- Nano Express
- Open Access
High degree of polarization of the near-band-edge photoluminescence in ZnO nanowires
Nanoscale Research Letters volume 6, Article number: 501 (2011)
We investigated the polarization dependence of the near-band-edge photoluminescence in ZnO strain-free nanowires grown by vapor phase technique. The emission is polarized perpendicular to the nanowire axis with a large polarization ratio (as high as 0.84 at 4.2 K and 0.63 at 300 K). The observed polarization ratio is explained in terms of selection rules for excitonic transitions derived from the k·p theory for ZnO. The temperature dependence of the polarization ratio evidences a gradual activation of the X C excitonic transition.
PACS: 78.55.Cr, 77.22.Ej, 81.07.Gf.
One-dimensional nanoscale semiconductors have recently attracted considerable attention as promising candidates for innovative device applications. Their high surface to volume ratio can be exploited for the development of a new generation of chemical and biological sensors [1–3]. The wide bandgap (3.37 eV) of ZnO associated with its large exciton binding energy (60 meV) also makes it one of the most promising materials for photonic devices, such as light-emitting diodes  and lasers . Thanks to the spatial separation of photogenerated carriers, UV photodetectors with a very high photoconductive gain based on ZnO nanowires (NWs) have been demonstrated . It has been shown that the photodetection properties of ZnO NWs depend on the light polarization .
The photoluminescence of ZnO is typically composed of a near-band-edge (NBE) peak due to excitonic recombination and of a broad emission band in the visible range related to deep defect states [8–10]. The polarization properties of the luminescence of ZnO have been studied in bulk crystals [11–15]. However, these studies provided no theoretical explanation of the polarization behavior, especially of its temperature dependence. In the specific case of NWs, several studies have been carried out, but they were focused on the interpretation of the different behavior of defect and NBE luminescence [16, 17]. As shown in other semiconductor NW systems , the polarization dependence in NWs results from two competitive phenomena: bulk crystal symmetry (imposing polarization perpendicular to c-axis)  and dielectric contrast in thin NWs (privileging polarization parallel to the NW axis) [7, 20–23].
In this work, we have studied the polarization-resolved microphotoluminescence (μ-PL) of ZnO nanowires. We measured the polarization dependence of the NBE luminescence for temperature from 4.2 to 300 K. The experimental results are interpreted in the framework of the k·p model, allowing for the evaluation of the polarization ratio for each exciton type in bulk ZnO. The temperature dependence of the polarization ratio evidences a gradual activation of the X C excitonic transition.
ZnO NWs are prepared by means of vapor transport process, in which the source material is vaporized and transported by a gas carrier towards the substrates where it condenses . The experimental setup consists of a furnace capable to reach temperatures needed for oxide evaporation, a vacuum-sealed alumina tube connected to a vacuum pump, an automated valve, and a mass flow meter to control pressure and carrier flux. Adjusting the deposition conditions such as temperature of evaporation and carrier gas composition and flux, one-dimensional nanostructures can be obtained.
Platinum catalyst particles are firstly dispersed onto silicon substrates by DC magnetron sputtering at a working pressure of 5 × 10-3 mbar and 50 W applied power. The source material is positioned at the middle of the alumina tube and evaporated at a temperature of 1,370°C at a pressure of 100 mbar. The platinum catalyzed substrates are placed onto an alumina holder and positioned inside the tube in an area corresponding to a temperature T = 660°C. Furnace heating from room temperature to 1,370°C lasts 1.5 h. During furnace heating and cooling, a reverse Ar gas flow (from the substrates to the powder) is applied to avoid uncontrolled mass deposition under transient conditions. Once the desired temperature is reached, the deposition conditions are kept for 15 min, and afterwards, the furnace is cooled down to room temperature.
