Open Access

HAI-178 antibody-conjugated fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles for targeted imaging and simultaneous therapy of gastric cancer

  • Can Wang1,
  • Chenchen Bao2,
  • Shujing Liang2,
  • Lingxia Zhang3,
  • Hualin Fu2,
  • Yutian Wang4,
  • Kan Wang2,
  • Chao Li2,
  • Min Deng2,
  • Qiande Liao1Email author,
  • Jian Ni2 and
  • Daxiang Cui2Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:274

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-274

Received: 11 April 2014

Accepted: 15 May 2014

Published: 30 May 2014

Abstract

The successful development of safe and highly effective nanoprobes for targeted imaging and simultaneous therapy of in vivo gastric cancer is a great challenge. Herein we reported for the first time that anti-α-subunit of ATP synthase antibody, HAI-178 monoclonal antibody-conjugated fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles, was successfully used for targeted imaging and simultaneous therapy of in vivo gastric cancer. A total of 172 specimens of gastric cancer tissues were collected, and the expression of α-subunit of ATP synthase in gastric cancer tissues was investigated by immunohistochemistry method. Fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles were prepared and conjugated with HAI-178 monoclonal antibody, and the resultant HAI-178 antibody-conjugated fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles (HAI-178-FMNPs) were co-incubated with gastric cancer MGC803 cells and gastric mucous GES-1 cells. Gastric cancer-bearing nude mice models were established, were injected with prepared HAI-178-FMNPs via tail vein, and were imaged by magnetic resonance imaging and small animal fluorescent imaging system. The results showed that the α-subunit of ATP synthase exhibited high expression in 94.7% of the gastric cancer tissues. The prepared HAI-178-FMNPs could target actively MGC803 cells, realized fluorescent imaging and magnetic resonance imaging of in vivo gastric cancer, and actively inhibited growth of gastric cancer cells. In conclusion, HAI-178 antibody-conjugated fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles have a great potential in applications such as targeted imaging and simultaneous therapy of in vivo early gastric cancer cells in the near future.

Keywords

HAI-178 antibody Fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles Fluorescent imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Gastric cancer Nude mice model

Background

Gastric cancer is the second most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death in China [13]. It remains very difficult to cure effectively, primarily because most patients present with advanced diseases [4]. Therefore, how to recognize and track or kill early gastric cancer cells is a great challenge for early diagnosis and therapy of patients with gastric cancer.

We have tried to establish an early gastric cancer pre-warning and diagnosis system since 2005 [5, 6]. We hoped to find early gastric cancer cells in vivo by multi-mode targeting imaging and serum biomarker detection techniques [712]. Our previous studies showed that subcutaneous and in situ gastric cancer tissues with 5 mm in diameter could be recognized and treated by using multi-functional nanoprobes such as BRCAA1-conjugated fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles [13], her2 antibody-conjugated RNase-A-associated CdTe quantum dots [14], folic acid-conjugated upper conversion nanoparticles [15, 16], RGD-conjugated gold nanorods [17], ce6-conjugated carbon dots [18], ce6-conjugated Au nanoclusters (Au NCs) [19, 20]. However, the clinical translation of these prepared nanoprobes still exists as a great challenge because no one kind of biomarker is specific for gastric cancer. Looking for new potential biomarker of gastric cancer and development of safe and effective nanoprobes for targeted imaging and simultaneous therapy of in vivo early gastric cancer have become our concerns.

Dr. Jian Ni et al. found that the α-subunit of ATP synthase exhibited over-expression in breast cancer cell lines such as MCF-7H and MCF-7 cell line, with different metastasis potentials, and also exhibited high expression in breast cancer tissues, hepatocellular carcinoma, colon cancer, and prostate cancer [21]. ATP synthase is responsible for ATP production in oxidative phosphorylation and can work in reverse as a proton-pumping ATPase [22, 23]. ATP synthase expression is localized exclusively in the mitochondria where it generates most cellular ATP. However, ATP synthase components have recently been identified as cell-surface receptors for apparently unrelated ligands in the course of studies carried out on angiogenesis [2426], lipoprotein metabolism [27], innate immunity [2832], etc. by immunofluorescence, biochemistry, and proteomics analyses. Its molecular mechanism, function, and significance have not been clarified well.

