Immobilization of peroxidase enzyme onto the porous silicon structure for enhancing its activity and stability
© Sahare et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 19 May 2014
Accepted: 8 July 2014
Published: 21 August 2014
In this work, a commercial peroxidase was immobilized onto porous silicon (PS) support functionalized with 3-aminopropyldiethoxysilane (APDES) and the performance of the obtained catalytic microreactor was studied. The immobilization steps were monitored and the activity of the immobilized enzyme in the PS pores was spectrophotometrically determined. The enzyme immobilization in porous silicon has demonstrated its potential as highly efficient enzymatic reactor. The effect of a polar organic solvent (acetonitrile) and the temperature (up to 50°C) on the activity and stability of the biocatalytic microreactor were studied. After 2-h incubation in organic solvent, the microreactor retained 80% of its initial activity in contrast to the system with free soluble peroxidase that lost 95% of its activity in the same period of time. Peroxidase immobilized into the spaces of the porous silicon support would be perspective for applications in treatments for environmental security such as removal of leached dye in textile industry or in treatment of different industrial effluents. The system can be also applied in the field of biomedicine.
KeywordsPorous silicon Peroxidase Immobilization Microreactors
Among microelectronic materials, silicon (Si) has the most mature and low-cost technology; hence, several research groups are approaching Si-compatible technology as an innovative platform for biosensors. Porous silicon has been intensively investigated for a variety of applications such as chemical and biological sensors, medical diagnostics, optical band pass filters, microchemical reactors, and microfuel cells. Moreover, Si-based matrixes have been proved to be a very useful support for the immobilization of enzymes thanks to their capability of retaining biological activity. Silicon (Si) received a lot of attention due to its specific semiconductor properties and furthermore because it allows the development of a broad range of micropatterning processes in order to achieve functional features for future integration in complex systems.
Furthermore, the Si-H and Si-OH groups on porous silicon surface can be easily modified by many reactive reagents and derivatives with receptors, thus enabling the identification of ligands. Microreactors are miniaturized reaction systems fabricated by microtechnology and precision engineering. The microreactors work with micro and nanoliter volumes of reaction media and ensure high efficiency and reproducibility of biocatalytic processes. Enzymatic microreactors have been already proposed as integrated components termed lab-on-a-chip for analytical applications in micrototal analysis systems (MTAS). There, the immobilization strategies to graft different chemical substances on the surface of a microreactor, a support, are used for a design of necessary conditions within the microreactor spaces. Surface modification by silanization is a very common method for particle functionalization. High density of free amino groups (-NH2) lying outwards the particle surface provides an excellent media for further chemical surface modification such as enzyme cross-linking with glutaraldehyde. The immobilization of enzymes in microreactors is mostly carried out in a covalent way. The main advantage of covalent immobilization is the retention of the enzyme during the whole biocatalytic process. Actually, immobilization is a well-established approach in a wide range of industrial applications. Both synthetic and natural inorganic materials such as clay, glass beads, silice-based materials, and celite have been used to immobilize enzymes, the natural catalysts for many biological processes. Among them, mesoporous silicates are the most interesting due to their attractive properties, availability, and simple preparation. Peroxidase immobilization on inorganic mesoporous silicates has proven to be an interesting alternative to improve enzyme functionality. The large regular repeating structures of photonic porous silicon structure offer the possibility of adsorbing or entrapping large biomolecules within their pores, providing a suitable microenvironment to stabilize the enzyme.
Peroxidases (EC 22.214.171.124, etc.) belong to a large family of enzymes that participate in a large number of natural processes developed in living organisms. They are ubiquitous in fungi, plants, and vertebrates. Their principal active sites contain a heme prosthetic group or, alternately, residues of redox-active cysteine or seleno-cysteine groups that are able to oxidize a large number of organic compounds initiated by one electron oxidation step. For all peroxidases, the natural substrate is hydrogen peroxide, but the oxidative process can be performed with many other organic hydro-peroxides such as lipid peroxides. In the oxidation of phenols or aromatic amines, peroxidases produce free radicals that may dimerise or polymerize and thus, in general, form products that are much less soluble in water. This property might be used in removing carcinogenic aromatic amines and phenols from industrial aqueous effluents. Enzymes are also involved in degradation of aromatic compounds and other xenobiotics, including pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and dioxins, and thus can be used for removal of aromatic pollutants[12, 13] as antioxidant, as indicators for food processing, in bioelectrodes and in the synthesis of conducting materials. Peroxidases could also be used in the synthesis of fine chemicals and optically and biologically active oxide. Despite the obviously practical value of peroxidases, at present, their commercial uses are limited, primarily due to its low stability in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, their natural substrate. All heme-proteins, including peroxidases, are inactivated in the presence of some concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. This process, described as a suicide inactivation, is especially important in the absence of reducing substrates, but its mechanism has not been yet fully elucidated. Although the interest to peroxidase started several decades ago, their application as biocatalysts in industrial processes is still negligible due to its inherent instability under operational conditions, mainly caused by the inactivation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. The development of techniques for enzyme stabilizing can improve a number of biocatalytic industrial processes. In this work, peroxidase enzyme has been immobilized onto porous silicon (PS) supports for the possible prevention from its self-inactivation and its stability under different operational conditions has been analyzed.
