 Nano Idea
 Open Access
 Published:
Radiation effect on viscous flow of a nanofluid and heat transfer over a nonlinearly stretching sheet
Nanoscale Research Lettersvolume 7, Article number: 229 (2012)
Abstract
In this work, we study the flow and heat transfer characteristics of a viscous nanofluid over a nonlinearly stretching sheet in the presence of thermal radiation, included in the energy equation, and variable wall temperature. A similarity transformation was used to transform the governing partial differential equations to a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. An efficient numerical shooting technique with a fourthorder RungeKutta scheme was used to obtain the solution of the boundary value problem. The variations of dimensionless surface temperature, as well as flow and heattransfer characteristics with the governing dimensionless parameters of the problem, which include the nanoparticle volume fraction ϕ, the nonlinearly stretching sheet parameter n, the thermal radiation parameter N_{ R }, and the viscous dissipation parameter Ec, were graphed and tabulated. Excellent validation of the present numerical results has been achieved with the earlier nonlinearly stretching sheet problem of Cortell for local Nusselt number without taking the effect of nanoparticles.
Background
The problem of viscous flow and heat transfer over a stretching sheet has important industrial applications, for example, in metallurgical processes, such as drawing of continuous filaments through quiescent fluids, annealing and tinning of copper wires, glass blowing, manufacturing of plastic and rubber sheets, crystal growing, and continuous cooling and fiber spinning, in addition to wideranging applications in many engineering processes, such as polymer extrusion, wire drawing, continuous casting, manufacturing of foods and paper, glass fiber production, stretching of plastic films, and many others. During the manufacture of these sheets, the melt issues from a slit and is subsequently stretched to achieve the desired thickness. The final product with the desired characteristics strictly depends upon the stretching rate, the rate of cooling in the process, and the process of stretching. In view of these applications, Sakiadis [1, 2] investigated the boundarylayer flow of a viscous fluid past a moving solid surface; various aspects of the problem have been explored by many authors in the past decades.
However, all these studies are restricted to linear stretching of the sheet. It is worth mentioning that the stretching is not necessarily linear. In view of this, Kumaran and Ramanaih [3] studied flow over a quadratic stretching sheet, but only a few recent studies focused on exponentially and nonlinearly stretching sheet are cited here. Magyari and Keller [4], Elbashbeshy [5], Khan and Sanjayanand [6], Sanjayanand and Khan [7], Sajid and Hayat [8], and Partha et al. [9] studied the heat transfer characteristics of viscous and viscoelastic fluid flows over an exponentially stretching sheet. Vajravelu [10], Vajravelu and Cannon [11], Cortell [12–15], Prasad et al. [16], Afzal [17], and Nandeppanavar et al. [18] studied the effects of various parameters governing the flow of a viscous fluid over a nonlinearly stretching sheet.
A nanofluid is a new class of heat transfer fluids that contain a base fluid and nanoparticles. The use of additives is a technique applied to enhance the heat transfer performance of base fluids. The thermal conductivity of ordinary heat transfer fluids is not adequate to meet today's cooling rate requirements. Nanofluids have been shown to increase the thermal conductivity and convective heat transfer performance of the base liquids. Nanofluids are suspensions of submicronic solid particles (nanoparticles) in common fluids. The term was coined by Choi [19]. The characteristic feature of nanofluids is thermal conductivity enhancement, a phenomenon observed by Masuda et al. [20]. This phenomenon suggests the possibility of using nanofluids in advanced nuclear systems [21]. A comprehensive survey of convective transport in nanofluids was made by Buongiorno [22], who says that a satisfactory explanation for the abnormal increase of the thermal conductivity and viscosity is yet to be found. He focused on further heat transfer enhancement observed in convective situations. Very recently, Kuznetsov and Nield [23] have examined the influence of nanoparticles on natural convection boundarylayer flow past a vertical plate using a model in which Brownian motion and thermophoresis are accounted for. The authors have assumed the simplest possible boundary conditions, namely those in which both the temperature and the nanoparticle fraction are constant along the wall. Furthermore, Nield and Kuznetsov [24, 25] have studied the Cheng and Minkowycz [26] problem of natural convection past a vertical plate in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid. The model used for the nanofluid incorporates the effects of Brownian motion and thermophoresis for the porous medium. The Darcy model has been employed.
