Skip to main content

A high-performance quantum dot superluminescent diode with a two-section structure


Based on InAs/GaAs quantum dots [QDs], a high-power and broadband superluminescent diode [SLD] is achieved by monolithically integrating a conventional SLD with a semiconductor optical amplifier. The two-section QD-SLD device exhibits a high output power above 500 mW with a broad emission spectrum of 86 nm. By properly controlling the current injection in the two sections of the QD-SLD device, the output power of the SLD can be tuned over a wide range from 200 to 500 mW while preserving a broad emission spectrum based on the balance between the ground state emission and the first excited state emission of QDs. The gain process of the two-section QD-SLD with different pumping levels in the two sections is investigated.


Superluminescent diodes [SLDs] have attracted extensive attention for a wide range of applications, such as optical coherence tomography [OCT] [1, 2], optical fiber-based sensors [35], external cavity tunable lasers [68], optoelectronic systems [9], etc. A wide emission spectrum corresponding to a low degree of coherence is required for these applications of SLD, which allows the realization of sensors with improved resolution. It has been proposed that self-assembled quantum dots [QDs] [1012] and quantum well grown on a high-index surface are beneficial to broaden the spectral bandwidth of the device [13]. Till now, QDs have successfully been used as the active media in several broadband light-emitting devices, such as QD-SLDs [1420], QD semiconductor optical amplifiers [SOAs] [2123], and QD broadband laser diodes [2426]. For QD-SLD devices, a high power of 200 mW [14] and a wide spectral bandwidth of more than 140 nm [27, 28] have been achieved. Most recently, an intermixed QD-SLD exhibits a power of 190 mW with a 78-nm spectral bandwidth [29].

For a typical SLD device structure with a single current-injection section, the high output power can only be obtained at a high pumping level, where the device demonstrates a narrow spectrum emitted predominantly from the QDs' excited state [ES] due to the low saturated gain of the QD ground state [GS]. It is difficult to achieve high-power and broad-emitting spectrum simultaneity. However, a high-power SLD that is broadband emitting is required in some fields. As an example, in an OCT system, a high power is usually needed to enable greater penetration depth and improve the imaging sensitivity [30]. Numerical investigation [31] and experimental evidence [32, 33] have shown that this limitation can be overcome by using a multi-section structure in an SLD device, which allows the emission spectrum and output power to be tuned independently. A quantum-well SLD with a two-section structure which integrates monolithically an SLD with an SOA has been reported, which exhibits an output power that is one or two orders of magnitude higher than that in conventional SLD devices [34].

In this paper, a QD-SLD device, which has a two-section structure monolithically integrating an SLD with an SOA, is fabricated. A high power (500 mW) with a broad emission of 86 nm is obtained. By properly controlling the current injection in the two sections of the QD-SLD device, the power tunability over a wide range from 200 to 500 mW is achieved, with the preservation of a nearly constant spectral width.


The epitaxial structure of the QD-SLD device in this study was grown by a Riber 32P solid-source molecular beam epitaxy machine on n-GaAs(001) substrate. The epitaxial structure consists of ten InAs-QD layers separated from each other by a GaAs spacer; each of them is formed by depositing a 1.8-monolayer InAs at 480°C and covered by a 2-nm In0.15Ga0.85As. Ten QD layers plus the GaAs waveguide layers form the whole active region which is sandwiched between 1.5-μm n- and p-type Al0.5Ga0.5As cladding layers. Finally, a p+-doped GaAs contact layer completes the structure.

A QD-SLD device with an index-guided ridge waveguide and a two-section structure was fabricated. A schematic diagram of the geometrical design (not to scale) is shown in Figure 1. The device integrates monolithically an SLD with a tapered SOA. The SLD section is 1-mm long and 10-μm wide. The tapered SOA section is 3-mm long with a full flare angle of 6°. The ridge waveguide was fabricated using photolithography and wet chemical etching. The center axis of the ridge is aligned at 6° with respect to the facet normal to suppress lasing. A 200-μm-length output window structure (no electric contact) is used to reduce the risk for catastrophic optical damage of the output facet with a high output power. Ti/Au and AuGeNi/Au ohmic contacts were evaporated on the top and back of the wafer, respectively. A 20-μm-wide separation between the SLD and the SOA sections is realized by removing the upper Ti/Au ohmic contact and the 0.5-μm epilayer using photolithography and wet chemical etching. After metallization, the device was cleaved and mounted p-side up on a copper sink using an indium solder. Antireflection coatings of λ/4 were used on both facets of the device. The QD-SLD device was characterized by light power-injection current [P-I] and electroluminescence measurements at room temperature under a pulsing (1 kHz repetition rate and 3% duty cycle) injection in the SOA section and a continuous-wave injection in the SLD section, respectively.