As seen in Figure 1a, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis shows that the NWs are single crystalline ZnO with a wurtzite structure. The NW axis is oriented along the  direction, and the structure is free from extended defects. The high-resolution TEM images evidence well-defined lateral sidewalls, parallel to the wire growth direction. No impurities or precipitates have been detected within the accuracy of the energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy performed in the TEM. The NW morphology was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A typical top-view SEM image of the as-grown NW ensemble is shown in Figure 1b. The SEM analyses show that the NWs do not have a specific direction with respect to the substrate. The diameter is dispersed in the range of 20 to 100 nm and the length is in the range of 500 nm to 5 μm.
Results and discussions
For μ-PL studies, single NWs were detached by ultrasound bath from their substrates and dispersed in ethanol on Si substrates patterned with alignment marks. The surface density of NWs is controlled by dispersion in the range of 1 to 5 × 106 NWs/cm2, which is low enough to avoid simultaneous optical excitation of several wires with different orientations. The dispersed NWs do not show any bending and are free of strain. Polarization-resolved μ-PL experiments have been performed in the temperature interval of 4.2 to 300 K. The samples were cooled down in a continuous-flow liquid He cryostat and excited by means of a frequency-doubled continuous-wave Ar++ ion laser at 244 nm. The laser was focused on the substrate surface in a spot with a diameter of 3 μm by means of a UV microscope objective with 0.4 numerical aperture. The excitation power was set in the range of 10 to 50 μW. The sample was imaged through a UV-sensitive camera in order to visualize the luminescence spot and to locate the NW with respect to the alignment marks. μ-PL spectra were measured using a Jobin Yvon HR460 spectrometer (Horiba Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a 600- or 1,800-grooves/mm grating and a charge-coupled device camera. The energy resolution of the setup during these experiments is around 1 meV. In order to analyze the polarization of the single NW emission, a linear polarizer was placed at the entrance of the spectrometer. For each individual NW, a series of spectra was collected at different angles of the polarizer axis, which was varied over the whole interval 0° to 360° with a 15° step. The orientation of the NW with respect to the polarizer axis, as well as its isolation from other dispersed nanowires, has been assessed by SEM measurements performed after the optical characterization. The experiment was carried out on ten NWs, yielding a good reproducibility.
Using the alignment marks as a reference frame, we identified the polarizer angles corresponding to π- (light with the electric field E ┴ c-axis) and σ- (E // c-axis) polarizations for each wire. The polarization ratio is defined as:
where I π and I σ are the integrals of the PL intensity for the π and σ polarizations, respectively.
The polarization of the NBE emission is related to the selection rules for the excitonic transitions, which can be deduced from the k·p theory . The polarization ratio of the three exciton types in strain-free crystal can be expressed as a function of the band parameters of ZnO. The interband momentum-matrix elements proportional to the PL intensity for σ and π polarization are reported in the Table 1. It shows that the X A exciton (formed by an electron bound to a heavy hole) is purely polarized perpendicular to the c-axis due to the selection rules in wurtzite crystal. The X B exciton (an electron bound to a light hole) is strongly polarized perpendicular to the c-axis, whereas the X C exciton (an electron bound to a split-off hole) is strongly polarized parallel to the c-axis. The X C exciton has a much higher energy than the X A one (energy difference ΔE CA between the X C and X A is 48 meV). Therefore, the NBE photoluminescence is dominated by the lower-energy X A exciton and, in consequence, is expected to be strongly polarized perpendicular to the c-axis even at room temperature (k B T ≈ 25 meV < ΔE CA). It should be noted that many-particle processes can potentially influence the emission polarization. In the polarization analyses, we approximate the NBE emission as originating solely from the X A bound and free excitons and we neglect the effect of phonon replicas, which are one order of magnitude weaker than the main peak and which could not be detected in single nanowire spectra.
