Skip to main content

High-quality reduced graphene oxide-nanocrystalline platinum hybrid materials prepared by simultaneous co-reduction of graphene oxide and chloroplatinic acid


Reduced graphene oxide-nanocrystalline platinum (RGO-Pt) hybrid materials were synthesized by simultaneous co-reduction of graphene oxide (GO) and chloroplatinic acid with sodium citrate in water at 80°C, of pH 7 and 10. The resultant RGO-Pt hybrid materials were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. Platinum (Pt) nanoparticles were anchored randomly onto the reduced GO (RGO) sheets with average mean diameters of 1.76 (pH 7) and 1.93 nm (pH 10). The significant Pt diffraction peaks and the decreased intensity of (002) peak in the XRD patterns of RGO-Pt hybrid materials confirmed that the Pt nanoparticles were anchored onto the RGO sheets and intercalated into the stacked RGO layers at these two pH values. The Pt loadings for the hybrid materials were determined as 36.83 (pH 7) and 49.18% (pH 10) by mass using XPS analysis. With the assistance of oleylamine, the resultant RGO-Pt hybrid materials were soluble in the nonpolar organic solvents, and the dispersion could remain stable for several months.


Graphene, a flat monolayer of two-dimensional honeycomb-structured carbon atoms, has attracted tremendous attention from both theoretical and experimental studies in recent years [16]. Its unique structural, mechanical, and electronic properties make it a promising candidate in many potential applications, such as sensors [79], electrodes [1013], lithium storage [14, 15], and hydrogen storage [16].

It is well known that carbon nanotubes (CNTs) deposited with platinum (Pt) nanoparticles exhibit outstanding catalytic activity [1722]. Possessing similar properties, graphene has a larger surface area (theoretical value of ~2,600 m2/g [23] as unwrapped single-wall CNTs) than that of CNTs. Furthermore, graphene/reduced graphene oxide (RGO) can be produced at a lower cost through large-scale chemical synthesis [24, 25]. All these advantages make the reduced graphene oxide-nanocrystalline platinum (RGO-Pt) hybrid materials even more attractive in engineering applications.

RGO-Pt hybrid materials have been successfully synthesized by several research groups [2634]. One way to synthesize the RGO-Pt hybrid materials is to reduce the graphene oxide (GO) sheets deposited with Pt precursor by H2[28, 31]. Ethylene glycol [27, 33, 34] and sodium borohydride [29, 30] have also been used as reducing agents to synthesize the RGO-Pt hybrid materials from the mixture of GO sheets and Pt precursors in the one-pot synthesis.

The monodispersity, the faceted uniformity, and the dispersion level of Pt nanocrystals significantly affect the high specificity in a catalytic process [35]. When used in the synthesis of the noble-metal nanocrystals [3638], sodium citrate, a mild reducing agent and stabilizer, can control well the size and morphology of the nanocrystals.

In this article, the synthesis of the RGO-Pt hybrid materials is presented using sodium citrate as the reducing agent and the stabilizer at 80°C. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of sodium citrate being used for the reduction of GO. The resultant RGO-Pt hybrid materials are soluble in nonpolar organic solvents assisted by oleylamine (OA) (Figure 1), which will be extremely valuable for future catalytic applications. The detailed characterizations of the RGO-Pt hybrid materials carried out in this study provide us with an insight into the utilization of this new graphene-based material.

Figure 1

A schematic illustration of the dispersed RGO-Pt hybrid materials assisted by OA molecules.

Materials and methods


Sodium nitrate (NaNO3, 99%), potassium permanganate (KMnO4, 99%), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 35%), concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 98%), oleylamine (C18H36NH2, 70%), sodium citrate dehydrate (Na3C6H5O7·2H2O, 99%), and concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl, 36.5%) were purchased from Aldrich. Chloroplatinic acid (H2PtCl6·x H2O, with Pt content approximately 40%) was used as received from BDH Chemical. Natural graphite (SP-1) was purchased from Bay Carbon. All solvents were purchased from Merck. The deionized (DI) water was produced using the Millipore Milli-Q water purification system.

