Open Access

Self-Consistent Hybrid Functional Calculations: Implications for Structural, Electronic, and Optical Properties of Oxide Semiconductors

Nanoscale Research Letters201712:19

DOI: 10.1186/s11671-016-1779-9

Received: 19 July 2016

Accepted: 9 December 2016

Published: 6 January 2017


The development of new exchange-correlation functionals within density functional theory means that increasingly accurate information is accessible at moderate computational cost. Recently, a newly developed self-consistent hybrid functional has been proposed (Skone et al., Phys. Rev. B 89:195112, 2014), which allows for a reliable and accurate calculation of material properties using a fully ab initio procedure. Here, we apply this new functional to wurtzite ZnO, rutile SnO2, and rocksalt MgO. We present calculated structural, electronic, and optical properties, which we compare to results obtained with the PBE and PBE0 functionals. For all semiconductors considered here, the self-consistent hybrid approach gives improved agreement with experimental structural data relative to the PBE0 hybrid functional for a moderate increase in computational cost, while avoiding the empiricism common to conventional hybrid functionals. The electronic properties are improved for ZnO and MgO, whereas for SnO2 the PBE0 hybrid functional gives the best agreement with experimental data.


Density functional theory Hybrid functionals Semiconducting oxides Dielectric functions

PACS Codes

71.15.Mb 71.20.Nr 78.20.Bh


Metal oxides exhibit many unique structural, electronic, and magnetic properties, making them useful for a broad range of technological applications. Metal oxides are exclusively used as transparent conducting oxides (TCOs) [1], find applications as building blocks in artificial multiferroic heterostructures [2] and as spin-filter devices [3], and even include a huge class of superconducting materials. To develop new materials for specific applications, it is necessary to have a detailed understanding of the interplay between the chemical composition of different materials, their structure, and their electronic, optical, or magnetic properties.

For the development of new functional oxides, computational methods that allow theoretical predictions of structural and electronic properties have become an increasingly useful tool. When optical or electronic properties are under consideration, electronic structure methods are necessary, with the most popular approach for solids being density functional theory (DFT). DFT has proven hugely successful in the calculation of structural properties of condensed matter systems and the electronic properties of simple metals [4]. The earliest developed approximate exchange-correlation functionals, however, face limitations, for example severely underestimating band gaps of semiconductors and insulators.

Over the last decade, several new, more accurate, exchange-correlation functionals have been proposed. Increased predictive accuracy often comes with an increased computational cost, and the adoption of these more accurate functionals has only been made possible through the continued increase in available computational power. One such more accurate, and more costly, approach is to use so-called hybrid functionals. These are constructed by mixing a fraction of Hartree-Fock exact-exchange with the exchange and correlation terms from some underlying DFT functional. Calculated material properties, such as lattice parameters and band gaps, however depend on the precise proportion of Hartree-Fock exact-exchange, α. Typical hybrid functionals treat α as a fixed empirical parameter, chosen by intuition and experimental calibration. A recently proposed self-consistent hybrid functional approach for condensed systems [5] avoids this empiricism and allows parameter-free hybrid functional calculations to be performed. In this approach, the amount of Hartree-Fock exact-exchange is identified as the inverse of the dielectric constant, with this constraint achieved by performing an iterative sequence of calculations to self-consistency.

Here we apply this new self-consistent hybrid functional to wurtzite ZnO and rutile SnO2, both materials with potential applications as TCOs, and MgO, a wide band gap insulator [6]. We examine the implications of the self-consistent hybrid functional for the structural, electronic, and optical properties. In the next section, we present the theoretical background, describe the self-consistent hybrid functional, and give the computational details. We then present results for the structural, electronic, and optical properties for ZnO, SnO2, and MgO, and compare these to data calculated using alternative exchange-correlation functionals and from experiments. The paper concludes with a summary and an outlook.