The PL spectrum of the NW ensemble collected at 4.2 K is reported in Figure 2a. It presents a broad NBE emission peaked at 3.357 eV consisting of different contributions from the bound states of the X A exciton and possibly a contribution of X B exciton, which cannot be separately resolved. In addition, a weak shoulder is observed at high energy (3.41 eV) which is related to the X C exciton. The μ-PL spectra of two single NWs recorded with a spectral resolution of 800 μeV are reported in Figure 2b. All spectra exhibit three narrow peaks with linewidth as low as 1.5 meV. These peaks can be attributed to the different bound states of X A exciton. The two predominant peaks at 3.357 and 3.361 eV are attributed to the I 9 and I 6 lines related to the neutral donor-bound exciton D°X A, respectively, bound to Al and In . Alternatively, as studied by Meyer et al. , theses lines could be related to the neutral donor-bound exciton D°X A and D°X B. The latter interpretation is less probable since the relative intensity of the peaks does not match with the expected population of the corresponding excitonic states at low temperature. In the following analyses, we use the first attribution; however, the conclusions also remain valid for the second one. At higher energy (3.366 eV), we notice a third peak related to a surface bound X A exciton [27, 28]. The intensity of this peak varies from wire to wire due to the NW size dispersion.
Typical μ-PL spectra recorded at T = 4.2 K for σ- and π-polarizations are reported in Figure 3. By changing the polarization from σ to π, we observe that the spectral shape remains the same within the experimental accuracy, but the PL intensity integrated on the entire spectrum varies of about a factor of 12. This large contrast corresponds to a polarization ratio as high as 0.85. The statistics over ten NWs yields an average polarization ratio of 0.84 with a standard deviation of 0.05. The dependence of the PL intensity on the angle of polarization can be well fitted by a cosine-squared law I ≈ cos2(π/2 - θ), where θ is the angle between the analyzer and the NW axis determined from the SEM analyses. The maximum luminescence intensity is obtained when the analyzer is perpendicular to the c-axis of the NW (π-polarization). From the polarization selection rules, an even higher polarization ratio of 0.98 is expected. The difference between the experimental observation and the theoretical prediction can possibly be explained by a partial depolarization due to the diffraction from the NW of the luminescence exiting the NW extremities. In addition, the dielectric contrast between the NW and its environment, and the elongated shape of ZnO NWs with small diameter (<80 nm), should favor the emission of light polarized parallel to the NW axis [20, 21]. However, this effect cannot compete with the high anisotropy of the emission polarization. The polarization of the ZnO luminescence perpendicular to the NW axis is dictated by the excitonic selection rules.
The temperature dependence of the polarization ratio integrated on the whole spectrum is reported in the inset to the Figure 4. The polarization ratio decreases when the temperature increases from P = 0.85 at T = 4 K to P = 0.63 at T = 300 K. This effect is due to the progressive thermal activation of higher energy excitons, in particular of the X C having a different symmetry. However, the X C population remains weak even at room temperature, which explains a high polarization ratio (above 0.63) over the whole interval T = 4 to 300 K.
It is difficult to observe the gradual activation of the X C emission directly from the μ-PL spectra because of the very weak signal associated with this transition. However, the X C luminescence can be evidenced by analyzing the energy-dependent polarization ratio P(E):
at different temperatures, where I(E) p is the PL intensity at energy E in the p polarization. Figure 4 reports the P(E) for 70 and 150 K. (The temperature range is restricted within 70 to 150 K due to the extremely low signal above 3.38 eV at low temperatures and to the decrease of the overall luminescence intensity at high temperature). For the energy region between 3.28 and 3.38 eV, the signal arises from the X A and thermally activated X B excitonic transitions. Therefore, the polarization ratio remains high (>0.85) in this interval and is nearly temperature independent. At higher energy, around 3.41 eV, the polarization ratio decreases in correspondence of the emission of the X C exciton. It should be noted that in spite of the weak signal in the spectral range corresponding to the X C emission, the signal-to-noise ratio is about 20 at 3.40 eV. Therefore, the maximum possible error on the polarization ratio induced by the noise is less than 0.1. With increasing temperature, the dip in the P(E) dependence is amplified and progressively shifts towards lower energy. This behavior reflects the progressive thermal activation of the X C excitonic emission and the ZnO bandgap reduction described by the Varshni law .
