Open Access

Efficient perovskite solar cells based on low-temperature solution-processed (CH3NH3)PbI3 perovskite/CuInS2 planar heterojunctions

Nanoscale Research Letters20149:457

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-457

Received: 18 July 2014

Accepted: 27 August 2014

Published: 2 September 2014


In this work, the solution-processed CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite/copper indium disulfide (CuInS2) planar heterojunction solar cells with Al2O3 as a scaffold were fabricated at a temperature as low as 250°C for the first time, in which the indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass instead of the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)-coated glass was used as the light-incidence electrode and the solution-processed CuInS2 layer was prepared to replace the commonly used TiO2 layer in previously reported perovskite-based solar cells. The influence of the thickness of the as-prepared CuInS2 film on the performance of the ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cells was investigated. The ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell showed the best performance and achieved power conversion efficiency up to 5.30%.


Solution-processed Solar cells (CH3NH3)PbI3 Perovskite CuInS2


Thin-film solar cells have attracted considerable attention because of simplified and low-cost fabrication procedures compared to conventional silicon-based solar cells. The thin-film solar cells based on inorganic photovoltaic materials processed with expensive vacuum-based techniques and/or high-temperature sintering exhibit high efficiency [13]. However, the use of these thin-film solar cells is still limited because the manufacturing costs are still relatively high. To lower the cost of device fabrication, the low-temperature solution-based techniques such as spin coating and chemical bath deposition are needed to prepare inorganic photovoltaic materials. The thin-film solar cells based on the solution-processed inorganic nanocrystals such as PbS [4, 5], CdTe [6, 7], CdSe [8], copper indium disulfide (CuInS2) [9, 10], and Cu2ZnSnS4[11] have been demonstrated, but their maximum solar power conversion efficiency is still low. The main reason for the low efficiency is that the low-temperature solution-processed inorganic nanocrystals are typically amorphous or poorly crystalline, leading to poor charge carrier transport because of short carrier diffusion lengths (typically about 10 nm). Therefore, the new solution-based techniques to improve the crystalline structures of inorganic nanocrystals are needed. For example, to enhance the carrier transport in CuInS2, a method of using a molecular-based precursor solution has been presented [10] to synthesize CuInS2 nanocrystals with a polycrystalline structure at relatively lower temperatures (<250°C) for the solution-processed inorganic solar cells. Besides, the inorganic materials which can be processed with solution-based techniques and generated charge carriers with long diffusion lengths in the bulk are sought.

The recently reported semiconducting perovskite materials such as (CH3NH3)PbX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) could fulfil these requirements. These perovskites have high charge carrier mobilities and long charge carrier lifetime, which means that the light-generated charges have long carrier transport lengths [12]. It has been reported that the effective diffusion lengths are about 100 nm for both electrons and holes [13, 14]. In addition, these perovskites with a direct bandgap have a broad range of light absorption and high extinction coefficient [15, 16]. Due to their super electrical properties and super light-harvesting characteristics, the perovskites have been used in a variety of nanostructured solar cells and have achieved high-power conversion efficiencies (>9%) [1620]. In solid-state sensitized solar cells, the CH3NH3PbI3 used as the sensitizer has led to a high-power conversion efficiency of 15% [17]. The other perovskite-based nanostructured solar cells that commonly incorporated the perovskite as the absorbing layer between an n-type electron-transporting layer such as TiO2 and a p-type hole-transporting layer such as 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis(N, V-di-p-methoxyphenylamino)-9,9′- spirobifluorene (Spiro-OMeTAD) have also demonstrated high efficiencies [15, 18, 21]. Moreover, the research results reported by Lee et al.[16], Etgar et al.[22], and Ball et al.[23] showed that the perovskites have good charge (electron or hole)-transport properties, resulting in high efficiencies of the solar cells. Nevertheless, in these perovskite-based nanostructured solar cells, the transparent TiO2 compact layer between the conducting substrate and perovskite materials or the scaffold (Al2O3) generally requires high-temperature sintering at about 500°C [15, 17, 18, 23, 24], which limits substrate choice and is incompatible with the low-cost solar technology. Therefore, the low-temperature solution-processed semiconductor materials that could replace the TiO2 for the perovskite-based nanostructured solar cells are needed. In addition to the preparation method, the electronic energy levels (EELs) of those substitute materials are needed to match the EELs of the perovskite materials for efficient charge transfer. For this purpose, ZnO compact layer and ZnO nanorods are recently prepared by electrodeposition and chemical bath deposition, respectively, to replace the TiO2 by Kumar et al. [25]. It is worth noting that the materials used to replace the TiO2 do not necessarily have to be the n-type semiconductors such as the ZnO because the perovskites can conduct not only positive holes [22, 26] but also electrons [16].

