Dielectric Relaxation of La-Doped Zirconia Caused by Annealing Ambient
© Zhao et al. 2010
Received: 13 April 2010
Accepted: 9 September 2010
Published: 30 September 2010
La-doped zirconia films, deposited by ALD at 300°C, were found to be amorphous with dielectric constants (k-values) up to 19. A tetragonal or cubic phase was induced by post-deposition annealing (PDA) at 900°C in both nitrogen and air. Higher k-values (~32) were measured following PDA in air, but not after PDA in nitrogen. However, a significant dielectric relaxation was observed in the air-annealed film, and this is attributed to the formation of nano-crystallites. The relaxation behavior was modeled using the Curie–von Schweidler (CS) and Havriliak–Negami (HN) relationships. The k-value of the as-deposited films clearly shows a mixed CS and HN dependence on frequency. The CS dependence vanished after annealing in air, while the HN dependence disappeared after annealing in nitrogen.
KeywordsLa ZrO2 La0.35Zr0.65O2
Amorphous ZrO2 is one of the most promising dielectrics (dielectric constant k-value ~20) to replace SiO2 in MOSFETs at the 45-nm node CMOS technologies. Due to the aggressive down-scaling of MOSFET, higher dielectric constant materials and higher mobility semiconductors other than silicon are introduced [1–11]. Germanium is considered to be a good candidate to replace silicon in the channel of next-generation high-performance CMOS devices, while rare earth oxides belonging to another class of materials offer good passivation of germanium to reduce the density of interface states, as it has recently been suggested [5, 7, 10]. On the other hand, theoretical studies have reported that the metastable tetragonal and cubic phases (t- and c-phases) of ZrO2 have higher k-values [12, 13]. The addition of rare earth elements, such as La, Gd, Dy, or Er, is reported to stabilize these phases and k-values of up to 40 have been obtained [7–11, 14].
In order to induce the t- and c-phases in the La-doped ZrO2, dielectric post-deposition annealing (PDA) is needed, otherwise the layers grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD) at relatively low temperatures (<450°C) have an amorphous microstructure [15, 16]. However, the transformation from amorphous to t- and c-phases can cause both dielectric relaxation and an adverse increase in the leakage current [14, 17]. Leakage, which is the quantity defined in the ITRS Roadmap, depends on the combination of k-value and energy offset values between the energy bands of the high-k material and the silicon crystal. For example, 1 × 10-8 A/cm2 is a value required for DRAM capacitors  (much higher values are accepted for gate oxides in CMOS). Since the purpose to introduce high-k dielectrics is to reduce the leakage current of gate oxides, a lot of investigations on the leakage current of high-k dielectrics have been carried out [19–23].
However, there is little information about dielectric relaxation of La-doped ZrO2 dielectrics. Since loss due to the dielectric relaxation can cause MOSFET deterioration, the aim in this study was therefore to investigate the effect of PDA on the relaxation behavior of La-doped ZrO2. In this paper, we report the influence of the annealing ambient on the dielectric relaxation processes, which can be described by both the Havriliak–Negami (HN) and Curie–von Schweidler (CS) relationships [24–27] in the frequency range of 10 MHz.
La-doped ZrO2 films, with a thickness of 35 nm, were deposited on n-type Si(100) substrates by liquid injection ALD at 300°C, using a modified Aixtron AIX 200FE AVD reactor configured for liquid injection . Both Zr and La sources are Cp-based precursors ([(MeCp)2ZrMe(OMe)] and [(iPrCp)3La]) [15, 16]. The composition of the La-doped ZrO2 films was estimated to be La0.35Zr0.65O2 from Auger electron spectroscopy (AES). Selected films were annealed at 700°C or 900°C for 15 min, in an N2 or air ambient.
The effects of PDA on the physical and electrical properties of the La0.35Zr0.65O2 films have been investigated using cross-section transmission electron microscopy (XTEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), high–low frequency capacitance–voltage (C–V), capacitance–frequency (C–f), and current–voltage (I–V) measurements, respectively.
