Skip to main content

Selective crystallization with preferred lithium-ion storage capability of inorganic materials


Lithium-ion batteries are supposed to be a key method to make a more efficient use of energy. In the past decade, nanostructured electrode materials have been extensively studied and have presented the opportunity to achieve superior performance for the next-generation batteries which require higher energy and power densities and longer cycle life. In this article, we reviewed recent research activities on selective crystallization of inorganic materials into nanostructured electrodes for lithium-ion batteries and discuss how selective crystallization can improve the electrode performance of materials; for example, selective exposure of surfaces normal to the ionic diffusion paths can greatly enhance the ion conductivity of insertion-type materials; crystallization of alloying-type materials into nanowire arrays has proven to be a good solution to the electrode pulverization problem; and constructing conversion-type materials into hollow structures is an effective approach to buffer the volume variation during cycling. The major goal of this review is to demonstrate the importance of crystallization in energy storage applications.


Materials crystallized with unique sizes and structures are expected to find various novel applications [15]. The discovery of novel materials, processes, and phenomena provides fresh opportunities for the development of innovative systems and devices, which is likely to have a profound impact in areas such as energy, electronics, medicine, and biotechnology [612]. Batteries are a major technological challenge in the present society as they are a key method to make a more efficient use of energy [1315]. Although the current lithium-ion battery (LIB) technology has conquered the portable electronic markets and is still improving, the use of LIB in the powering of plug-in electric vehicles or the storage of renewable energies (wind, solar) is still challenging [16]. The performance of LIB depends essentially on the thermodynamics and kinetics of the electrochemical reactions involved in the electrode materials. During the past decade, extensive efforts have been made to developing advanced batteries with large capacity, high energy and power densities, high safety, long cycle life, fast response, and low cost [1720]. These developments rely on new ways to prepare electrode materials via eco-efficient processes; achieving these goals will require the inputs of multiple disciplines.

LIBs comprise four major components: a cathode, anode, separator, and electrolyte (Figure 1). During electrochemical reactions, lithium ions move from the cathode to the anode through the separator and the electrolyte or vice versa. LIB electrode materials can be classified into three groups depending on their reaction mechanisms with lithium ion [2123], as shown in Figure 2: (1) insertion/extraction reaction mechanism that involves the insertion and extraction of Li into and from the lattice, (2) Li-alloy reaction mechanism, and (3) conversion reaction mechanism that involves the formation and decomposition of Li oxide (Li2O), accompanying the reduction and oxidation of metal nanoparticles. These three reaction mechanisms are displayed as follows:

Figure 1

Schematic illustration of a LIB. Various materials with different structures can be used for anodes and cathodes.

Figure 2

Schematic illustration of different types of lithium-ion storage materials.

  • Insertion reaction mechanism:

    M O x +  yL i + +  y e - L i y M O x
  • Li-alloy reaction mechanism:

    M x O y +  2yL i + +  2y e - xM + yL i 2 O ( e . g . ,  Sn O 2 )
    M + zL i + +  ze - L i z M
  • Conversion reaction mechanism:

    M x O y +  2yL i + +  2y e - xM + yL i 2 O

Insertion-type materials containing cobalt are the most studied cathodes for LIB [21]. They show high stability in a high-voltage range; however, cobalt has limited availability in nature and is toxic, which is a tremendous drawback for mass manufacturing. Manganese offers a low-cost substitution with a high thermal threshold and excellent rate capabilities but limited cycling behavior [21]. Olivines are nontoxic and have a moderate capacity with low fade due to cycling, but their conductivity is quite low [24]. Alloy anodes have high capacities but show a dramatic volume change in charging and discharging, resulting in poor cycling behavior [25], a similar problem also found in conversion-type materials [26].

Nanostructuring electrode materials has been proven to be an effective strategy to alleviate these above problems [2731]. There are several advantages associated with the development of nanomaterials for LIBs [27], which include (1) better accommodation of the strain of lithium insertion/removal, improving cycle performance; (2) new reactions which are not possible in bulk materials may happen; (3) better electrode/electrolyte contact, and (4) short path lengths for electron and Li+ transport. Here, we summarize recent scientific research and development of LIB electrode materials upon novel nanoscience and nanotechnology progresses. The focus is on research activities toward the selective crystallization of inorganic materials with preferred shapes, sizes, and structures, which can influence ionic diffusion and transport, electron transfer, surface/interface interaction, and the electrochemical reactions. The effect of selective crystallization on the LIB performances of electrode materials is discussed in detail according to different Li storage mechanisms. The current review shows that the selective crystallization route plays a predominant role in the development of next-generation LIBs.

Insertion-type materials

Insertion-type materials involve most cathode materials and some anode materials (such as graphite, Li4Ti5O12, and TiO2). The first generation of LIB uses LiCoO2 and graphite as the positive and negative electrodes; the redox operation of both versus lithium is based on intercalation reactions. Alternative materials such as LiMn2O4, LiFePO4, and Li4Ti5O12 have also reached the market at different levels, bringing about incremental improvements in performance [32]. Nonetheless, all these materials have intrinsic capacity limitations, which are derived from their redox mechanisms and structural aspects, i.e., the intrinsic redox activity of the transition metals and the changes the crystal structure can withstand. Such limitation handicaps the device in terms of energy density. Power density of these cathode materials with bulk sizes is also generally low due to the high level of polarization at high charge/discharge rates [32]. Therefore, the selective crystallization approach was introduced to overcome these shortcomings by decreasing diffusion paths for mass transport and increasing the surface area for charge transfer.

