Open Access

Low-temperature growth of highly crystalline β-Ga2O3 nanowires by solid-source chemical vapor deposition

  • Ning Han1, 3,
  • Fengyun Wang2,
  • Zaixing Yang1, 3,
  • SenPo Yip1, 3,
  • Guofa Dong1,
  • Hao Lin1, 3,
  • Ming Fang1,
  • TakFu Hung1 and
  • Johnny C Ho1, 3Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20149:347

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-347

Received: 30 May 2014

Accepted: 29 June 2014

Published: 10 July 2014


Growing Ga2O3 dielectric materials at a moderately low temperature is important for the further development of high-mobility III-V semiconductor-based nanoelectronics. Here, β-Ga2O3 nanowires are successfully synthesized at a relatively low temperature of 610°C by solid-source chemical vapor deposition employing GaAs powders as the source material, which is in a distinct contrast to the typical synthesis temperature of above 1,000°C as reported by other methods. In this work, the prepared β-Ga2O3 nanowires are mainly composed of Ga and O elements with an atomic ratio of approximately 2:3. Importantly, they are highly crystalline in the monoclinic structure with varied growth orientations in low-index planes. The bandgap of the β-Ga2O3 nanowires is determined to be 251 nm (approximately 4.94 eV), in good accordance with the literature. Also, electrical characterization reveals that the individual nanowire has a resistivity of up to 8.5 × 107 Ω cm, when fabricated in the configuration of parallel arrays, further indicating the promise of growing these highly insulating Ga2O3 materials in this III-V nanowire-compatible growth condition.


77.55.D; 61.46.Km; 78.40.Fy


β-Ga2O3 nanowires Chemical vapor deposition Solid-source Highly crystalline Large resistance Dielectric


In the past decade, gallium oxide (Ga2O3), as a large-bandgap (approximately 4.9 eV) semiconductor, has attracted extensive attention in the area of insulating oxides for the metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) technology as well as the active materials for the solar-blind deep ultraviolet detectors [16]. In particular, when high-mobility III-V compound semiconductor nanomaterials, such as GaAs, InAs, GaSb, and InSb nanowires (NWs), have been successfully illustrated with their great technological potentials in next-generation electronics [79], Ga2O3-based gate dielectrics are of significant importance to be achieved and to outperform the conventional silicon technology, due to their excellent stability and relatively high dielectric constant (approximately 14.2) as compared to that of SiO2 (approximately 3.9) or even the typically used high-κ Al2O3 (approximately 8) [1, 10].

Till now, there are several effective integrations of Ga2O3-based gate dielectrics demonstrated in thin-film III-V field-effect transistors (FETs). For instance, Ga2O3 and Ga2O3/Gd2O3 composite materials have been shown to be excellent gate dielectrics for GaAs, In x Ga1 − xAs, and GaN thin-film transistors with the low interface state density and high breakdown field strength [2, 3, 7, 11]. However, there are still very few studies focused on Ga2O3 dielectrics prepared directly on III-V NWs since the typical thermal oxidizing method is challenging to be executed on the small-diameter NWs, while the atomic-layer-deposited (ALD) high-κ HfO2 and Al2O3 dielectrics often have significant interfacial defects when performed on NW materials [12]. In this case, it is necessary to explore other alternative dielectrics such as Ga2O3 achieved by other advanced techniques in order to tackle this issue for the versatile high-mobility III-V NW devices.

Among many Ga2O3 phases, the monoclinic β-Ga2O3 is the most stable phase, being a promising gate dielectric alternative; nevertheless, it often requires synthesis at high temperatures to maintain its excellent crystallinity. For example, β-Ga2O3 NWs are usually prepared at above 1,000°C, employing Ga metal as the source in the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [13], and sometimes even high-energy arc plasma is utilized when using GaN as the starting material [14]. As most III-V NWs are synthesized at a moderate temperature in the range 400°C to 600°C via vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) and/or vapor-solid-solid (VSS) mechanisms [1518], a compatible low-temperature β-Ga2O3 growth technique is therefore essential to grow dielectrics laterally on III-V NWs while not degrading the III-V NW materials with high vapor pressures.

