Skip to main content

Synthesis and Magnetic Properties of Nearly Monodisperse CoFe2O4Nanoparticles Through a Simple Hydrothermal Condition

An Erratum to this article was published on 06 October 2010


Nearly monodisperse cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles without any size-selection process have been prepared through an alluring method in an oleylamine/ethanol/water system. Well-defined nanospheres with an average size of 5.5 nm have been synthesized using metal chloride as the law materials and oleic amine as the capping agent, through a general liquid–solid-solution (LSS) process. Magnetic measurement indicates that the particles exhibit a very high coercivity at 10 K and perform superparamagnetism at room temperature which is further illuminated by ZFC/FC curves. These superparamagnetic cobalt ferrite nanomaterials are considered to have potential application in the fields of biomedicine. The synthesis method is possible to be a general approach for the preparation of other pure binary and ternary compounds.


CoFe2O4, as a type of magnetic materials, has long been of intensive importance in the fundamental sciences and technological applications in various fields of electronics [1], photomagnetism [2], catalysis [3], ferrofluids [4], hyperthermia [5], cancer therapy [6], and molecular imaging agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [7]. The applications of CoFe2O4 are strongly influenced by its magnetic properties. For biomedical applications, CoFe2O4 nanoparticles are required to have a narrow size distribution, high magnetization values, a uniform spherical shape, and superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature. So far, various synthetic routes have been explored for the preparation of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles, such as hydrothermal [8], coprecipitation [9, 10], microemulsion [11], forced hydrolysis [12], reduction–oxidation route [13]. However, the main difficulty of these traditional methods is that the as-prepared nanoparticles are severely agglomerated with poor control of size and shape in most cases, which greatly restrict their applications [14]. In order to solve the above problems, thermal decomposition of organometallic precursors in high-boiling organic solution has been explored [15, 16] for the preparation of size- and shape-controlled monodisperse CoFe2O4 nanoparticles [14, 1719]. However, the major disadvantages of this method are the need of toxic and expensive reagents, high reaction temperature, and complex operations. To address these concerns, Li et al. adopted a general liquid–solid-solution (LSS) phase transfer and separation method [20]. This strategy is based on a general phase transfer mechanism occurring at the interfaces of the liquid, solid, and solution phases present during the synthesis. Through this general method, Li et al. successfully synthesized Fe3O4 doped with Co, which has a coercivity about 250 Oe at room temperature [21]. However, the synthesis of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles with a superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature has not been reported. In this letter, we report a significant improvement of the method of Li et al. [20] to synthesize nearly monodispersed CoFe2O4 nanoparticles and systematically investigate the magnetic properties of the as-prepared nanomaterials. At room temperature, these as-prepared nanoparticles were found to have high saturation magnetization values of 50 emu/g and superparamagnetic behavior with negligible coercivity, which is expected to have potential application in biomedicine.


Synthesis of CoFe2O4Spherical Nanoparticles

The process for synthesizing nearly monodisperse CoFe2O4 with superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature was carried out as follows: In a typical synthesis, 1.6 g (6 mmol) of FeCl3·6H2O and 0.7 g of (3 mmol) CoCl2·6H2O were dissolved in the solvent composed of 80 ml of water and 40 ml of ethanol. After that, 7.3 g (24 mmol) of sodium oleate and 7 ml of oleic amine were added into the above solution with strongly stirring at room temperature for 2 h. Then, the reaction precursor was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless autoclave with a capacity of 150 ml. In order to crystallize the particles, the reaction temperature of the autoclave was increased and maintained at 180°C for 12 h. Then, the system was cooled down to room temperature naturally. The products were separated from the final reaction solution by the addition of hexane. The red supernatant liquor containing CoFe2O4 nanoparticles was separated by a separating funnel. The as-prepared cobalt ferrite could be deposited by adding ethanol and obtained by centrifugating at a high speed (10,000 rpm) without any size-selecting process. The as-prepared samples could be well redispersed in a hexane solvent and stored for several months without delamination.