The characteristic structure of insertion-type materials is an ionic diffusion path. It is clear that morphological control of nanocrystalline materials is significantly important. The selective exposure of surfaces normal to the most facile pathway for lithium-ion conduction is preferred, and the length of particles along the ionic diffusion direction should be decreased since it can enhance electrochemical performance by reducing transport path lengths as well as enhance the electrode/electrolyte contact [33]. For example, in an olivine structure where ionic diffusion paths are along the b-axis (Figure 3), a smaller dimension along the ionic diffusion direction can be obtained via the realization of three types of morphologies: (1) zero-dimensional spherical nanoparticles; (2) one-dimensional (1D) nanorods oriented with long axes along the a or c direction; or (3) two-dimensional (2D) nanoplates with a (101) basal plane.

Figure 3

The crystal structure of olivine LiFePO 4 in projection along [001].

Based on this idea, nanoparticles of LiFePO4 olivine materials have been synthesized by conventional solid-state synthetic methods and polyol synthesis [34, 35]; 1D nanorods of LiMn1-xFexPO4 with a radial [010] direction can be selectively crystallized by a controlled hydrolysis method (Figure 4a, b, c) [36]. Also, by employing solvothermal synthesis, 2D nanoplates of LiFePO4 with large exposure of (010) face can be obtained (Figure 4d, e, f, g, h, i) [37]. These nanostructured olivine electrodes exhibited better rate performances than bulkier materials due to smaller diffusion length, indicating that selective crystallization is an effective way to obtain high-electrochemical-performance materials.

Figure 4

1D nanorods of LiMn 1-x Fe x PO 4 and 2D nanoplates of LiFePO 4 . (a-c) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of 1D nanorods of LiMn1-xFexPO4 with a radial [010] direction [36]. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag Gmbh & Co. KGaA. Reproduced with permission. (d-i) TEM and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern, and structure illustration of 2D nanoplates of LiFePO4 with large exposure of (010) face. Adapted from [37] and reproduced with the permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.

The spinel-type LiMn2O4 has also attracted continued interest. LiMn2O4 is favorable for its safety and intrinsic rate capability and has been established as cathode materials for electric vehicle applications [38]. However, the gradual capacity loss due to Jahn-Teller distortion of Mn3+ and Mn dissolution in the electrolyte has hindered its application [39]. A solution to this problem is selective crystallization of nanostructured spinels such as LiMn2O4 nanorods and nanowires. In a nanostructured spinel, the phase-boundary energy dramatically changes with the particle size, which can promote the solubility and solid solution properties and thus changes the kinetics and thermodynamics of Li-insertion reactions. Freestanding, single-crystalline LiMn2O4 nanorods have been fabricated using single-crystalline MnO2 nanorods as precursor via a simple solid-state reaction [40], as shown in Figure 5. LIB testing showed that LiMn2O4 nanorods can deliver a capacity of 100 mAh g-1 at a high current density of 148 mA g-1 with high reversibility and good capacity retention; after 100 cycles, more than 85% of the initial capacity was maintained. An extended method to prepare porous LiMn2O4 nanorods has also been reported, using porous Mn2O3 nanorods resulting from the thermal decomposition of MnC2O4 as precursor [41]. The as-synthesized porous nanorods exhibited high rate capability and cyclability. An initial discharge capacity of 105 mAh g-1 was obtained at a 10 C rate, and capacity retention of about 90% was obtained after 500 cycles. The authors attributed this durable, high rate capability to the unique, porous 1D nanostructure that gave rise to fast Li-intercalation kinetics and good structural stability for the spinel electrodes.

Figure 5

Single-crystalline LiMn 2 O 4 nanorods; porous LiMn 2 O 4 nanorod formation process; MnC 2 O 4 , porous Mn 2 O 3 ; and porous LiMn 2 O 4 nanorods. (a) SEM and (b) TEM images and (c) SAED pattern of single-crystalline LiMn2O4 nanorods fabricated using single-crystalline MnO2 nanorods as precursor. Adapted from [40] and reproduced with the permission of the American Chemical Society. (d) Illustration of the porous LiMn2O4 nanorod formation process. SEM micrographs of (e) MnC2O4 nanorods, (f) porous Mn2O3 nanorods, and (g) porous LiMn2O4 nanorods. (h, i) TEM images of the porous LiMn2O4 nanorods. (j) High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image and the corresponding fast Fourier transform diffraction pattern (inset) of a single nanoparticle in the porous nanorods. Adapted from [41] and reproduced with the permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Vanadium oxide (V2O5) is a typical intercalation compound as a result of its layered structure; orthorhombic, crystalline V2O5 consists of layers of VO5 square pyramids that share edges and corners (Figure 6). For LIB applications, V2O5 offers the essential advantages of low cost, abundant source, easy synthesis, and high energy densities [42]. The crystallization of V2O5 into specific nanostructures also plays an important role in improving the electrochemical performance of rechargeable LIBs. For controlling the nanostructure of V2O5, Liu and Xue reported a solution route to fabricate single-crystalline V2O5·xH2O nanorings and microloops (Figure 7a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h) [43], the formation of rolling structures are caused by the cation-induced asymmetric strain on layered-structure V2O5·xH2O nanobelts. This work demonstrates that the novel nanoring structure, which has been observed previously only for polar surface-dominated structure materials, can also form in compounds without anion- and cation-terminated surfaces. This proposed cation-induced strategy extends the existing formation mechanism of nanorings and can be applied to other materials. Recently, Liu and Xue also reported a scalable, highly reproducible, and template-free process to crystallize a yolk-shell V2O5 microsphere cathode material (Figure 7i, j, k, l) [44]. This featured material has a high specific capacity (280 mAh g-1) in the initial discharge process and excellent retention of the initial capacity after 30 cycles. During the whole cyclic process, the Coulombic efficiency steadily kept the values higher than 95%. The enhanced electrochemical performance is closely related to the selectively crystallized yolk-shell microstructure. The hollow-structured feature facilitates the electrolyte transport, and the small granularity and cavity among individual nanoparticles (porous shell) can effectively prevent the amorphization of the electrode, which is the main cause of the capacity fading of V2O5 during cycling.