In conclusion, we have studied the optical properties of ZnO nanowires grown by evaporation technique. Nanowires have defect-free single crystalline structure as shown by high-resolutions TEM (HRTEM) analysis. The nanowires are characterized by an intense photoluminescence with a spectral broadening below 2 meV. We have investigated the polarization dependence of the near-band-edge photoluminescence in ZnO strain-free nanowires. They exhibit a polarization ratio as high as 0.84. We show that these observations are consistent with the k·p theory and with the exciton selection rules. In particular, the weak dependence of the integrated polarization ratio P is a consequence of the large energy difference between X A and X C excitons. However, the analysis of the energy-resolved polarization ratio P(E) at different temperatures allows for the observation of the progressive activation of the X C exciton.
near band edge
scanning electron microscopy
transmission electron microscopy.
Wan Q, Li QH, Chen YJ, Wang TH, He XL, Li JP, Lin CL: Fabrication and ethanol sensing characteristics of ZnO nanowire gas sensors. Applied Physics Letters 2004, 84: 3654. 10.1063/1.1738932
Baratto C, Todros S, Faglia G, Comini E, Sberveglieri G, Lettieri S, Santamaria L, Maddalena P: Luminescence response of ZnO nanowires to gas adsorption. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2009, 140: 461–466. 10.1016/j.snb.2009.05.018
Comini E, Baratto C, Faglia G, Feronni M, Vomiero A, Sberveglieri G: Quasi-one dimensional metal oxide semiconductors: preparation, characterization and application as chemical sensors. Progress in Materials Science 2009, 54: 1–67. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.003
Xu S, Xu C, Liu Y, Hu Y, Yang R, Yang Q, Ryou JH, Kim HJ, Lochner Z, Choi S, Dupuis R, Wang ZL: Ordered nanowire array blue/near-UV light emitting diodes. Advanced Materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla) 2010, 0245: 1–5.
Huang MH, Mao S, Feick H, Yan H, Wu Y, Kind H, Weber E, Russo R, Yang P: Room-temperature ultraviolet nanowire nanolasers. Science 2001, 292: 1897–1899. 10.1126/science.1060367
Soci C, Zhang A, Xiang B, Dayeh A, Aplin DPR, Park J, Bao XY, Lo YH, Wang D: ZnO nanowire UV photodetectors with high internal gain. Nano Letters 2007, 7: 1003–1009. 10.1021/nl070111x
Fan Z, Chang P-chun, Lu JG, Walter EC, Penner RM, Lin CH, Lee HP: Photoluminescence and polarized photodetection of single ZnO nanowires. Applied Physics Letters 2004, 85: 6128. 10.1063/1.1841453
Hu JQ, Bando Y: Growth and optical properties of single-crystal tubular ZnO whiskers. Applied Physics Letters 2003, 82: 1401. 10.1063/1.1558899
Vanheusden K, Warren WL, Seager CH, Tallant DR, Voigt JA, Gnade BE: Mechanisms behind green photoluminescence in ZnO phosphor powders. Journal of Applied Physics 1996, 79: 7983. 10.1063/1.362349
Studenikin SA, Cocivera M: Time-resolved luminescence and photoconductivity of polycrystalline ZnO films. Journal of Applied Physics 2002, 91: 5060. 10.1063/1.1461890
Nam YS, Lee SW, Baek KS, Chang SK, Song JH, Song JH, Han SK, Hong SK, Yao T: Anisotropic optical properties of free and bound excitons in highly strained A-plane ZnO investigated with polarized photoreflectance and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Applied Physics Letters 2008, 92: 201907. 10.1063/1.2930683
Matsui H, Tabata H: In-plane anisotropy of polarized photoluminescence in M-plane (1010) ZnO and MgZnO/ZnO multiple quantum wells. Applied Physics Letters 2009, 94: 161907. 10.1063/1.3124243
Thomas DG: The exciton spectrum of zinc oxide. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 1960, 15: 86–96. 10.1016/0022-3697(60)90104-9
Hopfield JJ: Fine structure in the optical absorption edge of anisotropic crystals. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 1960, 15: 97–107. 10.1016/0022-3697(60)90105-0
Birman JL: Polarization of fluorescence in CdS and ZnS single crystals. Physical Review Letters 1959, 2: 157–159. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.157
Kim B, Kim H, Park S, Kyhm K, Cho C: Polarization asymmetry and optical modal gain saturation via carrier-photon interaction in ZnO. Applied Physics Letters 2010, 97: 041115. 10.1063/1.3473729
Hsu NE, Hung WK, Chen YF: Origin of defect emission identified by polarized luminescence from aligned ZnO nanorods. Journal of Applied Physics 2004, 96: 4671. 10.1063/1.1787905
Rigutti L, Tchernycheva M, De Luna Bugallo A, Jacopin G, Julien FH, Furtmayr F, Stutzmann M, Eickhoff M, Songmuang R, Fortuna F: Photoluminescence polarization properties of single GaN nanowires containing Al x Ga1- x N/GaN quantum discs. Physical Review B 2010, 81: 045411.
