Skip to main content

Tuning the electronic transport properties of graphene through functionalisation with fluorine


We demonstrate the possibility to tune the electronic transport properties of graphene mono-layers and multi-layers by functionalisation with fluorine. For mono-layer samples, with increasing the fluorine content, we observe a transition from electronic transport through Mott variable range hopping (VRH) in two dimensions to Efros-Shklovskii VRH. Multi-layer fluorinated graphene with high concentration of fluorine show two-dimensional Mott VRH transport, whereas CF0.28 multi-layer flakes exhibit thermally activated transport through near neighbour hopping. Our experimental findings demonstrate that the ability to control the degree of functionalisation of graphene is instrumental to engineer different electronic properties in graphene materials.

1 Introduction

Graphene, a mono-layer of sp 2 bonded carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb pattern (Figure 1a), is a two-dimensional semi-metal where the valence and conduction bands touch in two independent points at the border of the Brillouin zone, named K and K' valleys [15]. This material has remarkable electronic, optical and mechanical properties which can be used in a new generation of devices [6, 7]. For instance, the high mobility of charge carriers is attracting considerable interest in the realm of high-speed electronics [8]. Furthermore, thanks to the unique combination of high electrical conductivity [4, 5] and optical transparency [9], graphene is a promising material for optoelectronic applications such as displays, photovoltaic cells and light-emitting diodes. Few-layer graphene are yet unique materials [10] with unprecedented physical properties: bilayers are semiconductors with a gate-tuneable band gap [1121], whereas trilayers are semi-metals with a gate-tuneable overlap between the conduction and valence bands [22, 23]. However, the use of graphene for applications in daily-life electronics suffers from a major drawback, i.e. the current in graphene cannot be simply pinched off by means of a gate voltage. A valuable solution to this problem is to engineer a band gap in the energy spectrum of graphene for example confining the physical dimensions of graphene into nanoribbons [2428] or by chemical functionalisation [2946].

Figure 1
figure 1

Fabrication of fluorinated graphene layers and transistor devices. Crystal structure of pristine graphene (a) and fluorinated graphene (b). The grey balls in (b) represent the carbon atoms, whereas the green balls are the fluorine atoms. Optical image of pristine graphene (c) and of fluorinated graphene (d). (e) False colour SEM image of a fluorinated graphene device. (f) Schematic view of the transistor structure fabricated on fluorinated graphene.

When chemical elements, e.g. oxygen, hydrogen or fluorine, are adsorbed on the surface of graphene, they form covalent bonds with the carbon atoms. As a result, the planar crystal structure of graphene characterised by sp 2 bonds between the carbon atoms is transformed into a three-dimensional structure with sp 3 bonds (see Figure 1b). The adsorbed elements can attach to graphene in a random way, as it is the case in graphene oxide [4446], or they can form ordered patterns as it has been found for hydrogen [3335] and fluorine [3643] adsorbates. Ab initio calculations performed within the density functional theory formalism predict that functionalisation with hydrogen and fluorine should lead, respectively, to a band gap of 3.8 and 4.2 eV for full functionalisation [2932].

Successful hydrogenation and fluorination of graphene have been recently achieved by several groups [3343]. Hydrogenation is usually carried out in a remote plasma of H2[3335] which makes it difficult to control the degree of induced atomic defects as well as the stoichiometry of the functionalisation. Furthermore, hydrogenated graphene can loose H at moderate temperatures [33], which limits the use of this material in applications where high-temperature stability is required. On the other hand, fluorine has higher binding energy to carbon and higher desorption energy than hydrogen [2932]. Opposed to hydrogenation, the process of fluorination is easy to control, e.g. via temperature and reactant gases, leading to reproducibly precise C/F stoichiometries.

Here, we explore the electronic transport properties of functionalised graphene with a fluorine content ranging from 7% (i.e. CF0.07 or F/C atomic ratio of 0.07) to 100% (CF1). We have fabricated transistor structures with fluorinated graphene mono-layers and multi-layers and studied their electrical transport properties in the temperature range from 4.2 to 300 K. We show that the electronic transport properties of fluorinated graphene can be tuned by adjusting the fluorine content, so that different transport regimes can be accessed, like Mott variable range hopping (VRH) in two dimensions [47, 48], Efros-Shklovskii VRH [49] and nearest neighbour hopping (NNH) transport.

2 Experimental details

Fluorinated graphene mono-layers and multi-layers were mechanically exfoliated from fluorinated graphite and deposited onto conventional Si/SiO2 (275 nm) substrates. The fluorinated graphite was synthesised via two routes: graphite fluorides (using F2 gas) and fluorine graphite intercalation compounds (FGIC) (using XeF2 as fluorinating agent), see Section 6. The samples produced using F2 gas that we investigate here are multi-layers and have the concentration of fluorine of 28 and 100%, whereas the samples synthesised using XeF2 gas are all mono-layers and have the fluorine content of 7, 24 and 28%.