Recently, we have adopted various III-V material powders as precursor sources for the NW growth by CVD, such as obtaining GaAs, InP, GaSb, etc. at a temperature of 500°C to 600°C [1921]. Here, in this report, we perform detailed studies on the synthesis behaviors and fundamental physical properties of β-Ga2O3 NWs at this moderate growth temperature in a similar CVD growth system. It is revealed that highly crystalline and insulating β-Ga2O3 NWs are successfully grown on the amorphous SiO2 substrate, which provides a preliminary understanding of the β-Ga2O3 NWs attained by the solid-source CVD method, and further enables us to manipulate the process parameters to achieve high-quality gate dielectrics laterally grown on III-V semiconductor NWs for the coaxially gated NW device structures [22].


Synthesis of Ga2O3 NWs

The Ga2O3 NWs were synthesized in a dual-zone horizontal tube furnace, where the upstream zone was used for evaporating the solid source and the downstream zone for the NW growth, as reported previously [15]. At first, 50-nm Au colloids (standard deviation of approximately 5 nm, NanoSeedz, Hong Kong) were drop-casted on SiO2/Si substrates (50-nm thermally grown oxide) to serve as the catalyst, which were then placed in the middle of the downstream zone with a tilt angle of approximately 20°. The solid source, GaAs powders (approximately 1.0 g), was contained in a boron nitride crucible, which was then positioned in the upstream zone with a distance of approximately 10 cm away from the substrate with catalysts. During the NW growth, the substrate was initially heated to the preset growth temperature (580°C to 620°C) and the source was then heated to the required source temperature (900°C). Mixture of argon (Ar, 99.9995% purity, 100 sccm) and oxygen (O2, 99.9995% purity) in different flow ratios (100:1 to 100:100) was used as the carrier gas to transport the thermally vaporized precursors to the downstream. After the growth of 1 h, the source and substrate heater were stopped together and cooled down to room temperature under the Ar and O2 flow.

Characterization of Ga2O3 NWs

Surface morphologies of the grown Ga2O3 NWs were examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM; FEI/Philips XL30, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and transmission electron microscope (TEM; Philips CM-20, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Crystal structures were determined by collecting X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns on a Philips powder diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) and by selected area electron diffraction (SAED; Philips CM-20). Elemental analysis was performed using an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDS) detector attached to JEOL CM-20 (Akishima-shi, Japan) to measure the chemical composition of the grown NWs. For the TEM and EDS analyses, the Ga2O3 NWs were first suspended in an ethanol solution by ultrasonication and drop-casted onto a copper grid for the corresponding characterization. The reflectance spectrum was measured with a LAMBDA 750 spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at room temperature.

The Ga2O3 NW arrays were fabricated by contact printing on SiO2/Si substrates (50-nm thermally grown oxide) as reported previously [23]. Typically, a pre-patterned SiO2/Si substrate coated with a photoresist was used as the receiver, while the donor NW chip was flipped onto the receiver and slid at a rate of 10 mm/min with a pressure of 50 g/cm2. After photoresist removal, the Ga2O3 NW arrays were left on the patterned region. Then, photolithography was utilized to define the electrode regions, and a 100-nm-thick Ni film was thermally deposited as the contact electrode followed by a lift-off process. The electrical performance of the fabricated NW arrays was characterized with a standard electrical probe station and Agilent 4155C semiconductor analyzer (Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Results and discussion