Dr. Jian Ni's group prepared specific monoclonal antibody against the α-subunit of ATP synthase, named as HAI-178 antibody, and provided this to my group. Our primary studies showed that the α-subunit of ATP synthase also exhibited over-expression in gastric cancer cells and clinical gastric cancer tissues, with no or very low expression in normal gastric mucous tissues. Especially as one kind of self antibody which existed in human sera from patients with gastric cancer, this should be a potential biomarker with diagnosis value. In our previous work, we prepared fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles (FMNPs) composed of silicon-wrapped magnetic nanoparticles and CdTe quantum dots and used FMNPs-labeled MSC cells to realize the targeted imaging and hyperthermia therapy of in vivo gastric cancer [33]. We also confirmed that the prepared fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles show good biocompatibility [34].

In the present study, we fully used the advantages of FMNPs and potential gastric cancer biomarker α-subunit of ATP synthase, prepared HAI-178 monoclonal antibody-conjugated FMNPs, and investigated the feasibility of prepared nanoprobes to target in vitro and in vivo gastric cancer cells. Our results show that as-prepared nanoprobes can be used for in vivo dual-model imaging and therapy of in vivo cancer, and have great potential in applications such as dual-model imaging and simultaneous therapy of early gastric cancer in the near future.

Methods

All animal experiments (no. SYXK2007-0025) were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Expression of α-subunit of ATP synthase in gastric cancer tissues

HAI-178 monoclonal antibody was presented as a gift by Dr. Jian Ni. HAI-178 monoclonal antibody was used as first antibody to stain 172 specimens of gastric cancer and control gastric mucous tissues with immunohistochemistry method [35], which were collected from Xi’an Central Hospital, Xianya Hospital, Changzheng Hospital, and the First People's Hospital in Shanghai, and identified by pathological examination.

Preparation and Surface functionalization of FMNPs

FMNPs were prepared according to our previous report [3638]. Before coupling the FMNPs with the HAI-178 antibody, we first functionalized the surface functional group of FMNPs as carboxyl group. Solutions of 95 mL ethanol and 2 mL 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APS) were added to form a mixed solution and allowed to react at room temperature for 24 h. The aminosilane-modified FMNPs were separated by permanent magnet and were washed with deionized water three times then redispersed the FMNPs-NH2 in 100 mL dimethylformamide (DMF) and added with excess succinic anhydride to form a mixed solution and react at room temperature for 24 h. The carboxyl-modified FMNPs were separated by permanent magnet again and washed with deionized water three times.

Preparation and characterization of HAI-178 monoclonal antibody-conjugated FMNPs

We used a two-step process to obtain stable HAI-178-antibody-FMNPs conjugation. Solution of 1.5 mg FMNPs-COOH was dispersed in 2 mL pH 7 PBS buffer and was sonicated for 10 min. Then we mixed 1 mL of fresh 400 mM EDC and 100 mM NHSS in pH 6.0 MES buffer and rotated it at room temperature for 15 min. After this, the resulting solution was separated by magnetic field, and 1 mg/mL of HAI-178 monoclonal antibody was added to the above mixture and stirred in dark place for 2 h. To remove free HAI-178 antibody, the residual reaction mixture was separated by magnetic field and the solid remaining was washed with 1 mL of PBS buffer three times. Finally, 1 mL of 0.05% Tween-20/PBS was added to the HAI-178 antibody-FMNPs conjugation and the bioconjugation was stored at 4°C. When used, this HAI-178 antibody-FMNPs conjugation should be diluted with PBS/0.05% Tween-20. Then we used the Nano Drop device to quantify the coupling rate of HAI-178 antibody with FMNPs-COOH. Before the coupling reaction, we measured the total concentration of HAI-178 antibody. After the coupling reaction, we measured the HAI-178 antibody concentration in residual reaction mixture and calculated the coupling rate according the equation:

Coupling (%) = (1 − Concentration of HAI-178 antibody in residual reaction mixture/Total concentration of HAI-178 antibody) × 100. The as-prepared nanoprobes and pure FMNPs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, photoluminescence (PL) spectrometry, and fluorescent microscopy.

Nanoprobes for in vitro targeting imaging of gastric cancer cells

Gastric cancer cell line MGC803 cells with over-expression of α-subunit of ATP synthase were used as target cells, and human gastric mucous GES-1 cells without expression of α-subunit of ATP synthase was used as control. The cells were cultured and collected, then were treated with 50 μg/mL HAI-178 antibody-conjugated FMNPs nanoprobes, and cultured in a humidified 5% CO2-balanced air incubator at 37°C for 4 h. Meanwhile, the MGC803 and GES-1 cells were treated with FMNPs as the control group. Afterward, the cells were rinsed with PBS three times, and then the cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution for 30 min. For nuclear counterstaining, MGC803 cells were incubated with 1 mM Hoechst 33258 (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in PBS for 5 min. The cells were observed and imaged using fluorescence microscope (Nikon TS100-F, Nikon Instruments, Shanghai, China).