Figure 6

The crystal structure of orthorhombic V 2 O 5 in projection along [001].

Figure 7

Single-crystalline V 2 O 5 ·xH 2 O nanorings and microloops, and yolk-shell V 2 O 5 microspheres. (a-h) SEM images of single-crystalline V2O5·xH2O nanorings and microloops [43]. (i-l) SEM images of yolk-shell V2O5 microspheres. The insets of (j) and (k) show the schematic structure of yolk-shell V2O5 microspheres. Adapted from [44] and reproduced with the permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Besides increasing capacity, a high cell voltage resulting from a high (cathode) and low (anode) standard redox potential of the respective electrode redox reaction can also greatly improve the energy density of LIB. Due to the redox potential of an intercalation compound which mainly tracks the iono-covalency of the metal-X bonding, selective crystallization of cathode materials with fluorine substitution appears to be quite an attractive route to increase the material redox voltage as F is very electronegative [16]. Recently, Barpanda et al. reported a polyanionic material that crystallizes in the triplite structure Li(Fe1-δMnδ)SO4F [45]. An open-circuit voltage of 3.9 V has been achieved, exceeding that of LiFePO4 by 450 mV. Also, this new triplite phase is capable of reversibly releasing and reinserting 0.7 to 0.8 Li ions with a volume change of only 0.6% (compared with 7% and 10% for LiFePO4 and LiFeSO4F, respectively), to give a capacity of 125 mAh g-1. Such a material could become a promising cathode to replace LiFePO4. These new types of polyanionic compound, having the triplite structure, provide valuable information in the search for even better cathode materials.

In the case of anode materials, the formation of a solid-electrolyte-interface (SEI) layer on which metallic lithium is deposited during a fast charge of the battery should also be a concern. The dendrites can grow to short-circuit the battery and ignite the electrolyte. Therefore, safety concerns have led to a search for anode materials having a redox couple in the range of 1.0 to 1.5 eV below the Fermi energy of lithium. The spinel Li4Ti5O12 is reported to be a stable anode operating on the Ti(IV)/Ti(III) redox couple located at 1.5 V versus Li+/Li. It is capable of a fast charge and a long cycle life because no SEI layer is formed [4648]. However, it has a low specific capacity (approximately 140 mAh g-1), and the high redox potential (1.5 V) reduces the energy density of a cell using this anode. On the basis of these considerations, different niobium-based oxides such as KNb5O13 and K6Nb10.8O30 have been investigated, which exhibit a reversible Li insertion toward the targeted voltage range of 1.0 to 1.5 V versus Li+/Li [49, 50]. More recently, the mixed titanium-niobium oxides such as TiNb2O7 have been selectively crystallized as the anode for lithium batteries with some similar electrochemical properties [51, 52]. Notably, carbon-coated TiNb2O7 gives a reversible specific capacity of approximately 285 mAh g-1 cycled between 1.0 and 2.5 V versus Li+/Li with a Coulombic efficiency over 98% [52]. These new-type anodes provided promising candidates for batteries with high rate, high cycle life, and better safety.

From the above discussion, it is evident that selective crystallization of insertion-type materials into nanosized particles and shapes with specific facets can effectively enhance the lithium-ion diffusion rate and improve their cycling performance; these improvements are all closely related to the crystal structure and reaction mechanisms of this kind of materials. As an alternative route, tuning the crystal structure by selective atom substitution can also improve the energy density of LIB by increasing the cell voltage.

Alloying-type materials

Some main-group elements (e.g., Si, Ge, Sn, Al, Bi, Zn, and Sb) can alloy with lithium at a low potential. Representatively, Si and Sn can form lithium alloys with Li compositions up to Li4.4M, giving theoretical specific capacities as high as 4,200 and 993 mAh g-1, respectively [5355]. Unfortunately, huge volume changes occur during the electrochemical lithiation/delithiation process [56]. For example, a volume expansion on the order of 400% occurred during the formation of Li4.4Si alloy, which causes cracking and eventual pulverization of the electrode and results in rapid capacity decline (Figure 8a).

Figure 8

Schematic illustration of structure changes during the electrochemical cycling process. (a) Si particles and (b) Si nanowire arrays.

As a solution against the volume change problem, selective crystallization of alloy materials into different nanoforms has been suggested because the toughness and adhesion effect within grain boundaries may increase at nanoscale and nanostructured alloys are more flexible to accommodate the strain induced by volume variations [57]. Yang et al. first reported that nanosize Sn electrodes can exhibit much better cycling performance than bulk Sn electrodes due to a smaller absolute volume change [58]. Recently, 1D nanowires of alloy materials have received more attention. Chan et al. reported that Si nanowire arrays grown directly on a current collector exhibited stable cycle performances, because the nanowires were not pulverized or broken due to facile strain relaxation of the nanowire geometry (Figure 8b) [59]. Also, the efficient 1D electron transport and good contact with current collector also contribute to their improved LIB performance. Cao et al. presented a concept of using Cu-Si and Cu-Si-Al2O3 nanocable arrays directly grown from the current collector as LIB anodes (Figure 9) [60]. The conductive Cu cores that are anchored to the copper foil act as both current collectors and structural reinforcements for the Si shell of the nanocables. The outer surface of the nanocables is readily modified by an additional sheath of Al2O3, which provides a stable Si/electrolyte interface. Both nanocables show excellent electrochemical performance including high specific capacity and cycling stability (1,890 and 1,820 mAh g-1 under a discharge and charge current density of 0.3 A g-1). After coating with Al2O3 sheaths, the Cu-Si-Al2O3 nanocables showed a remarkable high rate capability and delivered a capability of 1,140 mAh g-1 at 7 A g-1.

Figure 9

Cu-Si and Cu-Si-Al 2 O 3 nanocables and their fabrication. (a) Schematic diagram showing the fabrication of Cu-Si and Cu-Si-Al2O3 nanocables. (b) TEM and (c) HRTEM images of a Cu-Si-Al2O3 nanocable. (d) Annual dark-field TEM image and (e) corresponding elemental mappings of O, Al, Si, and Cu for the Cu-Si-Al2O3 nanocable [53]. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag Gmbh & Co. KGaA. Reproduced with permission.

Carbon protection has been proven to be an effective route to enhance the cycle stability of alloying-type electrode materials [61]. Because of their high capacity and wide availability, Si-based nanocomposites are among the most attractive anode materials, and much progress has been made in this regard. Some recent examples include graphene-grafted Si nanoparticles [62] and Si nanowires with carbon nanotube coatings [63]. Notably, selective crystallization of Si on the hierarchical carbon spheres with irregular channels has been reported. The hierarchical composite possesses an interconnected, aperiodic, porous network with internal channels, enabling high accessibility of the active Si for fast lithiation. Large Si volume changes can be accommodated by the particle's internal porosity. A reversible capacity of 1,950 mAh g-1 and a stable performance are attained [64]. In the case of tin-carbon composite materials, porous structures including Sn nanoparticles confined in hollow carbon capsule and coaxial SnO2@C hollow spheres proved to be promising anode candidates for highly reversible lithium storage [65, 66]. Recently, Sn nanopillar arrays embedded between graphene sheets were assembled using a conventional film deposition and annealing process (Figure 10) [67]. The as-formed three-dimensional (3D) multilayered nanostructure can be directly used as an anode material without adding any polymer binder and carbon black. This composite showed high reversible capacity (714 mAh g-1) and excellent cycling performance at a high current density of 5 A g-1 and demonstrated that a highly functional nanocomposite can also be fabricated by employing conventional top-down manufacturing methods and self-assembly principles.

Figure 10

Graphene/Sn-nanopillar composite and its preparation procedure. (a) Schematic illustration of the graphene/Sn-nanopillar composite preparation procedure. (b, c) SEM images of graphene/Sn-nanopillar composite. Adapted from [60] and reproduced with the permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.

To tackle the volume change problem, selective crystallization of alloying-type materials into specific structures has also been employed. Some peculiarly designed nanoscale electrodes, such as hollow nanostructures, have more free space and can endure larger stresses [68]. For example, Liu et al. successfully designed a template-free route to fabricate double-shelled SnO2-V2O5 nanocapsules [69]. The formation mechanism of these double-shelled, hollow nanocapsules is a combination of both inward and outward Ostwald ripening processes, which is shown in Figure 11a. Ostwald ripening firstly took place at the surface of these solid nanospheres, which results in the void formation between two layers. Following this inward ripening process, the solid core of nanospheres ripened outward, leading to a double-shelled V2O3-SnO2 hollow structure. Finally, double-shelled V2O5-SnO2 nanocapsules were obtained by the calcination of these V2O3-SnO2 nanocapsules in open air. Figure 11b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i shows the structural characterizations of these composite nanocapsules. The double-shelled structure is obvious from these pictures, and SnO2 crystallines are homogenously distributed in the V2O5 matrix. These V2O5-SnO2 hollow nanocapsules showed a large reversible capacity of 947 mAh g-1 as an anode material and good cycling stability (can deliver a reversible capacity of 673 mAh g-1 after 50 cycles). The reversible capacity as an anode can be further improved by increasing the content of SnO2 in nanocomposites. With 15 wt.% SnO2 content, the first discharge capacity can reach 1,776 mAh g-1; after 20 cycles, the reversible discharge capacity maintains 1,046 mAh g-1 without obvious capacity fading except for the first cycle. The excellent capacity retention was largely attributed to the large free space between the shells which can effectively accommodate the volume variation. It is worth noting that tin-based anodes have already been applied in the commercialized rechargeable LIBs. Therefore, the development of alloy anodes has opened a new avenue in the fabrication of advanced LIBs.

Figure 11

V 2 O 5 -SnO 2 double-shelled nanocapsules and their formation process. (a) Schematic presentation of the formation process of V2O5-SnO2 double-shelled nanocapsules based on Ostwald ripening. (b) SEM image of V2O5-SnO2 double-shelled nanocapsules. Inset shows the schematic structure of these double-shelled nanocapsules. (c-e) TEM images indicate that the porous shell consists of a great deal of nanocrystals. (f-h) HRTEM images revealing lattice planes of the V2O5 matrix and SnO2 nanocrystals. (i) SAED pattern taken from individual nanocapsules which shows that these nanocapsules are polycrystalline. Adapted from [62] and reproduced with the permission of the American Chemical Society.

Conversion-type materials

Interstitial-free, 3D transition-metal oxides (MxOy, M = Fe, Co, Ni, Mn, Cu, etc.) are capable of incorporating more than one Li per 3D metal, hence giving high Li storage capacities [70]. The Li storage mechanism of the MxOy differs from the Li-intercalation and Li-alloying mechanisms. Transition-metal oxides are reduced to metal in the lithiation process (Equation 4). During the first reduction of the metal oxide, highly reactive metallic nanodomains embedded in a Li2O matrix can be generated in situ, which contributed to the reversibility of this reaction [70]. Based on this mechanism, reversible lithium storage proceeds more easily with the nanostructured oxides. Therefore, selective crystallization of transition-metal oxides has a significant role for their LIB performances. Similar to the Li-alloying process, the conversion reaction leads to volume variation upon the electrochemical cycling. Conceptually, approaches such as constructing hollow structures or nano-compositing are applicable to conversion-type anode materials as well.