As reported previously, we synthesized GaAs NWs by the solid-source CVD method using GaAs powders as the source material heated at 900°C and 100-sccm H2 as the carrier gas, catalyzed by Au nanoparticles at 580°C to 620°C [15, 24]. In an attempt to prepare Ga2O3 in a compatible circumstance, we employ the same conditions here except the H2 carrier gas, which is substituted by a mixture of Ar and O2 in order to introduce oxygen into the growth environment. The flow rate of Ar is fixed at 100 sccm, and the ratio of Ar and O2 is precisely tailored as 100:1, 100:2, 100:10, and 100:100 by using mass flow controllers (the pressure is approximately 0.8, approximately 0.8, approximately 0.9, and approximately 1.4 Torr, respectively). The corresponding obtained NW products appeared whitish on the substrate, in contrast with the yellowish-green GaAs NWs. The NWs are then observed by SEM as shown in Figure 1a,b,c,d. It is clear that the NWs grown at the Ar:O2 flow ratio of 100:2 are relatively long and smooth on the surface (Figure 1b), while the lower O2 flow induces a significant coating problem (Figure 1a) and the higher O2 flow suppresses the NW growth (Figure 1c,d). The high O2 flow might deactivate the Au catalyst leading to no NW growth, while the low O2 flow might not make the Ga2O3 NW nucleation sufficient over the GaAs NW growth but only overcoat on the GaAs NW surface resulting in the overcoating problem. Notably, in our former study of GaAs NWs, the GaAs powder source has depleted less than 0.1 g of weight after the growth, whereas the source has now depleted more than 0.5 g of weight in this Ga2O3 NW growth by introducing a small amount of oxygen. This would be attributed to the fact that even though Ga has a decently high vapor pressure, there is still a small amount of Ga being evaporated and transported in the H2 atmosphere in the GaAs NW growth. On the other hand, when O2 is introduced in the Ga2O3 NW growth, Ga is easily oxidized to Ga2O [25], which has a far higher vapor pressure than that of metallic Ga, and thus can be massively evaporated and transported by the carrier gas to the substrate; as a result, a proper control in the amount of O2 feed is critical for the effective NW growth here.
Figure 1

SEM images of the Ga 2 O 3 NWs grown at different Ar:O 2 flow ratios. Source temperature at 900°C, substrate temperature at 610°C, Ar flow of 100 sccm. (a) 100:1. (b) 100:2. (c) 100:10. (d) 100:100.

The NWs grown at the Ar:O2 flow ratio of 100:2 are then observed by TEM as depicted in Figure 2a, which further confirms the straight NWs with smooth surfaces. Furthermore, the elemental composition is analyzed by EDS, and the typical spectrum is illustrated in Figure 2b, which clearly demonstrates that the NWs are mainly composed of Ga and O with an atomic ratio of approximately 2:3. These results evidently show that the obtained NWs here are Ga2O3 instead of the GaAs NWs grown in the H2 atmosphere. It should also be noted that although As-doped In2O3 NWs were prepared in a similar system when utilizing InAs powders as the source material and As is detected in the EDS spectrum [26], no As-related signal is obtained within the detection limit of EDS performed in this study. This difference may be due to the alteration in the synthesis condition that H2 is intentionally introduced into the Ar/O2 carrier gas to suppress the oxide growth in [25], which can be ruled out in this Ga2O3 NW growth. It is plausible that since oxygen has a far higher electron negativity (approximately 3.44) than arsenic (approximately 2.18) and that Ga2O3 has a far lower Gibbs free energy (approximately −998.3 kJ/mol) than GaAs (−67.8 kJ/mol) [27], in this case, Ga2O3 is more preferentially grown from the thermal dynamics point of view. In other words, when H2 in introduced, Ga2O3 growth would be deterred and get substituted by the GaAs growth [25].
Figure 2

Morphology and elemental analysis of the β-Ga 2 O 3 NWs grown at the Ar:O 2 flow ratio of 100:2. (a) TEM image. (b) EDS spectrum.

In order to investigate the crystal structure of the obtained Ga2O3 NWs, the XRD pattern is attained for NWs readily grown on the SiO2/Si substrate as presented in Figure 3a. It is obvious that the NWs are grown in the monoclinic structure (β-phase) in accordance with the standard card PDF 011-0370. Then, the crystal structure and growth orientation of individual NWs are further studied by using SAED as shown in Figure 3b,c,d. All these indicate that the representative NWs all existed in the monoclinic crystal structure, which is in good agreement with the XRD results. Even though the orientations are observed to vary from NW to NW, typically low-index directions such as [100], 1 ¯ 11 , and 2 ¯ 13 are perceived, which might have resulted from the similar surface energies of these crystal planes, especially for materials in the nanometer size with the examples reported in Si NWs [28], GaAs NWs [15], ZnSe NWs [29], etc.
Figure 3

Structural and orientation analysis of the β-Ga 2 O 3 NWs grown at the Ar:O 2 flow ratio of 100:2. (a) XRD pattern. (b, c, d) TEM images and the corresponding SAED patterns (insets).