Flakes of fluorinated graphene are located using an optical microscope (see Figure 1d) and subsequently characterised by Raman spectroscopy. Mono-layer graphene flakes were identified by fitting the 2D peak of the Raman spectra by a single Lorentzian function (see Figure 2b), with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 30-45 cm-1 which is typical for pristine mono-layer graphene [50]. The height of the studied multi-layer flakes is determined by Atomic Force Microscopy: 10-nm height for flakes exfoliated from the CF and 0.86-6.1 nm for flakes obtained from CF0.28. In total, four mono-layer, five CF and five CF0:28 multi-layer flakes were processed into four-terminal transistor devices, where the electrical contacts were defined by e-beam lithography, deposition of Cr/Au (5/50 nm) and lift-off procedure, see Figure 1e,f.

Figure 2
figure 2

Raman spectroscopy in fluorinated and pristine graphene. (a) Raman spectra of mono-layer fluorinated graphene with different fluorine content and pristine mono-layer graphene. (b) Fitting of the 2D peak with a single Lorentzian function for pristine and fluorinated mono-layer graphene. (c, d) Raman spectra of fluorinated multi-layer graphene.

The typical optical contrast of fluorinated graphene is ~2-6%, which is systematically lower than what we observe on pristine graphene (~9%), see Figure 1c,d. The reduced contrast in fluorinated graphene has to be expected, since the opening of a large energygap in the energy dispersion of fluorinated graphene lowers the optical absorption transitions between conduction and valence bands.

3 Raman spectroscopy

Figure 2 shows the Raman spectra of a mechanically exfoliated pristine graphene flake, with the G and 2D (also known as G') bands at 1580 and 2700 cm-1. The G band is associated with the double degenerate E2g phonon mode at the Brillouin zone center, while the 2D mode originates from a second-order process, involving two intervalley phonons near the K point, without the presence of any kind of disorder or defect [50]. In the fluorinated graphene, additional peaks are activated in the Raman spectra (see Figure 2), the D and D' peaks that appear at 1350 and 1620 cm-1. These Raman peaks originate from double-resonance processes at the K point in the presence of defects, involving, respectively, intervalley (D) and intravalley (D') phonons [5154].

In exfoliated pristine graphene, the D peak can only be observed at the edges of the flakes where there is a large concentration of structural defects and its intensity is typically much lower than the intensity of the G peak [55, 56]. In our studies performed on pristine graphene flakes with similar size as the fluorinated graphene flakes, the intensity of the D peak is typically well below the sensitivity of our Raman setup, i.e. we are usually not able to detect any D peak because of the edges of the flakes. Therefore, the observed D peak in our fluorinated graphene samples must originate from other defects than simply the edges of the samples. As all our samples contain networks of sp 2 bonded carbon atom rings, we believe that the D peak is mainly activated by the F atoms which act as vacancies in these sp 2 rings.

A better understanding of the level of disorder in our samples is reached when analysing the intensity ratio ID/IG for the D and G bands. It has recently been shown that in graphene ID/IG has a non-monotonic dependence on the average distance between defects LD, increasing with increasing LD up to LD ~ 4 nm and decreasing for LD > 4 nm [53, 54, 57]. Such behavior has been explained by the existence of two disorder-induced regions contributing to the D peak: a structurally disordered region of a radius ~1 nm around the defect and a larger defect-activated region which extends to ~3 nm around the defect. In the defect-activated region, the lattice structure is preserved, but the proximity to a defect causes a mixing of Bloch states near the K and K' valleys. Consequently, the breaking of the selection rules leads to an enhancement of the D peak. Furthermore, it was shown that in the structurally disordered region, the G and D' peaks overlap.

The Raman spectra of fluorinated mono-layer samples produced from graphite with fluorine content of 7 and 28% (see Figure 2a) systematically show that the G and D' peaks have a significant overlap. On the other hand, the samples exfoliated from CF0.24 exhibit very distinct G and D' peaks. Based on the aforementioned phenomenological model [53, 54, 57], we can state that the CF0.07 and CF0.28 samples are in the regime where the intensity ratio ID/IG increases with increasing LD (i.e. decreasing the concentration of F) whereas the CF0.24 samples are in the opposite regime. This scenario is confirmed when comparing the intensity ratio ID/IG for fluorinated mono-layers extracted from graphite with different fluorine content: ID/IG = 1.74 for CF0:28 and ID/IG = 2.16 for CF0.07. From the LD dependence on ID/IG we estimate LD ~ 1.5 nm for CF0.28 and LD ~2 nm for CF0.07[53, 54, 57]. For the CF0.24 samples, we estimate LD ~ 5.3 nm for device 1 and LD ~ 6.1 nm for device 2. These values of LD are in agreement with the observed frequencies of the D, G, D' and 2D peaks as well as with the FWHM values of the 2D peaks [53].