Density functional theory and hybrid functionals

DFT is a popular and reliable tool to theoretically describe the electronic structure of both crystalline and molecular systems. DFT provides a mean-field simplification of the many-body Schrödinger equation. The central variable is the electron density \(n(\vec {r}) = \psi ^{*}(\vec {r})\psi (\vec {r})\), determined from the electronic wavefunctions \(\psi (\vec {r})\), and the Hamiltonian is described as a functional of the \(n(\vec {r})\). Within the generalised Kohn-Sham scheme, the potential is
$$ v_{\text{GKS}}(\vec{r}, \vec{r}^{\prime}) = v_{\mathrm{H}}(\vec{r}) + v_{\text{xc}}(\vec{r},\vec{r}^{\prime}) + v_{\text{ext}}(\vec{r}). $$

The Hartree potential, v H(r), and the external potential, v ext(r), are in principle known. The exchange-correlation potential, \(v_{\text {xc}}(\vec {r},\vec {r}^{\prime })\), however, is not and must be approximated. Most successful early approximations make use of the local density approximation and the semilocal generalised gradient approximation (GGA), for example, in the parametrisation of Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) [7]. These approximations already allowed reliable descriptions of structural properties within the computational resources available at the time, but lacked accuracy when determining band energies, especially fundamental band gaps, and d valence band widths of semiconductors. These properties are particularly important for reliable calculations of electronic and optical behaviours of semiconductors.

In recent years, so-called hybrid functionals have gained in popularity. In a hybrid functional, some proportion of the local exchange-correlation potential is replaced by Hartree-Fock exact-exchange terms, giving a better description of electronic properties. The explicit inclusion of exact-exchange Hartree-Fock terms make these calculations computationally much more demanding compared to the earlier GGA calculations, and hybrid functional calculations have become routine only in recent years. The fraction of Hartree-Fock exact-exchange admixed in these hybrid functionals, α, is usually justified on experimental or theoretical grounds, and then fixed for a specific functional. This adds an empirical parameter and forfeits the ab initio nature of the calculations. One popular choice of α=0.25 is realised in the PBE0 functional [8].

In this work, we are concerned with full-range hybrid functionals, for which the generalised nonlocal exchange-correlation potential is
$$ v_{\text{xc}}(\vec{r},\vec{r}^{\prime}) = \alpha v_{\mathrm{x}}^{\text{ex}}(\vec{r},\vec{r}^{\prime}) + (1-\alpha) v_{\mathrm{x}}(\vec{r}) + v_{\mathrm{c}}(\vec{r}). $$
A common approach is to select α to reproduce the experimental band gap of solid state systems. Apart from adding an empirical parameter into the calculations, fitting the band gap of a material requires reliable experimental data. Moreover, this approach does not guarantee that all electronic properties, e.g. d band widths or defect levels, are correct [9]. Recently, it has been argued from the screening behaviour of nonmetallic systems that α can be related to the inverse of the static dielectric constant [10, 11]
$$ \alpha = \frac{1}{\epsilon_{\infty}}, $$

which may then be computed in a self-consistent cycle [5, 12]. This iteration to self-consistency requires additional computational effort, but removes the empiricism of previous hybrid functionals and restores the ab initio character of the calculations. The utility of this approach, however, depends on the accuracy of the resulting predicted material properties. Here, we are interested in the implications for the structural, electronic, and optical properties of oxide semiconductors, and consider ZnO, SnO2, and MgO as an illustrative set of materials.

Computational Details

The calculations presented in this work have been performed using the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method [13], as implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP 5.4.1) [1416]. For the calculation of structural and electronic properties, standard PAW potentials supplied with VASP were used, with 12 valence electrons for Zn atom (4s 23d 10), 14 valence electrons for Sn (5s 24d 105p 2), 8 valence electrons for Mg (2p 63s 2), and 6 valence electrons for O (2s 22p 4), respectively. When calculating dielectric functions, we have used the corresponding GW potentials, which give a better description of high-energy unoccupied states.

To evaluate the performance of the self-consistent hybrid approach, we have calculated structural and electronic data using three functionals: GGA in the PBE parametrisation [7], the hybrid functional PBE0 [8], and the self-consistent hybrid functional [5], which we denote scPBE0.

