Formation and Organization of Amino Terminated Self-assembled Layers on Si(001) Surface
© to the authors 2007
Received: 14 May 2007
Accepted: 11 June 2007
Published: 29 June 2007
We have investigated the effects of dipping time, solution concentration and solvent type on the formation of self-assembled monolayers with aminosiloxane molecules (i.e.,N-(3 trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine (TPDA)) on the Si(001) surface. Studies performed with an ellipsometer showed that monolayers with a thickness of about 1.2 nm were formed when the dipping time is about 2 h, while multilayer were observed for longer time periods. The effect of the TPDA concentration on the thickness of the deposited layer was not very profound, however, the contact angle data exhibit importance of concentration on the surface coverage. The type of the solvent used in the formation of the monolayers was found an important parameter. Monolayers were formed with solvent having larger dielectric constants. Relatively thick multilayer was observed when benzene was used as the solvent, due to its quite low dielectric constant (hydrophobicity).
Self-assembly has recently emerged as a new approach in chemical synthesis, nanotechnology, polymer science, materials science, and engineering. Molecular self-assembly systems lie at the interface of these disciplines and many self-assembling systems have been developed. Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) are a class of molecular assemblies that are typically prepared by exposure of a surface to molecules with chemical groups that possess strong affinities for the substrate. The driving force for the formation of the monolayer includes chemisorption of functionalized molecules on the substrate surface, and the intermolecular interactions. Due to their ease of preparation and controllable surface chemical functionality, SAMs represent suitable model systems for studying wetting [1–3], corrosion [4, 5], adhesion [6, 7], tribology [8–12], charge transfer through molecules , and model surfaces for biochemistry and cell biology . Other applications (resistance to etchants  and protein adsorption, modified electrodes for electrochemistry) rely on the ability of SAMs to prevent diffusion of other molecules to the surface of the underlying substrate .
The final morphology and thickness of a SAMs are reported to be extremely sensitive to experimental parameters including the type of precursor molecule, concentration, type of solvent and its quality, temperature and reaction time, etc. Despite several experimental investigations dedicated to the grafting of organic molecules to the silicon surface, there are only few description of such grafting and fewer attempts to understand the self-assembly formation. In the present work, SAMs with amino end group were prepared by usingN-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine (TPDA) molecule on the Si(001) surface. Effects of dipping time, solution concentration and solvent type on the formation of TPDA on Si(001) have been investigated. Subsequently, thicknesses and water contact angle of each film were measured using imaging ellipsometry and contact angle goniometer, respectively.
The substrates used in these experiments were Si(001) wafers (n-type, obtained from Shin-etsu, Handoutai, Japan). The substrates were cut into 5 × 5 mm pieces for further modification. The substrates were first cleaned by repeated rinsing with deionized water and ethanol. They were then further cleaned a mixture of NH3 (25%, v/v), H2O2 (30%, v/v), and deionized water having a volume ratio of 1:1:5 at the temperature of 70 °C during 20 min. Afterward, the substrates were washed with ethanol and dried under nitrogen stream. Finally, these substrates were exposed in UV/ozone chamber (Irvine, CA: Model 42, Jelight Company Inc. USA) for 15 min prior to modification in order to remove hydrocarbon and to produce a hydrophilic surface. For this cleaned surface, the water contact angle was about 3°. The lower contact angle obtained is consistent with the presence of increased number of hydroxyl groups on the cleaned surface .
Unless otherwise stated, freshly prepared TPDA (Aldrich USA) solutions (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0%, v/v) in absolute ethanol (Aldrich USA) were used for the monolayer formation. Silicon wafers were dipped in the TPDA solution of particular concentrations and were removed from solution after selected time intervals. Static water contact angles of the sample surfaces were measured at 25 °C in ambient air using an automatic contact angle goniometer equipped with a flash camera (model DSA 100, Krüss, Germany) applying the sessile drop method. The volume of the drop used was always 1 μL in all measurements. The contact angles are calculated by using the software of the instrument. All reported values herein are the averages of at least nine measurements taken at three different locations on each sample surface and have a maximum deviation of ±1°. The vertical structures of the samples, especially the (optical) thickness of layers were also measured by means of an auto-nulling imaging ellipsometer (Nanofilm EP3, Germany). All thickness measurements have been performed at a wavelength of 532 nm with an angle of incidence of 72°. In the layer thickness analysis, a four-zone auto-nulling procedure integrating over a sample area of approximately 50 × 50 μm followed by a fitting algorithm has been performed. In the analysis of the hydroxylated surface and the SAMs formed on it, a four-phase model consisting of silicon substrate/SiO2/overlayer/air is assumed. The designed overlayers are assumed to be transparent; a generally reasonable approximation for organic layers with C-chains . Since the thickness and refractive index are highly correlated for very thin films (less than 10 nm), refractive index of the overlayer can be reasonably assumed and then thickness of the overlayer can be determined. Refractive indices as 3.8650 for Si substrate, 1.4605 for the SiO2 layer and 1.4600 for the TPDA layer in the model have been applied.
Results and Discussion
Effect of Dipping Time
The contact angle of water is sensitive to the polarity of the surface and may be used as an indication of hydrophilicity. The change in the contact angle has been used to describe roughly the variation in surface chemical composition of the substrate as well as the extent of the surface coverage . Figure 1 shows the variation of contact angle of the hydroxylated Si(001) surfaces as a function of dipping time in the TPDA solution, which were obtained in this study by using a sessile water drop technique. A clean Si surface has usually a contact angle less than 15–20°, which indicates its hydrophilic nature. As seen in Fig. 1, there was a steep increase in contact angle values when we were interacted these hydrophilic surfaces with the TPDA solution, due to hydrophobic chains of TPDA molecules (or oligomeric forms discussed above). Longer dipping times resulted higher contact angles, but a plateau value was reached around a dipping time of 12 h, which, most probably correspond full coverage of the substrate surface, as also discussed in the related literature recently [25–27]. For example, in the case of 1% (v/v) TPDA solution, the contact angle values are 33° and 52° for a dipping time of 1 and 3 h respectively, whereas the steady state value is 65 ° ± 2.1 (for a dipping time of 24 h) indicating the full surface coverage of TPDA molecules. These data are in good agreement with the contact angles measured for water on amino-terminated layers reported in the literature, which were in the range of 23–68° .
Effect of TPDA Concentration
Figure 3 also shows, in contrast to changes in the thickness, the variation of water contact angle of the Si(001) surfaces as a function of the TPDA concentration after treatment is quite significant. For example, in the cases of 0.5 and 2% TPDA concentrations, the contact angle values were 33.2° and 37.1°, respectively, while the difference at higher concentrations were not very significant and about 38 ° ± 0.4 (for a solution concentration of 8%). It seems that a 2% TPDA concentration was enough to form a monolayer covering the whole surface of the substrate in 2 h, which corresponds a contact angle value of 38°.
Effect of Solvent Type
Thicknesses and water contact angle values of TPDA on Si(001) in the different solvent types
Contact angle (°)
1.453 ± 0.015
37.4 ± 0.55
1.898 ± 0.021
44.3 ± 0.71
2.859 ± 0.014
41.2 ± 0.91
14.698 ± 0.016
57.7 ± 0.35
Amino-terminated self-assembled monolayers are currently used commonly in both industrial and research-oriented applications. Unfortunately, there is no clear and accepted explanation of the formation (neither the mechanisms nor the conditions) of SAM and/or multilayer on substrate surfaces. In this study, we have selected a well known surface, an hydroxylated Si(001) and investigated formation of SAMs (and or multilayer) of again a widely used precursor molecule, i.e.,N-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl) diethylenetriamine (TPDA) on these surfaces at different conditions. The dipping time was first parameter investigated in this study. Monolayers were formed in dipping times shorter than 2 h, longer periods resulted multilayer. In the experimental set up we were not able to analyze the multilayer structures. It was not also possible to describe the formation mechanisms. Two alternative pathways, formation of oligomers and then adsorption and reorientation (two-dimensional networking) on the surface is one of the mechanisms that one can propose. The other one is the formation of oligomers and their aggregates in the solution and then their adsorption onto the substrate surface as multilayer. Most probably, both mechanisms are occurring, but which one is contributing more we do not know, we are currently working on designing new experimental strategies to explain this behavior. It was observed that the precursor concentration within the dipping medium does not effect the thickness of the layers, however the changes in the contact angles with the solution concentration was significant and interestingly related to the surface coverage of the substrate. The type of the solvent was found an important parameter to control the monolayer formation. It seems that compatibility of the precursor molecules and solvent is important. If one selects the correct solvent, monolayers (or multilayer) with desired orientation can be reached, however this needs also further studies, which are under-investigation in our group as the extension of this study.
Authors would like to thank Gökçen Birlik Demirel for theoretical calculations. Gökhan Demirel was supported as a post-doctoral fellow by TÜBİTAK. Prof. Erhan Pişkin was supported by Turkish Academy of Sciences as a full member.