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of the QD-SLD device with a two-section structure.

Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows the P-I characteristic of the SOA section with the SLD section un-pumped and acting as a rear optical absorption region. A superluminescent characteristic is clearly observed by the superlinear increase in optical power with the current. At a current of 9.8 A, a maximum output power of 280 mW is obtained. The emission spectra under different injection currents in the SOA section [I SOA] are shown in the inset of Figure 2. When I SOA = 2 A, the center wavelength of the emission spectrum is 1.18 μm with a full width at half maximum of 43 nm, which corresponds to the QDs' GS emission. The relatively wide GS emission is attributed to the size inhomogeneity that is naturally occurring in self-assembled QDs. With the increasing I SOA, the emission spectra are clearly broadened to the short-wavelength side, which should be attributed to the sequential carrier filling into the first ES [ES1]. For a given I SOA of 8.35 A, due to the nearly identical contribution to the emission from the QDs' GS and ES1, a 94-nm broad spectrum with a power of 200 mW is achieved.

Figure 2
figure 2

P - I characteristic of the SOA section with the SLD section un-pumped. The inset shows the normalized emission spectra under different injection currents of the SOA section.

The characteristics of the two-section SLD device were measured when the SLD section was pumped to seed the SOA section. The output-power characteristics versus I SOA under different SLD section currents [I SLD] are shown in Figure 3. It can be seen from the figure that the output power increases rapidly with the increasing current injection in the SLD section. Without pumping the SLD section, the output power of the device is 280 mW at I SOA = 9.8 A. The output power can reach 1.15 W at I SOA = 9.8 A and I SLD = 400 mA. The device begins lasing when the power is in the range of 500 to approximately 600 mW with various SOA and SLD current combinations (refer to Figure 4). The evident increase of output power is attributed to the amplification of the input beam while propagating forward from the narrow end to the wide end of the tapered region. With a full flare angle of 6°, the incident beam will expand freely to fill the full tapered region owing to diffraction [35]. The optical density will be reduced, which increases the saturated power.

Figure 3
figure 3

Output power versus SOA current under different injection currents of the SLD section.

Figure 4
figure 4

Equal power curves (solid lines) as function of the currents injected in the two sections. The solid squares show the combinations of currents at which QDs' GS and 1st ES give equivalent contributions to the emission spectra. Current combinations at which the device begins lasing are shown in solid circles.

The emission spectra measured from the SOA facet under different I SLD, with I SOA fixed at 6.5, 8.5, and 9.5 A, respectively, are shown in Figure 5. As expected, it can be seen from the figure that the spectrum shape and emission bandwidth of the QD-SLD device with the two-section structure can be tuned by properly controlling the current injection in the two sections. With I SOA fixed at 6.5 A as shown in Figure 5a, the GS emission provides the main contribution to the spectrum when the SLD section is not pumped. To obtain a more broadened emission bandwidth based on the balance of the QDs' GS and ES1 emissions, the input beam from the SLD section must provide a greater amount of ES emission. When the SLD section is driven with 400 mA of current-injection in order to seed the SOA section, the resultant emission of the QDs' GS and ES1 have nearly equivalent contributions, and a 76-nm bandwidth is obtained. At this working point, the device gives a 320-mW power output. Similarly, a broad emission spectrum based on the balance between the GS emission and the ES1 emission of QDs is achieved at I SLD = 200 and 100 mA for a given I SOA of 8.5 and 9.5 A, respectively. With I SOA fixed at 8.5 A, when the SLD section is driven with a 200-mA current-injection to seed the SOA section, the QD-SLD device exhibits a broad emission spectrum of 86 nm and a simultaneous high output power of 504 mW. For a given I SOA of 9.5 A, with the SLD section un-pumped, the ES1 emission provides the main contribution to the emission spectrum. In order to achieve a balanced emission from GS and ES1, the GS-dominated emission is introduced to the SOA using I SLD = 100 mA. As a result, the resultant contribution of the QDs' GS and ES1 is equivalent. A broad emission spectrum of 88 nm with the output power of 422 mW is obtained.

Figure 5
figure 5

Normalized emission spectra from the SOA facet under different pumps of the SLD section. They are for a given SOA injection of (a) 6.5, (b) 8.5, and (c) 9.5 A, respectively. Some spectra are shifted vertically for clarity.