In order to perform the C–V, C–f and I–V measurements, metal (Au) gate electrodes were evaporated to form metal–oxide–semiconductor capacitors (Au/La0.35Zr0.65O2/IL/n-Si, where IL stands for interfacial layer) with an effective contact area of 4.9 × 10-4 cm2. The backside of the Si wafer was cleaned with a buffered HF solution, and subsequently a 200-nm-thick film of Al was deposited to form an ohmic back contact. A thermal SiO2 sample was grown using dry oxidation at 1100°C to provide a comparison with the high-k stacks. Its back-side contact was prepared in exactly the same way as for all other La0.35Zr0.65O2 samples: depositing Al after HF treatment.
Results and Discussion
From the early days of silicon technology, thermal oxidation of Si has been known to introduce fixed positive charge at the Si/SiO2 interface . Positive charge generation during high-temperature processing is not new to thin film SiO2 physics; its presence has been detected ever since the pioneering era of Si oxidation in the form of fixed oxide charge that often develops during the oxidation process . The presence of positively charged, over-coordinated oxygen centers in SiO2 has been suggested previously in the work of Snyder and Fowler . They showed that the positive charge involved with the E' oxygen-vacancy center is in fact associated with over-coordination of an O. Warren et al. suggested that the formation of positively charged over-coordinated O defects is near the Si/SiO2 interface [33, 34]. The effect of post-deposition oxidation of SiOx/ZrO2 gate dielectric stacks at different temperatures (500–700°C) on the density of fixed charge was proposed by Houssa et al. . They indicated that increasing oxidation temperature, the density of negative fixed charge is reduced. The net positive charge observed after oxidation at >500°C resembles the charge generated at the Si/SiO2 interface by hydrogen in the same temperatures range. They proposed that the observed oxidation-induced positive charge in the SiOx/ZrO2 gate stack may be related to over-coordinated oxygen centers induced by hydrogen. This also matches our previous observations at the Si/SiO2 and Si/SiO2/HfO2 structures [36, 37].
The effects of series resistances and parasitic effects were reported in our previous work . To minimize the effects of series resistances and back contact imperfections (including contact resistance R, contact capacitance C, or parasitic R–C coupled in series, etc.), aluminum back contacts were deposited over a large area of the substrate wafer that was cleaned with a buffered HF solution before aluminum contacts were formed. The same procedure was carried out for all as-deposited, N2-annealed, and air-annealed samples. All samples tested had the same or very similar substrate area (~ 2 × 2 cm2) to ensure that the effects of series resistance and back contact imperfections were the same for all samples. Furthermore, measurement cables and connections were kept short to further minimize parasitic capacitance effects and were the same for all samples. To provide a comparison with Figure 4a, a C–V measurement on a thermal SiO2 sample with the same HF treatment and Al deposition on its back was carried out from the same test system; the results are shown in Figure 4b. It is clear that no frequency dispersion was observed on the thermal SiO2 sample. Therefore, the effects of series resistances and parasitic effects are negligible.
Before k-value of the La0.35Zr0.65O2 dielectric is extracted from the strong accumulation capacitance at +3 V (<+1MV/cm), the effect of the presence of the lossy interlayer must be taken into account. The effect was also reported in our previous work .
Annealing at a high temperature is employed to induce the t- and c-phases in the La-doped ZrO2 dielectric from the amorphous samples [15, 16]. The addition of La is to stabilize these phases, and the stabilized tetragonal/cubic ZrO2 phase gives a higher k-value [7–14]. Annealing temperature was reported to range from 400 to 1,050°C, depending on the deposition conditions and substrates of high-k dielectrics that determine the microstructure of the as-deposited samples. It was reported that the germanium substrate requires lower annealing temperatures ranging from 400 to 600°C [7–11]. If the microstructure of the as-deposited LaZrO2 samples had already been tetragonal/cubic, annealing at high temperatures would not be necessary .
It has been shown previously that dielectric relaxation in the time domain can be described by a power-law time dependence, t-n[26, 27], or a stretched exponential time dependence, exp[-(t/t0) m ] [39, 40], where n and m are parameters ranging between 0 and 1, and t0 is a characteristic relaxation time.
where ε s and ε ∞ , are the static and high-frequency limit permittivities, respectively; τ is the HN relaxation time; ω = 2πf is the angular frequency; and n, α, and β are the relaxation parameters.