Synthesis of RGO-Pt hybrid materials

The GO was synthesized according to the modified Hummers method [39], a process that had been described earlier [40]. The synthesis of the RGO-Pt hybrid material is a modification of the synthesis method of the Pt nanoparticles [41]. Fifty milligrams of as-prepared dried GO sample and 50 mg of H2PtCl6·x H2O were mixed in 50 mL of DI water under continuous stirring, purged with N2 at room temperature for 2 h, and the pH value of the mixture was approximately 2. The syntheses of two other batches, adjusted to the values of pH 7 and 10 by adding diluted NaOH solution, were carried out. Ten milliliters of 20 g/L sodium citrate solution was injected into the mixture after it was heated to 80°C. After being kept at 80°C for 24 h, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered. The residue was washed with DI water and acetone before freeze-drying, and kept aside until further use. The resultant products were denoted as RGO-Pt-2, RGO-Pt-7, and RGO-Pt-10 for the samples prepared at pH 2, 7, and 10, respectively. Two control syntheses were carried out under the same experimental conditions as RGO-Pt-10 without adding either the Pt precursor or the GO; the dried samples were denoted as RGO-NoPt-10 and Pt-10, respectively.

Ten milligrams of the prepared RGO-Pt hybrid materials was dispersed in 10 mL of 1,2-dichlorobenzene (DCB) with the addition of OA (0.1-0.2 mL) under sonication for 30 min. The clear solution of RGO-Pt hybrid materials in DCB can remain stable for several months.


Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were obtained using a JEOL JEM-2010 operated at 200 kV. The samples for the analysis were prepared by dropwise addition of dilute DCB solutions of the RGO-Pt hybrid materials onto carbon-coated copper grids. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using Bruker AXS D8 Advance (Cu Kα λ = 1.5406 Å). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed in an ultrahigh vacuum chamber, with a base pressure below 2.66 × 10-7 Pa at room temperature. Photoemission spectra were recorded using a Kratos Axis Ultra spectrometer equipped with a standard monochromatic Al Kα excitation source (h ν = 1486.71 eV). Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis was performed using a Perkin Elmer GX with potassium bromide dye for the preparation of the sample pellet. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out under air using thermogravimetric analyzer Perkin Elmer TGA 7. The samples were heated from room temperature to 900°C at a ramp rate of 10°C/min.

Results and discussion

The RGO-Pt hybrid materials were prepared from the co-reduction of GO and H2PtCl6 at 80°C at different pH values. The as-prepared RGO-Pt-2 appears brownish yellow and slightly darker than the pristine GO, while RGO-Pt-7 and RGO-Pt-10 show black color. This difference in color could be attributed to the reduction degree of the original GO sheets and the formation of the Pt nanoparticles. The RGO-Pt-2 can be easily dispersed in DI water, while RGO-Pt-7 and RGO-Pt-10 can be stably dispersed in nonpolar organic solvents assisted by OA.

Figure 2 shows the TEM images of the RGO-Pt hybrid materials prepared at different pH values of 2, 7, and 10 and the Pt nanoparticles synthesized at pH 10. At pH 2 (Figure 2a), no Pt nanoparticles are observed on the GO sheets. This could be because citrate is unable to reduce H2PtCl6 in this acidic condition [42]. At pH 7 (Figure 2b) and pH 10 (Figure 2c), the RGO sheets are randomly decorated with Pt nanoparticles with diameters of the order of a few nanometers. The density of the Pt nanoparticles for RGO-Pt-10 is higher than that forRGOPt-7. Few aggregates of the Pt nanoparticles are observed, suggesting the strong interactions between the Pt nanoparticles and the RGO sheets [27, 43]. However, without the support of the RGO sheets, the Pt nanoparticles synthesized at pH 10 are aggregated together, as shown in Figure 2d. This suggests the important role RGO plays in the co-reduction process to obtain unaggregated Pt nanoparticles.

Figure 2

TEM images of (a) RGO-Pt-2, (b) RGO-Pt-7, (c) RGO-Pt-10, and (d) Pt-10.

