A rugate filter based on nanoporous anodic alumina was fabricated using an innovative sinusoidal current profile with small current variation. The resulting structure consisted of highly parallel pores with modulations of the pore diameter along the pore axis and with no branching. The effect of the period time and the pore widening post-treatment was studied. From reflectance measurements, it was seen that the position of the reflection band can be tuned by adjusting the period time and the width by pore-widening post-treatments. We tested one of the rugate filters by infiltrating the structure with EtOH and water in order to evaluate its sensing capabilities. This method allows the fabrication of complex in-depth modulated nanoporous anodic alumina structures that open up the possibility of new kinds of alumina-based optical sensing devices.
Rugate filters are one-dimensional photonic crystals based on a smooth variation of the refractive index along the depth of the structure which results in a photonic bandgap (PBG) . Unlike distributed Bragg reflectors (DBR), rugate filters display a single reflectivity band without harmonics or sidelobes. Thanks to this feature, rugate filters with complex optical response and multiple PBG can be fabricated by superimposing multiple refractive index profiles [1–3]. However, these filters are difficult to fabricate because the smooth variation of the refractive index is challenging and requires complex equipment. An interesting method for fabricating rugate filters is by means of electrochemically etched materials such as porous silicon (pSi). In porous materials, the refractive index depends on the porosity of the layer. Thus, pSi rugate filters have been fabricated thanks to the ease of porosity modulation by adjusting the electrochemical etching conditions [4–6]. Thanks to the porous nature of the resulting pSi rugate filters, these optical devices have been exploited for the development of highly sensitive detectors [7–12].
Another interesting material for the development of highly sensitive optical sensors is nanoporous anodic alumina (NAA) [13–21]. NAA is a nanostructured material obtained from the electrochemical etching of high-purity aluminum foils that has attracted much interest in recent years thanks to its unique structural properties. NAA consists of highly uniform and parallel pores with no branching. The interpore distance can be easily tuned by adjusting the voltage applied during the electrochemical etching, and the pore diameter can be adjusted by wet chemical etching in phosphoric acid . Moreover, honeycomb structures of self-ordered pores can be obtained by the two-step anodization procedure . However, porosity modulation with NAA has been challenging.
One of the first techniques used for pore modulation during the anodization was pulse anodization [24–26]. This technique consisted in combining mild and hard anodization regimes by means of step voltage variations. This allowed great changes in the pore diameter along the pore axis, but despite the fact that no optical characterization was performed, the combination of mild and hard anodization regimes would result in abrupt refractive index variations which are incompatible with the development of rugate filters. Another technique is cyclic anodization. This method was used to fabricate DBRs by applying a periodic voltage which resulted in well-defined layers with branched pores [27–29]. Lately, NAA photonic crystals fabricated with current control techniques have been reported [30, 31]. However, these structures also showed branched pores.
In this work, we report a current control technique for the fabrication of NAA rugate filters. We have characterized the resulting structure and analyzed its optical response as a function of porosity by applying subsequent pore-widening processes. Finally, we tested the sensing capabilities of the NAA rugate filters by real-time monitoring the shift of the central wavelength in ethanol and deionized water.
Aluminum (Al) foil (thickness = 250 μm, purity = 99.999%) was purchased from Goodfellow (Huntingdon, UK). Oxalic acid (H2C2O4), ethanol (C2H5OH), acetone ((CH3)2CO), perchloric acid (HClO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and copper chloride (CuCl) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). Double deionized (DI) water (18.6 MΩ, Purelab Option-Q, Elga, Marlow, UK) was used for all the solutions unless otherwise specified.