In the case of the fluorinated multi-layer flakes, see Figure 2c,d, it is difficult to perform a similar analysis, as the intensity of the G band depends on the number of graphene layers present in the sample [50]. For samples thicker than three to four layers, the structure of the 2D peak does not provide an accurate estimation for the number of layers because of the large number of fitting parameters.

4 Electrical transport measurements

Having characterised the level of disorder from Raman spectroscopy, we now proceed to address the role of disorder on the electrical transport properties of fluorinated graphene materials. Figure 3 shows the resistivity (ρ) as a function of gate voltage (V g) for the fluorinated mono-layer samples for different temperatures. The resistivity exhibits a non-monotonous dependence on V g with a maximum at V g = +10 V, stemming for a doping level of n = 0.74 1012 cm-2 commonly seen also in pristine graphene devices and attributed to doping by atmospheric water. In all cases, the resistivity of fluorinated graphene shows a pronounced temperature dependence. Indeed, the maximum of resistivity changes over two orders of magnitude as T decreases from 300 to 4.2 K. Away from the maximum of resistivity region, the temperature dependence remains weak, with the mobility of carriers of 150 cm2/Vs. Furthermore, at low temperature the resistance shows strong mesoscopic fluctuations, as expected for samples of small size [58]. In the analysis of the maximum of resistivity, we smooth the ρ(V g) curves using a moving average filter.

Figure 3
figure 3

Electronic transport in fluorinated mono-layer graphene. Resitivity of four fluorinated mono-layer graphene samples as a function of gate voltage at different temperatures. The different panels correspond to different concentration of fluorine in the starting fluorinated graphite material, as indicated in each panel.

To examine the presence of the energy gap, we analyse the temperature dependence of the maximum of resistivity by an exponential law describing thermal activation of carriers across an energy gap Δε: ρ(T) = ρ 0 exp(Δε/ 2k BT), see Figure 4a. This analysis clearly shows that our data are not described by the thermal activation law over the whole temperature range. We note that the slope of lnρ (1/T) versus 1/T decreases with decreasing T, which is a signature of hopping conduction via localised states [48]. The fact that in the whole range of studied temperatures electron transport is not due to thermal activation across the gap but due to hopping becomes clear when re-analysing the temperature dependence in terms of the 2D Mott VRH (2D-VRH) [47, 48]. In this model, the functional dependence of ρ on temperature is ρ(T) = ρ 0 exp(T 0/T)1/3, where k B T 0 = 13.6/a 2 g(ε F ), g is the density of localised states at the Fermi level ε F and a is the localisation length [47, 48]. Experimentally we find that the measured ρ(T) for the samples produced from CF0.07 and CF0.24 graphite (see Figure 3b for CF0.24) is described well by the 2D-VRH model.

Figure 4
figure 4

VRH transport in fluorinated mono-layer graphene. Resistivity of fluorinated mono-layer graphene in the charge neutrality region plotted as a function of T -1 (a) and T-1/3 (b). (c) The values of the hopping parameter T 0 as a function of carrier density for the samples where transport occurs by two-dimensional Mott VRH. (d) Schematic diagrams of the energy dispersion of fluorinated mono-layer graphene (left panel) and of the energy dependence of the density of electron states, with the Fermi level at zero energy (right panel). The localised states are shown by the shaded area. (e) Resistivity of fluorinated mono-layer graphene (exfoliated from CF0.28 graphite) in the charge neutrality region plotted as a function of T-x. The solid lines represent fits to the experimental data where x = 1 for thermally activated transport, x = 1/2 for Efros-Shklovskii VRH and x = 1/3 for 2D Mott VRH. The best t is obtained for x = 1/2.

Figure 4c shows the hopping parameter T 0 as a function of carrier concentration for these three samples. The value of T 0 approaches zero at a carrier concentration of ±1.2 1012 cm-2. This value gives the concentration of the localised electron states in the energy range from ε = 0 to the mobility edge, see Figure 4d. The mobility edge occurs at V g ± 20V and indicates the transition from hopping to metallic conduction.

In order to relate the obtained concentration of the localised states to the energy gap Δε, one needs to know the exact energy dependence of the density of states in the gap. For estimations, we will use the linear relation for the density of extended states above the mobility edge g(ε) = 2ε/πħ 2 v 2 (v = 106 m/s is the Fermi velocity), and a constant value for the density of localised states below the mobility edge, Figure 4d. This gives Δε = 60 meV and twice this value for the full mobility gap. In this approximation, the density of the localised states in the gap is ~1036 J/m2. Using the obtained value of the hopping parameter at the maximum of resistivity, we can then estimate the localisation length at ε = 0 as a = 40 nm for CF0.24 (device 1), a = 81 nm for CF0.24 (device 2) and a = 265 nm for CF0.07.

