Open Access

Fabrication and characterization of well-aligned plasmonic nanopillars with ultrasmall separations

  • Guangyuan Si1Email author,
  • Xiaoxiao Jiang1,
  • Jiangtao Lv1,
  • Qiongchan Gu1 and
  • Fengwen Wang1
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:299

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-299

Received: 2 May 2014

Accepted: 7 June 2014

Published: 13 June 2014

Abstract

We show the fabrication of well-aligned gold and silver nanopillars with various array parameters via interference lithography followed by ion beam milling and compare the etching rates of these two metallic materials. Silver is suitable for fabricating ultrafine arrays with ultrasmall separations due to high milling rates. The optical properties of the fabricated nanopillars are specifically characterized from both normal incidence and oblique incident angles. Tunable surface plasmon resonances are achieved with varying structural parameters. Strong coupling effects are enabled when the separation between adjacent nanopillars is dramatically reduced, leading to useful applications in sensing and waveguiding.

Keywords

Plasmonic Nanopillars Dense arrays

Background

Known as the electromagnetic waves propagating along metal-dielectric interfaces, surface plasmons (SPs) have drawn increasing attention in recent years[15]. Many plasmon-enabled applications have been developed due to their unique optical properties and particular ability of manipulating light at the nanometer scale. Additionally, SP-based waveguides are useful for developing devices with ultrahigh sensitivity and figure of merit because the near-field of electromagnetic waves can be significantly enhanced using different plasmonic nanostructures. Various plasmonic nanostructures, including nanopillars for waveguiding[68], and bio-sensing[911], or photonic crystals for efficient cavity coupling[12], have been demonstrated recently. Moreover, extensive useful applications have been triggered by plasmonics in super-resolution imaging[1315], cloaking[1618], energy harvesting[1921], and color filtering[2225]. Various applications (plasmonic absorbers, for instance) have been reported by using nanodisks[2628] or nanopillars[29] to modify the surface profile, allowing for tight confinement of more energy inside the functional layer of a solar cell. Such nanodisks/nanopillars that act as plasmonic absorbers (also known as plasmonic blackbodies) are extremely useful for energy harvesting. Metal nanopillars or wires excited by electromagnetic waves show resonance characteristics which are highly dependent on geometric parameters. In the optical regime, metals are dispersive materials with finite conductivity. Either surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) or localized surface plasmon resonances (LSPRs) reveal salient resonance features, and the optical properties of metal nanopillars are mainly determined by their shape, size, and even the dielectric environment. Recently, the fascinating optical properties of small nanopillars/particles[3034] and other different geometries[3540] have been extensively investigated both experimentally and theoretically, providing a new pathway for manipulating light at the subwavelength scale.

Due to important advances in nanofabrication techniques, plasmonic nanostructures and related devices are presently gaining tremendous technological significance in nanophotonics and optics. Nanostructures could provide intriguing possibilities for resolving those challenges and improving device performance. Well-aligned nanopillars with perpendicular orientations to the substrate are becoming the main building blocks for new optical devices with promising potential applications[41]. Here we explore, experimentally and theoretically, the optical properties of periodic nanopillars perpendicularly aligned on the supporting substrate. Combination of interference lithography (IL) and ion beam milling (IBM) techniques enables scalable fabrication of such nanopillars with excellent dimensional control and high uniformity. Detailed experimental results show that silver (Ag) has a much higher etching rate than gold (Au) under the same milling conditions, making Ag a perfect candidate for the construction of plasmonic ultrasmall features. In addition, nanopillar arrays with ultrasmall inter-pillar separations are fabricated and optically characterized.

Methods

Quartz substrates were first cleaned with acetone in an ultrasonic bath followed by isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and deionized water washing and finally blow-dried with a nitrogen gun. Subsequently, Au or Ag films with different thicknesses were deposited on quartz substrates with 4-nm titanium as the adhesion layer by electron beam evaporation (Auto 306, Edwards, Crawley, UK) at a base pressure of about 3 × 10-7 mbar. In order to minimize the deposition-introduced roughness, low evaporation rates were applied (less than 0.03 nm/s). Afterwards, positive resist (S1805, Dow, Midland, MI, USA) was used to define nanopillar arrays on the metal (Au or Ag) layer supported by a quartz substrate (refractive index = 1.46) with a laser holography system using a 325-nm helium-cadmium laser, serving as the IBM mask after development.