Properties of the as-synthesized samples were charactered through several techniques. The phase contents and crystal structures of the samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation on a Philips X’pert diffractometer. Elemental analysis for metal iron was measured by an IRIS ER/S inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer (ICP-ES). High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) analysis was carried out on a JEM-2010 transmission electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. One droplet of hexane dispersion of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles was dropped on a carbon-coated copper grid and then dried naturally before recording the micrographs. FTIR spectra of the samples capped with oleic amine were performed on a 170SX spectrometer in the range of 500–4,000 cm−1. Magnetic properties of the products were characterized at room temperature with a Lake Shore 7,304 vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Temperature and field dependences of the samples were recorded on a Quantum Design MPMS-XL superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). ZFC/FC measurements were carried out in the temperature range of 10–330 K with an applied field of 100 Oe.

Results and Discussion

The X-ray pattern of the as-synthesized samples is depicted in Fig. 1. The positions and relative intensities of all the peaks indicate that the crystalline structure of the products favors the formation of cubic spinel phase only, which is accordant to JCPDS card NO. 22-1086. No other impurity phases are observed. Additionally, it clearly shows that the as-synthesized CoFe2O4 samples reveal broadening diffraction peak, which is due to the reduced particle size. The average grain size of the as-synthesized nanoparticles calculated by Scherer’s formula [10] is 6 nm. Based of the highest intensity peak of (311), the calculated lattice parameter is 0.8456 nm, which is larger than the bulk CoFe2O4 value of 0.8391 nm. The enhancement of the calculated lattice parameter probably results from different distribution of metal cations compared with the bulk spinel cobalt ferrite and the surface distortion of particles induced by the size effect of nanoparticles [13].

Figure 1
figure 1

XRD pattern of the as-synthesized CoFe2O4 nanoparticles

The chemical composition of the as-synthesized products is further analyzed by the inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). The result reveals that the molar ratio of Co and Fe is 1:2.05, which is nearly consistent with the expected stoichiometry of CoFe2O4.

Figure 2 shows TEM images of the CoFe2O4 nanoparticles obtained without any size-sorting process. It reveals that the as-synthesized nanoparticles were nearly monodisperse with spherical shape. The particle size with a narrow distribution is given in the inset of Fig. 2a. The average particles size is 5.5 nm, which is in good agreement with the particle sizes estimated by Scherer’s formula. This suggests that each individual particle is a single crystal [19]. Figure 2b performs the high-resolution (HR) TEM characterizations of the particles, and the highly crystalline nature of the samples is revealed in the inset of Fig. 2b.

Figure 2
figure 2

TEM image of the as-synthesized CoFe2O4 nanoparticles

FTIR spectra of the samples capped with oleic amine were performed in the range of 500–4,000 cm−1(Fig. 3). The wide peak around 3,374 cm−1 is ascribed to the complexation between -NH2 and -OH on the surface of CoFe2O4. The peak at 3,007 cm−1 is assigned to the stretching of the vinyl group. The peaks at 2,921 and 2,850 cm−1 are attributed to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching of the CH2 groups, respectively. The sharp peaks are due to the long hydrocarbon chain of oleic amine. The peaks at 1,409 and 1,307 cm−1 correspond to C–H bending of CH2 group. The peak at 965 cm−1 is attributed to the O–H outplane vibration. The peak at 593 cm−1 is owing to the presence of ferrite nanoparticles. The FTIR spectrum confirms that the as-synthesized nanoparticles are coated by oleic amine, which can provide repulsive (electrostatic repulsion and steric repulsion) forces to balance the attractive forces (dipole–dipole interaction, exchange interaction, and van der Waals force.) between the nanoparticles. Thus, on account of the repulsion, the as-prepared CoFe2O4 samples are easily dispersed in the nonpolar solvents and stabilized in the suspension without agglomeration.

Figure 3
figure 3

FTIR spectra of the as-synthesized CoFe2O4 nanoparticles

The field dependence of the magnetization of as-synthesized particles measured at 300 and 10 K is shown in Fig. 4. Magnetic measurements indicate that the as-prepared particles exhibit superparamagnetic behavior with negligible coercivity (about 11 Oe) and remanence at room temperature.