Hamad and Bashir [27] numerically investigated the problem of forced convection heat transfer to the power law nonNewtonian nanofluid from the stretching surface. Khan and Pop [28] focused on the problem of laminar fluid flow, which results from the stretching of a flat surface in a nanofluid. A similarity solution of the steady boundary layer flow near the stagnationpoint flow on a permeable stretching sheet in a porous medium saturated with a nanofluid and in the presence of internal heat generation/absorption was theoretically studied by Hamad and Pop [29]. Hamad and Ferdows [30] investigated the heat and mass transfer analysis for boundary layer stagnationpoint flow over a stretching sheet in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid with internal heat generation/absorption and suction/blowing. The problem of laminar fluid flow, which results from the stretching of a vertical surface with variable stream conditions in a nanofluid, was investigated numerically by Kandasamy et al. [31]. Makinde and Aziz [32] studied numerically the boundary layer flow induced in a nanofluid due to a linearly stretching sheet. Hamad [33] examined the convective flow and heat transfer of an incompressible viscous nanofluid past a semiinfinite vertical stretching sheet in the presence of a magnetic field. All these researchers studied the linear stretching sheet in the nanofluid, but only the numerical investigation by Rana and Bhargava [34] studied the steady laminar boundary fluid flow, which results from the nonlinear stretching of a flat surface in a nanofluid, and incorporated the effects of Brownian motion and thermophoresis. Also, more recently, Nadeem and Lee [35] investigated analytically the problem of steady boundary layer flow of nanofluid over an exponential stretching surface including the effects of Brownian motion parameter and thermophoresis parameter.
Presentation of the hypothesis
To the authors' knowledge, no studies have thus far been communicated with regard to the boundary layer viscous flow and heat transfer of a nanofluid past a nonlinearly stretching sheet in the presence of the radiation effect in a onephase model. The aim of the present paper is therefore to extend the work of Cortell [13] by taking the steady thermal boundarylayer flow with nonlinearly stretching sheet in a nanofluid. The present study is of immediate interest to all those processes which are highly affected with heat enhancement concept, e.g., cooling of metallic sheets or electronic chips, etc. An efficient numerical shooting technique with a fourthorder RungeKutta scheme was used to solve the normalized boundary layer equations, and the effects of nanoparticle volume fraction ϕ, nonlinearly stretching sheet parameter n, thermal radiation parameter N_{ R }, and viscous dissipation parameter Ec are described in details and are further presented in tabular form.
Testing the hypothesis
Problem formulation
We consider a steady, incompressible, laminar, twodimensional boundary layer flow of a viscous nanofluid past a flat sheet coinciding with the plane y = 0 and the flow being confined to y > 0. The flow is generated due to nonlinear stretching of the sheet caused by the simultaneous application of two equal and opposite forces along the xaxis. Keeping the origin fixed, the sheet is then stretched with a velocity u_{ w }(x) = Cx^{n}, where C is a constant, n is a nonlinear stretching parameter, and x is the coordinate measured along the stretching surface, varying nonlinearly with the distance from the slit. A schematic representation of the physical model and coordinate system is depicted in Figure 1. The thermophysical properties of the nanofluid are given in Table 1 (see [36]). The pressure gradient and external forces are neglected. The basic steady conservation of mass, momentum, and thermal energy equations for nanofluid by using usual boundarylayer approximations in the presence of radiation and viscous dissipation can be written in Cartesian coordinates x and y as:
The associated boundary conditions of Equations 1, 2, and 3 can be written as:
where x and y denote the Cartesian coordinates along the sheet and normal to it, and u and v are the velocity components of the nanofluid in the x and ydirections, respectively. n and m are the nonlinear stretching parameter and the surface temperature parameter, respectively. The temperature on the wall is T_{ w }, and the ambient is held at constant temperature T_{∞}. ρ_{ nf } and μ_{ nf } are the density and effective viscosity of the nanofluid, and α_{ nf } and υ_{ nf } are the thermal diffusivity and the kinematic viscosity, respectively, which are defined as (see Khanafer et al. [37]):
Here, ϕ is the solid volume fraction, where μ_{ f } is the viscosity of the basic fluid, ρ_{ f } and ρ_{ s } are the densities of the pure fluid and nanoparticle, respectively, (ρc_{ p })_{ f } and (ρc_{ p })_{ s } are the specific heat parameters of the base fluid and nanoparticle, respectively, and k_{ f } and k_{ s } are the thermal conductivities of the base fluid and nanoparticle, respectively. Using the Rosseland approximation for radiation, the radiative heat flux is simplified as:
where σ* and k* are the StefanBoltzmann constant and the mean absorption coefficient, respectively. We assume that the temperature differences within the flow, such as the term T^{4}, may be expressed as a linear function of temperature. Hence, expanding T^{4} in a Taylor series about a free stream temperature T_{∞} and neglecting higherorder terms, we get:
From Equation 3 and in view of Equations 6 and 7, it is seen that the effect of radiation is to enhance the thermal diffusivity. If we take ${N}_{R}={k}_{nf}{k}^{*}/\left[4{\sigma}^{*}{T}_{\infty}^{3}\right]$as the radiation parameter, Equation 3 becomes:
where ${k}_{0}=\frac{3{N}_{R}}{3{N}_{R}+4}$. It is worth citing here that the classical solution for energy equation, Equation 8, without thermal radiation influence can be obtained from the above equation, which reduces to $u\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}+v\frac{\partial T}{\partial y}={\alpha}_{nf}\frac{{\partial}^{2}T}{\partial {y}^{2}}$as N_{ R } →∞ (i.e., k_{0} → 1) and eliminates viscous dissipation.
