Seed/catalyst-free vertical growth of high-density electrodeposited zinc oxide nanostructures on a single-layer graphene

  • Nur Suhaili Abd Aziz1,

    Affiliated with

    • Mohamad Rusop Mahmood2,

      Affiliated with

      • Kanji Yasui3 and

        Affiliated with

        • Abdul Manaf Hashim1, 4Email author

          Affiliated with

          Nanoscale Research Letters20149:95

          DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-95

          Received: 29 December 2013

          Accepted: 10 February 2014

          Published: 26 February 2014


          We report the seed/catalyst-free vertical growth of high-density electrodeposited ZnO nanostructures on a single-layer graphene. The absence of hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA) and heat has resulted in the formation of nanoflake-like ZnO structure. The results show that HMTA and heat are needed to promote the formation of hexagonal ZnO nanostructures. The applied current density plays important role in inducing the growth of ZnO on graphene as well as in controlling the shape, size, and density of ZnO nanostructures. High density of vertically aligned ZnO nanorods comparable to other methods was obtained. The quality of the ZnO nanostructures also depended strongly on the applied current density. The growth mechanism was proposed. According to the growth timing chart, the growth seems to involve two stages which are the formation of ZnO nucleation and the enhancement of the vertical growth of nanorods. ZnO/graphene hybrid structure provides several potential applications in electronics and optoelectronics such as photovoltaic devices, sensing devices, optical devices, and photodetectors.


          Electrochemical deposition Graphene Zinc oxide One-dimensional nanostructure


          In recent years, graphene/semiconductor nanocrystal hybrid structure is particularly interesting because nanostructures, such as nanowires, nanorods, nanoneedles, nanosheets and nanowalls, can offer additional functionality to graphene for realizing advanced nanoscale electronics and optoelectronic applications in photovoltaics, nanogenerators, field emission devices, sensitive biological and chemical sensors, and efficient energy conversion and storage devices [15]. This is due to their high aspect ratio, high thermal and mechanical stability, extremely large surface-to-volume ratio, and high porosity [69]. Graphene has a great potential for novel electronic devices because of their extraordinary electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties, including a carrier mobility exceeding 104 cm2/Vs and a thermal conductivity of 103 W/mK [1013]. Therefore, with the excellent electrical and thermal characteristics of graphene layers, growing semiconductor nanostructures and thin films on graphene layers would enable their novel physical properties to be exploited in diverse sophisticated device applications. Recently, several graphene/semiconductor nanocrystals have been successfully synthesized that show desirable combinations of these properties not found in the individual components. One-dimensional zinc oxide (ZnO) semiconducting nanostructures are considered to be important multifunctional building blocks for fabricating various nanodevices [14, 15]. Since graphene is an excellent conductor and a transparent material, the hybrid structure of ZnO/graphene shall lead to several device applications not only on silicon (Si) substrate but also on other insulating substrates such as glass and flexible plastic. Owing to the unique electronic and optical properties of ZnO nanostructures, such hybrid structure can be used for sensing devices [16, 17], ultraviolet (UV) photodetectors [18], solar cells [19], and light-emitting diodes (LED) [20].

          There are several potential methods to grow ZnO on graphene which can be categorized into vapor-phase and liquid-phase methods. The vapor phase method is likely to involve high-temperature process and is also considered as a high-cost method [2, 21]. Also, since the process requires oxygen (O2), the possibility of graphene to be oxidized or etched out during the growth is high since the oxidation of graphene is likely to occur at temperature as low as 450°C [22]. The liquid-phase method seems to be a promising method to grow graphene at low temperature with good controllability in terms of growth rates and structure dimensions.

          Up to date, only two methods have been reported on the growth of seed/catalyst-free ZnO nanostructure on graphene via low-temperature liquid-phase method. Kim et al. reported the growth of ZnO nanorods on graphene without any seed layer by hydrothermal method, but the obtained results show low density of nanostructures [23]. Xu et al. reported the seedless growth of ZnO nanotubes and nanorods on graphene by electrochemical deposition [24, 25]. They reported the growth of highly dense ZnO nanostructures by using solely zinc nitrate as the electrolyte with the introduction of oxidation process of graphene prior to the actual growth. In this paper, we report the seed/catalyst-free vertical growth of ZnO nanostructures on graphene by a single-step cathodic electrochemical deposition method. The term ‘seed/catalyst-free’ refers to the omission of predeposition of ZnO seed layer and any kind of catalyst by other processes. A highly dense vertically aligned ZnO nanostructure on a single-layer (SL) graphene was successfully grown.