Enlarged TEM images (Figure 3a, b) show that the Pt nanoparticles on the graphene sheets are mostly quasi-spherical in shape. Figure 3e, f, shows the size distribution analysis performed by selecting 250 Pt nanoparticles from Figure 3a, b, respectively. For both the samples prepared at pH 7 and 10, the mean diameters of the Pt nanoparticles fall within the range of 1-4 nm, and it is mainly between 1 and 2 nm. Furthermore, no significant difference in the sizes of the Pt nanoparticles was observed for the samples synthesized at these two pH values.

Figure 3

TEM images of (a) RGO-Pt-7 and (b) RGO-Pt-10; HRTEM images of (c) RGO-Pt-7 and (d) RGO-Pt-10; and Pt particle-size counts and probability curves of (e) RGO-Pt-7 and (f) RGO-Pt-10 (250 particles were randomly selected for the calculation from (a) and (b), respectively).

The average mean diameters of the Pt nanoparticles are 1.76 and 1.93 nm for RGO-Pt-7 and RGO-Pt-10, respectively. The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images are shown in Figure 3c, d. The lattice spacing in both samples (RGO-Pt-7 and RGO-Pt-10) is measured as 0.226 nm, which corresponds to the (111) planes of the face-centered cubic Pt [34].

Figure 4 shows the XRD patterns of the RGO-NoPt-10, RGO-Pt-7, and RGO-Pt-10 powders. In Figure 4a, the characteristic peak at 2θ = 22.6° is ascribed to the (002) planes of the chemically reduced GO stacks [33], indicating the effective reduction of GO by citrate sodium at pH 10. The (002) diffraction intensity of RGO-Pt-7 at 2θ = 22.6° is lower than that of RGO-NoPt-10. Moreover, no obvious (002) diffraction peak is observed in the XRD pattern of RGO-Pt-10 because the regular stacks of RGO are destroyed by the intercalation of Pt nanoparticles [34]. In the XRD patterns of RGO-Pt-7 and RGO-Pt-10, the clear diffraction bands centered at 2θ of 39.9°, 46.3°, 67.7°, and 81.4° are corresponding to the (111), (200), (220), and (311) reflections of Pt nanocrystals [26], respectively. The broadening peaks are caused by the small size of the Pt nanoparticles. The size of the Pt nanoparticles can be estimated by means of the Scherrer equation based on the full-width at half-maximum of Pt (111) peak at 2θ = 39.7°. The calculated average sizes of the Pt nanoparticles are 1.97 and 2.07 nm for RGO-Pt-7 and RGO-Pt-10, respectively, which are in good agreement with TEM observations of this study. Elemental analysis based on the XPS data (Figure 5a) reveals that the O/C atomic ratios are 0.3738, 0.1889, and 0.1816 for GO, RGO-Pt-7, and RGO-Pt-10, respectively. The Pt mass loadings are 36.83 and 49.18% for RGO-Pt-7 and RGO-Pt-10. The reduced O/C atomic ratio and the decrease in the intensity of the O 1 s scan (Figure 5b) indicate the effective reduction of the GO sheets at pH 7 and 10. High-resolution spectra of the C 1 s region in Figure 5c, e-g show that both epoxide and hydroxyl functional groups are considerably decreased for RGO-Pt-7 and RGO-Pt-10. The Pt 4f 7/2 peak and Pt 4f 5/2 peak have been shifted to higher energy levels of 72.4 and 75.6 eV, respectively, for both the samples, which may be due to the interaction between the Pt nanoparticles and the reduced graphene sheets. The existence of Pt 4f signals (Figure 5a, d) observed for RGO-Pt-7 and RGO-Pt-10 further confirms that the RGO-Pt hybrid materials have been synthesized successfully [44].

Figure 4

XRD patterns of RGO-Pt hybrid materials: (a) RGO-NoPt-10, (b) RGO-Pt-7, and (c) RGO-Pt-10.

Figure 5

XPS spectra of GO, RGO-Pt-7, and RGO-Pt-10: (a) survey scan, high-resolution scan in the (b) O 1 s region, (c) C 1 s region, and (d) Pt 4f region; C 1 s XPS spectra of: (e) RGO-Pt-10, (f) RGO-Pt-7, and (g) GO indicate oxidation with three major components that correspond to carbon atoms in different functional groups: the sp 2-hybridized C-C, the C in C-OH bonds, and the carboxylate carbon.