During the IBM process (Microetch 1201, Veeco Instruments, Plainview, NY, USA), argon was ionized and accelerated in an electric field to a high energy level. Argon ions struck the target materials while the sample plate rotated, ensuring homogeneous removal of waste material and straight sidewalls in all features with nearly zero undercutting. The work plate was cooled and tilted 10° to the normal of the incident beam to ensure even uniformity of the ion bombardment. At last, resist residue was removed by Microposit Remover 1165 (Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and cleaned up with IPA and deionized water. Detailed milling parameters are summarized in Table 1. The measured milling rate for Au and Ag is 23 and 61 nm/min, respectively.Compared with other fabrication methods, IL has idiographic advantages. For instance, IL allows for processing a complete substrate with one single exposure or several times of full-area exposures to define complex patterns. More importantly, IL can offer the possibility to construct homogeneous micro- or nanometer-structured surfaces on areas with wafer scale that is either impossible or extremely time consuming with other patterning techniques. In addition, one can precisely control the geometry of the arrays in a wide range by changing the processing parameters such as the incident angle and exposure time. As shown in Figure 1, nanopillars with varying profiles are achieved by accurately controlling the milling conditions. One can clearly observe cone-shaped particles in Figure 1a, which were achieved by oblique milling. In Figure 1b, normal round-shaped nanopillars are shown. Rough fringes are caused by redeposition which is almost inevitable in all ion-involved milling processes. Further, Figure 1c demonstrates nanopillars with ultrasmall separations. Note that the round shapes are replaced by quadrate outlines since the individual nanopillars are approaching each other. Smallest features of approximately 10 nm are realized. Figure 1d shows the cross sections of pagoda nanopillars with high aspect ratios (100-nm average diameter and 270-nm height).
Table 1

Parameters summary for the IBM process in this work

Parameter

Value

Unit

Voltage

300

V

Current

200

mA

Suppressor

150

V

Discharge

60

V

Magnet current

485

mA

Flow rate

30

sccm

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-299/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2052_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

SEM images of nanopillars with different outlines and profiles. (a) Cone-shaped particles. (b) Normal nanopillars. (c) Nanopillars with ultrasmall separations. (d) Cross-sectional view of pagoda-shaped nanopillars. Note that the materials used in (a) and (b) and in (c) and (d) are Au and Ag, respectively.

The optical properties of the fabricated nanopillars under normal incidence were measured using a commercial system (UV-VIS-NIR microspectrophotometer QDI 2010™, CRAIC Technologies, Inc., San Dimas, CA, USA). A × 36 objective lens with the numerical aperture of 0.5 was employed with a 75-W xenon lamp which provided a broadband spectrum. Using a beam splitter, the partial power of the incident light beam was focused onto the sample surface through the objective lens. The spectrum acquisition for all measurements was performed with a sampling aperture size of 7.1 × 7.1 μm2. Transmission and reflection were measured with respect to the light through a bare quartz substrate and an aluminum mirror, respectively. To characterize the optical properties from oblique angles, an ellipsometry setup (Uvisel, Horiba Jobin Yvon, Kyoto, Japan) was employed with a broadband light source.

Results and discussion

Figure 2a demonstrates the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the top view of the fabricated Ag nanopillars with 400-nm periodicity. As can be seen, the fringe of the nanopillars presents a brighter color than the other areas due to different contrast which is caused by materials redeposition during milling. Figure 2b is the optical image of nanopillars supported by a quartz substrate with the size of 1.5 × 1.5 cm2. The corners show defects caused by fabrication imperfections since the pattern area is limited during holography and uneven distribution of resist during spin coating. The extinction spectra for nanopillar arrays with varying periodicities are plotted in Figure 2c. One can clearly observe tunable LSPRs and redshift of resonance peaks with increasing periodicities. Besides, relatively large full width at half maximum can be seen for resonance peaks after 900 nm.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-299/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2052_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

SEM image, optical image, and extinction spectra of Ag nanopillars. (a) Top-view SEM image of Ag nanopillars with 400-nm periodicity. (b) Optical image of nanopillars supported by a quartz substrate. (c) Measured extinction spectra for nanopillar arrays with varying periodicities.

