-excited semiconductor (CdS) can effectively enhance the solar energy utilization efficiency, especially in visible light regime. CdS possesses higher conduction band and valence band than TiO2[9, 14, 15]. The band configuration induces the transfer of photogenerated electrons from CdS to TiO2 and photogenerated holes from TiO2 to CdS, which makes charge separation effective. Under simulated solar irradiation, the CdS particles and TiO2 NWs could both be excited; photogenerated electrons and holes are transported to the TiO2 NWs surfaces and CdS particles' surface, respectively; while under visible light irradiation, only the CdS particles could be excited. Photogenerated electrons are transported to the inner TiO2 NW surfaces, and holes are kept on the CdS particles' surface, which reduces the photocatalytic activity when compared with simulated solar irradiation. At first, with the increase of deposition cycle number, more CdS particles are deposited on the TiO2 NW surfaces, more photogenerated electrons are generated by the visible light irradiation, and accordingly, the photodegradation efficiency is increased.

When the deposition cycle numbers are 6 and 10, the TiO2 NW surfaces are thoroughly covered with CdS nanoparticles. For sample CdS(10)-TiO2 NWs, the inner CdS nanoparticles on the TiO2 NW surfaces cannot receive visible light irradiation, whose photocatalytic efficiency has been saturated and almost the same with that of sample CdS(6)-TiO2 NWs. Based on the above mechanism, it is understood that a remarkable absorption enhancement with the increase of deposition cycle number could not be translated to major photocatalytic efficiency increase. In addition, due to its photocorrosion, CdS QDs have been often exploited to sensitize a certain semiconductor with regulated band configuration and help separate the photogenerated electrons and holes [17]. In order to evaluate the photodegradation of MO by plain CdS QDs, a control experiment was made. CdS QDs were prepared onto a clean glass substrate with the same size via the S-CBD approach. The cycles were repeated six times, and the photodegradation efficiency is only 11.4% after a 120-min visible irradiation, which further supports the synergistic effect mechanism between CdS QDs and TiO2 NWs.

The recyclability and ease of collection for the photocatalysts are very important in practical application. Figure 4c shows the cycling experiment for the as-prepared photocatalysts for MO using sample CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs. The degradation efficiency after 120 min reduces from 98.83% to 96.32% after ten cycles. Evidently, the photocatalytic activity for MO degradation does not change much after each cycle, revealing the excellent cycling stability of the as-prepared CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs. The undercurve inset in Figure 4c shows the photographs and photocatalytic degradation efficiency of a typical sample CdS(4)-TiO2 NWs for recycled MO reduction, which shows ease of collection for the photocatalysts.


In summary, TiO2 NWs on Ti foils were prepared using simple hydrothermal treatment followed by annealing. CdS QDs were decorated on the obtained TiO2 NWs by simple S-CBD technique. The deposited CdS QDs on the surface of the TiO2 NWs could efficiently extend the scope of absorption spectrum from 390 to 600 nm and greatly enhanced the photocatalytic activity in comparison with pure TiO2 NWs under simulated solar irradiation and visible irradiation. In addition, the as-prepared CdS-TiO2 NW composite photocatalysts also exhibited excellent long-time recyclable ability for organic pollutant degradation.



This work was financed by the 211 project of Anhui University, National Natural Science Foundation of China (50901074, 61290301, 51072001, 11174002, 51272001, and 51272003), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Fund (11040606 M49), and Higher Educational Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (KJ2012A007 and KJ2012A083).

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Physics and Materials Science, Anhui University
School of Science, Anhui University of Science and Technology


  1. Chin SM, Park E, Minsu K, Jurng JS: Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue with TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by a thermal decomposition process. Powder Technol 2010, 201: 171–176. 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.03.034View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ismail AA, Bahnemann DW: One-step synthesis of mesoporous platinum/titania nanocomposites as photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity for methanol oxidation. Green Chem 2011, 13: 428–435. 10.1039/c0gc00744gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hu A, Zhang X, Oakes KD, Peng P, Zhou YN, Servos MR: Hydrothermal growth of free standing TiO2 nanowire membranes for photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals. J Hazard Mater 2011, 189: 278–285. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.033View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen CS, Xie XD, Cao SY, Liu QC, Kuang JC, Mei YP, Zhao GJ: Preparation and photocatalytic property of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/TiO2 nanohybrids. Funct Mater Lett 2013, 6: 1350018. 10.1142/S1793604713500185View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang YJ, Wang QS, Zhan XY, Wang FM, Safdar M, He J: Visible light driven type II heterostructures and their enhanced photocatalysis properties: a review. Nanoscale 2013, 5: 8326–8339. 10.1039/c3nr01577gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yang JK, Zhang XT, Liu H, Wang CH, Liu SP, Sun PP, Wang LL, Liu YC: Heterostructured TiO2/WO3 porous microspheres: preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties. Catal Today 2013, 201: 195–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sakthivel S, Janczarek M, Kisch H: Visible light activity and photoelectrochemical properties of nitrogen-doped TiO2. J Phys Chem B 2004, 108: 19384–19387. 10.1021/jp046857qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Li HX, Bian ZF, Zhu J, Huo YN, Li H, Lu YF: Mesoporous Au/TiO2 nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129: 4538–4539. 10.1021/ja069113uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Xiao N, Li ZH, Liu JW, Gao Y: A facile template-free method for preparing bi-phase TiO2 nanowire arrays with high photocatalytic activity. Mater Lett 2010, 64: 1776–1778. 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.05.035View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Huo YN, Yang XL, Zhu J, Li HX: Highly active and stable Cds-TiO2 visible photocatalyst prepared by in situ sulfurization under supercritical conditions. Appl Catal B: Environ 2011, 106: 69–75.Google Scholar
  11. Kang SH, Lee WJ, Kim HS: Effects of CdS sensitization on single crystalline TiO2 nanorods in photoelectrochemical cells. Mater Lett 2012, 85: 74–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Liou YH, Kao LC, Tsai MC, Lin CJ: Deposition of CdS nanoparticles within free-standing both-side-open stretched TiO2, nanotube-array films for the enhancement of photoelectrochemical performance. Electrochem Commun 2012, 15: 66–69. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.11.029View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao P, Liu JC, Zhang T, Sun DD, Ng WJ: Hierarchical TiO2/CdS “spindle-like” composite with high photodegradation and antibacterial capability under visible light irradiation. J Hazard Mater 2012, 229–230: 209–216.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu BK, Wang DJ, Wang LL, Sun YJ, Lin YH, Zhang XQ, Xie TF: Glutathione-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of CdS-decorated TiO2 nanorod arrays for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim Acta 2013, 113: 661–667.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu GS, Tian M, Chen AC: Synthesis of CdS quantum-dot sensitized TiO2 nanowires with high photocatalytic activity for water splitting. J Photoch Photobio A Chem 2012, 233: 65–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Xia MX, Wang FX, Wang YC, Pan AL, Zou BS, Zhang QL, Wang YG: TiO2 nanowires sensitized with CdS quantum dots and the surface photovoltage properties. Mater Lett 2010, 64: 1688–1690. 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.05.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Li X, Xia T, Xu CH, Murowchick J, Chen XB: Synthesis and photoactivity of nanostructured CdS-TiO2 composite catalysts. Catal Today 2014, 225: 64–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Li et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.