Open Access

A CCD-based reader combined with CdS quantum dot-labeled lateral flow strips for ultrasensitive quantitative detection of CagA

Nanoscale Research Letters20149:57

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-57

Received: 12 November 2013

Accepted: 19 January 2014

Published: 4 February 2014


Immunochromatographic assays are widely used to detect many analytes. CagA is proved to be associated closely with initiation of gastric carcinoma. Here, we reported that a charge-coupled device (CCD)-based test strip reader combined with CdS quantum dot-labeled lateral flow strips for quantitative detection of CagA was developed, which used 365-nm ultraviolet LED as the excitation light source, and captured the test strip images through an acquisition module. Then, the captured image was transferred to the computer and was processed by a software system. A revised weighted threshold histogram equalization (WTHE) image processing algorithm was applied to analyze the result. CdS quantum dot-labeled lateral flow strips for detection of CagA were prepared. One hundred sera samples from clinical patients with gastric cancer and healthy people were prepared for detection, which demonstrated that the device could realize rapid, stable, and point-of-care detection, with a sensitivity of 20 pg/mL.


Test strip reader CCD Revised WTHE algorithm CdS quantum dots CagA


Up to date, lateral flow tests, also called lateral flow immunochromatographic assays, have been widely used in qualitative and semiquantitative detection of biomarkers. This technology utilizes antigen-antibody reaction features to detect numbers of analytes, including antigens, antibodies, and even the products of nucleic acid amplification tests [1, 2]. They have merits of user-friendly format, rapid detection, long-term stability, and relatively low cost [3, 4]. However, most colloidal gold lateral flow tests are analyzed by naked eyes, which is subjective and inaccurate. For these reasons, many groups have engaged in developing novel labeling materials to replace colloidal gold. Quantum dots (QDs), one kind of novel nanomaterial, are composed of periodic groups of II-IV, III-V, or IV-VI semiconductor material. Quantum dots have many advantages compared with colloidal gold, such as high fluorescent intensity, broad absorption spectra, narrow and symmetric emission bands, and excellent stability [512]. On the other hand, most lateral flow tests could only implement qualitative detection. In order to realize quantitative detection, some groups [1317] have dedicated to this issue. Huang et al. [2] utilized a photomultiplier tube (PMT) as a signal acquisition device for up-conversion of nanoparticle-labeled test strips. Although PMT has high sensitivity, it is with a limited surveyed area. Mei's group [1] chose a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor to capture test strip images. Besides, our group [18] employed a charge-coupled device (CCD) with an image acquisition card as an image sensor to capture test strip images. However, the image acquisition limited the application of this instrument and, at the same time, resulted in complexity and high cost. In this article, an improved test strip reader is presented.

Gastric carcinoma is one of the common malignant tumors in the world [19]. Its morbidity and mortality, respectively, rank second and third among all malignant tumors. Nevertheless, only 10% or so patients were diagnosed with early gastric cancer (EGC) in China. Moreover, compared with ones suffering with late gastric cancer, patients with EGC have a higher survival rate [20], so early diagnosis of gastric carcinoma is of great importance. It is confirmed that Helicobacter pylori with cytotoxin-associated protein (CagA) is closely associated with gastric carcinoma's initiation and development [2123]. If we could detect CagA as soon as possible, we might decrease or avoid development of gastric carcinoma via reasonable therapy. To realize this goal, we designed and prepared the device for ultrasensitive detection of CagA.

Herein, we reported that an improved CCD-based test strip reader was designed and developed. Besides, a corresponding software system was also developed for human-machine interaction. According to the CCD image sensor, test strip images were captured and then transmitted to the control computer. Afterward, the software system would finish the data analysis and present diagnostic results in the form of reports, which is a convenient diagnostic system for clinical physicians.