The bandgap of β-Ga2O3 NWs can also be determined by the reflectance spectrum as depicted in Figure 4. It clearly shows that the absorption edge lies at approximately 251 nm (4.94 eV). This bandgap value is in good agreement with that of β-Ga2O3 NWs reported in the literature (approximately 254 nm) [30] while a bit higher than that of bulk materials (approximately 270 nm) [31]. A relatively larger bandgap of nanomaterials is often observed than their bulk counterparts, which is usually attributed to the quantum confinement effect of nanomaterials, inducing a blueshift of the bandgap [32].
Figure 4

Reflectance spectrum of the β-Ga 2 O 3 NWs grown at the Ar:O 2 flow ratio of 100:2.

To shed light on exploring the electronic properties of achieved β-Ga2O3 NWs, the resistance of NWs is first assessed by defining electrodes by standard photolithography. It should be noted that when defining Ni electrodes on a single β-Ga2O3 NW, no significant current can be obtained as compared with the resolution (approximately 1 pA) of our semiconductor analyzer and probe station. In order to enlarge the current signal to a measurable level, the β-Ga2O3 NWs are then aligned into parallel arrays by the contact printing technique as reported previously [8, 23]. Ni electrodes (with the work function of approximately 5.1 eV) are then defined on both ends of the NW arrays, given in the SEM image in Figure 5a. The NW density is approximately 1 NW/μm, accounting for approximately 200 NWs in the 200 μm (width) × 3.7 μm (length) channel area. In this way, the current-voltage (I-V) curve of the representative β-Ga2O3 NW array is measured and shown in Figure 5b, where the resistance is estimated to be approximately 2 × 1012 Ω as the current is approximately 5 pA under 10-V bias. As a result, the resistance is approximately 4 × 1014 Ω per individual NW (approximately 2 × 1012 × 200 Ω, as 200 NWs are connected in parallel). Then, the resistivity can be estimated as 2 × 1012 × 200 Ω × 3.7 μm/3.14/502 nm2 = 8.5 × 107 Ω cm, considering the NW diameter of approximately 100 nm. Notably, other metal electrodes with different work functions such as Al (approximately 4.2 eV) and Au (approximately 5.3 eV) are also prepared, in which the results attained are all similar as shown in Figure 5b, suggesting the highly insulating property of the NWs here. This resistivity is relatively larger than those of doped and undoped β-Ga2O3 NWs reported in the literature [4, 6, 13], which can be attributed to the moderate growth temperature employed in this work such that less impurity would be incorporated, showing its prospective in dielectric materials for advanced III-V nanowire-based nanoelectronics.
Figure 5

Electrical properties of the β-Ga 2 O 3 NWs grown at the Ar:O 2 flow ratio of 100:2. (a) SEM image of the printed β-Ga2O3 NW arrays patterned with Ni electrodes on both ends. (b) The corresponding I-V curve of the β-Ga2O3 NW arrays with Ni, Al, and Au as electrodes.


Highly crystalline β-Ga2O3 NWs are synthesized by a solid-source chemical vapor deposition method employing GaAs powders as the source material and mixture of Ar and O2 as the carrier gas. The NWs grown at the Ar:O2 flow ratio of 100:2 are long (>10 μm) with a uniform diameter of approximately 100 nm and smooth surfaces. X-ray diffraction and selected area electron diffraction results confirm the monoclinic structure of the obtained NWs with varied growth orientations along the low-index planes. Furthermore, the reflectance spectrum demonstrates the bandgap of β-Ga2O3 NWs being 4.94 eV, while the electrical measurement deduces the corresponding resistivity of 8.5 × 107 Ω cm. All these results indicate the successful synthesis of a large-bandgap Ga2O3 material in III-V-compatible growth conditions, illustrating the promising potential for dielectric materials used for III-V nanowire-based metal-oxide-semiconductor technology.