A theoretical description of the slow relaxation in complex condensed systems is still a topic of active research despite the great effort made in recent years. There exist two alternative approaches to the interpretation of dielectric relaxation: the parallel and series models . The parallel model represents the classical relaxation of a large assembly of individual relaxing entities such as dipoles, each of which relaxes with an exponential probability in time but has a different relaxation time t k . The total relaxation process corresponds to a summation over the available modes k, given a frequency domain response function, which can be approximated by the HN relationship.
The alternative approach is the series model, which can be used to describe briefly the origins of the CS law (the t-n behavior). Consider a system divided into two interacting sub-systems . The first of these responds rapidly to a stimulus generating a change in the interaction which, in turn, causes a much slower response of the second sub-system. The state of the total system then corresponds to the excited first system together with the unresponded second system and can be considered as a transient or metastable state, which slowly decays as the second system responds.
In some complex condensed systems, neither the pure parallel nor the pure series approach is accepted and instead interpolates smoothly between these extremes . The CS behavior has to be faster than the HN function at short times and slower than the HN function at long times.
Based on the discussion above, the dielectric relaxation results (shown in Figure 6) have been modeled with the CS and/or HN relationships (see solid lines in Figure 6). The relaxation of the as-deposited film obeyed a mixed CS and HN relationships. After the 900°C PDA, the relaxation behavior of the N2-annealed film was dominated by the CS law, whereas the air-annealed film was predominantly modeled by the HN relationship that was accompanied by a sharp drop in the k-value.
Although the exact microstructural cause of these relaxation processes is not clearly known, several mechanisms for the dielectric relaxation have been proposed, including distribution of relaxation time , distribution of hopping probabilities , space charge trapping , self-similar multi-well potential for ionic configurations , or double potential well occupied by one electron . However, it has been reported that a decrease in crystal grain size can cause an increase in the dielectric relaxation in ferroelectric relaxor ceramics [51, 52]. This relaxation effect has been attributed to higher stresses in the smaller grains . A similar effect appears to have occurred with these La-doped dielectric films, with the 900°C air anneal producing 4-nm diameter equiaxed nano-crystallites within the film, and suffering from a severe dielectric relaxation. The 900°C N2-annealed film contains much larger ~15-nm crystals and does not suffer from severe dielectric relaxation. Therefore, the physical processes behind the relaxation are probably related to the size of the crystal grains formed during annealing.
PDA at 900°C either in N2 or in air causes crystallization (t- or c-phases) of the La0.35Zr0.65O2 dielectric. Larger crystal grain sizes were observed in the N2-annealed sample than in the air-annealed sample. Following PDA in N2, the k-value was maintained and the dielectric relaxation was reduced. However, PDA in air causes a significant increase in k-value (32 at 1 kHz) and a significant dielectric relaxation, probably associated with smaller crystal grain sizes. The relaxation behavior of the as-deposited sample can be modeled using the mixed CS and HN relationships. PDA in N2 suppressed the HN law, while the CS law was removed following PDA in air.
This research was funded in part from the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council of UK under the grant EP/D068606/1, the National Natural and Science Foundation of China under the grant no. 60976075, and the Suzhou Science and Technology Bureau of China under the grant SYG201007.
- Boscke TS, Govindarajan S, Fachmann C, Heitmann J, Avellan A, Schroder U, Kirsch PD, Krug C, Hung PY, Song SC, Ju BS, Price J, Pant G, Gnade BE, Krautschneider W, Lee B-H, Jammy R: Tech Dig Int Electron Devices Meet. 2006, 255.Google Scholar
- Lu N, Li H-J, Peterson JJ, Kwong DL: Appl Phys Lett. 2007, 90: 082911. 10.1063/1.2396891View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Darmawan P, Lee PS, Setiawan Y, Ma J, Oscipowicz T: Appl Phys Lett. 2007, 91: 092903. 10.1063/1.2771065View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lopes JMJ, Littmark U, Roeckerath M, St Lenk , Schubert J, Mantl S, Besmehn A: J Appl Phys. 2007, 101: 104109. 10.1063/1.2735396View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mavrou G, Galata S, Tsipas P, Sotiropoulos A, Panayiotatos Y, Dimoulas A, Evangelou EK, Seo JW, Dieker Ch: J Appl Phys. 2008, 103: 014506. 10.1063/1.2827499View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abermann S, Bethge O, Henkel C, Bertagnolli E: Appl Phys Lett. 2009, 94: 262904. 10.1063/1.3173199View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abermann S, Henkel C, Bethge O, Pozzovivo G, Klang P, Bertagnolli E: Applied Surface Science. 2010, 256: 5031. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.049View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mavrou G, Tsipas P, Sotiropoulos A, Galata S, Panayiotatos Y, Dimoulas A, Marchiori C, Fompeyrine J: Appl Phys Lett. 2008, 93: 212904. 10.1063/1.3033546View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsoutsou D, Apostolopoulos G, Galata S, Tsipas P, Sotiropoulos A, Mavrou G, Panayiotatos Y, Dimoulas A: Microelectron Eng. 2009, 86: 1626. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.02.037View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsoutsou D, Lamagna L, Volkos SN, Molle A, Baldovino S, Schamm S, Coulon PE, Fanciulli M: Appl Phys Lett. 2009, 94: 053504. 10.1063/1.3075609View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lamagna L, Wiemer C, Baldovino S, Molle A, Perego M, Schamm-Chardon S, Coulon PE, Fanciulli M: Appl Phys Lett. 2009, 95: 122902. 10.1063/1.3227669View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vanderbilt D, Zhao X, Ceresoli D: Thin Solid Films. 2005, 486: 125. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.232View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao X, Vanderbilt D: Phys Rev B. 2002, 65: 233106. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.233106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Govindarajan S, Boscke TS, Sivasubramani P, Kirsch PD, Lee BH, Tseng H-H, Jammy R, Schroder U, Ramanathan S, Gnade BE: Appl Phys Lett. 2007, 91: 062906. 10.1063/1.2768002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gaskell JM, Jones AC, Aspinall HC, Taylor S, Taechakumput P, Chalker PR, Heys PN, Odedra R: Appl Phys Lett. 2007, 91: 112912. 10.1063/1.2784956View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gaskell JM, Jones AC, Chalker PR, Werner M, Aspinall HC, Taylor S, Taechakumput P, Heys PN: Chem Vap Deposition. 2007, 13: 684. 10.1002/cvde.200706637View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boscke TS, Govindarajan S, Kirsch PD, Hung PY, Krug C, Lee BH, Heitmann J, Schroder U, Pant G, Gnade BE, Krautschneider WH: Appl Phys Lett. 2007, 91: 072902. 10.1063/1.2771376View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mueller W, Aichmayr G, Bergner W, Erben E, Hecht T, Kapteyn C, Kersch A, Kudelka S, Lau F, Luetzen J, Orth A, Nuetzel J, Schloesser T, Scholz A, Schroeder U, Sieck A, Spitzer A, Strasser M, Wang PF, Wege S, Weis R: Tech Dig –Int Electron Devices Meet. 2005, 34.Google Scholar
- Fu Chung-Hao, Chang-Liao Kuei-Shu, Wang Tien-Ko, Tsai WF, Ai CF: Microelectronic Engineering. 2010, 87: 2014. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.12.082View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiong Yuhua, Tu Hailing, Du Jun, Ji Mei, Zhang Xinqiang, Wang Lei: Appl Phys Lett. 2010, 97: 012901. 10.1063/1.3460277View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Southwick RichardG, Reed Justin, Buu Christopher, Butler Ross, Bersuker Gennadi, Knowlton WilliamB: IEEE Tran Device and Materials Reliability. 2010, 10: 201. 10.1109/TDMR.2009.2039215View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim Joo-Hyung, Ignatova VelislavaA, Kücher Peter, Weisheit Martin, Zschech Ehrenfried: Current Applied Physics. 2009, 9: e104. 10.1016/j.cap.2008.12.040View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin Dominik, Grube Matthias, Weber WalterM, Rüstig Jürgen, Bierwagen Oliver, Geelhaar Lutz, Riechert Henning: Appl Phys Lett. 2009, 95: 142906. 10.1063/1.3243987View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jonscher AK: Dielectric Relaxation in Solids. Chelsea Dielectric Press, London; 1983.Google Scholar
- Havriliak S, Negami S: Polymer. 1967, 8: 161. 10.1016/0032-3861(67)90021-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Curie J: Ann Chim Phys. 1889, 18: 203.Google Scholar
- von Schweidler E: Ann Phys. 1907, 24: 711. 10.1002/andp.19073291407View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Potter RJ, Chalker PR, Manning TD, Aspinall HC, Loo YF, Jones AC, Smith LM, Critchlow GW, Schumacher M: Chem Vap Deposition. 2005, 11: 159. 10.1002/cvde.200406348View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe H, Ikarashi N, Ito F: Appl Phys Lett. 2003, 83: 3546. 10.1063/1.1622107View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng YC: Prog Surf Sci. 1977, 8: 181. and references therein and references therein 10.1016/0079-6816(77)90003-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deal BE, Sklar M, Grove AS, Snow EH: J Electrochem Soc. 1967, 114: 266. 10.1149/1.2426565View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Synder KC, Fowler WB: Phys Rev B. 1993, 48: 13238. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.13238View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Warren WL, Vanheusden K, Schwank JR, Fleetwood DM, Winokur PS, Devine RAB: Appl Phys Lett. 1996, 68: 2993. 10.1063/1.116674View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Warren WL, Vanheusden K, Fleetwood DM, Schwank JR, Shaneyfelt MR, Winokur PS, Devine RAB: IEEE Tran Nuclear Science. 1996, 43: 2617. 10.1109/23.556844View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Houssa M, Afanas'ev VV, Stesmans A, Heyns MM: Appl Phys Lett. 2000, 77: 1885. 10.1063/1.1310635View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JF, Zhao CZ, Groeseneken G, Degraeve R, Ellis JN, Beech CD: J Appl Phys. 2001, 90: 1911. 10.1063/1.1384860View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao CZ, Zhang JF, Chang MH, Peaker AR, Hall S, Groeseneken G, Pantisano L, De Gendt S, Heyns M: J Appl Phys. 2008, 103: 014507. 10.1063/1.2826937View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taechakumput P, Zhao CZ, Taylor S, Werner M, Chalker PR, Gaskell JM, Jones AC, Drobnis M: In "Origin of Frequency Dispersion in High-k Dielectrics", Semiconductor Technology Conference (ISTC2008), Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Semiconductor Technology. Edited by: Ming Yang. 2008, 20–26. ISBN 978–988–17408–1-6 ISBN 978-988-17408-1-6Google Scholar
- Kohlrausch F: Pogg Ann Phys. 1863, 119: 352.Google Scholar
- Williams G, Watts DC: Trans Faraday Soc. 1970, 66: 80. 10.1039/tf9706600080View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alvarez F, Alegria A, Colmenero J: Phys Rev B. 1991, 44: 7306. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.7306View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bello A, Laredo E, Grimau M: Phys Rev B. 1999, 60: 12764. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.12764View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bokov AA, Mahesh Kumar M, Xu Z, Ye Z-G: Phys Rev B. 2001, 64: 224101. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.224101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jonscher AK: Universal Relaxation Law–A sequel to Dielectric Relaxation in Solids. Chelsea Dielectrics Press, London; 1996.Google Scholar
- Dissado LA, Hill RM: Nature. 1979, 279: 685. 10.1038/279685a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hunt A: J Non-Crystalline Solids. 1995, 183: 109. 10.1016/0022-3093(94)00556-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Waser R, Klee M: Inter Ferro. 1992, 2: 257.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scher H, Montroll EW: Phys Rev B. 1975, 12: 2455. 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.2455View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wolters SR, Van Der Schoot JJ: J Appl Phys. 1985, 58: 831. 10.1063/1.336152View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reisinger H, Steinlesberger G, Jakschik S, Gutsche M, Hecht T, Leonhard M, Schroder U, Seidl H, Schumann D: Tech Dig –Int Electron Devices Meet. 2001, 267.Google Scholar
- Yu H, Liu H, Hao H, Guo L, Jin C, Yu Z, Cao M: Appl Phys Lett. 2007, 91: 222911. 10.1063/1.2820446View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sivakumar N, Narayanasamy A, Chinnasamy CN, Jeyadevan B: J Phys: Condens Matter. 2007, 19: 386201. 10.1088/0953-8984/19/38/386201Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.