Figure 6 presents the FTIR spectra of GO, RGO-Pt-2, RGO-Pt-7, and RGO-Pt-10. For the spectrum of GO, the broad band ranging from 3600 to 3000 cm-1 corresponds to the O-H stretching vibrations of adsorbed water molecules [45]. The bands at 1730 and 1039 cm-1 are assigned to the C = O and C-OH stretching vibrations of COOH groups, respectively [46]. The band at 1620 cm-1 is assigned to the vibration of the adsorbed water molecules as well as to the contributions from the skeletal vibrations of un-oxidized graphitic domains [47]. The spectrum of RGO-Pt-2 is similar to that of GO, indicating that the GO sheets were not reduced at pH 2. For the spectra of RGO-Pt-7 and RGO-Pt-10, the broad bands centered at 1212 and 1218 cm-1, respectively, are ascribed to the C-O stretching vibrations of the phenolic and carboxylic groups from the reduced GO sheets [48, 49]. Moreover, the broad bands at 1574 cm-1 for both the samples are assigned to the C = C skeletal vibration of graphene sheets [45], which confirms the successful reduction of GO sheets.

Figure 6

FTIR spectra of the GO, RGO-Pt-2, RGO-Pt-7, and RGO-Pt-10.

In Figure 7, the TGA curve of GO shows significant mass losses at 200 and 650°C due to the removal of oxygen-containing groups and carbon oxidation [40], respectively. These two major losses appear much smaller for RGO-Pt-10 and RGO-NoPt-10, which indicates the successful deoxygenation of GO at pH 10. The nearly parallel curves of RGO-Pt-10 and RGO-NoPt-10 suggest that the attachment of the Pt nanoparticles onto the graphene sheet did not lessen the thermal stability of the graphene sheets.

Figure 7

TGA curves of the GO, RGO-Pt-10, and RGO-NoPt-10.

The characterizations confirm that the RGO-Pt hybrid materials can be produced by a simultaneous co-reduction process at pH 7 and 10. In the acidic (pH 2) condition, neither GO nor the Pt precursor could be reduced by the reductant sodium citrate; however, in neutral (pH 7) and basic (pH 10) conditions, sodium citrate was able to reduce the GO to graphene and the Pt precursor to Pt nanoparticles. This could be explained by the release of H+ and CO2 during the reduction process involving sodium citrate as the reducing agent [50]. The increase of the pH values could consume the H+ and hence favors the reduction reaction. However, in the lower pH region, the high concentration of H+ would inhibit the reduction reaction from taking place.

The as-prepared RGO-Pt hybrid materials could not be dispersed well in any polar and nonpolar solutions because the oxygen-containing groups were decreased in the reduction process. However, the RGO-Pt hybrid materials assisted by OA could be dispersed well in nonpolar solvents such as DCB, toluene, and chlorobenzene. The dispersion can remain stable for several months. The dispersion of the RGO-Pt hybrid materials in DCB is caused by the coordination between OA and Pt nanoparticles, which is similar to the OA-assisted dispersion of CNT [5153]. The weak nucleophilicity of OA ensures that the Pt nanoparticles are kept bonded together with the reduced GO. In order to investigate the interaction between OA and reduced GO, the dispersion of the RGO-NoPt-10 was attempted in DCB with the assistance of OA. It is worth mentioning that the RGO-NoPt-10 could not be dispersed satisfactorily in DCB even with the assistance of OA. Therefore, it is believed that the intercalation of Pt nanoparticles into the stacked graphene sheets and the coordination with OA are crucial for the redispersion of RGO-Pt hybrid materials. As a weak ligand, OA can also be very easily washed away by common solvents, like ethanol [54, 55], hexane [56], and acetic acid [55].


It has been shown that RGO-Pt hybrid materials can be synthesized by simultaneous co-reduction of GO and H2PtCl6 with sodium citrate at modest temperatures in neutral and basic conditions. The attachment of Pt nanoparticles onto reduced GO sheets can effectively prevent the aggregation of GO during reduction. The reduced GO can work as excellent supporters for dispersing and stabilizing the Pt nanoparticles. The resultant RGO-Pt hybrid materials exhibit high thermal stability, and are soluble in nonpolar organic solvents with the assistance of OA. The dispersion of RGO-Pt hybrid material composite is important for future catalytic applications. This material could be useful for the fabrication of the thin film that can replace the Pt coating in the counter electrode of the dye-sensitized solar cells. It could also be used as the electrode material for proton exchange membrane fuel cells.



carbon nanotubes






Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy


graphene oxide


high-resolution TEM






reduced GO


reduced graphene oxide-nanocrystalline platinum


transmission electron microscopy

X-ray diffraction (XRD):

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).