It is known that CuInS2 as a p-type semiconductor is a very promising light-absorbing material for its direct bandgap of 1.5 eV, which is closely matched to the best bandgap (1.45 eV) of the solar cell materials [27]. Recently, a method of using a molecular-based precursor solution to synthesize CuInS2 nanocrystals at relatively lower temperatures (250°C) has been presented by Li et al. [10]. More importantly, the valence band level (−5.6 eV) of the CuInS2 is also matched to that (−5.6 or −6.5 eV) [13] of the (CH3NH3)PbI3, which is very beneficial to the hole transfer from the (CH3NH3)PbI3 to the CuInS2. Therefore, replacing the TiO2 with CuInS2 is reasonable. In this study, for the first time, the p-type semiconductor material, CuInS2, as both the light harvester and hole transporter is prepared by the reported method [10] to replace the commonly used n-type TiO2 in the perovskite-based solar cells. Moreover, the indium tin oxide (ITO) glass rather than the commonly used fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass in previously reported perovskite-based solar cells is used as a light-incidence electrode because the CuInS2 film can directly be deposited on the ITO glass at a temperature as low as 250°C. After the deposition of CuInS2 film, the Al2O3 and (CH3NH3)PbI3 are successively deposited on the CuInS2 film to form the CuInS2/(CH3NH3)PbI3 planar heterojunction. The porous Al2O3 layer acts as a scaffold. Finally, an evaporated Ag top electrode was deposited on the (CH3NH3)PbI3 at a pressure of 10−6 Torr to complete the device fabrication. The schematics and energy diagram of the prepared solar cells are shown in Figure 1a, b, respectively. The surface morphology, structure characterization, and optical property of the prepared CuInS2/(CH3NH3)PbI3 film are studied. Furthermore, the influence of the thickness of the CuInS2 film on the power conversion efficiency of the fabricated CuInS2/(CH3NH3)PbI3 planar heterojunction solar cell is investigated.
Figure 1

Schematic diagram (a) and energy diagram (b) of the ITO/CuInS 2 /Al 2 O 3 /(CH 3 NH 3 )PbI 3 /Ag device.



Indium acetate (In(OAc)3, 99.99%), copper iodode (CuI, 99.999%), thiourea (≥99.0%), 1-propionic acid (≥99.5%), γ-butyrolactone (≥99.0%), aluminum oxide (Al2O3, 20 wt.% in isopropanol), methylamine (40 wt.% in H2O), hydroiodic acid (57 wt.% in water), diethyl ether, and PbI2 (99.999%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All the reagents were used without further purification. Indium tin oxide-coated glass slides (ITO, ≤15 Ω/square, Wuhu Token Sci. Co., Ltd., China) were cleaned by successive ultrasonic treatment in deionized water, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol and then dried at 100°C for 10 min.

Synthesis of CuInS2 nanocrystal film on ITO substrate

CuInS2 nanocrystals were synthesized through a spin-coating method, which is similar to that reported by Li et al. [10]. Briefly, CuI (0.11 mmol), In(OAc)3 (0.1 mmol), and thiourea (0.5 mmol) were dissolved in a mixture of 1-butylamine (0.6 mL) and 1-propionic acid (40 μL) under a nitrogen atmosphere in a glovebox (O2 < 0.1 ppm, H2O < 0.1 ppm). The mixture was shaken for 1 min, and after which, the obtained CuInS2 precursor solution was then spin-cast onto the cleaned ITO substrates at 4,000 rpm for 30 s. Then, the obtained films were calcined at 150°C for 10 min and then heated to 250°C and held for 15 min at this temperature. To change the thickness of the CuInS2 film, a spinning-drying cycle was repeated several times. The ITO/CuInS2 sample after n cycles of CuInS2 deposition was denoted as ITO/CuInS2(n).