A commercial peroxidase, Baylase® RP, was kindly donated by Bayer Mexico (Mexico, Federal District, Mexico). Crystalline silicon was a product from Cemat Silicon (Warsaw, Poland). Glutaraldehyde, 3-aminopropyldiethoxysilane, guaiacol, and bovine serum albumin were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Bradford reagent was from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). All other chemical reagents used in our experiment were of analytical grade without further purification.
Fabrication of porous silicon(PS) <100 > oriented, heavily doped p-type Si wafers with resistivity 0.002 to 0.005 ohm-cm were electrochemically etched with an electrolyte composed of HF/ethanol/glycerol (3:7:1 (v/v)) at a constant current density of 50 mA cm-2 for 170 s to obtain a porous layer of 3,000 ± 60 nm.
Functionalization of porous support
The porous silicon samples were subjected to thermal oxidation in air at 600°C for 60 min. Silanization process with 3-aminopropyldiethoxysilane (APDES) was performed by immersing the sample in a 5% APDES in toluene for a period of 1 h and annealed at 110°C for 15 min. Glutaraldehyde (GTA, 2.5%) in phosphate buffer pH 6.0 was subsequently coupled to the support for 1 h and finally incubated with peroxidase for 24 h at 4°C. After each step of functionalization, the percent reflectance was measured and the chemical modification of the surface was verified by FTIR.
RIFTS, SEM, FTIR, and gravimetric measurement of enzymatic microreactor
Reflective interferometric Fourier transform method provides a fast and convenient method of extracting the basic optical parameters modified during the bio-functionalization steps onto of the PS surface. This method presents high sensitivity to small changes in the average refractive index of the porous thin film, allowing for direct and real-time monitoring of the binding of different species to the pore walls[19–22]. Reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy RIFTS analysis was performed on the specular reflectivity spectra of the PS measured with UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Lambda 950, Waltham, MA, USA). As gravimetric measurement is the most direct method of determining the porosity of porous silicon[23–25], the measured porosity of the sample is found to be approximately 80%.
The surface and cross section image of mesoporous silicon was obtained by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was used to identify and characterize the functional groups on the porous silicon surface. The FTIR spectra were collected at a resolution of 2 cm-1 on a Cary 640/660 FTIR Spectrometer - with an ATR accessory (Agilent Technologies, Mexico, Federal District, Mexico).
Steady-state measurements for peroxidase activity were carried out spectrophotometrically using guaiacol as electron donor substrate. Peroxidase activity was measured in 1 mL reaction solution containing 60 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.0 at 25 to 28°C using 3 mM guaiacol, 1 mM hydrogen peroxide as the substrates and by monitoring the absorbance changes at λ = 470 nm using molar extinction coefficient value of 26.6 mM-1 cm-1 for the product tetra-guaiacol formed by the enzymatic reaction. One unit of peroxidase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that caused the formation of micromoles of tetraguaiacol per min. The protein content was determined by Bradford method with the BioRad protein reagent.
Specific and non-specific immobilization
In an effort to compare the specific and non-specific immobilization of the enzyme load onto the microreactors, three different microreactors has been designed, (1) oxidized support immobilized with enzyme, (2) oxidized and ADPES treated then enzyme immobilization, and (3) oxidized, ADPES, and glutaraldehyde-activated surface incubated with the enzyme. The peroxidase activity of the anchored enzymes onto the pores of microreactors was detected by absorption spectroscopy using guaiacol as substrate at 470 nm.
Three different stabilities were tested for soluble and immobilized peroxidase preparations: Thermostability by incubating at 50°C, stability to organic solvent by incubating in 50% acetronitrile, and against inactivation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (1 mM). In all cases, aliquots of each sample were withdrawn at different times and assayed for enzymatic activity under the standard condition. The data were adjusted to first-order rate model in order to calculate inactivation rate constants under each condition.