Structural relaxations were performed for the regular unit cells within a scalar-relativistic approximation, using dense k point meshes for Brillouin zone integration (8×8×6 for wurtzite ZnO, 6×6×8 for rutile SnO2, and 10 × 10 × 10 for rocksalt MgO). For each material, we performed several fixed-volume calculations, in the cases of ZnO and SnO2 allowing internal structural parameters to relax until all forces on ions were smaller than 0.001 eV Å−1. Zero-pressure geometries were determined by then fitting a cubic spline to the total energies with respect to the unit cell volumes.

To evalutate the self-consistent fraction of Hartree-Fock exact-exchange, α, the dielectric function ε is calculated in an iterative series of full geometry optimisations. To calculate ε , for each of the ground state structures, the static dielectric tensor has been calculated (including local field effects) from the response to finite electric fields. For non-cubic systems (ZnO, SnO2), ε was obtained by averaging over the spur of the static dielectric tensor \(\frac {1}{3}\left (2\epsilon _{\infty }^{\perp }+\epsilon _{\infty }^{\parallel }\right)\). We have considered ε to be converged when the difference between two subsequent calculations falls below ±0.01 [5].

Results and Discussion

Structural properties

ZnO crystallises in the hexagonal wurtzite structure of space group P63mc (No. 186). SnO2 crystallises in the tetragonal rutile structure of space group P42/mnm (No. 136). MgO crystallises in the cubic rocksalt structure of space group Fm\(\bar {3}\)m (No. 225). Each crystal structure was first fully geometry optimised, as described in the computational details section. The energy/volume data for the GGA, PBE0, and scPBE0 exchange-correlation potentials are plotted in the upper panels of Fig. 1. The GGA functional significantly overestimates the ground state volume relative to experimental values for all three materials. This is due to shortcomings in this simpler early exchange-correlation potential. The PBE0 functional adds a fixed proportion of Hartree-Fock exact-exchange (α=0.25) and produces structural properties in much better agreement with experimental data.
Fig. 1

Upper panels: total energy (in eV) with respect to the unit cell volume for wurtzite ZnO (left panel), rutile SnO2 (middle panel), and rocksalt MgO (right panel) calculated by means of GGA (black), PBE0 (red), and scPBE0 functionals (green), respectively. The experimental unit cell volume is depicted by the dashed orange line. Lower panels: convergence for the dielectric constant ε is obtained after three steps in the additional self-consistency cycle

For our scPBE0 calculations, for each material, the static dielectric constant converged in three iterations (Fig. 1, lower panels). Here, computationally the most expensive part is the full geometry optimisation using the PBE0 functional. Each subsequent step in the self-consistent loop to determine the amount of Hartree-Fock exact-exchange starts from optimised crystal structures of the previous step and reduces the computational costs considerably.

Using the self-consistent amount of Hartree-Fock exact-exchange in the self-consistent hybrid functional yielded structural properties in slightly better agreement with experimental data (Fig. 1, upper panels). The improved description of structural properties using the scPBE0 functional is also evident from the lattice constants a (and c), which are given together with those obtained with the other two functionals and experimental data in Table 1.
Table 1

Ground state structural parameters for wurtzite ZnO, rutile SnO2, and rocksalt MgO obtained with different approximations for the exchange-correlation potential in comparison to low-temperature experimental data






a [Å]




3.248 [20]

c [Å]




5.204 [20]





0.382 [21]





3.72 [22]




E gap [eV]




3.4449 [17]






a [Å]




4.737 [23]

c [Å]




3.186 [23]





0.307 [23]





3.92 [24]




E gap [eV]




3.596 [18]






a [Å]




4.199 [25]





3.01 [26]




E gap [eV]




7.833 [19]

The quality of the structural data compared to experiment can also be seen from Fig. 2 where the coefficients of the different obtained ground state volumes with respect to the experimental one are plotted for the three different oxides. Again, the results obtained with the new self-consistent hybrid functional show closest agreement with experiment.
Fig. 2