Synthesis of methylammonium iodide and (CH3NH3)PbI3

Methylammonium iodide (CH3NH3I) was synthesized by reacting methylamine (aqueous, 40 wt.%) and hydroiodic acid (aqueous, 57 wt.%) in an ice bath for 2 h with stirring, as described elsewhere [18]. After that, the solvent was evaporated and the precipitate was washed using diethyl ether three times and dried at 60°C for 24 h in a vacuum oven. The resulting product, CH3NH3I, was used without further purification. To obtain a (CH3NH3)PbI3 precursor, the synthesized CH3NH3I was mixed with PbI2 at a 1:1 mol ratio in γ-butyrolactone (40% by weight) at 60°C.

Solar cell fabrication

First, a Al2O3 layer was introduced on the ITO/CuInS2(n) films by spin coating isopropanol solution containing Al2O3 nanoparticles at 4,000 rpm for 60 s. After that, the films were dried at 150°C for 30 min to obtain ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3. Then, the prepared ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3 films were spin-coated with the obtained (CH3NH3)PbI3/γ-butyrolactone solution at 3,000 rpm for 60 s and then dried at 100°C for 1 h to form crystalline (CH3NH3)PbI3. The prepared ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3 films were naturally cooled to room temperature. All the experiment was finished in a nitrogen glovebox (O2 < 0.1 ppm, H2O < 0.1 ppm). Finally, a silver back contact layer was deposited by thermal evaporation onto the ITO/CuInS2(n)/(CH3NH3)PbI3 films from a silver wire (99.999%).


The surface morphology and structure of the prepared ITO/CuInS2(n) and ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3 films were characterized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JSM-7001 F, Japan Electron Optics Laboratory Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and power X-ray diffractometry (XRD) (DX-2500, Dandong Fangyuan Instrument Co., Ltd., Dandong, China), respectively. It should be noted that, for XRD measurement, the CuInS2 and (CH3NH3)PbI3 films are individually deposited on the cleaned glass without ITO layer to exclude the influence of the substrate on the XRD measurement. UV-visible absorption measurements were conducted using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the as-prepared solar cells were measured using a Keithley 2410 SourceMeter (Keithley Instruments, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA). A solar simulator (Newport Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) was used as the light source to provide AM 1.5 G simulated solar light (100 mW/cm2). Before each measurement, the light intensity was determined using a calibrated Si reference diode. For all measurements, the effective illumination area of the cells was 4 mm2. The monochromatic incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra for the fabricated solar cells were measured using a commercial setup (QTest Station 2000 IPCE Measurement System, Crowntech, Macungie, PA, USA).

Results and discussion

The morphology, structures, and chemical composition of the as-prepared CuInS2 were studied with SEM studies accompanied by energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX). Figure 2a shows a typical top-view SEM image of the ITO/CuInS2(1) film. As shown in Figure 2a, the surface of the ITO substrate is covered with the CuInS2 film. The CuInS2 film is composed of CuInS2 nanoparticles, and these CuInS2 nanoparticles appear to be fused together after heating at 250°C. Moreover, some voids can be clearly seen in the ITO/CuInS2 (1) film, which can be explained by the decomposition of volatile surface ligands and precurse materials [10]. For a comparison, the SEM top image of the ITO/CuInS2(2) is displayed in Figure 2b. It can be observed that, compared to the ITO/CuInS2(1) film, the number of the voids in the ITO/CuInS2(2) film decreases significantly, indicating that the voids in the ITO/CuInS2(1) have been filled by the CuInS2 precursor after two times of spin coating. In addition, the cross-sectional SEM images of the ITO/CuInS2(2), ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3, and ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag films are shown in Figure 2c. It clearly shows that the CuInS2(2) film with an average thickness of 400 nm is formed on the ITO glass, and there are no obvious voids in the film. After the deposition of Al2O3, the thickness of the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3 film increased. After the deposition of (CH3NH3) PbI3, the thickness of the ITO/CuInS2 (2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3) PbI3 film further increased to about 650 nm. The more important thing is that the (CH3NH3) PbI3 precursor solution permeated into the porous Al2O3 layer to form the (CH3NH3) PbI3. The corresponding EDX spectrum of ITO/CuInS2 (2) is shown in Figure 2d, which shows the film is mainly composed of copper (Cu), indium (In), and sulfur (S). The chemical compositional analysis reveals that the atomic ratio of Cu, In, and S is 25.33%, 24.9%, and 49.77%, respectively, close to 1:1:2, which confirms the formation of CuInS2.
Figure 2