Nanoprobes for fluorescence imaging of gastric cancer-bearing nude mice

Animal experiments were performed according to Guidelines for Animal Care and Use Committee, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Male athymic nude mice were obtained from Shanghai LAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd., Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). MGC803 cells (1 × 106) were injected subcutaneously into the right anterior flank area of the male nude mice with 4 to 5 weeks of age. The tumors were allowed to grow to a diameter of approximately 5 mm. At that point, about 40 μg HAI-178 antibody-FMNPs nanoprobes was injected into the mice (n = 3) via the tail vein. Mice were respectively monitored in a non-invasive manner at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, and 12 h to get fluorescence images. Then, tumor and major organs were collected, were placed on black papers, and subjected to IVIS Lumina imaging system (Xenogen) with emission wavelengths of 630 nm. The fluorescence images were acquired, and the total fluorescence flux for each sample was obtained. For the control experiment, mice (n = 3) were injected via tail vein with 40 μg of FMNPs and subjected to optical imaging at various time points post-injection. Identical illumination settings (e.g., lamp voltage, filter, exposure time) were used in all animal imaging experiments.

Nanoprobes for MRI and fluorescent imaging of gastric cancer-bearing nude mice

For MR imaging, gastric MGC803 cells (1 × 106) were injected subcutaneously into the right anterior flank area of male nude mice (n = 3) with 4 to 5 weeks of age. After the tumors reached approximately 5 mm in diameter, mice were injected with the HAI-178 antibody-FMNPs nanoprobes. MR imaging was performed at 6 h post-injections on animals anesthetized with 0.4% pentobarbital, using 3.0 T field intensity by GE HDX 3.0 T MR imaging instrument (GE Healthcare, Beijing, China) equipped with GE Signal Excite 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) software. The imaging protocol consisted of coronal and transverse T2-weighted spin echo (SE) pulse sequences. To produce T2 maps, the following imaging parameters were used: TR/TE = 1,000/10, 20, 30, 40, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 ms; FOV = 8.0 cm; NEX = 1; slice thickness = 2.0 mm; number of excitations = 2. MR imaging was performed on the mice (n = 3) model with gastric tumor, and injected FMNPs without labeling HAI-178 antibody were used for the negative control. Then, the mice models with gastric cancer were injected with 40 μg HAI-178–FMNPs via the tail vein and imaged by small animal imaging system at 6 h post-injection [13].

Nanoprobes for integrated therapy of in vivo gastric cancer

Gastric cancer-bearing mice were randomly divided into four groups: test group 1 (10 mice) (200 μg of HAI-178-FMNPs plus external alternating magnetic field with 63 kHz and 7 kA/m for 4 min), test group 2 (10 mice) (200 μg of FMNPs plus external alternating magnetic field with 63 kHz and 7 kA/m for 4 min), test group 3 (10 mice) (100 μg of HAI-178 antibody), and blank control (5 mice) (saline). Every 2 days, the mice sizes were measured up to 14 days, then the mice were sacrificed.

Effects of HAI-178-FMNPs on important organs

The mice in test group were sacrificed after in vivo imaging. For histological evaluation, excised important organs from the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney were frozen and embedded by medium at −20°C, were sectioned into 8-μm slices, were stained by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stain method, and were observed by microscopy.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was repeated three times in duplicate. The results were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical differences were evaluated using the t- test and considered significance at P < 0.05.

Results and discussion

Expression of α-subunit of ATP synthase in gastric cancer tissues

Figure 1A showed the positive expression of α-subunit of ATP synthase in gastric cancer tissues; Figure 1B showed the negative expression of α-subunit of ATP synthase in gastric mucous tissues. We investigated the expression of α-subunit of ATP synthase in 172 specimens of gastric cancer tissues by immunohistochemistry method. As shown in Table 1, α-subunit of ATP synthase exhibited over-expression in 94.7% of the gastric cancer tissues. In no or very low expression in normal gastric mucous tissues, there existed a statistical difference between two groups (P < 0.01). We also observed that the expression of α-subunit of ATP synthase is not associated with patient's age (P > 0.05) and positive lymph node and invasion (P > 0.05). However, it is positively associated with the size of tumor (P < 0.05), pathological grade (P < 0.05), and TNM stage (P < 0.05). This result highly suggests that α-subunit of ATP synthase may be a potential biomarker for most gastric cancer patients and may be very valuable for diagnosis and therapy of clinical gastric cancer patients.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-274/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2039_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Expression of α-subunit of ATP synthase in gastric cancer tissues and gastric mucous tissues (×50). (A) Positive expression in gastric cancer tissues. (B) Negative expression in normal gastric mucous tissues.