Ground state unit cell volumes V with respect to the experimental volume V exp calculated by means of the GGA (black), PBE0 (red), and scPBE0 functionals (green), respectively. The experimental volumes correspond to V/V exp=1 (dashed horizontal line)

Electronic and Optical Properties

Figure 3 shows electronic band structures calculated using scPBE0 for wurtzite ZnO, rutile SnO2, and rocksalt MgO. The calculated (versus experimental) direct band gaps are 3.425 eV (3.4449 eV [17]) for ZnO, 3.827 eV (3.596 eV [18]) for SnO2, and 8.322 eV (7.833 eV [19]) for MgO, respectively (Table 1). Figure 4 shows the GGA, PBE0, and scPBE0 calculated band gaps alongside the experimental values. It can be seen that PBE0 calculated band gaps are underestimated compared to the experimental ones for all three oxides, but being very close for SnO2. The scPBE0 calculated band gaps are larger than the PBE0 values, thereby improving the results for ZnO and MgO, but worsen the result for SnO2. In general, the band gaps calculated using the hybrid functionals (PBE0, scPBE0) are within ten per cent of the experimental band gaps.
Fig. 3

Electronic band structures of wurtzite ZnO (left panel), rutile SnO2 (middle panel), and rocksalt MgO (right panel), calculated with the scPBE0 functional. Energies are in electron volt (eV) and the valence band maximum is set to zero
Fig. 4

Ground state Kohn-Sham band gaps E KS with respect to the experimental band gap E exp calculated by means of the GGA (black), PBE0 (red), and scPBE0 functionals (green), respectively. The experimental band gaps correspond to E KS/E exp=1 (dashed horizontal line)

The scPBE0 calculations provide accurate structural properties and band gaps versus experimental data, and we can therefore be relatively confident when calculating properties less easily accessible directly by experiment. We have calculated the real (ε 1) and imaginary (ε 2) parts of the dielectric functions via Fermi’s Golden rule summing over transition matrix elements. For these calculations, we used the recommended VASP GW pseudopotentials and considerably increased the number of empty bands to ensure converged results.

Figure 5 shows the real (ε 1) and imaginary (ε 2) parts of the dielectric functions calculated with the GGA, PBE0, and scPBE0 functionals. Because the GGA functional significantly underestimates the band gap, the imaginary parts of the dielectric functions exhibit an onset, corresponding to the first allowed direct transition at the fundamental band gap, at lower energies. The onset energy improves considerably when switching to the PBE0 hybrid functional and improves further compared to experiment when using the self-consistent hybrid functional. For the two hybrid functionals, the overall shape of the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric functions are very similar in their peak structure but differ compared to the pure GGA functional. One reason for this difference might be the improvements in the d band width and position when using the hybrid functionals compared to the pure GGA one. Clarifying this would require a more in-depth comparison of the different band structures and how their specific features influence the dielectric functions.
Fig. 5

Real ε 1 (upper panels) and imaginary ε 2 (lower panels) parts of the dielectric functions calculated by means of GGA (black), PBE0 (dashed red), and scPBE0 functionals (green), respectively. Dielectric functions are shown for wurtzite ZnO (left panels), rutile SnO2 (middle panels), and rocksalt MgO (right panels)


We have presented a theoretical investigation on the application of a new self-consistent hybrid functional to oxide semiconductors ZnO, SnO2, and MgO. We have presented and compared calculated structural, electronic, and optical properties of these oxides to experimental data, and have discussed the implications of using the new self-consistent hybrid functional. We find that the self-consistent hybrid functional gives calculated properties with accuracies as good as or better than the PBE0 hybrid functional. The additional computational cost due to the self-consistency cycle is justified by avoiding the empiricism of similar hybrid functionals, which restores the ab initio character of these calculations.



Density functional theory


Generalised gradient approximation


Projector-augmented wave


Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof


Transparent conducting oxides


Vienna ab initio simulation package



This research has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 641864 (INREP). This work made use of the ARCHER UK National Supercomputing Service ( via the membership of the UK’s HPC Materials Chemistry Consortium, funded by EPSRC (EP/L000202) and the Balena HPC facility of the University of Bath. BJM acknowledges support from the Royal Society (UF130329).