          Figure 1a shows the schematic of chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-grown SL graphene on silicon dioxide (SiO2)/Si substrate (Graphene Laboratories Inc., Calverton, NY, USA). The growth of the ZnO nanostructures on graphene/SiO2/Si was carried out by a cathodic electrochemical deposition in 50 mM of zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2 · 6H2O, ≥99.0% purity; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA, C6H12N4, ≥99.0% purity, Sigma-Aldrich). As shown in Figure 1b, platinum (Pt) wire acted as an anode (counter electrode), while the graphene acted as a cathode. Both anode and cathode were connected to the external direct current (DC) power supply. Different current densities of -0.1, -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.0 mA/cm2 were applied. The sample was inserted into the electrolyte from the beginning of the process before this electrolyte was heated up from room temperature (RT) to 80°C. The growth was done for 1 h, counted when the electrolyte temperature reached 80°C or the set temperature (ST). Such temperature was chosen since the effective reaction of zinc nitrate and HMTA takes place at temperature above 80°C. After 1 h, the sample was removed immediately from the electrolyte and quickly rinsed with deionized (DI) water to remove any residue from the surface. The time chart of the growth is shown in Figure 1c. It was confirmed (data is not shown) that the growth without HMTA and heat tend to generate nanoflake-like structure without any one-dimensional (1D) structure. It was shown that HMTA is able to promote the growth of one-dimensional ZnO structure in c-axis [26] by cutting off the access of Zn2+ ions at the sides of the structure, leaving only the polar (001) face to be exposed to Zn2+ ions for further nucleation. As been reported by Kim et al., ZnO nanostructure will not grow on graphene sheets at a growth temperature of 50°C because the activation energy for the nucleation of ZnO nanostructures cannot be achieved at this low temperature [23]. Therefore, higher temperature needs to be applied to achieve the nucleation of ZnO and to increase the hydrolyzation process of HMTA.

          Figure 1

          Schematics and time chart. (a) Schematic of substrate with single-layer graphene, (b) schematic of electrochemical setup, and (c) time chart for electrochemical process.

          The surface morphology, elemental composition, crystallinity, and optical properties of the grown ZnO nanostructures were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray diffractometer (XRD), and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy with excitation at 325 nm of He-Cd laser, respectively.

          Results and discussion

          As comparison, firstly, the hydrothermal growth of ZnO using the same composition of electrolyte and temperature was performed in the same setup. As shown in Figure 2a, the grown ZnO nanostructures are nanorod clusters with very low density, and the structures are not vertically aligned. This is not consistent with the results obtained in [23], probably because the growth was not done in a high-pressure container or autoclave. Next, the growth at the preheated stage, i.e., initial growth, was investigated. The growth was performed in a heated mixture of equimolar of Zn (NO3)2 · 6H2O and HMTA with applied current densities of -0.1, -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.0 mA/cm2. As shown in Figure 2b, c, d, e, f, different morphologies of ZnO nucleation structure were observed. The structures seem to be strongly dependent on the applied current density. At low current density of -0.1 mA/cm2, a very thin ZnO layer containing nanodot structures was obtained (Figure 2b). When the current densities were increased to −0.5 and −1.0 mA/cm2, a ZnO layer with nanoporous-like morphological structures was observed as shown in Figure 2c, d, respectively. The porosity seems to decrease with the increase of current density, where a ZnO layer without porous-like structure was observed at the current density of -1.5 mA/cm2 as shown in Figure 2e. At high current density of -2.0 mA/cm2, a ZnO layer containing nanocluster structures was observed as shown in Figure 2f. The growth of the vertical nanorods based on those formed seed structures is expected to have been enhanced after the ST point or during the actual growth. Since the reaction of electrolyte is considerably premature at temperatures below 80°C, the crystallinity of the seed structure is not good. This is simply proved by the EDX analysis (data is not shown), where the compositional percentage of zinc (Zn) and oxygen (O) is low which is in the range of 50% to 60% in spite of the additional compositional percentage of O from the SiO2 layer.

          Figure 2

          SEM images of ZnO structures. (a) Top-view SEM images of ZnO structures grown at a current density of 0.0 mA/cm2 (hydrothermal). (b)-(f) Top-view and cross-sectional SEM images of the initial ZnO structures grown at current densities of -0.1, -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.0 mA/cm2, respectively.

          Finally, the complete growth (i.e., initial plus actual growth) of the ZnO nanostructures according to the time chart shown in Figure 1c in a heated mixture of equimolar of Zn (NO3)2 · 6H2O and HMTA at applied current densities of -0.1, -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.0 mA/cm2 was carried out. Figure 3a, b, c, d, e shows the top-view and cross-sectional SEM images of the grown structures. It is noted that the grown structures show identical morphologies throughout the whole surface area of the graphene. Again, it can be understood that the morphologies of the grown ZnO structures change significantly according to the applied current density. From the EDX analysis, the compositional percentage of Zn and O at current densities of -0.1, -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.0 mA/cm2 was found to be above 90%. At low current density of -0.1 mA/cm2, a very small density of nanorods was obtained. These nanorods seem to originate from the ZnO nanodots which were formed during the initial growth. The density of the nanorods was drastically increased at the current density of -0.5 mA/cm2 with slight increase in diameter of the nanorod. This is due to the porous-like structures formed during the initial growth which is likely to promote the growth of the nanorods. The same tendency was also reported, where the enhancement of the growth of ZnO nanorods on porous Si was obtained [27]. When the applied current is further increased to -1.0 mA/cm2, the diameter of the nanorods increase drastically, generating almost no space between the nanorods. At the current density of -1.5 mA/cm2, due to the increase in diameter as well as the increase in chemical reaction, the morphology shows no more well-defined hexagonal structure. At the current density of -2.0 mA/cm2, large diameter of rod structure with fairly defined hexagonal shape was observed. These large nanorods seem to originate from the nanoclusters formed during the initial growth. It can be concluded that the shape, diameter, and density of the grown structures are determined by the initial structure formed during the preheated process. Further explanation is presented in the next section, i.e., growth mechanism.

          Figure 3

          Top-view and cross-sectional SEM images of final ZnO nanostructures. The nanostructures were grown at current densities of (a) -0.1 mA/cm2, (b) -0.5 mA/cm2, (c) -1.0 mA/cm2, (d) -1.5 mA/cm2, (e) -2.0 mA/cm2.

          The calculated densities of the nanorods for samples at current densities of -0.1, -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.0 mA/cm2 are estimated to be around 1.84 × 107, 1.37 × 109, 1.24 × 108, 3.42 × 107, and 2.32 × 107 cm2, respectively. The density is 1 order larger than the density of the nanorods grown by the hydrothermal process [23] and in the same order with the estimated nanorods grown by the electrochemical process on oxidized graphene layer [25] for the same range of diameter. The current applied in the electrochemical process seems to induce and promote the growth of ZnO nanorods with high density. Table 1 summarizes the density, diameter, length, and average aspect ratio of the grown ZnO and the comparison with other works. High average aspect ratio of more than 2.3 was obtainable with current densities from -0.1 to -0.5 mA/cm2.
          Table 1

          Density, diameter, length, and average aspect ratio of the grown ZnO nanorods


          Current density (mA/cm2)

          Density (cm2)

          Diameter of nanorods (nm)

          Length of nanorods (nm)