Table 1

Clinicopathological data and ATP synthase α-subunit expression in 172 gastric cancers

 

Description

α-ATP synthase expression

Total

P value

Negative

Moderate

Strong

Age

<50

5 (6.8%)

31 (42.4%)

37 (50.6%)

73 (100%)

Not significant

≥50

4 (4.0%)

32 (32.3%)

63 (63.6%)

99 (100%)

Size

<2 cm

2 (11.7%)

11 (64.7%)

4 (23.5%)

17 (100%)

P < 0.05

≥2 cm

2 (3.4%)

22 (37.9%)

31 (53.4%)

58 (100%)

Histological grade

Well

3 (11.5%)

12 (46.1%)

11 (42.3%)

26 (100%)

P < 0.05

Moderate

7 (6.0%)

43 (37.0%)

66 (56.8%)

116 (100%)

Poor

0 (0.0%)

3 (15.0%)

17 (85.0%)

20 (100%)

TNM stage

I

2 (18.1%)

5 (45.4%)

4 (36.3%)

11 (100%)

P < 0.05

II

2 (4.3%)

25 (54.3%)

19 (41.3%)

46 (100%)

III

0 (0%)

3 (23.1)

10 (76.9%)

13 (100%)

Lymph node invasion

Positive

3 (5.6%)

19 (35.8)

31 (58.4)

53 (100%)

Not significant

Negative

2 (4.5%)

13 (29.5%)

31 (70.4%)

44 (100%)

Preparation and characterization of HAI-178-FMNPs nanoprobes

As shown in Figure 2A, prepared FMNPs were composed of silica-wrapped CdTe and magnetic nanoparticles, and their sizes were 50 nm or so in diameter. As shown in Figure 2B, after FMNPs were conjugated with HAI-178 antibody, the as-prepared nanoprobes' photoluminescence (PL) intensity was lower than that of FMNPs, exhibiting a left shift of 40 nm, which was due to the decrease in the polarization rate of the surrounding molecules, resulting in the decrease of stokes displacement and finally resulting in a blue shift in the emission spectra. Figure 2C showed that prepared FMNPs exhibited green color. Figure 2D showed that the magnesium intensity of as-prepared FMNPs and magnetic nanoparticles was 3.21 emu/g.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-274/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2039_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Characterization of FMNPs and HAI-178-FMNPs. (A) HR-TEM of FMNPs. (B) PL spectra of FMNPs and HAI-178-FMNPs. (C) Fluorescent image of prepared FMNPs. (D) Magnesium of FMNPs and magnetic nanoparticles

In the course of preparing HAI-178 antibody-FMNPs nanoprobes, we found that the surface functionalization of FMNPs was very the key to conjugate HAI-178 antibody with FMNPs via covalent bond. We observed that carboxyl groups on the surface of FMNPs conjugated with HAI-178 antibody easier than amino groups on the surface of FMNPs. In our experiment, the average coupling rate of HAI-178 antibody with FMNPs-COOH was 80.29%.

Nanoprobes for targeting in vitro gastric cancer cells

The targeting ability of as-prepared nanoprobes in vitro was observed by fluorescence microscope. As shown in Figure 3A, HAI-178-conjugated FMNPs existed around MGC803 cellular membrane. HAI-178 antibody-FMNPs nanoprobes could enter into the cytoplasm of MGC803 cells after 4 h incubation with MGC803 cells, but not inside the nucleus, which highly suggests that HAI-178 antibody-conjugated FMNPs can target MGC803 cells specifically.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-274/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2039_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Fluorescent microscope observation of HAI-178-FMNPs bound to surface of MGC803 cells. (A) HAI-178-FMNPs combined to the surface of MGC803 cell membrane (×10); inset is the magnified image (×100). (B) HAI-178-FMNPs bound to the membrane of MGC803 cells, blue nucleus (DAPI staining) (×10).

