Skip to main content

Water-Driven Assembly of Laser Ablation-Induced Au Condensates as Mesomorphic Nano- and Micro-Tubes


Reddish Au condensates, predominant atom clusters and minor amount of multiply twinned particles and fcc nanoparticles with internal compressive stress, were produced by pulsed laser ablation on gold target in de-ionized water under a very high power density. Such condensates were self-assembled as lamellae and then nano- to micro-diameter tubes with multiple walls when aged at room temperature in water for up to 40 days. The nano- and micro-tubes have a lamellar- and relaxed fcc-type wall, respectively, both following partial epitaxial relationship with the co-existing multiply twinned nanoparticles. The entangled tubes, being mesomorphic with a large extent of bifurcation, flexibility, opaqueness, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering, may have potential encapsulated and catalytic/label applications in biomedical systems.


Under ambient pressure condition, Au atoms condense in the order of increasing particle size, as structural motifs of atom clusters with planar, cage or pyramid structures [13], an anomalous multiply twinned particle (MTP) of decahedral (Dh) and icosahedron (Ih) types [4, 5] and a face-centered cubic (fcc) structure. On the other hand, helical gold rolling into multi-shell nanowire [6] and nanotube [7] was demonstrated via a top–down approach such as electron beam thinning.

Pulsed laser ablation (PLA) technique with a very rapid heating/cooling and hence pressure effect, as in the syntheses of dense dioxide nanocondensates with considerable internal stress [8], has been used to fabricate Au nanocondensates [9]. A high laser power density was found to cause atom clusters in addition to much larger sized MTP/fcc nanocondensates [9].

Here we used an alternative route of pulsed laser ablation in liquid (PLAL) to form more Au atom clusters for further formation of lamellae and then multiple-walled tubes (MWT) in a subsequent water-driven assembly process. This stabilizer-free approach is analogous to the fabrication of carbon onions via arc discharge in water [10], but different from surfactant/copolymers or other template-assisted assembly of Au nanoparticles in a desired manner and quantum-size-related properties for applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology [11, 12]. The self-assembled Au tube has potential biomedical applications in view of its good bending flexibility, partial epitaxial filling of MTP/fcc particles, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) effect useful for the detection of molecules or nanoparticles adsorbed on rough metal surfaces [13, 14].

Experimental Section

PLAL Synthesis and Further Aging of Au Nanocondensates

To produce Au nanocondensates, Au (99.99% pure, 0.3 mm in thickness) foil immersed in de-ionized (DI) water within a glass beaker was subjected to energetic Nd-YAG-laser (Lotis, 1,064 nm in wavelength, beam mode: TEM00) pulse irradiation for up to 3,000 pulses inside an ablation chamber under the laser parameters compiled in Table 1. A relatively high power density of 1.4 × 1012 W/cm2(i.e., pulsed energy 650 mJ/pulse; pulse duration 16 ns; beam size 0.03 mm2; fluence 2.2 kJ/cm2; frequency 10 Hz under Q-switch mode) caused a larger yield of atom clusters as a colloidal solution. The reddish solution was then settled in capped vial for up to 40 days in desiccators or open air in order to study the influence of moisture on the assembly and migration of the resultant MWTs.

Table 1 Laser ablation parameters and resultant phase assemblages of Au via PLAL


The optical absorbance of the as-deposited nanocondensates and further developed MWTs in solution with specified dwelling times was acquired by a UV–vis spectrophotometer (U-3900H, Hitachi) operating at an instrumental resolution of 0.1 nm in the range of 300–800 nm. The powders recovered from such samples were dried for microstructure observations using optical polarized microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-6700F, 10 kV, 10 μA). The crystal structure of the MWTs was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Siemens D5000, Cu Kα, 40 kV, 30 mA, at 0.05° and 3 s per step from 2θ angle for 30° up to 90°). The d-spacings measured from XRD trace were used for least-squares refinement of the lattice parameters with an error ±0.0001 nm using bulk gold reflections as a standard. Field emission transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai G2 F20 at 200 kV) with selected area electron diffraction (SAED), and point-count energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis at a beam size of 1 nm was used to study the composition and phases of the tubular walls. Lattice imaging coupled with two-dimensional (2-D) Fourier transform and inverse transform were used to study the rolling planes of the MWT and their partial epitaxy relationship with the associated MTP/fcc nanoparticles. Powdery sample mixed with KBr was studied by FTIR (Bruker 66v/S) for the extent of OHsignature on MWT. As for the SERS effect, the powdery MWTs settled on a vitreous SiO2substrate were studied by micro-Raman in a backscattering geometry by a Jobin Yvon T64000 system working in the triple-subtractive mode.