          Average aspect ratio

          This work


          1.84 × 107

          190 to 450

          450 to 1,160



          1.37 × 109

          260 to 480

          840 to 1,160



          1.24 × 108

          660 to 1,000

          150 to 340



          3.42 × 107

          950 to 1,330

          200 to 560



          2.32 × 107

          570 to 2,030

          1,160 to 2,220




          3.00× 107






          5.83× 108

          370 to 780



          Figure 4a shows the XRD spectra of the as-grown ZnO nanorods on the SL graphene at different current densities. The diffraction peaks of ZnO at 31.97°, 34.60°, and 36.42° (ICDD 01-075-1526) were recorded which belong to (010), (002), and (011) planes, respectively. These diffraction peaks show that the grown ZnO nanostructures were having hexagonal wurtzite structure. Furthermore, there was also a weak peak at 33.20° which corresponds to the Si (002) diffraction peak (ICDD 01-080-0018). A relatively high peak intensity of the ZnO (002) plane and relatively low peak intensity of ZnO (011) were observed for the samples grown at the current density of -0.5 mA/cm2, indicating that the preferred growth orientation of the grown ZnO nanorods is towards the c-axis ([001] direction), consistent with the SEM images shown in Figure 3b.

          Figure 4

          XRD and RT PL spectra of the grown nanostructures. (a) XRD spectra and (b) RT PL spectra of the grown ZnO nanostructures at different applied current densities.

          The optical characteristics of the ZnO nanostructures were investigated using RT PL spectroscopy. Figure 4b shows the PL spectra of the ZnO nanostructures deposited on the graphene layers at different current densities. Each RT PL spectrum shows one distinct near-band-edge (NBE) emission peak at 3.210, 3.210, 3.200, 3.200, and 3.080 eV for samples grown at current densities of -0.1, -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.0 mA/cm2, respectively. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) value was estimated to be around 0.20 to 0.37 eV. The strong, sharp NBE emission indicates the high optical quality of the ZnO nanostructures on the graphene layers. It was reported that the PL spectrum at 17 K typically shows five distinct NBE emission peaks with FWHM value of several milli-electron volt [2]. However, only one of these emission peaks which is equal to 3.240 eV was observed in our room-temperature measurement. The other four peaks which tentatively attributed to neutral-donor bound exciton peaks and free exciton peak were not able to be observed. From the PL spectra, no additional exciton peak associated with carbon impurities in carbon-doped ZnO films [28] was observed at 3.356 eV. This suggests that the carbon atoms in the graphene were not incorporated into the ZnO nanorods during their growth. The PL characteristics of the ZnO nanostructures on the graphene layers were almost the same to those of the ZnO nanostructures on single-crystalline substrates such as Si [29, 30]. The second band appears in the green region of the visible spectrum at approximately 2.25 to 2.30 eV for the grown samples. The sample at the current density of -2.0 mA/cm2 shows the highest green emission than other samples which indicates that there are more defects such as large fraction of O vacancies that have been introduced during the growth process [27, 3133]. The defects are speculated to exist in the seed layer which is formed during the initial growth stage. The observation of the NBE emission peak and weak green emission related to defects suggest high optical quality of the ZnO nanorods grown on the graphene layers. It can be said that the samples grown at −0.5 to −1.5 mA/cm2 seem to produce relatively high quality ZnO structures. The control of initial seed layer and further modification of growth procedure may improve the overall structure of ZnO.

          Chemical reaction and growth mechanism

          In this work, Zn (NO3)2 · 6H2O is used as source of Zn and O, while HMTA can be considered as a mineralizer to supply extra source of OH- and to define the shape and morphology of the nanorods. The chemical reactions involved are shown by Equations 1 to 7:
          Zn NO 3 2 Zn 2 + + 2 NO 3
          NO 3 + H 2 O + 2 e NO 2 + 2 OH
          Zn 2 + + OH Zn OH 2
          Zn OH 2 ZnO + H 2 O
          C 6 H 12 N 4 + 6 H 2 O COH 2 + 4 NH 3
          NH 3 + H 2 O NH 4 + + OH
          H 2 O ½ O 2 + 2 H + + 2 e .

          When HMTA was added into Zn (NO3)2 · 6H2O, no precipitation occurred as they are just mixed together initially. With the introduction of temperature, HMTA begins to decompose into ammonia and then Zn(OH)2 is produced. The complete decomposition is achieved by continuous heating [34, 35]. Finally, it produces ZnO and H2O with the presence of OH and e. HMTA acts as a weak base, slowly hydrolyzing in water and gradually releasing OH ions [34]. OH ions are produced during the chemical reaction of HMTA with water as shown in Equations 5 and 6, while e is obtained from the chemical reaction occurred at the anode as shown in Equation 7. The hydrolyzation of HMTA can be accelerated by increasing the pH of the electrolyte [36].