Figure 3a shows the atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of the Au nanopillar array with 450-nm periodicity. As can be seen, nanopillars with uniform shapes are achieved. The measured reflectance spectra of nanopillar arrays with different incident angles (40° to 70° in 10° increments) as a function of wavelength are plotted in Figure 3b. Tunable plasmon resonance with varying incident angles can be observed. Figure 3c shows the electric near-field distribution of a single nanopillar at 30° to the incidence normal at the wavelength of 430 nm calculated by using CST microwave studio. During simulations, one unit cell was considered which consisted of a vertically oriented cylindrical Au nanopillar. Periodic boundary conditions were assigned to the lateral walls and Floquet ports were imposed on top and bottom of the unit cell to mimic an infinite periodic array with a periodicity of p = 450 nm. The nanopillar has a radius of r = 100 nm and a height of h = 200 nm. A fifth-order Drude-Lorentz model was employed to fit the measured permittivity of Au[42]. It is observed that at the wavelength corresponding to the peak of specular reflection for each angle of incidence case, the electric field exhibits curl-like patterns, concentrating near the vertical surface of the nanopillar.As mentioned above, Ag has a much higher etching rate than Au under the same milling parameters using ion beams. Therefore, Ag has a larger selectivity than Au with the same resist mask (fixed thickness) for milling. Figure 4a,b shows the top-view and oblique-view SEM images of Ag nanopillar arrays with ultrasmall gap sizes, respectively. The average measured smallest gap width is approximately 10 nm. Dome-shaped profiles can be observed from Figure 4b, which is mainly caused by materials redeposition during the milling process. Note that the gaps between neighboring nanopillars have been milled through to the surface of the substrate. Typical fabrication imperfections are highlighted with red circles.The measured absorbance spectra for two Ag nanopillar arrays with different periodicities and ultrasmall inter-pillar separations are plotted in Figure 5. The LSPRs in nanopillars can be described as a series of longitudinal standing waves with an increasing number of harmonics at shorter wavelengths. In addition, the LSPRs are laterally confined and bounded between adjacent nanopillars. The spectra also show the effect of periodicity variation and reveal different regimes. Very little radiative coupling occurs when the diffraction edge is on the high-energy side of the main LSPR since the allowed diffracted orders have higher energy than the plasmon resonance. Most of the LSPRs confined within the nanopillar array exist as higher-order modes. Note that the standing waves within the nanopillars can be influenced by the coupling of transverse plasmon modes between nanopillars, leading to different resonances described for separate nanopillars. Additionally, Fano-type line shapes are observed which result from the interference between directly transmitted and scattered energy. Such nanopillars have great potential for sensing purposes due to significantly enhanced near-field intensity which can be clearly observed from the inset of Figure 5, possessing the key advantage of plasmonic-based sensors which may enable new opportunities for sensing geometries and strategies.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-299/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2052_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

AFM image, reflectance, and electric field distributions of Au nanopillars. (a) AFM image of Au nanopillars with 450-nm periodicity. (b) Measured reflectance of Au nanopillar arrays with varying incident angles. (c) Calculated side-view (left) and top-view (right) electric field distributions of a nanopillar at 30° incidence at the wavelength of 430 nm.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-299/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2052_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Top-view (a) and oblique-view (b) SEM images of Ag nanopillar arrays with ultrasmall separations. Typical fabrication imperfections are indicated with red circles which are almost inevitable in the milling process.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-299/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2052_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Measured absorbance of Ag nanopillar arrays with 485- and 540-nm periodicities and 35- and 40-nm inter-pillar separations. The insets show the schematic diagram for experimental characterization at normal incidence and the electric field distribution at plasmon resonance.

Conclusions

To conclude, we have demonstrated the fabrication of well-aligned plasmonic nanopillars by combining IL and IBM techniques. Using arrays with different geometric parameters, tunable plasmon resonances are simply achieved. It is found that Ag has a much higher milling rate than Au under the same experimental conditions, which makes Ag suitable for constructing fine nanostructures with ultrasmall features and high aspect ratios. The optical properties of the fabricated nanopillars are characterized both experimentally and theoretically. The approach developed in this work may trigger new applications in plasmon-assisted sensing and detecting.

Abbreviations

AFM: 

atomic force microscopy

IBM: 

ion beam milling

IL: 

interference lithography

IPA: 

isopropyl alcohol

LSPRs: 

localized surface plasmon resonances

SEM: 

scanning electron microscopy

SPs: 

surface plasmons

SPPs: 

surface plasmon polaritons.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the NEU internal funding (Grant Nos. XNB201302 and XNK201406), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Grant Nos. A2013501049 and F2014501127), Science and Technology Research Funds for Higher Education of Hebei Province (Grant No. ZD20132011), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. N120323002), Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Grant No. 20130042120048), Science and Technology Foundation of Liaoning Province (Grant No. 20131031), and Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry (Grant No. 47-4).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University