The morphology, structures, and chemical composition of the as-prepared CuInS 2 . (a) Top view of the ITO/CuInS2(1) film; (b) the top-view SEM image of the ITO/CuInS2(2) film; (c) the cross-sectional images of the ITO/CuInS2(2), ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3, and ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag films; and (d) the EDX spectrum of the ITO/CuInS2(2) film.

To characterize the crystal structure of the CuInS2, a typical XRD pattern of the as-prepared CuInS2(3) film on a clean glass substrate is shown in Figure 3. The well-defined peaks can be referred to a tetragonal CuInS2 (112), (204), (220), (116), and (312) (JCPDS file no. 85–1575), which is in agreement with the reported results [10, 28, 29].
Figure 3

The XRD pattern of the as-prepared CuInS 2 (3) film.

Figure 4a shows a top-view SEM image of the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3 film. By comparing this image with that (Figure 2b) of the ITO/CuInS2(2) film, it can be clearly observed that the (CH3NH3)PbI3 film was deposited on the CuInS2. However, the solution-processed (CH3NH3)PbI3 films are not very uniform and coated the CuInS2 film only partially with micrometer-sized (CH3NH3)PbI3 platelets, which is very similar to the observed phenomenon in the (CH3NH3)PbI3-coved compact TiO2 film [21]. Furthermore, to characterize the crystal structure and phase composition of the synthesized (CH3NH3)PbI3 film, the XRD analysis of the prepared (CH3NH3)PbI3 film was performed and shown in Figure 4b. It can be seen from Figure 4b that the diffraction peaks are in good agreement with the tetragonal phase of the (CH3NH3) PbI3 perovskite [17, 30].
Figure 4

SEM image and XRD analysis. (a) Top-view SEM image of the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3 film and (b) the XRD analysis of the prepared (CH3NH3)PbI3 film.

To study the light absorption properties of the prepared ITO/CuInS2(n) and ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3 films for application in photovoltaic devices, light absorption studies are carried out. Figure 5 shows the UV–vis absorption spectra of the ITO/CuInS2(1) and ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3 films (n = 1, 2, and 3). As shown in Figure 5, the ITO/CuInS2(1) film has light absorption at wavelengths below 825 nm, which is similar to the reported results [10, 31, 32]. After the (CH3NH3)PbI3 film was deposited on the ITO/CuInS2(1) film, the absorbance of the spectra of the ITO/CuInS2(1)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3 film increases significantly in the UV region as well as the visible region. For the ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3 films after other spin-cast cycles (n = 2 and 3) in our experiments, similar results are also obtained, which can be attributed to the light absorption of the deposited (CH3NH3)PbI3 film. Moreover, for the ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3 films, Figure 5 also illustrates that the light absorbance was enhanced with an increase in spin-cast cycle number n, indicating an increased deposition amount of CuInS2. In addition, the absorption lines of the ITO/CuInS2/(CH3NH3)PbI3 films are very similar to those of the reported FTO/TiO2/(CH3NH3)PbI3 films [33], which further confirms the formation of (CH3NH3)PbI3 film and shows the potential of the ITO/CuInS2/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3 films in photovoltaic application.
Figure 5

UV–vis absorption spectra of the ITO/CuInS 2 (1) and ITO/CuInS 2 ( n )/Al 2 O 3 /(CH 3 NH 3 )PbI 3 films ( n =1, 2, and 3).