  1. 1.

    Zhang Y, Tan YW, Stormer HL, Kim P: Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. Nature 2005, 438: 201–204. 10.1038/nature04235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Berger C, Song Z, Li X, Wu X, Brown N, Naud C, Mayou D, Li T, Hass J, Marchenkov AN, et al.: Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. Science 2006, 312: 1191–1196. 10.1126/science.1125925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Geim AK, Novoselov KS: The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 2007, 6: 183–191. 10.1038/nmat1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Castro Neto AH, Guinea F, Peres NMR, Novoselov KS, Geim AK: The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 2009, 81: 109–162. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Park S, Ruoff RS: Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol 2009, 4: 217–224. 10.1038/nnano.2009.58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rao CNR, Sood AK, Subrahmanyam KS, Govindaraj A: the new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew Chem Int Edit 2009, 48: 7752–7777. 10.1002/anie.200901678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ang PK, Chen W, Wee ATS, Kian PL: Solution-gated epitaxial graphene as pH sensor. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 14392–14393. 10.1021/ja805090z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sakhaee-Pour A, Ahmadian MT, Vafai A: Applications of single-layered graphene sheets as mass sensors and atomistic dust detectors. Solid State Commun 2008, 145: 168–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Robinson JT, Perkins FK, Snow ES, Wei Z, Sheehan PE: Reduced graphene oxide molecular sensors. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3137–3140. 10.1021/nl8013007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Paek SM, Yoo E, Honma I: Enhanced cyclic performance and lithium storage capacity of SnO2/graphene nanoporous electrodes with three-dimensionally delaminated flexible structure. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 72–75. 10.1021/nl802484w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kim KS, Zhao Y, Jang H, Lee SY, Kim JM, Ahn JH, Kim P, Choi JY, Hong BH: Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 2009, 457: 706–710. 10.1038/nature07719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Di CA, Wei D, Yu G, Liu Y, Guo Y, Zhu D: Patterned graphene as source/drain electrodes for bottom-contact organic field-effect transistors. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 3289–3293. 10.1002/adma.200800150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wang X, Zhi L, Müllen K: Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 323–327. 10.1021/nl072838r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang G, Shen X, Yao J, Park J: Graphene nanosheets for enhanced lithium storage in lithium ion batteries. Carbon 2009, 47: 2049–2053. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.03.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yoo EJ, Kim J, Hosono E, Zhou HS, Kudo T, Honma I: Large reversible Li storage of graphene nanosheet families for use in rechargeable lithium ion batteries. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 2277–2282. 10.1021/nl800957b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dimitrakakis GK, Tylianakis E, Froudakis GE: Pillared graphene: a new 3-D network nanostructure for enhanced hydrogen storage. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3166–3170. 10.1021/nl801417w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yu R, Chen L, Liu Q, Lin J, Tan KL, Ng SC, Chan HSO, Xu GQ, Hor TSA: Platinum deposition on carbon nanotubes via chemical modification. Chem Mater 1998, 10: 718–722. 10.1021/cm970364z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lordi V, Yao N, Wei J: Method for supporting platinum on single-walled carbon nanotubes for a selective hydrogenation catalyst. Chem Mater 2001, 13: 733–737. 10.1021/cm000210a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Li W, Liang C, Zhou W, Qiu J, Sun G, Xin Q: Preparation and characterization of multiwalled carbon nanotube-supported platinum for cathode catalysts of direct methanol fuel cells. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107: 6292–6299. 10.1021/jp022505c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sun CL, Chen LC, Su MC, Hong LS, Chyan O, Hsu CY, Chen KH, Chang TF, Chang L: Ultrafine platinum nanoparticles uniformly dispersed on arrayed CNx nanotubes with high electrochemical activity. Chem Mater 2005, 17: 3749–3753. 10.1021/cm050107r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hull RV, Li L, Xing Y, Chusuei CC: Pt nanoparticle binding on functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chem Mater 2006, 18: 1780–1788. 10.1021/cm0518978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yang DQ, Sun S, Dodelet JP, Sacher E: A facile route for the self-organized high-density decoration of Pt nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem C 2008, 112: 11717–11721. 10.1021/jp802371p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS: Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 2006, 442: 282–286. 10.1038/nature04969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li D, Müller MB, Gilje S, Kaner RB, Wallace GG: Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol 2008, 3: 101–105. 10.1038/nnano.2007.451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Choucair M, Thordarson P, Stride JA: Gram-scale production of graphene based on solvothermal synthesis and sonication. Nat Nanotechnol 2009, 4: 30–33. 10.1038/nnano.2008.365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Si Y, Samulski ET: Exfoliated graphene separated by platinum nanoparticles. Chem Mater 2008, 20: 6792–6797. 10.1021/cm801356a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Xu C, Wang X, Zhu J: Graphene - metal particle nanocomposites. J Phys Chem C 2008, 112: 19841–19845. 10.1021/jp807989b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kou R, Shao Y, Wang D, Engelhard MH, Kwak JH, Wang J, Viswanathan VV, Wang C, Lin Y, Wang Y, et al.: Enhanced activity and stability of Pt catalysts on functionalized graphene sheets for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Electrochem Commun 2009, 11: 954–957. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.02.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Li Y, Tang L, Li J: Preparation and electrochemical performance for methanol oxidation of Pt/graphene nanocomposites. Electrochem Commun 2009, 11: 846–849. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Seger B, Kamat PV: Electrocatalytically active graphene-platinum nanocomposites. Role of 2-D carbon support in PEM fuel cells. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 7990–7995. 10.1021/jp900360k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yoo E, Okata T, Akita T, Kohyama M, Nakamura J, Honma I: Enhanced electrocatalytic activity of Pt subnanoclusters on graphene nanosheet surface. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 2255–2259. 10.1021/nl900397t