Figure 4
figure 4

Hysteresis loop of the as-synthesized CoFe2O4 nanoparticles measured at a 300 K, b 10 K

The saturation magnetization value is 50 emu/g at room temperature, which is less than the bulk value of 74 emu/g [10]. For nanoscaled nanoparticles, the loss of the saturation magnetization is due to surface spin canting effect [22] and the presence of a magnetic dead or antiferromagnetic layer on the surface [13, 23], which is caused by finite-size effect of the small magnetic nanoparticles. Additionally, the magnetic performance of the ferrite-structured nanomaterials is also influenced by the distribution of metal cations, which is different from the bulk ferrite. A summary of the magnetic properties between the as-synthesized products and the reported CoFe2O4 is given in Table 1. In our best knowledge, CoFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared in this work have a higher saturation magnetization value compared with the reported samples with superparamagnetic behaviors in the applied field of 12,000 Oe at room temperature. The saturation magnetization value (73.8 emu/g) measured at 10 K is close to the value of bulk CoFe2O4 (74 emu/g).

Table 1 Comparison of magnetic properties of the as-synthesized cobalt ferrites and the reported CoFe2O4 measured at room temperature

The particles exhibit superparamagnetic behavior with negligible coercivity (about 11 Oe) at room temperature, which is much lower compared with the value (250 Oe) reported by Li et al. [21]. The magnetic properties of samples are greatly related to many factors, such as shape, size, and structure, which are influenced by the synthetic method and experimental parameters. This greatly reduced coercivity is understood as follows: The as-synthesized CoFe2O4 nanoparticles are spherical in shape, well-isolated, and the particle size of the product is found in the range of the critical size of CoFe2O4 for superparamagnetic limit reported in literature [24], which is about 4–9 nm. Additionally, the decrease of coercivity in our samples illuminates that the coercivity has a particle-size-dependent character [29]. Whereas, the coercivity of the samples as-synthesized reaches 14.55 kOe, much larger than the value of bulk CoFe2O4 (about 5 kOe at 5 K). The comparisons of the magnetic properties measured at 300 and 10 K for our samples are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 The magnetic properties of the as-synthesized CoFe2O4 measured at different temperature

Figure 5 shows the zero-field-cooled and field-cooled (ZFC/FC) curves of the as-prepared CoFe2O4 samples measured at temperatures between 10 and 330 K with an applied field of 100 Oe. As the temperature rises from 10 to 330 K, the ZFC magnetization increases first and then decreases after reaching a maximum at 240 K, which is correspond to the blocking temperature (TB). This result further proves that the CoFe2O4 samples as-prepared display a superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature. Whereas the FC magnetization decreased endlessly as the temperature increased. It is imagined that the difference between ZFC magnetization and FC magnetization below TB is caused by energy barriers of the magnetic anisotropy [30]. The magnetic anisotropy constant K of the samples as-prepared can be calculated by the followed formula [30, 31]:


where kB is the Boltzman constant, TB is the blocking temperature of the samples, and V is the volume of a single particle. The calculated magnetic anisotropy constant K of our samples is 3.8 × 106 ergs/cm3, which is slightly larger than that of the K values of bulk CoFe2O4 [(1.8–3.0) × 106 ergs/cm3].

Figure 5
figure 5

Zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) curves for the as-synthesized CoFe2O4 nanoparticles under an applied magnetic field of 100 Oe

The distribution function of the magnetic anisotropy energy barriers f(T) can be obtained through the following equation [13, 30]:


where MFC (FC magnetization) involves the total magnetization from the contribution of all particles, MZFC (ZFC magnetization) is determined by the magnetization from only the contribution of the nanoparticles whose energy barriers are overcomed by the thermal energy (kBT) at the measuring temperature, and f(T) reflects a quantitative characterization for superparamagnetism of the magnetic nanoparticles.

Figure 6 reveals the calculated anisotropy energy distribution for the as-synthesized CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. Generally, the volume and shape distribution of the samples determine the magnetic anisotropy energy distribution. Therefore, the result implies that the thermal energies of most particles have exceeded the energy barriers beyond TB(about 240 K). So the as-synthesized samples display superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature. In addition, the narrow magnetic anisotropy energy distribution reveals that the as-prepared CoFe2O4 nanoparticles possess uniform sizes [13, 30]. The superparamagnetic behavior and narrow size distribution imply that the sample prepared in this work is a good candidate for the possible biomedical applications.

