- Nano Ideas
- Open Access

# Double Rashba Quantum Dots Ring as a Spin Filter

- Feng Chi
^{1}Email author, - Xiqiu Yuan
^{1}and - Jun Zheng
^{1}

**Received:**11 August 2008**Accepted:**21 August 2008**Published:**3 September 2008

## Abstract

We theoretically propose a double quantum dots (QDs) ring to filter the electron spin that works due to the Rashba spin–orbit interaction (RSOI) existing inside the QDs, the spin-dependent inter-dot tunneling coupling and the magnetic flux penetrating through the ring. By varying the RSOI-induced phase factor, the magnetic flux and the strength of the spin-dependent inter-dot tunneling coupling, which arises from a constant magnetic field applied on the tunneling junction between the QDs, a 100% spin-polarized conductance can be obtained. We show that both the spin orientations and the magnitude of it can be controlled by adjusting the above-mentioned parameters. The spin filtering effect is robust even in the presence of strong intra-dot Coulomb interactions and arbitrary dot-lead coupling configurations.

## Keywords

- Quantum dots
- Spin filter
- Rashba spin–orbit interaction
- Spin-dependent inter-dot coupling

## Introduction

With the rapid progress in miniaturization of the solid-state devices, the effect of carriers’ spin in semiconductor has attracted considerable attention for its potential applications in photoelectric devices and quantum computing [1, 2]. The traditional standard method of spin control depends on the spin injection technique, with mainly relies on optical techniques and the usage of a magnetic field or ferromagnetic material. Due to its unsatisfactory efficiency in nano-scale structures [1, 3, 4], generating and controlling a spin-polarized current with all-electrical means in mesoscopic structures has been an actively researched topic in recent years. The electric field usually does not act on the spin. But if a device is formed in a semiconductor two-dimensional electron gas system with an asymmetrical-interface electric field, Rashba spin–orbit interaction (RSOI) will occur [5]. The RSOI is a relativistic effect at the low-speed limit and is essentially the influence of an external field on a moving spin [6, 7]. It can couple the spin degree of freedom to its orbital motion, thus making it possible to control the electron spin in a nonmagnetic way [8, 9]. Many recent experimental and theoretical works indicate that the spin-polarization based on the RSOI can reach as high as 100% [7, 10] or infinite [11–13], and then attracted a lot of interest.

Recently, an Aharnov-Bohm (AB) ring device, in which one or two quantum dots (QDs) having RSOI are located in its arms, is proposed to realize the spin-polarized transport. The QDs is a zero-dimensional device where various interactions exist and is widely investigated in recent years for its tunable size, shape, quantized energy levels, and carrier number [14–16]. A QDs ring has already been realized in experiments [17] and was used to investigate many important transport phenomena, such as the Fano and the Kondo effects [18, 19]. When the RSOI in the QDs is taken into consideration, the electrons flowing through different arms of the AB ring will acquire a spin-dependent phase factor in the tunnel-coupling strengths and results in different quantum interference effect for the spin-up and spin-down electrons [10, 13, 20, 21].

*t*

_{c}is the usual tunnel coupling strength, σΔ

*t*may arises from a constant magnetic field applied on the junction between the QDs [22], and the phase factor ϕ

_{ R }is induced by the RSOI in the QDs.

## Model and Method

*k*, spin index or ±1, and and energy ɛ

_{ k α}in the αth (α =

*L*

*R*) lead; creates (annihilates) an electron in dot

*i*with spin σ and energy ɛ

_{ i };

*U*

_{ i }is the Coulomb repulsion energy in dot

*i*with being the particle number operator, in the following we set

*U*

_{1}=

*U*

_{2}=

*U*for simplicity;

*t*

_{σ}describes the dot–dot tunneling coupling and the matrix elements

*t*

_{α}

*i*σ are assumed to be independent of

*k*for the sake of simplicity and take the forms of and The phase factor ϕ

_{ Ri }arises from the RSOI in dot

*i*, which is tunable in experiments [20, 23, 24]. In fact, the RSOI will also induce a inter-dot spin-flip, which has little impact on the current and is neglected here [25]. The spin-dependent tunnel-coupling strength (line-width function) between the dots and the leads is defined as Γ