Materials and methods

Composition of test strips

The immunochromatographic test strip (ITS) is composed of a sample pad, conjugation pad, nitrocellulose membrane, and absorption pad, as shown in Figure 1a. All these components are fixed onto a plastic backing card [5]. During the assay, the liquid sample is added onto the sample pad, and then the absorption pad wicks the liquid sample to the end of the test strip through capillarity. Analytes in the sample will combine with conjugates (labeled with CdSe quantum dots) in the conjugation pad. Subsequently, the formed complexes continue migrating along the membrane until they are captured by the test line (T-line). The residual will move forward and be captured in the control line (C-line). In this study, all the test strips were prepared by using the method reported by our group [7, 18].
Figure 1

Images of a test strip. (a) Structure of a test strip. (b) Photo of a QD test strip under a UV lamp.

Design of the hardware system

The CCD-based test strip reader was composed of six modules, including a light source module, sample module, power module, acquisition module, radiator module, and PC module. The structure is displayed in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Structure of the CCD-based test strip reader.

A quadrate ultraviolet LED as excitation light source was to make sure that samples accept the same amount of irradiation. It is also critical to select a good optical sensor. Photodiode, photomultiplier tube, linear CCDs, and image sensors are widely used optical sensors. However, photodiode, photomultiplier tube, and linear CCDs have a limited surveyed area. On the contrary, image sensors could provide a more flexible and wider detection area. Moreover, image sensors could realize short time detection [1]. Based on the above benefits, we decided to employ an image sensor. CCD and CMOS are two most popularly used image sensors. Compared with CMOS, CCD has the advantages of low noise and better imaging quality [24], so a color CCD image sensor was chosen. This digital CCD image sensor with a USB not only solved the problem of employing an image acquisition card but also provided stable and rapid data transmission.

The QD test strip was irradiated by an excitation light source and then produced fluorescence, which could be captured by the CCD image sensor. The captured image was transmitted to the computer and went through further processing to complete calculation of test results. In order to decrease background interference, an ultraviolet filter was added to resist the excitation light source. A lithium battery was adopted as power supply, providing a light source for places without electric supply.

Development of the software system

We also developed a suitable software system to give physicians easier access to our device. The software system was programmed in a Visual C++ development environment and provided main functions of processing test strip images, analysis, and diagnosis. Furthermore, the software system could be connected to a database and a printer for data storage or report printing. The flow diagram of the software system is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3

Flow diagram of the software system.

In test strip images, the useful information was only T-line and C-line. However, there always existed intense background noise that requires to be separated. Therefore, an appropriate algorithm was proposed to reach this goal.

A revised weighted threshold histogram equalization (WTHE) algorithm was proposed. The WTHE contrast enhancement algorithm was first put forward by Qing and Ward [25]. In our study, this method was applied with some modification. By observation, the component R of red-green-blue (RGB) test strip images has an obvious difference between foreground and background. To indicate the advantage of component R, a comparison is shown. Figure 4 displays the results, from which it is obvious that the background in the component R image was lower than that in the RGB image. Hence, the mentioned contrast enhancement algorithm would be acted on the component R of test strip images. The procedure of the proposed algorithm is listed below.
Figure 4

Comparison between RGB and component R. (a) Curve graph in RGB. (b) Curve graph in component R.

Consider an image with N pixels and a gray level range of [0, K − 1].
  1. 1.

    Calculate the average gray value of all pixels named T. Then, scan all the pixels. These pixels’ value smaller than T will decrease a constant C.

  2. 2.

    Calculate the probability density function (PDF) P(k). P(k) = n k /N, k = 0,1…, K − 1, where n k is the number of pixels with gray level k.

  3. 3.

    Compute an upper limit P u and a lower limit P l with great importance. P u = v · P max, where P max is the highest probability value and v represents the upper threshold normalized to P max (v belongs between 0 and 1). P l is a fixed value, which filters some very low probability values. Herein, P l was set as 0.1%.

  4. 4.

    Define the new PDF. P n k = P u , if P k > P u P k P l P u P l r · P u , if P l P k P u 0 , if P k < P l . This step will remove very low probability pixels and limit very high probability pixels (background pixels).

  5. 5.

    Calculate the cumulative distribution function C n(k). C n k = m = 0 k P n m .