Figure 4e shows the analysis of the temperature dependence of the resistivity for fluorinated mono-layer graphene exfoliated from CF0.28 graphite. For this sample, characterised by the largest disorder LD ~1.5 nm, the experimental data cannot be described by thermally activated law nor Mott VRH. In this case, the ln(ρ) follows a T -1/2 dependence characteristic of the Efros-Shklovskii VRH in the presence of Coulomb interaction between the localised states (ρ(T) = ρ 0 exp(T 0/T)1/2) [49]. T 0 is related to the localisation lengths through T 0 = 2.8e2 / 4 πε r ε 0 k B a and for our sample we estimate T 0 = 52 K. Assuming that ε r is the dielectric constant of SiO2 we obtain the localisation length a = 282 nm.

We turn now our discussion to multi-layer fluorinated graphene exfoliated from fully fluorinated graphite and from CF0.28 prepared by exposure to fluorine gas. The fully fluorinated multi-layer show systematically a very large resistance (more than 100 GΩ) independently of the specific thickness and no gate-voltage control of the resistivity. To achieve gate modulation in these samples, we reduced the fluorine content by annealing the samples at 300°C, in a 10 % atmosphere of H2/Ar for 2 h. This annealing process restores a partial gate-voltage control of the resistance (Figure 5a) while leaving unchanged the Raman spectrum in Figure 2d.

Figure 5
figure 5

Electronic transport in fluorinated multi-layer graphene. (a) Resistivity as a function of gate voltage for an annealed fully fluorinated device. (a) Resistivity for the fully fluorinated device plotted against T -1 and T -1/3 at V g = +50 V. (c) I-V characteristics for multi-layer fluorinated graphene exfoliated from CF0.28 graphite. (d) Resistivity of fluorinated multi-layer graphene (exfoliated from CF0.28) plotted as a function of T -x, where x = 1 for thermally activated transport, x = 1/2 for Efros-Shklovskii VRH and x = 1/3 for 2D Mott VRH.

Resistance measurements of CF n flakes after annealing show a strong temperature dependence, Figure 5a. Analysis of the temperature dependence of the resistance in terms of the activation law at the highest gate voltage V g = 50 V (which is still far from the Dirac point) gives a gap of only 25 meV, which is significantly smaller than the expected energy gap for fully fluorinated graphene. Similarly to the fluorinated mono-layer graphene, the resistivity dependence on temperature is fitted well by VRH with the value of T 0 = 20000 K. This confirms that the previously found activation energy of 25 meV is not the activation energy Δε that separates the localised states from extended states at the mobility edge, but is an activation energy δε of hopping between localised states within the mobility gap, see Figure 4d.

Figure 5c,d shows the transport data for the multi-layer fluorinated graphene CF0.28 prepared by exposure to fluorine gas. The I-V characteristics of these samples are strongly non-linear (see Figure 5c) with resistances of more than 1 GΩ. In this case, the dependence of the resistivity on temperature cannot be described neither by 2D-VRH nor by Efros-Shklovskii VRH (see Figure 5d). The ln(ρ)(T) dependence is rather well described by a thermally activated law at elevated temperatures (regime A), with a Δε = 0.25 eV, followed by a temperature regime where the resistivity decreases with lowering the temperature (regime B). A 1/T dependence of ln(ρ) could be the consequence of either intrinsic transport through thermally excited carriers above the bandgap or conduction through NNH via localised states within the gap. Since the I-V characteristics of our devices show a non-linearity on a V sd range much larger than the estimated Δε = 0.25 eV (see Figure 5c), we conclude that transport occurs via NNH.

Finally, for the same degree of fluorination (i.e. CF0.28) the graphene multi-layers exhibit a stronger temperature dependence and a larger transport gap than what is observed in mono-layers. This difference could originate from the different fluorination processes used for the multi-layers (direct fluorination with F2 gas at high temperature to produce graphite fluorides) and for the monolayers (FGIC synthesised at lower temperatures), see Section 6. Indeed, different fluorination processes may lead to different concentrations of localised states. Even though in both materials, F-GIC and graphite fluorides, the nature of the bonding between fluorine and carbon atoms is covalent, the C-F bond order is slightly lower in F-GIC [59]. The lower C-F bond order in F-GIC is due to the hyper-conjugation which occurs between the C-F and the C-C single bonds around the C-F bonds. In particular, the C-F and C-C single bond lengths are, respectively, longer and shorter in F-GIC than those in graphite fluorides. As a result, the electrons involved in the covalent C-F bonds in F-GIC are slightly delocalised by this hyperconjugation, which may result in a smaller transport gap.