Results and discussion
Preparation of porous silicon substrates
Reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy
Specific and non-specific immobilization
Effect of immobilization chemistry on the enzyme loading onto PS support
Enzyme activity (U)
Oxidized + enzyme
Oxidized + ADPES + enzyme
Oxidized + ADPES + GTA + enzyme
Effect of PS layer thickness on the enzymatic activity
Effect of PS layer thickness (Si wafer) on the enzymatic activity
Thickness of the porous layer
No detectable activity
Thermal stability of immobilized peroxidase enzyme
Stability of peroxidase in aqueous-organic solvent mixture
Stability of peroxidase in the presence of hydrogen peroxide
This work is focused on porous silicon surface functionalization through the covalent attachment of the peroxidase enzyme with the PS support. The immobilization of the enzyme onto the porous silicon support has been confirmed from the RIFTS and FTIR studies. The study of thickness of the porous layer onto the availability of enzyme showed that higher thickness hinders the passage of substrate into the pores, which results in lower activity. The immobilized support showed lower thermo-stability with respect to soluble/free enzyme due to the major heat transfer through silicon support. The inactivation profile of peroxidase in the presence of acetonitrile indicates that the immobilized peroxidase is protected from acetonitrile deactivation; thus, acetonitrile has been revealed to be a very promising solvent to perform biocatalysis with peroxidase in organic media. While the deactivation of the enzyme in the presence of H2O2 in immobilized support is almost similar as compared to the soluble enzyme, these results conclude that a commercial peroxidase enzyme immobilized onto the porous silicon nanostructure confers more stability against organic solvents for potential industrial applications.
P.S. is a third year PG student at CIICAp, UAEM. RVD is a senior scientist in Biotechnology Institute (IBT) of National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) working in the field of nano-biotechnology and bio-catalysis. MA is a scientist in IBT UNAM. VA is a senior scientist working in Research Centre for Engineering and Applied Sciences in the field of porous silicon and its applications.
The work was financially supported by CONACyT project: Ciencias Basicas #128953.
- Koh Y, Kim SJ, Park J, Park C, Cho S, Woo HG, Ko YC, Sohn H: Detection of avidin based on rugate-structured porous silicon interferometer. Bull Korean Chem Soc 2007, 28: 2083–2088.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Libertino S, Aiello V, Scandurra A, Renis M, Sinatra F: Immobilization of the enzyme glucose oxidase on both bulk and porous SiO2 surfaces. Sensors 2008, 8: 5637–5648.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu S, Pan C, Hu L, Zhang Y, Guo Z, Li X, Zou H: Enzymatic reaction of the immobilized enzyme on porous silicon studied by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 2004, 25: 3669–3676.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vilkner T, Janasek D, Manz A: Micro total analysis systems. Recent developments. Anal Chem 2004, 76: 3373–3386.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ivanova V, Tonkova A, Petrov K, Petrova P, Geneva P: Covalent attachment of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from genetically modified Escherichia coli on surface functionalized silica coated carriers and magnetic particles. J Bio Sci Biotech 2012, 7–13. http://www.jbb.uni-plovdiv.bg/documents/27807/178249/SE-2012–7-13.pdf/Google Scholar
- Longoria A, Tinoco R, Torres E: Enzyme technology of peroxidases: immobilization, chemical and genetic modification. In Biocatalysis Based on Heme Peroxidases. Edited by: Torres E, Ayala M. Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2010:209–243.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoffmann F, Cornelius M, Morell J, Froba M: Periodic mesoporousorganosilicas (PMOs): Past, present, and future. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2006, 6: 265–288.Google Scholar
- Aguila S, Vidal-Limon AM, Alderete JB, Sosa-Torres M, Vazquez-Duhalt R: Unusual activation during peroxidase reaction of a cytochrome c variant. J Mol Catal B Enzym 2013, 85–86: 187–192.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zámocky' M, Obinger C: Molecular Phylogeny of Heme Peroxidases. In Biocatalysis Based on Heme Peroxidases. Edited by: Torres E, Ayala M. Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2010:7–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klebanoff SJ: Myeloperoxidase-halide-hydrogen peroxide antibacterial system. J Bacteriol 1968, 95: 2131–2138.Google Scholar
- Hammel KE, Kayanaraman B, Kirk TK: Oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dibenzo(p)dioxins by Phanerochaetechrysosporium ligninase. J Biol Chem 1986, 36: 16948–16952.Google Scholar
- Klibanov AM, Scott KL: Peroxidase catalyzed removal from coal-conversion waste waters. Science 1983, 221: 259–260.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aitkenn MD: Waste treatment applications of enzymes: opportunities and obstacles. Chem Eng J 1993, 52: B49-B58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patel M, Day BJ: Metalloporphyrin class of therapeutic catalytic antioxidants. Trends Pharm Sci 1999, 20: 359–364.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ingram DT, Lamichhane CM, Rollins DM, Carr LE, Mallinson ET, Joseph SW: Development of a colony lift immunoassay to facilitate rapid detection and quantification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from agar plates and filter monitor membranes. Clin Diagnos Lab Immunol 1998, 5: 567–573.Google Scholar