Optical Absorbance of the Condensate Solution

The colloidal Au solution as formed via PLAL is reddish under the naked eye (Fig. 1). The corresponding surface plasmon absorbance near 525 nm is similar to that of the Au nanoparticles and clusters in aqueous or solvent-protected solution [15, 16]. Room-temperature aging of the solution for up to 40 days caused progressive lowering of the absorbance peak because more opaque materials were deposited at the bottom and even along the humidified wall of the capped bottle especially when desiccated (Fig. 1). The opaque materials are in fact mesomorphic lamellae and MWTs as indicated by the following electron microscopic observations.

Figure 1
figure 1

Color change of reddish colloidal Au solutions.a Produced via PLAL followed by further aging in desiccators for up to 40 days (fromleft to right) to deposit opaque materials, i.e., lamellae and microtubes (cf. text).b Corresponding optical absorption spectra (fromtop to bottom) showing gradual lowering of the absorbance peak near 525 nm, in accordance with the sedimentation of lamellae and then tubular materials at the expense of atom clusters

Structural Development of Nanocondensates upon Aging in Water

The powdery materials retrieved from the colloidal Au solution having been processed by PLAL were agglomerated as nanoparticle chain aggregate (NCA), as shown by the TEM bright field image (BFI) in Fig. 2a. The individual atom clusters and MTP/fcc particles within the NCA were imaged (Fig. 2b, c) using the low-angle scattering halo (Fig. 2d) and the nearly superimposed strong {111}/{200} diffractions of the MTP/fcc (Fig. 2d), respectively. The diffraction intensity profile (Fig. 2e) further showed that the low-angle scattering of the atom clusters falls in the range of 1.46–1.78 Q−1 full width at half-height, analogous to that of the polished Beilby layers [17] or Au foil on the verge of melting [18]. EDX analysis on the nanocondensates (Fig. 2f) showed Au peaks, with the remaining peaks from the supporting carbon-coated collodion film and Cu grid. This result indicates that oxidation or contamination of the Au nanocondensates is negligible.

Figure 2
figure 2

TEM of Au nanocondensates produced via PLAL on Au target at 1.4 × 1012 W/cm2.a BFI,b,c dark field images using low-angle scattering and nearly superimposed {111}/{200} diffractions, respectively, as circled in SAED pattern in (d) with corresponding intensity profiles in (e), to show atom clusters (denoted asAC) and MTP/fcc particles, respectively.f Point-count EDX spectrum of the Au nanocondensates showing Au counts with negligible O and impurities. The Cu count is from the sample supporting copper grid and C from carbon-coated collodion film

After aging for 10 days in water, the Au atom clusters were self-assembled as corrugated lamellae as shown by the TEM BFI in Fig. 3a. The SAED pattern (Fig. 3b) and corresponding diffraction intensity profile (Fig. 3c) showed a broad diffraction near 1.63 nm−1for atom clusters, a sharp diffraction at 2.84 nm−1for Au nanotubes and broad diffractions near 4.21, 4.65, 6.96, 7.96 nm−1for (111), (200), (220), and (311) of MTP/fcc nanoparticles, respectively. Lattice images further indicated the lamellae are bifurcated and entangled (Fig. 3d), yet having lamellar layer nearly parallel to (200) and/or (111) of MTP (Fig. 3e, f), i.e., following partial epitaxy relationship.