  6. 6.

    Obtain the output image. O(N) = n · W out · C n(k), where W out is equal to the biggest value subtracting the smallest value and n represents the number of superposition.



Characterization of CdSe QDs

All the CdSe QDs were prepared by our group's member [7, 18, 2629]. The absorption and emission spectrogram is displayed in Figure 5a. The emission wavelength was approximately 625 nm. The HR-TEM pictures (Figure 5b) show that the water-soluble CdSe QDs have a diameter of 5.4 nm. The digital photos of the QD-labeled anti-CagA antibody before and after UV condition are shown in Figure 5c.
Figure 5

Characterization of CdSe QDs. (a) Absorption and emission spectrogram. (b) TEM picture of synthesized CdSe QDs. (c) Digital photos of the QD-labeled anti-CagA antibody before and after UV condition.

Hardware units

Figure 6 shows each component of the device. Figure 6a shows the CCD image sensor with a volume of 29 × 29 × 29 m3. Figure 6c,d represents the excitation light source and the integrated instrument, respectively. Compared with the use of the card acquisition card, that of the CCD image sensor with a USB is more convenient and has less cost. The UV filter is displayed in Figure 6b and could be connected with the CCD image sensor, playing an important role in eliminating interference of the light source. In addition, employing a lithium battery made the device viable without power supply for more than 6 h.
Figure 6

Hardware units of the device. (a) CCD image sensor. (b) UV filter. (c) Excitation light source. (d) Integrated instrument.

Image processing results

Figure 1b displays a photo of the QD test strip under the irradiation of ultraviolet light. Obviously, C-line and T-line emitted fluorescence. However, this photo was taken without a UV filter, containing a strong background caused by the excitation light source. As a comparison, Figure 5a presents a QD lateral flow strip picture with a UV filter, which accepted little influence of the excitation light source, demonstrating that the UV filter is essential. Though the effect of the excitation light source was eliminated, the fluorescent intensity was also weak in detecting a low-concentration sample (Figure 7a). The proper image enhancement algorithm played a critical role. In order to display our method's superiority, traditional HE and WTHE algorithms were compared with the proposed algorithm (Figure 7). Figure 7b,c shows test strip images after processing of the traditional HE and WTHE algorithms, respectively. The test strip image processed by the proposed modified WTHE algorithm is shown in Figure 7d. By comparing this method with other image enhancement algorithms, the results indicated that the proposed algorithm could produce a satisfying effect with distinguishing C-line and T-line from the background.
Figure 7

Images of test strip. (a) Original test strip image.(b) Test strip image with traditional HE. (c) Test strip image with WTHE. (d) Test strip image with proposed algorithm.

During processing, we set v = 0.1 and r = 0.4, with the least mean square error (MSE). After image processing, the distinct graph of T-line and C-line is displayed in Figure 8 to certify the effectiveness of this algorithm.
Figure 8

Curve figure of the test strip image after processing of the proposed modified WTHE algorithm.

Diagnosis of CagA samples

In order to test the device, 50 positive and 50 negative CagA samples from a clinical hospital were collected for detection. The outcomes showed that the instrument could realize detection with a specificity of 98% and a sensitivity of 96%. The specificity and sensitivity are calculated according to the following equations, respectively:
Specificity = True negative True negative + False positive
Specificity = True negative True positive + False negative
Compared with naked eye detection, the device could recognize low-concentration samples by employing the proposed image processing algorithm, thus greatly enhancing sensitivity. Additionally, in order to improve specificity, more samples could be detected to set a more exact threshold. To eliminate the error introduced by the differences between test strips and samples, we used HCG samples to set a threshold of T/C ratio to determine the specification. The more antigen targeting in the sample, the more QD conjugates would be captured on the test line, which leads to the increase of the T/C ratio. According to the principle described above, the T/C ratio would be proportional to the concentration of CagA in the samples. Compared to the bare detection of the test line, this quantitative approach is much more credible and applicable. Besides, seven CagA samples with different concentration were also prepared by our group. From Figure 9, the relationship of T/C and concentrations could be represented by a fitting function. As the concentration increases, the value of T/C reaches the capacity. The device realized quantitative detection with a sensitivity of 20 pg/mL.
Figure 9

Graph of T/C in different concentrations.