Al substrates were first degreased in acetone and further cleaned with ethanol (EtOH) and DI water and dried under a stream of air. Prior to anodization, Al substrates were electropolished in a mixture of EtOH and perchloric acid (HClO4) 4:1 (v/v) at 20 V and 5°C for 4 min. During the electropolishing procedure, the stirring direction was alternated every 60 s. Then, the electropolished Al substrates were cleaned in EtOH and DI water and dried under a stream of air. Subsequently, the anodization of the aluminum in H2C2O4 0.3 M at 5°C was carried out by applying an apodized current profile consisting of a DC component of 2.05 mA cm−2 with a superimposed alternating current (AC) sinusoidal component with variable amplitude. The amplitude of this AC component was modulated with a half-wave sinus profile with 1.45 mA cm−2 of maximum amplitude (see Figure 1a). We investigated the influence of the period (T) of the sinusoidal component on the optical characteristics of the obtained structures. Afterwards, different pore-widening post-treatments in H3PO4 5% wt. at 35°C were performed for tpw = 0, 5, 10, and 15 min in order to study the effect of porosity on the characteristics of the reflectance bands of the NAA rugate filters. Finally, Al bulk was selectively dissolved using a HCl/CuCl-saturated solution.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs used for structural characterization of the NAA rugate filters were taken on SEM FEI Quanta 600 (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The optical characterization of the rugate filters was performed on a PerkinElmer UV/vis/NIR Lambda 950 spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). For the reflectance measurements, the spectrophotometer was coupled with the universal reflectance accessory (URA).
Real-time measurements for the sensing experiments were performed in a custom-made flow cell. Reflectance spectra of the NAA rugate filter were obtained using a halogen light source and a CCD spectrometer (Avantes, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands). Light was directed to the surface at a normal angle through a fiber optic cable consisting of six illuminating waveguides and one reading waveguide coupled to an optical lens which focused the light on top of the NAA rugate filter. The light reflected by the rugate filter sample was collected by the reading waveguide and directed to the CCD spectrometer, which recorded a spectrum every 10 s.
Results and discussion
Figure 1a shows the characteristic current and voltage evolution with time during the fabrication of NAA rugate filters. In this approach, we performed an apodization of the current profile in order to minimize the sidelobes in the reflectance spectra. Figure 1b shows a magnification of the area with the maximum current amplitude. We observed how the current density profile used throughout the experiments resulted in an initial transitory voltage (Figure 1a), which corresponds to the growth of the NAA barrier layer at the bottom of the pores, followed by an apodized sinusoidal voltage profile oscillating between 37 and 48 V with an average value of 41 V that resembles the applied current profile. A closer look at the electrochemical fabrication curves reveals a delay of the voltage with respect to the current. The resulting nanostructure is shown in Figure 2. The results presented here are for disordered porous alumina (Figure 2). Nevertheless, the narrow voltage range measured during our experiments would allow the fabrication of self-ordered rugate filters. The analysis of the cross-sectional micrograph of the NAA rugate filter reveals pore modulation without branching along the pore axis. This is due to the varying current profile (Figure 2) which produced a porosity gradient and, thus, a varying refractive index in depth.
Central wavelength calibration
In order to calibrate the position of the reflectance band, we fabricated three sets of samples with periods of T = 200, 250, and 300 s (Figure 3a). By increasing the period time, we increased the period of the pore diameter variations and, thus, tuned the position of the reflectance band. Another option would be to shift the current to higher values. However, we discarded this solution because of the higher potentials achieved which were beyond the self-ordering regime. As depicted in Figure 3b, shifting the period time allows linear tuning of the reflectance band at a rate of 2.4 nm s−1. Furthermore, the spectra show how longer periods result in wider bands.
Effect of porosity
In order to assess the effect of porosity on the NAA rugate filter, we fabricated four sets of samples with a period of T = 200 s and applied a pore-widening post-treatment for 0, 5, 10, and 15 min. The remaining Al was selectively dissolved to ensure that the reflection observed was only due to the rugate structure. Figure 4a shows the resulting reflectance spectra. The spectra displayed a well-defined band without sidelobes as we expected from the apodization of the current profile. We observed that the pore-widening treatment resulted in a blueshift of the reflection band as well as a lower reflection below and above the band. This is the result of the partial dissolution of the alumina, which decreases the overall refractive index of the rugate filter. A more interesting fact is how the band widened after the pore-widening treatment. This broadening is related to the refractive index contrast of the rugate filter (Δn). The higher the Δn, the wider the band. This is in good agreement with our previous reported results for NAA obtained with periodic anodization voltages [7, 14]. Analysis of the transmittance measurements (Figure 4b) showed how the pore-widening post-treatment led to less steep edges in the stop band, possibly due to scattering and absorption of the alumina.
As a proof of the possible application of this structure, we performed a sensing experiment in a flow cell and monitored the position of the reflectance band in real-time for a sample fabricated with a period time of T = 200 s, a total of 300 cycles, and a pore-widening post-treatment of tpw = 5 min (Figure 5). After acquiring a reference of the sample in air, we flowed EtOH at a rate of 1 mL min−1. Then, we flowed deionized water and, finally, EtOH again in order to prove the repeatability of the measurement. The results presented in Figure 5 show a highly stable signal with no significant drift within the time range and a very low noise of about 0.04 nm. The NAA rugate filter was able to distinguish between two liquids with a similar refractive index (nwater = 1.333, nEtOH = 1.362) with a sensitivity of 48.8 nm/refractive index unit (RIU). Moreover, when EtOH was reintroduced into the chamber, the position of the reflection band returned to the same value of the first EtOH infiltration, indicating the high reproducibility of the results.
NAA rugate filters were fabricated using a current control method based on a sinusoidal current profile with a maximum amplitude of just 1.45 mA cm−2. Thanks to this small current peak-to-peak value, the voltage was contained within 40 ± 5 V. The position of the band can be accurately tuned by varying the period time of the current profile. This process allows the fabrication of highly reflective bands with just 50 periods. Moreover, for as-produced rugate filters, the reflectance bands were narrow (less than 30 nm) which is an important feature for the development of highly sensitive chemical and biochemical sensors based on the monitorization of the position of the reflectance band. As a proof of concept, we performed a sensing experiment in a flow cell in order to determine the sensing possibilities of the structure and found out that changes in refractive index of 0.031 can be readily monitored with high sensitivity (48.8 nm/RIU) and low noise level (<0.04 nm).
distributed Bragg reflector
nanoporous anodic alumina
photonic band gap
refractive index unit.
This research was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad through the grant number TEC2012-34397 and the Generalitat de Catalunya through the grant number 2014-SGR-1344.
Department of Electronic, Electric and Automatics Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Southwell WH: Spectral response calculations of rugate filters using coupled-wave theory. JOSA A 1988, 5: 1558–1564. 10.1364/JOSAA.5.001558View Article
Southwell WH: Using apodization functions to reduce sidelobes in rugate filters. Appl Opt 1989, 28: 5091–5094. 10.1364/AO.28.005091View Article
Berger MG, Arens-Fischer R, Thönissen M, Krüger M, Billat S, Lüth H, Hilbrich S, Theiss W, Grosse P: Dielectric filters made of PS: advanced performance by oxidation and new layer structures. Thin Solid Films 1997, 297: 237–240. 10.1016/S0040-6090(96)09361-3View Article
Lorenzo E, Oton CJ, Capuj NE, Ghulinyan M, Navarro-Urrios D, Gaburro Z, Pavesi L: Porous silicon-based rugate filters. Appl Opt 2005, 44: 5415–5421. 10.1364/AO.44.005415View Article
Jalkanen T, Torres-Costa V, Mäkilä E, Kaasalainen M, Koda R, Sakka T, Ogata YH, Salonen J: Selective optical response of hydrolytically stable stratified Si rugate mirrors to liquid infiltration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2014, 6: 2884–2892. 10.1021/am405436dView Article
Orosco MM, Pacholski C, Miskelly M, Sailor MJ: Protein-coated porous silicon photonic crystals for amplified optical detection of protease activity. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 1393–1396. 10.1002/adma.200502420View Article
Pacholski C, Sailor MJ: Sensing with porous silicon double layers: a general approach for background suppression. Phys Stat Sol C 2007, 4: 2088–2092. 10.1002/pssc.200674381View Article
Salem MS, Sailor MJ, Fukami K, Sakka T, Ogata YH: Sensitivity of porous silicon rugate filters for chemical vapour detection. J Appl Phys 2008, 103: 083516–083517. 10.1063/1.2906337View Article
Ruminski AM, King BH, Salonen J, Snyder JL, Sailor MJ: Porous silicon-based optical microsensors for volatile organic analytes: effect of surface chemistry on stability and specificity. Adv Funct Mater 2010, 20: 2874–2883. 10.1002/adfm.201000575View Article
Kelly TL, Gao T, Sailor MJ: Carbon and carbon/silicon composites templated in rugate filters for the adsorption and detection of organic vapors. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 1776–1781. 10.1002/adma.201004142View Article
Li S, Hu D, Huang J, Cai L: Optical sensing nanostructures for porous silicon rugate filters. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 79. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-79View Article
Pan S, Rothberg LJ: Interferometric sensing of biomolecular binding using nanoporous aluminium oxide templates. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 811–814. 10.1021/nl034055lView Article
Kim D-K, Kerman K, Hiep HM, Saito M, Yamamura S, Takamura Y, Kwon Y-S, Tamiya E: Label-free optical detection of aptamer-protein interactions using gold-capped oxide nanostructures. Anal Biochem 2008, 379: 1–7. 10.1016/j.ab.2008.04.029View Article
Kumeria T, Santos A, Losic D: Ultrasensitive nanoporous interferometric sensor for label-free detection of gold (III) ions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013, 5: 11783–11790. 10.1021/am403465xView Article
Kumeria T, Rahman MM, Santos A, Ferré-Borrull J, Marsal LF, Lasic D: Structural and optical nanoengineering of nanoporous anodic alumina rugate filters for real-time and label-free biosensing applications. Anal Chem 2014, 86: 1837–1844. 10.1021/ac500069fView Article
Rahman MM, Garcia-Caurel E, Santos A, Marsal LF, Pallarès J, Ferré-Borrull J: Effect of the anodization voltage on the pore widening rate of nanoporous anodic alumina. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 474. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-474View Article
Masuda H, Fukuda K: Ordered metal nanohole arrays made by a two-step replication of honeycomb structures of anodic alumina. Science 1995, 268: 1466–1468. 10.1126/science.268.5216.1466View Article
Lee W, Ji R, Gösele U, Nielsch K: Fast fabrication of long-range porous alumina membranes by hard anodization. Nat Mater 2006, 5: 741–747. 10.1038/nmat1717View Article
Lee W, Kim J-C: Highly ordered porous alumina with tailor-made pore structures fabricated by pulse anodization. Nanotechnology 2010, 21: 485304. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/48/485304View Article
Santos A, Vojkuvka L, Alba M, Valderrama VS, Ferré-Borrull J, Pallarès J, Marsal LF: Understanding and morphology control of pore modulations in nanoporous anodic alumina by discontinuous anodization. Phys Status Solidi A 2012, 209: 2045–2048. 10.1002/pssa.201228150View Article
Zheng WJ, Fei GT, Wang B, Jin Z, Zhang LD: Distributed Bragg reflector made of anodic alumina membrane. Mater Lett 2009, 63: 706–708. 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.12.019View Article
Su Y, Fei GT, Zhang Y, Yan P, Li H, Shang GL, Zhang LD: Controllable preparation of the ordered pore arrays anodic alumina with high-quality photonic band gaps. Mater Lett 2011, 65: 2693–2695. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.05.112View Article
Rahman MM, Marsal LF, Pallarès J, Ferré-Borrull J: Tuning the photonic stop bands of nanoporous anodic alumina-based distributed Bragg reflectors by pore widening. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013, 5: 13375–13381. 10.1021/am4043118View Article
Yisen L, Yi C, Zhiyuan L, Xing H, Yi L: Structural coloring of aluminium. Electrochem Commun 2011, 13: 1336–1339. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.08.008View Article
Yan P, Fei GT, Shang GL, Wu B, Zhang LD: Fabrication of one-dimensional alumina photonic crystals with a narrow band gap and their application to high-sensitivity sensors. J Mater Chem C 2013, 1: 1659–1664.View Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.