Open Access

Relaxation behavior of polyethylene welded joints

  • Valeriy Demchenko1, 2,
  • Maksym Iurzhenko1, 2Email author,
  • Andriy Shadrin1 and
  • Anatoliy Galchun1
Nanoscale Research Letters201712:280

DOI: 10.1186/s11671-017-2059-z

Received: 29 December 2016

Accepted: 7 April 2017

Published: 18 April 2017


The paper presents results of the investigation of structure relaxation and thermal properties of PE-80 and PE-100 polyethylene hot-tool butt welds. It was found that a weld with the re-crystallized crystalline structure is formed during the welding of dissimilar types of polyethylene. It is shown that within a long period (1 year) the relaxation occurs not only in amorphous but also in the crystalline phase (crystalline α-form transforms into mixed αβ-form), with respective changes in polyethylene properties.


Polyethylene PE-80 PE-100 Butt fusion Welding Relaxation


81.20.Vj 81.05.Lg 81.07.-b


Progress in the modern material science has caused wide expansion of thermoplastics application in various industries: chemical, construction, medical, radio-technical, electronic, foodstuff etc. [16].

Welding process for thermoplastic polymers happens with activation of welded surfaces either before bringing these surfaces in contact (hot tool, hot gas, or IR-radiation welding) or with activation of surfaces simultaneous with bringing surfaces in contact (friction or ultrasonic welding) [7].

Along the cooling of joint, the super-molecular structure is formed in the weld; such welds have the respective stress fields which are relaxing with time [8]. These competing processes determine the final properties of the welded joints. The technological goal is to receive the joint with the properties as close as possible to the properties of the parent raw material.

Various physical and chemical transformations occur in the joint—melt fluidity is changing, orientation crystallization, re-crystallization, and even partial destruction occur, and as a result we receive heterogeneous structure of the welded joint [9].

Thereby, the goal of this work is a complex investigation of structure and property relaxation behavior in welded joints of dissimilar types of polyethylene, using the methods of wide- and small-angle X-ray scattering, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermal analysis.


Materials and processing

The following two types of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) specimens with different long-term minimum required strength (MRS, within 50 years at 20 °C) have been used for welding experiments and further structural, thermal, and field performance data investigations: PE-80 (MWbimodal 300,000 g/mol, density 0.953 g/cm3, MRS 8 MPa) and PE-100 (MWbimodal 300,000 g/mol, density 0.960 g/cm3, MRS 10 MPa).

Hot-tool butt welding experiments have been carried out on pipes with 63-mm outside diameter and 6-mm wall thickness, with the following welding parameters: hot tool temperature 200 °C, upsetting pressure 0.2 MPa within 60 s, with dwell time 3 s and cooling time 6 min. Serial SAT-1 hot-tool butt welding device produced by E.O.Paton Electric Welding Institute’s factory has been used for the welding experiments. Figure 1 represents the photo of PE-80 with PE-100 welded joint.
Fig. 1

Welded joint of PE-80 and PE-100 polyethylene pipe types

Equipment and measurements

The amorphous and amorphous-crystalline structure peculiarities of PE-80 and PE-100 specimens, as well as PE-80/PE-100 welds (Fig. 2) have been investigated by wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) method using DRON-4-07 diffractometer (Burevestnik, Saint Petersburg, Russia), whose X-ray optical scheme was used to “pass” primary-beam radiation through samples.
Fig. 2

Scheme of welded joint of PE-80/PE-100 polyethylene pipe types with position of a sample for X-ray study

The heterogeneous structuring of these polymeric systems (at the nanometer level) was studied via small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) with a CRM-1 camera (Orel scientific equipment factory, Russia), having a slit collimator of the primary irradiation beam made via the Kratky method. The geometric parameters of the camera satisfied the condition of infinite height of the primary beam [10].

All X-ray structural investigations have been carried out using CuК α-emission monochromated by using Ni-filter, at temperature T = 20 ± 2 °C.

One millimeter thick specimens have been cut out of the welded joint as it is shown on Fig. 3. Such specimens have been investigated in their original plate shape (PE-80/PE-100) as well as in crushed to 1 × 1 mm size pieces mode (PE-80/PE-100 randomized). Structural organization of the initial polyethylene types PE-80 and PE-100 have been investigated in various directions, and diffraction patterns identical to each other were observed.
Fig. 3

WAXS diffraction patterns of PE-80, PE-100, and of PE-80/PE-100 welded joint (experimental curve), PE-80/PE-100 (randomized), PE-80/PE-100 (theoretical curve)

Thermal properties of the welds have been explored by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) with TA Instruments DSC Q2000 (USA) in the inert nitrogen atmosphere under temperatures from 40 to 200 °C with linear heating rate 20 °C/min.

Thermal stability and thermal-oxidative degradation of welds have been investigated using TA Instruments TGA Q50 (USA) in dry air environment at temperatures from 30 to 700 °C with linear heating rate 20 °C/min. Thermomechanical behavior and deformation characteristics of welds have been investigated using TA Instruments TMA Q400 EM (USA) in dry air environment at 5 °C temperature modulation regime with heating rate 10 °C/min at temperatures from 30 to 250 °C. Measurements have been carried out in thermal expansion mode. Cylinder-shaped indenter with 2.8 ± 0.01 mm diameter has been used with loading on the specimen (10–1 MPa).

All the devices from TA Instruments have been certified according to the international standard ISO 9001:2000.

All investigations were repeated two times with different specimens for each time to enhance an accuracy of the measurements.

Results and discussion

Previously, it was reported [9] that WAXS diffraction analysis of PE-80, PE-100, and PE-80/PE-100 welds showed that all of them have amorphous-crystalline structure (Fig. 3), and the welding of dissimilar types of polyethylene gives a joint with texturized crystalline phase. It was explained by melting of crystallites with their further re-crystallization and simultaneous orientation. In Fig. 3 (for further comparison), this is indicated with the growth of diffraction maximum (200) whose angular position (2θ m ) on diffraction pattern is equal to 23.6°, and reduction of maximum (110) with angular position is 21.2°. X-ray diffraction patterns of these specimens are presented on Fig. 3 [11]. Diffraction maxima at 2θ max  = 21.2 i 23.6° have been used for the calculation.

Effective size (L) of the polymer systems crystallites has been evaluated using Scherer’s method [12]:
$$ L = \mathrm{K}\lambda {\left(\beta \cos {\theta}_{max}\right)}^{-1}, $$
where К is the constant depending on the crystallites shape (if the shape is not determined К = 0.9), and β the is angular half-width (width on the half of height) of diffraction maximum. This evaluation has shown that the average value for L is 7.2 nm for PE-80 and PE-100, and 7.1 and 7.6 nm for systems (PE-80/PE-100 randomized) and (PE-80/PE-100), respectively. For the PE-80/PE-100 randomized welded joints studied after 1 year, L is 7.1. These calculated sizes of crystallites at different diffraction maxima for each specimen are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Structural characteristics of PE-80 and PE-100 polyethylene and of PE-80/PE-100 welded joint


Crystallinity level (DSC), %

Crystallinity level (WAXS), %

Crystallites size L (2θ max  = 21.2°), nm

Crystallites size L (2θ max  = 23.6°), nm












PE-100 welded joint





PE-100 welded joint (randomized)




1 year


PE-100 welded joint


1 year


PE-100 welded joint (randomized)




* – crystallites size of welded joint investigated in the direction as shown on the model object Fig. 2, according to WAXS data

For detailed analysis of PE-80/PE-100 welded joint structural organization, the experimental X-ray diffractogram has been compared with calculated diffractogram of mechanical mixture of PE-80 and PE-100 specimens (in the absence of interaction between them) [9]. The calculation was done assuming that components (both types of polyethylene) have additive effect on the diffraction pattern:
$$ {I}_{ad} = {w}_1{I}_1+{w}_2{I}_2, $$

where I 1 and I 2—the intensity of WAXS scattering for PE-80 and PE-100 specimens; w 1 and w 2—weight parts of the components in the system (w 1 + w 2 = 1). From the comparison of experimental and calculated X-ray diffraction patterns of welds, a nonadditive change in the experimental diffraction curve is observed comparing with the calculated one (Fig. 3). This result is important since it confirms the interaction between macromolecules of both types of polyethylene in PE-80/PE-100 welded joint.

Using Matthews’s method [13], the relative level of crystallinity (X cr ) has been evaluated:
$$ {X}_{\mathrm{cr}}={Q}_{\mathrm{cr}}{\left({Q}_{\mathrm{cr}}+{Q}_{\mathrm{am}}\right)}^{{\textstyle \hbox{-} }1}\cdot 100, $$
where Q cr—area of diffraction maxima characterizing the crystalline structure of polymers; Q cr + Q am—total area of diffraction pattern in the interval of scattering angles (2θ 1÷ 2θ 2), in which amorphous-crystalline structure of polymer is revealed. The relative level of crystallinity has been also calculated from the DSC curves using the following equation:
$$ {X}_{cr}=\frac{\varDelta {H}_m}{\varDelta H{{}^{\circ}}_m}\cdot 100\%, $$

where ΔH°m—enthalpy of melting for completely crystallized polymer (for polyethylene ΔH°m = 286.7 J/g); ΔHm—enthalpy of melting of polymer, experimentally obtained from DSC curve.

This evaluation has shown that for both types of polyethylene as well as for the randomized specimen of welded joint the crystallinity level is practically the same (Table 1).

WAXS analysis of welded joints X-ray diffraction patterns made immediately after the welding process and 1 year later shows that relaxation process occurs in the welded joint crystalline structure (Fig. 4). Under this process, the α-form crystalline modification transforms into mixed αβ-form. This process is revealed on the welded joint diffraction pattern with three diffraction maxima at 2θ m  = 21.50°, 23.17°, and 23.90°, inherent to orthorhombic and monocline structure of polyethylene systems [14].
Fig. 4

WAXS diffraction patterns of PE-80/PE-100 welds, received immediately after the welding process (1) and in 1 year after the welding (2)

Detected peculiarities of PE-80 and PE-100 types of polyethylene and of PE-80/PE-100 welded joint are of interest for investigation of their structure heterogeneity.

Analyzing the SAXS profiles of PE-80, PE-100, and PE-80/PE-100 welded joint (presented in Fig. 5 as Ĩ dependence on q, as well as s 3 Ĩ on s 3, in accordance to works [15, 16], where Ĩ is the scattering intensity without consideration of collimation correction, and q is equal to (4π/λ)sinθ = 2πs), it was determined that all these specimens are characterized with heterogeneous structure, namely with the presence in their volume of electron density contrast Δρ (Δρ = ρ–<ρ>, where ρ and <ρ> are local and average values of electron density). It means that not less than two types of heterogeneity areas with different values of electron density are present in their volume.
Fig. 5

SAXS intensity profiles for PE-80, PE-100, and PE-80/PE-100 welded specimens, received immediately after the welding process and in 1 year after the welding

Besides that, a “shoulder”-like interference maximum (characterizing the periodical location of similar in density areas of heterogeneity (crystalline and amorphous areas) in the volume of polymer) are present on the PE-80, PE-100, and PE-80/PE-100 profiles of intensity of welds specimens (Fig. 5). Average value D of alternation (in the volume of polymer) of heterogeneity areas with similar density (distance between the nearest centers of area with similar density), according to Bragg equation (considering “sinus law” for small angles (2sinθ = sin2θ = ) [11]:
$$ D=\lambda /2{\theta}_m, $$

for the welded joint is equal to approximately 27 nm.

Evaluation of effective size of existing areas of heterogeneity in the volume of PE-80, PE-100, and PE-80/PE-100 welded specimens was performed by calculating of such a structural parameter as the range of heterogeneity l p [15, 16]. This parameter is directly connected to the average diameter of areas of heterogeneity in two-phase system (<l 1 > i <l 2 >):
$$ {l}_p={\varphi}_2<{l}_1>={\varphi}_1<{l}_2>, $$

where φ 1, φ 2—volume parts of micro-areas (φ 1 + φ 2 = 1). It was detected that l p value in the PE-80/PE-100 welded joint (l p  = 20 nm) is bigger comparing with pure PE-80 (l p = 16 nm) and PE-100 (l p = 18 nm) specimens. In addition, it was found that heterogeneous structure of PE-80/PE-100 weld has not changed after 1 year (Fig. 5).

One-year relaxation changes in PE-80/PE-100 welded joint comparing to the “fresh” joint are revealed by means of thermogravimetric (Fig. 6) and thermomechanical (Fig. 7) analysis.
Fig. 6

Result of TGA study. Relative weight (a) and derivate weight on temperature (b) of PE-80/PE-100 welded joints

Fig. 7

Result of TMA study. Related deformation (a) and derivate related deformation on temperature (b) of PE-80/PE-100 welded joints

Temperature of oxidation degradation (T d ) and maximum of oxidation degradation intensity (T d max. ) of 1-year old PE-80/PE-100 welded joint (Table 2) have been defined from the thermogravimetric curves. It is clear that thermal stability decreases with time, most probably, due to the relaxation of the texturized area formed during the welding and to the transfer of the polymer material in this area to the initial status of pipe materials.
Table 2

Thermal characteristics of the PE-80/PE-100 welded joint


T d , °C

T d max , °C

T m , °C

T m max. , °C

PE-80/PE-100 welded joint





1 year PE-80/

PE-100 welded joint





Thermomechanical behavior of the initial and aged welded joints is similar. The deformation of specimens is a result of polymer melting and the features of melting (described by deformation curves) reflect the changes of crystalline phase occured during welding and further aging. As it is seen from Fig. 7, the onset temperature (T m ) intensive deformation, as well as the maximum (T m max. ) of intensive deformation of PE-80/PE-100 weld decrease with time (Table 2). T m and T m max are parameters of the melting process of polymer at heating during TMA experiment, the specimen deformation occurs with melting of polymer. The differences in values of T m and T m max exists due to relaxation in time of polymer in the textured zone of the welded joint, and, probably, to transfer of its structure to the equilibrium state.