Authors’ contributions

AW and BJM conceived the idea. DF performed the calculations, analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript. DF, BJM, and AW participated in the discussions of the calculated results. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, University of Bath


  1. Minami T (2005) Transparent conducting oxide semiconductors for transparent electrodes. Semicond Sci Technol 20: S35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Fritsch D, Ederer C (2010) Epitaxial strain effects in the spinel ferrites CoF e2O4 and NiF e2O4 from first principles. Phys Rev B 82: 104117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Caffrey NM, Fritsch D, Archer T, Sanvito S, Ederer C (2013) Spin-filtering efficiency of ferrimagnetic spinels CoF e2O4 and NiF e2O4. Phys Rev B 87: 024419.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hasnip PJ, Refson K, Probert MIJ, Yates JR, Clark SJ, Pickard CJ (2014) Density functional theory in the solid state. Phil Trans R Soc A 372: 20130270.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Skone JH, Govoni M, Galli G (2014) Self-consistent hybrid functional for condensed systems. Phys Rev B 89: 195112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fritsch D, Schmidt H, Grundmann M (2006) Pseudopotential band structures of rocksalt MgO, ZnO, and Mg1−x Zn x O. Appl Phys Lett 88: 134104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77: 3865.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Adamo C, Barone V (1999) Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. J Chem Phys 110: 6158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Walsh A, Da Silva JLF, Wei SH (2008) Theoretical description of carrier mediated magnetism in cobalt doped ZnO. Phys Rev Lett 100: 256401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Alkauskas A, Broqvist P, Pasquarello A (2011) Defect levels through hybrid density functionals: insights and applications. Phys Stat Sol B 248: 775.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Marques MAL, Vidal J, Oliveira MJT, Reining L, Botti S (2011) Density-based mixing parameter for hybrid functionals. Phys Rev B 83: 035119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerosa M, Bottani CE, Caramella L, Onida G, Di Valentin C, Pacchioni G (2015) Electronic structure and phase stability of oxide semiconductors: performance of dielectric-dependent hybrid functional DFT, benchmarked against GW band structure calculations and experiments. Phys Rev B 91: 155201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50: 17953.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47: 558.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kresse G, Hafner J (1994) Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal −amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys Rev B 49: 14251.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mat Sci 6: 15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Liang WY, Yoffe AD (1968) Transmission spectra of ZnO single crystals. Phys Rev Lett 20: 59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Reimann K, Steube M (1998) Experimental determination of the electronic band structure of SnO2. Solid State Commun 105: 649.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Whited RC, Flaten CJ, Walker WC (1973) Exciton thermoreflectance of MgO and CaO. Solid State Commun 13: 1903.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Reeber RR (1970) Lattice parameters of ZnO from 4.2° to 296° K. J Appl Phys 41: 5063.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Schulz H, Thiemann KH (1979) Structure parameters and polarity of the wurtzite type compounds SiC-2H and ZnO. Solid State Commun 32: 783.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Heltemes EC, Swinney HL (1967) Anisotropy in lattice vibrations of zinc oxide. J Appl Phys 38: 2387.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Haines J, Léger JM (1996) X-ray diffraction study of the phase transitions and structural evolution of tin dioxide at high pressure: relationships between structure types and implications for other rutile-type dioxides. Phys Rev B 55: 11144.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Summitt R (1968) Infrared absorption in single-crystal stannic oxide: optical lattice-vibration modes. J Appl Phys 39: 3762.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hazen RH (1976) Effects of temperature and pressure on the cell dimension and X-ray temperature factors of periclase. Am Mineral 61: 266.Google Scholar
  26. Jasperse JR, Kahan A, Plendl JN, Mitra SS (1966) Temperature dependence of infrared dispersion in ionic crystals LiF and MgO. Phys Rev 146: 526.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2017