          The vertically aligned nanorods are produced with the help of HMTA. HMTA is a long-chain polymer and a non-polar chelating agent [37]. It will preferably attach to the non-polar facets of the zincite crystal, by cutting off the access of Zn2+ ions to the sides of the structure, leaving only the polar [001] face exposed to the Zn2+ ions for further nucleation and growth. Hence, HMTA acts as a non-ionic ligand chelate on the non-polar surface of ZnO nanocrystals on the six prismatic side planes of the wurtzite crystal and induces the growth in the c-axis [38]. Therefore, HMTA acts more like a shape-inducing polymer surfactant rather than just a buffer [38].

          The proposed growth mechanism as illustrated in Figure 5 was developed based on Figure 2b, c, d, e, f and Figure 3a, b, c, d, e. The structures formed during the initial growth determine the subsequently grown structures, where a vertical growth was enhanced during the actual growth resulting to the formation of ZnO nanorods. It clearly shows that the applied current density has strongly influenced the morphology of the initial structures. Porous structure helps increase the density of the vertically aligned ZnO nanorods. Cluster structures formed at high current density has resulted to large nanorods. In summary, the growth processes involve two main stages which are the formation of nucleation structure during the initial growth (RT to ST) and the formation of vertical nanorods during the actual growth. As proved by the SEM images, the vertical nanorods do not grow directly on the graphene, but they grow on the nucleation sites formed during the initial growth.

          Figure 5

          Schematic of the proposed growth mechanism.


          In conclusion, high density vertically aligned ZnO nanorods has successfully been grown on a single-layer graphene by electrochemical deposition method using heated zinc nitrate hexahydrate and HMTA as the electrolyte. HMTA and heat play a significant role in promoting the formation of hexagonal ZnO nanostructures. The applied current in the electrochemical process plays an important role in inducing the growth of the ZnO nanostructures on the SL graphene as well as in controlling the shape, diameter, and density of the nanostructures. The control of the initial structures and further modification of growth procedure may improve the overall structure of ZnO.



          NSAA thanks the Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology for the scholarship. This work was funded by the Nippon Sheet Glass Corp., Hitachi Foundation, Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, and the Malaysia Ministry of Education.

          Authors’ Affiliations

          Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
          Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA
          Department of Electrical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology
          MIMOS Berhad, Technology Park Malaysia