The paper presents results of the investigation of structure relaxation and thermal properties of PE-80 and PE-100 polyethylene hot-tool butt welds. It was found that during the welding of dissimilar types of polyethylene a process of re-crystallization of crystalline phase of the weld structure is observed. It is shown that within a long period (one-year) not only amorphous but also the crystalline phase relaxes (crystalline α-form transforms into mixed αβ-form). These features become apparent in relaxation of thermal and thermomechanical properties as well. Decreasing of the oxidative degradation onset and temperature maximum with time, as well as intensive deformation onset conditioned by polymer melting are revealed.



Submitted results were obtained during the fulfillment of the budget supported project in the Plastics Welding Department of the E.O.Paton Electric Welding Institute of the NAS of Ukraine.

Authors’ contributions

VD and MI wrote the manuscript. VD fulfilled the WAXS and the SAXS investigations and analysis of the WAXS and the SAXS data. MI and AS provided valuable discussions and contributed in results analysis comparing to the structural peculiarities of the samples. AG performed butt fusion welding of PE pipes. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

VD is PhD in Polymer Physics, staff researcher at the Plastics Welding Department of the E.O.Paton Electric Welding Institute of the NAS of Ukraine and at the Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry of the NAS of Ukraine. MI is Doctor in Physics, Head of Department, Plastics Welding Department of the E.O.Paton Electric Welding Institute of the NAS of Ukraine, and senior staff scientist at the Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry of the NAS of Ukraine. AS is PhD in Technical Sciences, staff researcher at the Plastics Welding Department of the E.O.Paton Electric Welding Institute of the NAS of Ukraine. AG is the leading engineer at the Plastics Welding Department of the E.O.Paton Electric Welding Institute of the NAS of Ukraine.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Plastics Welding Department, E.O.Paton Electric Welding Institute, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine


  1. Yuhnevsky PI, Shirokii GT (2004) Building materials and products: Schoolbook. UP «Tehnoprint», Minsk, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  2. Galchun A, Korab N, Kondratenko V, Demchenko V, Shadrin A, Anistratenko V, Iurzhenko M (2015) Structural features and thermal characteristics of welded joints of technical polyethylenes. Polym J 37:242–248, in UkrainianGoogle Scholar
  3. Alpern VD (2002) What shoud be known about the pipes’ polyethylene. Eng Netw Made Polym Mater 2:5–9, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  4. Ryzhov V, Kalugina Y, Biserova N, Kazakov Y (2011) Polyethylene of pipe types. Structure and properties. Polymeric pipes 34:56–60, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  5. Gorilovskiy M, Gvozdev I (2008) Pipe type of polyethylene PE 100 main technical requirements and their development. Polymeric Pipes 22:47–50, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  6. Pipe polyethylene import to Ukraine market review 2013. Polymeric pipes – Ukraine (2013) 29:18–22, in Russian
  7. Volchenko VN (1991) Welding and weldable materials. Metallurgy, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Volkov SS, Ya CB (1987) Welding of plastics. Chemistry, Moscow, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  9. Galchun A, Korab N, Kondratenko V, Demchenko V, Shadrin A, Anistratenko V, Iurzhenko M (2015) Nanostructurization and thermal properties of polyethylenes’ welds. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:138–149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kratky O, Pilz I, Schmitz PJ (1966) Absolute intensity measurement of small-angle x-ray scattering by means of a standard sample. J Colloid Interface Sci 21:24–34View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lipatov YS, Shilov VV, Gomza YP, Kruglyak NE (1982) Radiographic methods of investigations of polymers. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  12. Gin’e A (1961) X-Ray Diffraction of Crystals. Theory and Practice. Fizmatgiz, Moscow, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  13. Shtompel’ VI, Yu K (2008) Structure of Linear Polyurethanes. Naukova dumka, Kiev, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  14. Russell KE, Hunter BK, Heyding RD (1997) Monoclinic polyethylene revisited. Polymer 38:1409–1414View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ruland W (1971) Small-angle scattering of two-phase systems: determination and significance of systematic deviations from Porod’s law. J Appl Cryst 4:70–73View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Perret R, Ruland W (1971) Eine verbesserte Auswertungsmethode fur die Rontgenkleinewin-kelstreuung von Hochpolymeren. Kolloid Z – ZPolymere 247:835–843View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017