Chuang S, Chang C: k·p method for strained wurtzite semiconductors. Physical Review B 1996, 54: 2491–2504. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.2491
Ruda HE, Shik A: Polarization-sensitive optical phenomena in semiconducting and metallic nanowires. Physical Review B 2005, 72: 115308.
Chen HY, Yang YC, Lin HW, Chang SC, Gwo S: Polarized photoluminescence from single GaN nanorods: effects of optical confinement. Optics Express 2008, 16: 13465–13475. 10.1364/OE.16.013465
Chien CT, Wu MC, Chen CW, Yang HH, Wu JJ, Su WF, Lin CS, Chen YF: Polarization-dependent confocal Raman microscopy of an individual ZnO nanorod. Applied Physics Letters 2008, 92: 223102. 10.1063/1.2938701
Yang YR, Yan XH, Xiao Y, Guo ZH: The optical properties of one-dimensional ZnO: a first-principles study. Chemical Physics Letters 2007, 446: 98–102. 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.08.004
Cao G: Nanostructures & Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties & Applications. London: Imperial College Press; 2004.
Meyer BK, Alves H, Hofmann DM, Kriegsies W, Forster D, Bertram F, Christen J, Hoffmann A, Strassburg M, Dworzak M, Haboeck , Rodina AV: Bound exciton and donor-acceptor pair recombinations in ZnO. Physica Status Solidi (B) 2004, 241: 231–260. 10.1002/pssb.200301962
Meyer B, Sann J, Eisermann S, Lautenschlzeger S, Wagner M, Kaiser M, Callsen G, Reparaz J, Hoffman A: Excited state properties of donor bound excitons in ZnO. Physical Review B 2010, 82: 115207.
Grabowska J, Meaney A, Nanda K, Mosnier JP, Henry M, Duclère JR, McGlynn E: Surface excitonic emission and quenching effects in ZnO nanowire/nanowall systems: limiting effects on device potential. Physical Review B 2005, 71: 1–7.
Wischmeier L, Voss T, Rückmann I, Gutowski J, Mofor A, Bakin A, Waag A: Dynamics of surface-excitonic emission in ZnO nanowires. Physical Review B 2006, 74: 1–9.
Cao B, Cai W, Zeng H: Temperature-dependent shifts of three emission bands for ZnO nanoneedle arrays. Applied Physics Letters 2006, 88: 161101. 10.1063/1.2195694
This work was supported by the French ANR agency under the programs ANR-08-NANO-031 BoNaFo and ANR-08-BLAN-0179 NanoPhotoNit.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
GJ carried out the μ-PL measurements and data analysis, performed k·p analysis, and wrote the manuscript. LR and ADLB participated in the μ-PL measurements. LR, MT, and FHJ participated in the data analysis and to the interpretation of the results. CB and EC grew the sample. MF performed the TEM analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.