          1. Kumar B, Lee KY, Park H-K, Chae SJ, Lee YH, Kim S-W: Controlled growth of semiconducting nanowire, nanowall, and hybrid nanostructures on graphene for piezoelectric nanogenerators. ACS Nano 2011, 5(5):4197–4204. 10.1021/nn200942sView Article
          2. Kim Y-J, Lee J-H, Yi G-C: Vertically aligned ZnO nanostructures grown on graphene layers. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95(21):213101. 10.1063/1.3266836View Article
          3. Lee CJ, Lee TJ, Lyu SC, Zhang Y, Ruh H, Lee HJ: Field emission from well-aligned zinc oxide nanowires grown at low temperature. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 81(19):3648. 10.1063/1.1518810View Article
          4. Choi D, Choi M-Y, Choi WM, Shin H-J, Park H-K, Seo J-S, Park J, Yoon S-M, Chae SJ, Lee YH, Kim S-W, Choi J-Y, Lee SY, Kim JM: Fully rollable transparent nanogenerators based on graphene electrodes. Adv Mat 2010, 22(19):2187–2192. 10.1002/adma.200903815View Article
          5. Hwang JO, Lee DH, Kim JY, Han TH, Kim BH, Park M, No K, Kim SO: Vertical ZnO nanowires/graphene hybrids for transparent and flexible field emission. J Mater Chem 2011, 21(10):3432. 10.1039/c0jm01495hView Article
          6. Choi H-S, Vaseem M, Kim SG, Im Y-H, Hahn Y-B: Growth of high aspect ratio ZnO nanorods by solution process: effect of polyethyleneimine. J Solid State Chem 2012, 189: 25–31.View Article
          7. Wang X, Ding Y, Li Z, Song J, Wang ZL: Single-crystal mesoporous ZnO thin films composed of nanowalls. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113(5):1791–1794. 10.1021/jp809358mView Article
          8. Kim S-W, Park H-K, Yi M-S, Park N-M, Park J-H, Kim S-H, Maeng S-L, Choi C-J, Moon S-E: Epitaxial growth of ZnO nanowall networks on GaN/sapphire substrates. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 90: 033107. 10.1063/1.2430918View Article
          9. Hosono E, Fujihara S, Honma I, Zhou H: The fabrication of an upright-standing zinc oxide nanosheet for use in dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv Mater 2005, 17(17):2091–2094. 10.1002/adma.200500275View Article
          10. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Katsnelson MI, Grigorieva IV, Dubonos SV, Firsov AA: Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 2005, 438(7065):197–200. 10.1038/nature04233View Article
          11. Zhang Y, Tan Y-W, Stormer HL, Kim P: Experimental observation of the quantum hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. Nature 2005, 438(7065):201–204. 10.1038/nature04235View Article
          12. Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F, Lau CN: Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 2008, 8(3):902–907. 10.1021/nl0731872View Article
          13. Kim KS, Zhao Y, Jang H, Lee SY, Kim JM, Kim KS, Ahn J-H, Kim P, Choi J-Y, Hong BH: Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 2009, 457(7230):706–710. 10.1038/nature07719View Article
          14. Xiang JH, Zhu PX, Masuda Y, Okuya M, Kaneko S, Koumoto K: Flexible solar-cell from zinc oxide nanocrystalline sheets self-assembled by an in-situ electrodeposition process. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2006, 6(6):1797–1801. 10.1166/jnn.2006.244View Article
          15. Jin M-J, Lee S-D, Shin K-S, Jeong S-W, Yoon DH, Jeon D, Lee I-H, Lee DK, Kim S-W: Low-temperature solution-based growth of ZnO nanorods and thin films on Si substrates. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2009, 9(12):7432–7435.View Article
          16. Ahn MW, Park KS, Heo JH, Park JG, Kim DW, Choi KJ, Lee JH, Hong SH: Gas sensing properties of defect-controlled ZnO-nanowire gas sensor. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93(26):263103. 10.1063/1.3046726View Article
          17. Yi J, Lee JM, Park WI: Vertically aligned ZnO nanorods and graphene hybrid architectures for high-sensitive flexible gas sensors. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 2011, 155(1):264–269. 10.1016/j.snb.2010.12.033View Article
          18. Liu J-Y, Yu X-X, Zhang G-H, Wu Y-K, Zhang K, Pan N, Wang X-P: High performance ultraviolet photodetector fabricated with ZnO nanoparticles-graphene hybrid structures. Chin J Chem Phys 2013, 26(2):225–230. 10.1063/1674-0068/26/02/225-230View Article
          19. Yang K, Xu C, Huang L, Zou L, Wang H: Hybrid nanostructure heterojunction solar cells fabricated using vertically aligned ZnO nanotubes grown on reduced graphene oxide. Nanotechnology 2011, 22(40):405401. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/40/405401View Article