Recently, Liu et al. reported a novel self-templated method to fabricate anisotropic Co3O4 porous and hollow nanocapsules from CoCO3 precursors [71]. The selective crystallization is based on the inside-out Ostwald ripening process. Figure 12a illustrates the transformation process from CoCO3 precursors to anisotropic Co3O4 porous and hollow nanocapsules. During the solvothermal process, two spherical CoCO3 colloids aggregated and fused together under the driving force of the magnetic dipole interaction between these spherical precursors, forming anisotropic, dumbbell-like structures. Subsequently, these dumbbell-like colloids underwent a ripening process to form nanorods, and the subsequent heat treatment of these CoCO3 nanorods led to the formation of Co3O4 shells; the generation of nanoporous can be attributed to the release of CO2 from the CoCO3 nanocrystals along different directions. Figure 12b, c, d shows the surface morphology and microstructure of CoCO3 precursors and corresponding Co3O4 porous and hollow nanocapsules; these nanocapsules have nanoporous shells with dense nanopores. The LIB testing of these Co3O4 porous nanocapsules showed that this kind of structure exhibited superior performances with good cycle life and high capacity, at a discharge/charge current density of 110 mA g-1; these anisotropic Co3O4 porous and hollow nanocapsules showed a high reversible capacity of 1,018 mAh g-1, and a capacity of 1,000 mAh g-1 can be obtained after 20 cycles. These high performances can be attributed to their porous and hollow nanostructures and small size of building blocks. Self-supported Co3O4 mesoporous nanowires directly grown on a Ti substrate as current collector were prepared using a template-free ammonia evaporation-induced method [72]. Due to the novel hierarchical structure that favors electrolyte diffusion and electric contact, the mesoporous nanowire array delivered a first discharge capacity of 1,124 mAh g-1 and maintained a stable capacity of 700 mAh g-1 after 20 cycles, and a considerable capacity of 450 mAh g-1 can be obtained at a high rate of 20 C.

Figure 12

Anisotropic porous Co 3 O 4 nanocapsules and their evolution process. (a) Schematic presentation of the evolution process of anisotropic Co3O4 porous nanocapsules. (b) Low-magnification SEM image showing that these nanocapsules are nearly monodisperse. (c) Low-magnification TEM image showing the porous shell of anisotropic Co3O4 nanocapsules. (d) High-magnification TEM image exhibiting a single, porous Co3O4 nanocapsule. (e) HRTEM image of individual nanocrystals revealing the (111) lattice plane. Adapted from [64] and reproduced with the permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Compared to Co, Fe is of lower cost, lower toxicity, and higher abundance, rendering iron oxides as more attractive anode materials. In particular, the spinel Fe3O4 demonstrates high electronic conductivity and is suitable for potential high-power application. A 3D composite has been constructed by selectively crystallizing Fe3O4 nanoparticles encapsulated within carbon shells onto reduced graphene oxide (RGO) sheets (Figure 13a, b) [73], which exhibited enhanced anode performances in LIBs with a specific capacity of 842 mAh g-1 and superior recycle stability after 100 cycles; these can be attributed to the unique 3D structure of the composite; the 2D layered structure of RGO combined with the close structure of carbon shells provided a rigid and highly conductive matrix for Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Besides Fe3O4, Fe2O3 has also attracted much interest. For example, selective crystallization of α-Fe2O3 hollow spheres with sheet-like subunits can be achieved by a quasiemulsion-templated method (Figure 13c, d) [74]. Quasiemulsion microdroplets of glycerol were dispersed in water to serve as soft templates for the deposition of the α-Fe2O3 shell. When tested as anode materials for LIBs, these α-Fe2O3 hollow spheres showed a high reversible capacity of 710 mAh g-1, even after 100 cycles. A two-step electrode design consisting of the electrochemically assisted template growth of Cu nanorods onto a current collector followed by electrochemical plating of Fe3O4 was also proposed (Figure 13e) [75]. Using such electrodes, a factor of six improvement in power density over planar electrodes while maintaining the same total discharge time can be achieved. The capacity at the 8 C rate was 80% of the total capacity and was sustained over 100 cycles. Such findings will help pave the way for the application of conversion reaction electrodes in LIB.

Figure 13

Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles, α-Fe 2 O 3 hollow spheres, and the two-step electrode design. (a, b) TEM images of Fe3O4 nanoparticles encapsulated within carbon shells anchoring on RGO sheets. Adapted from [66] and reproduced with the permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) SEM and (d) TEM images of α-Fe2O3 hollow spheres with sheet-like subunits. Adapted from [67] and reproduced with the permission of the American Chemical Society. (e) Illustration of a two-step electrode design consisting the electrochemically assisted template growth of Cu nanorods onto a current collector followed by the electrochemical plating of Fe3O4.

The use of transition-metal oxides as conversion-type electrodes holds the promise of higher energy density and wealth of compounds, but capacity fading needs to be overcome before practical use in LIB; bulk electrodes fail within a few charge/discharge cycles due to the large volumetric change that occurs during lithiation and delithiation. Selective crystallization into specific structures and composites can have a major impact on the performance and cyclability of the conversion-type anode. Nanoscale morphologies have the potential to achieve long cycling lifetimes and good reversibility as stress management and formation of a stable passivation layer during cycling can be achieved.