Figure 3
figure 3

TEM of corrugated lamellae derived from the condensed atom clusters in Fig. 2by further room-temperature aging for 10 days in water.a,b BFI and SAED pattern.c Intensity profile across the diffraction rings in SAED pattern showing diffractions of atomic clusters (denoted asAC), nanotubes (denoted asT) and MTP/fcc nanoparticles with (hkl) specified.d Lattice imaging shows bifurcation/entanglement of the lamellae as well as (e) and (f) partial epitaxy nucleation of the lamellae from MTP having one of the penetrating lamellar layer sets (denoted as blackdotted lines) nearly parallel to (200) and (111) of MTP, respectively

The final products after aging for 40 days in water are tubular Au wires which are about 2–5 μm in width and several hundreds of micrometers in length as indicated by SEM observation (Fig. 4a). The microtubes showed extensive branches and entanglement having walls decorated with Au nanoparticles when imaged at a higher magnification (Fig. 4b). TEM further showed that the microtubes are either uncapped or capped (Fig. 4c, d) having randomly oriented fcc-type domains in the wall, and a hollow core of such tubes was manifested by a relative weak diffraction in the center of the tubes. XRD trace (Fig. 4e) and the structure refinement of the d-spacings further indicated that the fcc-type wall newly assembled from atom clusters has a rather relaxed lattice parameter (a = 0.4075 nm) close to the ambient value (a = 0.4079 nm, JCPDS file 04-0784). By contrast, there is a much smaller SAED lattice parameter (0.402 ± 0.002 nm) for the as-formed fcc nanocondensates than the relaxed fcc-type wall of the microtubes (a = 0.408 ± 0.002 nm) implying a significant internal stress as discussed later.

Figure 4
figure 4

Microstructures of the Au microtubes revealed by (a), (b) SEM secondary electron images at low and high magnifications, respectively; (c), (d) TEM BFI of the capped and uncapped Au microtubes, respectively, both having polycrystalline wall of fcc structure as indicated by a representative SAED pattern inset; (e) XRD pattern (CuKα) of the bifurcated Au microtubes with fcc-type wall. Such tubular materials were developed from the Au nanocondensates fabricated by PLAL under Q-switch mode followed by 40 days dwelling in the same aqueous solution at room temperature

Further TEM scrutiny revealed a typical nanotube with a varied diameter ranging from ~100 nm on the one end to less than 10 nm on the other end (Fig. 5a). The BFIs magnified from the specified regions of the nanotube showed encapsulated fcc and MTP nanoparticles which have much stronger diffraction contrast than the lamellar wall (Fig. 5b, c). The identity of lamellae within the corrugated wall of the MTP/fcc encapsulated nanotube was confirmed by high-resolution TEM image (Fig. 5d) and corresponding SAED pattern (Fig. 5e) coupled with intensity profile (Fig. 5f). Point-count EDX analysis on the lamellar wall with weak Bragg diffraction contrast, i.e., immune from fcc/MTP nanoparticles, showed Au counts without appreciable oxygen and impurities.

Figure 5
figure 5

Microstructures of a typical Au nanotube. (a) TEM BFI showing a varied diameter ranging from ~100 nm on the one end to less than 10 nm on the other end. (b), (c) BFIs magnified from regions indicated byarrows showing encapsulated fcc/MTP nanoparticles with strong Bragg diffraction contrast. (d) Lattice image taken from the bridge (arrow) in (a) showing the nanotube has four defective lamellar layers nearly edge on in the wall and a hollow core with the lamellar wall intop view. (e), (f) Corresponding SAED pattern and intensity profile showing strong broad diffractions with maximum intensity at 2.45, 4.58, and 8.74 cm−1, i.e., plane interspacing 0.408, 0.218, and 0.114 nm, for the tubular lamella wall, nearly superimposed (111)/(200) and (311)-motif of the encapsulated MTP/fcc, respectively. The MTP/fcc encapsulated tubes are Au without appreciable oxygen and impurities according to EDX spectrum inset. The same specimen as in Fig. 4

Optical Properties and Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering of Au Microtubes

The hollow core and optically isotropic wall of the Au microtubes were manifested by optical polarized microscopic observation under a single polarizer and crossed polarizers, respectively (not shown). The wall of such microtubes showed significant light reflection despite the dark appearance of the sediments under the naked eye. The absence of metallic luster for the microtubes can be attributed to the surface roughness and defects of the wall.