The J-V characteristics of the ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag solar cells under simulated AM 1.5 G solar irradiation and in the dark are shown in Figure 6. All device parameters under the light illumination, the open-circuit voltage (Voc), the short-circuit photocurrent (Jsc), the fill factor (FF), and the solar power conversion efficiency (η), extracted from the J-V characteristics are summarized in Table 1. For the ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cells, with the increase of CuInS2 deposition number n from 1 to 2, the Jsc increased from 8.85 to 9.92 mA/cm2, the Voc increased from 0.74 to 0.76 V, the FF increased from 0.51 to 0.70, and the η increased from 3.31% to 5.30%. These results might be caused by the voids in the CuInS2 film. As shown in Figure 2a, some voids have been found in the ITO/CuInS2(1) film. When the (CH3NH3)PbI3 precursor solution was spin-cast onto the ITO/CuInS2(1)/Al2O3 film, these voids might be filled by the (CH3NH3)PbI3 precursor solution. Therefore, similar to the observed phenomenon in the mesoporous-TiO2/(CH3NH3)PbI3 film, the (CH3NH3)PbI3 probably infiltrated to the bottom of the CuInS2 film and had a contact with the hole collection electrode (i.e., the ITO electrode), which will enhance the probability of recombination between electrons in the (CH3NH3)PbI3 and holes in the ITO in the ITO/CuInS2(1)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag solar cell. In contrast, as shown in Figure 2c, there are few voids in the ITO/CuInS2(2) film, which may effectively reduce the charge recombination at the ITO/(CH3NH3)PbI3 interface in the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag solar cell. This explanation is supported by the J-V characteristics of the ITO/CuInS2(n)/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag in the dark (Figure 6) since the charge recombination can be typically represented by the dark current [2, 34, 35]. It can be observed that the dark current density of the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell is lower than that of the ITO/CuInS2(1)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell, which indicates that the charge recombination is reduced in the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell.
Figure 6

J - V characteristics. J-V characteristics of the ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag solar cells under simulated AM 1.5G solar irradiation and in the dark (n = 1, 2, and 3).

Table 1

Summary of device performance under white light illumination with an intensity of 100 mW/cm 2


V oc (V)



PCE (%)
















However, the device performance of the ITO/CuInS2 (n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell decreased as the CuInS2 deposition number n increased further from 2 to 3. It can be found from Table 1 that, compared to the ITO/CuInS2 (2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3) PbI3/Ag cell, all device parameters (Jsc, FF, and η) except Voc of the ITO/CuInS2(3)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3) PbI3/Ag cell decreased. For the ITO/CuInS2 (3)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell, the Jsc, FF, and η decreased to 8.98 mA/cm2, 0.38, and 2.60%, respectively. The main reason for the decreased device performance may be the increased thickness of CuInS2 film. As shown in Figure 1, in the ITO/CuInS2/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell, the CuInS2 mainly conducted holes. Therefore, increasing the thickness of CuInS2 film would increase the hole-transfer resistance and lead to an increase in overall series resistance (Rs) in the cells, which would inevitably lead to the degradation of Jsc and FF. The Rs can be calculated from the inverse slope of the illuminated J-V characteristics at J = 0. The Rs values for the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag and ITO/CuInS2(3)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cells are 6.4 and 29.6 Ω/cm2, respectively, which were calculated from the illuminated J-V characteristics (shown in Figure 6). Obviously, compared to the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell, the Rs of ITO/CuInS2(3)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell increased due to the increased thickness of the CuInS2 film. Furthermore, a too thick CuInS2 film may dramatically reduce the amount of light absorbed by the (CH3NH3)PbI3 film, which results in a sizeable reduction in the number of the photo-generated electrons in the (CH3NH3)PbI3 film and therefore reduces the Jsc and FF.