5 Conclusions

In conclusion, we have demonstrated the possibility to tune the band structure and therefore the electronic transport properties of graphene through functionalisation with fluorine. In particular, depending on the fluorine concentration different transport regimes can be accessed. For mono-layer samples, we observe a transition from 2D Mott VRH to Efros-Shklovskii VRH with increasing the fluorine content. Multi-layer fluorinated graphene with high concentration of fluorine shows 2D Mott VRH, whereas CF0:28 multi-layer flakes exhibit NNH transport. Our experimental findings demonstrate that the ability to control the degree of functionalisation of graphene is instrumental to engineer different electronic properties in graphene materials. In all cases, fluorinated graphene transistors exhibit a large on/off ratio of the current, making this material of interest for future applications in transparent and bendable electronics.

6 Methods

6.1 Fluorination of graphite

To produce fluorinated graphite, we have used two distinct methods [5962]. In the first method, graphite is heated in the presence of F2 to temperatures in excess of 300°C, so that covalent C-F bonds are formed and modify the carbon hybridisation [60]. The layered structure of graphite is then transformed into a 3D arrangement of carbon atoms (Figure 1a,b). In this article, we present the studies on graphene exfoliated from fully fluorinated HOPG graphite CF n (obtained at 600°C) and CF0.28 synthesised with this method at 530°C. However, due to the harsh fluorination conditions, many structural defects are formed, which makes it very difficult to exfoliate large enough mono-layer flakes that can be identified by optical microscopy and easily processed into devices. To prepare larger fluorinated graphene samples, we have used a second fluorination method where graphite is exposed to a fluorinating agent, i.e. XeF2. In this case, the functionalisation process is carried out at T ≤ 120°C, as XeF2 easily decomposes on the graphite surface into atomic fluorine [59]. The mixture of natural graphite and XeF2 was prepared in a glove box in an Ar atmosphere. Owing to its reactivity and diffusion, the fluorination results in a homogenous dispersion of fluorine atoms that become covalently bonded to carbon atoms [59, 62, 63]. At low fluorine content, the F/C atomic ratio is ≤ 0.4. In this case, the conjugated C-C double bonds in the non-fluorinated parts and covalent C-F bonds in corrugated fluorocarbon regions coexist [62, 64]. The concentration of the covalent bonds increases with increasing the concentration of fluorine. The samples produced using the XeF2 gas that we investigate here have the concentration of fluorine of 7, 24 and 28%.

6.2 Determination of fluorine concentration

The fluorine concentration (i.e. F:C molar ratio) of fluorinated graphite was determined by gravimetry (weight uptake). The concentration obtained by weight uptake was confirmed by solid-state NMR measurements on samples fabricated under identical conditions and the accuracy of gravimetry was estimated to be 0.02 [6567]. The fluorine concentration measured by gravimetry can be under-estimated due to the decomposition of graphite under fluorine gas at high temperature, which results in the formation of carbene (CF2) and C2F4. However, the decomposition of graphite was found to start as a secondary reaction close to 600°C, with fluorination being the main reaction. Since the reactions with F2 and XeF2 have been carried at lower temperatures than the graphite decomposition temperature, the underestimation of F:C ratio in our fluorinated graphite samples is likely to be less than 0.02.

6.3 Raman spectroscopy characterisation

We have characterised all the exfoliated flakes by Raman spectroscopy using an excitation light with a wavelength of 532 nm and a spot size of 1.5 μ m in diameter. An incident power of 5 mW was used. We ensured that this power does not damage the graphene by performing Raman measurements on a similarly sized pristine graphene flake which shows the common spectra of mechanically exfoliated graphene: the G band and 2D band (also known as G') at 1580 and 2700 cm-1, see Figure 2.

6.4 Electrical characterisation

The resistance of the transistor devices was measured both in dc, by means of Keithley 2400 Source-meter, and in ac at low frequency (34 Hz) with a lock-in amplifier in a voltage-biased configuration. For the ac-measurements, the excitation current was varied to ensure that the resulting voltage was smaller than the temperature to prevent heating of the electrons and the occurrence of nonequilibrium effects. The comparison of 2- and 4-probe measurements shows that the contact resistance in our devices is negligible as compared to the sample resistance. This experimental finding insures that even 2-probe transport measurements are probing the electrical properties of the bulk fluorinated graphene rather then simply the Cr/graphene interface.



two-dimensional Mott variable range hopping


atomic force microscopy


fluorine graphite intercalation compounds


full width at half maximum


nuclear magnetic resonance


nearest neighbour hopping


variable range hopping.