By introducing the following nondimensional variables:
then the governing Equations 1, 2, and 8 reduce to:
so that all similar solutions put m = 2n in Equation 11, which becomes:
and the transformed boundary conditions (Equation 4) become:
where Pr = υ_{ f }/α_{ f } is the Prandtl number, and Ec = u_{ w }^{2}/[(c_{ p })_{ f }(T_{w}  T_{∞})] is the Eckert number. In the above equations, primes denote differentiation with respect to η.
It is worth mentioning that Equation 10 with the boundary conditions in Equation 13, with n = 0, is the classical Blasius flatplate flow problem, and a detailed numerical study of that problem has been carried out by the author of this work. For the linearly stretching boundary problem (i.e., n = 1), the exact solution for f is f(η) = 1  e^{η}; this exact solution is unique, while for the nonlinearly stretching boundary problem (i.e., n ≠ 1), there is no exact solution. The quantities of practical interest in this study are the skin friction coefficient C_{ f } and the local Nusselt number Nu_{ x }, which are defined as:
Using Equation (9), the quantities (14) can be expressed as:
Results and discussion
In order to get the physical insight into the flow problem, comprehensive numerical computations are conducted for various values of the parameters that describe the flow characteristics, and the results are illustrated graphically. The system of nonlinear ordinary differential Equations 10 and 12 with the boundary conditions (Equation 13) are integrated numerically by means of the efficient numerical shooting technique with a fourthorder RungeKutta scheme (MATLAB package). The step size η = 0.001 was used while obtaining the numerical solution with η_{max} = 6. The physical quantities of interest here are the skin friction coefficient C_{ f } and the Nusselt number Nu_{ x }, which are obtained and given in Equations 15 and 16. The distributions of the velocity f'(η), the temperature θ(η) from Equations 10 and 12, the skin friction at the surface, and the Nusselt number for different types of nanofluids are shown in Figures 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14.
We consider three different types of nanoparticles, namely, copper (Cu), alumina (Al_{2}O_{3}), and titanium oxide (TiO_{2}), with water as the base fluid. Table 1 shows the thermophysical properties of water and the elements Cu, Al_{2}O_{3}, and TiO_{2}. The Prandtl number of the base fluid (water) is kept constant at 6.2. It is worth mentioning that this study reduces the governing Equations 1012 to those of a viscous or regular fluid when ϕ = 0. In order to verify the accuracy of the present method, we have compared our results with those of Cortell [12, 13] for the rate of heat transfer  θ'(0) in the absence of the nanoparticles (ϕ = 0), without (N_{ R } → ∞ (i.e., k_{0} = 1)) and with thermal radiation parameter. The comparisons in all the above cases are found to be in excellent agreement, as shown in Tables 2 and 3. Table 4 depicts the skin friction at the surface  f"(0) for various values of nonlinear stretching sheet n, with ϕ = 0.1, Pr = 6.2, Ec = 0.5, and N_{ R } = 5 for different types of nanoparticles when the base fluid is water. It can be seen from Table 4 that f"(0) increases with an increase in the nonlinear stretching parameter n, and the Cu nanoparticles are the highest skin friction, followed by TiO_{2} and Al_{2}O_{3}.
Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the effect of nanoparticle volume fraction ϕ on the nanofluid velocity and temperature profile, respectively, in the case of Cu nanoparticles and water base fluid (Pr = 6.2) when ϕ = 0, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2, with Ec = 0.1, n = 10, and NR = 1. It is clear that, as the nanoparticles volume fraction increases, the nanofluid velocity decreases, and the temperature increases. These figures illustrate this agreement with the physical behavior. When the volume of nanoparticles increases, the thermal conductivity increases, and then the thermal boundary layer thickness increases. Figures 4 and 5 depict the effect of nonlinearly stretching sheet parameter n on velocity distribution f'(η) and temperature profile θ(η), respectively. Figure 4 illustrates that an increase of nonlinear stretching sheet parameter n tends to decrease the nanofluid velocity in the case of Cuwater when n = 0.75, 1.5, 3, 7, and 10, with Ec = 0.1, N_{ R } = 1, and ϕ = 0.1. Furthermore, Figure 5 shows that increasing the nonlinear stretching sheet parameter n tends to decrease the temperature distribution the same values, thus leading to higher heat transfer rate between the nanofluid and the surface. The effect of the viscous dissipation parameter Ec on the temperature profile in the case of Cuwater when the Eckert number Ec = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 with n = 10, N_{ R } = 1, and ϕ = 0.1 is shown in Figure 6. It is clear that the temperature distribution increases with an increase in the viscous dissipation parameter Ec. Figure 7 shows the influence of thermal radiation parameter N_{ R } on the temperature profile in the case of Cuwater. It is clear that the temperature decreases with an increase in the thermal radiation parameter N_{ R }; this leads to an increase in the heat transfer rate. Moreover, Figure 8 shows this effect of the thermal radiation parameter on the temperature distribution but for the different types of nanoparticles with water as the base fluid. It can be seen from Figure 8 that θ(η) decreases with an increase in the thermal radiation parameter as shown in Figure 7, and the Cu nanoparticles have the highest value of temperature distribution than the nanoparticles Al_{2}O_{3} and TiO_{2}. The influence of Ec and n on the temperature profiles for all types of nanoparticles is shown in Figures 9 and 10, respectively. It is found that the temperature decreases with n and increases with Ec as shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively, and the TiO_{2} nanoparticles proved to have the highest cooling performance for this problem.
The influence of nonlinear stretching sheet n on the skin friction at the surface f'' (0) with N_{ R } = 5, Pr = 6.2, ϕ = 0.1, and Ec = 0.5 is shown in Figure 11. It can be noticed that, from Table 4 and Figure 11, the numerical values of f'' (0) for different kinds of nanofluids increase with an increase in the nonlinear stretching parameter n. This implies an increment of the skin friction at the surface where Cu nanoparticles have the highest skin friction than the other nanoparticles. Figures 12,13,14 display the behavior of the heat transfer rates under the effects of N_{ R }, Ec, and n, respectively, using different nanofluids for Pr = 6.2 and ϕ = 0.1. These figures show that, when using different kinds of nanofluids, the heat transfer rates change, which means that the nanofluids will be important in the cooling and heating processes. It can be noticed from the results above that, as expected, the heat transfer rate increases with an increase in the thermal radiation parameter N_{ R } and nonlinear stretching sheet parameter n, and decreases rapidly with an increase in the viscous dissipation parameter Ec.
Implications of the hypothesis
The problem of boundarylayer flow and heat transfer in a viscous nanofluid over a nonlinearly stretched nonisothermal moving flat surface in the presence or absence of thermal radiation using the Rosseland approximation for the radiative heat flux was analyzed. The governing partial differential equations were converted to ordinary differential equations by using a suitable similarity transformation and were then solved numerically via shooting method by employing throughout our calculations the fourthorder RungeKutta scheme (MATLAB package). The effects of the solid volume fraction ϕ, thermal radiation parameter N_{ R }, nonlinear stretching sheet parameter n, and the viscous dissipation parameter Ec on the flow and heat transfer characteristics are determined for three kinds of nanofluids: copper, alumina, and titanium oxide.

1.
The increase of the solid volume fraction ϕ and the nonlinear stretching sheet parameter n leads to the decrease of dimensionless surface velocity; this yields an increase in the skin friction at the surface.

2.
An increment in the solid volume fraction ϕ and the Eckert number Ec yields an increment in the nanofluid's temperature; this leads to a rapid reduction in the heat transfer rates.

3.
An increase in the thermal radiation parameter N_{ R } and the nonlinear stretching sheet parameter n yields a decrease in the nanofluid's temperature, which leads to an increase in the heat transfer rates.

4.
The TiO_{2} nanoparticles proved to have the highest cooling performance for this problem than the other two types of nanoparticles (cu and Al_{2}O_{3} nanoparticles).
Abbreviations
Nomenclature
b: constant; C: physical parameter related with stretched surface; C_{ f }: skin friction coefficient; c_{ p }: specific heat; Ec: Eckert number; f: dimensionless stream function; k: thermal conductivity; k*: mean absorption coefficient; m: surface temperature parameter; N_{ R }: radiation parameter; Nu_{ x }: Nusselt number; Pr: Prandtl number; q_{ r }: radiative heat flux; n: nonlinear stretching parameter; T: temperature; u and v: velocity components along x and ydirections: respectively; x and y: Cartesian coordinates along the plate and normal to it: respectively.
Greek symbols
α: thermal diffusivity; η: similarity variable; θ: dimensionless temperature; μ: effective viscosity; υ: kinematic viscosity; ρ: density; σ*: StefanBoltzmann constant; (ρC_{ p })_{ nf, }heat capacitance of the nanofluid; (ρC_{ p })f: heat capacity of the fluid; (ρC_{ p })_{ s }: effective heat capacity of the nanoparticle material; ϕ: nanoparticle volume fraction.
Subscripts
f: fluid fraction; nf: nanofluid fraction; s: solid fraction; w: condition at the wall; ∞: stream function condition at infinity.
Authors' information
FMH and FSI are professors of applied mathematics. SMAG is a mathematics lecturer, and MR is a PhD student.
Endnotes
This is just a theoretical study; every experimentalist can check it experimentally with our consent.
References
 1.
Sakiadis BC: Boundary layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: I. boundary layer equations for two dimensional and axisymmetric flows. AIChE J 1961, 7: 26–28. 10.1002/aic.690070108
 2.
Sakiadis BC: Boundary layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: II. boundary layer on a continuous flat surface. AIChE J 1961, 7: 221–225. 10.1002/aic.690070211
 3.
Kumaran V, Ramanaih G: A note on the flow over stretching sheet. Arch Mech 1996, 116: 229–233.
 4.
Magyari E, Keller B: Heat mass transfer in the boundary layers on an exponentially stretching sheet. J Phys D: Appl Phys 1999, 32: 577–585. 10.1088/00223727/32/5/012
 5.
Elbashbeshy EMA: Heat transfer over an exponentially stretching continuous surface with suction. Arch Mech 2001, 53: 643–651.
 6.
Khan SK, Sanjayanand E: Viscoelastic boundary layer flow and heat transfer over an exponential stretching sheet. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2005, 48: 1534–1542. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.10.032
 7.
Sanjayanand E, Khan SK: On heat and mass transfer in viscoelastic boundary layer flow over an exponentially stretching sheet. Int J Therm Sci 2006, 45: 819–828. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2005.11.002
 8.
Sajid M, Hayat T: Influence of thermal radiation on the boundary layer flow due to an exponentially stretching sheet. Int Comm Heat Mass Transf 2008, 35: 347–356. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2007.08.006
 9.
Partha MK, Murthy PVSN, Rajasekhar GP: Effect of viscous dissipation on the mixed convection of heat transfer from an exponential stretching surface. Heat Mass Transf 2005, 41: 360–366. 10.1007/s0023100405522
 10.
Vajravelu K: Viscous flow over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. A ppl Math Comput 2001, 124: 281–288.
 11.
Vajravelu K, Cannon JR: Fluid flow over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. A ppl Math Comput 2006, 181: 609–618.
 12.
Cortell R: Viscous flow and heat transfer over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. A ppl Math Comput 2007, 184: 864–873.
 13.
Cortell R: Effects of viscous dissipation and radiation on the thermal boundary layer over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. Phys Lett A 2008, 372: 631–636. 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.08.005
 14.
Cortell R: Similarity solutions for the flow and heat transfer of a quiescent fluid over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. J Mater Process Technol 2008, 203: 176–183. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.055
 15.
Cortell R: Heat and fluid flow due to nonlinearly stretching surfaces. Appl Math Comput 2011, 217: 7564–7572. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.02.029
 16.
Prasad KV, Vajravelu K, Datti PS: Mixed convection heat transfer over a nonlinear stretching surface with variable fluid properties. Int J NonLinear Mech 2010, 45: 320–330. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.12.003
 17.
Afzal N: Momentum and thermal boundary layers over a twodimensional or axisymmetric nonlinear stretching surface in a stationary fluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2010, 53: 540–547. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.04.039
 18.
Nandeppanavar MM, Vajravelu K, Abel MS, Ng C: Heat transfer over a nonlinearly stretching sheet with nonuniform heat source and variable wall temperature. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2011, 54: 4960–4965. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.07.009
 19.
Choi SUS: Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluid with nanoparticles, developments and applications of nonNewtonian flow. ASME FED 1995, 231: 99–105.
 20.
Masuda H, Ebata A, Teramae K, Hishinuma N: Alteration of thermal conductivity and viscosity of liquid by dispersing ultrafine particles. Netsu Bussei 1993, 7: 227–233. 10.2963/jjtp.7.227
 21.
Buongiorno J, Hu W: Nanofluid coolants for advanced nuclear power plants. In Proceedings of ICAPP 05: May 2005. Seoul. Sydney: Curran Associates, Inc; 2005:15–19.
 22.
Buongiorno J: Convective transport in nanofluids. ASME J Heat Transf 2006, 128: 240–250. 10.1115/1.2150834
 23.
Kuznetsov AV, Nield DA: Natural convective boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a vertical plate. Int J Thermal Sci 2010, 49: 243–247. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.07.015
 24.
Nield DA, Kuznetsov AV: The ChengMinkowycz problem for natural convective boundarylayer flow in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2009, 52: 5792–5795. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.07.024
 25.
Nield DA, Kuznetsov AV: The ChengMinkowycz problem for the doublediffusive natural convective boundarylayer flow in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2011, 54: 374–378. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.09.034
 26.
Cheng P, Minkowycz WJ: Free convection about a vertical flat plate embedded in a porous medium with application to heat transfer from a dike. J Geophysics Research 1977, 82(14):2040–2044. 10.1029/JB082i014p02040
 27.
Hamad MAA, Bashir MA: Boundarylayer flow and heat transfer of a powerlaw nonNewtonian nanofluid over a vertical stretching sheet. World Applied Sciences J (Special Issue for Applied Mathematics) 2009, 7: 172–178.
 28.
Khan WA, Pop I: Boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2010, 53: 2477–2483. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.01.032
 29.
Hamad MAA, Pop I: Scaling transformations for boundary layer flow near the stagnationpoint on a heated permeable stretching surface in a porous medium saturated with a nanofluid and heat generation/absorption effects. Transp Porous Med 2011, 87: 25–39. 10.1007/s1124201096838
 30.
Hamad MAA, Ferdows M: Similarity solution of boundary layer stagnationpoint flow towards a heated porous stretching sheet saturated with a nanofluid with heat absorption/generation and suction/blowing: a lie group analysis. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 2011, 17(1):132–140.
 31.
Kandasamy R, Loganathan P, Arasu PP: Scaling group transformation for MHD boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a vertical stretching surface in the presence of suction/injection. Nuclear Engineering Design 2011, 241: 2053–2059. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.04.011
 32.
Makinde OD, Aziz A: Boundary layer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet with a convective boundary condition. Int J Therm Sci 2011, 50: 1326–1332. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2011.02.019
 33.
Hamad MAA: Analytical solution of natural convection flow of a nanofluid over a linearly stretching sheet in the presence of magnetic field. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2011, 38: 487–492. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.12.042
 34.
Rana P, Bhargava R: Flow and heat transfer of a nanofluid over a nonlinearly stretching sheet: a numerical study. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 2011, 17(1):212–226.
 35.
Nadeem S, Lee C: Boundary layer flow of nanofluid over an exponentially stretching surface. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 94. 10.1186/1556276X794
 36.
Oztop HF, AbuNada E: Numerical study of natural convection in partially heated rectangular enclosures filled with nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2008, 29: 1326–1336. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.04.009
 37.
Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightstone M: Buoyancydriven heat transfer enhancement in a twodimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2003, 46: 3639–3653. 10.1016/S00179310(03)00156X
Acknowledgements
The authors are very thankful to the editor and the reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve the presentation of this paper.
Author information
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
MRE did the major part of the article; however, the funding, computational suggestions, and proof reading were done by FSI, FMH and SMAG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 nanofluid
 nonlinearly stretching surface
 viscous dissipation
 thermal radiation.