- Gaspar S, Popescu IC, Gazaryan IG, Bautista AG, Sakharov IY, Mattiasson B, Csoregi E: Biosensors based on novel plant peroxidases: a comparative study. Electrochim Acta 2000, 46: 255–264.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu W, Kumar J, Tripathy S, Senecal KJ, Samuelson L: Enzymatically synthesized conducting polyaniline. J Am Chem Soc 1999, 121: 71–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Valderrama B, Ayala M, Vazquez-Duhalt R: Suicide inactivation of peroxidases and the challenge of engineering more robust enzymes. Chem Biol 2002, 9: 555–565.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jane A, Dronov R, Hodges A, Voelcker NH: Porous silicon biosensors on the advance. Trends Biotechnol 2009, 27(4):230–239.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sailor MJ, Link JR: "Smart dust" nanostructured devices in a grain of sand. Chem Commun 2005, 11: 1375–1383.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Orosco MM, Pacholski C, Sailor MJ: Real-time monitoring of enzyme activity in a mesoporous silicon double layer. Nat Nanotechnol 2009, 4(4):255–258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kilian KA, Boecking T, Gaus K, Gal M, Gooding JJ: Peptide-modified optical filters for detecting protease activity. ACS Nano 2007, 1(4):355–361.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Herino R, Bomchi G, Barla K, Bertran C: Porosity and pore size distributions of porous silicon. J Electrochem Soc: Solid State Technol 1987, 14: 1994–2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lazarouk S, Jaguiro P, Katsouba S, Maiello G, La Monica S, Masini G, Proverbio E, Ferrari A: Visual determination of thickness and porosity of porous silicon layers. Thin Solid Films 1997, 297: 97–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Foss SE, Kan PYY, Finstad TG: Single beam determination of porosity and etch rate in situ during etching of porous silicon. J Appl Phys 2005, 97(11):114909–114911.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chaurasia PK, Singh SK, Bharati SL: Study of peroxidase obtained from Daucus carota (carrot) juice extract. J Appl Chem 2013, 2(5):1123–1131.Google Scholar
- Giorgi S, Naama MI, Sinem E, Michal SLF, Ester S: DNA-directed immobilization of horseradish peroxidase onto porous SiO2 optical transducers. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 443.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hsieh HJ, Liu PC, Liao WJ: Immobilization of invertase via carbohydrate moiety on chitosan to enhance its thermal stability. Biotechnol Lett 2000, 22: 1459–1464.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin VS-Y, Motesharei K, Dancil K-PS, Sailor MJ, Ghadiri MR: A porous silicon-based optical interferometric biosensor. Science 1997, 278(5339):840.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pacholski C, Sartor M, Sailor MJ, Cunin F, Miskelly GM: Biosensing using porous silicon double-layer interferometers: reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127(33):11636.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz MP, Derfus AM, Alvarez SD, Bhatia SN, Sailor MJ: The smart Petri dish: a nanostructured photonic crystal for real-time monitoring of living cells. Langmuir 2006, 22: 7084.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Naveas N, Hernandez-Montelongo J, Pulido R, Torres-Costa V, Villanueva-Guerrero R, Ruiz JPG, Manso-Silván M: Fabrication and characterization of a chemically oxidized-nanostructured porous silicon based biosensor implementing orienting protein A. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 2014, 115: 310–316.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bragaru M, Simion M, Miu M, Ignat T, Kleps I, Schiopu V, Avram A, Craciunoiu V: Study of the nanostructurated silicon chemical functionalization. Roman J Inform Sci Technol 2008, 11: 397–407.Google Scholar
- Vandenberg ET, Bertilsson L, Leidberg BO, Uvdal K, Erlandsson R, Elwing H, Lundstrom I: Stucture of 3 Amino propyl tri ethoxy silane on silicon oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 1991, 147(1):103–118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim J: Formation, Structure, and Reactivity of Amino-Terminated Organic Films on Silicon Substrates. In Chapter 6: Interfaces and Interphases in analytical Chemistry. Volume 1062 Edited by: Helburn R, Vitha MF. 2011, 141–165. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bk-2011–1062.ch006Google Scholar
- Adochitei A, Drochioiu G: Rapid characterization of peptide secondary structure by FT-IR spectroscopy. Rev Roum Chim 2011, 56(8):783–791.Google Scholar
- Gloger M, Tischer W: Methods of enzymatic analysis. In vol 1. 3rd edn. Edited by: Bergmeyer HU, Bergmeyer J, Grassl M. VCH, Weinheim; 1983:142–163.Google Scholar
- Masudaa Y, Kugimiyaa S, KatoI K: Improvement of thermal-stability of enzyme immobilized onto mesoporous zirconia. J Asian Ceramic Soc 2014, 2: 11–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.