Nanoprobes for fluorescent imaging of in vivo gastric cancer cells

To evaluate the tumor-targeting properties of HAI-178 antibody-conjugated FMNPs nanoprobes, MGC803 cells-bearing nude mice models were prepared and monitored under a non-invasive manner for 12 h by using IVIS fluorescence imaging system. Figure 4A showed the nude mouse loaded with MGC803 gastric cancer cells. Figure 4B showed the strong fluorescent signal in the tumor site of gastric cancer-bearing nude mouse at 12 h post-injection. Figure 4C showed that strong fluorescent signals only existed in the tumor site of gastric cancer-bearing nude mouse. These results indicated that the HAI-178 antibody-conjugated FMNPs were preferentially accumulated in the tumor tissues and highly suggest that prepared nanoprobes can target efficiently tumor tissues inside gastric cancer-bearing nude mice.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-274/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2039_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Fluorescent imaging of gastric cancer-bearing nude mouse via tail vein injection with HAI-178-FMNPs by animal imaging system. (A) Nude mouse loaded with gastric cancer. (B) Fluorescent imaging of the tumor site. (C) Overlay picture of gastric cancer-bearing nude mouse and fluorescent imaging of the tumor site.

Nanoprobes for MR imaging of gastric cancer-bearing nude mice

In vivo MR imaging was performed on nude mice loaded with subcutaneous gastric cancer at 12 h post-injection. Representative images of T2 maps were shown in Figure 5. Figure 5A showed MR image of the nude mouse loaded with gastric cancer at longitudinal section, with circle showing the tumor site; a significant change in signal intensity was observed in site of tumor, indicating that there existed accumulation of the nanoprobes in the tumor site as shown in Figure 5B, showing the MR image of nude mouse at transverse direction. Our result showed that prepared nanoprobes can be used for targeted MR imaging of in vivo gastric cancer.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-274/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2039_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

MRI image of gastric cancer-bearing nude mouse. (A) MRI image of nude mouse at longitudinal direction; circle shows tumor site. (B) MRI image of nude mice at horizontal direction; circle shows the tumor site.

Nanoprobes for therapy of gastric cancer-bearing nude mice

As shown in Figure 6, the tumor tissues in control group (treated with saline) grew very quick, and the relative tumor volume became bigger and bigger as the feeding day increased. In the test group treated with FMNPs, under external alternating magnetic field with 63 kHz and 7 kA/m for 4 min, the tumor tissues in gastric cancer-bearing mice grew slower than the mice in control group. In the test group treated with HAI-178 antibody, the tumor tissues grew slower, which highly showed that HAI-178 could inhibit the growth of gastric cancer in vivo, similar to the inhibition of growth of breast cancer in vivo[26]. In test group HAI-178-FMNPs, the tumor tissues grew slowest, which highly indicate that the prepared HAI-178-FMNPs have a therapeutic function for gastric cancer in vivo. Compared with the control group, a statistical difference existed between two groups (P < 0.05). Our results showed that the prepared HAI-178-conjugated FMNPs have a therapeutic function.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-274/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2039_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Relative tumor volume of nude mice under different treated condition.

Pathological analysis of important organs

As shown in Figure 7, we used HE staining to check important organs including the heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney, and no obvious damages were observed, which indirectly suggest that the prepared HAI-178-FMNPs nanoprobes did not damage important organs, showing good biocompatibility.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-274/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2039_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

HE staining of important organs such as the heart, liver, spleen, kidney, and lung.

Potential mechanism of targeting imaging and therapy of gastric cancer

In recent years, with the development of ‘omics,’ systems biology, and molecular imaging, a tendency of integration of multi-modality, multi-target imaging, and theranostic agents has emerged as a hotspot, a new concept called as ‘systems molecular imaging’ was suggested by Dr. Shen, which can be used to show the complexity, diversity, and in vivo biological behavior and the development and progress of disease in an organism qualitatively and quantitatively at a systems level. Ultimately, system molecular imaging should enable the physicians not only to diagnose tumors accurately but also to provide ‘on the spot’ treatment efficiently. It will become comprehensive research tools and technical means [3944].

In this study, with the aim of integrating multi-mode targeted imaging and simultaneous therapy into a nanoprobe, we prepared HAI-178 antibody-conjugated FMNPs. Our previous work showed that FMNPs are very stable and have strong fluorescent signals and magnetic intensity, as well good biocompatibility. Using the strong fluorescent signals of the as-prepared nanoprobes, we successfully obtained the targeted fluorescent images of in vivo gastric cancer tissues in tumor-bearing nude mice, and using the strong magnetic signals of the as-prepared nanoprobes, we also successfully obtained MR images of in vivo gastric cancer tissues in tumor-bearing nude mice. It is confirmed that HAI-178 antibody can inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells [21]; up to date, no report is closely associated with HAI-178 antibody to inhibit growth of gastric cancer. Our results confirmed for the first time that HAI-178 antibody could be used for therapy of in vivo gastric cancer.