It can be seen from the above results that the output power and spectrum bandwidth can be tuned by properly controlling the current densities injected in the two regions of the QD-SLD. Figure 4 shows equal power curves as function of the currents injected in the two sections. Data points (solid squares) at which the GS and ES1 have nearly identical emission intensities, corresponding to the maximum bandwidth of the emission spectrum, are also shown in Figure 4. It can be found that the output power can be tuned over a wide range of 200 to 500 mW while preserving a broad emission spectrum. The high output power and wide power tunability is due to the two-section structure which integrates a tapered SOA section. Current combinations at which the device begins lasing are also shown in Figure 4 (solid circles). Working points of the QD-SLD device can be set in the lower left region of the borderline. An optimum working point is found in the figure that the SOA current is in the 8- to approximately 8.5-A range and the SLD current is 0.2 to approximately 0.25 A, at which a 500-mW output power and an 86-nm bandwidth are achieved simultaneously.


In conclusion, a high-power QD SLD with a broad bandwidth in the emission spectra is achieved by the two-section structure which monolithically integrates an SLD with a tapered SOA. Properly controlling the current densities injected in the two sections, the QD-SLD device exhibits a maximum output power above 500 mW and a simultaneously broad bandwidth of 86 nm. Also, the output power can be tuned over a wide range from 200 to 500 mW while preserving a nearly constant spectral width.