_{ ij σ}

^{α}= 2π∑

_{ k }

*t*

_{αi σ}

*t*

_{αj σ}

^{*}δ(ɛ−ɛ

_{ k ασ}), (α =

*L*

*R*). According to Fig. 1, the matrix form of them read (here we set

*t*

_{ L 1}=

*t*

_{ R 2}=

*t*and

*t*

_{ R 1}=

*t*

_{ L 2}= λ

*t*)

where the spin-dependent phase factor ϕ_{σ} = φ−σϕ_{
R
}, with ϕ_{
R
} = ϕ_{
R 1}−ϕ_{
R 2}, this indicates that the tunnel-coupling strength only depends on the difference between ϕ_{
R 1} and ϕ_{
R 2}, and then one can assume that only one QD contains the RSOI, making the structure simpler and more favorable in experiments. The phase-independent tunnel-coupling strength is Γ = Γ^{
L
} + Γ^{
R
}, with Γ^{α} = 2π|*t*|^{2}ρ_{α}, and ρ_{α} is the density of states in the leads (the energy-dependence of ρ_{α} is neglected).

_{α}. The 2 × 2 matrices and

**G**

^{ r(a)}(ɛ) are, respectively, the lesser and the retarded (advanced) Green’s function in the Fourier space. We employ the equation of motion technique to calculate both the retarded and the lesser Green’s functions by adopting the Hartree-Fock truncation approximation, and arrive at the Dayson equation form for the retarded one [28]:

**g**

_{σ}

^{ r }(ɛ) for the isolated DQD are

*t*

_{c}. The advanced Green’s function

**G**

_{σ}

^{ a }(ɛ) is the Hermitian conjugate of

**G**

_{σ}

^{ r }(ɛ). The occupation number <

*n*

_{ i σ}> in Eq. 6 needs to be calculated self-consistently; its self-consistent equation is Within the same truncating approximation as that of the retarded Green’s function, the expression of can be simply written in the Keldysh form The matrix elements of the lesser self-energy are In general and thus Eq. 6 of the current is reduced to the Landauer-Büttiker formula for the non-interacting electrons [27]

and then the total transmission *T*
_{σ}(ɛ) for each spin component can be expressed as
The linear conductance *G*
_{σ}(ɛ) is related to the transmission *T*
_{σ}(ɛ) by the Landauer formula at zero temperature [28], *G*
_{σ}(ɛ) = (*e*
^{2}/*h*)*T*
_{σ}(ɛ).

## Results and Discussion

In the following numerical calculations, we set the temperature*T* = 0 throughout the article. The local density of states in the leads ρ is chosen to be 1 and*t* = 0.4 so that the corresponding linewidth
is set to be the energy unit.

*G*

_{σ}and spin polarization on the Fermi level ɛ for λ =

*U*= 0 and various Δ

*t*. The two dots now are connected in a serial configuration and the conductance of each spin component is composed of two Breit-Wigner resonances peaked at respectively [18, 21]. Since the phase factors originating from both the magnetic flux and the RSOI do not play any role, the device is free from their influences. When Δ

*t*= 0, the spin-up and spin-down conductances are the same and the spin polarization

*p*= 0 as shown by the solid lines in the three figures. With increasing Δ

*t*, the distance between the spin-up resonances is enhanced whereas that between the spin-down ones is shrunk because of as shown in Fig. 2a, b. Meanwhile, the spin polarization

*p*increases accordingly. If Δ

*t*is set to be Δ

*t*=

*t*

_{c}, the spin-up and spin-down inter-dot tunneling coupling strengths are and respectively. Then the spin-up conductance has a finite value but meanwhile as the conduction channel for the spin-down electrons breaks off, which is shown by the dot-dashed lines in Fig. 2a, b. The spin orientation of the non-zero conductance can be readily reversed by tuning the direction of the magnetic field, which is applied on the tunnel junction between the dots, to set Δ

*t*= −

*t*

_{ c }.

*t*=

*t*

_{c}and φ = ϕ

_{ R }= π/2, the spin-down conductance remains to be zero for any λ, and then only is plotted. For non-zero λ, the transmission

*T*

_{σ}(ɛ) is

_{0}= ɛ

_{1}= ɛ

_{2}. Since and the spin-down transmission regardless of the choice of λ. The spin-up conductance is composed of one broad Breit-Wigner and one asymmetric Fano resonance centered, respectively, at the bonding and antibonding states [18, 21]. Detail investigation of this spin-dependent Fano line-shape can be found in our previous papers and we do not discuss it anymore here. It should be indicated that the spin orientation of the nonzero conductance can be reversed by setting Δ

*t*= −

*t*

_{c}and φ = −π/2 + 2

*n*π with

*n*is an integer.

_{ R }= 0 and plot the two spin components conductance by varying Δ

*t*and the magnetic flux-induced phase factor φ. Figure 5a shows that when Δ

*t*=

*t*

_{c}and φ = π + 2

*n*π with

*n*is an integer, the conductance of the spin-up electrons still has finite value whereas that of the spin-down electrons is exactly zero. Moreover, to swap the spin direction of the non-zero conductance, one can simply tune Δ

*t*from

*t*

_{c}to −

*t*

_{c}with unchanged magnetic flux as shown in Fig. 5b. The peaks’ width and position of the non-zero conductance in Fig. 5a, b are the same, indicating that one can flip the electron spin in the bonding and antibonding states without affecting its sate properties.

## Conclusion

In conclusion, we have investigated the spin filtering effect in a double QDs device, in which the two dots are coupled to external leads in a configuration transiting from serial-to-parallel geometry. We show that by properly adjusting the spin-dependent inter-dot tunneling coupling strength*t*
_{σ}, a net spin-up or spin-down conductance can be obtained with or without the help of the RSOI and the magnetic flux. The spin direction of the non-zero conductance can be manipulated by varying the signs of*t*
_{σ}. The above means of spin control can be fulfilled for a fixed RSOI-induced phase factor, and then the QDs in the present system can be either a gated or a self-assembly one, making it easier to be realized in current experiments.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 10647101 and 10704011).

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Zh. M. Wang, Self-Assembled Quantum Dots (Springer, New York, 2008); E.Y. Tsymbal, O. Mryasov, P.R. LeClair, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, R109 (2003); I. zutic, J. Fabian, S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- D. Loss, D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998); A. Imamoglu, D.D. Awschalom, G. Burkard, D.P. DiVincenzo, D. Loss, M. Sherwin, A. Small, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4204 (1999)Google Scholar
- I. Zutic, J. Fabian, S. Das Sarma, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1558 (2001); I.Zutic, J. Fabian, S. Das Sarma, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 221 (2003); S.S. Li, K. Chang, J.B. Xia, Phys. Rev. B 68, 245306 (2003)Google Scholar
- Murayama A, Asahina T, Nishibayashi K, Souma I, Oka Y:
*Appl. Phys. Lett.*. 2006,**88:**23114. 10.1063/1.2164387View ArticleGoogle Scholar - E.I. Rashba, Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) 2, 1224 (1960) [Sov. Phys. Solid State 2, 1109 (1960)]; Y.A. Bychkov, E. I. Rashba, J. Phys. C 17, 6039 (1984)Google Scholar
- S. Datta, B. Das, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 665 (1990); S.S. Li, J. B. Xia, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 022102 (2008)Google Scholar
- B. Molnar, P. Vasilopoulos, F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 72, 075330 (2005); P.Foldi, O. Kalman, M.G. Benedict, F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. 73, 155325 (2006); O. Kalman, P. Foldi, M.G. Benedict, F.M. Peeters, Physica E 40, 567 (2008); M.W. Wu, J. Zhou, Q.W. Shi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1012 (2004)Google Scholar
- Q.F. Sun, X.C. Xie, Phys. Rev. B 71, 155321 (2005); Q.F. Sun, X.C. Xie, Phys. Rev. B 73, 235301 (2006)Google Scholar
- F. Chi, J.L. Liu, L.L. Sun, Y.J. Gao, Phys. Lett. A 363, 302 (2007); F. Chi, J. Zheng, Superlatt. Microstruct. 43, 375 (2008)Google Scholar
- F. Chi, S.S. Li, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 113703 (2006); F. Chi, J. Zheng, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 062106 (2008)Google Scholar
- J.E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1834 (1999); S. Murakami, N. Nagaosa, S.C. Zhang, Science 301, 1348 (2003); Y.K. Kato, R.C. Myers, A.C. Gossard, D.D. Awschalom, Science 306, 1910 (2004); J. Wunderlich, B. Kaestner, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 47204 (2005)Google Scholar
- Y.X. Xing, Q.F. Sun, J. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 73, 205339 (2006); Y.X. Xing, Q.F. Sun, J. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 75, 075324 (2007); Y.X. Xing, Q.F. Sun, J. Wang, 77, 115346 (2008)Google Scholar
- H.F. Lu, Y. Guo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 062109 (2008); F. Chi, J. Zheng, L.L. Sun, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 172104 (2008)Google Scholar
- van der Wiel WG, De Franceschi S, Elzerman JM, Fujisawa T, Tarucha S, Kouwenhoven LP:
*Rev. Mod. Phys.*. 2003,**75:**1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar - J.H. Lee, Zh.M. Wang, N.W. Strm, Y.I. Mazur, G.J. Salamo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 202101 (2006); M. Hankea, M. Schmidbauer, D. Grigoriev, P. Sta¨fer, R. Kohler, T.H. Metzger, Zh.M. Wang, Yu.I. Mazur, G.J. Salamo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 053116 (2006)Google Scholar
- S.S. Li, A. Abliz, F.H. Yang, Z.C. Niu, S.L. Feng, J.B. Xia, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 6662 (2002); S.S. Li, A. Abliz, F.H. Yang, Z.C. Niu, S.L. Feng, J.B. Xia, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 5402 (2003); S.S. Li, J.B. Xia, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 092119 (2007)Google Scholar
- Holleitner AW, Decker CR, Qin H, Eberl K, Blick RH:
*Phys. Rev. Lett.*. 2001,**87:**256802. COI number [1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnptlCmug%3D%3D] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.256802View ArticleGoogle Scholar - M.L. Ladron de Guevara, F. Claro, P.A. Orellana 1, Phys. Rev. B 67, 195335 (2003); P.A. Orellana, M.L. Ladron de Guevara, F. Claro, Phys. Rev. 70, 233315 (2004); K. Kang, S. Y. Cho, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, 117 (2004); Z.M. Bai, M.F. Yang, Y.C. Chen, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, 2053 (2004)Google Scholar
- J.C. Chen, A.M. Chang, M.R. Melloch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 176801 (2004); H.F. Lu, Y. Guo, Phys. Rev. B 76, 045120 (2007)Google Scholar
- Sun QF, Wang J, Guo H:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2005,**71:**165310. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.165310View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chi F, Liu JL, Sun LL:
*J. Appl. Phys.*. 2007,**101:**093704. 10.1063/1.2720097View ArticleGoogle Scholar - A.K. Huttel, S. Ludwig, H. Lorenz, K. Eberl, J.P. Kotthaus, Phys. Rev. B 72, 081310 (2005); Z.J. Li, Y.H. Jin, Y.H. Nie, J.Q. Liang, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 085214 (2008)Google Scholar
- Nitta J, Akazaki T, Takayanagi H, Enoki T:
*Phys. Rev. Lett.*. 1997,**78:**1335. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXht1Ghsbs%3D] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1335View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Mireles F, Kirczenow G:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2001,**64:**024426. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.024426View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gong WJ, Zheng YS, Lü TQ:
*Appl. Phys. Lett.*. 2008,**92:**042104. 10.1063/1.2838310View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jauho AP, Wingreen NS, Meir Y:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 1994,**50:**5528. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXmsVamt7k%3D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.5528View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lu HZ, Lü R, Zhu BF:
*J. Phys.: Condens. Matter*. 2006,**18:**8961. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtFGhsrjP] 10.1088/0953-8984/18/39/025Google Scholar - Datta S:
*Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems*. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1997.Google Scholar