How to target in vivo gastric cancer cells is a key scientific problem [45]. Up to date, no specific gastric cancer biomarkers were reported. Dr. Ni et al. found that α-subunit of ATP synthase exhibited over-expression in breast cancer tissues. In our study, we confirmed that α-subunit of ATP synthase also exhibited over-expression in 94.7% of the gastric cancer specimens, which highly indicate that the α-subunit of ATP synthase may be a potential target for gastric cancer diagnosis and therapy. We also observed that the α-subunit of ATP synthase exhibited over-expression in MGC803 cells, and we used anti-α-subunit of ATP synthase antibody, that is, HAI-178 monoclonal antibody, to conjugate with florescent magnetic nanoparticles. The resultant HAI-178 antibody-conjugated FMNPs successfully realized targeted imaging and simultaneous therapy of in vivo gastric cancer, which highly suggests that HAI-178 antibody can target, recognize, and kill in vivo cancer cells, specially gastric cancer cells. Thus, the prepared nanoprobes have a great potential in applications such as targeted dual model imaging and selective therapy of early gastric cancer.

Conclusions

We successfully prepared novel HAI-178 antibody-conjugated FMNPs nanoprobes which can be used for targeted two modal imaging of gastric cancer and have an obviously specific targeting ability toward gastric cancer tissues at 2 h of post-injection. In addition, HAI-178 antibody-conjugated FMNPs nanoprobes also exhibited inhibition of growth of gastric cancer, as first reported in this study. The as-prepared nanoprobes also can be used for hyperthermia therapy of gastric cancer under in vitro alternating magnetic field irradiation and have great potential in applications such as simultaneous targeted imaging and targeting therapy of clinical gastric cancer in the near future.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key Basic Research Program (973 Project) (No. 2011CB933100), National Natural Scientific Fund (Nos. 81225010, 81327002, and 31100717), 863 project of China (2012AA022703), Shanghai Science and Technology Fund (No. 13NM1401500), and Shanghai Jiao Tong University Innovation Fund for Postgraduates (No. AE340011).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
(2)
Institute of Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, Key Laboratory for Thin Film and Microfabrication Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Instrument Science and Technology, Bio-X Center, Research Institute of Translation Medicine, Shanghai JiaoTong University
(3)
Department of Gastroenterology, Xi’an Central Hospital
(4)
Department of Gastroenterology, Changzhen Hospital