The Raman shift of the as-formed Au condensates and subsequently assembled microtubes on a substrate of vitreous silica showed a significant SERS effect (Fig. 6). The vitreous silica alone is characterized by the vibrational D1 and D2 Raman bands at 488 and 599 cm−1 (Fig. 6a), which have been assigned to small planar ring [19] and/or paracrystalline cluster interface [20]. When such a substrate was overlaid with the as-formed Au condensates (blue trace in Fig. 6b) or subsequently assembled Au microtubes (red trace in Fig. 6b), both D1, D2, and minor unidentified bands became one to two-orders-of magnitude higher. In both cases, the D1 mode shift significantly because of the selection rules [21]. It should be noted that the SERS effect is more pronounced to have a higher signal to noise ratio for the assembled Au microtubes than the as-formed Au condensates. The OH signature of the microtubes was indicated by a typical FTIR spectrum showing a significant peak near 3,432 cm−1 (Fig. 6c) which can be assigned as OH stretching vibration [22].

Figure 6
figure 6

Vibrational spectrum of the deposit of Au microtubes on vitrous silica. a b Raman shift of vitreous silica without and with the deposit of the as-formed Au condensates (blue trace) and subsequently assembled Au microtubes (red trace, the same material as in Fig. 4), respectively, showing surface-enhanced Raman scattering of D1 and D2 modes (cf. text), and minor unidentified bands, c FTIR spectrum showing OH stretching vibration near 3432 cm−1[22]


Comparison of Au Condensates via PLAL vs. PLA

In comparison with that fabricated by PLA [9], The present Au condensates via PLAL have much more atom clusters than MTP and fcc. This can be attributed to an order-of-magnitude higher heating-cooling rate (ca. 1 × 1010 K/s) for PLAL [23] than PLA process and hence a pressure effect to form smaller sized nanocondensates. Base on Birch–Murnaghan equation of state and relevant bulk modulus B0 = 166.7 GPa as well as its pressure derivative B0′ = 5.48 for bulk fcc Au at zero pressure and 298 K [24, 25], the internal compressive stress of the as-formed fcc nanocondensates was calculated to increase up to ~8 GPa with the increase of PLAL power density (Table 1).

A high quenching rate of laser-induced plasma in confining liquid was known to cause metastable phase, such as diamond, that is thermodynamically stable in high-temperature high-pressure regime [26]. The estimated compressive stress level up to ca. 8 GPa is not high enough to stabilize the high-pressure hcp phase, which typically occurs above ~240 GPa at ambient temperature [27]. The reasons to retain a high internal stress for the fcc nanocondensates may include a very high quenching rate, the capillarity force under nanosize effect, and the constraint exerted by partially epitaxial MTPs. It should be noted that the internal stress remained nearly unchanged for the fcc nanocondensates after room-temperature aging for 40 days in water (not shown). The relaxed fcc-type wall of the microtubes thus has nothing to do with such nanocondensates. Instead, they were derived from atom clusters through an intermediate lamellar phase. The driving force for the formation of such a mesomorphic phase was likely total surface reduction under the influence of water for hydrogen-bonding related coordination change of Au atoms.

Water-Driven Rolling and Transformation of Lamellae in the Absence of Surfactant

The present Au nano- and micro-tubes were able to develop from atom clusters and then lamellae for further rolling in aqueous solution without the assistance of artificial surfactant for the following reasons. The atom clusters were likely self-assembled into lamellae under the influence of hydration effect, as indicated by OH stretching mode in the FTIR spectrum (Fig. 6c), in order to reduce the exposed surface area and to modify the structure of nanoparticles as the case of other materials [28]. The mesomorphic rolling of the Au lamella was then triggered by the mismatch strain of its structure units with considerable distortion and residual stress due to a dynamic PLAL process. The lamellae could possibly be made of atom clusters in the form of trigonal planar and pentagonal pyramid with electron positive ligands that donate electron density to the relativistically contracted and stabilized Au 6s orbital, and thus enhance the aurophilic interactions [29], or alternatively distorted hexagon as a precursor of fcc structure motif. In any case, the anisotropic strain among the randomly distributed atom clusters with directional ligands throughout the network would cause the lamella to roll up in order to minimize the dangling bonds analogous to the case of carbon nanotubes [30]. Such energetic favorable rolling of the structural units is also adopted by viruses, Buckminster fullerene [30], and chrysotile, a well-known fiber tubular mineral having is curvature determined by the degree of mismatch between the cations occupying the tetrahedral and octahedral layers [31].