  1. Wallace PR: The band theory of graphite. Phys Rev 1947, 71: 622–634. 10.1103/PhysRev.71.622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Castro Neto AH, Guinea F, Peres NMR, Novoselov KS, Geim AK: The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 2009, 81: 109–162. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA: Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306: 666–669. 10.1126/science.1102896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Katsnelson MI, Grigorieva IV, Dubonos SV, Firsov AA: Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 2005, 438: 197–200. 10.1038/nature04233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang YB, Tan YW, Stormer HL, Kim P: Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. Nature 2005, 438: 201–204. 10.1038/nature04235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Geim AK, Novoselov KS: The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 2007, 6: 183–191. 10.1038/nmat1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geim AK: Graphene: status and prospects. Science 2009, 324: 1530–1534. 10.1126/science.1158877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morozov SV, Novoselov KS, Katsnelson MI, Schedin F, Elias DC, Jaszczak JA, Geim AK: Giant intrinsic carrier mobilities in graphene and its bilayer. Phys Rev Lett 2008, 100: 016602–016606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nair RR, Blake P, Grigorenko AN, Novoselov KS, Booth TJ, Stauber T, Peres NMR, Geim AK: Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 2008, 320: 1308. 10.1126/science.1156965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Craciun MF, Russo S, Yamamoto M, Tarucha S: Tuneable electronic properties in graphene. Nano Today 2011, 6: 42–60. 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohta T, Bostowick A, Seyller T, Horn K, Rotenberg E: Controlling the electronic structure of bilayer graphene. Science 2006, 313: 951–954. 10.1126/science.1130681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Castro EV, Novoselov KS, Morozov SV, Peres NMR, Lopes dos Santos JMB, Nilsson J, Guinea F, Geim AK, Castro Neto AH: Biased bilayer graphene: semiconductor with a gap tunable by the electric field effect. Phys Rev Lett 2007, 99: 216802–216806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oostinga JB, Heersche HB, Liu X, Morpurgo AF, Vandersypen LMK: Gate-induced insulating state in bilayer graphene devices. Nat Mater 2008, 7: 151–157. 10.1038/nmat2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang LM, Li ZQ, Basov DN, Fogler MM, Hao Z, Martin MC: Determination of the electronic structure of bilayer graphene from infrared spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 2008, 78: 235408–235419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou SY, Siegel DA, Fedorov AV, Lanzara A: Metal to insulator transition in epitaxial graphene induced by molecular doping. Phys Rev Lett 2008, 101: 086402–086406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang YB, Tang TT, Girit C, Hao Z, Martin MC, Zettl A, Crommie MF, Shen YR, Wang F: Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene. Nature 2009, 459: 820–823. 10.1038/nature08105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mak KF, Lui CH, Shan J, Heinz TF: Observation of an electric-field-induced band gap in bilayer graphene by infrared spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 2009, 102: 256405–256409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuzmenko AB, Crassee I, van der Marel D, Blake P, Novoselov KS: Determination of the gate-tunable band gap and tight-binding parameters in bilayer graphene using infrared spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 2009, 80: 165406–165418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Russo S, Craciun MF, Yamamoto M, Tarucha S, Morpurgo AF: Double-gated graphene-based devices. New J Phys 2009, 11: 095018–095029. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/9/095018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xia F, Farmer DB, Lin Y, Avouris P: Graphene field-effect transistors with high on/off current ratio and large transport band gap at room temperature. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 715–718. 10.1021/nl9039636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zou K, Zhu J: Transport in gapped bilayer graphene: the role of potential fluctuations. Phys Rev B 2010, 82: 081407–081411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Craciun MF, Russo S, Yamamoto M, Oostinga JB, Morpurgo AF, Tarucha S: Trilayer graphene is a semimetal with a gate-tunable band overlap. Nat Nanotechnol 2009, 4: 383–388. 10.1038/nnano.2009.89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Koshino M, McCann E: Gate-induced interlayer asymmetry in ABA-stacked trilayer graphene. Phys Rev B 2009, 79: 125443–125448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Son YW, Cohen ML, Louie SG: Energy gaps in graphene nanoribbons. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97: 216803–216807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Han MY, Ozyilmaz B, Zhang YB, Kim P: Energy band-gap engineering of graphene nanoribbons. Phys Rev Lett 2007, 98: 206805–206809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li XL, Wang XR, Zhang L, Lee SW, Dai HJ: Chemically derived, ultrasmooth graphene nanoribbon semiconductors. Science 2008, 319: 1229–1232. 10.1126/science.1150878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiao LY, Zhang L, Wang XR, Diankov G, Dai H: Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes. Nature 2009, 458: 877–880. 10.1038/nature07919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Oostinga JB, Sacepe B, Craciun MF, Morpurgo AF: Magnetotransport through graphene nanoribbons. Phys Rev B 2010, 81: 193408–193412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sofo OJ, Chaudhari AS, Barber GD: Graphane: A two-dimensional hydrocarbon. Phys Rev B 2007, 75: 153401–153405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Boukhvalov DW, Katsnelson MI: Chemical functionalization of graphene. J Phys Condens Matter 2009, 21: 344205–344217. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/34/344205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leenaerts O, Peelaers H, Hernandez-Nieves AD, Partoens B, Peeters FM: First-principles investigation of graphene fluoride and graphane. Phys Rev B 2010, 82: 195436–195442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sahin H, Topsakal M, Ciraci S: Structures of fluorinated graphene and their signatures. Phys Rev B 2011, 83: 115432–115438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Elias DC, Nair RR, Mohiuddin TMG, Morozov SV, Blake P, Halsall MP, Ferrari AC, Boukhvalov DW, Katsnelson MI, Geim AK, Novoselov KS: Control of graphene's properties by reversible hydrogenation: evidence for graphane. Science 2009, 323: 610–613. 10.1126/science.1167130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Han Y, Maultzsch J, Heinz TF, Kim P, Steigerwald ML, Brus LE: Reversible basal plane hydrogenation of graphene. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 4597–4602. 10.1021/nl802940s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Balog R, Jorgensen B, Nilsson L, Andersen M, Rienks E, Bianchi M, Fanetti M, Lagsgaard E, Baraldi A, Lizzit S, Sljivancanin Z, Besenbacher F, Hammer B, Pedersen TG, Hofmann P, Hornekar L: Bandgap opening in graphene induced by patterned hydrogen adsorption. Nat Mater 2010, 9: 315–319. 10.1038/nmat2710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Worsley KA, Ramesh P, Mandal SK, Niyogi S, Itkis ME, Haddon RC: Soluble graphene derived from graphite fluoride. Chem Phys Lett 2007, 445: 51–56. 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.07.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bon SB, Valentini L, Verdejo R, Garcia Fierro JL, Peponi L, Lopez-Manchado MA, Kenny JM: Plasma fluorination of chemically derived graphene sheets and subsequent modification with butylamine. Chem Mater 2009, 21: 3433–3438. 10.1021/cm901039j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Withers F, Dubois M, Savchenko AK: Electron properties of fluorinated single-layer graphene transistors. Phys Rev B 2010, 82: 073403–073407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nair RR, Ren W, Jalil R, Riaz I, Kravets VG, Britnell L, Blake P, Schedin F, Mayorov AS, Yuan S, Katsnelson MI, Cheng HM, Strupinski W, Bulusheva LG, Okotrub AV, Grigorieva IV, Grigorenko AN, Novoselov KS, Geim AK: Fluorographene: a two-dimensional counterpart of teflon. Small 2010, 6: 2877–2884. 10.1002/smll.201001555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Robinson JT, Burgess JS, Junkermeier CE, Badescu SC, Reinecke TL, Perkins FK, Zalalutdniov MK, Baldwin JW, Culbertson JC, Sheehan PE, Snow ES: Properties of fluorinated graphene films. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 3001–3005. 10.1021/nl101437p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cheng SH, Zou K, Okino F, Gutierrez HR, Gupta A, Shen N, Eklund PC, Sofo JO, Zhu J: Reversible fluorination of graphene: evidence of a two-dimensional wide bandgap semiconductor. Phys Rev B 2010, 81: 205435–205440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jeon KJ, Lee Z, Pollak E, Moreschini L, Bostwick A, Park CM, Mendelsberg R, Radmilovic V, Kostecki R, Richardson TJ, Rotenberg E: Fluorographene: a wide bandgap semiconductor with ultraviolet luminescence. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 1042–1046. 10.1021/nn1025274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hong X, Cheng SH, Herding C, Zhu J: Colossal negative magnetoresistance in dilute fluorinated graphene. Phys Rev B 2011, 83: 085410–085415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dikin DA, Stankovich S, Zimney EJ, Piner RD, Dommett GHB, Evmenenko G, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS: Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature 2007, 448: 457–460. 10.1038/nature06016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Park S, Ruoff RS: Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol 2009, 4: 217–224. 10.1038/nnano.2009.58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Eda G, Chhowalla M: Chemically derived graphene oxide: towards large-area thin-film electronics and optoelectronics. Adv Mater 2010, 22: 2392–2415. 10.1002/adma.200903689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mott NF: Conduction in non-crystalline materials III. Localized states in a pseudogap and near extremities of conduction and valence bands. Philos Mag 1969, 19: 835–852. 10.1080/14786436908216338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shklovskii BI, Efros AL: Electronic Properties of Doped Semiconductors. Springer Series in Solid State Sciences, vol 45. Berlin: Springer; 1984.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Efros AL, Shklovskii BI: Electron-Electron Interactions in Disordered Systems. Volume 409. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V, Casiraghi C, Lazzeri M, Mauri F, Piscanec S, Jiang D, Novoselov KS, Roth S, Geim AK: Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97: 187401–187405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dresselhaus MS, Jorio A, Hofmann M, Dresselhaus G, Saito R: Perspectives on carbon nanotubes and graphene raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 751–758. 10.1021/nl904286r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pimenta MA, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS, Cancado LG, Jorio A, Saito R: Studying disorder in graphite-based systems by Raman spectroscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2007, 9: 1276–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Martins Ferreira EH, Moutinho MVO, Stavale F, Lucchese MM, Capaz RB, Achete CA, Jorio A: Evolution of the Raman spectra from single-, few-, and many-layer graphene with increasing disorder. Phys Rev B 2010, 82: 125429–125438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lucchese MM, Stavale F, Martins Ferreira EH, Vilania C, Moutinho MVO, Capaz RB, Achete CA, Jorio A: Quantifying ion-induced defects and Raman relaxation length in graphene. Carbon 2010, 48: 1592–1597. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Casiraghi C, Hartschuh A, Qian H, Piscane S, Georgi C, Fasoli A, Novoselov KS, Basko DM, Ferrari AC: Raman spectroscopy of graphene edges. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 1433–1441. 10.1021/nl8032697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Malard LM, Pimenta MA, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS: Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys Rep 2009, 473: 51–87. 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Cancado LG, Jorio A, Martins Ferreira EH, Stavale F, Achete CA, Capaz RB, Moutinho MVO, Lombardo A, Kulmala T, Ferrari AC: Quantifying defects in graphene via Raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. arXiv:1105.0175 arXiv:1105.0175