This research was financially supported by the Early Career Scheme of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR, China (Grant Number CityU139413), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 51202205), the Guangdong National Science Foundation (Grant Number S2012010010725), and the Science Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality (Grant Number JCYJ20120618140624228) and was supported by a grant from the Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physics and Materials Science, City University of Hong Kong
Cultivation Base for State Key Laboratory, Qingdao University
Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong


  1. Lin TD, Chiu HC, Chang P, Tung LT, Chen CP, Hong M, Kwo J, Tsai W, Wang YC: High-performance self-aligned inversion-channel In0.53Ga0.47As metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect-transistor with Al2O3/Ga2O3(Gd2O3) as gate dielectrics. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 033516. 10.1063/1.2956393View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Paterson GW, Wilson JA, Moran D, Hill R, Long AR, Thayne I, Passlack M, Droopad R: Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) on gallium arsenide - a low defect, high-K system for future devices. Mat Sci Eng B-Solid 2006, 135: 277–281. 10.1016/j.mseb.2006.08.026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ren F, Kuo JM, Hong M, Hobson WS, Lothian JR, Lin J, Tsai HS, Mannaerts JP, Kwo J, Chu SNG, Chen YK, Cho AK: Ga2O3(Gd2O3)/InGaAs enhancement-mode n-channel MOSFETs. IEEE Electr Device L 1998, 19: 309–311.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Oshima T, Okuno T, Arai N, Suzuki N, Ohira S, Fujita S: Vertical solar-blind deep-ultraviolet Schottky photodetectors based on β-Ga2O3 substrates. Appl Phys Express 2008, 1: 011202. 10.1143/APEX.1.011202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Weng WY, Hsueh TJ, Chang SJ, Huang GJ, Hung SC: Growth of Ga2O3 nanowires and the fabrication of solar-blind photodetector. IEEE T Nanotechnol 2011, 10: 1047–1052.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Feng P, Zhang JY, Li QH, Wang TH: Individual β-Ga2O3 nanowires as solar-blind photodetectors. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 153107. 10.1063/1.2193463View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Passlack M, Droopad R, Rajagopalan K, Abrokwah J, Zurcher P, Fejes P: High mobility III-V MOSFET technology. In CSIC 2006, IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium: November 2006. San Antonio: IEEE; 2006:39–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Han N, Wang FY, Hou JJ, Yip SP, Lin H, Xiu F, Fang M, Yang ZX, Shi XL, Dong GF, Hung TF, Ho JC: Tunable electronic transport properties of metal-cluster-decorated III-V nanowire transistors. Adv Mater 2013, 25: 4445–4451. 10.1002/adma.201301362View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chueh Y-L, Ford AC, Ho JC, Jacobson ZA, Fan Z, Chen C-Y, Chou L-J, Javey A: Formation and characterization of NixInAs/InAs nanowire heterostructures by solid source reaction. Nano Letters 2008, 8: 4528–4533. 10.1021/nl802681xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Robertson J: High dielectric constant gate oxides for metal oxide Si transistors. Rep Prog Phys 2006, 69: 327–396. 10.1088/0034-4885/69/2/R02View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim H, Park SJ, Hwang HS: Thermally oxidized GaN film for use as gate insulators. J Vac Sci Technol B 2001, 19: 579–581. 10.1116/1.1349733View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. del Alamo JA: Nanometre-scale electronics with III-V compound semiconductors. Nature 2011, 479: 317–323. 10.1038/nature10677View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang PC, Fan ZY, Tseng WY, Rajagopal A, Lu JG: β-Ga2O3 nanowires: synthesis, characterization, and p-channel field-effect transistor. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87: 222102. 10.1063/1.2135867View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Choi YC, Kim WS, Park YS, Lee SM, Bae DJ, Lee YH, Park GS, Choi WB, Lee NS, Kim JM: Catalytic growth of β-Ga2O3 nanowires by arc discharge. Adv Mater 2000, 12: 746–750. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:10<746::AID-ADMA746>3.0.CO;2-NView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Han N, Wang F, Hou JJ, Yip S, Lin H, Fang M, Xiu F, Shi X, Hung T, Ho JC: Manipulated growth of GaAs nanowires: controllable crystal quality and growth orientations via a supersaturation-controlled engineering process. Cryst Growth Des 2012, 12: 6243–6249. 10.1021/cg301452dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Persson AI, Larsson MW, Stenstrom S, Ohlsson BJ, Samuelson L, Wallenberg LR: Solid-phase diffusion mechanism for GaAs nanowire growth. Nat Mater 2004, 3: 677–681. 10.1038/nmat1220View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hou JJ, Han N, Wang F, Xiu F, Yip S, Hui AT, Hung T, Ho JC: Synthesis and characterizations of ternary InGaAs nanowires by a two-step growth method for high-performance electronic devices. ACS Nano 2012, 6: 3624–3630. 10.1021/nn300966jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang ZX, Han N, Wang FY, Cheung HY, Shi XL, Yip S, Hung T, Lee MH, Wong CY, Ho JC: Carbon doping of InSb nanowires for high-performance p-channel field-effect-transistors. Nanoscale 2013, 5: 9671–9676. 10.1039/c3nr03080fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Han N, Hou JJ, Wang FY, Yip S, Yen YT, Yang ZX, Dong GF, Hung T, Chueh YL, Ho JC: GaAs nanowires: from manipulation of defect formation to controllable electronic transport properties. ACS Nano 2013, 7: 9138–9146. 10.1021/nn403767jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hui AT, Wang F, Han N, Yip SP, Xiu F, Hou JJ, Yen YT, Hung TF, Chueh YL, Ho JC: High-performance indium phosphide nanowires synthesized on amorphous substrates: from formation mechanism to optical and electrical transport measurements. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 10704–10708. 10.1039/c2jm31232hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Yang ZX, Wang FY, Han N, Lin H, Cheung HY, Fang M, Yip S, Hung TF, Wong CY, Ho JC: Crystalline GaSb nanowires synthesized on amorphous substrates: from the formation mechanism to p-channel transistor applications. ACS Appl Mat Interfaces 2013, 5: 10946–10952. 10.1021/am403161tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim BK, Kim JJ, Lee JO, Kong KJ, Seo HJ, Lee CJ: Top-gated field-effect transistor and rectifying diode operation of core-shell structured GaP nanowire devices. Phys Rev B 2005, 71: 153313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Fan ZY, Ho JC, Takahashi T, Yerushalmi R, Takei K, Ford AC, Chueh YL, Javey A: Toward the development of printable nanowire electronics and sensors. Adv Mater 2009, 21: 3730–3743. 10.1002/adma.200900860View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Han N, Wang F, Hou JJ, Xiu F, Yip S, Hui AT, Hung T, Ho JC: Controllable p-n switching behaviors of GaAs nanowires via an interface effect. ACS Nano 2012, 6: 4428–4433. 10.1021/nn3011416View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi WS, Zheng YF, Wang N, Lee CS, Lee ST: A general synthetic route to III-V compound semiconductor nanowires. Adv Mater 2001, 13: 591–594. 10.1002/1521-4095(200104)13:8<591::AID-ADMA591>3.0.CO;2-#View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen PC, Shen GZ, Chen HT, Ha YG, Wu C, Sukcharoenchoke S, Fu Y, Liu J, Facchetti A, Marks TJ, Thompson ME, Zhou CW: High-performance single-crystalline arsenic-doped indium oxide nanowires for transparent thin-film transistors and active matrix organic light-emitting diode displays. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 3383–3390. 10.1021/nn900704cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Speight JG: Lange's Handbook of Chemistry. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.Google Scholar
  28. Schmidt V, Senz S, Gösele U: Diameter-dependent growth direction of epitaxial silicon nanowires. Nano Lett 2005, 5: 931–935. 10.1021/nl050462gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Cai Y, Chan SK, Soar IK, Chan YT, Su DS, Wang N: The size-dependent growth direction of ZnSe nanowires. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 109–114. 10.1002/adma.200500822View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Feng P, Xue XY, Liu YG, Wan Q, Wang TH: Achieving fast oxygen response in individual β-Ga2O3 nanowires by ultraviolet illumination. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89: 112114. 10.1063/1.2349278View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Tippins H: Optical absorption and photoconductivity in the band edge of β-Ga2O3. Phys Rev 1965, 140: A316. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A316View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang GQ, Tateno K, Sanada H, Tawara T, Gotoh H, Nakano H: Synthesis of GaAs nanowires with very small diameters and their optical properties with the radial quantum-confinement effect. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 123104. 10.1063/1.3229886View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Han et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.