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bong S, Kim YR, Kim I, Woo S, Uhm S, Lee J, Kim H: Graphene supported electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation. Electrochem Commun 2010, 12: 129–131. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dong L, Gari RRS, Li Z, Craig MM, Hou S: Graphene-supported platinum and platinum-ruthenium nanoparticles with high electrocatalytic activity for methanol and ethanol oxidation. Carbon 2010, 48: 781–787. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Li Y, Gao W, Ci L, Wang C, Ajayan PM: Catalytic performance of Pt nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide for methanol electro-oxidation. Carbon 2010, 48: 1124–1130. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Herricks T, Chen J, Xia Y: Polyol synthesis of platinum nanoparticles: control of morphology with sodium nitrate. Nano Lett 2004, 4: 2367–2371. 10.1021/nl048570a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Furlong DN, Launikonis A, Sasse WHF, Sanders JV: Colloidal platinum sols. Preparation, characterization and stability towards salt. J Chem Soc Farad T 1 1984, 80: 571–588. 10.1039/f19848000571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Dong X, Ji X, Wu H, Zhao L, Li J, Yang W: Shape control of silver nanoparticles by stepwise citrate reduction. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 6573–6576. 10.1021/jp900775b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Van Rheenen PR, McKelvy MJ, Glaunsinger WS: Synthesis and characterization of small platinum particles formed by the chemical reduction of chloroplatinic acid. J Solid State Chem 1987, 67: 151–169. 10.1016/0022-4596(87)90350-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hummers WS, Offeman RE: Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 1958, 80: 1339–1339. 10.1021/ja01539a017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Liu J, Jeong H, Liu J, Lee K, Park JY, Ahn YH, Lee S: Reduction of functionalized graphite oxides by trioctylphosphine in non-polar organic solvents. Carbon 2010, 48: 2282–2289. 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Harriman A, Millward GR, Neta P, Richoux MC, Thomas JM: Interfacial electron-transfer reactions betweem platinum colloids and reducing radicals in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem 1988, 92: 1286–1290. 10.1021/j100316a054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lin C-S, Khan MR, Lin SD: Platinum states in citrate sols by EXAFS. J Colloid Interface Sci 2005, 287: 366–369. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Georgakilas V, Gournis D, Tzitzios V, Pasquato L, Guldi DM, Prato M: Decorating carbon nanotubes with metal or semiconductor nanoparticles. J Mater Chem 2007, 17: 2679–2694. 10.1039/b700857k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Guo S, Dong S, Wang E: Three-dimensional Pt-on-Pd bimetallic nanodendrites supported on graphene nanosheet: facile synthesis and used as an advanced nanoelectrocatalyst for methanol oxidation. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 547–555. 10.1021/nn9014483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Szabó T, Berkesi O, Dékány I: DRIFT study of deuterium-exchanged graphite oxide. Carbon 2005, 43: 3186–3189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Titelman GI, Gelman V, Bron S, Khalfin RL, Cohen Y, Bianco-Peled H: Characteristics and microstructure of aqueous colloidal dispersions of graphite oxide. Carbon 2005, 43: 641–649. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.10.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fuente E, Menendez JA, Diez MA, Suarez D, Montes-Moran MA: Infrared spectroscopy of carbon materials: a quantum chemical study of model compounds. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107: 6350–6359. 10.1021/jp027482g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mahalakshmy R, Indraneel P, Viswanathan B: Surface functionalities of nitric acid treated carbon: A density functional theory based vibrational analysis. Indian J Chem A 2009, 48A: 352–356.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Nethravathi C, Nisha T, Ravishankar N, Shivakumara C, Rajamathi M: Graphene-nanocrystalline metal sulphide composites produced by a one-pot reaction starting from graphite oxide. Carbon 2009, 47: 2054–2059. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.03.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Pron'kin SN, Tsirlina GA, Petrii OA, Vassiliev SY: Nanoparticles of Pt hydrosol immobilised on Au support: An approach to the study of structural effects in electrocatalysis. Electrochim Acta 2001, 46: 2343–2351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Chattopadhyay D, Galeska I, Papadimitrakopoulos F: A route for bulk separation of semiconducting from metallic single-wall carbon nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125: 3370–3375. 10.1021/ja028599l