Conclusions and outlook

Selective crystallization of electrode materials into nanostructures has presented the opportunity to design novel energy-storage materials for the next-generation, high-performance LIBs with higher energy density, higher power density, and longer cycle life. Due to the high surface area and specific configuration of nanostructured materials, these electrodes can provide high lithium-ion flux across the interface, short diffusion pathways for both Li ions and electrons, abundant active sites for Li storage, and high freedom for volume change during electrochemical charge/discharge process. In this review article, three categories of LIB electrode materials were discussed. The first one is insertion-type materials, which can store Li through an intercalation process. The improved storage ability is closely related to their surface area, crystallinity, as well as the orientation of these crystallites. In the second group, alloying-type materials such as Sn and Si were presented. Nanostructuring these bulk materials into nanowire arrays and dispersing these elements into rigid matrices have been proven to be effective approaches to overcome the poor cycling problems. The third category is conversion-type materials. Their large-scale application is also hindered by the rapid capacity decay during charging/discharging because of the significant volume change. Nanostructures with hollow interiors and nanocomposites have been developed to address this problem. For a specific material, it is hard to achieve a structure which own all advantaged features, and for different materials, the effect of the crystallization feature is not identical; therefore, much necessary work still needs to be done to give a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between nanostructures and their performances.

To realize widespread commercial applications, controlled and large-scale fabrication of nanostructures is required, in which selective crystallization should play a vital role. The future directions of electrode materials for LIBs should focus on exploring new types of lithium-ion redox couples with different electrode reaction mechanisms and designing novel structures and morphologies in order to further increase battery energy/power densities, enhance charge/discharge rate capability, improve service life and safety, and reduce the cost at the same time. The 3D nanoarchitectured cells, in which pillared anodes and cathodes are interdigitated, have already attracted much interest. Developing flexible electrodes and all-solid batteries is a strong demand for meeting the various requirements of modern gadgets, which will also be an important feature of research in future years.


  1. 1.