Figure 7 shows the IPCE spectra of the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag solar cell. It can be observed that the solar cell shows a spectral response in the almost entire wavelength region from 370 to 1,000 nm. The IPCE of over 31% is observed at a wavelength range from 370 to 750 nm. Furthermore, for the IPCE value, a sharp decrease in the wavelength region from 750 to 820 nm is observed. The threshold wavelength of 820 nm is related to the bandgap of about 1.5 eV for (CH3NH3)PbI3[36]. These results are in agreement with the previously reported IPCE spectra for the perovskite solar cells without a CuInS2 layer [19, 36, 37]. It should be noted that, for these reported perovskite solar cells, the IPCE values are nearly zero in the long wavelength region (820 to 1,000 nm). However, in our case, IPCE of over 9% is observed at an entire wavelength range from 820 to 1,000 nm, resulting from the photocurrent originating from the CuInS2 layer. Therefore, the CuInS2 layer can improve the IPCE values of the solar cells in the long wavelength region.
Figure 7

IPCE spectra of the ITO/CuInS 2 ( 2 )/Al 2 O 3 /(CH 3 NH 3 )PbI 3 /Ag solar cell.

Our experimental results demonstrated that, for the ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cells, the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell showed the highest solar power conversion efficiency of 5.30%. However, it should be noted that the highest power conversion efficiency presented here was just taken from the solar cells with a simplified architecture. The solar cell architecture can be further optimized. For example, a hole-selective layer can be inserted between the ITO and the CuInS2 layers to reduce the charge recombination at the ITO/CuInS2 interface. Similarly, inserting an electron-selective layer between the (CH3NH3)PbI3 layer and the Ag electrode may also suppress the charge recombination at the (CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag interface. Therefore, the solar cells with an architecture that incorporates the charge (hole or electron)-selective layer may achieve higher power conversion efficiency, which is our future study.


In summary, the solution-processed (CH3NH3)PbI3 perovskite/CuInS2 planar heterojunction solar cells with a Al2O3 scaffold have been successfully fabricated, in which the CuInS2 films as both the light harvester and hole transporter were prepared at a relatively low temperature (250°C) via a simple solution-based chemical approach to replace the commonly used n-type TiO2 layer. The influence of the thickness of CuInS2 film on the performance of the fabricated ITO/CuInS2/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag solar cells was investigated. Our experimental results demonstrated that an optimum power conversion efficiency of up to 5.30% can be achieved by the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag cell. Optimizing the device architecture may further improve the performance of the ITO/CuInS2(n)/Al2O3/(CH3NH3)PbI3/Ag solar cells. The present research findings offer a new approach to achieve low-cost and high-efficiency solar cells.



This work was supported by the Henan University Distinguished Professor Startup Fund, Natural Science Foundation of Henan University (2013YBZR046), National Natural Science Foundation of China-Talent Training Fund of Henan (U1404616), and Seed Fund of Young Scientific Research Talents of Henan University (0000A40540).

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Physics and Electronics, Henan University
People’s Republic of China and Henan Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Materials, Henan University
Institute of Modern Physics and School of Science, Huzhou Normal University


  1. Suryawanshi MP, Agawane GL, Bhosale SM, Shin SW, Patil PS, Kim JH, Moholkar AV: CZTS based thin film solar cells: a status review. Mater Technol 2013, 28: 98–109. 10.1179/1753555712Y.0000000038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkhouse DAR, Gunawan O, Gokmen T, Todorov TK, Mitzi DB: Device characteristics of a 10.1% hydrazine-processed Cu2ZnSn(Se, S)4 solar cell. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 2012, 20: 6–11. 10.1002/pip.1160View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Greätzel M, Janssen RAJ, Mitzi DB, Sargent EH: Materials interface engineering for solution-processed photovoltaics. Nature 2012, 488: 304–312. 10.1038/nature11476View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang LY, Lunt RR, Brown PR, Bulovic V, Bawendi MG: Low-temperature solution-processed solar cells based on PbS colloidal quantum Dot/CdS heterojunctions. Nano Lett 2013, 13: 994–999. 10.1021/nl3041417View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Rath AK, Bernechea M, Martinez L, de Arquer FPG, Osmond J, Konstantatos G: Solution-processed inorganic bulk nano-heterojunctions and their application to solar cells. Nat Photonics 2012, 6: 529–534. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.139View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Tian YY, Zhang YJ, Lin YZ, Gao K, Zhang YP, Liu KY, Yang QQ, Zhou X, Qin DH, Wu HB, Xia YX, Hou LT, Lan LF, Chen JW, Wang D, Yao RH: Solution-processed efficient CdTe nanocrystal/CBD-CdS hetero-junction solar cells with ZnO interlayer. J Nanopart Res 2013, 15: 2053.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gur I, Fromer NA, Geier ML, Alivisatos AP: Air-stable all-inorganic nanocrystal solar cells processed from solution. Science 2005, 310: 462–465. 10.1126/science.1117908View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gur I, Fromer NA, Chen CP, Kanaras AG, Alivisatos AP: Hybrid solar cells with prescribed nanoscale morphologies based on hyperbranched semiconductor nanocrystals. Nano Lett 2007, 7: 409–414. 10.1021/nl062660tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Azimi H, Heumuller T, Gerl A, Matt G, Kubis P, Distaso M, Ahmad R, Akdas T, Richter M, Peukert W, Brabec CJ: Relation of nanostructure and recombination dynamics in a Low-temperature solution-processed CuInS2 nanocrystalline solar cell. Adv Energ Mater 2013, 3: 1589–1596. 10.1002/aenm.201300449View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Li L, Coates N, Moses D: Solution-processed inorganic solar cell based on in situ synthesis and film deposition of CuInS2 nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132: 22–23. 10.1021/ja908371fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Todorov T, Sugimoto H, Gunawan O, Gokmen T, Mitzi DB: High-efficiency devices with pure solution-processed Cu2ZnSn(S, Se) (4) absorbers. IEEE J Photovolt 2014, 4: 483–485.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hodes G: Perovskite-based solar cells. Science 2013, 342: 317–318. 10.1126/science.1245473View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Xing GC, Mathews N, Sun SY, Lim SS, Lam YM, Grätzel M, Mhaisalkar S, Sum TC: Long-range balanced electron- and hole-transport lengths in organic–inorganic CH3NH3PbI3. Science 2013, 342: 344–347. 10.1126/science.1243167View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Stranks SD, Eperon GE, Grancini G, Menelaou C, Alcocer MJP, Leijtens T, Herz LM, Petrozza A, Snaith HJ: Electron–hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science 2013, 342: 341–344. 10.1126/science.1243982View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim HS, Lee CR, Im JH, Lee KB, Moehl T, Marchioro A, Moon SJ, Humphry-Baker R, Yum JH, Moser JE, Grätzel M, Park NG: Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all-solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9%. Sci Rep UK 2012, 2: 591.Google Scholar
  16. Lee MM, Teuscher J, Miyasaka T, Murakami TN, Snaith HJ: Efficient hybrid solar cells based on meso-superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science 2012, 338: 643–647. 10.1126/science.1228604View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Burschka J, Pellet N, Moon S-J, Humphry-Baker R, Gao P, Nazeeruddin MK, Gräetzel M: Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 2013, 499: 316–319. 10.1038/nature12340View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Heo JH, Im SH, Noh JH, Mandal TN, Lim CS, Chang JA, Lee YH, Kim HJ, Sarkar A, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M, Seok SI: Efficient inorganic–organic hybrid heterojunction solar cells containing perovskite compound and polymeric hole conductors. Nat Photonics 2013, 7: 487–492.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Abrusci A, Stranks SD, Docampo P, Yip HL, Jen AKY, Snaith HJ: High-performance perovskite-polymer hybrid solar cells via electronic coupling with fullerene monolayers. Nano Lett 2013, 13: 3124–3128. 10.1021/nl401044qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Park NG: Organometal perovskite light absorbers toward a 20% efficiency low-cost solid-state mesoscopic solar cell. J Phys Chem Lett 2013, 4: 2423–2429. 10.1021/jz400892aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu MZ, Johnston MB, Snaith HJ: Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition. Nature 2013, 501: 395–398. 10.1038/nature12509View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Etgar L, Gao P, Xue ZS, Peng Q, Chandiran AK, Liu B, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M: Mesoscopic CH3NH3PbI3/TiO2 heterojunction solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134: 17396–17399. 10.1021/ja307789sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ball JM, Lee MM, Hey A, Snaith HJ: Low-temperature processed meso-superstructured to thin-film perovskite solar cells. Energ Environ Sci 2013, 6: 1739–1743. 10.1039/c3ee40810hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Carnie MJ, Charbonneau C, Davies ML, Troughton J, Watson TM, Wojciechowski K, Snaith H, Worsley DA: A one-step low temperature processing route for organolead halide perovskite solar cells. Chem Commun 2013, 49: 7893–7895. 10.1039/c3cc44177fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar MH, Yantara N, Dharani S, Gräetzel M, Mhaisalkar S, Boix PP, Mathews N: Flexible, low-temperature, solution processed ZnO-based perovskite solid state solar cells. Chem Commun (Camb) 2013, 49: 11089–11091. 10.1039/c3cc46534aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Chung I, Lee B, He JQ, Chang RPH, Kanatzidis MG: All-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with high efficiency. Nature 2012, 485: U486-U494. 10.1038/nature11067View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Tell B, Shay JL, Kasper HM: Electrical properties, optical properties, and band structure of CuGaS2 and CuInS2. Phys Rev Biol 1971, 4: 2463–2471. 10.1103/PhysRevB.4.2463View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Li TL, Teng HS: Solution synthesis of high-quality CuInS2 quantum dots as sensitizers for TiO2 photoelectrodes. J Mater Chem 2010, 20: 3656–3664. 10.1039/b927279hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Shi L, Yin PQ, Wang LB, Qian YT: Fabrication of single-crystalline CuInS2 nanowires array via a diethylenetriamine-thermal route. Crystengcomm 2012, 14: 7217–7221. 10.1039/c2ce25368bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Baikie T, Fang YN, Kadro JM, Schreyer M, Wei FX, Mhaisalkar SG, Gräetzel M, White TJ: Synthesis and crystal chemistry of the hybrid perovskite (CH3NH3) PbI3 for solid-state sensitised solar cell applications. J Mater Chem A 2013, 1: 5628–5641.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhou ZJ, Fan JQ, Wang X, Sun WZ, Zhou WH, Du ZL, Wu SX: Solution fabrication and photoelectrical properties of CuInS2 nanocrystals on TiO2 nanorod array. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 2011, 3: 2189–2194. 10.1021/am200500kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen C, Ali G, Yoo SH, Kum JM, Cho SO: Improved conversion efficiency of CdS quantum dot-sensitized TiO2 nanotube-arrays using CuInS2 as a co-sensitizer and an energy barrier layer. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 16430–16435. 10.1039/c1jm13616jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Im J-H, Lee C-R, Lee J-W, Park S-W, Park N-G: 6.5% efficient perovskite quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell. Nanoscale 2011, 3: 4088–4093. 10.1039/c1nr10867kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Na SI, Kim TS, Oh SH, Kim J, Kim SS, Kim DY: Enhanced performance of inverted polymer solar cells with cathode interfacial tuning via water-soluble polyfluorenes. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 223305. 10.1063/1.3522893View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Belghachi A: Perimeter recombination in thin film solar cells. J Comput Electron 2007, 6: 279–283. 10.1007/s10825-006-0123-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim HS, Lee JW, Yantara N, Boix PP, Kulkarni SA, Mhaisalkar S, Gräetzel M, Park NG: High efficiency solid-state sensitized solar cell-based on submicrometer rutile TiO2 nanorod and CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite sensitizer. Nano Lett 2013, 13: 2412–2417. 10.1021/nl400286wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Jeng JY, Chiang YF, Lee MH, Peng SR, Guo TF, Chen P, Wen TC: CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite/fullerene planar-heterojunction hybrid solar cells. Adv Mater 2013, 25: 3727–3732. 10.1002/adma.201301327View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Chen et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.