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao YP, Xu JQ, Murray T, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58: 71–96. 10.3322/CA.2007.0010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bondy M: Cancer epidemiology and prevention. JAMA 2009, 301: 1074.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Okines A, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A: Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010, 21(Suppl 5):v50-v54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM: Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 2010, 19(8):1893–1907. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0437View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cui DX, Zhang L, Yan XJ, Zhang LX, Xu JR, Guo YH, Jin GQ, Gomez G, Li D, Zhao JR, Han FC, Zhang J, Hu JL, Fan DM, Gao HJ: A microarray-based gastric carcinoma prewarning system. World J Gastroenterol 2005, 11: 1273–1282.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen J, Wang W, Zhang T, Ji JJ, Qian QR, Lu LG, Fu HL, Jin WL, Cui DX: Differential expression of phospholipase C epsilon 1 is associated with chronic atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer. PLoS One 2012, 7(10):e47563. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047563View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fu HL, Ma Y, Lu LG, Hou P, Li BJ, Jin WL, Cui DX: TET1 exerts its tumor suppressor function by interacting with p53-EZH2 pathway in gastric cancer. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2014, 10: 1217–1230. 10.1166/jbn.2014.1861View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen J, Zhang T, Feng L, Zhang MQ, Su HC, Cui DX: Synthesis of ribonuclease-A conjugated Ag2S quantum dots clusters via biomimetic route. Mater Lett 2013, 96: 224–227.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cui DX, Pan BF, Zhang H, Gao F, Wu R, Wang JP, He R, Asahi T: Self-assembly of quantum dots and carbon nanotubes for ultrasensitive DNA and antigen detection. Anal Chem 2008, 80: 7996–8001. 10.1021/ac800992mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang P, Xu C, Lin J, Wang C, Wang X, Zhang C, Zhou X, Guo S, Cui DX: Folic acid-conjugated graphene oxide loaded with photosensitizers for targeting photodynamic therapy. Theranostics 2011, 1: 240–250.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang C, Li ZM, Liu B, Liao QD, Bao CC, Fu HL, Pan BF, Jin WL, Cui DX: Dendrimer modified SWCNTs for high efficient delivery and intracellular imaging of survivin siRNA. Nano Biomed Eng 2013, 5(3):125–130.Google Scholar
  12. Song H, He R, Wang K, Ruan J, Bao CC, Li N, Ji JJ, Cui DX: Anti-HIF-1 alpha antibody-conjugated pluronic triblock copolymers encapsulated with Paclitaxel for tumor targeting therapy. Biomaterials 2010, 31: 2302–2312. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.067View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang K, Ruan J, Qian Q, Song H, Bao CC, Kong YF, Zhang CL, Hu GH, Ni J, Cui DX: BRCAA1 monoclonal antibody conjugated fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles for in vivo targeted magnetofluorescent imaging of gastric cancer. J Nanobiotechnol 2011, 9: 23. 10.1186/1477-3155-9-23View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ruan J, Song H, Qian QR, Li C, Wang K, Bao CC, Cui DX: HER2 monoclonal antibody conjugated RNase-A-associated CdTe quantum dots for targeted imaging and therapy of gastric cancer. Biomaterials 2012, 33: 7093–7102. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhou N, Ni J, He R: Advances of upconversion nanoparticles for molecular imaging. Nano Biomed Eng 2013, 5(3):131–139.Google Scholar
  16. He M, Huang P, Zhang CL, Hu HY, Bao CC, Gao G, Chen F, Wang C, Ma JB, He R, Cui DX: Dual phase-controlled synthesis of uniform lanthanide-doped NaGdF4 upconversion nanocrystals via an OA/ionic liquid two-phase system for in vivo dual-modality imaging. Adv Funct Mater 2011, 21: 4470–4477. 10.1002/adfm.201101040View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Li ZM, Huang P, Zhang XJ, Lin J, Yang S, Liu B, Gao F, Xi P, Ren QS, Cui DX: RGD-conjugated dendrimer-modified gold nanorods for in vivo tumor targeting and photothermal therapy. Mol Pharm 2010, 7: 94–104. 10.1021/mp9001415View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang P, Lin J, Wang XS, Wang Z, Zhang CL, He M, Wang K, Chen F, Li ZM, Shen GX, Cui DX, Chen XY: Light-triggered theranostics based on photosensitizer-conjugated carbon dots for simultaneous enhanced-fluorescence imaging and photodynamic therapy. Adv Mater 2012, 24: 5104–5110. 10.1002/adma.201200650View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhou ZJ, Zhang CL, Qian QR, Ma JB, He M, Pan LY, Gao G, Fu HL, Wang K, Cui DX: Folic acid-conjugated silica capped gold nanoclusters for targeted fluorescence/X-ray computed tomography imaging. J Nanobiotechnol 2013, 11: 17. 10.1186/1477-3155-11-17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang CL, Zhou ZJ, Qian QR, Gao G, Li C, Feng LL, Wang Q, Cui DX: Glutathione-capped fluorescent gold nanoclusters for dual-modal fluorescence/X-ray computed tomography imaging. J Mater Chem B 2013, 1: 5045–5053.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Pan J, Sun LC, Tao YF, Zhou Z, Du XL, Peng L, Feng X, Wang J, Li Y-P, Liu L, Wu S-Y, Zhang Y-L, Hu S-Y, Zhao W-L, Zhu X-M, Lou G-L, Ni J: ATP synthase ecto-a-subunit: a novel therapeutic target for breast cancer. J Transl Med 2011, 9: 211. 10.1186/1479-5876-9-211View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Muller V, Cross RL: The evolution of A-, F-, and V-type ATP synthases and ATPases: reversals in function and changes in the H+/ATP coupling ratio. FEBS Lett 2004, 576(1):1–4.Google Scholar