    Liu J, Liu F, Gao K, Wu J, Xue D: Recent developments in the chemical synthesis of inorganic porous capsules. J Mater Chem 2009, 19: 6073–6084. 10.1039/b900116f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yan X, Xu D, Xue D: SO42-ions direct the one-dimensional growth of 5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O. Acta Mater 2007, 55: 5747–5757. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liu F, Xue D: Controlled fabrication of Nb2O5hollow nanospheres and nanotubes. Mod Phys Lett B 2009, 23: 3769–3775. 10.1142/S0217984909021818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Liu J, Xue D: Thermal oxidation strategy towards porous metal oxide hollow architectures. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 2622–2626. 10.1002/adma.200800208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Luo C, Xue D: Mild, quasireverse emulsion route to submicrometer lithium niobate hollow spheres. Langmuir 2006, 22: 9914–9918. 10.1021/la062193v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wu J, Xue D: Controlled etching of hexagonal ZnO architectures in an alcohol thermal process. Mater Res Bull 2010, 45: 295–299. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2009.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Liu F, Xue D: One-step solution-based strategy to 3D superstructures of Nb2O5-LiF. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett 2009, 1: 66–71. 10.1166/nnl.2009.1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wu J, Xue D: Crystallization of NaNbO3microcubes by a solution-phase ion exchange route. Cryst Eng Comm 2011, 13: 3773–3781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liu F, Xue D: Assembly of nanoscale building blocks at solution/solid interfaces. Mater Res Bull 2010, 45: 329–332. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2009.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xu J, Xue D: Five branching growth patterns in the cubic crystal system: a direct observation of cuprous oxide microcrystals. Acta Mater 2007, 55: 2397–2406. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu F, Xue D: Self-construction of core-shell TiO2: a colloidal-molecular mediated recrystallization process. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett 2011, 3: 389–393. 10.1166/nnl.2011.1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liu F, Xue D: CuS hierarchical architectures by a combination of bottom-up and top-down method. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett 2011, 3: 440–445. 10.1166/nnl.2011.1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chiang YM: Building a better battery. Science 2010, 330: 1485–1486. 10.1126/science.1198591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kang J, Ko Y, Park J, Kim D: Origin of capacity fading in nano-sized Co3O4electrodes: electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study. Nanoscale Res Lett 2008, 3: 390–394. 10.1007/s11671-008-9176-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Seo SD, Jin YH, Lee SH, Shim HW, Kim DW: Low-temperature synthesis of CuO-interlaced nanodiscs for lithium ion battery electrodes. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 397. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tarascon JM: Key challenges in future Li-battery research. Phil Trans R Soc A 2010, 368: 3227–3241. 10.1098/rsta.2010.0112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu F, Song S, Xue D, Zhang H: Folded structured graphene paper for high performance electrode materials. Adv Mater 2012, 24: 1089–1094. 10.1002/adma.201104691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tarascon JM, Armand M: Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 2001, 414: 359–367. 10.1038/35104644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Malik R, Zhou F, Ceder G: Kinetics of non-equilibrium lithium incorporation in LiFePO4. Nat Mater 2011, 10: 587–590. 10.1038/nmat3065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sun YK, Myung ST, Park BC, Prakash J, Belharouak I, Amine K: High-energy cathode material for long-life and safe lithium batteries. Nat Mater 2009, 8: 320–324. 10.1038/nmat2418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Song H, Lee KT, Kim MG, Nazar LF, Cho J: Recent progress in nanostructured cathode materials for lithium secondary batteries. Adv Mater 2010, 20: 3818–3834.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ji L, Lin Z, Alcoutlabi M, Zhang X: Recent developments in nanostructured anode materials for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4: 2682–2699. 10.1039/c0ee00699h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cheng F, Liang J, Tao Z, Chen J: Functional materials for rechargeable batteries. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 1695–1715. 10.1002/adma.201003587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yuan L, Wang Z, Zhang W, Hu X, Chen J, Huang Y, Goodenough JB: Development and challenges of LiFePO4cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4: 269–284. 10.1039/c0ee00029a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Goodenough JB, Kim Y: Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem Mater 2010, 22: 587–603. 10.1021/cm901452z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Huang J, Zhong L, Wang C, Sullivan JP, Xu W, Zhang LQ, Mao SX, Hudak NS, Liu XH, Subramanian A, Fan H, Qi L, Kushima A, Li J: In situ observation of the electrochemical lithiation of a single SnO2nanowire electrode. Science 2010, 330: 1515. 10.1126/science.1195628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Arico AS, Bruce PG, Scrosati B, Tarascon JM, Schalkwijk WV: Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nat Mater 2005, 4: 366–377. 10.1038/nmat1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bruce PG, Scrosati B, Tarascon JM: Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 2008, 47: 2930–3946. 10.1002/anie.200702505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Liu C, Li F, Ma L, Cheng H: Advanced materials for energy storage. Adv Mater 2010, 22: E28-E62. 10.1002/adma.200903328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Guo Y, Hu J, Wan L: Nanostructured materials for electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 2878–2887. 10.1002/adma.200800627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cao A, Hu H, Liang H, Wan L: Self-assembled vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) hollow microspheres from nanorods and their application in lithium-ion batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 2005, 44: 4391–4395. 10.1002/anie.200500946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Goodenough JB, Kim Y: Challenges for rechargeable batteries. J Power Sources 2011, 196: 6688–6694. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lee KT, Cho J: Roles of nanosize in lithium reactive nanomaterials for lithium ion batteries. Nano Today 2011, 6: 28–41. 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gibot P, Casas-Cabanas M, Laffont L, Levasseur S, Carlach P, Hamelet S, Tarascon JM, Masquelier C: Room-temperature single-phase Li insertion/extraction in nanoscale LixFePO4. Nat Mater 2008, 7: 741–747. 10.1038/nmat2245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Meethong N, Kao YH, Carter WC, Chiang YM: Comparative study of lithium transport kinetics in olivine cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Chem Mater 2010, 22: 1088–1097. 10.1021/cm902118m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wang H, Yang Y, Liang Y, Cui L, Casalongue HS, Li Y, Hong G, Cui Y, Dai H: LiMn1-xFexPO4nanorods grown on graphene sheets for ultrahigh-rate-performance lithium ion batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 2011, 50: 7364–7368. 10.1002/anie.201103163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nan C, Lu J, Chen C, Peng Q, Li Y: Solvothermal synthesis of lithium iron phosphate nanoplates. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 9994–9996. 10.1039/c0jm04126b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Luo WB, Dahn JR: Comparative study of Li[Co1-zAlz]O2prepared by solid-state and co-precipitation methods. Electrochim Acta 2009, 54: 4655–4661. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.03.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Winter M, Besenhard JO, Spahr ME, Novák P: Insertion electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Adv Mater 1998, 10: 725–763. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199807)10:10<725::AID-ADMA725>3.0.CO;2-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kim DK, Muralidharan P, Lee HW, Ruffo R, Yang Y, Chan CK, Peng H, Huggins RA, Cui Y: Spinel LiMn2O4nanorods as lithium ion battery cathodes. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3948–3952. 10.1021/nl8024328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cheng F, Wang H, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Zhang T, Tao Z, Chen J: Porous LiMn2O4nanorods with durable high-rate capability for rechargeable Li-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4: 3668–3675. 