Figure 6
figure 6

Energy barrier distributions of magnetic anisotropy for the as-synthesized CoFe2O4 nanoparticles


In conclusion, nearly monodispersed CoFe2O4 nanoparticles were prepared under a simple hydrothermal condition. The as-synthesized samples are considered to have potential applications in biomedicine for its narrow particle size distribution, high saturation magnetizations, and superparamagnetization at room temperature. The simple synthesis route used in this work is expected to be a general approach for the preparation of binary and ternary metal oxide, especially spinel ferrite.


An erratum to this article can be found at


  1. Sugimoto M: J. Am. Ceram. Soc.. 1999, 82: 269. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXht1Sisr0%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXht1Sisr0%3D] 10.1111/j.1551-2916.1999.tb20058.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Giri AK, Kirkpatrick EM, Moongkhamklang P, Majetich SA: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2002, 80: 2341. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XisVersrs%3D]; Bibcode number [2002ApPhL..80.2341G] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XisVersrs%3D]; Bibcode number [2002ApPhL..80.2341G] 10.1063/1.1464661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mathew T, Shylesh S, Devassy BM, Vijayaraj M, Satyanarayana CVV, Rao BS, Gopinath CS: Appl.Catal. A-Gen.. 2004, 273: 35. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmvFShsrc%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmvFShsrc%3D] 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacintho GVM, Brolo AG, Corio P, Suarez PAZ, Rubim JC: J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009, 113: 7684. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXktlygsLk%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXktlygsLk%3D] 10.1021/jp9013477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pradhan P, Giri J, Samanta G, Sarma HD, Mishra KP, Bellare J, Banerjee R, Bahadur D: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater.. 2007, 81B: 12. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsFCitbw%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsFCitbw%3D] 10.1002/jbm.b.30630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sincai M, Gângǎ D, Bica D, Vékás L: J. Magn. Magn. Mater.. 2001, 225: 235. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXislahsrk%3D]; Bibcode number [2001JMMM..225..235S] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXislahsrk%3D]; Bibcode number [2001JMMM..225..235S] 10.1016/S0304-8853(00)01263-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, Huh YM, Jun YW, Seo JW, Jang JT, Song HT, Kim S, Cho EJ, Yoon HG, Suh JS, Cheon J: Nat. Med.. 2007, 13: 95. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhvFWjtw%3D%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhvFWjtw%3D%3D] 10.1038/nm1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baruwati B, Nadagouda MN, Varma RS: J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008, 112: 18399. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlWqurbK] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlWqurbK]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao SY, Lee DK, Kim CW, Cha HG, Kim YH, Kang YS: Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.. 2006, 27: 237. 10.5012/bkcs.2006.27.2.237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zi ZF, Sun YP, Zhu XB, Yang ZR, Dai JM, Song WH: J. Magn. Magn. Mater.. 2009, 321: 1251. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjtFels7s%3D]; Bibcode number [2009JMMM..321.1251Z] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjtFels7s%3D]; Bibcode number [2009JMMM..321.1251Z] 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee Y, Lee J, Bae CJ, Park JG, Noh HJ, Park JH, Hyeon T: Adv. Funct. Mater.. 2005, 15: 503. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXivVamurY%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXivVamurY%3D] 10.1002/adfm.200400187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanh N, Quy OK, Thuy NP, Tung LD, Spinu L: Physica B. 2003, 327: 382. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhs1eisLo%3D]; Bibcode number [2003PhyB..327..382H] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhs1eisLo%3D]; Bibcode number [2003PhyB..327..382H] 10.1016/S0921-4526(02)01750-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gu ZJ, Xiang X, Fan GL, Li F: J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008, 112: 18459. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlWqtLzK] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlWqtLzK]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhattacharyya S, Salvetat JP, Fleurier R, Husmann A, Cacciaguerra T, Saboungi ML: Chem. Commun.. 2005, 38: 4818. 10.1039/b509026a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu AH, Salabas EL, Schüth F: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. 2007, 46: 1222. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXitF2lurs%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXitF2lurs%3D] 10.1002/anie.200602866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Park J, Joo J, Kwon SG, Jang YJ, Hyeon T: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. 2007, 46: 4630. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnsVWitrg%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnsVWitrg%3D] 10.1002/anie.200603148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Song Q, Zhang ZJ: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2004, 126: 6164. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjsVSlsb4%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjsVSlsb4%3D] 10.1021/ja049931r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bao NZ, Shen LM, An W, Padhan P, Turner CH, Gupta A: Chem. Mater.. 2009, 21: 3458. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXntFCmu7c%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXntFCmu7c%3D] 10.1021/cm901033m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun SH, Zeng H, Robinson DB, Raoux S, Rice PM, Wang SX, Li GX: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2004, 126: 273. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1yms7o%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1yms7o%3D] 10.1021/ja0380852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang X, Zhang J, Peng Q, Li YD: Nature. 2005, 437: 121. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXpslalsLk%3D]; Bibcode number [2005Natur.437..121W] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXpslalsLk%3D]; Bibcode number [2005Natur.437..121W] 10.1038/nature03968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liang X, Wang X, Zhuang J, Chen YT, Wang DS, Li YD: Adv. Funct. Mater.. 2006, 16: 1805. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVKgur3J] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVKgur3J] 10.1002/adfm.200500884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pankhurst QA, Pollard RJ: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1991, 67: 248. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXkvVert7w%3D]; Bibcode number [1991PhRvL..67..248P] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXkvVert7w%3D]; Bibcode number [1991PhRvL..67..248P] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng M, Wu XC, Zou BS, Wang YJ: J. Magn. Magn. Mater.. 1998, 183: 152. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXhvFCktbc%3D]; Bibcode number [1998JMMM..183..152Z] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXhvFCktbc%3D]; Bibcode number [1998JMMM..183..152Z] 10.1016/S0304-8853(97)01057-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim YI, Kim D, Lee CS: Physica B. 2003, 337: 42. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmvVGjurk%3D]; Bibcode number [2003PhyB..337...42K] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmvVGjurk%3D]; Bibcode number [2003PhyB..337...42K] 10.1016/S0921-4526(03)00322-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bao NZ, Shen LM, Wang YHA, Ma JX, Mazumdar D, Gupta A: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2009, 131: 12900. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVWntbbM] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVWntbbM] 10.1021/ja905811h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu CQ, Gao ZH, Yang XR: J. Magn. Magn. Mater.. 2008, 320: L70. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXis1Wit7Y%3D]; Bibcode number [2008JMMM..320L..70H] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXis1Wit7Y%3D]; Bibcode number [2008JMMM..320L..70H] 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pant RP, Kumar V, Halder SK, Gupta SK, Singh S: Int. J. Nanoscience.. 2007, 6: 515. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht12hsLo%3D]; Bibcode number [2007IJN....06..515P] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht12hsLo%3D]; Bibcode number [2007IJN....06..515P] 10.1142/S0219581X07004997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajendran M, Pullar RC, Bhattacharya AK, Das D, Chintalapudi SN, Maijumdar CK: J. Magn. Magn. Mater.. 2001, 232: 71. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXksVWjs74%3D]; Bibcode number [2001JMMM..232...71R] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXksVWjs74%3D]; Bibcode number [2001JMMM..232...71R] 10.1016/S0304-8853(01)00151-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pelecky DLL, Rieke RD: Chem. Mater.. 1996, 8: 1770. 10.1021/cm960077f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hyeon T, Chung Y, Park J, Lee SS, Kim YW, Park BH: J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002, 106: 6831. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XksFyit74%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XksFyit74%3D] 10.1021/jp026042m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Park J, Lee E, Hwang NM, Kang M, Kim SC, Hwang Y, Park JG, Noh HJ, Kim JY, Park JH, Hyeon T: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. 2005, 44: 2872. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXksVKls7Y%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXksVKls7Y%3D] 10.1002/anie.200461665

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 50602020.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tao Wang or Fa-Shen Li.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, XH., Xu, CL., Han, XH. et al. Synthesis and Magnetic Properties of Nearly Monodisperse CoFe2O4Nanoparticles Through a Simple Hydrothermal Condition. Nanoscale Res Lett 5, 1039 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Monodisperse
  • Cobalt ferrite
  • Superparamagnetic
  • Nanoparticles
  • Magnetic
  • Biomedcine