References

  1. Ebbesen TW, Lezec HJ, Ghaemi HF, Thio T, Wolff PA: Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays. Nature 1998, 391: 667–669. 10.1038/35570View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Liu YJ, Zheng YB, Liou J, Chiang IK, Khoo IC, Huang TJ: All-optical modulation of localized surface plasmon coupling in a hybrid system composed of photo-switchable gratings and Au nanodisk arrays. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 7717–7722. 10.1021/jp111256uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhao Y, Nawaz AA, Lin SS, Hao Q, Kiraly B, Huang TJ: Nanoscale super-resolution imaging via metal-dielectric metamaterial lens system. J Phys D Appl Phys 2011, 44: 41501.Google Scholar
  4. Liu YJ, Hao QZ, Smalley JST, Liou J, Khoo IC, Huang TJ: A frequency-addressed plasmonic switch based on dual-frequency liquid crystals. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 091101. 10.1063/1.3483156View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhao Y, Lin SS, Nawaz AA, Kiraly B, Hao Q, Liu Y, Huang TJ: Beam bending via plasmonic lenses. Opt Express 2010, 18: 23458–23465. 10.1364/OE.18.023458View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao H, Liu C, Jeong HE, Yang P: Plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic activity of iron oxide on gold nanopillars. ACS Nano 2012, 6: 234–240. 10.1021/nn203457aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang J, Cai L, Bai W, Song G: Hybrid waveguide-plasmon resonances in gold pillar arrays on top of a dielectric waveguide. Opt Lett 2010, 35: 3408–3410. 10.1364/OL.35.003408View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang K, Crozier KB: Plasmonic trapping with a gold nanopillar. ChemPhysChem 2012, 13: 2639–2648. 10.1002/cphc.201200121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cetin AE, Yanik AA, Yilmaz C, Somu S, Busnaina A, Altug H: Monopole antenna arrays for optical trapping, spectroscopy, and sensing. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 111110. 10.1063/1.3559620View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kubo W, Fujikawa S: Au double nanopillars with nanogap for plasmonic sensor. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 8–15. 10.1021/nl100787bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kabashin AV, Evans P, Pastkovsky S, Hendren W, Wurtz GA, Atkinson R, Pollard R, Podolskiy VA, Zayats AV: Plasmonic nanorod metamaterials for biosensing. Nat Mater 2009, 8: 867–871. 10.1038/nmat2546View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Chigrin D, Lavrinenko A, Torres CS: Numerical characterization of nanopillar photonic crystal waveguides and directional couplers. Opt Quant Electron 2005, 37: 331–341. 10.1007/s11082-005-1189-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhao Y, Gan D, Cui J, Wang C, Du C, Luo X: Super resolution imaging by compensating oblique lens with metallodielectric films. Opt Express 2008, 16: 5697–5707. 10.1364/OE.16.005697View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Melville DOS, Blaikie RJ: Super-resolution imaging through a planar silver layer. Opt Express 2005, 13: 2127–2134. 10.1364/OPEX.13.002127View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Casse BDF, Lu WT, Huang YJ, Gultepe E, Menon L, Sridhar S: Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 023114. 10.1063/1.3291677View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cao T, Wang S: Topological insulator metamaterials with tunable negative refractive index in the optical region. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 526. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-526View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Cai W, Chettiar UK, Kildishev AV, Shalaev VM: Optical cloaking with metamaterials. Nat Photon 2007, 1: 224–227. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.28View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen H, Chan CT: Acoustic cloaking in three dimensions using acoustic metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 183518. 10.1063/1.2803315View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Xue J, Zhu Q, Liu J, Li Y, Zhou ZK, Lin Z, Yan J, Li J, Wang XH: Gold nanoarray deposited using alternating current for emission rate-manipulating nanoantenna. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013, 8: 295. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-295View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Aubry A, Lei DY, Fernández-Domínguez AI, Sonnefraud Y, Maier SA, Pendry JB: Plasmonic light-harvesting devices over the whole visible spectrum. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 2574–2579. 10.1021/nl101235dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Cole JR, Halas NJ: Optimized plasmonic nanoparticle distributions for solar spectrum harvesting. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89: 153120. 10.1063/1.2360918View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Si G, Zhao Y, Liu H, Teo S, Zhang M, Huang TJ, Danner AJ, Teng JH: Annular aperture array based color filter. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 99: 033105. 10.1063/1.3608147View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu YJ, Si GY, Leong ESP, Xiang N, Danner AJ, Teng JH: Light-driven plasmonic color filters by overlaying photoresponsive liquid crystals on gold annular aperture arrays. Adv Mater 2012, 24: OP131-OP135.Google Scholar
