Avoiding Loss of Catalytic Activity of Pd Nanoparticles Partially Embedded in Nanoditches in SiC Nanowires
© to the authors 2009
Received: 28 September 2009
Accepted: 28 October 2009
Published: 15 November 2009
Nanoditches from selective etching of periodically twinned SiC nanowires were employed to hinder the migration and coalescence of Pd nanoparticles supported on the nanowires, and thus to improve their catalytic stability for total combustion of methane. The results show that the etched Pd/SiC catalyst can keep the methane conversion of almost 100% while the unetched one has an obvious decline in the catalytic activity from 100 to 82% after ten repeated reaction cycles. The excellent catalytic stability originates from the limitation of the nanoditches to the migration and growth of Pd nanoparticles.
Noble metal nanoparticles dispersed on inert supports usually exhibit high chemical activity in heterogeneous catalyst as well as fuel cell applications. However, the metal nanoparticles migrate and aggregate easily on the supports, thus their chemical activity decreases rapidly. For example, the growth of Pt nanoparticles in the cathode catalyst of fuel cell is one of the major factors resulting in the degradation of catalytic performance [1, 2]. Au nanoparticles with a size below 5 nm exhibit very high catalytic activity, and their catalytic activity shows a sharp reduction when the particle size becomes larger than 5 nm [3, 4]. Similarly, the increase in activity of Pd-based catalysts is found to depend on the decrease of the size of PdO crystallites [5, 6]. In addition, the deactivation of catalysts can be aggravated by the coke deposition, which is formed more easily over larger metal particles . Therefore, the control of migration and aggregation of metal nanoparticles on the supports remains a challenging problem in heterogeneous catalysis. Recently, different routes have been proposed to improve their stability. The Somorjai group designed a high-temperature-stable model catalytic system consisting of a Pt core coated with a mesoporous silica shell and found that the core–shell particles exhibited high catalytic activity and stability . The same group also proposed to stabilize Rh nanoparticle catalyst using poly(vinylpyrrolidone) for CO oxidation . The Xia group designed Pt–Pd bimetallic nanodendrites to stabilize Pt nanoparticles . In industrial catalysts, a practicable solution to the problem is to enhance the interaction between metals and supports by modification of the support surface; however, the metal nanoparticles may react with the supports or modifiers to form low-activity phases, and resulting in a decrease of their catalytic activity [11, 12].
Catalytic combustion of methane is the process in which methane is oxidized to CO2 and H2O at a low temperature. It is a promising solution to the removal of low-concentration methane from gas mixtures due to lower emissions of NO x , CO, and unburned hydrocarbons [13, 14]. Supported Pd catalysts have been found to have excellent catalytic activity for the process, and the supports generally are oxides, such as SiO2, Al2O3, silica-alumina, and different zeolithic frameworks [13, 14]. However, the catalytic combustion of methane is a strongly exothermic reaction, which requires that the supports can disperse the reaction heat efficiently. Unfortunately, the supports mentioned earlier are thermal insulators and the reaction heat accumulated on isolated metal nanoparticles makes them sintered together easily. Therefore, the reactions between the Pd nanoparticles and the supports remain a problem [11, 12]. To solve this problem, thermal conductive SiC and Si3N4 have been employed as the catalyst supports [15, 16]. Yet, Pd nanoparticles migrate and coalesce easily on SiC or Si3N4 surfaces, resulting in a decrease in catalytic activity again.
In this work, we employed nanoditched SiC nanowires to design the catalyst for catalytic combustion of methane and demonstrated that the novel nanostructures can effectively hinder the migration and growth of Pd nanoparticles and has greatly improved their catalytic stability.
Periodically twinned SiC nanowires were prepared by the carbothermal reduction of a carbonaceous silica xerogel precursor from tetraethoxysilane and biphenyl . The nanowires were etched in the mixture of HF (38–40%) and HNO3 (65%) solutions with a volume ratio of 3:1 at 60 °C for 10 min and 85°C for 30 min, respectively. After etching, the nanowires were washed with deionized water and dried at 110°C. The impregnation method was used to prepare Pd/SiC catalyst. Firstly, 0.4 g of the etched or unetched SiC was added into 20 ml of Pd(NO3)2 2H2O aqueous solution (0.05 wt.%) under stirring for 12 h. Afterward, the mixture was dried at 110°C for 12 h and then calcined in air at 500°C for 4 h. By this method, the catalyst has a Pd loading of 1 wt.%.