  1. Schmitt JM: Optical coherence tomography (OCT): a review. IEEE J Sel Topics Quantum Electron 1999, 5: 1205–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zotter S, Pircher M, Torzicky T, Bonesi M, Götzinger E, Leitgeb RA, Hitzenberger CK: Visualization of microvasculature by dual-beam phase-resolved Doppler optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2011, 19: 1217–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burns WK, Chen C, Moeller RP: Fiber-optic gyroscopes with broad-band sources. J Lightw Technol 1983, 1: 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee B: Review of the present status of optical fiber sensors. Opt Fiber Technol 2003, 9: 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krstajić N, Childs D, Smallwood R, Hogg R, Matcher SJ: Common path Michelson interferometer based on multiple reflections within the sample arm: sensor applications and imaging artifacts. Meas Sci Technol 2011, 22: 027002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lv XQ, Jin P, Wang ZG: Broadly tunable grating-coupled external cavity laser with quantum-dot active region. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2010, 22: 1799–1801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lv XQ, Jin P, Wang WY, Wang ZG: Broadband external tunable quantum dot lasers with low injection current density. Opt Express 2010, 18: 8916–8922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fedorova KA, Cataluna MA, Krestnikov I, Livshits D, Rafailov EU: Broadly tunable high-power InAs/GaAs quantum-dot external cavity diode lasers. Opt Express 2010, 18: 19438–19443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li X, Cohen AB, Murphy TE, Roy R: Scalable parallel physical random number generator based on a superluminescent LED. Opt Lett 2011, 36: 1020–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun Z-Z, Ding D, Gong Q, Zhou W, Xu B, Wang ZG: Quantum-dot superluminescent diode: a proposal for an ultra-wide output spectrum. Opt Quantum Electron 1999, 31: 1235–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meng XQ, Jin P, Liang ZM, Liu FQ, Wang ZG, Zhang ZY: Structure and properties of InAs/AlAs quantum dots for broadband emission. J Appl Phys 2010, 108: 103515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu J, Wang ZM, Dorogan VG, Li S, Mazur YI, Salamo GJ: Near infrared broadband emission of In 0.35 Ga 0.65 As quantum dots on high index GaAs surfaces. Nanoscale 2011, 3: 1485–1488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Z, Wu J, Wang ZM, Fan D, Guo A, Li S, Yu S, Manasreh O, Salamo GJ: InGaAs quantum well grown on high-index surfaces for superluminescent diode applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 1079–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang ZY, Wang ZG, Xu B, Jin P, Sun ZZ, Liu FQ: High-performance quantum-dot superluminescent diodes. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2004, 16: 27–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li LH, Rossetti M, Fiore A, Occhi L, Velez C: Wide emission spectrum from superluminescent diodes with chirped quantum dot multilayers. Electron Lett 2005, 41: 41–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rossetti M, Markus A, Fiore A, Occhi L, Velez C: Quantum dot superluminescent diodes emitting at 1.3 μm. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2005, 17: 540–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Djie HS, Dimas CE, Wang D-N, Ooi B-S, Hwang JCM, Dang GT, Chang WH: InGaAs/GaAs quantum-dot superluminescent diode for optical sensor and imaging. IEEE Sensors J 2007, 7: 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang ZY, Luxmoore IJ, Jin CY, Liu HY, Jiang Q, Groom KM, Childs DT, Hopkinson M, Cullis AG, Hogg RA: Effect of facet angle on effective facet reflectivity and operating characteristics of quantum dot edge emitting lasers and superluminescent light-emitting diodes. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 081112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haffouz S, Rodermans M, Barrios PJ, Lapointe J, Raymond S, Lu Z, Poitras D: Broadband superluminescent diodes with height-engineered InAs-GaAs quantum dots. Electron Lett 2010, 46: 1144–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang ZY, Jiang Q, Hopkinson M, Hogg RA: Effects of intermixing on modulation p-doped quantum dot superluminescent light emitting diodes. Opt Express 2010, 18: 7055–7063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bakonyi Z, Su H, Onishchukov G, Lester LF, Gray AL, Newell TC, Tünnermann A: High-gain quantum-dot semiconductor optical amplifier for 1300 nm. IEEE J Quantum Electron 2003, 39: 1409–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong HC, Ren GB, Rorison JM: Mode amplification in inhomogeneous QD semiconductor optical amplifiers. Opt Quantum Electron 2006, 38: 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Park J, Kim NJ, Jang YD, Lee EG, Lee JM, Baek JS, Kim JH, Lee HS, Yee KJ, Lee D, Pyun SH, Jeong WG, Kim J: Gain dynamics of an InAs/InGaAsP quantum dot semiconductor optical amplifier operating at 1.5 μm. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 011107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sugawara M, Mukai K, Nakata Y: Light emission spectra of columnar-shaped self-assembled InGaAs/GaAs quantum-dot lasers: effect of homogeneous broadening of the optical gain on lasing characteristics. Appl Phys Lett 1999, 74: 1561–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kovsh A, Krestnikov I, Livshits D, Mikhrin S, Weimert J, Zhukov A: Quantum dot laser with 75 nm broad spectrum of emission. Opt Lett 2007, 32: 793–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhukov AE, Kovsh AR: Quantum dot diode lasers for optical communication system. Quantum Electron 2008, 38: 409–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang ZY, Hogg RA, Xu B, Jin P, Wang ZG: Realization of extremely broadband quantum-dot superluminescent light-emitting diodes by rapid thermal-annealing process. Opt Lett 2008, 33: 1210–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lv XQ, Liu N, Jin P, Wang ZG: Broadband emitting superluminescent diodes with InAs quantum dots in AlGaAs matrix. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2008, 20: 1742–1744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang Q, Zhang ZY, Hopkinson M, Hogg RA: High performance intermixed p-doped quantum dot superluminescent diodes at 1.2 μm. Electron Lett 2010, 46: 295-U49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brezinski ME, Fujimoto JG: Optical coherence tomography: high-resolution imaging in nontransparent tissue. IEEE J Sel Topics Quantum Electron 1999, 5: 1185–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rossetti M, Bardella P, Montrosset I: Numerical investigation of power tenability in two-section QD superluminescent diodes. Opt Quantum Electron 2008, 40: 1129–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xin Y-C, Martinez A, Saiz T, Moscho AJ, Li Y, Nilsen TA, Gray AL, Lester LF: 1.3-μm quantum-dot multisection superluminescent diodes with extremely broad bandwidth. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2007, 19: 501–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Greenwood PDL, Childs DTD, Groom KM, Stevens BJ, Hopkinson M, Hogg RA: Tuning superluminescent diodes characteristics for optical coherence tomography systems by utilizing a multicontact device incorporating wavelength-modulated quantum dots. IEEE J Sel Topics Quantum Electron 2009, 15: 757–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Du GT, Devane G, Stair KA, Wu SL, Chang RPH, Zhao YS, Sun ZZ, Liu Y, Jiang XY, Han WH: The monolithic integration of a superluminescent diode with a power amplifier. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 1998, 10: 57–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Walpole JN: Semiconductor amplifiers and lasers with tapered gain regions. Opt Quantum Electron 1996, 28: 623–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (no. 2006CB604904) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 60976057, 60876086, and 60776037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Jin.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

XL carried out the device process, device characterization, and data analysis; participated in the experimental design; and drafted the manuscript. PJ conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and performed the epitaxial growth. QA participated in the data analysis. ZW participated in its design and carried out some preparative work. XL participated in the epitaxial growth. HW participated in the device process. JW participated in the device process. JW modified the draft. ZW conceived the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, X., Jin, P., An, Q. et al. A high-performance quantum dot superluminescent diode with a two-section structure. Nanoscale Res Lett 6, 625 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • quantum dot
  • superluminescent diode
  • two-section structure
  • optical amplification