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Huang W, Fernando S, Lin Y, Zhou B, Allard LF, Sun YP: Preferential solubilization of smaller single-walled carbon nanotubes in sequential functionalization reactions. Langmuir 2003, 19: 7084–7088. 10.1021/la0301893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tzitzios V, Georgakilas V, Oikonomou E, Karakassides M, Petridis D: Synthesis and characterization of carbon nanotube/metal nanoparticle composites well dispersed in organic media. Carbon 2006, 44: 848–853. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Klokkenburg M, Hilhorst J, Erné BH: Surface analysis of magnetite nanoparticles in cyclohexane solutions of oleic acid and oleylamine. Vib Spectrosc 2007, 43: 243–248. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2006.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Mazumder V, Sun S: Oleylamine-mediated synthesis of Pd nanoparticles for catalytic formic acid oxidation. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 4588–4589. 10.1021/ja9004915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Bu W, Chen Z, Chen F, Shi J: Oleic acid/oleylamine cooperative-controlled crystallization mechanism for monodisperse tetragonal bipyramid NaLa(MoO4)2 nanocrystals. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 12176–12185. 10.1021/jp901437a

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to acknowledge the Clean Energy Research Program under the National Research Foundation of Singapore for their financial support (Grant No. NRF2007EWT-CERP01-0420).

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jincheng Liu or Darren Delai Sun.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

YW and JL did the synthetic and characteristic job in this journal. JL gave the advice and guide the experiment including the using of oleylamine to disperse the RGO-Pt composite in organic solvents. LL helped in the test of FTIR. For the writing of manuscript, YW wrote the manuscript, revised by JL and prof DS. LL did some spelling check.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Liu, J., Liu, L. et al. High-quality reduced graphene oxide-nanocrystalline platinum hybrid materials prepared by simultaneous co-reduction of graphene oxide and chloroplatinic acid. Nanoscale Res Lett 6, 241 (2011).

Download citation


  • Graphene Oxide
  • Graphene Sheet
  • Sodium Citrate
  • Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell