Open Access

Propargylic substitution reactions with various nucleophilic compounds using efficient and recyclable mesoporous silica spheres embedded with FeCo/graphitic shell nanocrystals

Nanoscale Research Letters201510:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-10-2

Received: 18 November 2014

Accepted: 9 December 2014

Published: 23 January 2015

Abstract

Phosphomolybdic acid (PMA, H3PMo12O40) functioned as a catalyst for reactions of secondary propargylic alcohols and nucleophiles. Highly stable and magnetically recyclable mesoporous silica spheres (MMS) embedded with FeCo-graphitic carbon shell nanocrystals (FeCo/GC@MSS) were fabricated by a modified Stöber process and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method. The FeCo/GC@MSS were loaded with phosphomolybdic acid (PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS), and their catalytic activity was investigated. Propargylic reactions of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol with a wide range of nucleophiles bearing activating substituents were catalyzed under mild conditions. It was found that the MMS possess mesoporosities and have enough inner space to load FeCo and phosphomolybdic acid. The FeCo/GC@MSS were found to be chemically stable against acid etching and oxidation. This suggests that the nanocrystals can be used as a support for an acid catalyst. Moreover, the magnetic property of the nanocrystals enabled the facile separation of catalysts from the products.

Keywords

Recyclable Magnetic FeCo/GC Propargylic substitution Phosphomolybdic acid

Background

Electrophilic attack on aromatic carbons is a useful method for functionalizing aromatic compounds [13]. Electrophilic aromatic substitution is an organic reaction, in which an electrophile replaces an atom (usually hydrogen) appended to an aromatic system. Among these reactions, the most important are the nitration, halogenation, sulfonation, and acylation reactions of aromatic compounds. Propargylic substitution reactions have been intensively studied in recent years. In these reactions, activated and inactivated propargyl alcohols, propargyl acetates, and/or propargyl esters react with alcohols, thiols, amines, and other molecules that have C-nucleophiles and heteroatom-centered nucleophiles [4, 5].

Heteropoly acids have been the focus of extensive research in organic synthesis due to their high catalytic activity, ease of control, and low cost [6]. Among the various heteropoly acids, phosphomolybdic acid (PMA, H3PMo12O40) is one of the least expensive commercially available solid acids [711]. PMA not only enhances the activity of selected catalysts but also shows self-catalytic activity in various organic reactions [1115]. However, the recovery and reuse of PMA still remains a challenge. Our efforts toward green chemistry have led to the development of new synthetic methodologies.

Recently, we reported a simple one-step chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method to synthesize highly stable and magnetically recyclable mesoporous silica spheres (MSS) embedded with FeCo-graphitic carbon shell nanocrystals (FeCo/GC@MSS) [16]. The schematic strategy for the preparation of FeCo/GC@MSS and PMA loading is illustrated in Figure 1. In continuation of our previous studies on the catalytic properties of PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS as an inexpensive and eco-friendly reagent, we disclose O-nucleophilic substitution reactions of aryl propargyl methanol. We have shown that silica-supported PMA works as an excellent recyclable solid reagent in catalyzing propargylic substitution reactions. To investigate PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS as a solid reagent system, we disclose herein propargylic substitution reactions of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol with various nucleophilic compounds in acetonitrile.
Figure 1

Schematic diagram for the preparation of a PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS.

Methods

General remarks

Iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate (Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O, 99.99%), cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO3)2 · 6H2O, 99.999%), and phosphomolybdic acid (PMA) hydrate (H3PMo12O40 · 24H2O, 99.99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. Tetraethoxysilane (TEOS, 98%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and n-octadecyltrimethoxysilane (C18TMS, 85%) were purchased from TCI, Tokyo Japan. All chemicals were used as received without further purification.

Synthesis of FeCo/GC@MSS, FeCo/GC, and FeCo@MSS nanocrystals

Mesoporous silica spheres composed of mesoporous shell and solid core (approximately 400 nm) were prepared by modifying the Stöber process [15]. We added 1.00 g of MSS with 0.22 g (0.52 mmol) of Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O and 0.12 g (0.38 mmol) of Co(NO3)2 · 6H2O in 50 mL of methanol and then sonicated it for 1 h. The samples were then dried at 80°C and placed in a tube furnace and heated under H2 flow at 800°C. The samples were then subjected to a methane flow of 500 cm3/min−1 for 5 min. After cooling, the samples were washed with ethanol and collected by centrifugation. To obtain the FeCo/GC nanocrystals, the samples were etched with 15% hydrogen fluoride (HF) in H2O (75%) and ethanol (10%) to dissolve the silica. The procedure for the synthesis of FeCo@MSS was similar to that of FeCo/GC@MSS, except that the methane flow at 800°C for 5 min was replaced with H2 flow at 800°C.

Synthesis of (PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS) nanocrystals

To prepare PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS, 0.82 g of FeCo/GC@MSS nanoparticles were added slowly to a solution of H3PMo12O40 · 24H2O (0.09 g, 0.05 mmol) in methanol (10 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to obtain 10 wt% PMA in SiO2 (a greenish-black powder).

Characterization

The morphology and structure of the samples were investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL JEM-2100 F, Akishima-shi, Japan operated at 200 KV) with selected area electron diffraction patterns and energy dispersive analyses of X-ray emission. The samples for the TEM analyses were prepared by adding the diluted sample to ethanol drop-wise on a 300-mesh carbon support copper grid (Ted Pella, Inc., Redding, CA, USA). Powdered X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected on a Rigaku Miniflex II (4.5 KW) diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo) using Cu-Kα radiation at 30 kV and 15 mA. The magnetic measurements were carried out on a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer (Quantum Design MPMS SQUID-VSM, Quantum Design, San Diego, USA). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET)-specific surface areas and porosity of the samples were evaluated on the basis of nitrogen adsorption isotherms using a BELSORP-max instrument (BELSORP-max, Nippon Bell, Japan).

Propargylic substitution reactions of PMA@MSS@FeCo/GC nanocatalysts

Propargylic substitution reactions of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol were carried out in a 10-mL glass vial. PMA@MSS@FeCo/GC nanocatalysts (0.05 mol%), 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol (0.19 ml, 1.0 mmol), phenol (0.113 g, 1.2 mmol), and acetonitrile (5.0 mL) were added, and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at 323 K. Following the reaction, the nanoparticles were separated from the solution with a magnet. The reaction products were analyzed using a 1H NMR Varian Mercury Plus spectrometer (300 MHz) (Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Chemical shift values were recorded in parts per million relative to tetramethylsilane as an internal standard unless otherwise indicated, and the coupling constants were reported in Hertz.

Results and discussion

Synthesis and structural characterization

The major steps involved in the synthesis of PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS are highlighted in Figure 1. We prepared FeCo/GC@MSS as a light gray powder by modifying the Stöber process [15] and CVD method. The MSS were then used as templates for loading FeCo/GC and PMA. A 0.9 mmol of metal precursors, Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O and Co(NO3)2 · 6H2O, at a 58:42 molar ratio were loaded onto 1.0 g of the MSS by impregnation in methanol solutions, followed by solvent removal under reduced pressure. To deposit carbon on to the FeCo nanocrystals formed in the MSS, the metal-loaded MSS was heated to 800°C under H2 and then subjected to methane CVD. Once the MSS were cooled to room temperature, any metal impurities were removed by washing with a 10% aqueous HCl. When loading PMA on FeCo/GC@MSS (10 wt% of PMA in SiO2), FeCo/GC@MSS was added to PMA dissolved in methanol and then sonicated for 5 min. This was followed by stirring for 6 h at room temperature and solvent removal under reduced pressure to afford PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS as a light greenish powder.

The representatives FeCo/GC@MSS and PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS are compiled in Figures 2a and 1b, respectively. The TEM images of an FeCo/GC@MSS in the inset of Figure 2a and PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS in the inset of Figure 2b clearly show the FeCo/GC nanocrystals embedded in the MSS. After treatment of the FeCo/GC@MSS with HF to dissolve the silica, we obtained FeCo/GC nanocrystals with an average diameter of 5.6 ± 1.0 nm, as shown in Figure 2c. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum of the nanocrystals (lower inset of Figure 2c) shows a Fe/Co ratio of 50:50, which is a slightly higher Co content than the Fe/Co ratio of precursors. The electron diffraction (upper inset of Figure 2c) and XRD patterns (Figure 2d) were used to observe the crystal structure of FeCo. The crystal structure was identified as a body-centered-cubic (bcc). The crystallite size was determined for the (110) reflection of the XRD data (Figure 2d) by using the Debye-Scherrer equation [17]. It was found to be 5.3 nm, indicating a single-crystalline and spherical nature for the individual FeCo/GC nanocrystals.
Figure 2

Morphology and structure of FeCo/GC@MSS and PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS. TEM images of (a) FeCo/GC@MSS and (b) PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS (Insets are higher magnification images.). (c) TEM image of FeCo/GC nanocrystals (Upper inset is the electron diffraction pattern. Lower inset is the EDX spectrum. Copper is from the TEM grids.) (d) X-ray diffraction patterns.

The magnetic properties of the FeCo/GC@MSS were investigated by SQUID magnetometry. Figure 3a shows the magnetization hysteresis curves for the FeCo/GC@MSS sample. The saturation magnetization value was obtained as high as 211 emu/metal g. The BET surface area, total pore volume, and calculated average pore volume of the FeCo/GC@MSS were calculated to be 315.8 m2/g, 0.239 cm3/g, and 2.9 nm, respectively. The values are slightly smaller than those for the MSS (343.8 m2/g, 0.312 cm3/g, and 3.1 nm, respectively) due to the embedment of the approximately 5.6 nm FeCo/GC nanocrystals. Nevertheless, the N2 adsorption isotherms (Figure 3b) of the FeCo/GC@MSS show type IV curves, which is typical for mesoporous silica [18]. This indicates that the pores of FeCo/GC@MSS might have a sufficiently large inner space to allow high performance in catalytic reactions.The FeCo/GC@MSS also shows long-term chemical stability (Figure 3c). The samples were stored for 2 months in air and water and then etched with HCl. Both samples still exhibited excellent stability against HCl etching even after the air or water storage. However, the FeCo@MSS sample solutions prepared for comparison purpose turned green after the addition of HCl due to Fe and Co etching. This infers that FeCo/GC@MSS is still stable against oxidation for a long time in air or water due to the robustness of the single-layered graphitic shell.
Figure 3

Suitability of FeCo/GC@MSS for use in the reaction system. (a) Field-dependent magnetization hysteresis of FeCo/GC@MSS at 300 K. (b) Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm of MSS and FeCo/GC@MSS. (c) Photographs of 35% HCl solutions of (i, ii) FeCo/GC@MSS stored over a monitoring period of 2 months in air (i) and water (ii) and (iii) as-prepared FeCo@MSS. (d) A photograph of recycled PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS in acetonitrile in the presence of an external magnet. (e) TEM image of the PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS after the five sequential catalytic cycles.

Propargylic substitution reactions of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol with PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS

The catalytic activity of PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS was assessed by studying the propargylic substitution reactions of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol with phenol. Srihari et al. reported efficient solvents in propargylic substitution reactions using PMA catalysts [14]. Hydrophilic solvents such as water and PEG 400 showed low functional group conversion, whereas hydrophobic solvents such as acetonitrile, dichloromethane, and dichloroethane showed high conversion. Therefore, acetonitrile was selected as the solvent for investigating the catalytic activity of PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS. To optimize the reaction conditions, the amount of catalyst and reaction time were varied over a series of reactions. In general, it was found that increasing the amount of catalyst, reaction temperature, and reaction time were effective means of increasing conversion (Table 1, entries 1 to 7). Under common conditions at 323 K, conversion approaches 100% with a reaction time of 30 min and when 0.05 mol% PMA is present (Table 1, entry 5). The 0.05 mol% PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS was used in subsequent reactions owing to a reasonable turnover frequency (TOF) and conversion. For comparison, the corresponding homogeneous reaction was also carried out, under the same conditions described above (Table 1, entry 8). Compared with pure PMA, PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS showed similar catalytic activity. As expected, the MSS and FeCo/GC@MSS did not exhibit any catalytic activity (Table 1, entries 9, 10). Therefore, the observed catalytic conversion by PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS is attributed to the incorporated PMA clusters. As shown in Figure 3d, the resulting PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS catalyst is easily recycled by magnetic separation whilst keeping its high catalytic activity in propargylic substitution reactions of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol (Table 1, entries 11 to 14). As shown in Figure 3e, the morphology of the catalyst remained the same after five consecutive catalytic cycles.
Table 1

Propargylic substitution reactions of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol with phenol using PMA@MSS@FeCo/GC a

Entry

Catalyst (PMA mol%)

Time (min)

Temp. (°C)

Conv. (%)b

TOF (−h)

1

0.03 mol%

30

50

79

5,267

PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS

2

0.05 mol%

5

50

81

19,440

PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS

3

0.05 mol%

10

50

94

11,280

PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS

4

0.05 mol%

20

50

97

5,820

PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS

5

0.05 mol%

30

50

100

4,000

PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS

6

0.1 mol%

30

25

93

1,860

PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS

7

0.1 mol%

30

50

100

2,000

PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS

8

0.05 mol% PMA

30

50

95

3,800

9

FeCo/GC@MSSc

30

50

0

-

10

SiO2c

30

50

0

-

11

Recovered from number 5

30

50

100

4,000

12

Recovered from number 11

30

50

100

4,000

13

Recovered from number 12

30

50

100

4,000

14

Recovered from number 13

30

50

100

4,000

aReaction conditions: 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol (0.19 ml, 1.0 mmol), phenol (1.2 mmol), and acetonitrile (5.0 mL). bDetermined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Yields are based on the amount of propargylic alcohol. CAmount of compound based on calculated content in 0.05 mol% PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS, respectively.

We applied the optimized reaction procedure to the reactions of 1,3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-ol with various nucleophiles. Electron-donating substituents on the aromatic ring located near the nucleophiles were found to enhance the reactivity (Table 2, entries 1 to 4). For all the nucleophiles, substitution involved regioselective attack by the aromatic carbon with the highest electron density. Furthermore, allyl trimethyl silane underwent C-nucleophilic substitution under these reaction conditions (Table 2, entry 5). Conversely, 2-propene-1-ol, 2-propyn-1-ol, cyclopentanamine, and thiophenol afforded ether and thioether exclusively without C-nucleophilic-substituted products (Table 2, entries 6 to 9). This may be attributed to the more nucleophilic character of a heteroatom than carbon. Conversion of 2-propene-1-ol was higher than 2-propyn-1-ol owing to the difference in the inductive effects between the sp2 and sp character. Unfortunately, these nucleophiles showed poor reactivity in this reaction.
Table 2

Propargylic substitution reactions of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol with various nucleophilic compounds using PMA@MSS@FeCo/GC a

Entry

Substrate

Product

Conversion (%)b

1

100

2

99

3

94

4

75

5

67

6

93

7

76

8

31

9

79

aReaction conditions: 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol (0.19 ml, 1.0 mmol), nucleophile (1.2 mmol), acetonitrile (5.0 mL), catalyst (0.05 mol%), and time ( 30 min). bDetermined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Yields are based on the amount of propargylic alcohol.

Mechanisms of propargylation reactions have been proposed by several groups [19, 20]. The mechanism of the propargylic substitution reactions for PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS may follow these reported mechanisms. This reaction follows the SN1 mechanism and the propargyl cations act as reactive intermediates in the reaction. First, the hydroxyl group of propargylic alcohol is protonated by the H+ active site (Figure 4a), and it then generates propargylic carbenium ion through dehydration (Figure 4b). Next, an electron is donated from an electron-rich arene (such as phenol) to the carbenium compound (Figure 4c). In this step, the aromatic ring stabilizes the cation by resonance effects. Finally, the product is obtained by the removal of a proton from the previous intermediate, and this proton regenerates the H+-active site of PMA (Figure 4d).
Figure 4

Plausible mechanism for the PMA@FeCo/GC@MSS-catalyzed propargylic substitution reactions. (a) Protonation of hydroxyl group of propargylic alcohol. (b) Generation of propargylic carbenium ion by dehydration. (c) Donation of electron from electron-rich arene (d) removal of proton from the previous intermediate.

Conclusions

In summary, we have successfully prepared MSS embedded with FeCo/GC nanocrystals through a simple one-step CVD process. This superparamagnetic FeCo/GC@MSS showed high saturation magnetization and superior chemical stability against acid etching and oxidation. PMA-loaded FeCo/GC@MSS worked as a green catalyst for propargylic substitution reactions of various aromatic compounds with 1,3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-ol. The catalyst can be easily separated and reused at least five times without any appreciable loss in its catalytic efficiency, thereby showing great potential for large-scale applications. The results indicate that such materials can be used as catalysts in organic reactions.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a 2-year Research Grant of Pusan National University and the Ministry of Education (MOE) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through the Human Resource Training Project for Regional Innovation (No. 2012H1B8A2026225). KHP thank to the TJ Park Junior Faculty Fellowship and LG Yonam Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemistry and Chemistry Institute for Functional Materials, Pusan National University
(2)
Department of Chemistry, Sogang University

References

  1. Olah GA, Torok B, Joschek JP, Bucsi I, Esteves PM, Rasul G, Surya Prakash GK: Efficient chemoselective carboxylation of aromatics to arylcarboxylic acids with a superelectrophilically activated carbon dioxide-Al 2 Cl 6 /Al system.J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124:11379–91. 10.1021/ja020787oView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Schnatter WF, Rogers DW, Zavitsas AA: Electrophilic aromatic substitution: enthalpies of hydrogenation of the ring determine reactivities of C 6 H 5 X. The direction of the C 6 H 5 -X bond dipole determines orientation of the substitution.J Phys Chem A 2013, 117:13079–88. 10.1021/jp409623jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jayaraman A, Sterenberg BT: Electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions of a tungsten-coordinated phosphirenyl triflate.Organometallics 2014, 33:522–30. 10.1021/om401050wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yadav JS, Reddy BVS, Rao KVR, Narender R: InBr 3 -catalyzed annulations of cyclic 1,3-diketones with aryl propargyl alcohols: a novel synthesis of 2,4-diaryldihydropyrans.Tetrahedron Lett 2009, 50:3963–5. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.04.088View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Srihari P, Bhunia DC, Sreedhar P, Mandal SS, Reddy JSS, Yadav JS: Iodine-catalyzed C- and O-nucleophilic substitution reactions of aryl-propargyl methanols.Tetrahedron Lett 2007, 48:8120–4. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.09.123View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Misono M, Ono I, Koyano G, Aoshima A: Heteropolyacids. Versatile green catalysts usable in a variety of reaction media.Pure Appl Chem 2000, 72:1305–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Reddy BVS, Narasimhulu G, Lakshumma PS, Reddy YV, Yadav JS: Phosphomolybdic acid: a highly efficient solid acid catalyst for the synthesis of trans-4,5-disubstituted cyclopentenones.Tetrahedron Lett 2012, 53:1776–9. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.01.115View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Azizi N, Torkiyan L, Saidi MR: Highly efficient one-pot three-component Mannich reaction in water catalyzed by heteropoly acids.Org Lett 2006, 8:2079–82. 10.1021/ol060498vView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumar GD, Baskaran S: Heteropoly acid as a novel nitrene transfer agent: a facile and practical aziridination of olefins with Chloramine-T.Chem Commun 2004, 8:1026–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamamoto H, Anilkumar G, Tohma H, Kita Y: A novel and useful oxidative intramolecular coupling reaction of phenol ether derivatives on treatment with a combination of hypervalent iodine(III) reagent and heteropoly acid.Chem Eur J 2002, 8:5377–83. 10.1002/1521-3765(20021202)8:23<5377::AID-CHEM5377>3.0.CO;2-HView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Rafiee E, Jafari H: A practical and green approach towards synthesis of dihydropyrimidinones: using heteropoly acids as efficient catalysts.Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2006, 16:2463–6. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.01.087View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Seo MH, Choi SM, Kim HJ, Kim JH, Cho BK, Kim WB: A polyoxometalate-deposited Pt/CNT electrocatalyst via chemical synthesis for methanol electrooxidation.J Power Sources 2008, 179:81–6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.107View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Cui Z, Li CM, Jiang SP: PtRu catalysts supported on heteropolyacid and chitosan functionalized carbon nanotubes for methanol oxidation reaction of fuel cells.Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011, 13:16349–57. 10.1039/c1cp21271kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Srihari P, Reddy JSS, Mandal SS, Satyanarayana K, Yadav JS: PMA-silica gel catalyzed propargylation of aromatic compounds with arylpropargyl alcohols under solvent-free conditions.Synthesis-Stuttgart 2008, 12:1853–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Mallik S, Dash SS, Parida KM, Mohapatra BK: Synthesis, characterization, and catalytic activity of phosphomolybdic acid supported on hydrous zirconia.J Colloid Interf Sci 2006, 300:237–43. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Y, Kim YJ, Kim AY, Lee K, Jung MH, Hur NH, Park KH, Seo WS: Highly stable and magnetically recyclable mesoporous silica spheres embedded with FeCo/graphitic shell nanocrystals for supported catalysts.Chem Mater 2011, 23:5398–403. 10.1021/cm202451nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Cullity BD: Elements of X-ray Diffraction. 2nd edition. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1978.Google Scholar
  18. Brunauer S, Deming LS, Deming WE, Teller E: A theory of the van der Waals adsorption of gases.J Am Chem Soc 1940, 62:1723–32. 10.1021/ja01864a025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang T, Ma R-d, Liu L, Zhan Z-p: Solvent-free solid acid-catalyzed nucleophilic substitution of propargylic alcohols: a green approach for the synthesis of 1,4-diynes.Green Chem 2010, 12:1576–9. 10.1039/c0gc00117aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Masuyama Y, Hayashi M, Suzuki N: SnCl 2 -catalyzed propargylic substitution of propargylic alcohols with carbon and nitrogen nucleophiles.Eur J Org Chem 2013, 2013:2914–21. 10.1002/ejoc.201201673View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jang et al.; licensee Springer. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.