          20. Lee JM, Yi J, Lee WW, Jeong HY, Jung T, Kim Y, Park WI: ZnO nanorods-graphene hybrid structures for enhanced current spreading and light extraction in GaN-based light emitting diodes. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 100(6):061107. 10.1063/1.3683484View Article
          21. Lee KY, Kumar B, Park H-K, Choi WM, Choi J-Y, Kim S-W: Growth of high quality ZnO nanowires on graphene. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2012, 12(2):1551–1554. 10.1166/jnn.2012.4627View Article
          22. Liu L, Ryu S, Tomasik MR, Stolyarova E, Jung N, Hybertsen MS, Steigerwald ML, Brus LE, Flynn GW: Graphene oxidation: thickness-dependent etching and strong chemical doping. Nano Lett 2008, 8(7):1965–1970. 10.1021/nl0808684View Article
          23. Kim Y-J, Hadiyawarwan , Yoon A, Kim M, Yi G-C, Liu C: Hydrothermally grown ZnO nanostructures on few-layer graphene sheets. Nanotechnology 2011, 22(24):245603. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/24/245603View Article
          24. Xu C, Kim B-S, Lee J-H, Kim M, Hwang SW, Choi BL, Lee EK, Kim JM, Whang D: Seed-free electrochemical growth of ZnO nanotube arrays on single-layer graphene. Mater Lett 2012, 72: 25–28.View Article
          25. Xu C, Lee J-H, Lee J-C, Kim B-S, Hwang SW, Whang D: Electrochemical growth of vertically aligned ZnO nanorod arrays on oxidized bi-layer graphene electrode. Cryst Eng Comm 2011, 13(20):6036–6039. 10.1039/c1ce05695fView Article
          26. Sugunan A, Warad HC, Boman M, Dutta J: Zinc oxide nanowires in chemical bath on seeded substrates: role of hexamine. J Sol–gel Sci Techn 2006, 39(1):49–56. 10.1007/s10971-006-6969-yView Article
          27. Rusli NI, Tanikawa M, Mahmood MR, Yasui K, Hashim AM: Growth of high-density zinc oxide nanorods on porous silicon by thermal evaporation. Materials 2012, 5(12):2817–2832. 10.3390/ma5122817View Article
          28. Tan ST, Sun XW, Yu ZG, Wu P, Lo GQ, Kwong DL: p-type conduction in unintentional carbon-doped ZnO thin films. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 072101. 10.1063/1.2768917View Article
          29. Balucani M, Nenzi P, Chubenko E, Klyshko A, Bondarenko V: Electrochemical and hydrothermal deposition of ZnO on silicon: from continuous films to nanocrystals. J Nanopart Res 2011, 13(11):5985–5997. 10.1007/s11051-011-0346-7View Article
          30. Hassan NK, Hashim MR, Mahdi MA, Allam NK: A catalyst-free growth of ZnO nanowires on Si (100) substrates: effect of substrate position on morphological, structural and optical properties. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 2012, 1(2):86-P89. 10.1149/2.018202jssView Article
          31. Hassan NK, Hashim MR, Al-Douri Y, Al-Heuseen K: Current dependence growth of ZnO nanostructures by electrochemical deposition technique. Int J Electrochem Sci 2012, 7: 4625–4635.
          32. Liu Z, Ya J, Xin Y, LE : Growth of ZnO nanorods by aqueous solution method with electrodeposited ZnO seed layers. Appl Surf Sci 2009, 255(12):6415–6420. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.02.030View Article
          33. Mahmood K, Park SB, Sung HJ: Enhanced photoluminescence, Raman spectra and field-emission behavior of indium-doped ZnO nanostructures. J Mater Chem C 2013, 1(18):3138–3149. 10.1039/c3tc00082fView Article
          34. Amin G, Asif MH, Zainelabdin A, Zaman S, Nur O, Willander M: Influence of pH, precursor concentration, growth time, and temperature on the morphology of ZnO nanostructures grown by the hydrothermal method. J Nanomater 2011, 2011: 1–9.View Article
          35. Xu S, Wang ZL: One-dimensional ZnO nanostructures: solution growth and functional properties. Nano Res 2011, 4(11):1013–1098. 10.1007/s12274-011-0160-7View Article
          36. Zhang RH, Slamovich EB, Handwerker CA: Controlling growth rate anisotropy for formation of continuous ZnO thin films from seeded substrates. Nanotechnology 2013, 24(19):195603. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/19/195603View Article
          37. Baruah S, Dutta J: Hydrothermal growth of ZnO nanostructures. Sci Technol Adv Mater 2009, 10(1):013001. 10.1088/1468-6996/10/1/013001View Article
          38. Ul Hasan K: Graphene and ZnO Nanostructures for Nano-Optoelectronic & Biosensing Applications. Linköping University Electronic Press: Doctoral Thesis, Linköping University; 2012.


          © Aziz et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

          This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.