10.1039/c1ee01795k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wang Y, Cao G: New developments of nanostructured cathode materials for highly efficient lithium ion batteries. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 2251–2269. 10.1002/adma.200702242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Liu J, Xue D: Cation-induced coiling of vanadium pentoxide nanobelts. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 1619–1626. 10.1007/s11671-010-9685-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Liu J, Zhou Y, Wang J, Pan Y, Xue D: Template-free solvothermal synthesis of yolk-shell V2O5microspheres. Chem Commun 2011, 47: 10380–10382. 10.1039/c1cc13779d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Barpanda P, Ati M, Melot BC, Rousse G, Chotard JN, Doublet ML, Sougrati MT, Corr SA, Jumas JC, Tarascon JM: A 3.90 V iron-based fluorosulphate material for lithium-ion batteries crystallizing in the triplite structure. Nat Mater 2011, 10: 772–779. 10.1038/nmat3093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lee DK, Shim HW, An JS, Cho CM, Cho IS, Hong KS, Kim DW: Synthesis of heterogeneous Li4Ti5O12nanostructured anodes with long-term cycle stability. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 1585–1589. 10.1007/s11671-010-9680-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Zhu GN, Liu HJ, Zhuang JH, Wang CX, Wang YG, Xia YY: Carbon-coated nano-sized Li4Ti5O12nanoporous micro-sphere as anode material for high-rate lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4: 4016–4022. 10.1039/c1ee01680f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kang E, Jung YS, Kim GH, Chun J, Wiesner U, Dillon AC, Kim JK, Lee J: Highly improved rate capability for a lithium-ion battery nano-Li4Ti5O12negative electrode via carbon-coated mesoporous uniform pores with a simple self-assembly method. Adv Funct Mater 2011, 21: 4349–4357. 10.1002/adfm.201101123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Han JT, Liu DQ, Song SH, Kim Y, Goodenough JB: Lithium ion intercalation performance of niobium oxides: KNb5O13and K6Nb10.8O30. Chem Mater 2009, 21: 4753–4755. 10.1021/cm9024149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lu YH, Goodenough JB, Dathar GKP, Henkelman G, Wu J, Stevenson K: Behavior of Li guest in KNb5O13host with one-dimensional tunnels and multiple interstitial sites. Chem Mater 2011, 23: 3210–3216. 10.1021/cm200958r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Han JT, Goodenough JB: 3-V full cell performance of anode framework TiNb2O7/Spinel LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4. Chem Mater 2011, 23: 3404–3407. 10.1021/cm201515g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Han JT, Huang YH, Goodenough JB: New anode framework for rechargeable lithium batteries. Chem Mater 2011, 23: 2027–2029. 10.1021/cm200441h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Szczech JR, Jin S: Nanostructured silicon for high capacity lithium battery anodes. Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4: 56–72. 10.1039/c0ee00281j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Zhang WJ: Lithium insertion/extraction mechanism in alloy anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 2011, 196: 877–885. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Park CM, Sohn HJ: Quasi-intercalation and facile amorphization in layered ZnSb for li-ion batteries. Adv Mater 2010, 22: 47–52. 10.1002/adma.200901427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Teki R, Datta MK, Krishnan P, Parker TC, Lu TM, Kumta PN, Koratkar N: Nanostructured silicon anodes for lithium ion rechargeable batteries. Small 2009, 5: 2236–2242. 10.1002/smll.200900382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kasavajjula U, Wang CS, Appleby AJ: Nano- and bulk-silicon-based insertion anodes for lithium-ion secondary cells. J Power Sources 2007, 163: 1003–1039. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Yang J, Winter M, Besenhard JO: Li- alloy anodes for lithium-ion-batteries. Solid State Ionics 1996, 90: 281–287. 10.1016/S0167-2738(96)00389-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Chan CK, Peng HL, Liu G, McIlwrath K, Zhang XF, Huggins RA, Cui Y: High-performance lithium battery anodes using silicon nanowires. Nat Nanotechnol 2008, 3: 31–35. 10.1038/nnano.2007.411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Cao F, Deng J, Xin S, Ji H, Schmidt OG, Wan L, Guo Y: Cu-Si nanocable arrays as high-rate anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 4415–4420. 10.1002/adma.201102062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Cheng L, Yan J, Zhu G, Luo J, Wang C, Xia Y: General synthesis of carbon-coated nanostructure Li4Ti5O12as a high rate electrode material for Li-ion intercalation. J Mater Chem 2010, 20: 595–620. 10.1039/b914604k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Wang J, Zhong C, Chou S, Liu H: Flexible free-standing graphene-silicon composite film for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochem Commun 2010, 12: 1467–1470. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Chan CK, Patel RN, O'Connell MJ, Korgel BA, Cui Y: Solution-grown silicon nanowires for lithium-ion battery anodes. ACS Nano 2010, 3: 1443–1450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Magasinski A, Dixon P, Hertzberg B, Kvit A, Ayala J, Yushin G: High-performance lithium-ion anodes using a hierarchical bottom-up approach. Nat Mater 2010, 9: 353–358. 10.1038/nmat2725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Chen Y, Huang QZ, Wang J, Wang Q, Xue JM: Synthesis of monodispersed SnO2@C composite hollow spheres for lithium ion battery anode applications. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 17448–17453. 10.1039/c1jm13572d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Liu J, Xue D: Sn-based nanomaterials converted from SnS nanobelts: facile synthesis, characterizations, optical properties and energy storage performances. Electrochim Acta 2010, 56: 243–250. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.08.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ji L, Tan Z, Kuykendall T, An EJ, Fu Y, Battaglia V, Zhang Y: Multilayer nanoassembly of Sn-nanopillar arrays sandwiched between graphene layers for high-capacity lithium storage. Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4: 3611–3616. 10.1039/c1ee01592c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Liu J, Xue D: Hollow nanostructured anode materials for Li-ion batteries. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 1525–1534. 10.1007/s11671-010-9728-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Liu J, Xia H, Xue D, Lu L: Double-shelled nanocapsules of V2O5-based composites as high-performance anode and cathode materials for Li ion batteries. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 12086–12087. 10.1021/ja9053256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Cabana J, Monconduit L, Larcher D, Palacín MR: Beyond intercalation-based Li-ion batteries; the state of the art and challenges of electrode materials reacting through conversion reactions. Adv Mater 2010, 22: E170-E192. 10.1002/adma.201000717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Liu J, Xia H, Lu L, Xue D: Anisotropic Co3O4porous nanocapsules toward high-capacity Li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem 2010, 20: 1506–1510. 10.1039/b923834d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Li Y, Tan B, Wu Y: Mesoporous Co3O4nanowire arrays for lithium ion batteries with high capacity and rate capability. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 265–270. 10.1021/nl0725906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Li B, Cao H, Shao J, Qu M: Enhanced anode performances of the Fe3O4-Carbon-rGO three dimensional composite in lithium ion batteries. Chem Commun 2011, 47: 10374–10376. 10.1039/c1cc13462k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Wang B, Chen JS, Wu HB, Wang Z, Lou XW: Quasiemulsion-templated formation of α-Fe2O3hollow spheres with enhanced lithium storage properties. J Am Chem Soc 2011, 133: 17146–17148. 10.1021/ja208346s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Taberna PL, Mitra S, Poizot P, Simon P, Tarascon JM: High rate capabilities Fe3O4-based Cu nano-architectured electrodes for lithium-ion battery applications. Nat Mater 2006, 5: 567–573. 10.1038/nmat1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 50872016, 20973033, and 51125009) and the National Natural Science Foundation for Creative Research Group (No. 20921002) are acknowledged.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dongfeng Xue or Hongjie Zhang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

FL, SS, HZ, and DX conceived the review. FL drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, F., Song, S., Xue, D. et al. Selective crystallization with preferred lithium-ion storage capability of inorganic materials. Nanoscale Res Lett 7, 149 (2012).

Download citation


  • crystallization
  • lithium-ion battery
  • nanowire
  • hollow structure
  • nanocomposites.