The catalytic performance of the Pd/SiC catalysts were tested in a fixed-bed quartz reactor with an inner diameter of 8 mm at atmospheric pressure, and the mixture of O2 (20%)/CH4(1%)/N2(79%) was used as the feedstock. A weight of 300 mg of the catalyst was packed between two layers of quartz wool. The hourly space velocity was controlled to be 12,000 h−1. Since the deactivation of a supported SiC catalyst usually demands a long time, a cyclic reaction method was used to estimate the catalyst stability. In this method, the catalyst was programmed heated to a temperature at which the reaction obtained a near 100% methane conversion. In the heating process, the methane conversion was measured at different temperature. Afterward, the reactor was cooled down to the temperature at which the catalyst just became inactive, and then the next reaction cycle began again.
The fresh and used catalysts were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2010). The sample was firstly ultrasonically dispersed in ethanol for 20 min. Afterward, a droplet of the suspension was dropped to a lacey carbon-coated copper grid and dried for TEM observation.
Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows TEM images of the as-prepared Pd/SiC catalyst (etched at 60°C for 10 min). In Fig. 1a, it can be seen that homogeneous Pd nanoparticles are dispersed on the nanowire surface. Moreover, almost all the Pd nanoparticles are partially embedded in the nanoditches, and the nanoditches have a negative curvature of about 10 nm (Fig. 1b). The Pd nanoparticles have a diameter ranging from 2.4 to 3.6 nm and an average size of 2.9 nm according to our statistical analysis. High-resolution TEM image (Fig. 1c) reveals the highly crystalline features of the support as well as the Pd particles. The spacing between two adjacent lattice fringes in the support is 0.254 nm, which corresponds well to the interplanar spacing of the (111) plane of β-SiC. The partially embedded nanoparticle gives the fringes of a lattice spacing of 0.224 nm, which is indexed as that of the (111) planes of face-centered cubic Pd.
where μ∞ is the chemical potential of a flat surface, γ is the surface energy of SiC per unit area, and Ω is the molecular volume of SiC, and kT has the usual meaning of thermal energy. Actually the nanoditches have the morphology of a pulley, so there are two curvatures and the other one is positive and its diameter is slightly less than that of the diameter of the nanowires before etching. We have ignored it in the previous equation. Due to the higher Gibbs–Thomson potential, the interaction between a Pd particle and the nanoditched support is higher than that of an unetched SiC support. Therefore, the nanoditches can not only enhance the interaction between the metal component and the support, but also avoid the reaction between them.
The catalyst test results in Fig. 3 show that with the unetched SiC, the temperature for complete conversion of methane is 410°C, which is slightly higher than that of the etched catalyst. The lower activity of the unetched catalyst is also due to the larger size of active Pd particles. More importantly, however, the activity of the unetched catalyst decreases rapidly. The methane conversion at 410°C decreases from the initial 100 to 82% after 10 cyclic reactions (see Fig. 3b). The TEM result shows that the size of Pd particles has an obvious increase. The average size of Pd particles has increased to 17.4 nm, and some of them even increased to 42 nm after 10 cycles (see Fig. 3c). These results indicate that the migration and the coalescence of the Pd particles have occurred seriously on the smooth surface of the unetched support.
The catalyst test results show that the 100% conversion temperature of methane on the 85°C etched catalyst is 430°C and the methane conversion decreases to 93% after 10 reaction cycles (Fig. 4b). It is worthwhile noting that the catalytic activity is lower than the unetched catalyst, but the stability is better. Figure 4c is a TEM image of the catalyst after 10 reaction cycles. From the image, the Pd particles have a size distribution from 12 to 16 nm and an average size of 14.7 nm, indicating that the particle size only has a slightly increase during the reaction cycles. These results demonstrate that the fin-like structures still can limit the growth of the Pd particles during the catalytic reaction and therefore improve the catalyst stability.
From the previous results, it can be found that the catalytic activity of Pd/SiC catalysts depends on the size of Pd nanoparticles. The smaller the particle size, the higher the catalytic activity. The Pd particles supported on the 60°C etched nanowires have an average diameter of 2.9 nm, and the corresponding catalyst can completely convert methane at 390°C (T100%). On the 85°C etched nanowires, the average particle size increases to 12.9 nm. Correspondingly, its T100% increases to 430°C. The unetched catalyst has an average Pd particle size of 6.7 nm and a T100% of 410°C; however, the Pd particles easily become large and thus result in the increase of T100%. Therefore, the etched nanostructures provide an effective route to control the size of metal particles and to restrict the growth of nanosized catalyst particles.