  23. Zhang X, Niwa H, Rappas M: Mechanisms of ATPases–a multi-disciplinary approach. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2004, 5(2):89–105. 10.2174/1389203043486874View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Itoh H, Yoshida M, Yasuda R, Noji H, Kinosita K: Resolution of distinct rotational substeps by submillisecond kinetic analysis of F1-ATPase. Nature 2001, 410(6831):898–904. 10.1038/35073513View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilkens S, Zheng Y, Zhang Z: A structural model of the vacuolar ATPase from transmission electron microscopy. Micron 2005, 36(2):109–126. 10.1016/j.micron.2004.10.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Amzel LM, Bianchet MA, Leyva JA: Understanding ATP synthesis: structure and mechanism of the F1-ATPase. Mol Membr Biol 2003, 20(1):27–33. 10.1080/0968768031000066532View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rees DM, Leslie AG, Walker JE: The structure of the membrane extrinsic region of bovine ATP synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106: 21597–21601. 10.1073/pnas.0910365106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Champagne E, Martinez LO, Collet X, Barbaras R: Ecto-F1Fo ATP synthase/F1 ATPase: metabolic and immunological functions. Curr Opin Lipidol 2006, 17: 279–284. 10.1097/01.mol.0000226120.27931.76View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Chi SL, Wahl ML, Mowery YM, Shan S, Mukhopadhyay S, Hilderbrand SC, Kenan DJ, Lipes BD, Johnson CE, Marusich MF, Capaldi RA, Dewhirst MW, Pizzo SV: Angiostatin-like activity of a monoclonal antibody to the catalytic subunit of F1F0 ATP synthase. Cancer Res 2007, 67: 4716–4724. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1094View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Moser TL, Stack MS, Asplin I, Enghild JJ, Hojrup P, Everitt L, Hubchak S, Schnaper HW, Pizzo SV: Angiostatin binds ATP synthase on the surface of human endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96: 2811–2816. 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2811View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Talamillo A, Fernandez-Moreno MA, Martinez-Azorin F, Bornstein B, Ochoa P, Garesse R: Expression of the Drosophila melanogaster ATP synthase α subunit gene is regulated by a transcriptional element containing GAF and Adf-1 binding sites. Eur J Biochem 2004, 271: 4003–4013. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04336.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Guo P, Zhang C, Chen C, Trottier M, Garver K: Inter-RNA interaction of phage φ 29 pRNA to form a hexameric complex for viral DNA transportation. Mol Cell 1998, 1998(2):149–155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruan J, Ji JJ, Song H, Qian QR, Wang K, Wang C, Cui DX: Fluorescent magnetic nanoparticle-labeled mesenchymal stem cells for targeted imaging and hyperthermia therapy of in vivo gastric cancer. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 309. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-309View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruan J, Wang K, Song H, Xu X, Ji JJ, Cui DX: Biocompatibility of hydrophilic silica-coated CdTe quantum dots and magnetic nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 299. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-299View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Pan BF, Cui DX, Sheng Y, Ozkan CG, Gao F, He R, Li Q, Xu P, Huang T: Dendrimer-modified magnetic nanoparticles enhance efficiency of gene delivery system. Cancer Res 2007, 67: 8156–8163. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4762View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hu HY, Yang H, Huang P, Cui DX, Peng YQ, Zhang JC, Lu FY, Lian J, Shi DL: Unique role of ionic liquid in microwave-assisted synthesis of monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles. Chem Comm 2010, 46: 3866–3868. 10.1039/b927321bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gao G, Huang P, Zhang YX, Wang K, Qin W, Cui DX: Gram scale synthesis of superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles and fluid via a facile solvothermal route. Cryst Eng Comm 2011, 13: 1782–1785. 10.1039/c0ce00584cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. He R, You XG, Shao J, Gao F, Pan BF, Cui DX: Core/shell fluorescent magnetic silica-coated composite nanoparticles for bioconjugation. Nanotechnology 2007, 18: 315601. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/31/315601View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Shen BZ: Systems molecular imaging: right around the corner. Nano Biomed Eng 2014, 6(1):1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Abel B, Akinsule A, Andrews C, Aslan K: Plasmon-enhanced enzymatic reactions: a study of nanoparticle-enzyme distance- and nanoparticle loading-dependent enzymatic activity. Nano Biomed Eng 2011, 3(3):184–191.Google Scholar
  41. Thomas N: Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy. Nano Biomed Eng 2011, 3(2):137–143.Google Scholar
  42. Zhang JP, Cui DX: Nanoparticle-based optical detection of microRNA. Nano Biomed Eng 2013, 5(1):1–10.Google Scholar
  43. Sonay AY, Keseroğlu K, Culha M: 2D gold nanoparticle structures engineered through DNA tiles for delivery, therapy. Nano Biomed Eng 2012, 4(1):17–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang LM, Xia K, Bai YY, Lu ZY, Tang YJ, Deng Y, He NY: Synthesis of gold nanorods and their functionalization with bovine serum albumin for optical hyperthermia. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2014, 10: 1440–1449. 10.1166/jbn.2014.1932View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Jin L, Zeng X, Liu M, Deng Y, He NY: Current progress in gene delivery technology based on chemical methods and nano-carriers. Theranostics 2014, 4(3):240–255. 10.7150/thno.6914View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.