  24. Si G, Zhao Y, Lv J, Lu M, Wang F, Liu H, Xiang N, Huang TJ, Danner AJ, Teng J, Liu YJ: Reflective plasmonic color filters based on lithographically patterned silver nanorod arrays. Nanoscale 2013, 5: 6243–6248. 10.1039/c3nr01419cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Si G, Zhao Y, Leong ESP, Liu YJ: Liquid-crystal-enabled active plasmonics: a review. Materials 2014, 7: 1296–1317. 10.3390/ma7021296View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhao Y, Hao Q, Ma Y, Lu M, Zhang B, Lapsley M, Khoo IC, Huang TJ: Light-driven tunable dual-band plasmonic absorber using liquid-crystal-coated asymmetric nanodisk array. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 100: 053119. 10.1063/1.3681808View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang B, Zhao Y, Hao Q, Kiraly B, Khoo IC, Chen S, Huang TJ: Polarization independent dual-band infrared perfect absorber based on a metal-dielectric-metal elliptical nanodisk array. Opt Express 2011, 19: 15221–15228. 10.1364/OE.19.015221View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu N, Mesch M, Weiss T, Hentschel M, Giessen H: Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 2342–2348. 10.1021/nl9041033View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Fan Z, Kapadia R, Leu PW, Zhang X, Chueh YL, Takei K, Yu K, Jamshidi A, Rathore AA, Ruebusch DJ, Wu M, Javey A: Ordered arrays of dual-diameter nanopillars for maximized optical absorption. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 3823–3827. 10.1021/nl1010788View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Caldwell JD, Glembocki O, Bezares FJ, Bassim ND, Rendell RW, Feygelson M, Ukaegbu M, Kasica R, Shirey L, Hosten C: Plasmonic nanopillar arrays for large-area, high-enhancement surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensors. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 4046–4055. 10.1021/nn200636tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Senanayake P, Hung CH, Shapiro J, Scofield A, Lin A, Williams BS, Huffaker DL: 3D nanopillar optical antenna photodetectors. Opt Express 2012, 20: 25489–25496. 10.1364/OE.20.025489View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Caldwell JD, Glembocki O, Bezares FJ, Kariniemi MI, Niinisto JT, Hatanpaa TT, Rendell RW, Ukaegbu M, Ritala MK, Prokes SM, Hosten CM, Leskela MA, Kasica R: Large-area plasmonic hot-spot arrays: sub-2 nm interparticle separations with plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition of Ag on periodic arrays of Si nanopillars. Opt Express 2011, 19: 26056–26064. 10.1364/OE.19.026056View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsai SJ, Ballarotto M, Romero DB, Herman WN, Kan HC, Phaneuf RJ: Effect of gold nanopillar arrays on the absorption spectrum of a bulk heterojunction organic solar cell. Opt Express 2010, 18: A528-A535. 10.1364/OE.18.00A528View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin HY, Kuo Y, Liao CY, Yang CC, Kiang YW: Surface plasmon effects in the absorption enhancements of amorphous silicon solar cells with periodical metal nanowall and nanopillar structures. Opt Express 2012, 20: A104-A118. 10.1364/OE.20.00A104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zeng B, Gao Y, Bartoli FJ: Ultrathin nanostructured metals for highly transmissive plasmonic subtractive color filters. Sci Rep 2013, 3: 2840.Google Scholar
  36. Zeng B, Yang X, Wang C, Luo X: Plasmonic interference nanolithography with a double-layer planar silver lens structure. Opt Express 2009, 17: 16783–16791. 10.1364/OE.17.016783View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Zeng B, Gan Q, Kafafi ZH, Bartoli FJ: Polymeric photovoltaics with various metallic plasmonic nanostructures. J Appl Phys 2013, 113: 063109. 10.1063/1.4790504View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zeng B, Yang X, Wang C, Feng Q, Luo X: Super-resolution imaging at different wavelengths by using a one-dimensional metamaterial structure. J Opt 2010, 12: 035104. 10.1088/2040-8978/12/3/035104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Gao Y, Xin Z, Zeng B, Gan Q, Cheng X, Bartoli FJ: Plasmonic interferometric sensor arrays for high-performance label-free biomolecular detection. Lab Chip 2013, 13: 4755–4764. 10.1039/c3lc50863cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu T, Fang L, Zeng B, Liu Y, Wang C, Feng Q, Luo X: Subwavelength nanolithography based on unidirectional excitation of surface plasmons. J Opt A Pure Appl Opt 2009, 11: 085003. 10.1088/1464-4258/11/8/085003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Drezet A, Koller D, Hohenau A, Leitner A, Aussenegg FR, Krenn JR: Plasmonic crystal demultiplexer and multiports. Nano Lett 2007, 7: 1697–1700. 10.1021/nl070682pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson PB, Christy RW: Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys Rev B 1972, 6: 4370–4379. 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Si et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.