According to previous literature,α-SiC and β-SiC have different resistances to acid etching . Krasotkina et al. reported that α-SiC is stable in the boiling mixture of HF, HNO3, and H2SO4 acids, whereas β-SiC could be easily etched by the mixture . Lutsenko et al. also found that β-SiC could be completely dissolved in the mixture of HF and HNO3, whereas industrial SiC powder consisting of both α-SiC and β-SiC could be etched only partially . Many researchers have demonstrated that SiC materials are potentially excellent catalyst support for various reactions , such as dehydrogenation of n-butane , selective oxidation of H2S , catalytic reforming of hydrocarbons , ammonia synthesis , partial oxidation of methane [32, 33], and others [34–36]. However, these applications are greatly limited by the weak interaction between metal nanoparticles and SiC support. In other words, the metal particles migrate and grow easily on the inert SiC surface, and therefore decreasing the catalyst stability. Since industrial powder-like SiC materials usually contain numerous stacking faults in their crystallites, they can be etched selectively to produce a ditched morphology and larger specific surface area, which will make SiC more suitable to be the material for catalyst support. Therefore, the present work demonstrates that the etching method can be employed to design novel nanostructured catalyst with high activity and excellent stability. It enables a wide application of SiC materials as catalyst supports.
In heterogeneous catalysis and fuel cell fields, the size control and stabilization of metal nanoparticles is still a challenging problem. In this work, we firstly produced different-size nanoditches on the SiC nanowire surface by adjusting etching conditions, and then assembled Pd nanoparticles into the nanoditches to obtain a nanostructured Pd/SiC catalyst. The present results indicate that the metal particle size can be controlled and stabilized by the nanoditches. The nanostructured catalyst exhibits excellent stability in the catalytic combustion of methane, which is a strongly exothermic reaction. The catalyst can keep the methane conversion of almost 100% whereas the unetched one has an obvious decline in the catalytic activity from 100 to 82% after ten cycles. The excellent catalytic stability originates from the limitation of the nanoditches to the migration and growth of Pd nanoparticles.
The work was financially supported by NSFC (Ref: 20973190), Taiyuan City (Ref: 08121011), Shanxi Province (Ref: 2008011014-1), and an in-house research project of SKLCC from MOST (Ref: SKLCC-2008BWZ010).
- Ferreira PJ, la O’ GJ, Shao-Horn Y, Morgan D, Makharia R, Kocha S, Gasteiger HA: J. Electrochem. Soc.. 2005, 152: A2256. 10.1149/1.2050347View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peng ZM, Yang H: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2009, 131: 7542. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXlvVWlt7s%3D] 10.1021/ja902256aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Valden M, Lai X, Goodman DW: Science. 1998, 281: 1647. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXmtVSqu7w%3D]; Bibcode number [1998Sci...281.1647V] 10.1126/science.281.5383.1647View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turner M, Golovko VB, Vaughan OPH, Abdulkin P, Berenguer-Murcia A, Tikhov MS, Johnson BFG, Lambert RM: Nature. 2008, 454: 981. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVWns7zO]; Bibcode number [2008Natur.454..981T] 10.1038/nature07194View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Euzen P, Le Gal JH, Rebours B, Martin G: Catal. Today. 1999, 47: 19. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXnvVSlsbc%3D] 10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00280-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stasinska B, Machocki A, Antoniak K, Rotko M, Figueiredo JL, Gonçalves F: Catal. Today. 2008, 137: 329. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXptlygtbo%3D] 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.05.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo JJ, Lou H, Zheng XM: Carbon. 2007, 45: 1314. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXksl2itb8%3D] 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.01.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Joo SH, Park JY, Tsung CK, Yamada Y, Yang PD, Somorjai GA: Nat. Mater.. 2009, 8: 126. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXps1ejtw%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [2009NatMa...8..126J] 10.1038/nmat2329View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grass ME, Joo SH, Zhang YW, Somorjai GA: J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009, 113: 8616. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXltFSrt7g%3D] 10.1021/jp901288mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lim B, Jiang MJ, Camargo PHC, Cho EC, Tao J, Lu XM, Zhu YM, Xia YN: Science. 2009, 324: 1302. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXms12gtbs%3D]; Bibcode number [2009Sci...324.1302L] 10.1126/science.1170377View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Otto K, Haack LP, de Vries JE: Appl. Catal. B. 1992, 1: 1. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK38XitVSitrg%3D] 10.1016/0926-3373(92)80003-IView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Otto K, Hubbard CP, Weber WH, Graham GW: Appl. Catal. B. 1992, 1: 317. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXmslKmtw%3D%3D] 10.1016/0926-3373(92)80056-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ciuparu D, Lyubovsky MR, Altman E, Pfefferle LD, Datye A: Catal. Rev.. 2002, 44: 593. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXks1yr] 10.1081/CR-120015482View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Glin P, Primet M: Appl. Catal. B. 2002, 39: 1. 10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00076-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Méthivier C, Béguin B, Brun M, Massardier J, Bertolini JC: J. Catal.. 1998, 173: 374. 10.1006/jcat.1997.1924View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Méthivier C, Massardier J, Bertolini JC: Appl. Catal. A. 1999, 182: 337. 10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00026-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bechstedt F, Käckell P: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1995, 75: 2180. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXotVSrtrg%3D]; Bibcode number [1995PhRvL..75.2180B] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2180View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hao YJ, Wagner JB, Su DS, Jin GQ, Guo XY: Nanotechnology. 2006, 17: 2870. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xot1alsbw%3D]; Bibcode number [2006Nanot..17.2870H] 10.1088/0957-4484/17/12/008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang DH, Xu D, Wang Q, Hao YJ, Jin GQ, Guo XY, Tu KN: Nanotechnology. 2008, 19: 215602. Bibcode number [2008Nanot..19u5602W] Bibcode number [2008Nanot..19u5602W] 10.1088/0957-4484/19/21/215602View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Han XD, Zheng SL, Zhang YF, Zheng K, Zhang SB, Zhang Z, Zhang XN, Liu XQ, Chen G, Hao YJ, Guo XY: Nano Lett.. 2008, 8: 2258. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXotlOlsL8%3D]; Bibcode number [2008NanoL...8.2258H] 10.1021/nl080880wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shor JS, Kurtz AD, Grimberg I, Weiss BZ, Osgood RM: J. Appl. Phys.. 1997, 81: 1546. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXptFWgtA%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1997JAP....81.1546S] 10.1063/1.363890View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cambaz GZ, Yushin GN, Gogotsi Y, Lutsenko VG: Nano Lett.. 2006, 6: 548. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVylsbzJ]; Bibcode number [2006NanoL...6..548C] 10.1021/nl051858vView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lutsenko VG: Acta Mater.. 2008, 56: 2450. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXmsFais7s%3D] 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.033View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tu KN, Gsele U: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2005, 86: 093111. Bibcode number [2005ApPhL..86i3111T] Bibcode number [2005ApPhL..86i3111T] 10.1063/1.1873044View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krasotkina NI, Yakovleva VC, Voronin NI, Shmitt-Fogelevich SP: Ogneupory (in Russian). 1968, 11: 49.Google Scholar
- Lutsenko VG: Powder Metall. Met. Ceram.. 1993, 32: 199. 10.1007/BF00559748View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moene R, Tijsen EPAM, Makkee M, Moulijn JA: Appl. Catal. A. 1999, 184: 127. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjsFKntbY%3D] 10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00098-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harlin ME, Krause AOI, Heinrich B, Pham-Huu C, Ledoux MJ: Appl. Catal. A. 1999, 185: 311. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXktlKjsr4%3D] 10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00190-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keller N, Pham-Huu C, Ledoux MJ: Appl. Catal. A. 2001, 217: 205. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXkvF2itLk%3D] 10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00601-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sung IK, Christian IK, Mitchell M, Kim DP, Kenis PJA: Adv. Funct. Mater.. 2005, 15: 1336. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXoslGms7Y%3D] 10.1002/adfm.200500038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Y, Zheng Y, Li ZH, Yu HY, Wang R, Wei KM: J. Mol. Catal. A. 2009, 301: 79. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXisVOhsb0%3D] 10.1016/j.molcata.2008.11.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leroi P, Madani E, Pham-Huu C, Ledoux MJ, Savin-Poncet S, Bousquet JL: Catal. Today. 2004, 91: 53. 10.1016/j.cattod.2004.03.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun WZ, Jin GQ, Guo XY: Catal. Commun.. 2005, 6: 135. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXksVWktg%3D%3D] 10.1016/j.catcom.2004.11.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ivanova S, Vanhaecke E, Louis B, Libs S, Ledoux MJ, Rigolet S, Marichal C, Pham C, Luck F, Pham-Huu C: ChemSusChem. 2008, 1: 851. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlOgtrrM] 10.1002/cssc.200800024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen DL, Leroi P, Ledoux MJ, Pham-Huu C: Catal. Today. 2009, 141: 393. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXisFajt7s%3D] 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.10.019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ivanova S, Vanhaecke E, Dreibine L, Louis B, Phamb C, Pham-Huu C: Appl. Catal. A. 2009, 359: 151. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXksVCks7k%3D] 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.02.024View ArticleGoogle Scholar