It should be noted that the lamellar wall turned into fcc-type structure when the nanotubes were coarsened up to microns in diameter. This indicates that size dependent chemical free energy is of concern to form a more stable close packed structure for the tube wall. A partial epitaxial nucleation route by (111) or (200)MTP//lamella layer may also lower the activation energy for the lamellar wall to change into fcc structure.

Phase Behavior of Hydrophilic Au Microtubes

The mesomorphic Au microtubes were able to migrate along the humidified wall of the capped bottle especially when desiccated. This indicates that the outer surface of the Au microtube is hydrophilic. This hydration nature is in drastic contrast with the case of carbon nano-onions floating on the water surface or falling to the bottom of the container [10], and carbon nanotubes by PECVD or pyrolysis in the absence of surfactant [32, 33]. Still, it is not clear if the Au nanotube has hydrophobic channel for tight hydrogen-bonding network facilitated conduction of water analogous to the case of carbon nanotube with the channel occupancy and conductivity tunable by the change in the local polarity and solvent condition [34].

Concluding Remarks

As a final remark, PLAL is an effective process to fabricate atom clusters for further water-driven assembly of lamellae which rolled into tubular materials under the influence of atom clusters misfit strain and hydration effect. The resultant Au microtubes with a large extent of bifurcation, inner wall exposure, and flexibility as well as SERS effect may have potential encapsulated and catalytic/label applications in biomedical systems. Further study is required to clarify if the PLAL synthesis of semiconducting nano- and micron-tubes can be extended to other noble metals.

(See supplementary material 1)


  1. Johansson MP, Sundholm D, Vaara J: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.. 2004, 43: 2678. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXksVCgtLw%3D] 10.1002/anie.200453986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gu X, Ji M, Wei SH, Gong XG: Phys. Rev. B. 2004, 70: 205401. Bibcode number [2004PhRvB..70t5401G] Bibcode number [2004PhRvB..70t5401G] 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.205401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bulusu S, Li X, Wang LS, Zeng XC: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006, 103: 8326. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XlvFChsbc%3D]; Bibcode number [2006PNAS..103.8326B] 10.1073/pnas.0600637103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Iijima S, Ichihashi T: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1986, 56: 616. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL28XhtVSjsrg%3D]; Bibcode number [1986PhRvL..56..616I] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buffat PA, Flüeli M, Spycher R, Stadelmann P, Borel JP: Faraday Discuss. 1991, 92: 173. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXhtlKluro%3D] 10.1039/fd9919200173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kondo Y, Takayanagi K: Science. 2000, 289: 606. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXls1eksbc%3D]; Bibcode number [2000Sci...289..606K] 10.1126/science.289.5479.606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oshima Y, Onga A, Takayanagi K: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2003, 91: 205503. Bibcode number [2003PhRvL..91t5503O] Bibcode number [2003PhRvL..91t5503O] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.205503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen SY, Shen P: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2002, 89: 096106. Bibcode number [2002PhRvL..89i6106C] Bibcode number [2002PhRvL..89i6106C] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.096106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang CN, Chen SY, Zheng Y, Shen P: J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008, 112: 14965. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVGnurnP] 10.1021/jp805254h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sano N, Wang H, Chhowalla M, Alexandrou I, Amaratunga GAJ: Nature. 2001, 414: 506. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXptFektrg%3D]; Bibcode number [2001Natur.414..506S] 10.1038/35107141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim M, Sohn K, Na HB, Hyeon T: Nano. Lett.. 2002, 2: 1383. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XotFKktLY%3D]; Bibcode number [2002NanoL...2.1383K] 10.1021/nl025820j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daniel MC, Astruc D: Chem. Rev.. 2004, 104: 293. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXpvFGlur0%3D] 10.1021/cr030698+

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee PC, Meisel D: J. Phys. Chem.. 1982, 86: 3391. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL38Xksl2nu7s%3D] 10.1021/j100214a025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nie S, Emory SR: Science. 1997, 275: 1102. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXhtlGlsL4%3D] 10.1126/science.275.5303.1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Link S, El-Sayed MA: J. Phys. Chem. B. 1999, 103: 4212. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXivVart78%3D] 10.1021/jp984796o

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Templeton AC, Pietron JJ, Murray RW, Mulvaney P: J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000, 104: 564. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXotFGkt7g%3D] 10.1021/jp991889c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nonaka K, Kohra K: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.. 1954, 9: 512. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaG2MXntlaisA%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1954JPSJ....9..512N] 10.1143/JPSJ.9.512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki T: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.. 1950, 10: 1026. Bibcode number [1955JPSJ...10.1026S] Bibcode number [1955JPSJ...10.1026S] 10.1143/JPSJ.10.1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Galeener FL: J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1982, 49: 53. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL38XkvFKqtbc%3D]; Bibcode number [1982JNCS...49...53G] 10.1016/0022-3093(82)90108-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Phillips JC: J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1984, 63: 347. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXitVSjurY%3D]; Bibcode number [1984JNCS...63..347P] 10.1016/0022-3093(84)90102-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moskovits M, Suh JS: J. Phys. Chem.. 1984, 88: 5526. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXmtVSntL4%3D] 10.1021/j150667a013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Putnis A, Winkler B, Fernandez-Diaz L: Mineral. Mag.. 1990, 54: 123. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXhsVaru7w%3D] 10.1180/minmag.1990.054.374.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saito K, Takatani K, Sakka T, Ogata YH: Appl. Surf. Sci.. 2002, 197–198: 56. 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00303-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heinz DL, Jeanloz R: J. Appl. Phys.. 1984, 55: 885. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXptFOltw%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1984JAP....55..885H] 10.1063/1.333139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahuja R, Rekhi S, Johansson B: Phys. Rev. B. 2001, 63: 212101. Bibcode number [2001PhRvB..63u2101A] Bibcode number [2001PhRvB..63u2101A] 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.212101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang GW: Prog. Mater. Sci.. 2007, 52: 648. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXitlOltbc%3D] 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dubrovinsky L, Dubrovinskaia N, Crichton WA, Mikhaylushkin AS, Simak SL, Abrikosov IA, de Almeida JS, Ahuja R, Luo W, Johansson B: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2007, 98: 045503. ; COI number [1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7lvVyisg%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [2007PhRvL..98d5503D] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.045503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang H, Gilbert B, Huang F, Banfield JF: Nature. 2003, 424: 1025. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmslSjsbk%3D]; Bibcode number [2003Natur.424.1025Z] 10.1038/nature01845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwerdtfeger P: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.. 2003, 42: 1892. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjvFGgs70%3D] 10.1002/anie.200201610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Harris PJF: Carbon nanotubes and related structures: new materials for the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press, New York; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Putnis A: Introduction to mineral science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Joseph P, Cottin-Bizonne C, Benoit JM, Ybert C, Journet C, Tabeling P, Bocquet L: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2006, 97: 156104. ; COI number [1:STN:280:DC%2BD28jitlWktw%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [2006PhRvL..97o6104J] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.156104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li H, Wang X, Song Y, Liu Y, Li Q, Jiang L, Zhu D: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40: 1743. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjslCgs7g%3D] 10.1002/1521-3773(20010504)40:9<1743::AID-ANIE17430>3.0.CO;2-#

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hummer G, Rasaiah JC, Noworyta JP: Nature. 2001, 414: 188. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXosFait7k%3D]; Bibcode number [2001Natur.414..188H] 10.1038/35102535

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr. R.H. Hsu for helpful discussion on UV–visible spectrum and an anonymous referee for constructive comments. This work was supported by Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology at NSYSU and National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pouyan Shen.

Electronic supplementary material


Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11671-009-9359-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. (DOCX 312 KB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, CN., Chen, SY., Zheng, Y. et al. Water-Driven Assembly of Laser Ablation-Induced Au Condensates as Mesomorphic Nano- and Micro-Tubes. Nanoscale Res Lett 4, 1064 (2009).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Gold
  • Nanocondensates
  • Nanotubes
  • Self-assembly
  • Water