- Whitesides GM, Laibinis PE: Langmuir. 1990, 6: 87. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXmtlSqug%3D%3D] 10.1021/la00091a013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Colorado R, Lee TR: Langmuir. 2003, 19: 3288. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXit1Sjtr8%3D] 10.1021/la0263763View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pemberton JE: Langmuir. 2003, 19: 6422. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXktl2jt7w%3D] 10.1021/la034147qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burleigh TD, Gu Y, Donahey G, Vida M, Waldeck DH: Corrosion. 2001, 57: 1066. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXptVGqt7c%3D] 10.5006/1.3281678View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jenning GK, Yong TH, Munro JC, Laibinis PE: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2003, 125: 2950. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhtlSrtbg%3D] 10.1021/ja020233lView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Houston JE, Kim HI: Acc. Chem. Res.. 2002, 35: 547. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xjslyjtbc%3D] 10.1021/ar9801144View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petrenko VF, Peng S: Can. J. Phys.. 2003, 81: 387. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXkvV2rtb0%3D] 10.1139/p03-014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahn HS, Cuong PD, Park S, Kim YW, Lim JC: Wear. 2003, 255: 819. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXls1Ohsrc%3D] 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00192-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakano M, Ishida T, Numata T, Ando Y, Sasaki S: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1. 2003, 42: 4734. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmtlyjs7g%3D] 10.1143/JJAP.42.4734View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qian L, Tian F, Xiao X: Tribol. Lett.. 2003, 15: 169. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXls1Oltrk%3D] 10.1023/A:1024868532575View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sung IH, Yang JC, Kim DE, Shin BS: Wear. 2003, 255: 808. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXls1OhsrY%3D] 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00058-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang X, Perry SS: Langmuir. 2003, 19: 6135. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXkvVOmsrk%3D] 10.1021/la034354qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salomon A, Cahen D, Lindsay S, Tomfohr J, Engelkes VB, Frisbie CD: Adv. Mater.. 2003, 15: 1881. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1emsL4%3D] 10.1002/adma.200306091View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ostuni E, Yan L, Whitesides GM: Colloids Surf. B. 1999, 15: 3. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXltlCqtb0%3D] 10.1016/S0927-7765(99)00004-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Love JC, Wolfe DB, Chabinyc ML, Paul KE, Whitesides GM: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2002, 124: 1576. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xps1Wgug%3D%3D] 10.1021/ja012569lView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Love JC, Estroff LA, Kriebel JK, Nuzzo RG, Whitesides GM: Chem. Rev.. 2005, 105: 1103–1170. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXis1ahsrc%3D] 10.1021/cr0300789View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- G. Demirel, T. Caykara, B. Akaoglu, M. Cakmak, Surf. Sci. Accepted, (2007)Google Scholar
- D.E. Aspness, in ed. by E.D. Palik. Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, (Academic Pres, Orlando, 1985)Google Scholar
- Tortech L, Mekhalif Z, Delhalle J, Guittard F, Geribaldi S: Thin Solid Films. 2005, 491: 253. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVeks7nJ] 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.06.090View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Komeda T, Namba K, Nishioka Y: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1997, 70: 3398. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXksVSmtrg%3D] 10.1063/1.119183View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- G. Demirel, G. Birlik, M. C¸akmak, T. C¸aykara, S¸. Ellialtioglu, Surf. Sci. (in press, 2007)Google Scholar
- Hozumi A, Yokogawa Y, Kameyama T, Sugimura H, Hayashi K, Shirayama H, Takai O: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 2001, 19: 1812. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXltFCqtL4%3D] 10.1116/1.1336833View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sugimura H, Hozumi A, Kameyama T, Takai O: Surf. Interface. Anal.. 2002, 34: 550. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmvFOitLo%3D] 10.1002/sia.1358View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang F, Srinivasan MP: Langmuir. 2004, 20: 2309. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtlamsLw%3D] 10.1021/la0354638View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kulkarni SA, Mirji SA, Mandale AB, Gupta RP, Vijayamohanan KP: Mater. Lett.. 2005, 59: 3890. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFSmsrrO] 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.07.026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tillman N, Ulman A, Schildkraut JS, Penner TL: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1998, 111: 6136.Google Scholar
- Angst DL, Simmons GW: Langmuir. 1991, 7: 2236. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXlvFSntb0%3D] 10.1021/la00058a043View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin OM, Yu L, Mecozzi S: Chem. Commun.. 2005, 39: 4964. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVKju7zI] 10.1039/b506781bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nie HY, Walzak MJ, McIntyre NS: J. Phys. Chem.B. 2006, 110: 21101. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVShs7nO] 10.1021/jp062811gView ArticleGoogle Scholar