  58. Kechedzhi K, Horsell DW, Tikhonenko FV, Savchenko AK, Gorbachev RV, Lerner IV, Falko VI: Quantum transport thermometry for electrons in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 2009, 102: 066801–066805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sato Y, Itoh K, Hagiwara R, Fukunaga T, Ito Y: On the so-called "semi-ionic" C-F bond character in fluorine-GIC. Carbon 2004, 42: 3243–3249. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Nakajima T: Synthesis, structure and physicochemical properties of fluorine-graphite intercalation compounds. In Fluorine-Carbon and Fluoride-Carbon Materials. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1995:1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Touhara K, Okino K: Property control of carbon materials by fluorination. Carbon 2000, 38: 241–267. 10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00140-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang W, Spinelle L, Dubois M, Guerin K, Kharbache H, Masin F, Kharitonov AP, Hamwi A, Brunet J, Varenne C, Pauly A, Thomas P, Himmel D, Mansot JL: New synthesis methods for fluorinated carbon nanofibres and applications. J Fluorine Chem 2010, 131: 676–683. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2010.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhanga W, Guerina K, Dubois M, Fawalb ZE, Ivanovc DA, Vidalc L, Hamwia A: Carbon nanofibres fluorinated using TbF4 as fluorinating agent. Part I: structural properties. Carbon 2008, 46: 1010–1016. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.02.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Giraudet J, Dubois M, Guerin K, Delabarre C, Hamwi A, Masin F: Solid-state NMR study of the post-fluorination of (C2.5F)n fluorine-GIC. J Phys Chem B 2007, 111: 14143–14151. 10.1021/jp076170g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chamssedine F, Dubois M, Guerin K, Giraudet J, Masin F, Ivanov DA, Vidal L, Yazami R, Hamwi A: Reactivity of carbon nanofibers with fluorine gas. Chem Mater 2007, 19: 161–172. 10.1021/cm061731m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Dubois M, Giraudet J, Guerin K, Hamwi A, Fawal Z, Pirotte P, Masin F: EPR and solid-state NMR studies of poly(dicarbon monofluoride) (C2F)n. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110: 11800–11808. 10.1021/jp061291m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang W, Dubois M, Guerin K, Bonnet P, Kharbache H, Masin F, Kharitonovd AP, Hamwi A: Effect of curvature on C-F bonding in fluorinated carbons: from fullerene and derivatives to graphite. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010, 12: 1388–1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge T.H. Bointon for performing the AFM measurements on the multi-layer graphene. SR and MFC acknowledge the financial support from the EPSRC (Grant nos. EP/G036101/1 and EP/J000396/1). SR acknowledges the financial support from the Royal Society Research Grant 2010/R2 (Grant no. SH-05052).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica F Craciun.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

FW fabricated the fluorinated graphene devices and carried out the measurements. MD synthesised the fluorinated graphite. FW and MFC performed the data analysis. FW, SR and MFC wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results, read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Withers, F., Russo, S., Dubois, M. et al. Tuning the electronic transport properties of graphene through functionalisation with fluorine. Nanoscale Res Lett 6, 526 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Fluorine
  • Fluorine Content
  • Electronic Transport Property
  • Pristine Graphene
  • XeF2