Out-diffused silver island films for surface-enhanced Raman scattering protected with TiO2 films using atomic layer deposition

  • Semen Chervinskii1, 2Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Antti Matikainen1,

      Affiliated with

      • Alexey Dergachev3,

        Affiliated with

        • Andrey A Lipovskii2, 4 and

          Affiliated with

          • Seppo Honkanen1

            Affiliated with

            Nanoscale Research Letters20149:398

            DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-398

            Received: 18 July 2014

            Accepted: 5 August 2014

            Published: 15 August 2014


            We fabricated self-assembled silver nanoisland films using a recently developed technique based on out-diffusion of silver from an ion-exchanged glass substrate in reducing atmosphere. We demonstrate that the position of the surface plasmon resonance of the films depends on the conditions of the film growth. The resonance can be gradually shifted up to 100 nm towards longer wavelengths by using atomic layer deposition of titania, from 3 to 100 nm in thickness, upon the film. Examination of the nanoisland films in surface-enhanced Raman spectrometry showed that, in spite of a drop of the surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) signal after the titania spacer deposition, the Raman signal can be observed with spacers up to 7 nm in thickness. Denser nanoisland films show slower decay of the SERS signal with the increase in spacer thickness.


            78.67.Sc (nanoaggregates; nanocomposites); 81.16.Dn (self-assembly); 74.25.nd (Raman and optical spectroscopy)


            Surface plasmon resonance Nanoparticle Nanoisland Film Self-assembly Dielectric spacer


            Metal island films (MIFs) have attracted significant attention due to the strong surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect in these nanoislands. The spectral position of the SPR is influenced and can be tuned by the MIF density as well as the substrate and cover materials used [13]. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) in biological and chemical sensing [4] can be regarded as one of the most intriguing applications of MIFs. It can provide at least 1010- to 1012-fold intensity enhancement compared to the normal Raman scattering [3]. The main reason for this intensity enhancement is the electromagnetic (EM) enhancement mechanism prevailing over the chemical enhancement (CHEM) by several orders of magnitude [3]. This is because the EM enhancement is proportional to about the forth power of the SPR-increased local electric field input in Raman scattering, i.e., in the analyzed media adsorbed on the MIF (an adsorbate), while the reported CHEM enhancement factors, due to metal island-adsorbate interaction, are approximately 102. It is essential to decrease the distance between separate metal islands in a MIF, which results in the increase of the local electric field intensity and, consequently, in a larger SERS signal [5]. Other prospective applications of MIFs include catalysis [6, 7], photovoltaics [8], and fluorescence enhancement [9]. For many practical uses, MIFs should be protected with a dielectric cover, which influences not only the CHEM but also the EM enhancement of SERS through the change of local electric field in adsorbates. At the same time, cover-induced shifts of the SPR spectral position can be used to tune SERS measurements for a specific wavelength, which is of high importance for surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering [10]. The influence of MIF dielectric covers (spacers between the MIF and an analyte) on SERS intensity has been studied for more than two decades [11]. However, only the recent use of a very precise atomic layer deposition (ALD) technique has allowed obtaining quantitative results related to the SERS influence by alumina spacers deposited on metal microspheres [3], MIFs [12], and metal nanowires [13]. However, due to the difference in metal nanoislands and nanoparticles used in the experiment, these results can hardly be compared, and they contradict the data obtained in SERS experiments using MIFs covered with non-ALD spacers [14]. It is worth to note that the key issues in this comparison are the SPR shift and the local electric field decay vs the spacer thickness. It is worth to note that dielectric-capped isolated metal nanospheres have already demonstrated their effective applicability in photovoltaics [15] and SERS [16].

            Here we present our studies on the influence of a high-index TiO2 ALD spacer on the SPR position and SERS intensity in the case of silver island films grown on soda-lime glass substrates using our recently developed silver out-diffusion (SOD) technique [17]. It is important to note that MIFs are highly fragile and, therefore, they must be protected for any practical use. The use of conformally grown ALD films is ideal for protecting MIFs with a cover layer, since the layer thickness can be controlled at an atomic level and the initial surface relief structure can be maintained with thin cover layer thicknesses [18]. In the experiments, we varied the thickness of the ALD TiO2 spacer and the MIF structure. The interest in TiO2 spacers is twofold: (1) the high catalytic abilities of TiO2[1921] allowing the use of SERS with a titanium dioxide spacer in nanoscale organic and biochemistry studies and (2) the high refractive index of TiO2 providing stronger control of the ALD-coated MIF structure, which results in wider spectral tunability of the system.


            MIF formation and characterization

            We fabricated silver nanoisland films using SOD from glass in the course of the ion-exchanged glass substrate annealing in a reducing hydrogen atmosphere. In the experiments, we used soda-lime glass microscope slides produced by Menzel [22]. The silver-sodium ion exchange was performed at 325°C in an ion-exchange bath containing 5 wt.% of silver nitrate and 95 wt.% of sodium nitrate as was reported elsewhere [23]. One-millimeter-thick slides with a size of 20 × 30 mm2 were immersed in the melt for 20 min, which provided a few microns of silver penetration depth in the glass. Optical absorption spectroscopy of the ion-exchanged slides did not show any absorption peaks in the spectral range corresponding to the surface plasmon resonance, which indicated the absence of silver nanoparticles both in the bulk and on the surface of the slides. The ion-exchanged slides were annealed in hydrogen for 10 min to reduce silver ions to atoms and get a supersaturated solid solution of neutral silver in the glass matrix. According to the proposed mechanism [24], this results in the formation of both silver nanoparticles within the glass and a silver island film on the glass surface (MIF) due to the out-diffusion of silver atoms.

            After the MIF formation, we measured the optical absorption spectra of the samples using a Specord 50 spectrophotometer (Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). To distinguish the MIF optical absorption and absorption of light by silver nanoparticles formed in the bulk of the glass slides, we subtracted the spectra of the samples after the surface film removal from the spectra measured after the processing of the glass slides in hydrogen atmosphere. The fragility of the MIFs allowed cleaning the glass surface from the nanoislands using just cotton with acetone. The topography of the MIFs was characterized with a Veeco Dimension 3100 atomic force microscope (AFM; Veeco Instruments Inc., Plainview, NY, USA), which allowed studying both the shape of separate silver islands and their size and distribution corresponding to different SOD regimes.

            Atomic layer deposition and characterization

            ALD was used to coat the MIF samples with thin layers of titanium dioxide. TiO2 was chosen for its high refractive index (n = 2.27) strongly influencing the SPR wavelength and because of its applicability for photocatalysis. Films were deposited at 120°C with Beneq TFS-200 reactor (Beneq, Espoo, Finland) using titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4) and water (H2O) as precursors, and between each deposition cycle, a nitrogen purge was used to remove extra precursor materials from the reactor chamber.

            The samples covered with TiO2 film of different thicknesses were also characterized with a Specord 50 spectrophotometer and a Veeco Dimension 3100 atomic force microscope.

            Surface-enhanced Raman scattering measurements

            Signal enhancement properties of the MIF samples were examined using rhodamine 6G as a target molecule. Five-microliter droplets of 1 μM rhodamine (diluted in water) were deposited on all samples and allowed to dry forming an analyte-covered circular area of 4 to 5 mm in diameter. Raman scattering was measured using an inVia Raman microscope system (Renishaw, Gloucestershire, UK) with a 514-nm excitation laser. The beam was focused into an approximately 5-μm spot, and for each sample, nine measurements were performed from an area of 50 × 50 μm2 and the spectra were collected using an optical power of 50 μW and exposure times of 10 and 20 s for the uncoated and coated samples, respectively. The collected spectra were averaged and the background fluorescence was subtracted using an asymmetric least squares smoothing.

            Results and discussion

            Structure and optical absorption of initial MIF

            AFM studies of SOD MIF samples allowed concluding that depending on the mode of SOD we can fabricate MIFs consisting of tiny (approximately 10 nm), nearly isolated silver nanoislands (Figure 1a), bigger islands which can be placed very closely (Figure 1b), and partly coagulated nanoislands (Figure 1c).
            Figure 1

            AFM images of MIFs prepared using annealing in hydrogen at 150°C (a), 250°C (b), and 300°C (c).

            The optical absorption spectra of the prepared samples and the spectra of MIFs obtained using subtraction of spectra measured with and without the MIF are presented in Figure 2. One can see that the shape and position of the SPR peak in the absorption spectra are strongly influenced by the processing mode, but generally higher temperature of SOD results in higher SPR absorption. The SPR peak moves from 420- to 470-nm wavelength with the increase of processing temperature from 150°C to 250°C. Further increase in SOD temperature does not move the peak so much. The position of the SPR peak corresponds to the size of silver islands, the bigger is the size the longer is the SPR wavelength [17]. The peculiarities of the spectra in the 350- to 370-nm region can be attributed to the quadrupole plasmon resonance [24], the absorption of atomic silver, and the proximity of this region to the absorption edge of silver ion-enriched glass. The latter may result in artifacts in the differential spectra. It should be noted that no peculiarities in the 350- to 370-nm range were observed in raw spectra measured after SOD.
            Figure 2

            Optical absorption spectra and differential spectra. Optical absorption spectra of samples with a MIF prepared using annealing in hydrogen at 150°C, 250°C, and 300°C before (solid line) and after (dashed line) the MIF removal (a) and the differential spectra corresponding to the MIFs themselves (b).

            Optical absorption and structure of MIF with TiO2 cover

            AFM characterizations performed after TiO2 deposition (see Figure 3) revealed that the surface profile formed by silver nanoislands becomes smoother very slowly with the increase in the thickness of the ALD layer. The relief of the ALD-covered MIF is very close to the relief of the initial MIF for thinner films, and it stays unsmooth and critically related to the relief of the MIF even up to 200-nm ALD film thicknesses. This behavior was the same for all studied MIFs.
            Figure 3

            AFM images of MIFs. The MIFs were prepared using annealing in hydrogen at 250°C and coated with 3-nm (top left), 10-nm (top right), 50-nm (bottom left), and 200-nm (bottom right) TiO2.

            The optical absorption spectra of the TiO2-covered MIFs demonstrate the shift of the SPR peak towards a longer wavelength, as illustrated in Figure 4.
            Figure 4

            Optical absorption spectra of the films. The films were prepared using annealing in hydrogen at 150°C and coated with ALD-TiO2 of different thicknesses as marked near the curves. The substrate spectrum is subtracted. The SPR positions are indicated with the lines.

            In Figure 5, the SPR wavelength found using the spectra decomposition is plotted as a function of the ALD TiO2 cover thickness. One can see that the shift of the SPR saturates for thicker films; however, it is difficult to conclude about the exact thickness corresponding to the saturation. Nevertheless, this thickness exceeds approximately 40 nm, and the shift is bigger for the MIFs with the SPR position at longer wavelengths (see the inset in Figure 5).
            Figure 5

            The position of surface plasmon resonance vs the thickness of TiO 2 cover. For MIFs prepared using annealing in hydrogen at 150°C, 250°C, and 300°C. The absorption spectra of initial MIFs are presented in Figure 2b. Inset: the SPR shift vs the cover thickness for all prepared samples; stars denote the samples annealed at 150°C, the smallest silver islands.

            SERS studies: TiO2 spacer and MIF structure influence

            SERS studies of the rhodamine 6G deposited on initial and covered MIFs showed that after the ALD of a 3-nm TiO2 spacer the measured SERS signal dropped about 1.5 orders of magnitude (samples annealed in hydrogen at 150°C, 250°C, and 300°C), as is illustrated in Figure 6. The spacer influence on the SERS intensity is illustrated in Figure 7.To compare the spacer effect on the SERS signal obtained using differing MIFs, we performed similar measurements using a denser MIF (sample annealed in hydrogen at 300°C). The results of these measurements are presented in Figure 8. Comparing Figures 7 and 8, one can see that the influence of the spacer thickness is weaker in the case of a denser MIF, that is, the SERS signals go down slower.
            Figure 6

            SERS spectra of rhodamine 6G. Rhodamine 6G was deposited onto uncoated (a) and coated with 3-nm TiO2(b) films prepared using annealing in hydrogen at 150°C, 250°C, and 300°C. Measurement power 50 μW, spot diameter 5 μm, and exposure time 10 s. Insets: raw signal with background fluorescence.

            Figure 7

            SERS spectra of rhodamine 6G. Measured using the TiO2-covered sample prepared using annealing in hydrogen at 250°C for different spacer thicknesses. Measurement power 50 μW, exposure time 20 s, and approximate spot size 5 μm. Inset: absorption spectrum of the initial MIF.

            Figure 8

            SERS spectra of rhodamine 6G. Measured using the TiO2-covered sample prepared using annealing in hydrogen at 300°C for different spacer thicknesses. Measurement power 50 μW, exposure time 20 s, and approximate spot size 5 μm. Inset: absorption spectrum of the initial MIF.


            The MIF formation occurs because the glass surface is a stronger sink for neutral silver atoms than the arising nuclei of metal silver in the bulk of the glass [25]. Thus, lowering the temperature and shortening the duration of hydrogen processing can provide prevailing of the MIF over the nanoparticles in the bulk of the glass growth. Varying the hydrogen annealing temperature and duration allowed us to grow MIFs differing in silver nanoisland size and concentration. It is worth to note that longer SOD duration results in simultaneous increase of concentration and size of silver nanoislands. The position of SPR in the SOD-made MIFs falls in the spectral range below 500 nm, the exact position of the SPR being dependent on the mode of the MIF preparation. These MIFs demonstrate their applicability in SERS and being covered with up to 7.5-nm-thick titania layers allow registering below a monolayer of rhodamine 6G. After ALD of titania, the shift of the SPR occurs in the TiO2-covered MIFs. This is due to the change in the dielectric surrounding of silver nanoislands. In our case, their shape is very close to a hemispherical one [17] and the shift occurs in the same way as in the case of spherical nanoparticles [26]. The origin of this shift is the loading of the electron-electric field oscillating system with a higher permittivity dielectric. Since the index and permittivity of the titanium dioxide film exceed the ones of air, the SPR frequency drops and, respectively, the resonant wavelength increases. This situation is seen particularly clearly with thicker TiO2 layers. To evaluate this spectral shift, one should solve the electromagnetic problem describing the geometry presented in insets a-c in Figure 9. However, there still is no any exact solution for this problem, and the reported numerical calculations [27] performed for an isolated hemisphere in a uniform dielectric surrounding (ϵsub = ϵcover) have shown that even in this case about 1% rounding of the hemisphere edge results in a meaningful shift of the resonant frequency. In measurements, it is difficult to characterize the curvature of the edges of a nanoisland formed in SOD on a glass substrate, and this does not allow constructing a numerical model for this situation. We can only assume that the shapes of the nanoislands in differently prepared MIFs are very similar. This is indeed indicated by the inset in Figure 5 as the shift of the SPR under the thickest TiO2 cover is practically the same for all the samples.
            Figure 9

            Schematic of SPR electric field localization (lateral component) in MIF for different dielectric cover thicknesses.

            The spectral shift of the SPR saturates when the electric field E generated by a nanoisland under probing electromagnetic wave is completely localized within the covering film and the glass substrate as shown in Figure 9 (inset c). For thinner TiO2 films, the tail of the SPR electric field penetrates through the covering layer, that is, the electric field is partly localized in the air (see Figure 9, inset b). In other words, the effective dielectric permittivity of the nanoisland surrounding is less for thinner covers than for thicker covers. This results in weaker dielectric loading of the SPR and corresponds to its unsaturated spectral shift, which tends to saturate with the TiO2 film thickness increase. Thus, the saturated SPR shift indicates that the thickness of the cover exceeds the length of the SPR electric field penetration into the cover (Figure 9, inset c).

            As measured with absorption spectroscopy, the spectral shift of the SPR in TiO2-covered MIF saturates at about 40- to 50-nm cover thickness. We can suppose that the SPR electric field intensity decays in TiO2 film at about the same length. Unfortunately, comparing the dependences of the SPR spectral shift in Figure 5, one can hardly conclude whether there is a difference in the SPR decay length for differently prepared MIFs. The measured Raman scattering signal IRaman should decay much faster. If the glass surface is covered with silver nanospheres, I Raman ~ r r + d 12 http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-398/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2157_IEq1_HTML.gif[28] for separate molecules and I Raman ~ r r + d 10 http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-9-398/MediaObjects/11671_2014_Article_2157_IEq2_HTML.gif[29] for a monolayer of an analyte, where r is the radius of silver microsphere and d is the distance from the microsphere to the analyte. Definitely, one can see a very fast Raman signal decay in Figure 6 where the decrease in the signal relative to the uncovered MIF is presented. The decay is due to the spacer thickness influence and due to the absence of CHEM input (if any in the present case). At the same time, the spacer protects the MIF providing its longer time stability.

            The increase in MIF density, that is, in size and in surface concentration of nanoislands, should result in a higher SERS signal (Figure 6). This is because of (a) the increase of the cross section of the nanoisland-analyte interaction due to a geometrical factor, that is, the increase of the effective area of the MIF, and (b) the surface concentration of ‘hot spots’ which are supposed to be the main origin of extremely high SERS signals [30, 31]. This can be easily seen in Figure 6a where a denser film provides higher IRaman. At the same time, the increase in the size of nanoislands, indicated by the redshift of the SPR (Figure 4), and their coagulation definitely result in the slowing of the spatial decay of the SPR electric field with the spacer thickness. Figures 7 and 8, where one can see that the Raman signal decay with the spacer thickness is slower for the denser film, clearly illustrate this. This phenomenon can be very roughly explained through the increase in the effective size of nanoislands d, but its detailed description will definitely require accounting for peculiarities related to the redistribution of local SPR fields in the partly aggregated MIF [32]. It is worth to note that thicker TiO2 films, corresponding to full decay of the local electric field within the spacer, exclude SERS-related applications of the MIFs. However, they can be effectively used in applications which do not require the use of the tail of the electric field outside the film. Examples of such applications include tuning of optical absorption spectra, enhancement of resonant luminescence of emitters embedded into the film, and tuning the wavelength range of optical nonlinearity.


            The performed studies demonstrate that silver nanoisland films formed using out-diffusion of silver from glass substrates during thermal processing in hydrogen atmosphere can be effectively used in SERS measurements. The enhancement of the Raman signal increases with the density of the nanoisland film. The surface profile of dielectrics deposited upon the MIF using the ALD technique replicates the profile of the initial MIF, and the smoothing of the dielectric surface profile with the deposited thickness is rather slow except for the smallest gaps between the nanoislands. The deposition of a titanium dioxide film results in a redshift of the SPR wavelength relative to the SPR wavelength of the initial film. This shift is up to hundred nanometers allowing the tuning of the central wavelength of the SPR. The shift saturates at a titania film thickness of 40 to 50 nm. SERS experiments performed with a R6G probe show that the SPR field spatial decay is less for denser MIFs, that is, for these MIFs, the titania spacer can be thicker. Finally, catalytically active ALD-TiO2 films can be effectively used to protect very fragile silver nanoislands from sulfidation, oxidation, pollutions, etc., allowing the maintenance of the SERS properties of the MIF. Additionally, this allows the fine-tuning of the SPR position and, respectively, conditions for surface-enhanced resonant Raman scattering (SERRS).



            atomic force microscopy


            atomic layer deposition


            chemical enhancement


            metal island film


            surface-enhanced Raman scattering


            surface plasmon resonance.



            This study was supported by the FP7 project NANOCOM, ERA.Net RUS project AN2, Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation project 16.1233.2014/K, and Academy of Finland project #267270. The AFM studies were performed using the equipment of the Joint Research Centre ‘Material science and characterization in advanced technology’ (Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia).

            Authors’ Affiliations

            Institute of Photonics, University of Eastern Finland
            Institute of Physics, Nanotechnology and Telecommunications, St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University
            Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the RAS
            Department of Physics and Technology of Nanostructures, St. Petersburg Academic University


            1. Royer P, Goudonnet JP, Warmack RJ, Ferrell TL: Substrate effects on surface-plasmon spectra in metal-island films. Phys Rev B 1987, 35: 3753.View Article
            2. Ji-Fei W, Hong-Jian L, Zi-You Z, Xue-Yong L, Ju L, Hai-Yan Y: Tunable surface-plasmon-resonance wavelength of silver island films. Chin Phys B 2010, 19: 117310. 10.1088/1674-1056/19/11/117310View Article
            3. Dieringer JA, McFarland AD, Shah NC, Stuart DA, Whitney AV, Yonzon CR, Young MA, Zhang X, Van Duyne RP: Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy: new materials, concepts, characterization tools, and applications. Faraday Discuss 2006, 132: 9–26.View Article
            4. Bantz KC, Meyer AF, Wittenberg NJ, Im H, Kurtulus O, Lee SH, Lindquist NC, Oh S-H, Haynes CL: Recent progress in SERS biosensing. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011, 13: 11551–11567. 10.1039/c0cp01841dView Article
            5. Lee SJ, Guan ZQ, Xu HX, Moskovits M: Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and nanogeometry: the plasmonic origin of SERS. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111: 17985–17988. 10.1021/jp077422gView Article
            6. Boerio FJ, Tsai WH, Montaudo G: Metal-catalyzed oxidation of poly (α-methylstyrene) during surface-enhanced Raman scattering. J Polymer Sci B Polymer Phys 1989, 27: 1017–1027.View Article
            7. Prieto G, Zečević J, Friedrich H, de Jong KP, de Jongh PE: Towards stable catalysts by controlling collective properties of supported metal nanoparticles. Nature Materials 2013, 12: 34–39.View Article
            8. Atwater HA, Polman A: Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices. Nature Materials 2010, 9: 205–213. 10.1038/nmat2629View Article
            9. Aslan K, Leonenko Z, Lakowicz JR, Geddes CD: Annealed silver-island films for applications in metal-enhanced fluorescence: interpretation in terms of radiating plasmons. J Fluorescence 2005, 15: 643–654. 10.1007/s10895-005-2970-zView Article
            10. McNay G, Eustace D, Smith WE, Faulds K, Graham D: Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering (SERRS): a review of applications. Appl Spectroscopy 2011, 65: 825–837. 10.1366/11-06365View Article
            11. Kümmerlen J, Leitner A, Brunner H, Aussenegg FR, Wokaun A: Enhanced dye fluorescence over silver island films: analysis of the distance dependence. Mol Phys 1993, 80: 1031–1046. 10.1080/00268979300102851View Article
            12. John JF, Mahurin S, Daib S, Sepaniaka MJ: Use of atomic layer deposition to improve the stability of silver substrates for in situ, high-temperature SERS measurements. J Raman Spectrosc 2010, 41: 4–11. 10.1002/jrs.2395View Article
            13. Formo EV, Mahurin SM, Dai S: Robust SERS substrates generated by coupling a bottom-up approach and atomic layer deposition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2010, 2: 1987–1991. 10.1021/am100272hView Article
            14. Kukushkin VI, Van'kov AB, Kukushkin IV: Long-range manifestation of surface-enhanced Raman scattering. JETP Letters 2013, 98: 64–69. 10.1134/S0021364013150113View Article
            15. Choi H, Chen WT, Kamat PV: Know thy nano neighbor. Plasmonic versus electron charging effects of metal nanoparticles in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 2012, 6: 4418–4427. 10.1021/nn301137rView Article
            16. Li JF, Huang YF, Ding Y, Yang ZL, Li SB, Zhou XS, Fan FR, Zhang W, Zhou ZY, Wu DY, Ren B, Wang ZL, Tian ZQ: Shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nature 2010, 464: 392–395. 10.1038/nature08907View Article
            17. Chervinskii S, Sevriuk V, Reduto I, Lipovskii A: Formation and 2D-patterning of silver nanoisland film using thermal poling and out-diffusion from glass. J Appl Phys 2013, 114: 224301. 10.1063/1.4840996View Article
            18. Ritala M, Leskelä M: Atomic layer deposition. In Handbook of Thin Film Materials. Volume 1 edition. Edited by: Nalwa HS. San Diego: Academic; 2001:103–159.
            19. Nakata K, Fujishima A: TiO2 photocatalysis: design and applications. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 2012, 13: 169–189. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.06.001View Article
            20. Sang X, Phan TG, Sugihara S, Yagyu F, Okitsu S, Maneekarn N, Müller WE, Ushijima H: Photocatalytic inactivation of diarrheal viruses by visible-light-catalytic titanium dioxide. Clin Lab 2007, 53: 413–21.
            21. Pelaeza M, Nolan NT, Pillai SC, Seery MK, Falaras P, Kontos AG, Dunlop PSM, Hamilton JWJ, Byrne JA, O'Shea K, Entezari MH, Dionysiou DD: A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental 2012, 125: 331–349.View Article
            22. Menzel-Glaser: microscope slides. http://​www.​menzel.​de/​Microscope-Slides.​687.​0.​html?​&​L=​1
            23. Linares J, Sotelo D, Lipovskii AA, Zhurikhina VV, Tagantsev DK, Turunen J: New glasses for graded-index optics: influence of non-linear diffusion in the formation of optical microstructures. Optical Materials 2000, 14: 145–153. 10.1016/S0925-3467(99)00116-0View Article
            24. Kaganovskii Y, Lipovskii A, Rosenbluh M, Zhurikhina V: Formation of nanoclusters through silver reduction in glasses: the model. J Non-Cryst Solids 2007, 353: 2263–2271. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.03.003View Article
            25. Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC: The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107: 668–677.View Article
            26. Kreibig U, Vollmer M: Optical Properties of Metal Clusters. Berlin: Springer; 1995.View Article
            27. Kettunen H, Wallen H, Sihvola A: Electrostatic resonances of a negative-permittivity hemisphere. J Appl Phys 2008, 103: 094112. 10.1063/1.2917402View Article
            28. McCall SL, Plat PM, Wolff PA: Surface enhanced Raman scattering. Phys Lett 1980, 77A: 381–383.View Article
            29. Cotton TM, Uphaus RH, Mobius DJ: Distance dependence of SERS: enhancement in Langmuir-Blodgett dye multilayers. J Phys Chem 1986, 90: 6071–6073. 10.1021/j100281a003View Article
            30. Maher RC: SERS hot spots. In Raman Spectroscopy for Nanomaterials Characterization. Berlin: Springer; 2012:215–260.View Article
            31. Kleinman SL, Frontiera RR, Henry A-I, Dieringer JA, Van Duyne RP: Creating, characterizing, and controlling chemistry with SERS hot spots. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2013, 15: 21–36. 10.1039/c2cp42598jView Article
            32. Borys NJ, Shafran E, Lupton JM: Surface plasmon delocalization in silver nanoparticle aggregates revealed by subdiffraction supercontinuum hot spots. Scientific Reports 2013, 3: 2090.View Article


            © Chervinskii et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

            This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.