In conclusion, a CCD-based reader was designed and fabricated, the quantitative analysis software was compiled, and the resultant CCD-based reader system was used for quantitative analysis of examined CagA antigen on the strips. A fluorescence detection system of lateral flow strip was developed. A revised WTHE algorithm was used to enhance captured QD test strip images. Practical results indicated that the system could quickly and accurately detect the fluorescence signal. QD lateral flow tests were used with different concentrations to detect CagA samples and indicated that the sensitivity of this device was 20 pg/mL. For a future study, test strips with multilines could be detected and some wireless technologies could also be applied in similar instruments. More nanoparticles could be applied for improving sensitivity, which is also a big issue.

Authors’ information

DC is a professor of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. His research interests include the synthesis of nanomaterials and their application in the biomedical field. KW is a lecturer of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Her scientific interests are nanotechnology development of early cancer detection and screening equipment, nonmaterial molecular imaging, and biocompatibility evaluation. CL is a PhD candidate of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. XD and CG are both master students of Shanghai Jiao Tong University.



We are grateful for the financial support by the Chinese 973 Project (2010CB933902 and 2011CB933100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81101169, 81225010, and 81327002), Shanghai Science and Technology Fund (13 nm1401500 and 11 nm0504200), Important National Science and Technology Specific Projects(2009ZX10004-311), and 863 High-Tech Project of China (2012AA0022703).

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, Key Laboratory for Thin Film and Microfabrication of Ministry of Education, Institute of Micro/Nano Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Research Institute of Translation Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University


  1. Mei JC, Ye Q, Zhou WY: Development and study of lateral flow test strip reader based on embedded system. In 2011 10th International Conference on Electronic Measurement &Instruments (ICEMI): 16–19 Aug 2011; Chengdu. Piscataway: IEEE; 2011:201–204.Google Scholar
  2. Huang LH, Zhou L, Zhang YB: A simple optical reader for upconverting phosphor particles captured on lateral flow strip. Sensors Journal, IEEE 2009, 9: 1185–1191.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Shyu RH, Shyu HF, Liu HW: Colloidal gold-based immunochromatographic assay for detection of ricin. Toxicon 2002, 40: 255–258. 10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00193-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu G, Lin YY, Wang J: Disposable electrochemical immunosensor diagnosis device based on nanoparticle probe and immunochromatographic strip. Anal Chem 2007, 79: 7644–7653. 10.1021/ac070691iView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Li Z, Wang Y, Wang J: Rapid and sensitive detection of protein biomarker using a portable fluorescence biosensor based on quantum dots and a lateral flow test strip. Anal Chem 2010, 82: 7008–7014. 10.1021/ac101405aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Esteve-Turrillas FA, Abad-Fuentes A: Applications of quantum dots as probes in immunosensing of small-sized analytes. Biosens Bioelectron 2013, 41: 12–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yang H, Guo Q, He R: A quick and parallel analytical method based on quantum dots labeling for to RCH-related antibodies. Nanoscale Res Lett 2009, 4: 1469–1474. 10.1007/s11671-009-9422-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cui DX, Huang P, Wang K: Real time PCR based on fluorescent quenching of mercaptoacetic acid-modified CdTe quantum dots for ultrasensitive specific detection of nucleic acids. Nano Biomedicine Engineering 2010, 2: 45–55.Google Scholar
  9. Zou Z, Du D, Wang J: Quantum dot-based immunochromatographic fluorescent biosensor for biomonitoring trichloropyridinol, a biomarker of exposure to chlorpyrifos. Anal Chem 2010, 82: 5125–5133. 10.1021/ac100260mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Michalet X, Pinaud FF, Bentolila LA: Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science 2005, 307: 538–544. 10.1126/science.1104274View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang C, You X, Fu HL: Fluoroimmunoassay for antigen based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer between quantum dots and gold nanoparticles. Nano Biomedicine Engineering 2013, 5: 121–124.Google Scholar
  12. Xu M, Li Z, Zhu X: Hydrothermal/solvothermal synthesis of graphene quantum dots and their biological applications. Nano Biomedicine Engineering 2013, 5: 65–71.Google Scholar
  13. Song C, Zhi A, Liu Q: Rapid and sensitive detection of β-agonists using a portable fluorescence biosensor based on fluorescent nanosilica and a lateral flow test strip. Biosens Bioelectron 2013, 50: 62–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. You DJ, Park TS, Yoon JY: Cell-phone-based measurement of TSH using Mie scatter optimized lateral flow assays. Biosens Bioelectron 2013, 40: 180–185. 10.1016/j.bios.2012.07.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee S, Kim G, Moon J: Performance improvement of the one-dot lateral flow immunoassay for aflatoxin B1 by using a smartphone-based reading system. Sensors 2013, 13: 5109–5116. 10.3390/s130405109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gonzalez J, Foley M, Bieber N: Development of an ultrasensitive immunochromatography test to detect nicotine metabolites in oral fluids. Anal Bioanal Chem 2011, 400: 3655–3664. 10.1007/s00216-011-5051-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Li L, Zhou L, Huang LH: CCD-based detection system for immunity-chromatography test strip. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument 2007, 28: 246–251.Google Scholar
  18. Zhang XQ, Li D, Wang C: A CCD-based reader combined quantum dots-labeled lateral flow strips for ultrasensitive quantitative detection of anti-HBs antibody. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2012, 8: 372–379. 10.1166/jbn.2012.1401View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang L, Zhu H, Wei B: Construction, structural modeling of a novel ScFv against human gastric cancer from phage-display library. Nano Biomedicine Engineering 2011, 3: 29–33.Google Scholar
  20. Hyung WJ, Noh SH, Lee JH: Early gastric carcinoma with signet ring cell histology. Cancer 2002, 94: 78–83. 10.1002/cncr.10120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Rudi J, Kolb C, Maiwald M: Serum antibodies against Helicobacter pylori proteins VacA and CagA are associated with increased risk for gastric adenocarcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 1997, 42: 1652–1659. 10.1023/A:1018849112533View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Minohara Y, Boyd DK, Hawkins HK: The effect of the cag pathogenicity island on binding of Helicobacter pylori to gastric epithelial cells and the subsequent induction of apoptosis. Helicobacter 2007, 12: 583–590. 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00537.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chung W, Jung S, Lee KM: The detection of Helicobacter pylori cag pathogenicity islands (PAIs) and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) in gastric epithelial dysplasia and intramucosal cancer. Gastric Cancer 2010, 13: 162–169. 10.1007/s10120-010-0552-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang ZL, Liu JY, Jia YD: Image sensing technology based on CCD and CMOS. Optical Technique 2003, 29: 361–364.Google Scholar
  25. Qing W, Ward RK: Fast image/video contrast enhancement based on weighted thresholded histogram equalization. Consumer Electronics, IEEE Transactions on 2007, 53: 757–764.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Pan BF, Gao F, He R, Cui DX, Zhang YF: Study on interaction between poly(amidoamine) dendrimer and CdSe nanocrystal in chloroform. J Colloid Interface Sci 2006, 297: 151–156. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.09.068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Han MY, Gao XHNSM: Quantum-dot-tagged microbeads for multiplexed optical coding of biomolecules. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19: 631–635. 10.1038/90228View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Maria TF, Aleksey Y, Ralph AS: Synthesis and characterization of polymer-coated quantum dots with integrated acceptor dyes as FRET-based nanoprobes. Nano Lett 2007, 7: 2613–2617. 10.1021/nl070971dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Bailon RS, Alamo NL, Perales PO: Synthesis and surface functionalization of water-soluble quantum dots. Curr Nanosci 2012, 8: 202–207. 10.2174/157341312800167713View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Gui et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.